Here is my final post about philosophy..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,


Here is my final post about philosophy..


Why i am morality ?

This is a philosophical question:

Political philosophy says that it is easy to hate,
and it is easy to destroy, since today we can easily
destroy our world with weapons of mass destruction,
but notice that it is "easy", and that's not in accordance
with morality, since to be able to be order you have to be
the effort of being order and responsability, this is
the first rule in political philosophy.

More philosophy about who are we the people of this earth in political philosophy ?

I think that we are not white or black or such ethnic groups,
we have to be "morality" and morality is a balance of perfections
so that to be correct morality, like a balance between competition
and collaboration and a balance between individualism and collectivism
etc. and morality is "progressive", this is what i think we are in philosophy.. and to be able to know more about morality, here is my previous political philosophy about morality that shows that it must be progressive:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4


And to know more about this kind of balance between competition and collaboration, here is more of my political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:

Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q


As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine
Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that
nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too
much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance
between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others
by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD
papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not
collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are
noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are
becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a
part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that
Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of
like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i
think that this new model is better because it is more efficient ,
because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and
more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of
progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten
cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today
to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and
also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the
others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my
following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with
others, here they are:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it
is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and
competition.


More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ?


So are humans smart ?


I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart, since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here:


How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter


https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/


So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think that you will soon notice it by following the exponential progress of our humanity.


More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic..


I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ?


First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is going "very" fast, look at the following video to understand it:


Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s


So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic.


And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also comes from the following process:


How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter


https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/


And here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress"


--


This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence


This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus


This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science


This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless


This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


So let us take together this beautiful breakfast


This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess


This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance


--


More philosophy about the hypothetical and the reality..

Do we have to measure it absolutely or relatively ?

This is an important question in philosophy:

So how do we have to measure happiness ? and is happiness real ?

So i think that the philosopher Albert Camus was not smart when he said that life is absurd, by saying the following:

"Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that."

So what is the right way to measure it ?

I think it is like science, since we are not yet perfect, so i think it is "hypothetical" to say that life is absurd like was saying the philosopher Albert Camus, because we have to to be pragmatic in science and measure it taking into account our "imperfections" and "limitations", so the are we happy must be measured in a pragmatic way, so then you can notice that my philosophy is more pragmatic, since it is explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, so then life is not absurd, since the meaning of life is that we are getting happiness from this kind of mechanism that looks like the alternance of the day and night from where comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so then we have to be careful by being selective of the kind of pleasures of life that make us happy so that for example to not be too much materialism that causes problems.

More philosophy and psychology about how to appreciate pleasures of life..


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video, because
it is also like philosophy, so look at it carefully and my
thoughts about it are below:

The story of my life - From a dream to reality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wFsYY71wyk


I think that this swedish women is an artist and photographer
that is locally smart in what she is doing, since she is like creating
pleasures of life by showing us her videos of the beautiful Sweden's nature, but the weakness of what she is doing is that this swedish women
is not a philosopher like me, so she is not understanding correctly,
because she is thinking that happiness comes from those high quality pleasures of life of the so beautiful Sweden's nature that she is showing in her videos, but i think it is a mistake, since not all people have those "high" quality pleasures of life, so in my philosophy(read about it below) i am explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, this is why i am saying the following in my philosophy:

More philosophy about the great movie called Cast Away..


I invite you to look at the following short video of a great movie called Cast Away:


Academy Award®-winning filmmaker Robert Zemeckis and two-time Oscar winner Tom Hanks reunite to explore the blessings and heartache of fate and the survival of the human spirit. Tom Hanks gives one of the towering screen performances of all time as Chuck Noland, a FedEx systems engineer whose ruled-by-the-clock existence abruptly ends when a harrowing plane crash leaves him isolated on a remote island. As Chuck struggles to survive, he finds that his own personal journey has only just begun...


Look here at the following short video of this great movie called Cast Away:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zZ3UYd1UxA


I think you have to look or look again at this great movie, because when you are smart you will notice that the movie also learns you the way of my philosophy below, i mean that Chuck Noland in the video(that is Tom Hanks) is getting like more and more hungry for our kind of civilization by being isolated on a remote island and he is learning to understand the way of my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life, because by being isolated on a remote island he is also learning to appreciate our kind civilization and this is also from where comes happiness, so you have to be smart by reading my following thoughts of my philosophy about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life and by at the same time making the logical analogy with the great movie above that we call Cast Away:

So i will ask a philosophical question:


From where comes happiness and pleasures of life?


It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence.

More philosophy about do we have to measure it relatively or absolutely..


When you measure an IQ , you can measure it relatively to the distribution of other IQs, but is it the right measure? so this question is really important, since the philosopher Albert Camus was measuring the meaning and purpose of life by measuring it like absolutely by saying that human existence is absurd by saying:


"Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that."


But i think this is a mistake, since in my philosophy i am measuring the meaning of human existence "relatively" to pleasures of life that are like "powerful" drugs that bring us more happiness and so they give meaning to human existence(since they are like powerful drugs) and they permit us to go forward towards more and more perfection and this going forward towards more and more perfection is also the goal of morality(read below my political philosophy about morality so that to understand it), so i think i am right by saying so, so then human existence is not absurd.


And also don't forget to read my following philosophy about human existence..

I have just created a webpage on my website here about my philosophy
about human existence, you can read it carefully here:

https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.