sms <
scharf...@geemail.com> wrote
> In my area, most people do travel at least around the greater Bay Area
> where coverage greatly varies when you leave the core urban area of each
> county. I can drive ten minutes into the surrounding foothills of my
> town and be in an area with no AT&T or T-Mobile coverage, according to
> both the carrier's maps as well as the FCC maps.
I tell it like it is.
And I live in the same area that Steve does (he's in Cupertino, while
I'm in those "surrounding foothills" of the Santa Cruz mountain range).
I've had all three major US carriers sequentially over time.
They're all about the same out here in terms of overall coverage (IMHO).
For some reason, only Steve shills for a carrier on this newsgroup,
where everyone else doesn't care what carrier they're on for the most part.
Most of us just pick one of the big three in the USA (AT&T, T-Mobile or
Verizon) and stick with them - and over time - I've had all three of them.
Rest assured I'd notice if the coverage sucked any more on one than on the
other given I live in those "surrounding foothills" that Steve claims has
no T-Mobile coverage - but - as always from Steve - fantastic Verizon
coverage.
Even nospam wouldn't say that crap since the coverage varies where Steve,
the consummate politician, always cherry picks the exact spot to prove the
point he pre-determined (which is the only way a politician can do things).
I'm well aware that others (like badgolferman) are of the same opinion that
I am, and I'm also well apprised of the yearly annual empirical tests which
pit the three carriers for coverage - which never support Steve's claims.
Of course, Steve will pick the one spot in the middle of Death Valley that
has only Verizon coverage and not T-Mobile coverage - but that's his ploy.
Steve will also foist fake JPGs that he's personally edited out the
captions & the fact they never cover 5G signal - only 4G (not even 3G).
He doesn't tell you any of that so either he's ignorant that these are
calculated maps based on what carriers tell the FCC and that NONE of these
maps that Steve provides us has _any_ 5G coverage at all on them.
Ever the consummate politician, Steve feeds us this falsified data to fit
his pre-determined opinion that Verizon is fantastic & T-Mobile sucks.
BTW... as I said, I've had all three (sequentially) in the Silicon Valley
and surrounding hills plus I hike a lot where my friends and neighbors I
hike with have all three, and my assessment is that their coverage is about
the same in these same "surrounding hills" that Steve swears is filled to
the brim with Verizon coverage and not at all with T-Mobile coverage.
After having said they're all about the same, I don't make any money off of
any of them (as Steve has said he does) so I don't care if one is better
than the other - and - in fact - I might move to it if it was much better.
I'm no fool. I'll take the best service (price to performance) out there,
although I don't go to the inordinately complex machinations that Steve is
a genius at for finding the one MVNO at the one moment that has a deal.
I give my sincere thanks and kudos to Steve for unearthing the best deals
in not only MVNOs but also credit cards and charging hardware - where I've
actually purchased most of the charging hardware that Steve recommended.
I even bought both the $100 Google Fi Motorola phone and three free Samsung
A32-5G phones when Steve pointed each of them out on this newsgroup, so I
find Steve's affinity to find the best deal rather astutely helpful
(where the iPhone was half price - with a trade-in - on that same deal).
In summary, Steve is rather astute in finding the best hardware, and in
finding the best prices on MVNOs, credit cards and phone deals... but...
Steve shills too hard for Verizon over T-Mobile where most of us on
T-Mobile don't seem to be able to support Steve's views on that carrier.
Not that we care about the carrier, per se (as we don't); but we do care
that the truth be brought forth - where methinks Steve skews the facts.