Those are great news. May I would suggest that we re-engage in the
discussion
starting from a review of the current (or last) state of the CCIF from you?
Pablo
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum (CCIF)" group.
> To post to this group, send email to cloud...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> cloudforum+...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/cloudforum?hl=en
>
> -----
> Join our Twitter Group at www.twitter.com/cloudforum
> Or Our Linkedin Group at http://ruv.net/a/1eo
The Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum (CCIF) was formed in order to enable a global cloud computing ecosystem whereby organizations are able to seamlessly work together for the purposes for wider industry adoption of cloud computing technology and related services. A key focus will be placed on the creation of a common agreed upon framework / ontology that enables the ability of two or more cloud platforms to exchange information in an unified manor.
Mission
CCIF is an open, vendor neutral, not for profit community of technology advocates, and consumers dedicated to driving the rapid adoption of global cloud computing services. CCIF shall accomplish this by working through the use open forums (physical and virtual) focused on building community consensus, exploring emerging trends, and advocating best practices / reference architectures for the purposes of standardized cloud computing.
Regards.
2012/3/12 ruv <ruv...@gmail.com>:
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum (CCIF)" group.
> To post to this group, send email to cloud...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> cloudforum+...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/cloudforum?hl=en
>
> -----
> Join our Twitter Group at www.twitter.com/cloudforum
> Or Our Linkedin Group at http://ruv.net/a/1eo
--
Boris Quiroz Q.
http://about.me/boris.quiroz
Imho, a revitatlized CCIF could help tremendously in NIST's "Priority
Action Plans" (PAPs) to promote cloud standards!
The first volume of NIST's Cloud Computing Technology Roadmap released
last November
(http://www.nist.gov/itl/cloud/upload/SP_500_293_volumeI-2.pdf)
identified ten "High Priority Requirements", such as metrics, security,
SLAs, federation management, etc., along with "recommended" PAPs for
each requirement.
NIST can't "pick winners in the marketplace" so these PAPs are their
mechanism to facilitate the market to do so. While NIST has some
high-level recommendations, they are actually looking towards the
marketplace to define the specifics in a set of working groups:
http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-cloud-computing/bin/view/CloudComputing/WebHome
If CCIF was "boss of the world" wrt cloud interop, what would it do?
--Craig
On 3/12/12 8:35 AM, ruv wrote:
> The previous goal and mission are as follows. Maybe we should update it.
>
> The Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum (CCIF) was formed in
> order to enable a global cloud computing ecosystem whereby
> organizations are able to seamlessly work together for the purposes
> for wider industry adoption of cloud computing technology and
> related services. A key focus will be placed on the creation of a
> common agreed upon framework / ontology that enables the ability of
> two or more cloud platforms to exchange information in an unified manor.
>
> *Mission*
>
> CCIF is an open, vendor neutral, not for profit community of
> technology advocates, and consumers dedicated to driving the rapid
> adoption of global cloud computing services. CCIF shall accomplish
> this by working through the use open forums (physical and virtual)
> focused on building community consensus, exploring emerging trends,
> and advocating best practices / reference architectures for the
> purposes of standardized cloud computing.
>
>
> On Monday, March 12, 2012 11:30:16 AM UTC-4, pablochacin wrote:
>
> Ruv
>
> Those are great news. May I would suggest that we re-engage in the
> discussion
> starting from a review of the current (or last) state of the CCIF
> from you?
>
> Pablo
>
--Craig
On 3/12/12 9:58 AM, ruv wrote:
> This is very interesting, I'll be in DC next week including meeting with
> various federal CIO's and presenting at the cloud-counsel's Quarterly
> meeting. Will you be there?
>
> ruv
>
> On Monday, March 12, 2012 12:45:52 PM UTC-4, Craig Lee wrote:
>
> Ruv, et al.,
>
> Imho, a revitatlized CCIF could help tremendously in NIST's "Priority
> Action Plans" (PAPs) to promote cloud standards!
>
> The first volume of NIST's Cloud Computing Technology Roadmap released
> last November
> (http://www.nist.gov/itl/cloud/upload/SP_500_293_volumeI-2.pdf
> <http://www.nist.gov/itl/cloud/upload/SP_500_293_volumeI-2.pdf>)
> identified ten "High Priority Requirements", such as metrics, security,
> SLAs, federation management, etc., along with "recommended" PAPs for
> each requirement.
>
> NIST can't "pick winners in the marketplace" so these PAPs are their
> mechanism to facilitate the market to do so. While NIST has some
> high-level recommendations, they are actually looking towards the
> marketplace to define the specifics in a set of working groups:
> http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-cloud-computing/bin/view/CloudComputing/WebHome
> <http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-cloud-computing/bin/view/CloudComputing/WebHome>
>
> If CCIF was "boss of the world" wrt cloud interop, what would it do?
>
> --Craig
>
--
@ruv
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum (CCIF)" group.
To post to this group, send email to cloud...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Forest Zhang