Airf,
For the upcoming BigBlueButton 0.8, we recently did a stress test of
the improved audio code on a Xenon 3450 quad core running
2.66 Ghz with 4G of memory using an internal build of 0.8. We were
able to support 60 simultaneous users with many sharing their webcam.
For test results, see
http://groups.google.com/group/bigbluebutton-dev/browse_thread/thread/3c7ce9815a9800c3
To understand what we meant by 'improved audio', see
http://groups.google.com/group/bigbluebutton-dev/browse_thread/thread/a36d61df9b9fc45b#
In the upcoming BigBlueButton 0.8, the default transcoding using speex
will move the bottleneck for BigBlueButton to the CPU as the number of
users increase. Our current version (0.71a) of BigBlueButton uses a
different method for transcoding the audio, see
http://code.google.com/p/bigbluebutton/wiki/FAQ#Why_is_there_a_delay_in_the_audio_when_I_use_VoIP?
Also, check out this post from a user running a 0.71a server
http://groups.google.com/group/bigbluebutton-users/browse_thread/thread/32d237c9d5f1f36c#
Terry said
> I'd also like to report that we conducted a very large web conference
> last week (over 150 connections) using BBB running under Ubuntu Server
> 10.10 (64-bit) installed on an HP-Compaq Elite 8000 desktop with only
> 4Gb of RAM.
For 0.8, we'll let administrators switch between nellymoser and speex
codec for transcoding audio on the BigBlueButton server.
Finally, there is no hard and fast formula for provisioning a
BigBlueButton server -- it really depends on your use case scenario
and whether you have lots of voice (CPU intensive) and lots of video
and desktop sharing (bandwidth intensive). Bottom line: Use a
dedicated server with a fast quad core CPU and lots of memory.
We recommend you run BigBlueButton on Ubuntu 10.04 32-bit or 64-bit
(not Ubuntu 10.10).
Regards,... Fred
On Apr 18, 6:16 am, Arif Zaman <
az.arif.za...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your response!
>
> I already read out the FAQ sections. But at this point, I want to
> know, from a person who have this sort of deployment experience, about
> the recommended hardware specifications for running BBB server with 50
> users supports by considering audio/video processing as well.
>
> - ARIF
>
> On Apr 18, 4:02 pm, "HostBBB.com" <
sd...@207me.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Arif
http://code.google.com/p/bigbluebutton/wiki/FAQ#What_are_the_minimum_...
>
> > Any basic box that meets the faqs above will work... Or you can use
> > a c1.medium EC2 Instance with 5 compute units.
>
> > The real issue is Network bandwidth... make sure you have adequate up/
> > down speed.. This wont run on a residential cable/DSL connection
> > that is upload limited.
>
> > Check outhttp://
www.bigbluebutton.org/supportforcommercial hosting