| opulation | |
| SOUTH_BALTIC | 7.74% |
| EAST_EURO | 4.86% |
| NORTH-CENTRAL_EURO | 16.43% |
| ATLANTIC | 24.18% |
| WEST_MED | 21.48% |
| ASHKENAZI | 6.83% |
| EAST_MED | 8.40% |
| WEST_ASIAN | 4.03% |
| MIDDLE_EASTERN | 4.15% |
| SOUTH_ASIAN | - |
| EAST_AFRICAN | 0.59% |
| EAST_ASIAN | - |
| SIBERIAN | - |
| WEST_AFRICAN | 1.32% |
| Population | |
| SOUTH_BALTIC | 7.17% |
| EAST_EURO | 3.54% |
| NORTH-CENTRAL_EURO | 19.38% |
| ATLANTIC | 26.14% |
| WEST_MED | 17.11% |
| ASHKENAZI | 7.33% |
| EAST_MED | 10.20% |
| WEST_ASIAN | 0.66% |
| MIDDLE_EASTERN | 5.22% |
| SOUTH_ASIAN | - |
| EAST_AFRICAN | 2.26% |
| EAST_ASIAN | - |
| SIBERIAN | - |
| WEST_AFRICAN | 0.98% |
| Population | |
| North_Sea | 23.69% |
| Atlantic | 29.30% |
| Baltic | 8.14% |
| Eastern_Euro | 1.13% |
| West_Med | 16.40% |
| West_Asian | 2.87% |
| East_Med | 11.96% |
| Red_Sea | 2.11% |
| South_Asian | - |
| Southeast_Asian | - |
| Siberian | - |
| Amerindian | - |
| Oceanian | 0.18% |
| Northeast_African | 3.54% |
| Sub-Saharan | 0.66% |
| # | Population | Percent |
| 1 | ATLANTIC | 24.18 |
| 2 | WEST_MED | 21.48 |
| 3 | NORTH-CENTRAL_EURO | 16.43 |
| 4 | EAST_MED | 8.4 |
| 5 | SOUTH_BALTIC | 7.74 |
| 6 | ASHKENAZI | 6.83 |
| 7 | EAST_EURO | 4.86 |
| 8 | MIDDLE_EASTERN | 4.15 |
| 9 | WEST_ASIAN | 4.03 |
| 10 | WEST_AFRICAN | 1.32 |
| 11 | EAST_AFRICAN | 0.59 |
| # | Population (source) | Distance |
| 1 | ES | 4.62 |
| 2 | PT | 4.91 |
| 3 | FR | 7.87 |
| 4 | North_Italian | 8.62 |
| 5 | Tuscan | 13.67 |
| 6 | AT | 15.97 |
| 7 | Cornish | 16.19 |
| 8 | West_&_Central_German | 17.1 |
| 9 | NL | 17.27 |
| 10 | French_Basque | 17.52 |
| 11 | English | 17.77 |
| 12 | RO | 18.28 |
| 13 | Serbian | 18.49 |
| 14 | IE | 18.9 |
| 15 | Orcadian | 18.97 |
| 16 | HU | 19.2 |
| 17 | Scottish | 19.84 |
| 18 | DK | 20.76 |
| 19 | NO | 22.59 |
| 20 | South_&_Central_Swedish | 23.18 |
| # | Primary Population (source) | Secondary Population (source) | Distance | |||||
| 1 | 92.7% | ES | + | 7.3% | Lezgin | @ | 3.03 | |
| 2 | 94% | ES | + | 6% | GE | @ | 3.3 | |
| 3 | 85.6% | ES | + | 14.4% | RO | @ | 3.5 | |
| 4 | 94.9% | ES | + | 5.1% | Kalash | @ | 3.58 | |
| 5 | 87% | ES | + | 13% | HU | @ | 3.67 | |
| 6 | 86.7% | ES | + | 13.3% | Serbian | @ | 3.7 | |
| 7 | 95.1% | ES | + | 4.9% | Balochi | @ | 3.74 | |
| 8 | 91.8% | ES | + | 8.2% | AJ | @ | 3.74 | |
| 9 | 95.1% | ES | + | 4.9% | Brahui | @ | 3.76 | |
| 10 | 93.3% | ES | + | 6.7% | TR | @ | 3.77 | |
| 11 | 94.3% | ES | + | 5.7% | Kurdish | @ | 3.79 | |
| 12 | 93.4% | ES | + | 6.6% | Erzya | @ | 3.8 | |
| 13 | 94.3% | ES | + | 5.7% | IR | @ | 3.8 | |
| 14 | 92.5% | ES | + | 7.5% | Ukrainian-Russian | @ | 3.82 | |
| 15 | 92.5% | ES | + | 7.5% | West_Russian | @ | 3.85 | |
| 16 | 94.4% | ES | + | 5.6% | Armenian | @ | 3.85 | |
| 17 | 95.6% | ES | + | 4.4% | Burusho | @ | 3.86 | |
| 18 | 93.1% | ES | + | 6.9% | East_Russian | @ | 3.87 | |
| 19 | 86% | ES | + | 14% | AT | @ | 3.88 | |
| 20 | 94% | ES | + | 6% | Udmurt | @ | 3.89 | |
Admix Results (sorted):
#
Population
Percent
1
ATLANTIC
23.12
2
NORTH-CENTRAL_EURO
21.34
3
WEST_MED
16.84
4
EAST_MED
10.05
5
SOUTH_BALTIC
9.76
6
EAST_EURO
8.69
7
ASHKENAZI
4.54
8
MIDDLE_EASTERN
2.89
9
WEST_ASIAN
2.14
Finished reading population data. 78 populations found.
14 components mode.
--------------------------------
Least-squares method.
Using 1 population approximation:
1 FR @ 4.916120
2 PT @ 8.466794
3 ES @ 9.748961
4 AT @ 11.667981
5 West_&_Central_German @ 11.875484
6 NL @ 12.520222
7 Cornish @ 12.597495
8 North_Italian @ 12.609478
9 English @ 13.519628
10 Orcadian @ 15.692276
11 IE @ 16.022589
12 Serbian @ 16.238813
13 DK @ 16.378597
14 HU @ 16.954399
15 Scottish @ 17.166000
16 Tuscan @ 17.797735
17 RO @ 18.234064
18 NO @ 18.565285
19 South_&_Central_Swedish @ 19.095751
20 North_Swedish @ 21.965389
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% PT +50% West_&_Central_German @ 3.359095
Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% ES +25% NL +25% Serbian @ 2.205102
Using 4 populations approximation:
1 ES + FR + North_Swedish + Tuscan @ 1.761447
2 English + ES + ES + Serbian @ 1.848222
3 DK + ES + ES + Serbian @ 1.878541
4 English + ES + PT + Serbian @ 1.883941
5 DK + ES + PT + Serbian @ 2.083688
6 Cornish + ES + PT + Serbian @ 2.172051
7 FR + North_Swedish + PT + Tuscan @ 2.186778
8 ES + ES + NL + Serbian @ 2.205102
9 Cornish + PT + PT + Serbian @ 2.247673
10 ES + NL + PT + Serbian @ 2.307318
11 English + PT + PT + Serbian @ 2.334123
12 ES + Orcadian + PT + Serbian @ 2.389020
13 ES + North_Italian + North_Swedish + PT @ 2.400312
14 DK + FR + North_Italian + PT @ 2.425793
15 FR + North_Italian + North_Swedish + PT @ 2.447107
16 ES + FR + NO + Tuscan @ 2.455767
17 IE + PT + PT + Serbian @ 2.461470
18 ES + IE + PT + Serbian @ 2.461982
19 ES + ES + Serbian + West_&_Central_German @ 2.474127
20 North_Italian + North_Swedish + PT + PT @ 2.475996
Tony Soares
Yes I have some cousins who when I tried to get them to do DNA asked why? They said like you they have had suspicions for years,but unfortunately declined to do the DNA. I was hoping they would as they are the only set who have all four Grandparents from the Açores. I have recently confirmed Ashkenazi on my maternal (non Portuguese) side. With some prodding Mom fessed up to the family secret and told us,of course we had already learned thru our Aunt that it was our G Grand Mother who had stopped actively practicing the jewish Faith in that line. I have not worked my Maternal line at all as have been busy with Dad's,but we do have a pretty good start from a tree my aunt did while in college,this is where we learned of the Ashkenazi line.
I agree with you on the calculators regarding diversity in the Portuguese people as well DNA that MyOrigins is picking up being possibly thousands of years old. That is what I was trying to point out in my post about the Jewish Diaspora. As these Jews Migrated through the Northern Mediterranean on their way to the Iberian Peninsula,They likely picked up some DNA through intermarriage. That would explain Italy,Greece ETC. The same with the Jews who migrated along the Northern coast of Africa,When the Muslim Moors from North Africa Conquered Southern Iberia, North African Jews came with them along with DNA that had picked up there. That would explain the Libyan Jew and Moroccan Jew and North African that shows up. Now the Jews who went east to Mesopotamia/Iraq/South West Asia would only match to the Jewish DNA, but that would still explain a distant connection. As for the Ashkenazi there are two possible routes to connect :1 the connection prior the split in Italy when the group who would become Sheparim Migrated west to Iberia and the group who would become Askenazi and (also inbred due to their small numbers) moved into eastern Europe and the Baltic States. This would explain Serbian,Bosnian,Romanian ETC. This group would bounce back and force between Eastern Europe and Western Europe due to persecution. The Ashkenazi were at times in France, Belgium and the Netherlands. Flanders which borders France,Netherlands and makes up the Northwest of Belgium is where the Flemings come from. :2 here is the second connection to the Askenazi for the Azores, And it would explain some of the European Countries and Baltic States that show up.
Yep, that's what I was told.
Cheri
--
--
| # | Population | Percent |
| 1 | European_Early_Farmers | 33.30 |
| 2 | Caucasian | 24.06 |
| 3 | European_Hunters_Gatherers | 22.60 |
| 4 | North_African | 5.35 |
| 5 | Near_East | 4.67 |
| 6 | South_Central_Asian | 3.74 |
| 7 | Ancestral_Altaic | 2.59 |