Re: What should be the Christian Response?
yumhuyk
> What should be the Christian Response?
>
> Most of what we could write here is the same as what we've written in
> regards to other genre's including Magic and fantasy role playing
> games. Admittedly, this is a lighter variation than most of the
> others, but that doesn't make it right.
>
> Proverbs 13:2b ... but the unfaithful have a craving for violence.
> (NIV)
>
> How much violence, how much focus on fighting, how much greed, how
> much mysticism and how many anti-biblical supernatural themes are you
> going to allow? If something is wrong, it's wrong on a little scale as
> well as a large (that's like thinking there's a difference between a
> little lie and a big one!). If God condemns as wrong psychic powers
> and mystic abilities ("magic" by any other name), can we say that a
> little of it is only a little wrong? Of course not! (See Revelation
> 21:8, 22:15)
>
> 1 Peter 1:15-16 But just as he who called you is holy, so be holy
> in all you do; for it is written: "Be holy, because I am holy." (NIV)
> See also Ephesians 1:4, Revelation 22:11,
>
> Hebrews 12:14b ... without holiness no one will see the Lord.
> (NIV) See also 2 Timothy 2:19
>
> The question at hand is, "are we, or are we not, called to be a holy
> people?" The Bible answers that question with a resounding "yes!" We
> are to be holy in thought and in deed.
>
> 1 Corinthians 10:31b ... whatever you do, do it all for the glory
> of God. (NIV)
>
> 1 Thessalonians 5:20-22 Test everything. Hold on to the good.
> Avoid every kind of evil. (NIV) See also Romans 12:9
>
> Are we willing to control what we are feeding to our thoughts? Are we
> as parents willing to control what our children are feeding their
> thoughts (consider Proverbs 22:6)? Are we responsible for raising our
> children to do what is right?
>
> Philippians 4:8-9 Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is
> noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely,
> whatever is admirable-if anything is excellent or praiseworthy-think
> about such things. Whatever you have learned or received or heard from
> me, or seen in me-put it into practice... (NIV)
>
> 2 Corinthians 10:4-5 We demolish arguments and every pretension
> that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive
> every thought to make it obedient to Christ. (NIV) See also Matthew
> 18:8-9
>
> Matthew 22:37-38 Jesus replied: "`Love the Lord your God with all
> your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the
> first and greatest commandment. (NIV)
>
> As Christians we have no choice here. God has commanded us clearly in
> what we are to do. To do anything less is sin.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> We're all going to hell then, when it comes to Magic!
> Because the computers we use, are also known as a form of magic in the
> bible.
>
> All they really are, is a system which can switch small currents of
> electricity
> back and forth.
> But parts of the Bible still calls them evil.
> Nearly everything in movie making, could be referred to as some sort
> of magic.
> ILM and Lucas Films.
> Many corporations which make movies, can be looked at as Magic.
>
> Nearly anything and everything we do in the course of a single day
> could
> be considered a sin. The way most Christians I meet talk, they act as
> though
> there is no sin in Jesus.
> That's missing the point. Jesus died, so we can sin. Our job is to try
> not to sin.
> There's no way in hell, you can live an entire day, without sinning.
>
> I hope that christian that comes on here reads this, because it's more
> for him then the rest of you all.
>
> Fievel. ;-) :-)
The problem is not that people sin, but that you make no attempt to
avoid sin, and in fact claim that things which are obviously sins
aren't. God does not want you to fornicate with plushed animals.
God does not need romantic vampire fiction. It does not make me
judgemental to point out that Jesus does not approve, for its
ultimately he who will judge.
yours in Christ,
isamu
womanGoddess
And you OC know what God thinks right Yukkie?
BTW why all the cross posts? Being a troll again Yukkie?
As for whether or not Jesus would approve, I would not trust the word
of an anti-semite and racist like you about such a matter. Assuming
that Jesus existed in the first place, he, being human, died long ago
and naturally would not have any idea about the current vampire genre.
Assuming for a moment that Christians are right in that Jesus Christ
still lives, whatever He has to say about the subject, He certainly
can say so Himself, not rely upon scum like you to speak for Him.
BTW there are Christian authors writing vampire fiction.
And you, Yukkie, certainly do not speak for all Christians.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Greegor
Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
Ala
"yumhuyk" <wost...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24e53ece-e4ff-4ef4...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
Still I don't suppose God would have a problem with using them as a food
source. Could you scan some recipes and upload them
womanGoddess
> Moe > God does not want you to fornicate with plushed animals.
I never said that. Yukkie did. And I certainly am not Yukkie.
>
> Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
Nope. There are a number of subjects that make me angry but not what
Yukkie posted.
What sets you off? Strong women who don't bow to your abuse?
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Greegor
animals.
G > Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
Moe > Nope. There are a number of subjects that make
Moe > me angry but not what Yukkie posted.
Moe >
Moe > What sets you off?
Moe > Strong women who don't bow to your abuse?
The "Woman's Poem" - The Milton Show 1:19
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaAwqPLYWas
Milton singing "The Man Song" by Sean Morey 1:53
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7Y0I91rubg
The WOMAN Song! lyrics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmuqq729DPM
yumhuyk
> On Feb 2, 9:25 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Moe > God does not want you to fornicate with plushed animals.
>
> I never said that. Yukkie did. And I certainly am not Yukkie.
>
>
>
> > Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
>
> Nope. There are a number of subjects that make me angry but not what
> Yukkie posted.
Hit a little too close to home, eh? Do you or your boifriend wear the
fursuit when you "yiff"?
> What sets you off? Strong women who don't bow to your abuse?
Yes, because women must submit to their husband, who is the lord of
the household.
yours in Christ,
isamu
Greegor
Moe, The anagram troll is posing as an off the
deep end Christian. He's acting out a
"straw man" of the target of his disdain.
I suspect it's Kent and I suspect you know this.
I told you a long time ago this is the anagram troll.
Why do you feed it?
Did you REALLY believe he is a Bob Larson fan?
Be honest.
womanGoddess
> On Feb 3, 7:07 pm, yumhuyk <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 11:01 pm, womanGoddess <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 2, 9:25 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Moe > God does not want you to fornicate with plushed animals.
>
> > > I never said that. Yukkie did. And I certainly am not Yukkie.
>
> > > > Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
>
> > > Nope. There are a number of subjects that make me angry but not what
> > > Yukkie posted.
>
> > Hit a little too close to home, eh? Do you or your boifriend wear the
> > fursuit when you "yiff"?
>
> > > What sets you off? Strong women who don't bow to your abuse?
>
> > Yes, because women must submit to their husband, who is the lord of
> > the household.
>
> > yours in Christ,
> > isamu
>
> Moe, The anagram troll is posing as an off the
> deep end Christian. He's acting out a
> "straw man" of the target of his disdain.
>
> I suspect it's Kent and I suspect you know this.
Do I?
You can "suspect" whateve rthe hell you want Greg, just as I can
suspect you of collaborating with someone pretending to be a well-
known poster. Suspect is nothing. However PROOF is another matter.
Say you or a friend of yours hacked a computer of your target. Say
that computer was set up to have " bait" for a hacker to take. Said
bait would be at a level where most hackers would never discover and
thusly stay in the computer. Say a law enforcement agency like the BI
comes to investigate a complaint and finds said bait in your computer
or in the computer of your hacker buddy.
Guess what WILL happen in a situation like that Greg.
And greg, do you think I would stand by and do nothing personally to
you if such an attack happened on my computer?
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>
Firemonkey
>
>
>
>
>
> > I told you a long time ago this is the anagram troll.
>
> > Why do you feed it?
>
> > Did you REALLY believe he is a Bob Larson fan?
>
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Moe it was me that sent you the private reply
Greegor
Y > God does not want you to fornicate with plushed animals.
G > Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
Moe > Nope. There are a number of subjects that
Moe > make me angry but not what Yukkie posted.
Y > Hit a little too close to home, eh? Do you or your
Y > boifriend wear the fursuit when you "yiff"?
Moe > What sets you off? Strong women
Moe > who don't bow to your abuse?
Y > Yes, because women must submit to their
Y > husband, who is the lord of the household.
G > Moe, The anagram troll is posing as an off the
G > deep end Christian. He's acting out a
G > "straw man" of the target of his disdain.
G >
G > I suspect it's Kent and I suspect you know this.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/2caff66d2c1528db
Moe > Do I?
Moe >
Moe > You can "suspect" whateve the hell
Moe > you want Greg, just as I can suspect
Moe > you of collaborating with someone
Moe > pretending to be a well-known poster.
Moe > Suspect is nothing. However PROOF
Moe > is another matter.
Moe >
Moe > Say you or a friend of yours hacked a
Moe > computer of your target. Say that
Moe > computer was set up to have " bait"
Moe > for a hacker to take. Said bait would
Moe > be at a level where most hackers
Moe > would never discover and thusly
Moe > stay in the computer. Say a law
Moe > enforcement agency like the BI
Moe > comes to investigate a complaint and
Moe > finds said bait in your computer
Moe > or in the computer of your hacker buddy.
Moe >
Moe > Guess what WILL happen in a situation
Moe > like that Greg.
Moe > And greg, do you think I would stand by and
Moe > do nothing personally to you if such an
Moe > attack happened on my computer?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/3ee32c7faf25938a
FM > Moe it was me that sent you the private reply
ROFL Dumb shits!
womanGoddess
Which I DID NOT WANT!!!
Nice little hacking bait attempt.
BTW you never answered my question, did you?
womanGoddess
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> Y > God does not want you to fornicate with plushed animals.
>
> G > Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
>
> Moe > Nope. There are a number of subjects that
> Moe > make me angry but not what Yukkie posted.
>
> Y > Hit a little too close to home, eh? Do you or your
> Y > boifriend wear the fursuit when you "yiff"?
>
> Moe > What sets you off? Strong women
> Moe > who don't bow to your abuse?
>
> Y > Yes, because women must submit to their
> Y > husband, who is the lord of the household.
>
> G > Moe, The anagram troll is posing as an off the
> G > deep end Christian. He's acting out a
> G > "straw man" of the target of his disdain.
> G >
> G > I suspect it's Kent and I suspect you know this.
>
>
> FM > Moe it was me that sent you the private reply
>
> ROFL Dumb shits!
Thanks for acknowledging that FM is your hacker buddy.
Nice " coincidence" you two are on at the same time.
forevernitefan
>
> > On Feb 2, 9:25 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Moe > God does not want you to fornicate with plushed animals.
>
> > I never said that. Yukkie did. And I certainly am not Yukkie.
>
> > > Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
>
> > Nope. There are a number of subjects that make me angry but not what
> > Yukkie posted.
>
> Hit a little too close to home, eh? Do you or your boifriend wear the
> fursuit when you "yiff"?
What are you talking about? Seriously, I have no clue what the hell
you are referring to.
Not that it matters, really because you are a troll, a dumb one at
that.
>
> > What sets you off? Strong women who don't bow to your abuse?
>
> Yes, because women must submit to their husband, who is the lord of
> the household.
According to the Bible, which I do not follow. Interestingly that was
Paul's teachings, not Jesus'. Wasn't it Jesus who said there was
neither male nor female but all are one in Christ Jesus. Also it is
sadly human nature if one submits totally to another person, that
person will tend to abuse the relationship.
One time while I was volunteering at the battered women's shelter I
overheard a woman who was abused by her husband use those Bible
quotes. She couldn't reconcile the abuse she received by her bible-
quoting spouse to the real pain she was suffering and the fear that
if she resisted or got away she might be damned by Biblegod. Mister
Righteous thought it was ": god's will:" that he beat her into
submission. Fortunately for her the counselor found for her a fellow
Christian to guide her away from the submission/damned mentality so
she kept her faith but changed it to a more healthy attitude about
women and relationships.
Sadly there are many case of devout Xian women who believed the
submit to the male as head of the household crap and were murdered for
it by their spouses.
So Yukkie it doesn't surprise me you would think that way. It fits on
with your other bigotries.
>
> yours in Christ,
> isamu
Moe
Pagan and Proud of it.
Firemonkey
>
> - Show quoted text -
I am nor have I ever been a buddy of grags, not for the three years
since he has been stalking and harrassing my daughter and I.
womanGoddess
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> you.
> It was not a hacking bait attempt at all and I and surprised you see
> it as that.
> That grag and I were logged in at the same time was a coincidence, so
> is us both living in the same state as Kent.
And what state would that be M?
By " us" whom are you referring to?
forevernitefan
So you claim.
Here's a question for you:
Where is Kent and Dan? How is it THEY are no longer posting?
Somebody's been doing some dirty tricks, way beyond what they should
do. And greg's home is well known.
Firemonkey
>
> - Show quoted text -
Kent said he was going on vacation, along with Dave. I don't remember
when he said they were going, and Dan, I don't know. Send him an email
and ask.
I have some ideas about what has been going on but will not talk about
it it the group. You can email me for more information if you want, or
not.
Greegor
G > Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
Moe > Nope. There are a number of subjects that
Moe > make me angry but not what Yukkie posted.
Y > Hit a little too close to home, eh? Do you or your
Y > boifriend wear the fursuit when you "yiff"?
Moe > What sets you off? Strong women
Moe > who don't bow to your abuse?
Y > Yes, because women must submit to their
Y > husband, who is the lord of the household.
G > Moe, The anagram troll is posing as an off the
G > deep end Christian. He's acting out a
G > "straw man" of the target of his disdain.
G >
G > I suspect it's Kent and I suspect you know this.
Moe > Do I?
FM > Moe it was me that sent you the private reply
How could it be that Moe would not KNOW that?
G > ROFL Dumb shits!
Moe > Thanks for acknowledging that FM is your hacker buddy.
Your ""good buddy"" Davey is only a script kiddy.
You think it takes an actual hacker to spread a virus?
Moe > Nice " coincidence" you two are on
Moe > at the same time.
FM > I am nor have I ever been a buddy of grags,
FM > not for the three years since he has been
FM > stalking and harrassing my daughter and I.
Moe > So you claim.
Moe > Here's a question for you:
Moe > Where is Kent and Dan?
Moe > How is it THEY are no longer posting?
ROFL You're asking?
Moe > Somebody's been doing some dirty tricks,
Moe > way beyond what they should do.
Moe > And greg's home is well known.
So they're up to something and didn't tell you, Moe?
Even you good buddy Kent? LOL
This notion of an interstate conspiracy is amusing.
I loved the ""casual"" mention of Kent
living in Iowa.
You're not getting any academy award
for your dramatic performance.
It's funny but just not believable.
FM > Kent said he was going on vacation, along with
FM > Dave. I don't remember when he said they
FM > were going, and Dan, I don't know. Send him
FM > an email and ask.
FM >
FM > I have some ideas about what has been going
FM > on but will not talk about it it the group. You
FM > can email me for more information if you
FM > want, or not.
FM > Moe it was me that sent you the private reply
Moe > Which I DID NOT WANT!!!
Moe > Nice little hacking bait attempt.
Moe >
Moe > BTW you never answered my question, did you?
ROFL!
FM > I apoligise, I was sharing information I thought
FM > would be valuble to you.
FM > It was not a hacking bait attempt at all and
FM > I and surprised you see it as that.
FM > That grag and I were logged in at the same
FM > time was a coincidence, so is us both
FM > living in the same state as Kent.
Moe > And what state would that be M?
Moe > By " us" whom are you referring to?
ROFL!
Moe [ To Yumhuyk Isamu the anagram troll ]
> According to the Bible, which I do not follow. Interestingly that was
> Paul's teachings, not Jesus'. Wasn't it Jesus who said there was
> neither male nor female but all are one in Christ Jesus. Also it is
> sadly human nature if one submits totally to another person, that
> person will tend to abuse the relationship.
Moe > One time while I was volunteering
Moe > at the battered women's shelter
ROFL! What a surprise! LOL
> I overheard a woman who was abused by her husband use those Bible
> quotes. She couldn't reconcile the abuse she received by her bible-
> quoting spouse to the real pain she was suffering and the fear that
> if she resisted or got away she might be damned by Biblegod. Mister
> Righteous thought it was ": god's will:" that he beat her into
> submission. Fortunately for her the counselor found for her a fellow
> Christian to guide her away from the submission/damned mentality so
> she kept her faith but changed it to a more healthy attitude about
> women and relationships.
>
> Sadly there are many case of devout Xian women who believed the
> submit to the male as head of the household crap and were murdered for
> it by their spouses.
>
Moe > So Yukkie it doesn't surprise me you would
Moe > think that way. It fits on with your other bigotries.
Yumhuyk Isamu is a STRAW MAN, a chiche'
presented as a PLOY by somebody like Kent
to attract your bitchy comments toward a
characature of somebody they do not like.
Ye Gads you are stupid Moe!
Are you somebody's STRAW MAN ?
Y > yours in Christ,
Y > isamu
Moe > Moe
Moe > Pagan and Proud of it.
That's what makes you such an easy
target for Yumhuyk Isamu.
You said he's a spammer troll three days
ago yet you go on feeding the troll!
What an idiot!
forevernitefan
following:
I got an email from a Gmail account, dumbass.
>
> G > ROFL Dumb shits!
>
> Moe > Thanks for acknowledging that FM is your hacker buddy.
>
> Your ""good buddy"" Davey is only a script kiddy.
> You think it takes an actual hacker to spread a virus?
Are you admitting to something Greg?
BTW you would not have known what a script kiddie was until after I
posted the definition.
Also " genius" the alleged hacking attempts are NOT viruses but were
detected on other levels, levels more sophisticated than a damn script
kiddie.
As for " Davey", why should he supposedly hack anything? Other than
Kennie's usual lying claim that his web sites were infected with a
virus and he blamed it on Moore, what Moore has done does not classify
as hacking of any sort. The end result is that Kennie lost his recent
ISP and that thankfully he no longer is on usenet, though he plays the
pity act on his private list.
>
> Moe > Nice " coincidence" you two are on
> Moe > at the same time.
>
> FM > I am nor have I ever been a buddy of grags,
> FM > not for the three years since he has been
> FM > stalking and harrassing my daughter and I.
>
> Moe > So you claim.
> Moe > Here's a question for you:
>
> Moe > Where is Kent and Dan?
> Moe > How is it THEY are no longer posting?
>
> ROFL You're asking?
Yes I am. And the answer is?
>
> Moe > Somebody's been doing some dirty tricks,
> Moe > way beyond what they should do.
>
> Moe > And greg's home is well known.
>
> So they're up to something and didn't tell you, Moe?
Nope, More like both Wills and Sullivan are on, oh, whatis that
called, VACATIONS.
You know, the breaks from employment while still being employed.
You DO know what being employed IS, right Greg?
>
> Even you good buddy Kent? LOL
He's on vacation.
Worried about something Greg?
>
> This notion of an interstate conspiracy is amusing.
Oh you mean liek what your buddy Kennie tried to pass off for a
decade or more about Moore and a few other people who rightly disliked
his fat ass?
There is not conspiracy except in your chemically affected mind.
>
> I loved the ""casual"" mention of Kent
> living in Iowa.
Which you supposedly knew for years. Heck, last year you made one of
your usual gutless insinuations about looking for Kent at a court
hearing. Then you, as usual for a coward like you, made excuses when
he showed up and you didn't.
But then in the past you accused me of being Kent when it is clear we
are tow different people.
>
> You're not getting any academy award
> for your dramatic performance.
Greg, your delusions aside, I am not making a "dramatic
performance". I stand by what I have posted.
>
> It's funny but just not believable.
A lot of what you claim is not believable, Greg.
>
> FM > Kent said he was going on vacation, along with
> FM > Dave. I don't remember when he said they
> FM > were going, and Dan, I don't know. Send him
> FM > an email and ask.
> FM >
> FM > I have some ideas about what has been going
> FM > on but will not talk about it it the group. You
> FM > can email me for more information if you
> FM > want, or not.
>
> FM > Moe it was me that sent you the private reply
>
> Moe > Which I DID NOT WANT!!!
> Moe > Nice little hacking bait attempt.
> Moe >
> Moe > BTW you never answered my question, did you?
>
> ROFL!
Improper usage of laughter noted.
>
> FM > I apoligise, I was sharing information I thought
> FM > would be valuble to you.
> FM > It was not a hacking bait attempt at all and
> FM > I and surprised you see it as that.
> FM > That grag and I were logged in at the same
> FM > time was a coincidence, so is us both
> FM > living in the same state as Kent.
>
> Moe > And what state would that be M?
> Moe > By " us" whom are you referring to?
>
> ROFL!
Improper usage of laughter noted. And possibly from greg's
nervousness as well.
>
> Moe [ To Yumhuyk Isamu the anagram troll ]
What is the " anagram"? Serious question greg.
>
> > According to the Bible, which I do not follow. Interestingly that was
> > Paul's teachings, not Jesus'. Wasn't it Jesus who said there was
> > neither male nor female but all are one in Christ Jesus. Also it is
> > sadly human nature if one submits totally to another person, that
> > person will tend to abuse the relationship.
>
> Moe > One time while I was volunteering
> Moe > at the battered women's shelter
>
> ROFL! What a surprise! LOL
Nope. Unlike you I actually give a damn for actual victims, not
pretend victims like you try to make yourself out to be.
I had various reasons for volunteering at the shelter, none of which
I choose to "share" with an abusive bastard like you.
There are people very different from you, people who care about
others, people who are willing to lend out a helping hand or even have
a sympathetic ear for others. That is alien to you, I know.
>
> > I overheard a woman who was abused by her husband use those Bible
> > quotes. She couldn't reconcile the abuse she received by her bible-
> > quoting spouse to the real pain she was suffering and the fear that
> > if she resisted or got away she might be damned by Biblegod. Mister
> > Righteous thought it was ": god's will:" that he beat her into
> > submission. Fortunately for her the counselor found for her a fellow
> > Christian to guide her away from the submission/damned mentality so
> > she kept her faith but changed it to a more healthy attitude about
> > women and relationships.
>
> > Sadly there are many case of devout Xian women who believed the
> > submit to the male as head of the household crap and were murdered for
> > it by their spouses.
>
> Moe > So Yukkie it doesn't surprise me you would
> Moe > think that way. It fits on with your other bigotries.
>
> Yumhuyk Isamu is a STRAW MAN, a chiche'
Its spelled cliche, Greg.
> presented as a PLOY by somebody like Kent
> to attract your bitchy comments toward a
> characature of somebody they do not like.
Yumhuyuk is a troll, that is all I am willing to reveal so far. It
is NOT Kent, no matter what your obsession about him may say
otherwise.
>
> Ye Gads you are stupid Moe!
Actually no I am not stupid. I am, however, not the drama queen you
obviously are and your reasoning faculties, hampered by chemical
abuse, are at best childish and would actually be laughable if it came
out of a character, not a sad pathetic real person as you are.
>
> Are you somebody's STRAW MAN ?
I am female, not male.
Missing your master Greg?
>
> Y > yours in Christ,
> Y > isamu
>
> Moe > Moe
> Moe > Pagan and Proud of it.
>
> That's what makes you such an easy
> target for Yumhuyk Isamu.
Greg, in all honesty I've BEEN an " easy target" for assorted
assholes for more than twenty YEARS because of my religion. Yukkie is
pathetic in whatever he is trying to do. He's a weakling compared to
what self-righteous Xians I had the misfortune to encounter in my
life.
The only relevance Yukkie has with me is the amusement factor.
>
> You said he's a spammer troll three days
> ago yet you go on feeding the troll!
And yet you get pleasure out of me' feeding" YOU, Greg and you are no
different than Yukkie.
Jealous?
>
> What an idiot!
Yes you both are idiots but I thought it was too obvious for me to
mention that.
Moe
Pagan and Proud
Greegor
womanGoddess
> Moe, You are your own worst enemy.
Gee jealous?
Moe
Greegor47
032f00...@d27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:
>> quoting 嚙編pouse to the real pain she was suffering and the fear that
>> if she resisted or got away she might be damned by Biblegod. 嚙瞎ister
>> Righteous thought it was ": god's will:" that he beat her into
>> submission. 嚙瘤ortunately for her the counselor found for her a fellow
>> Christian to guide her away from the submission/damned mentality so
>> she kept her faith but changed it to a more healthy attitude about
>> women and relationships.
>>
>> 嚙磅adly there are many case of devout Xian women who believed the
>> submit to the male as head of the household crap and were murdered
for
>> it by their spouses.
>>
> Moe > So Yukkie it doesn't surprise me you would
> Moe > think that way. It fits on with your other bigotries.
>
> Yumhuyk Isamu is a STRAW MAN, a chiche'
> presented as a PLOY by somebody like Kent
> to attract your bitchy comments toward a
> characature of somebody they do not like.
>
> Ye Gads you are stupid Moe!
>
> Are you somebody's STRAW MAN ?
>
> Y > yours in Christ,
> Y > isamu
>
> Moe > 嚙瞎oe
> Moe > 嚙瞑agan and Proud of it.
>
> That's what makes you such an easy
> target for Yumhuyk Isamu.
>
> You said he's a spammer troll three days
> ago yet you go on feeding the troll!
>
> What an idiot!
>
Why do you molest children, Grag?
Kent Wills
>Moe > God does not want you to fornicate with plushed animals.
>
>Is this the part that set you off, Moe?
First, Moe and Yukkie are not the same person, stupid.
Second, your question implies you do fornicate with plushed
animals, Greg.
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Monday, February 1, 2010:
Financials
Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT
Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN)
Citation Number:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.
Me: Hey, he used your standards.
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson: It's textbook psychopathic
reasoning.
Greg admitting his standards are psychopathic.
In MID
<2afdd85e-3b16-4829...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
Greg makes it clear he thinks reality TV shows are fantasy.
Kent Wills
[...]
>> FM > Moe it was me that sent you the private reply
>>
>> ROFL �Dumb shits!
>
>Thanks for acknowledging that FM is your hacker buddy.
>
> Nice " coincidence" you two are on at the same time.
I don't know what you were sent, but I can assure you the real FM
didn't send you anything malicious.
At the risk of appearing to insult her (which is NOT my intent),
FM won't know how to go about doing such a thing.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>> FM > Moe it was me that sent you the private reply
>>
>> How could it be that Moe would not KNOW that?
>
> I got an email from a Gmail account, dumbass.
>
>>
>> G > ROFL �Dumb shits!
>>
>> Moe > Thanks for acknowledging that FM is your hacker buddy.
>>
>> Your ""good buddy"" Davey is only a script kiddy.
>> You think it takes an actual hacker to spread a virus?
>
> Are you admitting to something Greg?
By Greg's standards, he is.
>
> BTW you would not have known what a script kiddie was until after I
>posted the definition.
Greg likes to pretend he's a big bad hacker. Of course, his
mental retardation (it's NOT an act) means he can't be one.
>
> Also " genius" the alleged hacking attempts are NOT viruses but were
>detected on other levels, levels more sophisticated than a damn script
>kiddie.
>
> As for " Davey", why should he supposedly hack anything?
He wouldn't. David is able to get dirt without the need to hack
anything.
>Other than
>Kennie's usual lying claim that his web sites were infected with a
>virus and he blamed it on Moore, what Moore has done does not classify
>as hacking of any sort. The end result is that Kennie lost his recent
>ISP and that thankfully he no longer is on usenet, though he plays the
>pity act on his private list.
I'm still waiting for law enforcement to arrest me, and David,
for it. He made it very clear on his listserv that it was going to
happen very soon.
>
>>
>> Moe > Nice " coincidence" you two are on
>> Moe > at the same time.
>>
>> FM > I am nor have I ever been a buddy of grags,
>> FM > not for the three years since he has been
>> FM > stalking and harrassing my daughter and I.
>>
>> Moe > �So you claim.
>> Moe > �Here's a question for you:
>>
>> Moe > Where is Kent and Dan?
>> Moe > How is it THEY are no longer posting?
>>
>> ROFL � You're asking?
>
> Yes I am. And the answer is?
I have no explanation for Dan. He is not posting for reason
unknown to me.
I wasn't because of the cable going goofy.
Yes, I could have used the WiFi and satellite connection, but
getting on-line wasn't and isn't that important.
>
>>
>> Moe > Somebody's been doing some dirty tricks,
>> Moe > way beyond what they should do.
>>
>> Moe > And greg's home is well known.
>>
>> So they're up to something and didn't tell you, Moe?
>
> Nope, More like both Wills and Sullivan are on, oh, whatis that
>called, VACATIONS.
That could be why Dan isn't posting. And there is precedent to
suspect that's why I wasn't.
>
> You know, the breaks from employment while still being employed.
>
> You DO know what being employed IS, right Greg?
Greg owes so much money to so many people that he doesn't dare
get a job. The risk that the bulk of his pay being garnished to pay
his obligations is too high for Greg.
Heck, he still owes over $8000.00 for his convictions for BEATING
his ex-wife.
>
>>
>> Even you good buddy Kent? � LOL
>
> He's on vacation.
> Worried about something Greg?
Maybe he was worried that I finally accepted his offer to come to
the Cedar Rapids area and meet him.
>
>>
>> This notion of an interstate conspiracy is amusing.
>
> Oh you mean liek what your buddy Kennie tried to pass off for a
>decade or more about Moore and a few other people who rightly disliked
>his fat ass?
>
> There is not conspiracy except in your chemically affected mind.
As far as I can tell, Greg doesn't really think there is a
conspiracy out to get him. Ken clearly does.
>
>>
>> I loved the ""casual"" mention of Kent
>> living in Iowa.
>
> Which you supposedly knew for years. Heck, last year you made one of
>your usual gutless insinuations about looking for Kent at a court
>hearing. Then you, as usual for a coward like you, made excuses when
>he showed up and you didn't.
Greg's real brave on-line, but if there is a chance of a real
life meeting, even in a place as safe as the Polk County courthouse,
Greg shows himself to be the sniveling little coward he is.
>
> But then in the past you accused me of being Kent when it is clear we
>are tow different people.
Greg either proved he has Fregoli, or proved he is
psychologically UNABLE to be honest.
He's yet to admit which is the one.
>
>>
>> You're not getting any academy award
>> for your dramatic performance.
>
> Greg, your delusions aside, I am not making a "dramatic
>performance". I stand by what I have posted.
>
>>
>> It's funny but just not believable.
>
> A lot of what you claim is not believable, Greg.
A lot of what Greg claims are outright lies.
[...]
>
>>
>> FM > I apoligise, I was sharing information I thought
>> FM > would be valuble to you.
>> FM > It was not a hacking bait attempt at all and
>> FM > I and surprised you see it as that.
>> FM > That grag and I were logged in at the same
>> FM > time was a coincidence, so is us both
>> FM > living in the same state as Kent.
>>
>> Moe > And what state would that be M?
>> Moe > By " us" whom are you referring to?
>>
>> ROFL!
>
> Improper usage of laughter noted. And possibly from greg's
>nervousness as well.
Greg is psychologically UNABLE to give an honest answer. He's
starting to catch on that his lies are being exposed. This limits
what he can offer in the way of a reply.
>
>>
>> Moe [ To Yumhuyk Isamu the anagram troll ]
>
> What is the " anagram"? Serious question greg.
Greg will never answer, since he can't. Not without another lie
being exposed.
>
>>
>> > According to the Bible, which I do not follow. Interestingly that was
>> > Paul's teachings, not Jesus'. Wasn't it Jesus who said there was
>> > neither male nor female but all are one in Christ Jesus. Also it is
>> > sadly human nature if one submits totally to another person, that
>> > person will tend to abuse the relationship.
>>
>> Moe > One time while I was volunteering
>> Moe > at the battered women's shelter
>>
>> ROFL! � What a surprise! � LOL
>
> Nope. Unlike you I actually give a damn for actual victims, not
>pretend victims like you try to make yourself out to be.
Greg has a psychological NEED to be a victim.
>
> I had various reasons for volunteering at the shelter, none of which
>I choose to "share" with an abusive bastard like you.
Whatever those reasons are, and they are none of our business,
they were and are valid.
>
> There are people very different from you, people who care about
>others, people who are willing to lend out a helping hand or even have
>a sympathetic ear for others. That is alien to you, I know.
Greg is so messed up that he honestly thinks the only person who
matters is himself. The idea of showing compassion for another is
impossible for Greg.
[...]
>
> Yumhuyuk is a troll, that is all I am willing to reveal so far. It
>is NOT Kent, no matter what your obsession about him may say
>otherwise.
>
In Greg's mind, I am everyone. It's either Fregoli, or his
psychological INABILITY to be honest.
>>
>> Ye Gads you are stupid Moe!
>
> Actually no I am not stupid. I am, however, not the drama queen you
>obviously are and your reasoning faculties, hampered by chemical
>abuse, are at best childish and would actually be laughable if it came
>out of a character, not a sad pathetic real person as you are.
>
>>
>> Are you somebody's STRAW MAN ?
>
> I am female, not male.
>
> Missing your master Greg?
Ken probably E-mails Greg from time to time. While Ken authors
some of Greg's posts, he's not alone.
[...]
>
>>
>> You said he's a spammer troll three days
>> ago yet you go on feeding the troll!
>
> And yet you get pleasure out of me' feeding" YOU, Greg and you are no
>different than Yukkie.
>
> Jealous?
>
>>
>> What an idiot!
>
> Yes you both are idiots but I thought it was too obvious for me to
>mention that.
Greg is unable to spot the obvious most of the time. The mental
retardation he displays on-line is NOT an act. His admitted use and
abuse of illegal drugs has lowered his already abysmal IQ.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>> > �Nice " coincidence" you two are on at the same time.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> I am nor have I ever been a buddy of grags, not for the three years
>> since he has been stalking and harrassing my daughter and I.
>
> So you claim.
While you and I have had our disagreements, we've never lied to
each other.
I can assure you, the real FireMonkey wouldn't send you anything
harmful. Further, she wouldn't try to hack your system. It's not in
her nature, and it's beyond her knowledge. I don't mean that as
insulting as it appears in print.
> Here's a question for you:
>
> Where is Kent and Dan? How is it THEY are no longer posting?
The cable went goofy. I couldn't get on-line, and the hook-up to
the HD TV in the toy room ceased working as well. The SD signal to
the computer room wasn't effected. The TVs with satellite were not
effected, of course.
Obviously it's working now.
Actually, everything started working at some point yesterday.
When we left, it was out. When The Princess and I got home, it was
working.
>
> Somebody's been doing some dirty tricks, way beyond what they should
>do. And greg's home is well known.
But Greg lacks the intellectual stimulation necessary to do
anything you present. In this case, his mental retardation is an
indication of his vindication. Greg is, quite honestly, too stupid
to do it.
However, he has "friends" who can. I dropped a hint not too long
ago about whom I suspect (a certain defoliate agent that was found to
cause all sorts of problems). It's the same person who has once again
began authoring Greg's posts.
Kent Wills
[...]
>> > Moe it was me that sent you the private reply
>>
>> �Which I DID NOT WANT!!!
>> � Nice little hacking bait attempt.
>>
>> �BTW you never answered my question, did you?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>I apoligise, I was sharing information I thought would be valuble to
>you.
>It was not a hacking bait attempt at all and I and surprised you see
>it as that.
>That grag and I were logged in at the same time was a coincidence, so
>is us both living in the same state as Kent.
But Greg has claimed I live in several different states. Iowa is
only one of them.
Kent Wills
[...]
>> > I am nor have I ever been a buddy of grags, not for the three years
>> > since he has been stalking and harrassing my daughter and I.
>>
>> �So you claim.
>> �Here's a question for you:
>>
>> �Where is Kent and Dan? How is it THEY are no longer posting?
>>
>> �Somebody's been doing some dirty tricks, way beyond what they should
>> do. And greg's home is well known.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Kent said he was going on vacation, along with Dave. I don't remember
>when he said they were going, and Dan, I don't know. Send him an email
>and ask.
There is a precedent that would allow people to think I'm on
vacation while school is in session.
The unofficial rule with the school district is that anyone may
go on vacation at any time, so long as they are willing to pay 100% of
the cost associated with the substitute teacher. I've done this
twice.
However, this is not one of those cases. The cable went goofy
and it took a few days for the PTB to find and correct the problem.
--
Death: Weight doesn't come into it. My steed has carried armies. My
steed has carried cities. Yea, he hath carried all things in their due
time. But he's not going to carry you three.
War: Why not?
Death: It's a matter of the look of the thing.
War: It's going to look pretty good, then, isn't it, the One Horseman
and Three Pedestrians of the Apocalypse.
(from Sourcery, by Terry Pratchett)
Kent Wills
[...]
>> You said he's a spammer troll three days
>> ago yet you go on feeding the troll!
>>
>> What an idiot!
>>
>
>Why do you molest children, Grag?
By Greg's own standards, it was proved he molested at least one
little girl.
Of course, Greg has some very odd standards that mentally sound
people wouldn't use, save to point out how off the wall they are.
Greegor
> Why do you molest children, Grag?
That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
Greegor
BSG > Why do you molest children, Grag?
That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Kent Wills
As you already KNOW, I don't have an account with Eternal
September. I've never had an account with Eternal September, and have
no plans on getting one. As such, you KNOW I didn't post that which
your deeply rooted psychological NEED to lie forced you to claim I
did.
How long will we have to wait for you to PROVE you know it wasn't
and isn't me? You'll recall the posts with the nyms from the movie
"Hackers." When I asked Ken to prove his claim that I was the poster
or admit he was wrong, you stated I offered a no win situation (not a
verbatim quote, but the context is 100%).
Will you slip and make it clear that you KNOW it's not me, just
like you did then?
You never did tell the readers who the person was that used the
lame nyms. Since you made it clear you KNEW it wasn't me, it only
makes sense that you knew who it was. Why not tell me, and anyone
else reading, just who it was.
Greegor
> Why do you molest children, Grag?
G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
KBW > account with Eternal September.
How could I possibly KNOW that?
KBW > I've never had an account with Eternal September,
KBW > and have no plans on getting one.
Isn't that just another name for Motzarella?
KBW > As such, you KNOW I didn't post that
KBW > which your deeply rooted psychological
KBW > NEED to lie forced you to claim I did.
All I said was:
G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
How did you read so much into that?
> How long will we have to wait for you to PROVE you know it wasn't
> and isn't me? You'll recall the posts with the nyms from the movie
> "Hackers." When I asked Ken to prove his claim that I was the poster
> or admit he was wrong, you stated I offered a no win situation (not a
> verbatim quote, but the context is 100%).
> Will you slip and make it clear that you KNOW it's not me, just
> like you did then?
> You never did tell the readers who the person was that used the
> lame nyms. Since you made it clear you KNEW it wasn't me, it only
> makes sense that you knew who it was. Why not tell me, and anyone
> else reading, just who it was.
Why are you running off at the keyboard, Kent?
Kent Wills
>Bad sporgery Greegor47 using eternal september <x...@xxx.xxx> wrote
>> Why do you molest children, Grag?
>
>G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
>
>KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
>KBW > account with Eternal September.
>
>How could I possibly KNOW that?
Via the evidence, stupid.
>
>KBW > I've never had an account with Eternal September,
>KBW > and have no plans on getting one.
>
>Isn't that just another name for Motzarella?
You've made that claim. I've never confirmed it and you've never
offered anything to support it.
Of course, my Motz account expired over a year ago, a truth about
which I was and am very open, so it still couldn't be me.
>
>KBW > As such, you KNOW I didn't post that
>KBW > which your deeply rooted psychological
>KBW > NEED to lie forced you to claim I did.
>
>All I said was:
>G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
>How did you read so much into that?
The deceptive innuendo was and is clear.
Why not address the TRUTH found within my comment rather than
attempt to distract?
>
>> How long will we have to wait for you to PROVE you know it wasn't
>> and isn't me? �You'll recall the posts with the nyms from the movie
>> "Hackers." When I asked Ken to prove his claim that I was the poster
>> or admit he was wrong, you stated I offered a no win situation (not a
>> verbatim quote, but the context is 100%).
>> Will you slip and make it clear that you KNOW it's not me, just
>> like you did then?
>> You never did tell the readers who the person was that used the
>> lame nyms. �Since you made it clear you KNEW it wasn't me, it only
>> makes sense that you knew who it was. �Why not tell me, and anyone
>> else reading, just who it was.
>
>Why are you running off at the keyboard, Kent?
>
Avoidance noted.
Now that you've played the avoidance game in your pathetic
attempt to distract from the truth, why not actually address the TRUTH
I presented? Or is honesty really that difficult for you?
--a true story
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
Greegor
KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
KBW > account with Eternal September.
G > How could I possibly KNOW that?
KBW > Via the evidence, stupid.
Evidence that somehow shows that you
DON'T have an eternal-september account?
Proof of a negative?
Plus proof that I KNOW of your ""anti-proof""?
KBW > I've never had an account with Eternal September,
KBW > and have no plans on getting one.
You're a con artist.
G > Isn't that just another name for Motzarella?
KBW > You've made that claim.
KBW > I've never confirmed it
You're a con artist.
KBW > and you've never offered
KBW > anything to support it.
I asked. Don't you know?
KBW > Of course, my Motz account expired
KBW > over a year ago, a truth about which
KBW > I was and am very open,
You're a con artist.
Truth for you is just a setup for your next manipulative lie.
KBW > so it still couldn't be me.
And here it is! A logical fallacy tied to your ""truth".
KBW > As such, you KNOW I didn't post that
KBW > which your deeply rooted psychological
KBW > NEED to lie forced you to claim I did.
G > All I said was:
G > G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
G > How did you read so much into that?
KBW > The deceptive innuendo was and is clear.
Kent Wills accuses me of a deceptive innuendo?
That's precious!
KBW > Why not address the TRUTH found within
KBW > my comment rather than attempt to distract?
DS > How can you tell Wills is lying?
DS > His lips are moving and his hand is near a computer keyboard.
> >> How long will we have to wait for you to PROVE you know it wasn't
> >> and isn't me? You'll recall the posts with the nyms from the movie
> >> "Hackers." When I asked Ken to prove his claim that I was the poster
> >> or admit he was wrong, you stated I offered a no win situation (not a
> >> verbatim quote, but the context is 100%).
> >> Will you slip and make it clear that you KNOW it's not me, just
> >> like you did then?
> >> You never did tell the readers who the person was that used the
> >> lame nyms. Since you made it clear you KNEW it wasn't me, it only
> >> makes sense that you knew who it was. Why not tell me, and anyone
> >> else reading, just who it was.
G > Why are you running off at the keyboard, Kent?
KBW > Avoidance noted.
KBW > Now that you've played the avoidance
KBW > game in your pathetic attempt to
KBW > distract from the truth, why not actually
KBW > address the TRUTH I presented?
You lie profusely.
KBW > Or is honesty really that difficult for you?
You burgled the Weiben's garage with a teen ager.
Kent Wills
>G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
>
>KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
>KBW > account with Eternal September.
>
>G > How could I possibly KNOW that?
>
>KBW > Via the evidence, stupid.
>
>Evidence that somehow shows that you
>DON'T have an eternal-september account?
>Proof of a negative?
>Plus proof that I KNOW of your ""anti-proof""?
I was able to prove it by exposing your INABILITY to prove your
claim that I have such an account. You ran from it, as you often do
when your LIES are proved to be the lies they are.
Now prove, by your standards, that another of your deceptions has
been exposed, by either hiding from this truth or by trying to
distract.
Doesn't it just suck that I use your standards against you?
>
>
>KBW > I've never had an account with Eternal September,
>KBW >�and have no plans on getting one.
>
>You're a con artist.
If your lie were true, you would have been able to prove at least
one con from me.
By way of contrast, I've exposed so many of yours I lost count.
>
>G > Isn't that just another name for Motzarella?
>
>KBW > You've made that claim.
>KBW >�I've never confirmed it
>
>You're a con artist.
See above.
>
>KBW > and you've never offered
>KBW > anything to support it.
>
>I asked. Don't you know?
I stated that I've never confirmed it. To the erudite reader,
this indicates I don't know.
>
>KBW > Of course, my Motz account expired
>KBW > over a year ago, a truth about which
>KBW > I was and am very open,
>
>You're a con artist.
>Truth for you is just a setup for your next manipulative lie.
Yet you've NEVER exposed a single lie from me. If I were a liar,
as you dishonestly claim, you would have exposed at least one. In
order to even try, you must LIE about what I've written.
>
>KBW > so it still couldn't be me.
>
>And here it is! A logical fallacy tied to your ""truth".
Since I don't have an account with Motz, it expired long ago, or
ES, the post could not be mine. Outside of your delusions, this truth
can't be a fallacy.
>
>KBW > As such, you KNOW I didn't post that
>KBW > which your deeply rooted psychological
>KBW > NEED to lie forced you to claim I did.
>
>G > All I said was:
>G > G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
>G > How did you read so much into that?
>
>KBW > The deceptive innuendo was and is clear.
>
>Kent Wills accuses me of a deceptive innuendo?
>That's precious!
I not only accuse, but have proved this truth MANY times. Your
claiming, via deceptive innuendo, that I wrote the troll post has been
proved the lie it was and is by pointing out how you've tried to
distract from your claim, via innuendo, that I wrote it.
I realize you think I post the bulk of the articles found on
Usenet, but the truth is, anyone can offer a troll post. Just as the
person who authored the post that started this did.
I am not alone in my dislike of you. Further, anyone with a
desire and access can post a passing troll article.
That you are so stone cold stupid that you where snagged only
shows that you are stone cold stupid. Not that this was in question,
of course.
>
>KBW > Why not address the TRUTH found within
>KBW > my comment rather than attempt to distract?
>
>DS > How can you tell Wills is lying?
>DS > His lips are moving and his hand is near a computer keyboard.
I see you still can't be honest. Nowhere in the post to which you
replied do the two lines above appear.
Care to explain the EXACT reason you are so UNABLE to be honest,
Greg? I've asked this of you MANY times, but so far you have never
given an answer.
BTW, I've never seen a post from Dan making the claim you
attribute to him.
Please post the MID and/or Google link to just one post from Dan
where he presented that which you claim above that he did. If you
would rather admit another of your MANY lies has been exposed, that is
acceptable to me.
The choice is yours. Prove the claim you present, a win for you,
or admit you've offered more proof that you are psychologically UNABLE
to be honest unless you make a mistake or are forced.
>
>> >> How long will we have to wait for you to PROVE you know it wasn't
>> >> and isn't me? �You'll recall the posts with the nyms from the movie
>> >> "Hackers." When I asked Ken to prove his claim that I was the poster
>> >> or admit he was wrong, you stated I offered a no win situation (not a
>> >> verbatim quote, but the context is 100%).
>> >> Will you slip and make it clear that you KNOW it's not me, just
>> >> like you did then?
>> >> You never did tell the readers who the person was that used the
>> >> lame nyms. �Since you made it clear you KNEW it wasn't me, it only
>> >> makes sense that you knew who it was. �Why not tell me, and anyone
>> >> else reading, just who it was.
>
>G > Why are you running off at the keyboard, Kent?
>
>KBW > Avoidance noted.
>KBW > Now that you've played the avoidance
>KBW > game in your pathetic attempt to
>KBW > distract from the truth, why not actually
>KBW > address the TRUTH I presented?
>
>You lie profusely.
Continued avoidance noted.
I'd be amazed if your deception is fooling anyone.
>
>KBW > Or is honesty really that difficult for you?
>
>You burgled the Weiben's garage with a kid.
Your admission, by your own standards, that honesty really is
that difficulty for you is accepted.
Kent Wills
Since you felt the need to post the exact same message again, I'll
expose your lies again.
>G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
>
>KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
>KBW > account with Eternal September.
>
>G > How could I possibly KNOW that?
>
>KBW > Via the evidence, stupid.
>
>Evidence that somehow shows that you
>DON'T have an eternal-september account?
>Proof of a negative?
If you prefer, the LACK of evidence provided by you that I DO
have such an account.
You made the claim, so it befalls you to prove it, a win for you,
or admit another of your MANY lies has been exposed.
>Plus proof that I KNOW of your ""anti-proof""?
Double quotes are not scare quotes and still mean nothing at all
Greg.
Your complete INABILITY to understand simple grammatical rules
aside, that you've never offered anything to support your positive
assertion, via deceptive innuendo, that I wrote the troll post is
telling. It's not proof that you knew I didn't write it, but it does
give cause to suspect.
>
>KBW > I've never had an account with Eternal September,
>KBW > and have no plans on getting one.
>
>You're a con artist.
You are projecting. Still.
You've been projecting onto others your own vile nature and
conning people on Usenet for about a decade now, isn't that true,
Greg?
>
>G > Isn't that just another name for Motzarella?
>
>KBW > You've made that claim.
>KBW > I've never confirmed it
>
>You're a con artist.
You've never offered a single shred of evidence of any such con
artistry.
The problem you've run into repeated is you lack of skill with
and proper use of the English language and it's peculiar grammar that
assigns tense, voice, and verb agreement. You are a stupid little boy
and that's all you'll ever be.
>
>KBW > and you've never offered
>KBW > anything to support it.
>
>I asked. Don't you know?
Rhetorical statements disguised as questions aren't asking, Greg.
I openly admit I've never checked. As such, I can't know. That
you make the claim is grounds to presume it's a lie. I don't care
enough to check, since I don't rarely care from what server a post is
sent.
>
>KBW > Of course, my Motz account expired
>KBW > over a year ago, a truth about which
>KBW > I was and am very open,
>
>You're a con artist.
>Truth for you is just a setup for your next manipulative lie.
You really need to cease the projection, Greg. I can't imagine
anyone is falling for it.
>
>KBW > so it still couldn't be me.
>
>And here it is! A logical fallacy tied to your ""truth".
Tied to the truth that you provided NOTHING in the way of
evidence of your positive claim, via deceptive innuendo, that the
poster was no one else but me?
>
>KBW > As such, you KNOW I didn't post that
>KBW > which your deeply rooted psychological
>KBW > NEED to lie forced you to claim I did.
>
>G > All I said was:
>G > G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
>G > How did you read so much into that?
>
>KBW > The deceptive innuendo was and is clear.
>
>Kent Wills accuses me of a deceptive innuendo?
>That's precious!
Considering you offered nothing in the way of evidence, but you
were insinuating that I authored the troll post, yes, that is a
deceptive innuendo on your part. There is no way around this truth.
Just like your lies about Nazi uniforms and riding ponies.
You lie and then you infer based on the lies you present. Even
after said lies are exposed.
>
>KBW > Why not address the TRUTH found within
>KBW > my comment rather than attempt to distract?
>
>DS > How can you tell Wills is lying?
>DS > His lips are moving and his hand is near a computer keyboard.
When did Dan Sullivan ever post such a claim?
Unless you are lying, still, you'll post the MID and/or Google
link to just one post from Dan where such a claim is made.
Will you prove your claim that Dan authored that which you
attribute to him, or will you admit another of your MANY lies has been
exposed.
>
>> >> How long will we have to wait for you to PROVE you know it wasn't
>> >> and isn't me? You'll recall the posts with the nyms from the movie
>> >> "Hackers." When I asked Ken to prove his claim that I was the poster
>> >> or admit he was wrong, you stated I offered a no win situation (not a
>> >> verbatim quote, but the context is 100%).
>> >> Will you slip and make it clear that you KNOW it's not me, just
>> >> like you did then?
>> >> You never did tell the readers who the person was that used the
>> >> lame nyms. Since you made it clear you KNEW it wasn't me, it only
>> >> makes sense that you knew who it was. Why not tell me, and anyone
>> >> else reading, just who it was.
>
>G > Why are you running off at the keyboard, Kent?
>
>KBW > Avoidance noted.
>KBW > Now that you've played the avoidance
>KBW > game in your pathetic attempt to
>KBW > distract from the truth, why not actually
>KBW > address the TRUTH I presented?
>
>You lie profusely.
You asked a question. It followed a statement regarding your lack
of evidence of a positive identity claim you made via deceptive
innuendo. Failure to respond, and diverging with a pointless question
is proof YOU lie profusely to cover up your compulsive lying.
>
>KBW > Or is honesty really that difficult for you?
>
>You burgled the Weiben's garage with a teen ager.
You were asked a simple question. Instead of answering it you
make a claim you not only are unable to prove but have admitted isn't
about me.
Care to explain this tactic of yours? Or do you really think
everyone reading is as STUPID as you consistently PROVE yourself to
be?
Greegor
> Bad Sporgery Greegor47 using eternal september <x...@xxx.xxx> wrote
> BSG > Why do you molest children, Grag?
>
> That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
>
>
> http://www.iowabar.org/IowaSupremeCourt.nsf/9a275c73f72409f4862564bb0...
>
> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Did you ever even say you're sorry to the Weibens?
Kent Wills
What do you think you did to them, Greg? You replied to your own
post, so you must think you did something to them. Or have I once
again PROVED that you are so screwed up mentally that you don't know
what you're doing from one moment to the next?
Greegor
KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
KBW > account with Eternal September.
G > How could I possibly KNOW that?
KBW > Via the evidence, stupid.
G > Evidence that somehow shows that you
G > DON'T have an eternal-september account?
G > Proof of a negative?
KBW > If you prefer, the LACK of evidence
KBW > provided by you that I DO
KBW > have such an account.
Now you switched from a claim of evidence
to a claim of a lack of evidence?
Why did you switch?
Kent Wills
I didn't. I suggested you might prefer the LACK of evidence from
you to support your claim, made via deceptive innuendo, that I wrote
the troll post.
This isn't the same as what you dishonestly present.
Why don't you address the TRUTH I presented in my post, rather
than attempt to distract from it?
I do appreciate that, by YOUR standards, you made the tacit
admission the rest of the points I raised were and are 100% true.
Greegor
KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
KBW > account with Eternal September.
G > How could I possibly KNOW that?
KBW > Via the evidence, stupid.
G > Evidence that somehow shows that you
G > DON'T have an eternal-september account?
G > Proof of a negative?
KBW > If you prefer, the LACK of evidence
KBW > provided by you that I DO
KBW > have such an account.
Now you switched from a claim of evidence
to a claim of a lack of evidence?
Why did you switch?
KBW > I didn't. I suggested you might prefer the
KBW > LACK of evidence from you to support
KBW > your claim,
This one?
============================
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/e2152c0150972ae4
KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
KBW > account with Eternal September.
===========================
Running off at the keyboard again, Kent!
KBW > made via deceptive innuendo,
KBW > that I wrote the troll post.
KBW > This isn't the same as what you
KBW > dishonestly present. Why don't you
KBW > address the TRUTH I presented in my
KBW > post, rather than attempt to distract
KBW > from it? I do appreciate that, by
KBW > YOUR standards, you made the
KBW > tacit admission the rest of the points
KBW > I raised were and are 100% true.
Kent Wills
>G > That's just SO AMAZING, Kent.
>
>KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
>KBW > account with Eternal September.
>
>G > How could I possibly KNOW that?
>
>KBW > Via the evidence, stupid.
>
>G > Evidence that somehow shows that you
>G > DON'T have an eternal-september account?
>G > Proof of a negative?
>
>KBW > If you prefer, the LACK of evidence
>KBW > provided by you that I DO
>KBW > have such an account.
>
>Now you switched from a claim of evidence
>to a claim of a lack of evidence?
>
>Why did you switch?
Asked and answered.
Again you PROVE you can't be honest.
Here's a free hint: If you're going to dishonestly present that
a question hasn't already been answered, don't include the answer that
was given in your post. When you do that, you allow anyone and
everyone reading to spot your psychological INABILITY to be honest,
unless you make a mistake or are forced.
>
>KBW > I didn't. I suggested you might prefer the
>KBW > LACK of evidence from you to support
>KBW > your claim,
>
>This one?
No. Please explain just why you NEED to dishonestly present that
it could be. What is the SPECIFIC cause of this latest act of
dishonesty on your part? Serious question.
>============================
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/e2152c0150972ae4
>
>KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
>KBW > account with Eternal September.
>===========================
>
>
>Running off at the keyboard again, Kent!
You may call the truth I present by any phrase you wish.
Greegor
KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
KBW > account with Eternal September.
G > How could I possibly KNOW that?
KBW > Via the evidence, stupid.
G > Evidence that somehow shows that you
G > DON'T have an eternal-september account?
G > Proof of a negative?
KBW > If you prefer, the LACK of evidence
KBW > provided by you that I DO
KBW > have such an account.
G > Now you switched from a claim of evidence
G > to a claim of a lack of evidence?
G > Why did you switch?
KBW > Asked and answered.
KBW > Again you PROVE you can't be honest.
KBW > Here's a free hint: If you're going to dishonestly
KBW > present that a question hasn't already been
KBW > answered, don't include the answer that was
KBW > given in your post. When you do that, you
KBW > allow anyone and everyone reading to spot
KBW > your psychological INABILITY to be honest,
KBW > unless you make a mistake or are forced.
Nice try!
KBW > I didn't. I suggested you might prefer the
KBW > LACK of evidence from you to support
KBW > your claim,
G > This one?
KBW > No. Please explain just why you NEED to
KBW > dishonestly present that it could be. What
KBW > is the SPECIFIC cause of this latest act of
KBW > dishonesty on your part? Serious question.
The loaded question gag is closely related to the
excluded middle or false dilemma fallacy.
eg. "Have you stopped beating your dog?"
============================
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/e2152c0150972ae4
KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
KBW > account with Eternal September.
===========================
G > Running off at the keyboard again, Kent!
KBW > You may call the truth I present by any phrase you wish.
It's funny when you ""speechify"" Kent.
It reveals some insecurity.
KBW > made via deceptive innuendo,
KBW > that I wrote the troll post.
KBW > This isn't the same as what you
KBW > dishonestly present. Why don't you
KBW > address the TRUTH I presented in my
KBW > post, rather than attempt to distract
KBW > from it? I do appreciate that, by
KBW > YOUR standards, you made the
KBW > tacit admission the rest of the points
KBW > I raised were and are 100% true.
Kent Wills AKA Kent Bradley Wills AKA Compuelf AKA (various) DOB Jan 8
1969 Two Felony Garage Burglar used teen as accomplice
http://www.myspace.com/29801731
http://www.myspace.com/KBWILLS
http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/
Kent's stock deceptions/logical fallacies
F. Ad Hominem calling opponents
1. Drunks or drunk drivers
2. Druggies or on drugs
3. Mentally Ill often as result of drug use
G. Res Judicata
1. Already conceded to Kent's argument
2. Question already asked and answered.
H. Fallacy of Suppressed Evidence
1a. Missing Middle, False Dilemma, False Dichotomy, bifurcation
1b. Fallacy of Complex Question - loaded question with presupposition
2. Withholding proof saying it's already on the table
3. ""Check is in the mail"" as proof of something.
4. Proof held hostage awaiting opponents proof on something else
J. Lie claimed to be based on opponents standards - a type of strawman
Claim that a lack of proof disproves something.
Claim that a lack of proof proves something.
It's as if Kent is an automation that is WAY too simple.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/loadques.html
Since a question is not an argument, simply asking a loaded question
is not a fallacious argument. Rather, loaded questions are typically
used to trick someone into implying something they did not intend. For
instance, salespeople learn to ask such loaded questions as: "Will
that be cash or charge?" This question gives only two alternatives,
thus presuming that the potential buyer has already decided to make a
purchase, which is similar to the Black-or-White Fallacy. If the
potential buyer answers the question directly, he may suddenly find
himself an actual buyer.
Kent's Criminal Appeal for Garage Burglary
IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d 20,22 (Iowa 2005)
cited BY 06-1812 State v. CARROLL (Iowa 2007)
cited BY 08-0460 State v. Berry (Iowa 2009)
Kent's Appeal
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
PDF
HTML
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Notice that KENT made claims re sale of 202 NW College apartment
building
That's geoparcel gp=802415452029
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
( Step by step instructions elsewhere with name Kent B Wills )
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
http://www.rogersgis.com/zoom/Residential_Development/indexfull.htm
http://www.arcountydata.com/county.asp?county=Benton
Some of Kent Wills' known usenet newsgroup identities:
compuelf at yahoo.com
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=5zmbTBIAAADOJ684KS60nUaU_zmlHzoM8rhlH0Pnl47z4AZhN98BFg
compuelf at gmail.com
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tO2J8xIAAAD-FV_7I-6E0McpeoqRe5_P8rhlH0Pnl47z4AZhN98BFg
Iowa Department of Corrections records for Kent
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Name Kent Bradley Wills [ As Collected Sept 13, 2009 ]
Offender Number 1155768
Sex M
Birth Date 01/08/1969
Age 40
Location
Offense
County Of Commitment
Commitment Date
Duration
TDD/SDD *
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date
* SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 12/16/2008
Probation C Felony Polk 12/16/2008
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003
IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d 20,22 (Iowa 2005)
cited BY 06-1812 State v. CARROLL (Iowa 2007)
cited BY 08-0460 State v. Berry (Iowa 2009)
SUMMARY
A Home’s Attached Garage Can Be an Occupied Structure
State v. Wills, _____ N.W.2d _____ (Iowa 2005)(No. 31/04-0202)
Kent Bradley Wills argued that his trial attorney was ineffective
because of a failure to move for acquittal and to object to a jury
instruction. Wills argued an attached garage of a residence is a
separate occupied structure from the living quarters of the residence,
and the state failed to prove an element of a burglary charge against
him.
The Supreme Court, Wiggins, J., rejects Wills’ argument. The Court
notes the garage at the home involved in the incident was separated
from the living quarters by a door. The garage is a functional part of
the residence. The garage and living quarters are a single structure.
Under Iowa law (section 702.12, Iowa Code) the residence including the
garage is a single “occupied structure”. The Court writes, “Wills’
claim is without merit. . . . [T]he residence is the one and only
‘occupied structure’ under the facts of this case. Had Wills’ trial
counsel made this objection . . . , it would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills’ trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or object to the instruction because there
was no legal basis for the motion or objection.” The district court
decision denying Wills’ ineffective counsel motion is affirmed.
1. State v. Wills, No. 31 / 04-0202 , SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, May 6,
2005, Filed
OVERVIEW: Defendant's conviction for burglary under Iowa Code §
713.5(2) (2003) was affirmed as where defendant entered a garage that
was only separated from the living quarters by a door, the living
quarters including the garage were a single "occupied structure" under
Iowa Code § 702.12.
Kent's Appeal
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
HTML
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk
County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective
assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.
Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender,
and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State
Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin
Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P.
Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch,
Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
WIGGINS, Justice.
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for
second-degree burglary contending that
an attached garage is a separate occupied
structure from that of the living quarters
of the residence. In this appeal, we must
determine whether trial counsel was
ineffective for (1) failing to move for
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to convict Wills
of second-degree burglary when he entered
an attached garage of a residence when no
persons were present in the garage, but
when persons were present in the living
quarters; and (2) failing to object to a
jury instruction based on this same
argument. Because we find there was no
legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury
instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not
ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called
the local police to report that a car
alarm sounded in the resident's
neighborhood. The city dispatched a police
officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only
to be stopped a couple of blocks later
by a person who informed the officer he
had witnessed someone running from the
area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the
car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the
person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody
running from the area. The minor answered
that he had not. While the officer and
another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood
arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people,
one of whom was heavy set with a blinking
light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She
observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's
attached garage through an unlocked service
door. She further observed a smaller
individual standing by a van parked in
the neighbor's driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave
even though they found a large amount of
coins, a flashlight, and an electronic
pocket organizer in his pockets. After
releasing the minor, the police officers
drove to the residence where the neighbor
observed the two suspicious people and
woke the owner. The owner, his wife,
and two daughters were in the residence
sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered
change and an electronic pocket organizer
were missing from the vehicles. The
owner's daughter reported a diamond ring
and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the
officers the minor was with Wills. After
the officers questioned the minor again,
he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the
burglary, the officers arrested him.
The State filed a trial information
charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the
information to include two additional
charges of burglary in the third degree
and using a juvenile to commit an
indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills
guilty of the crimes of burglary in the
second degree, burglary in the third
degree, and using a juvenile to commit
an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary
claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel.
II. Scope of Review.
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the
United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S.
Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93
(1984). Our review for a claim involving
violations of the Constitution is de novo.
State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
for postconviction relief actions. State
v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999).
However, we will address such claims on
direct appeal when the record is sufficient
to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer,
609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The
appellate record in the present case is
sufficient to allow us to address Wills'
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
on direct appeal.
In order for a defendant to succeed on a
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,
the defendant must prove: (1) counsel
failed to perform an essential duty and
(2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice
results when "there is a reasonable
probability that, but for the counsel's
unprofessional errors, the result of the
proceeding would have been different."
State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466
U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments
also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for
correction of errors at law. State v.
Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).
III. Analysis.
To find Wills guilty of burglary in the
second degree, the State had to prove
Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or
upon an occupied structure in which one
or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa
Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).
In this appeal, Wills first contends his
trial counsel was ineffective for failing
to move for a judgment of acquittal on
the basis there was insufficient evidence
to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons
present in or upon the occupied structure.
Wills concedes the garage was an occupied
structure, but argues the living quarters
and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore,
the jury could not have found there were
people present in the attached garage
at the time of the burglary.
The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:
[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances
to buildings and structures, land, water
or air vehicle, or similar place adapted
for overnight accommodation of persons,
or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity
therein, or for the storage or safekeeping
of anything of value. Such a structure
is an "occupied structure" whether or not
a person is actually present.
Id. § 702.12.
Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590
N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the
garage and the living quarters are separate
and independent occupied structures. In
Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors
were operated in the same structure.
590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant
committed two burglaries by entering each
business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up
demonstrate that the portions are
independent working units which constitute
'[a] combination of materials to form a
construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id.
Smothers is not at odds with the present
case because the living quarters and the
garage are not separate or independent
units of the residence.
Our review of the record reveals the garage
in question was a three-car attached garage
separated from the living quarters by a
door. The same roof covered the garage as
the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides.
It was structurally no different from any
other room in the residence.
The garage was a functional part of the
residence. On the night of the incident,
the door was unlocked. The owner of the
residence used two stalls in the garage to
park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As
such, the garage and the living quarters
are a single "structure" or "building"
functioning as an integral part of the
family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single
"occupied structure" under section 702.12.
See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr.
2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's
entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage
was attached to the house; therefore,
burglary of the garage was burglary of
an inhabited dwelling house); People v.
Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an
attached garage is a 'dwelling' because
it is part of the structure in which
the owner or occupant lives");
State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53
(N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary
of the [attached] garage was burglary of
the dwelling house because the garage was
a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d
760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding
"[s]ince the garage in the present case
was structurally part of a building
which was used for overnight lodging of
various persons, it must be considered
as part of a dwelling"); White v. State,
630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982)
(holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered
a habitation within the purview of the
penal code because the garage is a
structure appurtenant to and connected
to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.
2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993)
(holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute
included an attached garage).
Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to support
a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage there were no persons
present in or upon the occupied
structure, it would have been overruled
by the court because the owner and his
family were present in the residence at
the time of the burglary.
Wills also claims his counsel was
ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district
court on the same ground; that the
living quarters were a separate and
independent occupied structure from the
attached garage. The instruction as
given stated:
The State must prove all of the following
elements of Burglary in the Second
Degree as to Count I:
1. On or about the 12th day of August,
2003, the defendant or someone he aided
and abetted broke into or entered the
residence at . . . .
2. The residence at . . . was an occupied
structure as defined in Instruction No. 29.
3. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did not have permission or
authority to break into the residence at ...
4. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did so with the specific
intent to commit a theft therein.
5. During the incident persons were present
in or upon the occupied structure.
If the State has proved all of the elements,
the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not
guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and
you will then consider the charge of
Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree
explained in Instruction No. 21.
(Emphasis added.)
Wills' claim is without merit. As we have
discussed, the residence is the one and
only "occupied structure" under the facts
of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel
made this objection to the instruction,
it would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not
ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting
to the instruction because there was no
legal basis for the motion or objection.
See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234,
238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an
issue that has no merit).
IV. Disposition.
We affirm the judgment of the district
court because Wills' trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise
meritless issues.
AFFIRMED.
---------------------------------
Pay close attention to past owners of 202 NW College Ave.
Kent made affirmative claims about the property online.
Kent's folks sold it in 1994 while Kent lived there!
On 03/30/1999 Sweeney's filed on Kent for UNPAID RENT!
GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000
[ As Collected Sept 13, 2009 ]
Seller: WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R.
Buyer: THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST
04/26/1994 135,000 D/Deed 7010/188
-
Seller: SHELDAHL, ERIC A.
Buyer: WILLS, FRED
01/02/1990 130,500 D/Deed 6189/972
A Larger photo:
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Notice that name SWEENEY above?
Check this out!
Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on the SWEENEY case, 4th one down.
Under the "Filings" tab:
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT BRANDT GREGORY D 08/25/1999 09/01/1999 09/01/1999
Comments: $156.25 7.244% FROM 03/30/99
COMPUTER GENERATED NOTICE 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999
Comments: Notice of Proof of Claim
RETURN OF ORIGINAL NOTICE 04/21/1999 04/23/1999 04/23/1999
Comments: 4/10/99 KENT PERS
37.60
VERIFICATION OF ACCT HAS BEEN FILED 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE SWEENEY RENTALS 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
Comments: UNPAID RENT
Under the "Financial" Tab:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 98.60 31.00 67.60
FINE 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 238.46 0.00 238.46
-----------
$337.06 $31.00 $306.06
SUPPORT/ALIMONY N/A 0.00 N/A
----------------------------------------
Kent's 2000 Felony, first of TWO in Iowa
WILLS, KENT BRADLEY 05771 FECR145250 (POLK)
01/24/2000 Offense Date THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD) WITHDRAWN
01/24/2000 Offense Date THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
03/07/2000 DEFERRED JUDGMENT (At that time) Sentence: 365 Day(s)
03/07/2000 PROBATION INFORMAL; 8/07/01-TRNFRD TO FORMAL 365 Day(s)
03/07/2000 COMMUNITY SERVICE 50 Hour(s)
03/07/2000 REFERRED TO OTHER AGENCY 1ST TIME OFFENDER CLASS
08/07/2001 JAIL PROB HRG 11 Day(s)
08/07/2001 JAIL PROB HRG 11 Day(s) TIME SERVED
08/07/2001 PROBATION EXTENDED PROB HRG
04/16/2002 PROBATION EXTENDED TO 08/06/03
04/16/2002 IMPOSED 7 Day(s)
04/16/2002 OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS PROB HRG 6 Day(s)
04/16/2002 DETENTION PROB HRG 6 Day(s)
08/07/2003 PRIOR ORDERS CONTINUED PROB EXTENDED UNTIL 8-06-04
11/26/2003 REVOKED PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
11/26/2003 PLACEMENT HRG PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL120 Day(s)
11/26/2003 SUSPEND PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; TIME SERVED 106 Day(s)
11/26/2003 COMMUNITY CORR PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL 14 Day(s)
( When Kent's second Felony revoked the rest of his Probation.)
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on case FECR145250, 2nd one down.
Under the "[Criminal Charges/Disposition]" tab:
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT B WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR145250 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Defendant: WILLS, KENT BRADLEY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 01 Charge
Charge:
714.2(2) Description: THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD)
Offense Date: 01/24/2000 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0386367-01
Adjudication
Charge:
714.2(2) Description: THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD)
Adj.:
DNU-WITHDRAWN Adj.Date: 03/07/2000
Adj.Judge:
WILSON, ROBERT D
Comments: AMENDED TI FILED
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(2) Description: THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: WITHDRAWN
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 02 Charge
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Offense Date: 01/24/2000 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0386367-02
Adjudication
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Adj.:
DEFERRED Adj.Date: 03/07/2000
Adj.Judge:
WILSON, ROBERT D
Comments:
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: DEFERRED JUDGMENT
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 365 Day(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 365 Day(s)
Comment:
INFORMAL;8/07/01-TRNFRD TO FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 50 Hour(s)
Comment:
TO BE DETERMINED BY PROBATION
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: REFERRED TO OTHER AGENCY
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
1ST TIME OFFENDER CLASS
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2001 Sentence: JAIL
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: JACOBS, LOUISE M
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 11 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2001 Sentence: TIME SERVED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: JACOBS, LOUISE M
Facility Type:
J Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 11 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2001 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: JACOBS, LOUISE M
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROB HRG-4/16/02-PROBATION EXTENDED TO 08/06/03
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
04/16/2002 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: COPPOLA, CAROL L
Facility Type:
J Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 7 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
04/16/2002 Sentence: OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: COPPOLA, CAROL L
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 6 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
04/16/2002 Sentence: DETENTION
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: COPPOLA, CAROL L
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 6 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2003 Sentence: PRIOR ORDERS CONTINUED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: MCGHEE, ODELL
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROB EXTENDED UNTIL 8-06-04
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: REVOKED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: PLACEMENT
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 120 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: SUSPEND
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
J Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 106 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; TIME SERVED
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
J Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 14 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
---------------------------------------
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Count 01
08/12/2003 Offense Date BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
12/17/2003 Adj.Date: GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence 10 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Count 02
08/12/2003 Offense BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR VEHICLE
(AGMS)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 2 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION Duration: 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE Duration: 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
Count 03
08/12/2003 USING JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE(FELC)709A.
6(2)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Count 01 Charge
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Offense Date: 08/12/2003 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0668408-01
Adjudication
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Adj.:
DNU-GUILTY Adj.Date: 12/17/2003
Adj.Judge:
HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Comments: GUILTY
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 150 Hour(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
12/17/2003 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 02 Charge
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Offense Date: 08/12/2003 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0668408-02
Adjudication
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Adj.:
DNU-GUILTY Adj.Date: 12/17/2003
Adj.Judge:
HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Comments: GUILTY
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 150 Hour(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
12/17/2003 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 03 Charge
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Offense Date: 08/12/2003 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0668408-03
Adjudication
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Adj.:
DNU-GUILTY Adj.Date: 12/17/2003
Adj.Judge:
HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Comments: GUILTY
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 150 Hour(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
12/17/2003 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
-------------------------------------
Filings
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
ORDER OF DISCHARGE OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: FROM PROBATION
OTHER EVENT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
12/16/2008
Comments: FIELD DISCHARGE REPORT
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: REVOCATION HEARING SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED
DEFENDANT HAS NOT PAID IN FULL FINANCIAL
OBLIGATIONS
ORDER FOR PROBATION REVOCATION HEARING MOISAN CYNTHIA M 12/05/2008
12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: ON 1/7/09 AT 9:30AM RM204
PROBATION REVOCATION 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: REPORT OF VIOLATIONS FILED BY JAN HORNOCKER
FORMAL PROBATION HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/25/2006 01/26/2006
01/26/2006
Comments: EXTENDED TO 01/16/09 OR UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE MET
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006
OTHER ORDER HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/11/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006
Comments: DEFT'S PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09; DEFT TO
COMPLETE
CONDITIONS LISTED
OTHER EVENT 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005
Comments: THE SUPREME COURT RETURNED FILE, PSI, 4 TRANSCRIPTS,
AND 1 ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS
OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 06/09/2005 06/13/2005
06/13/2005
Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS
15.9 HOURS = $795.00
ATTORNEY - GRETA TRUMAN
OTHER EVENT CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005
09/15/2005
Comments: BILL OF COSTS
$27.50 TAXED AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND PAYABLE
TO
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
#04-0202
OTHER ORDER SUPREME COURT OF IOWA 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005
Comments: RE DEFT'S APPEAL CLAIMING INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL:
JUDGEMENT AFFIRMED
#04-0202
PROCEDENDO CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005
Comments: AFFIRMED
PROCEED W/DILIGENCE AS IF THERE HAD BEEN NO
APPEAL
#04-0202
COMMUNITY SERVICE 05/25/2004 05/27/2004 05/27/2004
Comments: 135 HRS COMPLETED 5/24/04
INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 05/11/2004 05/13/2004
05/13/2004
Comments: $1150
ELECTRONIC FILING
OTHER EVENT 04/26/2004 04/28/2004 04/28/2004
Comments: SUPREME COURT REC'D 1 FILE, 1 PSI ENVELOPE,
1 EXHIBIT(1 ENVELOPE DATED 1/21/04)
REC'D 4/20/04
OTHER ORDER NICKERSON DON 04/23/2004 04/27/2004 04/27/2004
Comments: THE BALANCE OF ATTNY FEE AND CC SHALL BE
CONVERTED TO 135 HRS COMM SERVICE
TO BE COMPLETED FROM FT DSM FACILITY
OR TRANSFER TO INTERSTATE COMPACT
COMMUNITY SERVICE 04/22/2004 04/23/2004 04/23/2004
Comments: 150 HRS COMPLETED
APRIL 8, 2004
OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004
Comments: RECD CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR DEFT
OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004
Comments: FILE AND PSI SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
ONE ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS FILED 1/21/04
SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
OTHER EVENT 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 04/19/2004
Comments: SUP CRT RECEIVED 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS
FILED 4/1/04 (VOL I & II)
SUP CRT 04-202
OTHER EVENT 04/06/2004 05/18/2004 05/18/2004
Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 4/1/04 SENT TO THE
SUPREME COURT
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004
04/05/2004
Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/16/03
VOLUME II
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004
04/05/2004
Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/15/03
VOLUME I
OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004
Comments: EXHIBITS RETURNED
OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004
Comments: ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS CHECKED OUT TO COURT
REPORTER R.M.
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004
Comments: MOTION IS GRANTED REGARDING REVIEW OF
PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTY FEES AND
THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS ORDERED TO MAKE
PAYMENT AS REQUESTED.
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/30/2004 03/31/2004
ENTERED IN ERROR
Comments: STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER SHALL MAKE PAYMENT AS
REQUESTED.
MOTION 03/18/2004 03/19/2004 03/19/2004
Comments: TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DOCKETING FILED BY
ASSISTANT APPELLATE DEFENDER
ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004
Comments: ON MOTION TO REVIEW ACTION RE:PAYMENT OF
COURT APPOINTED ATTY.
3/29/04 8:15AM RM209A
MOTION 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004
Comments: FOR REVIEW OF ACTION REGARDING PAYMENT
OF COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY FEES
FILED BY ATDF
OTHER EVENT 03/11/2004 03/11/2004 03/11/2004
Comments: SUPREME COURT RECVD 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF SENTENCING
ON 1/16/04 AND STATUS CONF ON 12/12/03 FILED
3/1/04
04-202
OTHER EVENT 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 03/09/2004
Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 3/1/04 SENT TO THE
SUPREME COURT
INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 03/09/2004 03/18/2004
03/18/2004
Comments: $1350.00 ELECTRONIC FILING
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004
03/03/2004 03/03/2004
Comments: OF STATUS CONFERENCE ON 12/12/2003
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004
03/03/2004 03/03/2004
Comments: OF SENTENCING ON 01/16/2004
OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 02/26/2004 02/27/2004
02/27/2004
Comments: COMBINED CERTIFICATE
OTHER EVENT 02/24/2004 02/24/2004 02/24/2004
Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES RECEIVED BY SUPREME COURT
2-10-04; SUPREME COURT NUMBER 04-202
ORDER APPOINTING OVROM ELIZA 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004
Comments: ORDER GRANTING K TAYLOR TO W/D
APPELLATE COUNSEL IS APPT
OTHER APPLICATION 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004
Comments: TO WITHDRAW
OTHER EVENT 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004
Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES AND CERTIFIED COPY OF NOTICE
OF APPEAL SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN A 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004
Comments: COURT APPOINTED BILLING
47 HOURS = $2500
OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004
ENTERED IN ERROR
Comments: COURT
NOTICE OF APPEAL TAYLOR KAREN A 02/06/2004 02/09/2004 02/09/2004
Comments: FILED BY ATDF
OTHER EVENT 01/23/2004 01/27/2004 01/27/2004
Comments: ADDENDUM TO PSI REPORT
EXHIBIT MAXEY REBECCA 01/21/2004 01/21/2004 01/21/2004
Comments: STATE'S EXHIBITS
1-$13.21; 2-$24.25 (IN VAULT); 3-LIGHT;
4&5-WRITTEN STATEMENT; 6,7,8-DIAGRAM
1 ENVELOPE & VAULT
OTHER EVENT 01/20/2004 01/26/2004 01/26/2004
Comments: VORP
VICTIM DOES NOT WANT TO VORP
NO RESTITUTION ISSUES AT THIS TIME
VICTIM DENNIS AND JAMIE WIEBEN
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 01/16/2004
01/20/2004 01/20/2004
Comments: $15.00
PRE SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT PSI 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
01/16/2004
ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
Comments: FOUND GUILTY BY JURY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL
PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS;
COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO
FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S
ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
01/16/2004
ENTERED IN ERROR
Comments: PLED GUILTY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL
PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS;
COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO
FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S
MITTIMUS TO STATE INSTITUTION WILLS KENT BRADLEY 01/16/2004
01/16/2004 01/16/2004
Comments: **FORT DES MOINES**
RETURN OF SERVICE - OTHER POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 12/23/2003
12/26/2003 12/26/2003
Comments: TRANSPORT COSTS $96.24
OTHER EVENT 12/22/2003 12/23/2003 12/23/2003
Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF ORDER TO EXCEED STATE FEE
LIMITATION RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE MAXEY REBECCA 12/17/2003 12/18/2003
12/18/2003
CRIMINAL VERDICT HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003
Comments: OF GUILTY TO BURGLARY 2ND, 3RD, AND USING A
JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE; DCS
WILL SUBMIT A PSI BY 1 WK PRIOR TO SENTENCING
DATE; PRESENTENCE CONF & SENTENCING 1-16-04
@ 8:30 AM IN RM 209A; BOND CONT
AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003
12/18/2003
Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH
JURY SELECTION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003
INSTRUCTIONS 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003
Comments: TO THE JURY AND STATEMENT OF THE CASE
OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003
Comments: JUV SEAN BILYEU SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE
CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF FOR THE DURATION
OF HIS REQUIRED TESTIMONY/PRESENCE IN THIS
MATTER. SEAN BILYEU SHALL REMAIN IN THE
CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF OR ANY OTHER
LOCATION (MEYER HALL) DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY
THE SHERIFF UNTIL THE POLK CO SHERIFF CAN
EXECUTE THE TIMELY TRANSPORT OF SEAN BILYEU
FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF TO THE ELDORA
TRAINING CENTER.
OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003
Comments: DEFT TO BE RETURNED FROM ELDORA-COTTAGE 5
BY JIM TROTTER, INVESTIGATOR/CTY ATTY'S
OFFICE; DEFT CAN BE PRESENT AT HIS TESTIMONY
ON 12-16-03
OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003
Comments: ATDF IS PERMITTED TO EXCEED GUIDELINE FOR
CT APPT ATTY IN THIS MATTER AND THAT THIS
ORDER SHALL INCLUED ALL FEES INCURRED AS OF
THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.
APPLICATION TO EXCEED FEES 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003
COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 12/12/2003
12/17/2003 12/17/2003
MOTION IN LIMINE TAYLOR KAREN 12/12/2003 12/15/2003 12/15/2003
ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 12/05/2003 12/08/2003 12/08/2003
Comments: STATUS CONF: 12/12/03 @ 10:00 AM RM 204
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/20/2003 12/09/2003 12/09/2003
Comments: 4=$0
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/18/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003
Comments: 3=$0
ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003
Comments: STATUS CONFERENCE
11/13/03 9AM RM 204
ALL PARTIES MUST BE PRESENT
ORDER SETTING TRIAL OVROM ELIZA 11/13/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003
Comments: 12/15/03 @ 9:00 AM RM 204
WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL TAYLOR KAREN 11/13/2003 11/14/2003
11/14/2003
Comments: LIMITED
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/10/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003
Comments: 1 = $0
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF DAVID DUVALL
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF BETH ANN SKOGEN
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF NEIL LEMKE
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF DENNIS WIEBEN
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF NATALIE BALUKOFF
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF SEAN BILYEU
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 10/31/2003 11/04/2003 11/04/2003
Comments: 6=$0
AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 10/31/2003 11/03/2003
11/03/2003
Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH
NOTICE WARD JAMES P 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003
Comments: OF ADDITIONAL WITNESSES
DNU - SUBPOENA PER DUCES TECUM 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003
Comments: 1 - $13.70
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE
AT STATE EXPENSE
OTHER APPLICATION 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE
AT STATE EXPENSE
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITION
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/07/2003 10/08/2003 10/08/2003
Comments: ORDER ENTERED 9/18/03 SETTING TRIAL FOR
11/19/03 WAS IS ERROR. TRIAL IS RESET FOR
11/12/03 @9:00 AM RM 204
OTHER EVENT 09/24/2003 09/26/2003 09/26/2003
Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF APP TO W/D
RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE OVROM ELIZA 09/18/2003 09/19/2003 09/19/2003
Comments: WAS HELD; TRIAL ON 11-19-03
ATDF TAYLOR
OTHER EVENT AMUNDSON LAURA K 08/26/2003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003
Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS
.4-$18.00
APPEARANCE TAYLOR KAREN 08/25/2003 08/26/2003 08/26/2003
Comments: FILED BY KAREN TAYLOR
WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL OVROM ELIZA 08/21/2003 08/22/2003 08/22/2003
Comments: OF ADULT PUBLIC DEF IS GRANTED
KAREN TAYLOR IS APPOINTED
ORDER OF ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003
Comments: Pretrial Conference 09/18/2003 01:30 PM DCC1
Trial 10/22/2003 09:00 AM DCC9
Bond is continued
TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003
Comments: FILED BY JAMES WARD
ORDER FOR ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003
08/14/2003
Comments: IN CUSTODY ON 8/21/03 AT 10:30AM JAILCOURT
OUT OF CUSTODY AT 8AM ROOM 204
PRELIM HAS NOT BEEN WAIVED SET FOR 8/22/03
DNU - HEARING FOR BOND REDUCTION MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003
08/14/2003
Comments: BOND $13000 C/S
APP FOR COUNSEL/FINANCIAL STATMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003
08/13/2003 08/13/2003
Comments: APPROVED
PD IS APPOINTED
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003
Comments: BURGLARY 2ND
ANPD 03-75354
HEARING FOR INITIAL APPEARANCE MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003 08/13/2003
08/13/2003
Comments: Preliminary Hearing 08/22/2003 08:00 AM DA03
Bond Review 08/14/2003 08:30 AM DA04
Bond set for 713.5 $13000 C/S
Total Bond $13000 C/S
Indexed PUBLIC DEFENDER-POLK COUNTYPIN-
PK1000375
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Orig Paid Due Summary
3501.70 3501.70 0.00 COSTS
0.00 0.00 0.00 FINE
125.00 125.00 0.00 SURCHARGE
0.00 0.00 0.00 RESTITUTION
27.50 27.50 0.00 OTHER
-------------------------------------
$3654.20 $3654.20 $0.00
WILLS, KENT B [ Collected Sept 13, 2009]
Age: 40
Rogers, AR
Ankeny, IA
Marshalltown, IA
Bartlett, IL
Villa Park, IL
And from another source: Hanover Park, IL
WILLS, FREDERICK ALFRED (Kent's Dad 65 )
WILLS, MICHAEL A (Kent's son ??)
WILLS, JANET RAE (Kent's Mom 62 )
HARTWIG,TIFFANY JEANNE (Wills) (Kent's sister )
From another source: Kelly M Wills Kent's wife ?? )
( Samantha T Wills, Kathleen M Wills, James Wills ? )
-----------------------------------
Consider the following:
If "our" Kent is NOT Kent Bradley Wills then
his ""Fake ID"" has worked well, so what's
the problem?
Consider Kent's OWN comments about:
A. regarding his sister (by name)
B. property in CORPORATION name (Wills Family Trust)
C. footage of "Wills" plaque avoiding first name
D. apt building at 202 NW College Ave Ankeny IA
E. past residence in various cities in IA
F. connection to Arkansas
G. that he set up/was assigned this ""Fake ID""
Does an actual Garage Burglary Felon have a
RIGHT to con people into thinking he ISN'T one?
Does a TWO time thieving Felon actually have
a right to conceal his record and a right
against having his record exposed?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/b9653f6758b592b8
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson, alt.law-enforcement, alt.usenet.kooks
From: Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com>
Local: Wed, Oct 15 2008 5:59 pm
> and running to Arkansas ain't gonna help you this time, Kent --
KBW > I've never run to Arkansas.
KBW > We have a house near Fort Smith, AR.
KBW > I'm confident your stalking has found
KBW > just where it is. You were able to
KBW > find my phone number from when I
KBW > lived in Chicago (you posted part
KBW > of it) back in 1988, so finding a
KBW > current address should have been
KBW > real easy for you.
2006 Assets Learning Conference Session III.8
Understanding the New Bankruptcy and Credit Laws:
Implications for the Field
Facilitated for the Assets Alliance by:
Janet Wills
Wills Resources
8250 Wills Court
Rogers, AR 72756
Phone & Fax Number: (479) 925-4001
E-mail: janetw...@yahoo.com
Ramona McKinney
Asset Builders Program Director
Southern Good Faith Fund
2304 West 29th Avenue
Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603
Phone Number: (870) 535-6233, ext. 15
E-mail: rmck...@southerngff.org
History of Bankruptcy
Roots of word traced to medieval Italy – “banco rotto” which means
broken bench
Early U. S. bankruptcy law was modification of British law
1800’s – First federal bankruptcy law signed by President John Adams
in 1800 2 more laws passed and repealed until the Bankruptcy Act of
1898
1900’s and Beyond
A bankruptcy environment that had as its focus helping debtors seek a
new start remained in place for most of 20th century.
By beginning of 21st century creditors successfully argued that this
current law and environment were too easy on debtors
BAPCPA
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005
was passed and went into effect October 19, 2005
Interruption in our presentation
There is a blank page in the back of your packet. As we are talking
today about bankruptcy and credit, please use it to jot down some of
your thoughts on how this new bankruptcy environment is going to
impact you and the people you serve.
Specifically write yourself a note or two about at least one
bankruptcy proceeding you know about personally. Then in 20 words or
less state what you think the contributing cause was for that person’s
financial problems.
We will want to hear your thoughts later.
Types of Bankruptcy
Chapter 7
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 7
For personal bankruptcy
Often referred to is liquidation bankruptcy
Debtors turn over nonessential assets to bankruptcy trustee, who then
sells it off and distributes proceeds to creditors eliminating debt
completely
This type of bankruptcy was most affected by the BAOCPA
Chapter 11
For corporations that want to reorganize their finances and remain in
business
Features a debt repayment plan
Chapter 12
For family farmers and fishermen
Features payment plan and debt restructuring
Chapter 13
For individuals
Features debt repayment plan
More individuals who previously would have filed under Chapter 7 will
be forced into Chapter 13
Changes with the BAPCPA
Means test
Required Credit Counseling
Required Debtor Education
Means Test
To qualify for Chapter 7 “liquidation bankruptcy” individual must pass
means test
Income must be below state’s median income
Or if it is above, debtor is subject to means test
Monthly income less allowed expenses
If after all these subtractions the total monthly disposable income is
less than $100 the debtor has passed the Means Test
Means Test cont.
If disposable income is more than $166.67 Means test is flunked and
debtor is not eligible for Chapter 7, must go to Chapter 13
If disposable income is between $100 and $166.67 then calculations are
figured to see if what is left over is enough to pay off more than 25%
of unsecured debt over 5 years.
In other words – the means test is not easy.
Required Credit Counseling
Debtors filing for Chapter 7 must complete required credit counseling
& debtors must pay for it.* Credit Counseling must be provided by a
qualifying 501(c)3 organization that has been approved by Bankruptcy
Trustees.
*fee can be waived
Debtor Education
2 hours required
Required topics
Budget Development
Setting short-term & long-term financial goals as well as developing
skills to assist in achieving these goals
Calculating gross monthly income & net monthly income
Identifying & classifying monthly expenses as fixed, variable, or
periodic
Debtor Education
Required topics cont
Money Management
Keeping adequate financial records
Developing decision-making skills required to distinguish between
wants and needs and to comparison shop for goods & services
Maintaining appropriate levels of insurance coverage, taking into
account the types and costs of insurance
Saving for emergences, for periodic payments, and for financial goals
Debtor education
required topics cont.
Wise Use of Credit
Types sources, and costs of credit & loans
Identifying debt warning signs
Appropriate use of credit & alternatives to credit use
Checking a credit rating
Debtor Education
required topics cont.
Consumer information
Public and non-profit resources for consumer assistance
Applicable consumer protection laws and regulations, such as those
governing correction of a credit record and protection against
consumer fraud
Approved credit counseling and debtor education can be provided
In person
Internet
Telephone
(can be approved for a combination of internet/telephone. That is the
approval we have)
www.usdoj.gov/ust/
The U. S. Trustees home page
A Huge wealth of information
www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/ccde/cc_approved.htm#AL
Web site (part of the trustee web site) for list of approved credit
counselors and debtor education providers
Click on state
Click on your judicial district
Bankruptcy and the Future
At first it’s a relief – you file for bankruptcy, the creditors stop
calling and harassing you, and the juggling act ends.
Many people who file bankruptcy ask, “Now what can I expect?”
Let’s begin looking at “what’s next” by completing the quiz.
Bankruptcy will expire from your credit report after 10 years.
Some credit reporting agencies may remove Chapter 13 after 7 years.
Bankruptcy is for life – if you apply for insurance, credit, or a job
you can be asked if you have ever filed for bankruptcy. There is no
time limit even if it is very old.
Bankruptcy will stay with me forever: True.
2. The accounts included in my bankruptcy will be removed from my
credit report upon discharge: False.
Accounts included in bankruptcy expire independently from bankruptcy.
These accounts will be marked “Included in BK” on the credit report.
They will remain up to 7 years after filing.
After discharge the balance must be reported as “0.”
I will never get credit again: False.
You can expect receive many offers of credit.
Many of these may be from unscrupulous creditors with activation fees
and/or membership fees.
There are “debtor-friendly” agencies that specialize in credit repair
loans.
Do not be too eager to get credit again – know the terms and
conditions of the credit.
I will not be able to by a home for 10 years: False.
There are some lenders who prefer to deal with consumers with good
credit and will not do business for the 10 years it remains.
It is not a quick fix, it may take those in Chapter 13 three to five
years to complete their payment plan.
With strides to rebuild credit and no new negative “marks,” you may be
able to receive a conventional mortgage within one to two years.
Even after bankruptcy I may still have some of my existing debt:
True.
Even with Chapter 7 not all debt will be discharged, it depends on the
type of debts that are owed.
Certain debts that cannot be discharged include: most taxes, child
support, most student loans, court fines and criminal restitution, and
personal injury.
Debts incurred after filing for bankruptcy will not be included.
I will lose all my property if I file for bankruptcy: False.
With Chapter 13, which is like a payment plan, you may be allowed to
keep property.
Chapter 7 involves the sale of all assets that are not exempt.
Exemptions differ from state to state but typically allow: equity in
home, insurance, retirement plans, personal property, car, public
benefits, and/or tools used on job.
Filing for bankruptcy will lower my credit score: True.
The drop in the credit score will depend on the type of debt and
payment history prior to filing.
Credit score is calculated using a complicated algorithm that takes
into account hundreds of factors and values.
It is very difficult to predict how the credit score will be affected
but bankruptcy is one of the most negative factors included in the
report.
I cannot file for bankruptcy for 8 years after discharge: True.
This is only true for Chapter 7.
Chapter 13 waiting period is shorter and can be as little as two
years.
After bankruptcy all my debts will be free and clear and I will have
peace of mind: False.
As stated in #5 all debts will not be discharged.
Bankruptcy is listed in the top five life-altering negative events
that one can go through.
Bankruptcy is life-altering and leaves deep wounds both to the psyche
and the credit report.
After bankruptcy I will need to take steps to protect myself from
another bankruptcy: True.
Even if the bankruptcy was through no fault of your own it will be a
good time to examine what led to bankruptcy to begin to prepare for
unforeseen events.
Take a critical look at spending and saving habits.
Implement strategies to control spending, develop a budget, and start
a savings plan.
Let’s Talk About It
Implications to the IDA field
The “typical” person seeking bankruptcy
Contributing causes
Key Words:
Kent Bradley Wills, Con Artist, Troll, Manipulator,
Attention Seeking Behavior,
Polish Immigrant,
Morton's Fork, Excluded Middle, False Dichotomy,
Fallacy, Black or White Fallacy, False Dilemma,
either-or fallacy, fallacy of false choice,
fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses,The Fallacy of the Missing Middle,
Bogus Dilemma, Bifurcation Fallacy, fallacy of Suppressed Evidence,
Sociopath, Psychopath, Criminal, Felon,
Garage Burglar, Two Time Felon, Confidence Artist,
Con Artist, Sociopathic Reasoning,
http://home.comcast.net/~kaldis/Xns996259.txt
Path: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net!wnmaster12!wn13feed!
worldnet.att.net!216.196.98.141!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!
local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:46:16 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson,alt.law-enforcement,misc.legal
Subject: You wanted information about Kent Bradley Wills?
From: Doc Savage <xxxr...@cambs.edu>
Organization: Who, moi?
Message-ID: <Xns996259...@216.196.109.131>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:46:17 -0500
Lines: 280
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-g9k+lpZkZTB0PdHxmkMB8peH/NJmgawPMG5j
+YfjKtLsC5MEdAtpKYpvhawEcEpA49gJBwEqhUVT9W8!
r6UL6tcH4l3tDZxNmw48T3tAWw7lmFpEQNRFhd1Yp1WmxQH0o270WCpLBFQ7mE4=
X-Complaints-To: ab...@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.35
Bytes: 11367
X-Original-Bytes: 11323
Xref: wnmaster12 alt.fan.bob-larson:96767 alt.law-enforcement:686035
misc.legal:443517
X-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 07:47:37 GMT (bgtnsc04-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net)
Here ya go. All public information
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/SelectFrame
Click on Trial Court Case Search on the right
That opens the input dialogue page. You may be able to go straight
to
it from this link, or it may be my cache opening the page
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/TrialSimpFrame
Type Wills Kent Bradley in the top boxes, it doesn't matter if you
capialise or not, then hit the search button
The search returns four hits
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT B WILLS WILLS KENT 01/08/1969
DEFENDANT
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS WILLS KENT 01/08/1969
DEFENDANT
05771 STAN201670 STATE OF IOWA vs WILLS, KENT BRADLEY WILLS KENT
01/08/1969 DEFENDANT
05771 STAN210929 STATE OF IOWA vs WILLS, KENT BRADLEY WILLS KENT
01/08/1969 DEFENDANT
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT B WILLS 01/08/1969 DEFENDANT
Reading through these shows that Kent served time in Fort Des Moines
and
it looks like he also served 100 days in the county slammer.
I'm not sure about US Law, and I forgot to ask when I last posted in
us.legal, but doesn't serving time in Ft Des Moines mean that you can
never teach school in the US?
For the record, you can reverse search for Kenny through his parents
names. They are Frederick (Fred) Alfred (A) Wills, and Janet Rae (R)
Wills, who owned 202 NW College Ave Ankeny Ia50021-2136
That isn't totally accurate. Fred bought the place, but Fred and
Janet
sold it, despite Kennys claims that he bought and sold it.
There are also planning permit applications listed in various
newspapers, purchase of a new duplex in Rogers, committee minutes and
reports, engagement and wedding announcements. I have around 400
pages
of stuff.
Kents birthday. Search alt.friends using the dates January 7 and 8.
He's made no secret of it over the years.
Just for fun, here's part of an email I got back from the Iowa DOC
when
I asked a few questions about his claim to have falsified the court
records. It's easy done, and they're very open if you are polite,
but
be sure your personal details are verifiable when they check on you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Olson, Fay [DOC] On Behalf Of Information, DOC
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 8:02 AM
To: Lauterbach, Charles [DOC]
Subject: FW: One of your probationers
Importance: High
Kent Bradley Wills, #1155768.Would you please respond to this e-mail
(from the DOC web site). Thank you. Fay
The phone number for the Arkansas Department of Corrections compact
office is (501)682-9584.
<snip info which I can't legally post>
--------------------------------------
It certainly looks like they know you in Iowa Kenny.
I also received this one;
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lauterbach, Charles [DOC]" <Charles.L...@iowa.gov>
To:
Cc: "Hornocker, Jan [DOC]" <Jan.Ho...@iowa.gov>;
<ard...@arkansas.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 3:33 PM
Subject: RE: Probationer Kent Bradley Wills IA # 1155768
Janice- Please see message below FYI.
Wills is being supervised in the State of Arkansas. The phone number
for
the Arkansas Department of Corrections compact office is
(501)682-9584.
<snip more information>
------------------------------------
And then the Arkansas DOC sent me this one. LOL, I got a gagging
order
issued against Wills for lying and making anti semitic commentary.
ardccic[at]arkansas[dot]gov
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Towner
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:38 PM
To: AR DCC Interstate Compact
Cc: Vince Morris
Subject: FW: Probationer Kent Bradley Wills IA # 1155768
Subject: FW: Probationer Kent Bradley Wills IA # 1155768
PPO Mike Markum and I met with Kent Wills this day at the probation
office. Respecting confidentiality for all concerned, this matter has
been resolved as follows: Kent Bradley Wills has been advised to
cease
contact of any kind related to, or with, Rabbi Goldblum. If Wills
disobeys this directive, do not hesitate to contact us.
-----------------------------------------------------
>>all, then forged the Appellate Ruling which DENIED his appeal as being
>>without merit ?
>>
>
> I made no such forgery.
>
Oh, naughty naughty Kent. Wash your mouth with soapy water.
Path:
border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub2.home.nl!
newshub1.home.nl!home.nl!skynet.be!newsfeed.news2me.com!
newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!
newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!
newssvr29.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!86707a39!not-for-mail
From: Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.friends
Subject: Re: FFS
Organization: None that I know about.
Reply-To: comp...@gmail.com
Message-ID: <1hshd21ctmf8g2pqg...@4ax.com>
References: <op.tdvj1...@fx62.mshome.net>
<jlecd29jmeup0qjp7...@4ax.com>
<op.tdvmb...@fx62.mshome.net> <Xns981835E8640C0Doc@
216.196.109.144>
<hcOdnRAPS7D...@giganews.com>
<13cfd25fvdrpq1qmi...@4ax.com>
<Xns981935...@216.196.109.144>
<44d87cee$0$17975$892e...@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 77
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.152.199.248
X-Complaints-To: ab...@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr29.news.prodigy.net 1155070394 ST000 69.152.199.248
(Tue, 08
Aug 2006 16:53:14 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:53:14 EDT
X-UserInfo1:
SCSGW_[DXBRYSTXXHBCBNWX@RJ_XPDLMN@GZ_GYO^BSZUSAANVUEAE[YETZPIWWI
[FCIZA^NBFXZ_D[BFNTCNVPDTNTKHWXKB@X^B_OCJLPZ@ET_O[G\XSG@E\G
[ZKVLBL^CJINM@I_KVIOR\T_M_AW_M[_BWU_HFA_]@A_A^SGFAUDE_DFTMQPFWVW[QPJN
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:53:14 GMT
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.friends:43706
I have it on good authority that on Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:01:23 -0500,
"TNKev" <service...@adodgedealer.invalid> wrote:
>Doc Savage wrote:
>> Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:13cfd25fvdrpq1qmi...@4ax.com:
>>
>
>
>ROTFLMAO!
>
>no way, not Kent!
>
Why not? I mean, I can break into cars... Um... Do they still
make black jacks for things like that?
Short version:
About a year ago some of the IT guys with the Fifth Judicial
District in Des Moines, Iowa helped me set a trap for Doc. While I
was certain he found it, I presumed his lack of mentioning it meant he
saw it for the trap it was and disregarded it.
Some of the clues that the information is bogus:
1) The two felonies listed are both 10 year felonies. The
misdemeanor is a five year sentence (though probation is permitted for
first time offenders under Iowa's sentencing laws -- the first time
offender bit will become more important later on).
Even if served concurrently, it's a 10 year sentence. Iowa
law requires a minimum of one third of a sentence be served before the
offender is *eligible* to see the parole board. Being granted an
interview with the board doesn't mean the offender will get parole.
A minimum of three and one third years in prison would have to
have been served. Try to find a three year gap in my posting history.
2) It takes a bit of digging, but the address listed as my
place of residence is a closed and abandoned hotel in Ankeny. I
haven't lived in Ankeny, regardless of location, since 1998.
3) A previous felony conviction is listed (this is why the
first time offender bit was and is important as it means probation was
NOT an option). Under Iowa's Three Strikes and You're Out law, a
third felony means a MINIMUM of 25 years in prison. Again, Iowa law
requires one third of the sentence be served before the offender is
allowed to seek parole.
That's roughly eight and one third years. I've been on Usenet
since 1993. I encourage everyone to find an eight year gap in my
posting history.
4) Let's pretend I somehow managed to con probation out of the
judge (in violation of Iowa's sentencing laws -- one of the felonies
is Using a Juvenile to Commit and Indictable Offence which is
MANDATORY prison time). I went to Aruba in February. Scans of some
of the pictures (including the TSA luggage tag, my passport stamp
showing entry and exit dates, and so on) can be seen at:
http://www.geocities.com/compuelf/aruba2006
The best image is the TSA tag. It's a Federal felony to forge
one. Either it's legitimate, or I'm one cocky guy.
TSA would know if I was on probation, and I wouldn't have been
allowed to go to South America, since there's no guaranty I would
return to finish my sentence.
There's more, but I discussed this to death in misc.legal. If
anyone wants to know the rest (part of it involves a name Doc posted
under in this very group), E-mail me and I'll let you know.
- - -
Kent
If Mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy.
If Daddy ain't happy, don't nobody care!
There was an earlier article in the trial discussion when Kenny
claimed
he had the trial data posted for Theo, but I'll let that little slip
pass for now.
With a little bit of digging and reading Peter Huckers replies to
Kents
posts in alt.friends, anyone can find the claim he made about carrying
a
.32 cal handgun in his pickup.
That was right after Kent lied about the age of the juvenile he took
out
burglarizing garages and parked cars at 1am, and all for what? An
electronic pocket organiser, a diamond ring and $20 in change.
On the subject of wives and kids, why are there no listings for
Richard
and why can nobody in the Iowa Justice system find any references to
any
psychologist named Lindsay? LOL, I rented out rooms to a retired US
Circuit Court Judge who tutored in US Law when I was at Cambridge.
I can find recent listings and records for Amy D Wills, Samantha T
Wills
and Kelly M Wills all sharing some of the same addresses as you, your
parents and your sister Tiffany, but even a professional search
failed
to turn up any evidence of there ever being a wife named Lindsay and
a
son named Richard.
How can you tell Wills is lying?
His lips are moving and his hand is near a computer keyboard.
Kent Wills
Most find the truth nice. That you do not is accepted. At least
by me. No one else has tried to suggest that you do not, so at this
point, I presume that you do not find truth to be nice is accepted by
anyone and everyone reading.
>
>KBW > I didn't. I suggested you might prefer the
>KBW > LACK of evidence from you to support
>KBW > your claim,
>
>G > This one?
>
>KBW > No. Please explain just why you NEED to
>KBW > dishonestly present that it could be. What
>KBW > is the SPECIFIC cause of this latest act of
>KBW > dishonesty on your part? Serious question.
>
>The loaded question gag is closely related to the
>excluded middle or false dilemma fallacy.
>eg. "Have you stopped beating your dog?"
Avoidance, and tacit admission, by YOUR standards, that there is
a specific cause for your latest act of deception is accepted.
>
>============================
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/e2152c0150972ae4
>
>KBW > As you already KNOW, I don't have an
>KBW > account with Eternal September.
>
>===========================
>
>G > Running off at the keyboard again, Kent!
>
>KBW > You may call the truth I present by any phrase you wish.
>
>It's funny when you ""speechify"" Kent.
>It reveals some insecurity.
Your tacit admission, by YOUR standards, that I have been
presenting the truth is accepted.
Don't you just HATE it when I adopt your style and standards,
Greg?
Run off to your daisy chain, crying about how I'm being so mean
to you. They'll build you back up, never pointing out that I've only
used your own style and standards.
--a true story
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.
Me: Hey, he used your standards.
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson: It's textbook psychopathic
reasoning.
Greg admitting his standards are psychopathic.
In MID
<2afdd85e-3b16-4829...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
Greg writes, "I think Kent plays too many fantasy games
or watches too much fantasy TV." making it very clear he thinks
Greegor
Greegor47
f068a3...@36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com:
Why do you molest children, Greg?
--
"Sometimes I think the Time Lord live too long."
-- The Doctor in 'The End of Time' Part two
Greegor
Coward impersonater hiding behind an anonymous remailer.
How amazing is that, Kent?
Greegor
Kent Wills
>On Feb 14, 6:11�pm, Greegor47 <x...@xxx.xxx> wrote: [ snip ]
>
>Coward impersonater hiding behind an anonymous remailer.
There is no anonymous remailer used in the post to which you
refer.
Why LIE about it, Greg? Why, exactly, are you so DESPERATE to
distract from the truth that a normal news server was used?
What is the SPECIFIC reason you want people to think a remailer
was used, when you can tell from the headers that this is not the
case?
Serious questions, Greg.
>How amazing is that, Kent?
SOP for you and your daisy chain.
I honestly suspect it was you and that you learned the trick from
Pangborn. I know of no way to prove this, so it will likely remain a
suspicion.
Will you claim to be the victim of a witch hunt now?
--a true story
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
In MID
<2afdd85e-3b16-4829...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
Greg writes, "I think Kent plays too many fantasy games
or watches too much fantasy TV." making it very clear he thinks
Greegor
Kent Wills
>Boring.
How is it that you find my exposing the most probable truth to be
boring?
BTW, by YOUR standards, you've made the tacit admission that my
suspicion that you are the person who posted the troll post was and is
correct. I'll be sure to point this out from time to time.
--a true story
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
In MID
<2afdd85e-3b16-4829...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
Greg makes it very clear he thinks reality TV shows are fantasy.
Greegor
http://www.myspace.com/29801731
http://www.myspace.com/KBWILLS
http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/loadques.html
Kent's Appeal
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
PDF
HTML
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
http://www.rogersgis.com/zoom/Residential_Development/indexfull.htm
http://www.arcountydata.com/county.asp?county=Benton
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
SUMMARY
Kent's Appeal
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
HTML
WIGGINS, Justice.
II. Scope of Review.
III. Analysis.
Id. § 702.12.
(Emphasis added.)
IV. Disposition.
AFFIRMED.
---------------------------------
GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000
A Larger photo:
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Check this out!
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Under the "Filings" tab:
Under the "Financial" Tab:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 98.60 31.00 67.60
FINE 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
----------------------------------------
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Defendant: WILLS, KENT BRADLEY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Consider the following:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/b9653f6758b592b8
Key Words:
http://home.comcast.net/~kaldis/Xns996259.txt
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/SelectFrame
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/TrialSimpFrame
<snip more information>
------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
Short version:
http://www.geocities.com/compuelf/aruba2006
How can you tell Wills is lying?
His lips are moving and his hand is near a computer keyboard.
Kent Wills
Context restored at no additional cost.
>>At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Boring.
>>
>> How is it that you find my exposing the most probable truth to be
>>boring?
>> BTW, by YOUR standards, you've made the tacit admission that my
>>suspicion that you are the person who posted the troll post was and is
>>correct. I'll be sure to point this out from time to time.
>
>
>Kent Wills AKA Kent Bradley Wills AKA Compuelf AKA (various)
>DOB Jan 8 1969 Two Felony Garage Burglar used teen as accomplice
>
[Snip Greg's most recent tacit admission, by his standards, that I was
and am 100% in my claims]
Your deceptive rant makes no sense in context.
Since you openly admit the information you've posted as if it
were about me isn't about me, please explain why you continue to post
it. Yes, by YOUR standards, you've admitted it's due to your
continued use and abuse of illegal drugs, but I would like more.
--a true story
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.
Me: Hey, he used your standards.
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson: It's textbook psychopathic
reasoning.
Greg admitting his standards are psychopathic.
In MID
<2afdd85e-3b16-4829...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
Greg writes, "I think Kent plays too many fantasy games
or watches too much fantasy TV." making it very clear he thinks
Greegor
Kent Wills
Context restored at no additional cost.
I understand you NEED to remove the context, Greg. It's a part
of your deeply rooted psychological NEED to lie.
Ultimately, it does me no harm. I simply restore the context,
further PROVING that you are UNABLE to be honest, unless you make a
mistake or are forced in some way.
>>
>>Context restored at no additional cost.
>>
>>>>At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Boring.
>>>>
>>>> How is it that you find my exposing the most probable truth to be
>>>>boring?
>>>> BTW, by YOUR standards, you've made the tacit admission that my
>>>>suspicion that you are the person who posted the troll post was and is
>>>>correct. I'll be sure to point this out from time to time.
>>>
>>>
>>>Kent Wills AKA Kent Bradley Wills AKA Compuelf AKA (various)
>>>DOB Jan 8 1969 Two Felony Garage Burglar used teen as accomplice
>>>
>>
>>[Snip Greg's most recent tacit admission, by his standards, that I was
>>and am 100% in my claims]
>>
>> Your deceptive rant makes no sense in context.
>> Since you openly admit the information you've posted as if it
>>were about me isn't about me, please explain why you continue to post
>>it. Yes, by YOUR standards, you've admitted it's due to your
>>continued use and abuse of illegal drugs, but I would like more.
>
>
>Did you ever even apologize to the Weibens, Kent?
For what? I don't even know anyone with that name.
BTW, your reply makes no sense in context. I do appreciate that,
by your standards, you once again made the tacit admission that I was
and am 100% in my claims.
Since you have, by your own standards, admitted to authoring and
posting the troll post, please explain why you did it. What was your
motivation for attacking yourself?
I think it's because of your NEED to be a victim. You weren't
being attacked like you want, so you were compelled to attack
yourself.
The spelling error was a nice touch. Until you admitted, by your
standards, that it was you, I did wonder. While you can and do make
some errors in spelling, to spell baby wrong threw me for a bit.
Greegor
KBW > For what? I don't even know anyone with that name.
Did the victim family testify at your Garage Burglary trial, Kent?
Compuelf
Is that the trial you openly admit was and is a [fictional] story
and was never about me?
Since you admited the trial wasn't mine, and that all of your
claims are nothing more than stories, I must ask why you keep posting
the claims? I've asked you this many times, and you've never
answered.
Yes, you have, by your standards, admited that your doing so is
a result of your use and abuse of illegal drugs, and I've accepted
this, but I would like more.
Greegor
http://www.myspace.com/29801731
http://www.myspace.com/KBWILLS
http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/loadques.html
Kent's Appeal
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
PDF
HTML
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
http://www.rogersgis.com/zoom/Residential_Development/indexfull.htm
http://www.arcountydata.com/county.asp?county=Benton
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
SUMMARY
Kent's Appeal
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
HTML
WIGGINS, Justice.
II. Scope of Review.
III. Analysis.
Id. § 702.12.
(Emphasis added.)
IV. Disposition.
AFFIRMED.
---------------------------------
GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000
A Larger photo:
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Check this out!
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Under the "Filings" tab:
Under the "Financial" Tab:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 98.60 31.00 67.60
FINE 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
Greegor
Kent Wills
>Hi Kent
Clearly you wrote that while high on the illegal drugs you admit
you use and abuse. You replied to yourself.
Not even your Fregoli, or psychological INABILITY to be honest,
unless you make a mistake or are forced, could allow you to think you
and I are the same person.
Get the help you've once again PROVED you need for your drug
problem. You've admitted you have it, which is important, but you
need more. You won't beat your distinction alone. It's going to
prove far harder to beat than you ex-wife.
--a true story
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
Kent Wills
>You won't beat your distinction alone.
That should be addiction, not distinction. I apologize for the
error and for any confusion my mistake may have made.
--
I did an unbelievable amount of work in the yard. It's amazing what I
can do when my wife puts my mind to it. :)