Re: Mail Order YOUR Bride From Cuba (like Ken Pangborn didn't!)
krp
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixm...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote in
message news:b714d91172602702...@remailer.privacy.at...
> http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
Nice try FAIRY. BUT the first line of that page states: "We're sorry,
but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our database."
You are a TIRELESS LIAR Moore.
Greegor
On Dec 29, 9:19 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> LITTLE SISSY DAVID MOORE
> "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmas...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote in
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/273c7b2aaf9964ee
http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
> Nice try FAIRY. BUT the first line of that page states: "We're sorry,
> but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our database."
>
> You are a TIRELESS LIAR Moore.
You are one hell of a hacker, Dave! LOL
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cee09cce-1217-4479...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.cuba/msg/273c7b2aaf9964ee
http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
GH> You are one hell of a hacker, Dave! LOL
Look at MACHO MAN Moore's post and his display of COURAGE.. The post
with his claim shows:
More options Dec 29, 5:00 am
Newsgroups: soc.culture.cuba, soc.men, fl.general
From: "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmas...@remailer.privacy.at>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:00:14 +0100 (CET)
Local: Tues, Dec 29 2009 5:00 am
Subject: Mail Order YOUR Bride From Cuba (like Ken Pangborn did!)
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original |
Report this message | Find messages by this author
Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This
message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Jan 5, 5:00 am).
http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
Davey thinks he has "PROVED" that there ARE Cuban mail order brides. YET -
YET the site says they have NONE in their database, and 100% of their "mail
order brides" seem to be from Belarus. The search engine listing for "Cuban
mail order brides" is just a SCAM to get people to LOOK at their site. It's
classic internet BULLSHIT false advertising. But it is SO - well, SO David
Mooreish!
Kent Wills
wrote:
Projection is a bad thing, Ken. You should cease.
That you are a TIRELESS LIAR is proved, yet again, by the fact
that you failed to include what else is stated. It plainly shows that
while they don't currently have any Cuban women in their database,
they are SOLICITING FOR THEM TO LIST.
"Cuban Women
"We're sorry, but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our
database.
"Are you woman from Cuba? Seeking man for long term relationship
or marriage? Post your profile for free."
BTW, not everyone who makes use of a remailer is David. Really.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team claiming in misc.legal
that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dj9mj5dual5vca9vg...@4ax.com...
>>> http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
>>
>> Nice try FAIRY. BUT the first line of that page states: "We're sorry,
>>but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our database."
>>
>> You are a TIRELESS LIAR Moore.
> Projection is a bad thing, Ken. You should cease.
HA HA HA. You're funny, WIlls.
> That you are a TIRELESS LIAR is proved, yet again, by the fact
> that you failed to include what else is stated. It plainly shows that
> while they don't currently have any Cuban women in their database,
> they are SOLICITING FOR THEM TO LIST.
Yeah for 10 YEARS with NO luck, YOU fail to mention THAT. It's a "COME
ON" Kunt. A "BAIT AND SWITCH."
> "Cuban Women
> "We're sorry, but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our
> database.
> "Are you woman from Cuba? Seeking man for long term relationship
> or marriage? Post your profile for free."
> BTW, not everyone who makes use of a remailer is David. Really.
Look POLACK, let me explain this to you. I know that MANY people use
remailers who are NOT David Moore. HOWEVER there are really easy ways to
spot the anonymous posts that ARE from our little fairy, Moore. First by
what newsgroups the prick posts to and crossposts to. In other words
STALKING ME where he knows *I* participate. 99.999999998% of the folks who
use remailers don't do that. I dare suggest that DIPSHIT MOORE is the ONLY
remailer user who has ever posted to the CUBAN newsgroups. Plus some others.
It doesn't take a rocket scientists to follow THAT, plus the SUBJECTS the
asshole posts on. 100% of the time - something to do with ME. Now, KUNT,
how many people who use anonymous remailers do you think are TOTALLY
OBSESSED with ME? Dozens? Hundreds? Thousands? MILLIONS?
The old adage applies - - If it waddles like a duck, quacks like a duck,
has feathers like a duck, looks like a duck, and lays eggs like a duck,
almost certainly it's a duck! UNLESS you are a POLACK then it looks like a
naked lady.
Kent Wills
wrote:
From the site:
"Cuban Women
"We're sorry, but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our
database.
"Are you woman from Cuba? Seeking man for long term relationship
or marriage? Post your profile for free."
Is there a SPECIFIC reason you're not including the full context?
Is the truth that difficult for you?
"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team accidentally admitting
he alters the context of posts when he replies.
MID FyUom.1363$Jd7....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:dj9mj5dual5vca9vg...@4ax.com...
>
>>>> http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
>>>
>>> Nice try FAIRY. BUT the first line of that page states: "We're sorry,
>>>but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our database."
>>>
>>> You are a TIRELESS LIAR Moore.
>
>> Projection is a bad thing, Ken. You should cease.
>
> HA HA HA. You're funny, WIlls.
You find the truth funny? Um, OK.
>
>
>> That you are a TIRELESS LIAR is proved, yet again, by the fact
>> that you failed to include what else is stated. It plainly shows that
>> while they don't currently have any Cuban women in their database,
>> they are SOLICITING FOR THEM TO LIST.
>
> Yeah for 10 YEARS with NO luck, YOU fail to mention THAT. It's a "COME
>ON" Kunt. A "BAIT AND SWITCH."
So you claim. Offer the proof, unless another of your MANY
drunken pathological lies has been exposed.
>
>> "Cuban Women
>> "We're sorry, but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our
>> database.
>
>> "Are you woman from Cuba? Seeking man for long term relationship
>> or marriage? Post your profile for free."
>> BTW, not everyone who makes use of a remailer is David. Really.
>
> Look POLACK, let me explain this to you. I know that MANY people use
>remailers who are NOT David Moore.
Yet you claim EVERY one of them is him.
Odd that.
>HOWEVER there are really easy ways to
>spot the anonymous posts that ARE from our little fairy, Moore. First by
>what newsgroups the prick posts to and crossposts to. In other words
>STALKING ME where he knows *I* participate. 99.999999998% of the folks who
>use remailers don't do that.
If they wish to ensure you read what they post, they might well do
just that.
>I dare suggest that DIPSHIT MOORE is the ONLY
>remailer user who has ever posted to the CUBAN newsgroups.
You may suggest anything you wish. This doesn't make it true.
>Plus some others.
>It doesn't take a rocket scientists to follow THAT, plus the SUBJECTS the
>asshole posts on. 100% of the time - something to do with ME. Now, KUNT,
You're gay. No one cares. Time to try something different as
your desire to claim a pre-emptive strike for gay bashing will never
be realized.
>how many people who use anonymous remailers do you think are TOTALLY
>OBSESSED with ME? Dozens? Hundreds? Thousands? MILLIONS?
No. Where is the proof the person who posted is obsessed with
you?
>
> The old adage applies - - If it waddles like a duck, quacks like a duck,
>has feathers like a duck, looks like a duck, and lays eggs like a duck,
>almost certainly it's a duck!
So you ARE an obese alcoholic with no means of support beyond the
welfare check you get. Got it.
>UNLESS you are a POLACK then it looks like a
>naked lady.
That you're a bigot has long been accepted. It's great that you
wish to offer more proof, but since it's not being contested, there
really is no need.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/race.html contains a very small sample
of the PROOF your provided that you're proud of your bigotry.
"Miranda was a STUPID WASTE OF TIME AND DID NOTHING!"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting and The A-Team.
krp
>>
>>>>> http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
>>>>
>>>> Nice try FAIRY. BUT the first line of that page states: "We're
>>>> sorry,
>>>>but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our database."
>>>>
>>>> You are a TIRELESS LIAR Moore.
>>
>>> Projection is a bad thing, Ken. You should cease.
>>
>> HA HA HA. You're funny, WIlls.
>
> You find the truth funny? Um, OK.
>
>>
>>
>>> That you are a TIRELESS LIAR is proved, yet again, by the fact
>>> that you failed to include what else is stated. It plainly shows that
>>> while they don't currently have any Cuban women in their database,
>>> they are SOLICITING FOR THEM TO LIST.
>>
>> Yeah for 10 YEARS with NO luck, YOU fail to mention THAT. It's a "COME
>>ON" Kunt. A "BAIT AND SWITCH."
>
> So you claim. Offer the proof, unless another of your MANY
> drunken pathological lies has been exposed
The PROOF - MORON is their own admission. They have NO Cuba "brides" listed
in their database and NEVER HAVE HAD. So Davey's FEEBLE attempt along with
YOUR bullshit with your stupid claims that my wife *IS* in FACT a "mail
order bride" really shows what morons you two are. Your "PROOF" contradicts
your bullshit claims.
krp
>>>>>>> http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
>>>>> Nice try FAIRY. BUT the first line of that page states: "We're
>>>>> sorry,
>>>>>>but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our database."
>>>>>> You are a TIRELESS LIAR Moore.
>>>>
>>>>> Projection is a bad thing, Ken. You should cease.
>>>> HA HA HA. You're funny, Wills.
>>> You find the truth funny? Um, OK.
Truth? Wills YOUY wouildn't know what it was if it bit your dick off!
>>>>> That you are a TIRELESS LIAR is proved, yet again, by the fact
>>>>> that you failed to include what else is stated. It plainly shows that
>>>>> while they don't currently have any Cuban women in their database,
>>>>> they are SOLICITING FOR THEM TO LIST.
>>>> Yeah for 10 YEARS with NO luck, YOU fail to mention THAT. It's a
>>>> "COME
>>>>ON" Kunt. A "BAIT AND SWITCH."
>>> So you claim. Offer the proof, unless another of your MANY
>>> drunken pathological lies has been exposed
>>The PROOF - MORON is their own admission. They have NO Cuba "brides"
>>listed
>>in their database and NEVER HAVE HAD.
> Then explain why you were compelled to distort the context by
> snipping where I included the bit about seeking Cubans?
Relavency, dipshit? They haven't found even ONE in a decade.THE POINT is
they DON'T HAVE ANY. But with yopu being a POLACK I don't expect you to be
able to understand that!
> The site doesn't CURRENTLY host any names, but they are seeking them.
> Here's the text again:
> "Cuban Women
> "We're sorry, but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in ourdatabase.
> "Are you woman from Cuba? Seeking man for long term relationship
> or marriage? Post your profile for free."
Here, MORON, let me help you with that. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY and NEVER
HAVE. Cubans have almost NO access to "SURF THE NET" and placing women's
names would be a crime in Cuba. The women would likely get a visit from the
police. But ALL OF THAT is "irrelevant" "immaterial" and BESIDE THE POINT,
dumbass. They DON'T HAVE ANY. Your pal's point was that I *got* my wife
there. What part of that don't you understand?
> That none are listed is not a point of contention. I even accept
> that they never have, though the site doesn't make this claim.
> Once again you PROVE that you MUST distract from the truth. It's
> not working.
Look MORON, thery state simply they have NONE in their data base. It
isn't just that none are listed. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY!
>>So Davey's FEEBLE attempt along with YOUR bullshit with your stupid claims
>>that my wife *IS* in FACT a "mail
>>order bride"
> I've made no such claim.
You both have repeatedly made the claim, BUT I can understand WHY you
need to try to deny it now. That's one of your main gigs, to make outlandish
claims, and when the falsity of your claims is proven, you deny ever making
them. And MOORE is desperate enough to make HIS claims expire. Pretty
cowardly.
Greegor
krp
> Kent, Do you think you are winning something?
He's going great guns on this "mail order bride" website, telling
himself he is making GREAT points with his POLACK LOGIC. He's patting
himself on the back in his drunken belief that he has PROVED yet again that
I got my wife by mail order even though is PROOF SITE says they have never
HAD any Cuban women listed. I have an idea, Kent can take a photo of
himself in one of his dresses and sent it in and tell them he's Cuban. Our
boy Kent doesn't seem to understand the more he makes noise on this issue
the more deranged he proves himself to be.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Kent, Do you think you are winning something?
Ken and I are not the same person. Really.
You reply to Ken's post yet use my name. If it was a typo and
you intended to write Ken, so be it. If not, then you've once again
offered PROOF that your mental state is shoddy at best.
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009:
Financials
Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT
Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN)
Citation Number:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.
"I am now a "founded" child abuser for making a
7 year old take a fast cold shower."
-- Gregory Scot "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson bragging in MID
<cu6H6.14493$3c6.3...@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>
In Message-ID:
<c7be6a38-8d1d-4c0a...@n38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson admitted that by his standards,
he RAPED his ex-wife. The same ex-wife he was twice convicted for
BEATING.
In Message-ID:
<8db2eada-0546-4c1a...@n38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson admits that his use and abuse of
illegal drugs forced him to LIE about the existence of certain
photographs.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:rubnj5l0eqbkslsk3...@4ax.com...
>
>>>>>>>> http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
>
>>>>>> Nice try FAIRY. BUT the first line of that page states: "We're
>>>>>> sorry,
>>>>>>>but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our database."
>
>>>>>>> You are a TIRELESS LIAR Moore.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Projection is a bad thing, Ken. You should cease.
>
>>>>> HA HA HA. You're funny, Wills.
>
>>>> You find the truth funny? Um, OK.
>
>
> Truth? Wills YOUY wouildn't know what it was if it bit your dick off!
>
Do you often think of my genitals?
No need to answer, you've offered the proof that you have a
crush on me so often, no one is willing to try and deny it.
>>>>>> That you are a TIRELESS LIAR is proved, yet again, by the fact
>>>>>> that you failed to include what else is stated. It plainly shows that
>>>>>> while they don't currently have any Cuban women in their database,
>>>>>> they are SOLICITING FOR THEM TO LIST.
>
>>>>> Yeah for 10 YEARS with NO luck, YOU fail to mention THAT. It's a
>>>>> "COME
>>>>>ON" Kunt. A "BAIT AND SWITCH."
>
>>>> So you claim. Offer the proof, unless another of your MANY
>>>> drunken pathological lies has been exposed
>
>>>The PROOF - MORON is their own admission. They have NO Cuba "brides"
>>>listed
>>>in their database and NEVER HAVE HAD.
>
>> Then explain why you were compelled to distort the context by
>> snipping where I included the bit about seeking Cubans?
>
> Relavency, dipshit? They haven't found even ONE in a decade.THE POINT is
>they DON'T HAVE ANY. But with yopu being a POLACK I don't expect you to be
>able to understand that!
That they don't have any is not in dispute.
I do wish you would stick to points of contention rather than
ranting and raving about that which all agree.
>
>> The site doesn't CURRENTLY host any names, but they are seeking them.
>> Here's the text again:
>
>> "Cuban Women
>
>> "We're sorry, but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in ourdatabase.
>> "Are you woman from Cuba? Seeking man for long term relationship
>> or marriage? Post your profile for free."
>
> Here, MORON, let me help you with that.
You're going to help yourself? That will be funny.
>THEY DON'T HAVE ANY and NEVER
>HAVE.
That you are reduced to debating a point not in contention only
serves to PROVE you've lost and you know it.
>Cubans have almost NO access to "SURF THE NET" and placing women's
>names would be a crime in Cuba. The women would likely get a visit from the
>police. But ALL OF THAT is "irrelevant" "immaterial" and BESIDE THE POINT,
>dumbass. They DON'T HAVE ANY. Your pal's point was that I *got* my wife
>there. What part of that don't you understand?
I saw no such claim from anyone.
Perhaps you misunderstood the post?
FYI: I don't know who posted it, so while I may be pals with the
poster, there is nothing to support your deceptive claim.
>
>> That none are listed is not a point of contention. I even accept
>> that they never have, though the site doesn't make this claim.
>> Once again you PROVE that you MUST distract from the truth. It's
>> not working.
>
> Look MORON, thery state simply they have NONE in their data base. It
>isn't just that none are listed. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY!
>
You lost and known it. Got it.
>
>
>>>So Davey's FEEBLE attempt along with YOUR bullshit with your stupid claims
>>>that my wife *IS* in FACT a "mail
>>>order bride"
>
>> I've made no such claim.
>
> You both have repeatedly made the claim,
Prove it, unless you would rather admit another of your MANY
drunken pathological lies has been exposed.
The choice is yours.
>BUT I can understand WHY you
>need to try to deny it now. That's one of your main gigs, to make outlandish
>claims, and when the falsity of your claims is proven, you deny ever making
>them.
That's YOUR party trick.
But by all means, play fetch and PROVE I've claimed Barbara is a
mail-order-bride or admit another of your drunken pathological lies
has been exposed.
>And MOORE is desperate enough to make HIS claims expire. Pretty
>cowardly.
>
Huh?
How does a claim expire? Please be specific, unless you would
rather admit I've caught you in another drunken lie.
"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
Greegor
Loved the beemer photos, Kent!
The boat was cute too.
Too bad about that boat registration the last time you tried this!
One of your "fleet" no doubt.
But I really thought the Chairkool PERFECT LIAR video
was more telling about you.
Even Photobucket decided one of your pictures
was a terms of use violation.
womanGoddess
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:rubnj5l0eqbkslsk3...@4ax.com...
>
> >>>>>>>http://www.rosebrides.com/cuban-brides.html
> >>>>> Nice try FAIRY. BUT the first line of that page states: "We're
> >>>>> sorry,
> >>>>>>but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in our database."
> >>>>>> You are a TIRELESS LIAR Moore.
>
> >>>>> Projection is a bad thing, Ken. You should cease.
> >>>> HA HA HA. You're funny, Wills.
> >>> You find the truth funny? Um, OK.
>
> Truth? Wills YOUY wouildn't know what it was if it bit your dick off!
Dick biting, huh Kennie? You into that now as well?Is that a
homosexual act?
And please check your spelling before you post. Seriously.
>
> >>>>> That you are a TIRELESS LIAR is proved, yet again, by the fact
> >>>>> that you failed to include what else is stated. It plainly shows that
> >>>>> while they don't currently have any Cuban women in their database,
> >>>>> they are SOLICITING FOR THEM TO LIST.
> >>>> Yeah for 10 YEARS with NO luck, YOU fail to mention THAT. It's a
> >>>> "COME
> >>>>ON" Kunt. A "BAIT AND SWITCH."
> >>> So you claim. Offer the proof, unless another of your MANY
> >>> drunken pathological lies has been exposed
> >>The PROOF - MORON is their own admission. They have NO Cuba "brides"
> >>listed
> >>in their database and NEVER HAVE HAD.
> > Then explain why you were compelled to distort the context by
> > snipping where I included the bit about seeking Cubans?
>
> Relavency, dipshit? They haven't found even ONE in a decade.THE POINT is
> they DON'T HAVE ANY. But with yopu being a POLACK I don't expect you to be
> able to understand that!
Check your spelling Kennie.
Its RELEVANCY.
>
> > The site doesn't CURRENTLY host any names, but they are seeking them.
> > Here's the text again:
> > "Cuban Women
> > "We're sorry, but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in ourdatabase.
> > "Are you woman from Cuba? Seeking man for long term relationship
> > or marriage? Post your profile for free."
>
> Here, MORON, let me help you with that. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY and NEVER
> HAVE. Cubans have almost NO access to "SURF THE NET" and placing women's
> names would be a crime in Cuba. The women would likely get a visit from the
> police. But ALL OF THAT is "irrelevant" "immaterial" and BESIDE THE POINT,
> dumbass. They DON'T HAVE ANY. Your pal's point was that I *got* my wife
> there. What part of that don't you understand?
You did " get your wife" from Cuba Kennie. Supposedly Barbara came
from Cuba.
>
> > That none are listed is not a point of contention. I even accept
> > that they never have, though the site doesn't make this claim.
> > Once again you PROVE that you MUST distract from the truth. It's
> > not working.
>
> Look MORON, thery state simply they have NONE in their data base. It
> isn't just that none are listed. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY!
Seems to me that if "buying wives"was illegal, then having it openly
on a web site would be stupid.
>
> >>So Davey's FEEBLE attempt along with YOUR bullshit with your stupid claims
> >>that my wife *IS* in FACT a "mail
> >>order bride"
> > I've made no such claim.
>
> You both have repeatedly made the claim, BUT I can understand WHY you
> need to try to deny it now. That's one of your main gigs, to make outlandish
> claims, and when the falsity of your claims is proven, you deny ever making
> them. And MOORE is desperate enough to make HIS claims expire. Pretty
> cowardly.
You're one to talk f cowardice Kennie, considering your own cowardice
during Viet Nam
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/
>
>Loved the beemer photos, Kent!
Thanks.
>The boat was cute too.
Meh... I never saw boats as cute, but if you do, that's fine.
>Too bad about that boat registration the last time you tried this!
What was wrong about it?
Did you note that the picture shows part of the registration?
Note how the part that is shown has NONE of the same numbers as the
old one?
That sort of brings the claim you're deceptively trying to
present crashing down.
Once again you offer me the chance to prove that you are
psychologically UNABLE to be honest, except by accident or force. And
I thank you for it.
>
>One of your "fleet" no doubt.
Only if two boats equals a fleet. As far as I know, outside of
Kenneth Robert Pangborn's alcohol induced delusions, no one sees two
boats as a fleet.
>
>But I really thought the Chairkool PERFECT LIAR video
>was more telling about you.
Whereas I've not met any of the members, the odds that I was and
am the ex-boyfriend about who the song was written is so improbable
that it can be called impossible.
If you have something to support your implication that I dated
anyone in the group, feel free to offer it up for review. You are, of
course, free to admit, by YOUR standards, that your implication is
another of your MANY drug induced pathological lies by refusing to
offer any evidence.
>
>Even Photobucket decided one of your pictures
>was a terms of use violation.
When? Which one? Be specific, unless you'd rather admit another
of your drug induced lies has been exposed.
krp
"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:69f5610a-afc1-442d...@u41g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>> That you are a TIRELESS LIAR is proved, yet again, by the fact
> >>>>> that you failed to include what else is stated. It plainly shows
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> while they don't currently have any Cuban women in their database,
> >>>>> they are SOLICITING FOR THEM TO LIST.
> >>>> Yeah for 10 YEARS with NO luck, YOU fail to mention THAT. It's a
> >>>> "COME
> >>>>ON" Kunt. A "BAIT AND SWITCH."
> >>> So you claim. Offer the proof, unless another of your MANY
> >>> drunken pathological lies has been exposed
> >>The PROOF - MORON is their own admission. They have NO Cuba "brides"
> >>listed in their database and NEVER HAVE HAD.
> > Then explain why you were compelled to distort the context by
> > snipping where I included the bit about seeking Cubans?
> Relevency, dipshit? They haven't found even ONE in a decade.THE POINT is
> they DON'T HAVE ANY. But with yopu being a POLACK I don't expect you to be
> able to understand that!
MOE> Check your spelling Kennie. Its RELEVANCY.
Yell at Microshit. It came out of THEIR spellpecker!
> > The site doesn't CURRENTLY host any names, but they are seeking them.
> > Here's the text again:
> > "Cuban Women
> > "We're sorry, but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in ourdatabase.
> > "Are you woman from Cuba? Seeking man for long term relationship
> > or marriage? Post your profile for free."
> Here, MORON, let me help you with that. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY and NEVER
> HAVE. Cubans have almost NO access to "SURF THE NET" and placing women's
> names would be a crime in Cuba. The women would likely get a visit from
> the
> police. But ALL OF THAT is "irrelevant" "immaterial" and BESIDE THE POINT,
> dumbass. They DON'T HAVE ANY. Your pal's point was that I *got* my wife
> there. What part of that don't you understand?
MOE> You did " get your wife" from Cuba Kennie. Supposedly Barbara came
MOE> from Cuba.
Is that how YOU view things? Men "GET" women? I married my wife in Cuba
and she came here. You seem to have a VERY BITTER outlook on relationships.
Given your demeanor on Usenet I can fully appreciate WHY you'd have such a
negative view of pairbonding relationships and be such a total BITCH about
it.
Main Entry: 1bitch
Pronunciation: \'bich\
Function: noun
2 : a : a lewd or immoral woman b : a malicious, spiteful, or overbearing
woman -sometimes used as a generalized term of abuse
3 : a woman who is extremely difficult, objectionable, or unpleasant.
> > That none are listed is not a point of contention. I even accept
> > that they never have, though the site doesn't make this claim.
> > Once again you PROVE that you MUST distract from the truth. It's
> > not working.
>
> Look MORON, thery state simply they have NONE in their data base. It
> isn't just that none are listed. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY!
MOE> Seems to me that if "buying wives"was illegal, then having it openly
MOE> on a web site would be stupid.
That's WHY you are such a MORON, Maureen. You see, "BUYING" wives is NOT
illegal in the United States. I know this is difficult for your ONE live
brain cell to follow, but CUBA is NOT part of the United States and they
have their own laws. Have somebody with more patience than I have TRY to
explain it to you. Also as a RETARD, you might notice that the website MORRE
quoted does NOT have any MAIL ORDER BRIDES from Cuba. Another FACT too
complex for that solitary brain cell of yours to process. So what "SEEMS
TO: you is something very DUMB.
womanGoddess
> BITTER OLD HAG WOMEN SPEAK"
(( rolls eyes)) Childish, as usual for you,
>womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:69f5610a-afc1-442d...@u41g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > >>>>> That you are a TIRELESS LIAR is proved, yet again, by the fact
> > >>>>> that you failed to include what else is stated. It plainly shows
> > >>>>> that
> > >>>>> while they don't currently have any Cuban women in their database,
> > >>>>> they are SOLICITING FOR THEM TO LIST.
> > >>>> Yeah for 10 YEARS with NO luck, YOU fail to mention THAT. It's a
> > >>>> "COME
> > >>>>ON" Kunt. A "BAIT AND SWITCH."
> > >>> So you claim. Offer the proof, unless another of your MANY
> > >>> drunken pathological lies has been exposed
> > >>The PROOF - MORON is their own admission. They have NO Cuba "brides"
> > >>listed in their database and NEVER HAVE HAD.
> > > Then explain why you were compelled to distort the context by
> > > snipping where I included the bit about seeking Cubans?
> > Relevency, dipshit? They haven't found even ONE in a decade.THE POINT is
> > they DON'T HAVE ANY. But with yopu being a POLACK I don't expect you to be
> > able to understand that!
>
> MOE> Check your spelling Kennie. Its RELEVANCY.
>
> Yell at Microshit. It came out of THEIR spellpecker!
Yet another example of your obsession with dicks and your
homosexuality.
FYI Kennie, even Microsoft's spell checker can highlight your
mistakes. Bad excuse Kennie, and a weak one, but to be expected from
you as you don't admit your errors, ever.
>
> > > The site doesn't CURRENTLY host any names, but they are seeking them.
> > > Here's the text again:
> > > "Cuban Women
> > > "We're sorry, but we do not have Cuban brides profiles in ourdatabase.
> > > "Are you woman from Cuba? Seeking man for long term relationship
> > > or marriage? Post your profile for free."
> > Here, MORON, let me help you with that. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY and NEVER
> > HAVE. Cubans have almost NO access to "SURF THE NET" and placing women's
> > names would be a crime in Cuba. The women would likely get a visit from
> > the
> > police. But ALL OF THAT is "irrelevant" "immaterial" and BESIDE THE POINT,
> > dumbass. They DON'T HAVE ANY. Your pal's point was that I *got* my wife
> > there. What part of that don't you understand?
>
> MOE> You did " get your wife" from Cuba Kennie. Supposedly Barbara came
> MOE> from Cuba.
>
> Is that how YOU view things? Men "GET" women?
In your case, you being a male and not a man, yes you would "buy"a
wife. That would fit your pathetic life.
I highly doubt that a woman would be attracted to an obese male like
you unless she has another reason to be linked with you. Say, legal
residency. for example.
> I married my wife in Cuba
> and she came here. You seem to have a VERY BITTER outlook on relationships.
Nope. Just see what you and greg are like and wonder what woman would
want either of you two.
> Given your demeanor on Usenet I can fully appreciate WHY you'd have such a
> negative view of pairbonding relationships and be such a total BITCH about
> it.
My " demeanor'" as you call it, is only from what you wish to see,
not the real me. And here's a clue here Kennie. For MOST people
usenet is not their life. For you and greg, the real me is a woman who
isn't impressed by either of you and worse still, I am strong enough
to withstand the attacks you two do on me.
And, seeing as I HAVE a " significant other" AKA a MAN, well, that
pretty much torpedoes your claim about me.
You see Kennie, I know what a gentleman is. And neither you nor Greg
are gentlemen.
>
> Main Entry: 1bitch
> Pronunciation: \'bich\
> Function: noun
>
> 2 : a : a lewd or immoral woman b : a malicious, spiteful, or overbearing
> woman -sometimes used as a generalized term of abuse
> 3 : a woman who is extremely difficult, objectionable, or unpleasant.
(( Rolls eyes)) You can call me whatever you wish. It reflects upon
you, not upon me, dimwit.
BTW nice example of your misogyny. One of many, sad to say.
>
> > > That none are listed is not a point of contention. I even accept
> > > that they never have, though the site doesn't make this claim.
> > > Once again you PROVE that you MUST distract from the truth. It's
> > > not working.
>
> > Look MORON, thery state simply they have NONE in their data base. It
> > isn't just that none are listed. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY!
>
> MOE> Seems to me that if "buying wives"was illegal, then having it openly
> MOE> on a web site would be stupid.
>
> That's WHY you are such a MORON, Maureen.
For a supposed " moron" why is it that I exposed a number of your
many lies? Wouldn't that make YOU dumber than a moron?
((Laughing))
> You see, "BUYING" wives is NOT
> illegal in the United States.
Really? Funny. I've never seen ads of wives for sale.
> I know this is difficult for your ONE live
> brain cell to follow, but CUBA is NOT part of the United States and they
> have their own laws. Have somebody with more patience than I have TRY to
> explain it to you. Also as a RETARD, you might notice that the website MORRE
> quoted does NOT have any MAIL ORDER BRIDES from Cuba. Another FACT too
> complex for that solitary brain cell of yours to process. So what "SEEMS
> TO: you is something very DUMB.
(( Yawn)) Te me Kennie, would your current Cuban wife stay with you if
she had a choice?
I doubt it.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>> Here, MORON, let me help you with that. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY and NEVER
>> HAVE. Cubans have almost NO access to "SURF THE NET" and placing women's
>> names would be a crime in Cuba. The women would likely get a visit from
>> the
>> police. But ALL OF THAT is "irrelevant" "immaterial" and BESIDE THE POINT,
>> dumbass. They DON'T HAVE ANY. Your pal's point was that I *got* my wife
>> there. What part of that don't you understand?
>
>MOE> You did " get your wife" from Cuba Kennie. Supposedly Barbara came
>MOE> from Cuba.
>
> Is that how YOU view things? Men "GET" women?
I've been married for years, and I still don't "get" Lindsay.
OW! Who threw that? :-)
>I married my wife in Cuba
>and she came here. You seem to have a VERY BITTER outlook on relationships.
How do you get bitterness from Moe's posts?
>Given your demeanor on Usenet I can fully appreciate WHY you'd have such a
>negative view of pairbonding relationships and be such a total BITCH about
>it.
>
Of course, you see ALL women as bitches. Old news, actually.
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
<_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
krp
> MOE> You did " get your wife" from Cuba Kennie. Supposedly Barbara came
> MOE> from Cuba.
> Is that how YOU view things? Men "GET" women?
MOE> In your case, you being a male and not a man, yes you would "buy"a wife
MOE> That would fit your pathetic life.
Nice segue changing words from "GET" to "BUY."
MOE> I highly doubt that a woman would be attracted to an obese male like
MOE> you unless she has another reason to be linked with you. Say, legal
MOE> residency. for example.
Maureen the leakage of brain cells out that home in your skull has just
allowed the last live one to leak out. We've been over the "Cuban Adjustment
Act" a hundred times, the "wet foot dry foot" policy that Cubans cannot be
sent back. We've even gone over some time ago that my wife has her
"Permanent Resident Card" and more recently that she is awaiting the
swearing in ceremony to get the certificate as a U.S. Citizen. From the
moment she landed, Maureen, she didn't have to stay with me. Given her legal
background, she is very conversant on U.S. immigration laws. So while you
are playing your BITCH ROLE reality is different from your claims. It is
amusing to see how SHALLOW you are in your thinking that relationships are
based on appearances. I can understand why you feel thast with with your
problems with life long rejection.
> I married my wife in Cuba and she came here. You seem to have a VERY
> BITTER outlook on relationships.
MOE> Nope. Just see what you and greg are like and wonder what woman would
MOE> want either of you two.
I wouldn't expect a "BITCH" like You to understand. Thank God such a
churlish old hag like you would never present me the uncomfortable position
of having to tell you to "fukk-off" since you are so completely shallow.
> Given your demeanor on Usenet I can fully appreciate WHY you'd have such a
> negative view of pairbonding relationships and be such a total BITCH about
> it.
MOE> My " demeanor'" as you call it, is only from what you wish to see,
MOE> not the real me. And here's a clue here Kennie. For MOST people
MOE> usenet is not their life. For you and greg, the real me is a woman who
MOE> isn't impressed by either of you and worse still, I am strong enough
MOE> to withstand the attacks you two do on me.
Oh, Maureen, what we see IN your usenet behavior IS the "REAL" you.
Nobody would attack you but for your bitchy behavior, now just with me, not
just with Greg, but many others who have "crossed" you.
MOE> And, seeing as I HAVE a " significant other" AKA a MAN, well, that
MOE> pretty much torpedoes your claim about me.
That the one with the leash attached to his pierced testicles?
> Main Entry: 1bitch
> Pronunciation: \'bich\
> Function: noun
> 2 : a : a lewd or immoral woman b : a malicious, spiteful, or overbearing
> woman -sometimes used as a generalized term of abuse
> 3 : a woman who is extremely difficult, objectionable, or unpleasant.
MOE> (( Rolls eyes)) You can call me whatever you wish. It reflects upon
MOE> you, not upon me, dimwit.
Really Maureen? The dictionary definition fits YOU to a "T"....
MOE> BTW nice example of your misogyny. One of many, sad to say.
So the dictonary is misogynistic? The definition describes YOU. It is
accurate use of the word. Not demeaning to "women" at all, but describing
ONE WOMAN. I did not refer to women as "bitches" but YOU a "bitched" based
on your demeanor and behavior on the net. The SHOE FITS, Maureen.
> You see, "BUYING" wives is NOT
> illegal in the United States.
MOE> Really? Funny. I've never seen ads of wives for sale.
You see only what you want to see, and then only WHEN you want to see
it. What do you think all those on-line dating services are? They are LEGAL
in the United States. In CUBA ( the nation under discussion) a Cuman woman
putting herself on such a site would be violating Cuban law. I klnknow that
YOU cant understand the distinction.
> I know this is difficult for your ONE live
> brain cell to follow, but CUBA is NOT part of the United States and they
> have their own laws. Have somebody with more patience than I have TRY to
> explain it to you. Also as a RETARD, you might notice that the website
> MORRE
> quoted does NOT have any MAIL ORDER BRIDES from Cuba. Another FACT too
> complex for that solitary brain cell of yours to process. So what "SEEMS
> TO: you is something very DUMB.
MOE> (( Yawn)) Te me Kennie, would your current Cuban wife stay with you if
MOE> she had a choice? I doubt it.
"Te" you? My wife has all sorts of choices. She has a job. She has her
own car. She has permanent resident status and within a few months she will
have U.S. citizenship and a U.S. Passport. She has all sorts of choices and
HAS had for years. Once she left Cuba the world opened up to her. Your
problem is that she sees things in me you CANNOT possibly see. That has to
do with who and what you are, namely an extremely BITTER woman.
womanGoddess
>womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a4fe8337-a4d6-4d6b...@k23g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>
> > MOE> You did " get your wife" from Cuba Kennie. Supposedly Barbara came
> > MOE> from Cuba.
> > Is that how YOU view things? Men "GET" women?
>
> MOE> In your case, you being a male and not a man, yes you would "buy"a wife
> MOE> That would fit your pathetic life.
>
> Nice segue changing words from "GET" to "BUY."
You made the trip. It cost you money. May I presume her family didn't
fund your trip and meals and hotel costs?
>
> MOE> I highly doubt that a woman would be attracted to an obese male like
> MOE> you unless she has another reason to be linked with you. Say, legal
> MOE> residency. for example.
>
> Maureen the leakage of brain cells
As opposed to your anal leakage?
>out that home in your skull has just
> allowed the last live one to leak out. We've been over the "Cuban Adjustment
> Act" a hundred times, the "wet foot dry foot" policy that Cubans cannot be
> sent back.
Yes yes, your boarding pass from an airline that doesn't fly to Cuba,
your changing story of the German sexually assaulting a young girl in
a nearby motel room, Barbara being at three places at once...
IOW your usual set of lies.
>We've even gone over some time ago that my wife has her
> "Permanent Resident Card" and more recently that she is awaiting the
> swearing in ceremony to get the certificate as a U.S. Citizen.
Hmn, wonder how long your " marriage" to her will last after she gets
her citizenship...
Not very long, I warrant. There are better catches to find.
>From the
> moment she landed, Maureen, she didn't have to stay with me. Given her legal
> background, she is very conversant on U.S. immigration laws. So while you
> are playing your BITCH ROLE
Interesting note. Have I mentioned Barabra's weight like you have?
As for bitching, you do a lot of it yourself, oh Bloated Bowel-
obstructed Bitch Boi.
>reality is different from your claims. It is
> amusing to see how SHALLOW you are in your thinking that relationships are
> based on appearances.
I don't know what she looks like but I have seen what you look like.
You're quite repulsive so there must be some reason why she stays with
your disgusting carcass. And I highly doubt it's love.
> I can understand why you feel thast with with your
> problems with life long rejection.
Sorry to disappoint you, botulism brain, but I don't have " long term
rejection" problems. As you tend to project your own problems onto
others and considering that you have been married three times, I can
see how that rejection problem applies to you.
Particularly with your PE problem.
> > I married my wife in Cuba and she came here. You seem to have a VERY
> > BITTER outlook on relationships.
>
> MOE> Nope. Just see what you and greg are like and wonder what woman would
> MOE> want either of you two.
>
> I wouldn't expect a "BITCH" like You to understand.
I don't understand how a woman can live with a misogynist, a male who
blames women when they are abused by domestic violence, a male who
says women lie about being raped. A male whose own daughters despise
him.
But some women have such low self esteem they can live with assholes
like you.
I feel sorry for Barbara.
> Thank God such a
> churlish old hag like you would never present me the uncomfortable position
> of having to tell you to "fukk-off" since you are so completely shallow.
And yet you have "George Fox"-ed me a few times plus other assorted
cussings at me including your beloved "fukkking" word.
I can also note that its hilarious that someone as young as I am you
call an " old hag". And this from a male in his late sixties who is
OLDER than me.
As long as we're name calling, may I refer to you as a decrepit,
morbidly obese, slobbering drunk rolling around in his motorized chair
because he's too lazy to get off his ass and walk?
How about you being one of Dr. Frankenstein's mistakes? The gay
monster one.
And OC you literally are a bastard as your biological parents left
you up for adoption.
>
> > Given your demeanor on Usenet I can fully appreciate WHY you'd have such a
> > negative view of pairbonding relationships and be such a total BITCH about
> > it.
>
> MOE> My " demeanor'" as you call it, is only from what you wish to see,
> MOE> not the real me. And here's a clue here Kennie. For MOST people
> MOE> usenet is not their life. For you and greg, the real me is a woman who
> MOE> isn't impressed by either of you and worse still, I am strong enough
> MOE> to withstand the attacks you two do on me.
>
> Oh, Maureen, what we see IN your usenet behavior IS the "REAL" you.
Nope. It reflects SOME of me, true, but it is far from the " real"
COMPLETE me.
Your doggie greg tried conning more info about my real life from me,
and as usual for him he failed miserably.
Unlike you, I don't depend upon the internet, much less usenet, to
give me a purpose in life. For me this is an amusement, something to
play with. My existence does not depend upon daily rants or whatever
as you obviously need to do.
> Nobody would attack you but for your bitchy behavior, now just with me, not
> just with Greg, but many others who have "crossed" you.
(( Yawns)) I say what I mean, Kennie. You don't like it, tough
twonkies.
And I don't care who online likes me or not. One can disagree without
resorting to hatred. Unfortunately I can't say the same for you
Kennie.
At times I actually do pity you. What I see about you is so pathetic
and twisted I wonder how you can actually live around normal people
and not be shunned.
Then my pity for you vanishes when you do your ad homs.
I pity anyone who is related to you or married to you.
>
> MOE> And, seeing as I HAVE a " significant other" AKA a MAN, well, that
> MOE> pretty much torpedoes your claim about me.
>
> That the one with the leash attached to his pierced testicles?
Proof?
Now Kennie don't let your homoerotic sex fantasies show again!!!
>
> > Main Entry: 1bitch
> > Pronunciation: \'bich\
> > Function: noun
> > 2 : a : a lewd or immoral woman b : a malicious, spiteful, or overbearing
> > woman -sometimes used as a generalized term of abuse
> > 3 : a woman who is extremely difficult, objectionable, or unpleasant.
>
> MOE> (( Rolls eyes)) You can call me whatever you wish. It reflects upon
> MOE> you, not upon me, dimwit.
>
> Really Maureen? The dictionary definition fits YOU to a "T"....
According to you. And you are hardly an objective observer.
Particularly after I exposed a number of your lies.
Your virulent hatred of women is obvious.
>
> MOE> BTW nice example of your misogyny. One of many, sad to say.
>
> So the dictonary is misogynistic?
No, YOU are. And you are no gentleman.
> The definition describes YOU.
According to what you want to see about me.
You're still hurting that I showed how you lied, aren't you?
(( laughing))
> It is
> accurate use of the word. Not demeaning to "women" at all,\
Oh really? I'd like to see males called bitches when they are
straight. You know as well as I do that the word is a derrogatory
aimed at women.
Knock off the act Kennie. You aren't fooling anyone.
> but describing
> ONE WOMAN. I did not refer to women as "bitches"
Actually you HAVE referred to other women who have criticized you as
bitches.
> but YOU a "bitched" based
> on your demeanor and behavior on the net. The SHOE FITS, Maureen.
Better me a "bitch" than one of your daughters Kennie.
To you strong women are " bitches".
>
> > You see, "BUYING" wives is NOT
> > illegal in the United States.
>
> MOE> Really? Funny. I've never seen ads of wives for sale.
>
> You see only what you want to see, and then only WHEN you want to see
> it.
Projection noted.
Irony noted.
> What do you think all those on-line dating services are? They are LEGAL
> in the United States. In CUBA ( the nation under discussion) a Cuman
" Cuman"?
>woman
> putting herself on such a site would be violating Cuban law. I klnknow
" klnknow"? What language is that?
>that
> YOU cant understand the distinction.
I understand the English language. Too bad you don't use it.
>
> > I know this is difficult for your ONE live
> > brain cell to follow, but CUBA is NOT part of the United States and they
> > have their own laws. Have somebody with more patience than I have TRY to
> > explain it to you. Also as a RETARD, you might notice that the website
> > MORRE
> > quoted does NOT have any MAIL ORDER BRIDES from Cuba. Another FACT too
> > complex for that solitary brain cell of yours to process. So what "SEEMS
> > TO: you is something very DUMB.
>
> MOE> (( Yawn)) Te me Kennie, would your current Cuban wife stay with you if
> MOE> she had a choice? I doubt it.
>
> "Te" you?
Tell
> My wife has all sorts of choices. She has a job. She has her
> own car. She has permanent resident status and within a few months she will
> have U.S. citizenship and a U.S. Passport.
And hopefully she'll wake up and leave your fat ass for better
opportunities.
> She has all sorts of choices and
> HAS had for years. Once she left Cuba the world opened up to her. Your
> problem is that she sees things in me you CANNOT possibly see. That has to
> do with who and what you are, namely an extremely BITTER woman.
OTC I am not " bitter".
It seems to me you might be afraid that once Barbara gets her
citizenship papers she might leave you. Why else would you be listing
all her supposedly "independent" options? Why bother mentioning it at
all unless you are doing one of your mouthing off protestations/rants
to cover up something, as is your habit.
Good luck to Barbara. She's gonna need it if she keeps herself
enslaved to you.
Greegor
Arkansas with her Daddy Frank. She can't get a date with either
gender.
krp
> > MOE> You did " get your wife" from Cuba Kennie. Supposedly Barbara came
> > MOE> from Cuba.
> > Is that how YOU view things? Men "GET" women?
>
> MOE> In your case, you being a male and not a man, yes you would "buy"a
> wife
> MOE> That would fit your pathetic life.
> Nice segue changing words from "GET" to "BUY."
MOE> You made the trip. It cost you money. May I presume her family didn't
MOE> fund your trip and meals and hotel costs?
My first trip to Cuba, Maureen, she wasn't the only reason I went. Asl
do you claim that any time a man travels to see a women he eventually
marries that that fact means he is BUYING her? So what's the cutoff on the
distance? 100 miles? 200? A thousand? 10?
>out that home in your skull has just
> allowed the last live one to leak out. We've been over the "Cuban
> Adjustment
> Act" a hundred times, the "wet foot dry foot" policy that Cubans cannot be
> sent back.
MOE> Yes yes, your boarding pass from an airline that doesn't fly to Cuba,
MOE> IOW your usual set of lies.
Doesn't fly there? American airlines? Do you base that claim on your
VAST experience in the airline industry? The FAA? Hmm, the last little
dipshit that TRIED THAT peiece of insane bullshit was also shown to be full
of shit. Let's see IF Maureeen McAllister's CLAIMS hold up.
http://www.abc-charters.com/pages/flights.asp
Seems to ME they show dozens of flights to Cuba. And HOLY SHIT!!!! All of
them on AMERICAN AIRLINES. So mujch for your LIES, McAllister!
>We've even gone over some time ago that my wife has her
> "Permanent Resident Card" and more recently that she is awaiting the
> swearing in ceremony to get the certificate as a U.S. Citizen.
MOE> Hmn, wonder how long your " marriage" to her will last after she gets
MOE> her citizenship... Not very long, I warrant. There are better catches
to find.
Define not very long and your actual ability ($$$) to "warrant"your
claim. My wife doesn't seem to share YOUR view on "better catches" but then
your terminology DOES betray your views on male-female relationships. "Get"
"BUY" "CATCHES" all that kind of PROPERTY ideation.
>From the moment she landed, Maureen, she didn't have to stay with me. Given
>her legal
> background, she is very conversant on U.S. immigration laws. So while you
> are playing your BITCH ROLE
MOE> Interesting note. Have I mentioned Barabra's weight like you have?
I don't think I have been precise, BUT she has a GREAT figure probably
200 pounds lighter than you. She barely fills out a petite 6. And you ? A
plump 40 regular?
womanGoddess
> WORLD CHAMPION BULLSHITTER"womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
You were the one bragging today about how much of a "lover; You were
when you were young, even scrwping a Miss America.
And yes a really good looking guy or gal IS a catch to their SO. Mr
Welling sure is one for his wife.
YOWZAH!!!
>
> >From the moment she landed, Maureen, she didn't have to stay with me. Given
> >her legal
> > background, she is very conversant on U.S. immigration laws. So while you
> > are playing your BITCH ROLE
>
> MOE> Interesting note. Have I mentioned Barabra's weight like you have?
>
> I don't think I have been precise, BUT she has a GREAT figure probably
> 200 pounds lighter than you. She barely fills out a petite 6. And you ? A
> plump 40 regular?
Nope. Not even close Kenniepoop
Didn't you refer to Barbara in terms of an elephant once? BarBar or
some similar reference to an elephant.
womanGoddess
> when you were young, even screwing a Miss America.
>
> And yes a really good looking guy or gal IS a catch to their SO. Mr
> Welling sure is one for his wife.
>
> YOWZAH!!!
>
>
>
> > >From the moment she landed, Maureen, she didn't have to stay with me. Given
> > >her legal
> > > background, she is very conversant on U.S. immigration laws. So while you
> > > are playing your BITCH ROLE
>
> > MOE> Interesting note. Have I mentioned Barabra's weight like you have?
>
> > I don't think I have been precise, BUT she has a GREAT figure probably
> > 200 pounds lighter than you. She barely fills out a petite 6. And you ? A
> > plump 40 regular?
>
> Nope. Not even close Kenniepoop
>
> Didn't you refer to Barbara in terms of an elephant once? BarBar or
> some similar reference to an elephant.
>
> Moe
> Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
> " A vampire cop? REALLY?"
> "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
>
> Know your scum---http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Post corrected.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>MAUREEN MCALLISTER
>"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:a4fe8337-a4d6-4d6b...@k23g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>
>> MOE> You did " get your wife" from Cuba Kennie. Supposedly Barbara came
>> MOE> from Cuba.
>
>> Is that how YOU view things? Men "GET" women?
>
>MOE> In your case, you being a male and not a man, yes you would "buy"a wife
>MOE> That would fit your pathetic life.
>
> Nice segue changing words from "GET" to "BUY."
>
>MOE> I highly doubt that a woman would be attracted to an obese male like
>MOE> you unless she has another reason to be linked with you. Say, legal
>MOE> residency. for example.
>
> Maureen the leakage of brain cells out that home in your skull has just
>allowed the last live one to leak out. We've been over the "Cuban Adjustment
>Act" a hundred times, the "wet foot dry foot" policy that Cubans cannot be
>sent back.
Yet you claimed you got married in the U.S. so that she could
stay. Then to distract from the fact that you LIED, you tried to use
an Abbot and Costello movie. Granted, it was and is a funny film, but
it failed to prove your claim.
I'm sure you've become very accustom to failure.
>We've even gone over some time ago that my wife has her
>"Permanent Resident Card" and more recently that she is awaiting the
>swearing in ceremony to get the certificate as a U.S. Citizen. From the
>moment she landed, Maureen, she didn't have to stay with me.
But you likely lied to her and got her to think she would be
deported.
Under certain conditions she could be. I don't KNOW, but it's
possible a green card wedding may be grounds.
>Given her legal
>background, she is very conversant on U.S. immigration laws. So while you
>are playing your BITCH ROLE reality is different from your claims. It is
>amusing to see how SHALLOW you are in your thinking that relationships are
>based on appearances. I can understand why you feel thast with with your
>problems with life long rejection.
You're the one who posted the claim that you wanted Barbara
because of her looks.
Of course that was easily PROVED to be a lie, since you are so
determined to PROVE you're gay.
>
>> I married my wife in Cuba and she came here. You seem to have a VERY
>> BITTER outlook on relationships.
>
>MOE> Nope. Just see what you and greg are like and wonder what woman would
>MOE> want either of you two.
>
> I wouldn't expect a "BITCH" like You to understand.
All women are bitches in your misogynic mind.
>Thank God such a
>churlish old hag like you would never present me the uncomfortable position
>of having to tell you to "fukk-off" since you are so completely shallow.
Could you re-write that sentence? In English?
>
>> Given your demeanor on Usenet I can fully appreciate WHY you'd have such a
>> negative view of pairbonding relationships and be such a total BITCH about
>> it.
>
>MOE> My " demeanor'" as you call it, is only from what you wish to see,
>MOE> not the real me. And here's a clue here Kennie. For MOST people
>MOE> usenet is not their life. For you and greg, the real me is a woman who
>MOE> isn't impressed by either of you and worse still, I am strong enough
>MOE> to withstand the attacks you two do on me.
>
> Oh, Maureen, what we see IN your usenet behavior IS the "REAL" you.
>Nobody would attack you but for your bitchy behavior, now just with me, not
>just with Greg, but many others who have "crossed" you.
>
Such as?
Give us some names, please.
Yes, Moe and I have had our share of arguments on-line, but
you'll note that since we are mature, we got over them.
>MOE> And, seeing as I HAVE a " significant other" AKA a MAN, well, that
>MOE> pretty much torpedoes your claim about me.
>
> That the one with the leash attached to his pierced testicles?
Again you are compelled to PROVE you're gay.
No one cares, Ken. That you and whatever boy toy you conned into
showing you affection are into piercings is none of our business.
>
>> Main Entry: 1bitch
>> Pronunciation: \'bich\
>> Function: noun
>
>> 2 : a : a lewd or immoral woman b : a malicious, spiteful, or overbearing
>> woman -sometimes used as a generalized term of abuse
>> 3 : a woman who is extremely difficult, objectionable, or unpleasant.
>
>MOE> (( Rolls eyes)) You can call me whatever you wish. It reflects upon
>MOE> you, not upon me, dimwit.
>
> Really Maureen? The dictionary definition fits YOU to a "T"....
I've never seen Moe behave in such a way. And she's not held
back in any argument we've had.
Maybe you were and are so drunk you really don't understand?
>
>MOE> BTW nice example of your misogyny. One of many, sad to say.
>
> So the dictonary is misogynistic? The definition describes YOU.
I didn't see Moe's name anywhere in the definition.
>It is
>accurate use of the word. Not demeaning to "women" at all,
And you used scary quotes for what reason?
>but describing
>ONE WOMAN. I did not refer to women as "bitches"
You often do. In your misogynic state of mind, that's one of the
derogatory terms you use.
>but YOU a "bitched" based
Bitched? Past tense?
What is she now?
>on your demeanor and behavior on the net. The SHOE FITS, Maureen.
But you must LIE in order to make it appear, in your mind, that
the shoe fits.
>
>> You see, "BUYING" wives is NOT
>> illegal in the United States.
>
>MOE> Really? Funny. I've never seen ads of wives for sale.
>
> You see only what you want to see, and then only WHEN you want to see
>it. What do you think all those on-line dating services are? They are LEGAL
>in the United States.
Are you so drunk you think getting a membership to a dating site
equates to BUYING a wife?
What if the woman refuses? Does the man get a refund?
You should try posting when sober, Ken. You'll still be the idiot
you are, but you MIGHT be able to catch some of your bigger lies and
prevent yourself from posting them.
>In CUBA ( the nation under discussion) a Cuman woman
>putting herself on such a site would be violating Cuban law. I klnknow that
>YOU cant understand the distinction.
Yet there are such sites. I was able to expose your lie about
this long ago.
You even tried to LIE and claim the site was for Cubans seeking
to marry other Cubans.
>
>> I know this is difficult for your ONE live
>> brain cell to follow, but CUBA is NOT part of the United States and they
>> have their own laws. Have somebody with more patience than I have TRY to
>> explain it to you. Also as a RETARD, you might notice that the website
>> MORRE
>> quoted does NOT have any MAIL ORDER BRIDES from Cuba. Another FACT too
>> complex for that solitary brain cell of yours to process. So what "SEEMS
>> TO: you is something very DUMB.
>
>MOE> (( Yawn)) Te me Kennie, would your current Cuban wife stay with you if
>MOE> she had a choice? I doubt it.
>
> "Te" you? My wife has all sorts of choices. She has a job. She has her
>own car. She has permanent resident status and within a few months she will
>have U.S. citizenship and a U.S. Passport.
Good for her. Tell her I honestly wish her the best.
I hope she does so well in this country, Bill Gates calls her up
for financial advice.
>She has all sorts of choices and
>HAS had for years. Once she left Cuba the world opened up to her. Your
>problem is that she sees things in me you CANNOT possibly see. That has to
>do with who and what you are, namely an extremely BITTER woman.
>
Yet you must LIE to present such a claim.
Do you honestly think anyone, save for perhaps Greg, is buying
the lies you are selling?
"Kent is NOT Kent."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP CONsulting, acknowledging that
my name in real life is not Kent. Checking the MID will show he's
getting tired of explaining this to people.
Message-ID: <4b3b32c0$0$4973$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>WORLD CHAMPION BULLSHITTER
>"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:b57d455c-192c-45b4...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>
>> > MOE> You did " get your wife" from Cuba Kennie. Supposedly Barbara came
>> > MOE> from Cuba.
>> > Is that how YOU view things? Men "GET" women?
>>
>> MOE> In your case, you being a male and not a man, yes you would "buy"a
>> wife
>> MOE> That would fit your pathetic life.
>
>> Nice segue changing words from "GET" to "BUY."
>
>MOE> You made the trip. It cost you money. May I presume her family didn't
>MOE> fund your trip and meals and hotel costs?
>
> My first trip to Cuba, Maureen, she wasn't the only reason I went.
According to you, the first trip was for only for some sort of
family emergency for a friend. You claimed you met Barbara during
that trip.
Now you try to present that meeting her was one of the reasons you
went.
Pick a lie and stick with it.
Words you've used MANY times in the past. I can offer quotes and
MIDs to the posts where you've used them, if you like.
Of course you'll RUN from this, since by the very standards you
set in the post to which I am replying, you will need to admit you
think you OWN Barbara.
>
>>From the moment she landed, Maureen, she didn't have to stay with me. Given
>>her legal
>> background, she is very conversant on U.S. immigration laws. So while you
>> are playing your BITCH ROLE
>
>MOE> Interesting note. Have I mentioned Barabra's weight like you have?
>
> I don't think I have been precise, BUT she has a GREAT figure probably
>200 pounds lighter than you.
Do you really think Moe weighs in at around 500 pounds?
>She barely fills out a petite 6.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Please prove your claim. Feel free to censor her face, if you
wish. However, you will need to offer something else that will prove
it's her if you elect to censor her face.
Unless you're lying, you'll offer something in the way of proof.
> And you ? A
>plump 40 regular?
>
Did you see the picture I posted of Moe? I understand that when
drunk people often see double, and you've offered the proof you do so.
However, this doesn't mean you should add both images you see together
to get the total size of a person.
"Miranda was a STUPID WASTE OF TIME AND DID NOTHING!"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting and The A-Team.
Kent Wills
> Maureen McAllister is a 50 year old misfit who lives in Dardanelle,
> Arkansas with her Daddy Frank. She can't get a date with either
> gender.
Pretending your lie is true, what does it have to do with me? You're
replying to my post.
Greegor
Dardanelle,
G > Arkansas with her Daddy Frank. She can't get a date with either
G > gender.
KBW > Pretending your lie is true, what does
KBW > it have to do with me? You're
KBW > replying to my post.
Who said it was about you, Kent?
Re: Maureen McAllister the bullshitting wonder
22 krp Jan 1
23 womanGoddess Jan 1
24 womanGoddess Jan 1
25 Kent Wills Jan 1
Re: Maureen McAllister bitter old feminiazi
26 Kent Wills Jan 1
Re: Maureen McAllister's retardation
27 Kent Wills Jan 1
Maureen McAllister is a 50 year old misfit who lives in
Dardanelle, Arkansas with her Daddy Frank. She can't get a date with
either gender.
28 Greegor Jan 1
29 Kent Wills Jan
Kent Wills
wrote:
>G > Maureen McAllister is a 50 year old misfit who lives in
>Dardanelle,
>G > Arkansas with her Daddy Frank. �She can't get a date with either
>G > gender.
>
>KBW > Pretending your lie is true, what does
>KBW > it have to do with me? �You're
>KBW > replying to my post.
>
>Who said it was about you, Kent?
Whereas the headers show you were replying to me, you were. Do
TRY and keep up.
I understand it's your Fregoli, or complete INABILITY to be honest
about anything, acting up.
krp
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 23:07:50 -0800 (PST), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>G > Maureen McAllister is a 50 year old misfit who lives in
>>Dardanelle,
>>G > Arkansas with her Daddy Frank. She can't get a date with either
>>G > gender.
>>
>>KBW > Pretending your lie is true, what does
>>KBW > it have to do with me? You're
>>KBW > replying to my post.
>>
>>Who said it was about you, Kent?
>
> Whereas the headers show you were replying to me, you were. Do
> TRY and keep up.
> I understand it's your Fregoli, or complete INABILITY to be honest
> about anything, acting up.
You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt? That explains so much for
you, doesn't it? That way you never have to deal with somebody who LOVES to
play different characters through ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion." That way you can be a front man
for David Moore and accuse everyone who sees his little paw prints on posts
as suffering this disorder. Convenient for you.
Kent Wills
wrote:
Nether Moe nor I use remailers (prove either of us do, if we do).
Greg often replies to my posts while referring to me as someone
else. He will also reply to the posts of another while addressing me.
If he were doing some sort of piggy back reply, he would make
mention of it. He doesn't. Clearly he thinks I am all of these
people.
If it isn't Fregoli, then he's lying. Which do you think is the
one?
"Miranda was a STUPID WASTE OF TIME AND DID NOTHING!"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting and The A-Team.
Greegor
KRP > That explains so much for you, doesn't it?
KRP > That way you never have to deal with somebody
KRP > who LOVES to play different characters through
KRP > ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
KRP > their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion."
KRP > That way you can be a front man for David Moore
KRP > and accuse everyone who sees his little paw
KRP > prints on posts as suffering this disorder.
KRP > Convenient for you.
KBW > Nether Moe nor I use remailers
KBW > (prove either of us do, if we do).
Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
while he posts through one.
proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-
september.org!eternal-september.org!newsfeed.datemas.de!
news.datemas.de
KBW > Greg often replies to my posts while referring to
KBW > me as someone else.
You think that invisible newsgroup pointers
are more important than a stated NAME
at the top of a message? Retard.
KBW > He will also reply to the posts of another
KBW > while addressing me. If he were doing
KBW > some sort of piggy back reply, he would
KBW > make mention of it.
Attempts to define what others would do.
KBW > He doesn't. Clearly he thinks I am all
KBW > of these people.
Clearly you are Kent Bradley Wills, con artist.
( Hey Ken, Did you notice that Kent's favorite
song from ChairKool (Thai) is "PERFECT LIAR"? )
KBW > If it isn't Fregoli, then he's lying.
KBW > Which do you think is the one?
Kent the con artist sure does love to use
the FALSE DICHOTOMY fallacy.
http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/
Kent Bradley Wills AKA Compuelf DOB Jan 8 1969 Felony Garage Burglar
used teen as accomplice
Kent routinely says opponents are
A. Drunks
B. Druggies
C. Mentally Ill
D. Already conceded to Kent's argument
E. Question was already asked and answered ( ? )
It's as if Kent is an automation that is WAY too simple.
Kent's Appeal
IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
Cite as 696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Kent's Appeal
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Notice that KENT made claims re sale of 202 NW College apartment
building
That's geoparcel gp=802415452029
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
( Step by step instructions elsewhere with name Kent B Wills )
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
http://www.rogersgis.com/zoom/Residential_Development/indexfull.htm
http://www.arcountydata.com/county.asp?county=Benton
TWO of Kent Wills' usenet newsgroup identities:
Do It Yourself Instructions to look up Kent's record
Iowa Department of Corrections records for Kent
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Name Kent Bradley Wills [ As Collected Sept 13, 2009 ]
Offender Number 1155768
Sex M
Birth Date 01/08/1969
Age 40
Location
Offense
County Of Commitment
Commitment Date
Duration
TDD/SDD *
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date
* SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 12/16/2008
Probation C Felony Polk 12/16/2008
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003
IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
Cite as 696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Kent's Appeal
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk
County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective
assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.
Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender,
and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State
Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin
Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P.
Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch,
Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
WIGGINS, Justice.
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for
second-degree burglary contending that
an attached garage is a separate occupied
structure from that of the living quarters
of the residence. In this appeal, we must
determine whether trial counsel was
ineffective for (1) failing to move for
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to convict Wills
of second-degree burglary when he entered
an attached garage of a residence when no
persons were present in the garage, but
when persons were present in the living
quarters; and (2) failing to object to a
jury instruction based on this same
argument. Because we find there was no
legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury
instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not
ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called
the local police to report that a car
alarm sounded in the resident's
neighborhood. The city dispatched a police
officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only
to be stopped a couple of blocks later
by a person who informed the officer he
had witnessed someone running from the
area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the
car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the
person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody
running from the area. The minor answered
that he had not. While the officer and
another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood
arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people,
one of whom was heavy set with a blinking
light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She
observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's
attached garage through an unlocked service
door. She further observed a smaller
individual standing by a van parked in
the neighbor's driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave
even though they found a large amount of
coins, a flashlight, and an electronic
pocket organizer in his pockets. After
releasing the minor, the police officers
drove to the residence where the neighbor
observed the two suspicious people and
woke the owner. The owner, his wife,
and two daughters were in the residence
sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered
change and an electronic pocket organizer
were missing from the vehicles. The
owner's daughter reported a diamond ring
and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the
officers the minor was with Wills. After
the officers questioned the minor again,
he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the
burglary, the officers arrested him.
The State filed a trial information
charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the
information to include two additional
charges of burglary in the third degree
and using a juvenile to commit an
indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills
guilty of the crimes of burglary in the
second degree, burglary in the third
degree, and using a juvenile to commit
an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary
claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel.
II. Scope of Review.
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the
United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S.
Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93
(1984). Our review for a claim involving
violations of the Constitution is de novo.
State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
for postconviction relief actions. State
v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999).
However, we will address such claims on
direct appeal when the record is sufficient
to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer,
609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The
appellate record in the present case is
sufficient to allow us to address Wills'
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
on direct appeal.
In order for a defendant to succeed on a
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,
the defendant must prove: (1) counsel
failed to perform an essential duty and
(2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice
results when "there is a reasonable
probability that, but for the counsel's
unprofessional errors, the result of the
proceeding would have been different."
State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466
U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments
also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for
correction of errors at law. State v.
Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).
III. Analysis.
To find Wills guilty of burglary in the
second degree, the State had to prove
Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or
upon an occupied structure in which one
or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa
Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).
In this appeal, Wills first contends his
trial counsel was ineffective for failing
to move for a judgment of acquittal on
the basis there was insufficient evidence
to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons
present in or upon the occupied structure.
Wills concedes the garage was an occupied
structure, but argues the living quarters
and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore,
the jury could not have found there were
people present in the attached garage
at the time of the burglary.
The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:
[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances
to buildings and structures, land, water
or air vehicle, or similar place adapted
for overnight accommodation of persons,
or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity
therein, or for the storage or safekeeping
of anything of value. Such a structure
is an "occupied structure" whether or not
a person is actually present.
Id. § 702.12.
Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590
N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the
garage and the living quarters are separate
and independent occupied structures. In
Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors
were operated in the same structure.
590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant
committed two burglaries by entering each
business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up
demonstrate that the portions are
independent working units which constitute
'[a] combination of materials to form a
construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id.
Smothers is not at odds with the present
case because the living quarters and the
garage are not separate or independent
units of the residence.
Our review of the record reveals the garage
in question was a three-car attached garage
separated from the living quarters by a
door. The same roof covered the garage as
the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides.
It was structurally no different from any
other room in the residence.
The garage was a functional part of the
residence. On the night of the incident,
the door was unlocked. The owner of the
residence used two stalls in the garage to
park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As
such, the garage and the living quarters
are a single "structure" or "building"
functioning as an integral part of the
family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single
"occupied structure" under section 702.12.
See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr.
2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's
entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage
was attached to the house; therefore,
burglary of the garage was burglary of
an inhabited dwelling house); People v.
Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an
attached garage is a 'dwelling' because
it is part of the structure in which
the owner or occupant lives");
State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53
(N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary
of the [attached] garage was burglary of
the dwelling house because the garage was
a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d
760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding
"[s]ince the garage in the present case
was structurally part of a building
which was used for overnight lodging of
various persons, it must be considered
as part of a dwelling"); White v. State,
630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982)
(holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered
a habitation within the purview of the
penal code because the garage is a
structure appurtenant to and connected
to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.
2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993)
(holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute
included an attached garage).
Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to support
a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage there were no persons
present in or upon the occupied
structure, it would have been overruled
by the court because the owner and his
family were present in the residence at
the time of the burglary.
Wills also claims his counsel was
ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district
court on the same ground; that the
living quarters were a separate and
independent occupied structure from the
attached garage. The instruction as
given stated:
The State must prove all of the following
elements of Burglary in the Second
Degree as to Count I:
1. On or about the 12th day of August,
2003, the defendant or someone he aided
and abetted broke into or entered the
residence at . . . .
2. The residence at . . . was an occupied
structure as defined in Instruction No. 29.
3. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did not have permission or
authority to break into the residence at ...
4. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did so with the specific
intent to commit a theft therein.
5. During the incident persons were present
in or upon the occupied structure.
If the State has proved all of the elements,
the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not
guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and
you will then consider the charge of
Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree
explained in Instruction No. 21.
(Emphasis added.)
Wills' claim is without merit. As we have
discussed, the residence is the one and
only "occupied structure" under the facts
of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel
made this objection to the instruction,
it would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not
ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting
to the instruction because there was no
legal basis for the motion or objection.
See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234,
238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an
issue that has no merit).
IV. Disposition.
We affirm the judgment of the district
court because Wills' trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise
meritless issues.
AFFIRMED.
---------------------------------
Pay close attention to past owners of 202 NW College Ave.
Kent made affirmative claims about the property online.
Kent's folks sold it in 1994 while Kent lived there!
On 03/30/1999 Sweeney's filed on Kent for UNPAID RENT!
GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000
[ As Collected Sept 13, 2009 ]
Seller: WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R.
Buyer: THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST
04/26/1994 135,000 D/Deed 7010/188
-
Seller: SHELDAHL, ERIC A.
Buyer: WILLS, FRED
01/02/1990 130,500 D/Deed 6189/972
A Larger photo:
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Notice that name SWEENEY above?
Check this out!
Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on the SWEENEY case, 4th one down.
Under the "Filings" tab:
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT BRANDT GREGORY D 08/25/1999 09/01/1999 09/01/1999
Comments: $156.25 7.244% FROM 03/30/99
COMPUTER GENERATED NOTICE 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999
Comments: Notice of Proof of Claim
RETURN OF ORIGINAL NOTICE 04/21/1999 04/23/1999 04/23/1999
Comments: 4/10/99 KENT PERS
37.60
VERIFICATION OF ACCT HAS BEEN FILED 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE SWEENEY RENTALS 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
Comments: UNPAID RENT
Under the "Financial" Tab:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 98.60 31.00 67.60
FINE 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 238.46 0.00 238.46
-----------
$337.06 $31.00 $306.06
SUPPORT/ALIMONY N/A 0.00 N/A
----------------------------------------
Kent's 2000 Felony, first of TWO in Iowa
WILLS, KENT BRADLEY 05771 FECR145250 (POLK)
01/24/2000 Offense Date THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD) WITHDRAWN
01/24/2000 Offense Date THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
03/07/2000 DEFERRED JUDGMENT (At that time) Sentence: 365 Day(s)
03/07/2000 PROBATION INFORMAL; 8/07/01-TRNFRD TO FORMAL 365 Day(s)
03/07/2000 COMMUNITY SERVICE 50 Hour(s)
03/07/2000 REFERRED TO OTHER AGENCY 1ST TIME OFFENDER CLASS
08/07/2001 JAIL PROB HRG 11 Day(s)
08/07/2001 JAIL PROB HRG 11 Day(s) TIME SERVED
08/07/2001 PROBATION EXTENDED PROB HRG
04/16/2002 PROBATION EXTENDED TO 08/06/03
04/16/2002 IMPOSED 7 Day(s)
04/16/2002 OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS PROB HRG 6 Day(s)
04/16/2002 DETENTION PROB HRG 6 Day(s)
08/07/2003 PRIOR ORDERS CONTINUED PROB EXTENDED UNTIL 8-06-04
11/26/2003 REVOKED PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
11/26/2003 PLACEMENT HRG PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL120 Day(s)
11/26/2003 SUSPEND PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; TIME SERVED 106 Day(s)
11/26/2003 COMMUNITY CORR PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL 14 Day(s)
( When Kent's second Felony revoked the rest of his Probation.)
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on case FECR145250, 2nd one down.
Under the "[Criminal Charges/Disposition]" tab:
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT B WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR145250 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Defendant: WILLS, KENT BRADLEY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 01 Charge
Charge:
714.2(2) Description: THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD)
Offense Date: 01/24/2000 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0386367-01
Adjudication
Charge:
714.2(2) Description: THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD)
Adj.:
DNU-WITHDRAWN Adj.Date: 03/07/2000
Adj.Judge:
WILSON, ROBERT D
Comments: AMENDED TI FILED
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(2) Description: THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: WITHDRAWN
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 02 Charge
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Offense Date: 01/24/2000 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0386367-02
Adjudication
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Adj.:
DEFERRED Adj.Date: 03/07/2000
Adj.Judge:
WILSON, ROBERT D
Comments:
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: DEFERRED JUDGMENT
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 365 Day(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 365 Day(s)
Comment:
INFORMAL;8/07/01-TRNFRD TO FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 50 Hour(s)
Comment:
TO BE DETERMINED BY PROBATION
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: REFERRED TO OTHER AGENCY
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
1ST TIME OFFENDER CLASS
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2001 Sentence: JAIL
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: JACOBS, LOUISE M
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 11 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2001 Sentence: TIME SERVED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: JACOBS, LOUISE M
Facility Type:
J Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 11 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2001 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: JACOBS, LOUISE M
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROB HRG-4/16/02-PROBATION EXTENDED TO 08/06/03
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
04/16/2002 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: COPPOLA, CAROL L
Facility Type:
J Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 7 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
04/16/2002 Sentence: OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: COPPOLA, CAROL L
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 6 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
04/16/2002 Sentence: DETENTION
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: COPPOLA, CAROL L
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 6 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2003 Sentence: PRIOR ORDERS CONTINUED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: MCGHEE, ODELL
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROB EXTENDED UNTIL 8-06-04
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: REVOKED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: PLACEMENT
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 120 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: SUSPEND
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
J Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 106 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; TIME SERVED
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
J Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 14 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
---------------------------------------
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Count 01
08/12/2003 Offense Date BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
12/17/2003 Adj.Date: GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence 10 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Count 02
08/12/2003 Offense BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR VEHICLE
(AGMS)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 2 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION Duration: 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE Duration: 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
Count 03
08/12/2003 USING JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE(FELC)709A.6
(2)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Count 01 Charge
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Offense Date: 08/12/2003 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0668408-01
Adjudication
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Adj.:
DNU-GUILTY Adj.Date: 12/17/2003
Adj.Judge:
HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Comments: GUILTY
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 150 Hour(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
12/17/2003 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 02 Charge
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Offense Date: 08/12/2003 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0668408-02
Adjudication
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Adj.:
DNU-GUILTY Adj.Date: 12/17/2003
Adj.Judge:
HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Comments: GUILTY
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 150 Hour(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
12/17/2003 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 03 Charge
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Offense Date: 08/12/2003 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0668408-03
Adjudication
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Adj.:
DNU-GUILTY Adj.Date: 12/17/2003
Adj.Judge:
HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Comments: GUILTY
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 150 Hour(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
12/17/2003 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
-------------------------------------
Filings
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
ORDER OF DISCHARGE OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: FROM PROBATION
OTHER EVENT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
12/16/2008
Comments: FIELD DISCHARGE REPORT
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: REVOCATION HEARING SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED
DEFENDANT HAS NOT PAID IN FULL FINANCIAL
OBLIGATIONS
ORDER FOR PROBATION REVOCATION HEARING MOISAN CYNTHIA M 12/05/2008
12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: ON 1/7/09 AT 9:30AM RM204
PROBATION REVOCATION 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: REPORT OF VIOLATIONS FILED BY JAN HORNOCKER
FORMAL PROBATION HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/25/2006 01/26/2006
01/26/2006
Comments: EXTENDED TO 01/16/09 OR UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE MET
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006
OTHER ORDER HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/11/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006
Comments: DEFT'S PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09; DEFT TO
COMPLETE
CONDITIONS LISTED
OTHER EVENT 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005
Comments: THE SUPREME COURT RETURNED FILE, PSI, 4 TRANSCRIPTS,
AND 1 ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS
OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 06/09/2005 06/13/2005
06/13/2005
Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS
15.9 HOURS = $795.00
ATTORNEY - GRETA TRUMAN
OTHER EVENT CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005
09/15/2005
Comments: BILL OF COSTS
$27.50 TAXED AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND PAYABLE
TO
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
#04-0202
OTHER ORDER SUPREME COURT OF IOWA 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005
Comments: RE DEFT'S APPEAL CLAIMING INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL:
JUDGEMENT AFFIRMED
#04-0202
PROCEDENDO CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005
Comments: AFFIRMED
PROCEED W/DILIGENCE AS IF THERE HAD BEEN NO
APPEAL
#04-0202
COMMUNITY SERVICE 05/25/2004 05/27/2004 05/27/2004
Comments: 135 HRS COMPLETED 5/24/04
INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 05/11/2004 05/13/2004
05/13/2004
Comments: $1150
ELECTRONIC FILING
OTHER EVENT 04/26/2004 04/28/2004 04/28/2004
Comments: SUPREME COURT REC'D 1 FILE, 1 PSI ENVELOPE,
1 EXHIBIT(1 ENVELOPE DATED 1/21/04)
REC'D 4/20/04
OTHER ORDER NICKERSON DON 04/23/2004 04/27/2004 04/27/2004
Comments: THE BALANCE OF ATTNY FEE AND CC SHALL BE
CONVERTED TO 135 HRS COMM SERVICE
TO BE COMPLETED FROM FT DSM FACILITY
OR TRANSFER TO INTERSTATE COMPACT
COMMUNITY SERVICE 04/22/2004 04/23/2004 04/23/2004
Comments: 150 HRS COMPLETED
APRIL 8, 2004
OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004
Comments: RECD CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR DEFT
OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004
Comments: FILE AND PSI SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
ONE ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS FILED 1/21/04
SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
OTHER EVENT 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 04/19/2004
Comments: SUP CRT RECEIVED 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS
FILED 4/1/04 (VOL I & II)
SUP CRT 04-202
OTHER EVENT 04/06/2004 05/18/2004 05/18/2004
Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 4/1/04 SENT TO THE
SUPREME COURT
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004
04/05/2004
Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/16/03
VOLUME II
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004
04/05/2004
Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/15/03
VOLUME I
OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004
Comments: EXHIBITS RETURNED
OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004
Comments: ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS CHECKED OUT TO COURT
REPORTER R.M.
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004
Comments: MOTION IS GRANTED REGARDING REVIEW OF
PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTY FEES AND
THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS ORDERED TO MAKE
PAYMENT AS REQUESTED.
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/30/2004 03/31/2004
ENTERED IN ERROR
Comments: STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER SHALL MAKE PAYMENT AS
REQUESTED.
MOTION 03/18/2004 03/19/2004 03/19/2004
Comments: TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DOCKETING FILED BY
ASSISTANT APPELLATE DEFENDER
ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004
Comments: ON MOTION TO REVIEW ACTION RE:PAYMENT OF
COURT APPOINTED ATTY.
3/29/04 8:15AM RM209A
MOTION 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004
Comments: FOR REVIEW OF ACTION REGARDING PAYMENT
OF COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY FEES
FILED BY ATDF
OTHER EVENT 03/11/2004 03/11/2004 03/11/2004
Comments: SUPREME COURT RECVD 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF SENTENCING
ON 1/16/04 AND STATUS CONF ON 12/12/03 FILED
3/1/04
04-202
OTHER EVENT 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 03/09/2004
Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 3/1/04 SENT TO THE
SUPREME COURT
INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 03/09/2004 03/18/2004
03/18/2004
Comments: $1350.00 ELECTRONIC FILING
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004
03/03/2004 03/03/2004
Comments: OF STATUS CONFERENCE ON 12/12/2003
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004
03/03/2004 03/03/2004
Comments: OF SENTENCING ON 01/16/2004
OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 02/26/2004 02/27/2004
02/27/2004
Comments: COMBINED CERTIFICATE
OTHER EVENT 02/24/2004 02/24/2004 02/24/2004
Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES RECEIVED BY SUPREME COURT
2-10-04; SUPREME COURT NUMBER 04-202
ORDER APPOINTING OVROM ELIZA 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004
Comments: ORDER GRANTING K TAYLOR TO W/D
APPELLATE COUNSEL IS APPT
OTHER APPLICATION 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004
Comments: TO WITHDRAW
OTHER EVENT 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004
Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES AND CERTIFIED COPY OF NOTICE
OF APPEAL SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN A 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004
Comments: COURT APPOINTED BILLING
47 HOURS = $2500
OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004
ENTERED IN ERROR
Comments: COURT
NOTICE OF APPEAL TAYLOR KAREN A 02/06/2004 02/09/2004 02/09/2004
Comments: FILED BY ATDF
OTHER EVENT 01/23/2004 01/27/2004 01/27/2004
Comments: ADDENDUM TO PSI REPORT
EXHIBIT MAXEY REBECCA 01/21/2004 01/21/2004 01/21/2004
Comments: STATE'S EXHIBITS
1-$13.21; 2-$24.25 (IN VAULT); 3-LIGHT;
4&5-WRITTEN STATEMENT; 6,7,8-DIAGRAM
1 ENVELOPE & VAULT
OTHER EVENT 01/20/2004 01/26/2004 01/26/2004
Comments: VORP
VICTIM DOES NOT WANT TO VORP
NO RESTITUTION ISSUES AT THIS TIME
VICTIM DENNIS AND JAMIE WIEBEN
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 01/16/2004
01/20/2004 01/20/2004
Comments: $15.00
PRE SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT PSI 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
01/16/2004
ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
Comments: FOUND GUILTY BY JURY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL
PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS;
COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO
FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S
ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
01/16/2004
ENTERED IN ERROR
Comments: PLED GUILTY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL
PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS;
COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO
FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S
MITTIMUS TO STATE INSTITUTION WILLS KENT BRADLEY 01/16/2004
01/16/2004 01/16/2004
Comments: **FORT DES MOINES**
RETURN OF SERVICE - OTHER POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 12/23/2003
12/26/2003 12/26/2003
Comments: TRANSPORT COSTS $96.24
OTHER EVENT 12/22/2003 12/23/2003 12/23/2003
Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF ORDER TO EXCEED STATE FEE
LIMITATION RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE MAXEY REBECCA 12/17/2003 12/18/2003
12/18/2003
CRIMINAL VERDICT HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003
Comments: OF GUILTY TO BURGLARY 2ND, 3RD, AND USING A
JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE; DCS
WILL SUBMIT A PSI BY 1 WK PRIOR TO SENTENCING
DATE; PRESENTENCE CONF & SENTENCING 1-16-04
@ 8:30 AM IN RM 209A; BOND CONT
AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003
12/18/2003
Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH
JURY SELECTION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003
INSTRUCTIONS 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003
Comments: TO THE JURY AND STATEMENT OF THE CASE
OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003
Comments: JUV SEAN BILYEU SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE
CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF FOR THE DURATION
OF HIS REQUIRED TESTIMONY/PRESENCE IN THIS
MATTER. SEAN BILYEU SHALL REMAIN IN THE
CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF OR ANY OTHER
LOCATION (MEYER HALL) DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY
THE SHERIFF UNTIL THE POLK CO SHERIFF CAN
EXECUTE THE TIMELY TRANSPORT OF SEAN BILYEU
FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF TO THE ELDORA
TRAINING CENTER.
OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003
Comments: DEFT TO BE RETURNED FROM ELDORA-COTTAGE 5
BY JIM TROTTER, INVESTIGATOR/CTY ATTY'S
OFFICE; DEFT CAN BE PRESENT AT HIS TESTIMONY
ON 12-16-03
OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003
Comments: ATDF IS PERMITTED TO EXCEED GUIDELINE FOR
CT APPT ATTY IN THIS MATTER AND THAT THIS
ORDER SHALL INCLUED ALL FEES INCURRED AS OF
THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.
APPLICATION TO EXCEED FEES 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003
COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 12/12/2003
12/17/2003 12/17/2003
MOTION IN LIMINE TAYLOR KAREN 12/12/2003 12/15/2003 12/15/2003
ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 12/05/2003 12/08/2003 12/08/2003
Comments: STATUS CONF: 12/12/03 @ 10:00 AM RM 204
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/20/2003 12/09/2003 12/09/2003
Comments: 4=$0
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/18/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003
Comments: 3=$0
ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003
Comments: STATUS CONFERENCE
11/13/03 9AM RM 204
ALL PARTIES MUST BE PRESENT
ORDER SETTING TRIAL OVROM ELIZA 11/13/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003
Comments: 12/15/03 @ 9:00 AM RM 204
WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL TAYLOR KAREN 11/13/2003 11/14/2003
11/14/2003
Comments: LIMITED
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/10/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003
Comments: 1 = $0
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF DAVID DUVALL
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF BETH ANN SKOGEN
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF NEIL LEMKE
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF DENNIS WIEBEN
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF NATALIE BALUKOFF
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF SEAN BILYEU
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 10/31/2003 11/04/2003 11/04/2003
Comments: 6=$0
AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 10/31/2003 11/03/2003
11/03/2003
Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH
NOTICE WARD JAMES P 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003
Comments: OF ADDITIONAL WITNESSES
DNU - SUBPOENA PER DUCES TECUM 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003
Comments: 1 - $13.70
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE
AT STATE EXPENSE
OTHER APPLICATION 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE
AT STATE EXPENSE
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITION
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/07/2003 10/08/2003 10/08/2003
Comments: ORDER ENTERED 9/18/03 SETTING TRIAL FOR
11/19/03 WAS IS ERROR. TRIAL IS RESET FOR
11/12/03 @9:00 AM RM 204
OTHER EVENT 09/24/2003 09/26/2003 09/26/2003
Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF APP TO W/D
RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE OVROM ELIZA 09/18/2003 09/19/2003 09/19/2003
Comments: WAS HELD; TRIAL ON 11-19-03
ATDF TAYLOR
OTHER EVENT AMUNDSON LAURA K 08/26/2003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003
Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS
.4-$18.00
APPEARANCE TAYLOR KAREN 08/25/2003 08/26/2003 08/26/2003
Comments: FILED BY KAREN TAYLOR
WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL OVROM ELIZA 08/21/2003 08/22/2003 08/22/2003
Comments: OF ADULT PUBLIC DEF IS GRANTED
KAREN TAYLOR IS APPOINTED
ORDER OF ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003
Comments: Pretrial Conference 09/18/2003 01:30 PM DCC1
Trial 10/22/2003 09:00 AM DCC9
Bond is continued
TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003
Comments: FILED BY JAMES WARD
ORDER FOR ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003
08/14/2003
Comments: IN CUSTODY ON 8/21/03 AT 10:30AM JAILCOURT
OUT OF CUSTODY AT 8AM ROOM 204
PRELIM HAS NOT BEEN WAIVED SET FOR 8/22/03
DNU - HEARING FOR BOND REDUCTION MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003
08/14/2003
Comments: BOND $13000 C/S
APP FOR COUNSEL/FINANCIAL STATMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003
08/13/2003 08/13/2003
Comments: APPROVED
PD IS APPOINTED
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003
Comments: BURGLARY 2ND
ANPD 03-75354
HEARING FOR INITIAL APPEARANCE MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003 08/13/2003
08/13/2003
Comments: Preliminary Hearing 08/22/2003 08:00 AM DA03
Bond Review 08/14/2003 08:30 AM DA04
Bond set for 713.5 $13000 C/S
Total Bond $13000 C/S
Indexed PUBLIC DEFENDER-POLK COUNTYPIN-
PK1000375
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Orig Paid Due Summary
3501.70 3501.70 0.00 COSTS
0.00 0.00 0.00 FINE
125.00 125.00 0.00 SURCHARGE
0.00 0.00 0.00 RESTITUTION
27.50 27.50 0.00 OTHER
-------------------------------------
$3654.20 $3654.20 $0.00
WILLS, KENT B [ Collected Sept 13, 2009]
Age: 40
Rogers, AR
Ankeny, IA
Marshalltown, IA
Bartlett, IL
Villa Park, IL
And from another source: Hanover Park, IL
WILLS, FREDERICK ALFRED (Kent's Dad 65 )
WILLS, MICHAEL A (Kent's son ??)
WILLS, JANET RAE (Kent's Mom 62 )
HARTWIG,TIFFANY JEANNE (Wills) (Kent's sister )
From another source: Kelly M Wills Kent's wife ?? )
( Samantha T Wills, Kathleen M Wills, James Wills ? )
-----------------------------------
Consider the following:
If "our" Kent is NOT Kent Bradley Wills then
his ""Fake ID"" has worked well, so what's
the problem?
Consider Kent's OWN comments about:
A. regarding his sister (by name)
B. property in CORPORATION name (Wills Family Trust)
C. footage of "Wills" plaque avoiding first name
D. apt building at 202 NW College Ave Ankeny IA
E. past residence in various cities in IA
F. connection to Arkansas
G. that he set up/was assigned this ""Fake ID""
Does an actual Garage Burglary Felon have a
RIGHT to con people into thinking he ISN'T one?
Does a TWO time thieving Felon actually have
a right to conceal his record and a right
against having his record exposed?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/b9653f6758b592b8
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson, alt.law-enforcement, alt.usenet.kooks
From: Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com>
Local: Wed, Oct 15 2008 5:59 pm
> and running to Arkansas ain't gonna help you this time, Kent --
KBW > I've never run to Arkansas.
KBW > We have a house near Fort Smith, AR.
KBW > I'm confident your stalking has found
KBW > just where it is. You were able to
KBW > find my phone number from when I
KBW > lived in Chicago (you posted part
KBW > of it) back in 1988, so finding a
KBW > current address should have been
KBW > real easy for you.
2006 Assets Learning Conference Session III.8
Understanding the New Bankruptcy and Credit Laws:
Implications for the Field
Facilitated for the Assets Alliance by:
Janet Wills
Wills Resources
8250 Wills Court
Rogers, AR 72756
Phone & Fax Number: (479) 925-4001
E-mail: janetw...@yahoo.com
Ramona McKinney
Asset Builders Program Director
Southern Good Faith Fund
2304 West 29th Avenue
Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603
Phone Number: (870) 535-6233, ext. 15
E-mail: rmck...@southerngff.org
History of Bankruptcy
Roots of word traced to medieval Italy – “banco rotto” which means
broken bench
Early U. S. bankruptcy law was modification of British law
1800’s – First federal bankruptcy law signed by President John Adams
in 1800 2 more laws passed and repealed until the Bankruptcy Act of
1898
1900’s and Beyond
A bankruptcy environment that had as its focus helping debtors seek a
new start remained in place for most of 20th century.
By beginning of 21st century creditors successfully argued that this
current law and environment were too easy on debtors
BAPCPA
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005
was passed and went into effect October 19, 2005
Interruption in our presentation
There is a blank page in the back of your packet. As we are talking
today about bankruptcy and credit, please use it to jot down some of
your thoughts on how this new bankruptcy environment is going to
impact you and the people you serve.
Specifically write yourself a note or two about at least one
bankruptcy proceeding you know about personally. Then in 20 words or
less state what you think the contributing cause was for that person’s
financial problems.
We will want to hear your thoughts later.
Types of Bankruptcy
Chapter 7
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 7
For personal bankruptcy
Often referred to is liquidation bankruptcy
Debtors turn over nonessential assets to bankruptcy trustee, who then
sells it off and distributes proceeds to creditors eliminating debt
completely
This type of bankruptcy was most affected by the BAOCPA
Chapter 11
For corporations that want to reorganize their finances and remain in
business
Features a debt repayment plan
Chapter 12
For family farmers and fishermen
Features payment plan and debt restructuring
Chapter 13
For individuals
Features debt repayment plan
More individuals who previously would have filed under Chapter 7 will
be forced into Chapter 13
Changes with the BAPCPA
Means test
Required Credit Counseling
Required Debtor Education
Means Test
To qualify for Chapter 7 “liquidation bankruptcy” individual must pass
means test
Income must be below state’s median income
Or if it is above, debtor is subject to means test
Monthly income less allowed expenses
If after all these subtractions the total monthly disposable income is
less than $100 the debtor has passed the Means Test
Means Test cont.
If disposable income is more than $166.67 Means test is flunked and
debtor is not eligible for Chapter 7, must go to Chapter 13
If disposable income is between $100 and $166.67 then calculations are
figured to see if what is left over is enough to pay off more than 25%
of unsecured debt over 5 years.
In other words – the means test is not easy.
Required Credit Counseling
Debtors filing for Chapter 7 must complete required credit counseling
& debtors must pay for it.* Credit Counseling must be provided by a
qualifying 501(c)3 organization that has been approved by Bankruptcy
Trustees.
*fee can be waived
Debtor Education
2 hours required
Required topics
Budget Development
Setting short-term & long-term financial goals as well as developing
skills to assist in achieving these goals
Calculating gross monthly income & net monthly income
Identifying & classifying monthly expenses as fixed, variable, or
periodic
Debtor Education
Required topics cont
Money Management
Keeping adequate financial records
Developing decision-making skills required to distinguish between
wants and needs and to comparison shop for goods & services
Maintaining appropriate levels of insurance coverage, taking into
account the types and costs of insurance
Saving for emergences, for periodic payments, and for financial goals
Debtor education
required topics cont.
Wise Use of Credit
Types sources, and costs of credit & loans
Identifying debt warning signs
Appropriate use of credit & alternatives to credit use
Checking a credit rating
Debtor Education
required topics cont.
Consumer information
Public and non-profit resources for consumer assistance
Applicable consumer protection laws and regulations, such as those
governing correction of a credit record and protection against
consumer fraud
Approved credit counseling and debtor education can be provided
In person
Internet
Telephone
(can be approved for a combination of internet/telephone. That is the
approval we have)
www.usdoj.gov/ust/
The U. S. Trustees home page
A Huge wealth of information
www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/ccde/cc_approved.htm#AL
Web site (part of the trustee web site) for list of approved credit
counselors and debtor education providers
Click on state
Click on your judicial district
Bankruptcy and the Future
At first it’s a relief – you file for bankruptcy, the creditors stop
calling and harassing you, and the juggling act ends.
Many people who file bankruptcy ask, “Now what can I expect?”
Let’s begin looking at “what’s next” by completing the quiz.
Bankruptcy will expire from your credit report after 10 years.
Some credit reporting agencies may remove Chapter 13 after 7 years.
Bankruptcy is for life – if you apply for insurance, credit, or a job
you can be asked if you have ever filed for bankruptcy. There is no
time limit even if it is very old.
Bankruptcy will stay with me forever: True.
2. The accounts included in my bankruptcy will be removed from my
credit report upon discharge: False.
Accounts included in bankruptcy expire independently from bankruptcy.
These accounts will be marked “Included in BK” on the credit report.
They will remain up to 7 years after filing.
After discharge the balance must be reported as “0.”
I will never get credit again: False.
You can expect receive many offers of credit.
Many of these may be from unscrupulous creditors with activation fees
and/or membership fees.
There are “debtor-friendly” agencies that specialize in credit repair
loans.
Do not be too eager to get credit again – know the terms and
conditions of the credit.
I will not be able to by a home for 10 years: False.
There are some lenders who prefer to deal with consumers with good
credit and will not do business for the 10 years it remains.
It is not a quick fix, it may take those in Chapter 13 three to five
years to complete their payment plan.
With strides to rebuild credit and no new negative “marks,” you may be
able to receive a conventional mortgage within one to two years.
Even after bankruptcy I may still have some of my existing debt:
True.
Even with Chapter 7 not all debt will be discharged, it depends on the
type of debts that are owed.
Certain debts that cannot be discharged include: most taxes, child
support, most student loans, court fines and criminal restitution, and
personal injury.
Debts incurred after filing for bankruptcy will not be included.
I will lose all my property if I file for bankruptcy: False.
With Chapter 13, which is like a payment plan, you may be allowed to
keep property.
Chapter 7 involves the sale of all assets that are not exempt.
Exemptions differ from state to state but typically allow: equity in
home, insurance, retirement plans, personal property, car, public
benefits, and/or tools used on job.
Filing for bankruptcy will lower my credit score: True.
The drop in the credit score will depend on the type of debt and
payment history prior to filing.
Credit score is calculated using a complicated algorithm that takes
into account hundreds of factors and values.
It is very difficult to predict how the credit score will be affected
but bankruptcy is one of the most negative factors included in the
report.
I cannot file for bankruptcy for 8 years after discharge: True.
This is only true for Chapter 7.
Chapter 13 waiting period is shorter and can be as little as two
years.
After bankruptcy all my debts will be free and clear and I will have
peace of mind: False.
As stated in #5 all debts will not be discharged.
Bankruptcy is listed in the top five life-altering negative events
that one can go through.
Bankruptcy is life-altering and leaves deep wounds both to the psyche
and the credit report.
After bankruptcy I will need to take steps to protect myself from
another bankruptcy: True.
Even if the bankruptcy was through no fault of your own it will be a
good time to examine what led to bankruptcy to begin to prepare for
unforeseen events.
Take a critical look at spending and saving habits.
Implement strategies to control spending, develop a budget, and start
a savings plan.
Let’s Talk About It
Implications to the IDA field
The “typical” person seeking bankruptcy
Contributing causes
Kent Wills
wrote:
>KRP > You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt?
>KRP > That explains so much for you, doesn't it?
>KRP >�That way you never have to deal with somebody
>KRP > who LOVES to play different characters through
>KRP > ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
>KRP > their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion."
>KRP > That way you can be a front man for David Moore
>KRP > and accuse everyone who sees his little paw
>KRP > prints on posts as suffering this disorder.
>KRP > Convenient for you.
>
>KBW > Nether Moe nor I use remailers
>KBW > (prove either of us do, if we do).
>
>Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
>while he posts through one.
>
When did datemas.de, a news server, become an anonymous remailer?
Please be specific and prepared to have any and all lies exposed.
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/f3725fed67eb3cb9?dmode=source
>
>proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-
>september.org!eternal-september.org!newsfeed.datemas.de!
>news.datemas.de
You shouldn't include the PROOF that you're lying in the post on
which the lie appears.
>
>KBW > Greg often replies to my posts while referring to
>KBW > me as someone else.
>
>You think that invisible newsgroup pointers
>are more important than a stated NAME
>at the top of a message? Retard.
They aren't invisible. If they were, you wouldn't have been able
to PROVE your lied when you claimed I use an anonymous remailer.
Further, they wouldn't appear in the link you post above.
I do enjoy when you offer the PROOF that you are a liar. Yes, I
could easily prove it myself, having done so many, many times, but
it's so much better when you bring forth the proof.
Of course, you really are as mentally retarded as you present, so
you likely thought that proving datemas.de is a new server would
somehow prove your LIE that it's an anonymous remailer.
>
>KBW >�He will also reply to the posts of another
>KBW > while addressing me. If he were doing
>KBW > some sort of piggy back reply, he would
>KBW > make mention of it.
>
>Attempts to define what others would do.
That's what any mentally stable person would do. That this is
lost on you does not come as a surprise.
>
>KBW >�He doesn't. �Clearly he thinks I am all
>KBW > of these people.
>
>Clearly you are Kent Bradley Wills, con artist.
And you think Kent Bradley Wills is several different people from
all over the U.S. (and one place in Canada) all at the same time.
Further, you think several people with the real life name Kent Wills
are all the same person.
Yet you bitch and cry when anyone holds you to those same
standards.
>
>( Hey Ken, Did you notice that Kent's favorite
>song from ChairKool (Thai) is "PERFECT LIAR"? )
>
Why do you lie? What is your SPECIFIC motivation for the lie you
present?
>KBW > If it isn't Fregoli, then he's lying.
>KBW > Which do you think is the one?
>
>Kent the con artist sure does love to use
>the FALSE DICHOTOMY fallacy.
>
You may call your being caught by any term or terms you wish.
>
>
>
>http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/
>
>
>
Could you explain what my photobucket page has to do with
anything? I don't have a problem with anyone linking to it, but I'm
curious as to what you hope to prove.
Maybe you want to prove you LIED when you claimed a picture shown
there violates the host's policies and terms of service?
[snip of Greg's posting that which he openly admits isn't about me]
--a true story
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
Greegor
KRP > That explains so much for you, doesn't it?
KRP > That way you never have to deal with somebody
KRP > who LOVES to play different characters through
KRP > ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
KRP > their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion."
KRP > That way you can be a front man for David Moore
KRP > and accuse everyone who sees his little paw
KRP > prints on posts as suffering this disorder.
KRP > Convenient for you.
KBW > Nether Moe nor I use remailers
KBW > (prove either of us do, if we do).
G > Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
G > while he posts through one.
KBW > When did datemas.de, a news server,
KBW > become an anonymous remailer?
KBW > Please be specific and prepared to
KBW > have any and all lies exposed.
What about the rest?
proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-
september.org!eternal-september.org!newsfeed.datemas.de!
KBW > You shouldn't include the PROOF that
KBW > you're lying in the post on which the lie appears.
What's you IP Address, Kent?
[ The rest is just the usual Kent Wills circular gibberish. ]
Kent Wills
wrote:
>KBW > Nether Moe nor I use remailers
>KBW > (prove either of us do, if we do).
>
>G > Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
>G > while he posts through one.
>
>KBW > When did datemas.de, a news server,
>KBW > become an anonymous remailer?
>KBW > Please be specific and prepared to
>KBW > have any and all lies exposed.
>
>What about the rest?
>
>proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-
>september.org!eternal-september.org!newsfeed.datemas.de!
Please prove any of the news servers listed would fit the
category of anonymous remailer, or admit you've been caught in yet
another lie.
You made the claim that I use an anonymous remailer, then, being
the uneducated fool you are, set about proving yourself a liar.
>
>KBW > You shouldn't include the PROOF that
>KBW > you're lying in the post on which the lie appears.
>
>What's you IP Address, Kent?
I actually don't know. I would need to look it up. Of course,
if you want stalking fodder, you'll have to get it from another
source.
I've mentioned that I'm not going to assist you with your
psychological NEED to stalk me. Since I've made this very clear, I
have to wonder just why you continue to seek my assistance. Would you
explain why you want me to help you, please?
>
>[ The rest is just the usual Kent Wills circular gibberish. ]
Thank you for admitting, by your own standards, that everything I
presented was and is 100% accurate.
Greegor
KBW > I actually don't know. I would need to look it
KBW > up. Of course, if you want stalking fodder,
KBW > you'll have to get it from another source.
Isn't the purpose of anonymous remailers
to conceal your IP address?
Kent Wills
wrote:
[Context restored at no additional cost]
>>>proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-
>>>september.org!eternal-september.org!newsfeed.datemas.de!
>>
>> Please prove any of the news servers listed would fit the
>>category of anonymous remailer, or admit you've been caught in yet
>>another lie.
>> You made the claim that I use an anonymous remailer, then, being
>>the uneducated fool you are, set about proving yourself a liar.
>>
Thank you, Greg, for admitting, by your own standards, that you
have been caught in another lie.
>>
>>KBW > You shouldn't include the PROOF that
>>KBW > you're lying in the post on which the lie appears.
Thank you, Greg, for admitting, by your own standards, that your
post was, and is, a lie.
>G >What's you IP Address, Kent?
>
>KBW > I actually don't know. =A0I would need to look it
>KBW > up. =A0Of course, if you want stalking fodder,
>KBW > you'll have to get it from another source.
>
>> I've mentioned that I'm not going to assist you with your
>>psychological NEED to stalk me. Since I've made this very clear, I
>>have to wonder just why you continue to seek my assistance. Would you
>>explain why you want me to help you, please?
>
>Isn't the purpose of anonymous remailers
>to conceal your IP address?
I don't know the purpose of them. Whereas you've claimed the
"=A0" characters that are added to your posts is the result of your
use of such, you would be in a far better possition to know than I.
Also, thank you, Greg, for admitting, by your standards, that you
are seeking stalking information about me and that you are so
incompetent that you NEED your target to assist you.
>
>http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/
krp
>>You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt? That explains so much
>>for
>>you, doesn't it? That way you never have to deal with somebody who LOVES
>>to
>>play different characters through ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
>>their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion." That way you can be a front
>>man
>>for David Moore and accuse everyone who sees his little paw prints on
>>posts
>>as suffering this disorder. Convenient for you.
> Nether Moe nor I use remailers (prove either of us do, if we do).
AH, but Wills, the point is that you DENY you are you. Same deal just
easier to disprove. Your buddy Moore id doign his USUAL job of "WHINING
LIKIE A BABY" to my ISP demanding I be removed. The little pussy does that
every time he gets outed for his shit. The DDOS attacks against my host
systems continues. Each time I mention them HERE they step up. Now I am sure
it could be a COINKYDINK. I wonder how many people will believe it though? I
bet even YOU don't really believe it is all coincidence. Maybe you do, sfter
all, YOU are a polack.
krp
KRP > You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt?
KRP > That explains so much for you, doesn't it?
KRP > That way you never have to deal with somebody
KRP > who LOVES to play different characters through
KRP > ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
KRP > their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion."
KRP > That way you can be a front man for David Moore
KRP > and accuse everyone who sees his little paw
KRP > prints on posts as suffering this disorder.
KRP > Convenient for you.
KBW > Nether Moe nor I use remailers
KBW > (prove either of us do, if we do).
GH> Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
GH> while he posts through one.
I forgot about that one. datemas.de
Greegor
KRP > you are you. Same deal just easier to disprove.
Datamas,de and eternal-september concealing his IP address.
KRP > Your buddy Moore id doign his USUAL job
KRP > of "WHINING LIKIE A BABY" to my ISP
KRP > demanding I be removed. The little pussy
KRP > does that every time he gets outed for his
KRP > shit. The DDOS attacks against my host
KRP > systems continues. Each time I mention
KRP > them HERE they step up. Now I am sure
KRP > it could be a COINKYDINK. I wonder how
KRP > many people will believe it though? I bet
KRP > even YOU don't really believe it is all
KRP > coincidence. Maybe you do, sfter all,
KRP > YOU are a polack.
I bet Dan, Kent and Moe all know exactly what Davey is up to.
David Daniel Moore AKA David Ulanowski Random
DOB 9/26/70 Birth Mother Judith Ulanowski
http://www.malevolentmoms.info/
Domain ID:D17039630-LRMS
Domain Name:MALEVOLENTMOMS.INFO
Created On:28-Mar-2007 23:12:21 UTC
Last Updated On:28-May-2007 20:36:43 UTC
Expiration Date:28-Mar-2008 23:12:21 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Go Daddy Software Inc (R171-LRMS)
Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:GODA-029624659
Registrant Name:dave moore
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street1:po box 702
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:portage
Registrant State/Province:Indiana
Registrant Postal Code:46368
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.12624786077
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:malevolentm...@gmail.com
Admin ID:GODA-229624659
Admin Name:dave moore
Admin Organization:
Admin Street1:po box 702
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:portage
Admin State/Province:Indiana
Admin Postal Code:46368
Admin Country:US
Admin Phone:+1.6306609177
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email:malevolentm...@gmail.com
Billing ID:GODA-329624659
Billing Name:dave moore
Billing Organization:
Billing Street1:po box 702
Billing Street2:
Billing Street3:
Billing City:portage
Billing State/Province:Indiana
Billing Postal Code:46368
Billing Country:US
Billing Phone:+1.6306609177
Billing Phone Ext.:
Billing FAX:
Billing FAX Ext.:
Billing Email:malevolentm...@gmail.com
Tech ID:GODA-129624659
Tech Name:dave moore
Tech Organization:
Tech Street1:po box 702
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:portage
Tech State/Province:Indiana
Tech Postal Code:46368
Tech Country:US
Tech Phone:+1.6306609177
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email:malevolentm...@gmail.com
Name Server:NS39.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server:NS40.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
=============================================
Moore Linda webpage
NOTE LOCATION OF REGISTRATION "PORTAGE INDIANA" Note name DAVE
MOORE ;
Linda Michelle Boss of Centralia, Missouri is a 32-year old mother of
four.
In 2006, she began having an extramarital affair with a coworker at
the
SONIC restaurant where she worked, a teenaged boy named Brice Wayne
Windsor.
She then attempted to eradicate her children's father, who has always
been
an involved parent, from their lives, through tactics such as
threats,
attempted baseless restraining orders interference with phone
communication,
violation of parenting time agreements and brainwashing her children
with
lies regarding their father.
In April 2006, Boss attempted to obtain a restraining order which
would have
prevented any contact between the father and the four children. The
grounds
for her request were, in part, (1) that he called police when she and
her
friends threatened him, (2) that he told his daughter that he might
come to
watch her at her school track meet. Understandably, the court denied
her
request for an order of protection.
Boss and Windsor have repeatedly interfered with the father's attempts
to
communicate with his children. Often, one or the other would pick up
the
phone when he called, shout an obscenity or a threat, then hang up the
phone
before he could ask to speak with his children. On one such occasion,
Brice
Windsor answered the phone and stated "When I get done with your wife,
I'm
going to [rape] your daughters" while Boss laughed in the background.
The
daughters were 13 and 12 years of age at the time of this incident.
Postal mail which is sent to the children never seems to make it to
them.
Most notably, after Boss had the telephone service disconnected, a
prepaid
phone card was mailed to the daughter but never reached her.
On multiple occasions, Boss agreed to the father having specific dates
and
times of parenting time with the children, then violated the
agreements and
hid the children from the father when he traveled to pick them up (a
seven-hour drive one way.) As a result of her lack of moral character,
Boss
also became pregnant with an illegitimate child while she was still
married
to her children's father. Although it was physically and medically
impossible for him to have fathered the child, Boss fraudulently
reported
the matter to Social Services and is attempting to obtain child
support for
Jade Elizabeth Windsor, due to Windsor's apparent inability to support
his
own (alleged) child.
Due to her financial irresponsibility, Boss' home was foreclosed on.
The
four children have had to be uprooted from their home for the fourth
time in
as many years, and she has now packed them into a tiny trailer with
Brice
Windsor and his family.
Among Boss' other abusive actions
. Her ten-year old son stated that he was hungry. Boss told him "fend
for
yourself." The child then tried to cook dinner for himself and
severely
burned himself. The mother did not seek treatment.
. Left her daughter home alone with a broken leg so that she could
meet
Brice Windsor for her affair.
. Left six-year old child home without supervision while having an
extramarital affair.
. Inability to keep a job for any length of time, due to her inability
to
get along with anyone.
-----------------
Hometown
Centralia, Missouri
Birthdate October 12, 1974
Occupation
SONIC carhop, gas station clerk
Claims to shame
Repeated violations of parenting agreements;
extramarital affair with teenaged boy in front of children;
parental alienation/brainwashing of children;
numerous instances of child abuse and neglect;
became pregnant from her affair while still married
Audio
Linda Boss brags about bad legal advice
=======================================================
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 12:53:01 -0500
From: "Joseph M. O'Connor" <jmo...@geocities.com>
Reply-To: jmo...@geocities.com
To: PangK <Pa...@aol.com>
Subject: Re: I'm dying to know. References:
<89a8b040.34fea...@aol.com>
[ ... ]
DDM> Oh, and btw....you might want to give a message to your friend
oconner.
DDM> He's been gloating around the newsgroups about having gotten me
fired
DDM> from my job....I should clarify the situation a little. I'm a
DDM> consultant....meaning that I get sent to various companies to do
work
DDM> for a prescribed amount of time. In this case it was Saralee. My
DDM> contract was to be finished at the end of January....jmoc's
antics
DDM> simply caused it to end about eight days early. I was never a
Saralee
DDM> employee and therefore they CANNOT fire me. I am an employee of
a
DDM> consulting agency, which FWIW had me working again at another
company
DDM> within two days. I only bring this up because I hear you and
friends
DDM> rubbing it in about my "unemployment", and think it's kinda odd.
=======================================================
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2007/06/10/news/porter_county/...
Sunday, June 10, 2007 | No comments posted.
Sex offender accused of not registering
PORTAGE | A sex offender who police say was evicted from his Portage
home on
May 22 and then failed to notify police of a new address within 72
hours as
is required by law has been arrested on a felony charge of failure to
register as a sex offender.
Battery | Todd Yates, 28, 2970 Monnier St., Portage; ****David Moore,
36,
Calumet City*****; Paul Dimiceli, 30, Dyer; Johnathan Brandon, 18,
2104
Lapine St., Portage; Nicholas Mandich, 23, 309 Kraus Drive,
Valparaiso;
Derek Nowacki, 27, 1018 S. 22nd St., Chesterton; Jeffery Knight, 40,
717
George St., Valparaiso; Devena Anderson, 31, East Chicago; David
Carlson,
40, 644 N. Calumet, Valparaiso; Roger Reese, 53, 3461 Sunnyside,
Portage.
ARRESTS
> Monday through Friday [ June 4 to June 8 ]
> Battery David Moore, 36, Calumet City
> David Daniel Moore court records: David D. Moore
> DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, IL
> case 64D 060706FD 4989 Monday June 4th 2007
> Class D Felony, Assault on somebody under 14 years old
> pretrial February 8th 8:30 hearing on March 12th 1PM
> The North Porter County complex is in Portage, Indiana
David Daniel Moore AKA David Ulanowski Random
DOB 9/26/70 Birth Mother Judith Ulanowski
Front Left pine tree and tree on blvd
Front Right pine tree stop sign
Right Side with bird feeder
Right Rear door
Parcel details
http://198.173.15.21/ccao/ParcelDetails.asp?PIN=30182330330000
Map
http://198.173.15.21/ccao/MapIndex.asp?action=parcel&PIN=30182330330000
Photo
http://198.173.15.21/AssessorPics/GeoSpan/30182330330000.jpg
http://www.cookcountyassessor.com/data/searchflat/ParcelImage.asp?pin=30182330330000
Dave's Adoptive Mother Janet M Moore 68 Calumet City, IL
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=850+buffalo+ave&where=Calumet+City%2C+IL
Dave's Birth Mother Judith A ULANOWSKI 71 Johnstown, PA
http://www.whitepages.com/search/FindPerson?firstname=judith&name=ulanowski&where=Johnstown%2C+PA
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=116+donald+lane&where=Johnstown%2C+PA
http://www.ancestry.com/facts/Ulanowski-family-history.ashx
Ulanowski Name Meaning and History
Polish: habitational name for someone from any of various places in
Poland called Ulany, Ulanów, or Ulanowice. The places are named with
the Polish personal name Ulan.
http://198.173.15.21/ccao/ParcelDetails.asp?PIN=30182330330000
Cook County Assessor's Office: Property Search Details
Property Index Number: 30-18-233-033-0000
View Property Picture
View Property Map
Address : 850 Buffalo Ave
City : Calumet City
Township : Thornton
Neighborhood : 61
Taxcode : 37030
Assessed Valuation
2008
First Pass Assessment 2007
Board of Review Certified
Land Assessed Value 3,025
2,521
Building Assessed Value 16,434
14,957
Total Assessed Value 19,459
17,478
Estimated Market Value 121,619
109,238
Property Characteristics
Class: 2-11
Description : Two to Six Apartments, Over 62 Years
Residence Type Two Story
Use Multi Family
Apartments Two
Exterior Construction Masonry
Full Baths 2
Half Baths 0
Basement1 Partial and Rec Room
Attic None
Central Air No
Number of Fireplaces 1
Garage Size/Type2 2.5 car detached
Building Square Footage: 1,752
Land Square Footage 6,304
Assessment Pass First Pass
Age: 27
Land Square Footage: 6,304
1 Excluded from Building Square footage, except apartment
2 Excluded from Building Square footage
Sunday, June 10, 2007
ARRESTS
Monday through Friday [ June 4 to June 8 ]
Battery David Moore, 36, Calumet City
David Daniel Moore court records: David D. Moore
DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, IL
case 64D 060706FD 4989 Monday June 4th 2007
Class D Felony, Assault on somebody under 14 years old
pretrial February 8th 8:30 hearing on March 12th 1PM
The North Porter County complex is in Portage, Indiana
219 759 8219 no e-records, won't fax or e-mail records
paid $2000 bond, Attorney Robert Harper Portage, Indiana
does not have a probation officer pre-trial
Keywords:
850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, Illinois 60409,
INTERNET STALKER CON ARTIST David Daniel Moore,
pathological liar David Daniel Moore,
internet psychopath David Daniel Moore,
hate site, sociopath stalker,pervert,creep
pathological liar David Daniel Moore
abusive real estate agents,deception,hacker,
sexual blackmail David Daniel Moore coward,
tara moreland, Linda Boss, janet m moore,
dawn moore, tara moreland, alias dustin calloway,
alias david miller, ULANOWSKI, alias david boss,
alias jeff johnson, criminal, computer hacker,
criminal hacker, internet stalkers, stalker,
internet harassment,ULANOWSKI, usenet threats
usenet forgery David Daniel Moore, forger,
new zealand hate site, internet libel
website of lies, chicagoland pansies
malicious use of employers computers,
formerly of Sara Lee Corporation, child abuser,
sara lee corporation, never employ this temp,
internet psychopaths, internet addiction,
Birth Mother Judith A Ulanowski, Johnstown, PA,
internet stalking, woman hater, blackmailer,
sexual harassment, stalker, sexual blackmail,
David Daniel Moore bbs blackmail,usmc 29 palms,
discharge for the good of the service,ULANOWSKI,
linda boss, formerly of Sara Lee Corporation,
short term contract programmer lotus,ULANOWSKI,
David Moore lives in his mommy's basement,
850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, Illinois 60409,
birth mother judith a ulanowski johnstown pa
adoptive mother janet m moore calumet city, il
temp worker, lotus consultant, temp worker,
short term contracts,IP address trickery,
casino software consultant moral terpitude,
computer identity forgery, mommys basement,
anonymous remailer stalkers, office disruption,
anonymous remailer abusers, coalition forces,
David Daniel Moore basement dweller,ULANOWSKI,
off shore website avid Daniel Moore,
new zealand, ULANOWSKI, malaysia website,
David Daniel Moore employer computer abuse,
obsessive compulsive disorder, ULANOWSKI,
AKA David ULANOWSKI Random,
Kent Wills
wrote:
You may LIE and claim datemas.de is an anonymous remailer as
often as you need. The truth will forever remain that it is not.
"Greg has some serious deviant behavior. I wouldn't let
him near a child."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, insane drunken (according to his
claims) owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team commenting
about his ONLY on-line friend.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[Context restored at no additional cost.]
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:0s4vj5d3r9le2d27d...@4ax.com...
>
>>>You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt? That explains so much
>>>for
>>>you, doesn't it? That way you never have to deal with somebody who LOVES
>>>to
>>>play different characters through ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
>>>their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion." That way you can be a front
>>>man
>>>for David Moore and accuse everyone who sees his little paw prints on
>>>posts
>>>as suffering this disorder. Convenient for you.
>
>> Nether Moe nor I use remailers (prove either of us do, if we do).
>> Greg often replies to my posts while referring to me as someone
>>else. He will also reply to the posts of another while addressing me.
>> If he were doing some sort of piggy back reply, he would make
>>mention of it. He doesn't. Clearly he thinks I am all of these
>>people.
>> If it isn't Fregoli, then he's lying. Which do you think is the
>>one?
>
> AH, but Wills, the point is that you DENY you are you.
No, the point is that Greg either has Fregoli or he has been
lying.
How does my pointing out that neither Moe nor I use remailers or
that Greg either has Fregoli or is lying equate to a denial that I am
me?
Even if either or both did, you ADMIT I am not Kent Wills. I use
one of the times you freely and openly admitted this as a sig. I
include the MID so that anyone with an interest may verify the quote.
BTW, Moe posts via Google. If the claim is true, and not the lie
I've already proved it to be, this would mean you believe he uses an
anonymous remailer.
Of course, he admitted, not so long ago, that he uses one .
According to him, the "=A0" characters that appear in nearly all of
his posts is due to his using anonymous remailers and such.
>Same deal just
>easier to disprove.
Yet you are reduced to LYING to try to prove your claim. You
fail, of course, but then you fail at everything. If you would be
honest, maybe you wouldn't fail.
>Your buddy Moore id doign his USUAL job of "WHINING
>LIKIE A BABY" to my ISP demanding I be removed.
So you claim. Each and every time you are asked to prove your
claim, you RUN or make up some BS reason as to why you can't.
I suspect you are in trouble with your ISP and/or web host for
some reason completely unrelated to David.
Your standard claim - Moore complained about you. Nonsense,
considering likely hundreds of people hate you enough to try and do
you dirty. And all it may be is that you're having trouble paying your
bills and they have given you a deadline.
>The little pussy does that
>every time he gets outed for his shit. The DDOS attacks against my host
>systems continues. Each time I mention them HERE they step up.
Prove it, unless you're lying.
>Now I am sure
>it could be a COINKYDINK.
Or, as I believe to be the case, you're lying.
>I wonder how many people will believe it though? I
>bet even YOU don't really believe it is all coincidence.
I don't believe it's happening at all. There is no evidence
available to support, let alone prove, the claim.
>Maybe you do, sfter
>all, YOU are a polack.
>
You're bigotry is well known and documented.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/race.html
Kent Wills
wrote:
>KRP > AH, but Wills, the point is that you DENY
>KRP > you are you. Same deal just easier to disprove.
>
>Datamas,de and eternal-september concealing his IP address.
I don't use eternal-september. I've never used it. As such, the
server is quite UNABLE to conceal anything of mine.
If I have used ES, please prove it. That you've LIED and claimed
I have in the past only stands to prove you lied, nothing more.
>
>KRP > Your buddy Moore id doign his USUAL job
>KRP > of "WHINING LIKIE A BABY" to my ISP
>KRP > demanding I be removed. =A0The little pussy
>KRP > does that every time he gets outed for his
>KRP > shit. The DDOS attacks against my host
>KRP > systems continues. Each time I mention
>KRP > them HERE they step up. Now I am sure
>KRP > it could be a COINKYDINK. I wonder how
>KRP > many people will believe it though? I bet
>KRP > even YOU don't really believe it is all
>KRP > coincidence. Maybe you do, sfter all,
>KRP > YOU are a polack.
>
>I bet Dan, Kent and Moe all know exactly what Davey is up to.
Last I knew, he was up to page 153 :)
Seriously, David doesn't send me a daily itinerary. I have no
idea what he's going to do today, tomorrow or any other date in the
future, save for the last week of February, 2010.
womanGoddess
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Hmn, your little fuss about what your ISP is supposedly going through
connected to you sounds a lot like you are trying to hide something
you are responsible for.
Oh, like maybe your ISP gave you a few warnings they were about to
drop you from their service, for some reason. Nonpayment, abuse of
services, violation of TOS agreement,....... any number of reasons why
that could happen because of your fault.
You started your roadrunner account on Nov. 1st after dropping ( or
being dropped by) your previous cable ISP provider. Enough time for a
warning for nonpayment of services, for example.
So this could be a preventive strike to cover something you messed
up.
womanGoddess
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:19:54 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >news:d1a24e27-4d4a-40ce...@a6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> >KRP > You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt?
> >KRP > That explains so much for you, doesn't it?
> >KRP > That way you never have to deal with somebody
> >KRP > who LOVES to play different characters through
> >KRP > ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
> >KRP > their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion."
> >KRP > That way you can be a front man for David Moore
> >KRP > and accuse everyone who sees his little paw
> >KRP > prints on posts as suffering this disorder.
> >KRP > Convenient for you.
>
> >KBW > Nether Moe nor I use remailers
> >KBW > (prove either of us do, if we do).
>
> >GH> Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
> >GH> while he posts through one.
>
> > I forgot about that one. datemas.de
>
> You may LIE and claim datemas.de is an anonymous remailer as
> often as you need. The truth will forever remain that it is not.
Agreed. Datemas is a newsreader service, not an anonymizer.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>
Kent Wills
What is perhaps the best is that it's claimed you use an
anonymous remailer.
The truth is you use Google to read and post. If it's an
anonymous remailer, then Greg makes use of one as well (Greg has
admitted he does, but not with Google). Whereas Ken has made it very
clear he believes David is the only person to make use of remailers,
Kenneth Robert Pangborn is claiming Greg is David.
The mind of Kenneth Robert Pangborn is an interesting one.
"Quotes below have been highly altered."
-- -- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team, accidentally
admitting in misc.legal that he alters posts when he replies.
Kent Wills
All very possible.
Given that Pangborn is the ONLY person aware that these DDOS
attacks are occurring, it's far more plausible than not that he's
lying about them.
When asked to offer something in the way of evidence for his
claim, he began demanding I post the evidence. That's a standard
tactic with Ken when he's lying. It's not exclusive, but he does like
to use it a lot.
>
> You started your roadrunner account on Nov. 1st after dropping ( or
>being dropped by) your previous cable ISP provider.
Ken dropped them shortly after they ceased offering Usenet.
>Enough time for a
>warning for nonpayment of services, for example.
Most certainly enough time.
>
> So this could be a preventive strike to cover something you messed
>up.
>
It is certainly possible. Even plausible, given Pangborn's
inability to accept when he's in the wrong.
"It's attached to a thing called a "WIFE" Betty."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn showing how he views his wife
as an object and NOT a human being.
Message-ID: <KLf2j.31312$9h.4837@trnddc07>
Greegor
Kent sure is ""helping you out"".
krp
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:19:54 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:d1a24e27-4d4a-40ce...@a6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>>KRP > You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt?
>>KRP > That explains so much for you, doesn't it?
>>KRP > That way you never have to deal with somebody
>>KRP > who LOVES to play different characters through
>>KRP > ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
>>KRP > their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion."
>>KRP > That way you can be a front man for David Moore
>>KRP > and accuse everyone who sees his little paw
>>KRP > prints on posts as suffering this disorder.
>>KRP > Convenient for you.
>>
>>KBW > Nether Moe nor I use remailers
>>KBW > (prove either of us do, if we do).
>>
>>GH> Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
>>GH> while he posts through one.
>>
>>
>> I forgot about that one. datemas.de
>
> You may LIE and claim datemas.de is an anonymous remailer as
> often as you need. The truth will forever remain that it is not.
Odd that your posts are routed through Europe though.
krp
> AH, but Wills, the point is that you DENY you are you. Same deal just
> easier to disprove. Your buddy Moore id doign his USUAL job of "WHINING
> LIKIE A BABY" to my ISP demanding I be removed. The little pussy does that
> every time he gets outed for his shit. The DDOS attacks against my host
> systems continues. Each time I mention them HERE they step up. Now I am
> sure
> it could be a COINKYDINK. I wonder how many people will believe it though?
> I
> bet even YOU don't really believe it is all coincidence. Maybe you do,
> sfter
> all, YOU are a polack.
MOE> Hmn, your little fuss about what your ISP is supposedly going through
MOE> connected to you sounds a lot like you are trying to hide something
MOE> you are responsible for.
How is that, Maureen?
MOE> Oh, like maybe your ISP gave you a few warnings they were about to
MOE> drop you from their service, for some reason. Nonpayment, abuse of
MOE> services, violation of TOS agreement,....... any number of reasons why
MOE> that could happen because of your fault.
You have a very rich set of delusions, McAllister. Care to tell me HOW
my websites violate the TOS of the host? I am sure with your EXPERTISE you
can tell us all the details. I am always amazed at your posturing of great
knowledge of telecommunications. So to punish ME, in your EXPERT OPINION,
for some imagined infraction of the terms of service, the Host provider
would take down THEIR OWN website to teach ME a lesson? That's something
that YOU might do, not sane people who run an ISP, however. It would be
entirely consistent with YOUR logic. My website has been located on their
servers for almost 20 years. But - YOU are the EXPERT here. <snicker>
Funnier still, the ISP hosts many other websites ALL of which went down.
YOUR claim that they'd take them ALL down to "warn" me is more than just a
little loopy, McAllister! REALLY!
The DDOS attacks continue, however the ISP now has somebody on 24/7 to
put the sites back up right away. Poor Davey is being PICKED ON UNFAIRLY
again!
Greegor
Yes Moe does.
KBW > If it's an anonymous remailer,
KBW > then Greg makes use of one as well.
It's not.
You use datemas.de and eternal-september.
Your IP address is deliberately obscured.
KBW > (Greg has admitted he does, but not with Google).
False claim again. Got a LINK to this admission?
> Whereas Ken has made it very
> clear he believes David is the only
> person to make use of remailers,
> Kenneth Robert Pangborn is claiming
> Greg is David.
> The mind of Kenneth Robert Pangborn is an interesting one.
You are a con artist, Kent Wills.
Greegor
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Moe KNOWS, she reads TRUE-CRIME stories
so she thinks she's almost as good as a criminologist!
Kent Wills
wrote:
>>> Oh, like maybe your ISP gave you a few warnings they were about to
>>>drop you from their service, for some reason. Nonpayment, abuse of
>>>services, violation of TOS agreement,....... any number of reasons why
>>>that could happen because of your fault.
>>
>> All very possible.
>> Given that Pangborn is the ONLY person aware that these DDOS
>>attacks are occurring, it's far more plausible than not that he's
>>lying about them.
>> When asked to offer something in the way of evidence for his
>>claim, he began demanding I post the evidence. That's a standard
>>tactic with Ken when he's lying. It's not exclusive, but he does like
>>to use it a lot.
>>
>>>
>>> You started your roadrunner account on Nov. 1st after dropping ( or
>>>being dropped by) your previous cable ISP provider.
>>
>> Ken dropped them shortly after they ceased offering Usenet.
>>
>>>Enough time for a
>>>warning for nonpayment of services, for example.
>>
>> Most certainly enough time.
>>
>>>
>>> So this could be a preventive strike to cover something you messed
>>>up.
>>>
>>
>> It is certainly possible. Even plausible, given Pangborn's
>>inability to accept when he's in the wrong.
>
>Loved the ""Dead Dad"" fake, Moe!
I'm not Moe. Once again you reply to one of my posts and address
me by the name of another.
Get help for your Fregoli, or complete INABILITY to be honest,
except by accident or force.
That aside, your reply makes no sense in the context of the post
to which you replied. At least not to a mind that hasn't been ravaged
from years of using and abusing illegal drugs. That it's makes some
sort of sense to you, as it must, only speaks to how far gone your
mind truly is.
Oh, double quotation marks still mean nothing, and they still
aren't used as scare quotes, no matter how often you LIE and claim
otherwise.
>
>Kent sure is ""helping you out"".
Again, double quotation marks mean nothing at all. By now even
someone as mentally retarded as you present yourself to be should be
able to understand this.
That aside, how am I helping myself out? In what was does your
drug addled mind see me as helping myself out?
>
>https://secure.public-records-now.com/Summary.asp?from=hys0353912977&piid=46&vw=people&input=address&addr=10420%20buckeye%20road&zip=&city=dardanelle&state=AR
>
>http://secure.public-records-now.com/summary.aspx?vw=people&input=name&fn=maureen&ln=mcallister&city=dardanelle&state=AR
>
>http://secure.public-records-now.com/summary.aspx?vw=people&input=name&fn=frank&ln=mcallister&city=dardanelle&state=AR
What does any of the above have to do with me? Please be
specific and prepared to have any and all lies exposed.
You may, if you wish, offer the tactic admission, by your own
standards, that another of your MANY drug induced lies has been
exposed.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Path: news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!
>feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.51.MISMATCH!
>tmp-post01.iad!news.highwinds-media.com!not-for-mail
>From: "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services,misc.legal,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,soc.veterans,soc.men
The reason for my quoting the portion above will become clear.
While your posts are routed through Russia and other countries.
From the headers of the post to which I am replying (also available at
the beginning of my reply):
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!
Note that your post was routed through a server in Russia. Does
this mean anything within the context you present? Of course not.
xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!
Oh look! Your post also routed through Handelsweg, Netherlands.
By your own standards, this must PROVE you use an anonymous
remailer, right?
209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!
69.16.185.51.MISMATCH!tmp-post01.iad!news.highwinds-media.com!not-for-mail
You really need to think through your lies a bit better, Ken. You
make it far too easy to expose you as the drunken liar you are.
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
<_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>MOE> Hmn, your little fuss about what your ISP is supposedly going through
>MOE> connected to you sounds a lot like you are trying to hide something
>MOE> you are responsible for.
>
> How is that, Maureen?
It's consistent with your persona.
This isn't proof, of course, but it is very plausible.
>
>MOE> Oh, like maybe your ISP gave you a few warnings they were about to
>MOE> drop you from their service, for some reason. Nonpayment, abuse of
>MOE> services, violation of TOS agreement,....... any number of reasons why
>MOE> that could happen because of your fault.
>
> You have a very rich set of delusions, McAllister. Care to tell me HOW
>my websites violate the TOS of the host?
Moe didn't mention the web site. She mentioned your ISP as can
be seen above.
Nice attempt to distract from what Moe actually presented. As
always, your deception failed.
>I am sure with your EXPERTISE you
>can tell us all the details. I am always amazed at your posturing of great
>knowledge of telecommunications. So to punish ME, in your EXPERT OPINION,
>for some imagined infraction of the terms of service, the Host provider
>would take down THEIR OWN website to teach ME a lesson?
Again, Moe mentioned your ISP.
You really make it far too easy to expose your drunken
pathological lies, Ken.
>That's something
>that YOU might do, not sane people who run an ISP, however. It would be
>entirely consistent with YOUR logic. My website has been located on their
>servers for almost 20 years. But - YOU are the EXPERT here. <snicker>
>Funnier still, the ISP hosts many other websites ALL of which went down.
You're web site has been on tampabay.rr.com for almost 20 years?
I think you're lying. Still.
>YOUR claim that they'd take them ALL down to "warn" me is more than just a
>little loopy, McAllister! REALLY!
Moe made no such claim.
Do you think at all before you post your lies?
>
> The DDOS attacks continue, however the ISP now has somebody on 24/7 to
>put the sites back up right away. Poor Davey is being PICKED ON UNFAIRLY
>again!
You're the one who claims you're being picked on.
I suggest you think though your lies before you post them. At
the very least lie about that which can't be proved so quickly.
"Maybe he's like me to attach some kiddie porn to aid his fantasies"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team, expressing his
fondness for child porn in
Message-ID:
<RECUi.494$Q%3.238@trnddc04>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>KBW > The truth is you use Google to read and post.
>
>Yes Moe does.
>
>KBW > If it's an anonymous remailer,
>KBW > then Greg makes use of one as well.
>
>It's not.
But Ken and you claim it is.
>You use datemas.de and eternal-september.
I've never used eternal-september. I don't have an account with
them. I don't expect I ever will.
But please prove your drug induced LIE that I use ES. I know I
would like to see your proof.
I use datemas.de and tornevall.net. I used to use Motz, but my
account expired due to lack of use. I've never had cause to get a new
one.
>Your IP address is deliberately obscured.
And?
It's still a news server and not, as you dishonestly claim, a
remailer.
You may present the same lie as often as your drug addled mind
demands. The truth will forever remain the truth.
>
>KBW > (Greg has admitted he does, but not with Google).
>
>False claim again. Got a LINK to this admission?
Yes.
Post the picture of David dressed as a Nazi and the picture of me
on a pony, or admit you've been lying about the existence of both the
whole time, and I'll gladly post it.
>
>>�Whereas Ken has made it very
>> clear he believes David is the only
>> person to make use of remailers,
>> Kenneth Robert Pangborn is claiming
>> Greg is David.
>>�The mind of Kenneth Robert Pangborn is an interesting one.
>
>You are a con artist, Kent Wills.
I am neither, as you are well aware.
Now be a good little welfare monkey and PROVE me correct by
posting that which has already been successfully countered and/or
information you admit isn't about me. You know you have no other
option available to you, short of openly admitting you've been lying.
--a true story
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
krp
GH> Moe KNOWS, she reads TRUE-CRIME stories
GH> so she thinks she's almost as good as a criminologist!
This is all so sad. POOR POOR Davey Moore is being picked on again
unfairly and is being denied his "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT" to shut off my
websites and his FREE SPEECH RIGHTS to mount his DDOS attacks. He'll tell
you that *HE* has this right. Other people don't but *HE* has SPECIAL RIGHTS
in the Constitution that apply ONLY to him!
krp
>>MOE> Hmn, your little fuss about what your ISP is supposedly going through
>>MOE> connected to you sounds a lot like you are trying to hide something
>>MOE> you are responsible for.
>>
>> How is that, Maureen?
> It's consistent with your persona.
> This isn't proof, of course, but it is very plausible.
When did you change your name to Maureen there Tinketbell?
>>MOE> Oh, like maybe your ISP gave you a few warnings they were about to
>>MOE> drop you from their service, for some reason. Nonpayment, abuse of
>>MOE> services, violation of TOS agreement,....... any number of reasons
>>why
>>MOE> that could happen because of your fault.
>> You have a very rich set of delusions, McAllister. Care to tell me HOW
>>my websites violate the TOS of the host?
> Moe didn't mention the web site. She mentioned your ISP as can be
> seen above.
> Nice attempt to distract from what Moe actually presented. As
> always, your deception failed.
Hi Polack - it's about MY host ISP and MY websites beign attacked. Too
comlicated for you to follow, MORON?
>>That's something
>>that YOU might do, not sane people who run an ISP, however. It would be
>>entirely consistent with YOUR logic. My website has been located on their
>>servers for almost 20 years. But - YOU are the EXPERT here. <snicker>
>>Funnier still, the ISP hosts many other websites ALL of which went down.
> You're web site has been on tampabay.rr.com for almost 20 years?
> I think you're lying. Still.
Poor confused Polack. My website isn't on Roadrunner.. You still have
difficulty follwing conversations without constant prompts. It's on
Intelligence Network. IDJIT!
krp
>>Path:
>>news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!
>>feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.51.MISMATCH!
>>tmp-post01.iad!news.highwinds-media.com!not-for-mail
>>From: "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>>Newsgroups:
>>alt.support.child-protective-services,misc.legal,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,soc.veterans,soc.men
> The reason for my quoting the portion above will become clear.
Another amazing adventure with a retarded Polck. READ ON.
> While your posts are routed through Russia and other countries.
Nope - READ ON.
> From the headers of the post to which I am replying (also available at
> the beginning of my reply):
Do you know how to READ headers, Polack?
> news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!
> Note that your post was routed through a server in Russia. Does
> this mean anything within the context you present? Of course not.
Nope dipshit that is NOT what it means. But since you are a RETARDED
POLACK, I can understand you inability to understand headers. You see,
WEENIE, what YOU quoted was the MESSAGE PATH I was replying to, in short
YOUR post.
OOOOOPIE!
freedom
>On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:19:54 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>news:d1a24e27-4d4a-40ce...@a6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>>KRP > You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt?
>>KRP > That explains so much for you, doesn't it?
>>KRP > That way you never have to deal with somebody
>>KRP > who LOVES to play different characters through
>>KRP > ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
>>KRP > their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion."
>>KRP > That way you can be a front man for David Moore
>>KRP > and accuse everyone who sees his little paw
>>KRP > prints on posts as suffering this disorder.
>>KRP > Convenient for you.
>>
>>KBW > Nether Moe nor I use remailers
>>KBW > (prove either of us do, if we do).
>>
>>GH> Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
>>GH> while he posts through one.
>>
>>
>> I forgot about that one. datemas.de
>
> You may LIE and claim datemas.de is an anonymous remailer as
>often as you need. The truth will forever remain that it is not.
He once claimed that Hotmail was a form of remailer.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn of KRP Consulting, 3648 Cockatoo Drive,
New Port Richey, Florida: neighbor of James Dziewinski, Michael P
Fiorentino, Esther Z Nikkila, Christopher W Kelly, Susan A Kelly, Thomas
Kelly, Kelly A Mcleod
"Carol Ann you don't KNOW shit! Youy are LYING! ...... Jesus Christ you are=
one DESPICABLE CUNT!!!! ....Bitch you are GUTTER SLIME!"
--Kenneth Pangborn, from a usenet argument with a female debator,
highlighting his typical views on women
"Rumors about ken are true, he is a bad man. That is why both my mother and=
I ran out of there as fast as we could back in the late summer of 2002. He
ruined my life and my moms life....His business is a scam, as he is in the
rest of his life. He enjoys child pornography and was investigated for that=
as well....he'll call my mom 20 times a day until she answers...[Ken's
sister-in-law Rebecca Reilly] wouldnt come over to our house anymore
because of how he would talk to her and come on to her....and he had over
180 pictures of her on his computer"
--Ken Pangborn's daughter Megan
"Blood, breath or urine?"
--question to Ken Pangborn from a Florida police officer in November 2008,
during a traffic stop from which Pangborn was subsequently charged with
DUI**
"...beating [some kids] into a bloody pulp is the ONLY thing=20
that would get through to them."=20
--Ken Pangborn on child rearing
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
--Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations=
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles, thinking
about hiring ken pangborn,florida trial consulting,florida false
allegations,child abuse,brianna bragg
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell, Ahmed
Gomez,Alejandro Querejeta Barcel=F3,Alina Gil,Ana Hern=E1ndez Chi,Aniely
Fernandez Torres,Anna Ruetten,Ariella Ochoa,Armando Gomez Pe=F1a,Camilo
Carbonell,Camilo Castro,Carlos Dorta,Carlos Manuel Gonzalez
Iglesias,Cathelijne Janssen,Chris Castellan,Cody Kuchirka,Di Addario
Sabrina,Diana Rosa,Elizabeth Perez Tamayo,Elsa M Pena,Elsa Mora,Eric Blanco=
Sancipri=E1n,Ernesto Ferriol,Frans Stamm'ler,George Riveron,Gigi
Tsang,Gioconda Carralero Dominicis,Glexis Novoa,Hayd=E9e Mar=EDa
Mart=EDnez,Jimini Hignett,Joan Hatten,Johan Martinez,Jorge Ferret
Vincench,Jorge Luis,Jose M. Cimarro,Jos=E9 Miguel Ricardo Tamayo,Juan Carlo=
s
P=E9rez Berb=E9n,Juan E. Mauriz-Gomez,Julio Cesar Guerrero,Julio Cesar
Rodriguez Aguilar,Julio Hernandez,Julio Quevedo,Katiuska Saavedra,Leandis
Diaz,Leticia Gallego Cruz,Leyda Rodriguez Ag=FCero,Lixandro Cordero,Lorver
Lores de Verdecia,Lourdes Castro Fuentes,Lourdes Gonzalez Herrero,Luis
Betancourt,Luis Castillo,Madelyn Tamayo,Magalys Reyes,Manuel Toledo,Marie
Louise Pepin,Max Schrems,Michael H. Miranda,Nani Garcia,Nestor Arenas,Nor
Gutiez,Norge Pazo Sanciprian,Oscar Fuentes Labrada,Osiris Aviles,Pupi
Pupito,Rafael Paneca Cano,Raimundo Cabrera,Reinaldo Rodriguez,Ricardo
Ponce,Ricardo Silveira Miro,Roger Castillejo,Ronald Guill=E9n=20
womanGoddess
Proof?
> YOUR claim that they'd take them ALL down to "warn" me is more than just a
> little loopy, McAllister! REALLY!
I never said that Kennie. Try to be honest once in awhile.
You claimed your web sites were targeted with a "DoS" attack. Not a
"DDoS", "DoS". If there supposedly was a mass attack on a group of web
sites, then your cliam that it was Moore targeting you is ludicrous.
You made the claims yet haven;t show the proof.
IOW typical Kennie lies.
>
> The DDOS attacks continue, however the ISP now has somebody on 24/7 to
> put the sites back up right away. Poor Davey is being PICKED ON UNFAIRLY
> again!
See above.
Get paranoid much Kennie?
womanGoddess
I know enough about how Kennie acts online to know anything he claims
has to be independently confirmed. Kennie is the one claiming there is
an " ongoing" DoS attack on his web sites but doesn't show proof.
It is likely that Kennie is trying to do a preemptive strike to
excuse his change of ISPs.
Greegor
What are you talking about?
You posted a link to a bogus OhBitchUary!
freedom
>wrote:
>
>[Context restored at no additional cost.]
>
>
>>
>>news:0s4vj5d3r9le2d27d...@4ax.com...
>>
>>>>You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt? That explains so much=
=20
>>>>for
>>>>you, doesn't it? That way you never have to deal with somebody who LOV=
ES=20
>>>>to
>>>>play different characters through ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just att=
ack
>>>>their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion." That way you can be a fron=
t=20
>>>>man
>>>>for David Moore and accuse everyone who sees his little paw prints on=20
>>>>posts
>>>>as suffering this disorder. Convenient for you.
>>
>>> Nether Moe nor I use remailers (prove either of us do, if we do).
>>> Greg often replies to my posts while referring to me as someone
>>>else. He will also reply to the posts of another while addressing me.
>>> If he were doing some sort of piggy back reply, he would make
>>>mention of it. He doesn't. Clearly he thinks I am all of these
>>>people.
>>> If it isn't Fregoli, then he's lying. Which do you think is the
>>>one?
>>
>
> No, the point is that Greg either has Fregoli or he has been
>lying.
> How does my pointing out that neither Moe nor I use remailers or
>that Greg either has Fregoli or is lying equate to a denial that I am
>me?
He makes the same claim about me. Supposedly I've denied who I am....
however, pointing out that he doesn't have accurate information on me
doesn't constitute denial of who I am. =20
He seems to think that he's so important, that any statement he makes
becomes fact, and anyone who contests it is lying, even if it's fact.
> Even if either or both did, you ADMIT I am not Kent Wills. I use
>one of the times you freely and openly admitted this as a sig. I
>include the MID so that anyone with an interest may verify the quote.
> BTW, Moe posts via Google. If the claim is true, and not the lie
>I've already proved it to be, this would mean you believe he uses an
>anonymous remailer.
> Of course, he admitted, not so long ago, that he uses one .
>According to him, the "=3DA0" characters that appear in nearly all of
>his posts is due to his using anonymous remailers and such.
>
>>Same deal just=20
>>easier to disprove.=20
>
> Yet you are reduced to LYING to try to prove your claim. You
>fail, of course, but then you fail at everything. If you would be
>honest, maybe you wouldn't fail.
>
>>Your buddy Moore id doign his USUAL job of "WHINING=20
>>LIKIE A BABY" to my ISP demanding I be removed. =20
>
> So you claim. Each and every time you are asked to prove your
>claim, you RUN or make up some BS reason as to why you can't.
> I suspect you are in trouble with your ISP and/or web host for
>some reason completely unrelated to David.
> Your standard claim - Moore complained about you. Nonsense,
>considering likely hundreds of people hate you enough to try and do
>you dirty. And all it may be is that you're having trouble paying your
>bills and they have given you a deadline.
I've made no complaints to his ISP.
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:091500a06f02986b...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>>>KRP > You do SO love that word "Fregoli" don't ya Kunt?
>>>KRP > That explains so much for you, doesn't it?
>>>KRP > That way you never have to deal with somebody
>>>KRP > who LOVES to play different characters through
>>>KRP > ANONYMOUS REMAILERS. You can just attack
>>>KRP > their "MARKS" as having a "fegoli delusion."
>>>KRP > That way you can be a front man for David Moore
>>>KRP > and accuse everyone who sees his little paw
>>>KRP > prints on posts as suffering this disorder.
>>>KRP > Convenient for you.
>>>
>>>KBW > Nether Moe nor I use remailers
>>>KBW > (prove either of us do, if we do).
>>>
>>>GH> Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
>>>GH> while he posts through one.
>>>
>>>
>>> I forgot about that one. datemas.de
>> You may LIE and claim datemas.de is an anonymous remailer as
>>often as you need. The truth will forever remain that it is not.
> He once claimed that Hotmail was a form of remailer.
What hotmail and gmail share with remailers is that they are THROW AWAY
free accounts. If you get locked out on one you just come back with a nedw
one. Like YOU did with Freedom and then Freedom with a number and you got
to Freedom23.
> The untruth about Kenneth Pangborn of KRP Consulting, 3648 Cockatoo Drive,
> New Port Richey, Florida: neighbor of James Dziewinski, Michael P
> Fiorentino, Esther Z Nikkila, Christopher W Kelly, Susan A Kelly, Thomas
> Kelly, Kelly A Mcleod
> Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
> harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false
> allegations
> Sancipri=E1n,Ernesto Ferriol,Frans Stamm'ler,George Riveron,Gigi
> Tsang,Gioconda Carralero Dominicis,Glexis Novoa,Hayd=E9e Mar=EDa
> Mart=EDnez,Jimini Hignett,Joan Hatten,Johan Martinez,Jorge Ferret
> Vincench,Jorge Luis,Jose M. Cimarro,Jos=E9 Miguel Ricardo Tamayo,Juan
> Carlos
> P=E9rez Berb=E9n,Juan E. Mauriz-Gomez,Julio Cesar Guerrero,Julio Cesar
> Rodriguez Aguilar,Julio Hernandez,Julio Quevedo,Katiuska Saavedra,Leandis
> Diaz,Leticia Gallego Cruz,Leyda Rodriguez Ag=FCero,Lixandro Cordero,Lorver
> Lores de Verdecia,Lourdes Castro Fuentes,Lourdes Gonzalez Herrero,Luis
> Betancourt,Luis Castillo,Madelyn Tamayo,Magalys Reyes,Manuel Toledo,Marie
> Louise Pepin,Max Schrems,Michael H. Miranda,Nani Garcia,Nestor Arenas,Nor
> Gutiez,Norge Pazo Sanciprian,Oscar Fuentes Labrada,Osiris Aviles,Pupi
> Pupito,Rafael Paneca Cano,Raimundo Cabrera,Reinaldo Rodriguez,Ricardo
> Ponce,Ricardo Silveira Miro,Roger Castillejo,Ronald Guill=E9n=20
> Keywords: david daniel moore pathological liar, david daniel moore
> calumet city, illinois, david daniel moore internet psychopath, Lotus,
> david daniel moore stalker, stalker, real estate agents, david daniel
> moore pathological liar, david daniel moore, pervert, abusive real estate
> agents, david daniel moore coward, david daniel moore computer hacker,
> david daniel moore criminal, internet stalkers david daniel moore,
> internet harassment david daniel moore, david daniel moore, moore the porn
> star, internet libel, david daniel moore website of lies,janet moore,
> sexual predator, 850 buffalo avenue, calumet city,illinos, dui, linda
> boss, ACT, Lotus Solutions consulting, david daniel moore malicious use of
> employers computers, pedophilia,
> david daniel moore sara lee corporation, never employ david
> daniel moore, internet psychopaths, david daniel moore, david kojack,
> moore, chicagoland pansies, internet addiction, internet stalking, woman
> hater,
> tara moreland, janet moore, dawn moore, alias dustin calloway, alias
> david miller, alias david boss, alias jeff johnson, blackmailer, sexual
> harassment,sexual blackmail, david moore bbs blackmail, david moore usmc,
> 29
> palms california,linda boss, david moore child abuser, anonymous remailer
> stalkers, anonymous remailer abusers, basement dwellers,off shore website,
> new zealand, malaysia website,employer hotel/casino,computer abuse, office
> disruption, obsessive compulsive disorder, four winds,calumet city drag
> queen, transvestite, sexual disorders, mglf, milwaukee general liberation
> front,punks, putz, bestiality, cowardice, forger, mommys basement,
> skinheads, forgeries, willian rainey harper college, coalition forces,
> buffalo, michigan, david moore coalition supreme allied commander,
> anonymous remailer stalkers, david moore womanizer, david daniel moore
> drag queen, lotus programs, IT contractors, david d. moore aryan nations
> member, blackmail,
womanGoddess
It wasn't bogus Greg. Call the newspaper.
Even your master Kennie knows it is a real obit.
Anything else, shit-boy?
womanGoddess
> DAVID D. MOORE INTERNET PSYCHO STALKER "freedom" <aboutKRP...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
I've used thsi Google account for years Kennie.
And Google is not an anonymizer.
Anything else Kennie?
Kent Wills
<about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
[...]
>>>GH> Typical. Kent denies anonymous remailers
>>>GH> while he posts through one.
>>>
>>>
>>> I forgot about that one. datemas.de
>>
>> You may LIE and claim datemas.de is an anonymous remailer as
>>often as you need. The truth will forever remain that it is not.
>
>He once claimed that Hotmail was a form of remailer.
He's made the same claim regarding Gmail.
At least E-mail is used with Hotmail and Gmail. They still
aren't remailers, of course.
>
>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>The truth about Kenneth Pangborn of KRP Consulting, 3648 Cockatoo Drive,
>New Port Richey, Florida: neighbor of James Dziewinski, Michael P
>Fiorentino, Esther Z Nikkila, Christopher W Kelly, Susan A Kelly, Thomas
>Kelly, Kelly A Mcleod
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team claiming in misc.legal
that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:7pc3k5dr9q6ce0tpp...@4ax.com...
>
>>>Path:
>>>news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!
>>>feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.51.MISMATCH!
>>>tmp-post01.iad!news.highwinds-media.com!not-for-mail
>
>>>From: "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>>>Newsgroups:
>>>alt.support.child-protective-services,misc.legal,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,soc.veterans,soc.men
>
>> The reason for my quoting the portion above will become clear.
>
> Another amazing adventure with a retarded Polck. READ ON.
>
>> While your posts are routed through Russia and other countries.
>
> Nope - READ ON.
If you're going to lie, and you are, DO NOT include the PROOF
that you're lying in your posts.
Anyone with an interest can see the path your post took to get to
me.
>
>> From the headers of the post to which I am replying (also available at
>> the beginning of my reply):
>
> Do you know how to READ headers, Polack?
Yes I do.
>
>> news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!
>
>> Note that your post was routed through a server in Russia. Does
>> this mean anything within the context you present? Of course not.
>
>
> Nope dipshit that is NOT what it means.
At least you admit that within the context you present, it means
nothing.
>But since you are a RETARDED
>POLACK,
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/race.html
>I can understand you inability to understand headers. You see,
>WEENIE, what YOU quoted was the MESSAGE PATH I was replying to, in short
>YOUR post.
>OOOOOPIE!
And your message was routed through Russia, as the headers prove.
No amount of your exposing your drunken stupidity will alter this
simple truth.
"Maybe he's like me to attach some kiddie porn to aid his fantasies"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
Kent Wills
wrote:
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:jqc3k5pnbtdpisi8t...@4ax.com...
>
>>>MOE> Hmn, your little fuss about what your ISP is supposedly going through
>>>MOE> connected to you sounds a lot like you are trying to hide something
>>>MOE> you are responsible for.
>>>
>>> How is that, Maureen?
>
>> It's consistent with your persona.
>> This isn't proof, of course, but it is very plausible.
>
> When did you change your name to Maureen there Tinketbell?
You're gay. Everyone appears to have accepted this. No one
shows any indication that they care, save you.
No amount of your addressing me by a cute pet name will get me to
suddenly return the romantic interest you have in me. Honestly.
Try a local gay bar, if there are any. You'll enjoy far better
luck there than you'll ever experience trying to get me to return your
sexual interest.
If you wanted Moe's opinion only, you should have E-mailed her.
When you post to Usenet, you invite anyone reading to reply. Just as
the post you're reading now invites anyone reading to reply.
>
>>>MOE> Oh, like maybe your ISP gave you a few warnings they were about to
>>>MOE> drop you from their service, for some reason. Nonpayment, abuse of
>>>MOE> services, violation of TOS agreement,....... any number of reasons
>>>why
>>>MOE> that could happen because of your fault.
>
>>> You have a very rich set of delusions, McAllister. Care to tell me HOW
>>>my websites violate the TOS of the host?
>
>> Moe didn't mention the web site. She mentioned your ISP as can be
>> seen above.
>> Nice attempt to distract from what Moe actually presented. As
>> always, your deception failed.
>
> Hi Polack - it's about MY host ISP and MY websites beign attacked. Too
>comlicated for you to follow, MORON?
Moe mentioned your ISP. In your standard attempt to distract,
you tried to get the focus placed on the web host.
As with EVERYTHING you try, you failed. I'm sure you're used to
it.
Since your deception has been exposed, please explain why you
want to keep attention away from your ISP. I think it's because you
are late on your payments and your access is going to be removed.
If that is not the reason, please detail the actual reason.
>
>>>That's something
>>>that YOU might do, not sane people who run an ISP, however. It would be
>>>entirely consistent with YOUR logic. My website has been located on their
>>>servers for almost 20 years. But - YOU are the EXPERT here. <snicker>
>>>Funnier still, the ISP hosts many other websites ALL of which went down.
>
>> You're web site has been on tampabay.rr.com for almost 20 years?
>> I think you're lying. Still.
>
> Poor confused Polack. My website isn't on Roadrunner..
Yet you claim above it's been there for almost 20 years.
Did you get confused as to what lies you had told?
>You still have
>difficulty follwing conversations without constant prompts. It's on
>Intelligence Network. IDJIT!
So why, in a conversation about your ISP did you claim it was
on there for almost 20 years?
I expect the truth is you were so drunk you got confused. You
see an ISP and the equivalent to a web host. While most ISP do have
web hosting abilities, your ISP is not, and never has, hosted your web
site.
Did you get confused, or were you lying? I'll accept either
answer, though I expect you to once again PROVE yourself the coward
you are by running away.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>> The DDOS attacks continue, however the ISP now has somebody on 24/7 to
>> put the sites back up right away. Poor Davey is being PICKED ON UNFAIRLY
>> again!
>
>GH> Moe KNOWS, she reads TRUE-CRIME stories
>GH> so she thinks she's almost as good as a criminologist!
>
> This is all so sad. POOR POOR Davey Moore is being picked on again
>unfairly and is being denied his "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT" to shut off my
>websites and his FREE SPEECH RIGHTS to mount his DDOS attacks. He'll tell
>you that *HE* has this right. Other people don't but *HE* has SPECIAL RIGHTS
>in the Constitution that apply ONLY to him!
You've yet to offer any proof that any such attacks are
occurring. Every time I check your web site, it's up and running.
Every time.
No one, except you, has claimed to have any problem with the
site. Maybe your ISP has some sort of glitch that's causing a DNS
error? Or maybe you're flat out lying?
"Miranda was a STUPID WASTE OF TIME AND DID NOTHING!"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting and The A-Team.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> You have a very rich set of delusions, McAllister. Care to tell me HOW
>> my websites violate the TOS of the host? I am sure with your EXPERTISE you
>> can tell us all the details. I am always amazed at your posturing of great
>> knowledge of telecommunications. So to punish ME, in your EXPERT OPINION,
>> for some imagined infraction of the terms of service, the Host provider
>> would take down THEIR OWN website to teach ME a lesson? That's something
>> that YOU might do, not sane people who run an ISP, however. It would be
>> entirely consistent with YOUR logic. My website has been located on their
>> servers for almost 20 years. But - YOU are the EXPERT here. <snicker>
>> Funnier still, the ISP hosts many other websites ALL of which went down.
>
>
> Proof?
>
These are the sounds of silence.... :)
>> YOUR claim that they'd take them ALL down to "warn" me is more than just a
>> little loopy, McAllister! REALLY!
>
> I never said that Kennie. Try to be honest once in awhile.
I'm beginning to question if he has the ability to be honest.
>
>You claimed your web sites were targeted with a "DoS" attack. Not a
>"DDoS", "DoS". If there supposedly was a mass attack on a group of web
>sites, then your cliam that it was Moore targeting you is ludicrous.
DDoS and DoS are pretty much synonymous. There are differences,
but Pangborn isn't going to understand them.
>
> You made the claims yet haven;t show the proof.
>
When I requested he prove his claims, he began DEMANDING that I
prove them false.
> IOW typical Kennie lies.
Again, I'm beginning to question if he has the ability to be
honest.
Kent Wills
<about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
[....]
>>>> If it isn't Fregoli, then he's lying. Which do you think is the
>>>>one?
>>>
>>> AH, but Wills, the point is that you DENY you are you.
>>
>> No, the point is that Greg either has Fregoli or he has been
>>lying.
>> How does my pointing out that neither Moe nor I use remailers or
>>that Greg either has Fregoli or is lying equate to a denial that I am
>>me?
>
>He makes the same claim about me. Supposedly I've denied who I am....
>however, pointing out that he doesn't have accurate information on me
>doesn't constitute denial of who I am.
In his drunken mind, not accepting you are who he claims means
denying who you are.
But then, he's freely and openly admitted my name in real life
isn't Kent.
"Kent is NOT Kent."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP CONsulting, acknowledging that
my name in real life is not Kent. Checking the MID will show he's
getting tired of explaining this to people.
Message-ID: <4b3b32c0$0$4973$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>
>
>He seems to think that he's so important, that any statement he makes
>becomes fact, and anyone who contests it is lying, even if it's fact.
Whereas he's claimed members of your family gave him absolute
PROOF that your middle name is Dennis and Daniel, it's clear facts
have no place in Pangborn's life.
[...]
>>
>>>Your buddy Moore id doign his USUAL job of "WHINING
>>>LIKIE A BABY" to my ISP demanding I be removed.
>>
>> So you claim. Each and every time you are asked to prove your
>>claim, you RUN or make up some BS reason as to why you can't.
>> I suspect you are in trouble with your ISP and/or web host for
>>some reason completely unrelated to David.
>> Your standard claim - Moore complained about you. Nonsense,
>>considering likely hundreds of people hate you enough to try and do
>>you dirty. And all it may be is that you're having trouble paying your
>>bills and they have given you a deadline.
>
>I've made no complaints to his ISP.
>
It far more plausible that Pangborn is about to lose his account,
for whatever reason, and he is desperately trying to keep this
possibility secret.
If this is the case, I know of no way to prove it.
>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>The truth about Kenneth Pangborn of KRP Consulting, 3648 Cockatoo Drive,
>New Port Richey, Florida: neighbor of James Dziewinski, Michael P
>Fiorentino, Esther Z Nikkila, Christopher W Kelly, Susan A Kelly, Thomas
>Kelly, Kelly A Mcleod
"Miranda was a STUPID WASTE OF TIME AND DID NOTHING!"
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Moe > �Get paranoid much Kennie?
>
>What are you talking about?
>
>You posted a link to a bogus OhBitchUary!
The obituary was an is very real. No amount of your lying will
alter this simple truth.
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
krp
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:18:14 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:jqc3k5pnbtdpisi8t...@4ax.com...
>>
>>>>MOE> Hmn, your little fuss about what your ISP is supposedly going
>>>>through
>>>>MOE> connected to you sounds a lot like you are trying to hide something
>>>>MOE> you are responsible for.
>>>>
>>>> How is that, Maureen?
>>
>>> It's consistent with your persona.
>>> This isn't proof, of course, but it is very plausible.
>>
>> When did you change your name to Maureen there Tinketbell?
>
> You're gay. Everyone appears to have accepted this.
On Planet Wills perhaps.
krp
"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a5d0dba9-57f2-4562...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
MOE> I've used thsi Google account for years Kennie. And Google is not an
anonymizer.
No, Maureen, but Hotmail and Gmail accounts are throwaways. They are
free, you never REALLY have to prove to them who you REALLY are, and if you
get bounced for abuse, you just get a new one a few minutes later. In THAT
respect they ARE similar.
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Anonymisers are used to hide IP addresses. Neither Hotmail nor Google
hides the IP address.
Anonymisers try to make it hard to trace posts. Google and Hotmail
don't deal with hiding traces of users.
Keep on showing your ignorance of computers and the internet Kennie.
How's that Santeria "curse" on Moore coming alomg, BTW?
Moe
Greegor
Moe > It wasn't bogus Greg. Call the newspaper.
Oh, I am sure it's a real obit, just NOT your fathers.
Greegor
His IP is concealed.
womanGoddess
You said it was fake.
Pick a lane greg.
womanGoddess
> The fact remains that Kent Wills uses an anonymous remailer.
>
> His IP is concealed.
Judging by how you are regarding Kent ( obsession stalker), you seem
sure you know exactly where he lives so what's it to you? Unless, OC
you know your stalking info on Wills is wrong and that is even not his
real name.
You use Google as your email address Greg.
Didn't you just refute what Kennie claimed about Google and Hotmail?
Greegor
G > You posted a link to a bogus OhBitchUary!
Moe > It wasn't bogus Greg. Call the newspaper.
G > Oh, I am sure it's a real obit, just NOT your fathers.
Moe > You said it was fake.
Moe > Pick a lane greg.
Half truth AND False dichotomy fallacy combined?
Your dishonesty and deviousness is showing, Moe.
Greegor
obituary as your fathers.
womanGoddess
Your illiteracy is showing.
It should be " dishonesty and deviousness ARE showing".
BTW projection noted.
womanGoddess
> You tried to pass off somebody else's
> obituary as your fathers.
Like you pass off various David Sullivans and David Moores as the
same people?
Seems to me you do what you accuse me of doing.
Interesting thing about fraternal relationships. One can have a father
of a last name pass away and have a brother of said parent with the
same last name come to the decedent's residence if the brother had a
will saying so. Certain circumstances could make that plausible.
The decedent is the right age, served in the USAF, and had at least
one daughter.
The clues correlate with what I claimed my father was.
Your refusal to admit my father as deceased could be your NEED to
believe otherwise.
womanGoddess
> obituary as your fathers.
I had more than one father?
" Fathers" is plural, not possessive.
Are you leaving room to acknowledge that I had more than one father?
(( smiles))
krp
On Jan 5, 11:40 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You tried to pass off somebody else's
> obituary as your fathers.
MOE> Like you pass off various David Sullivans and David Moores as the
MOE> same people?
PROVE that the alternate David Moores who appear here are DIFFERENT
PEOPLE, Maureen! Good luck on that one.
Greegor
G > obituary as your fathers.
Moe > I had more than one father?
Moe > " Fathers" is plural, not possessive.
Moe >
Moe > Are you leaving room to acknowledge that I had more than one
father?
Both named McAllister? Kinky!
freedom
>On Jan 5, 11:40=A0am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You tried to pass off somebody else's
>> obituary as your fathers.
>
> I had more than one father?
>
> " Fathers" is plural, not possessive.
>
>Are you leaving room to acknowledge that I had more than one father?
He's probably confusing you with himself. Greg had more than one father
(his birth father, who was a key member of a terrorist movement, and his
adoptive father.) I recently used his logic to prove this.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn of KRP Consulting, 3648 Cockatoo Drive,
New Port Richey, Florida: neighbor of James Dziewinski, Michael P
Fiorentino, Esther Z Nikkila, Christopher W Kelly, Susan A Kelly, Thomas
Kelly, Kelly A Mcleod
"Carol Ann you don't KNOW shit! Youy are LYING! ...... Jesus Christ you are=
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations=
Sabrina,Diana Rosa,Elizabeth Perez Tamayo,Elsa M Pena,Elsa Mora,Eric Blanco=
Sancipri=E1n,Ernesto Ferriol,Frans Stamm'ler,George Riveron,Gigi
Tsang,Gioconda Carralero Dominicis,Glexis Novoa,Hayd=E9e Mar=EDa
Mart=EDnez,Jimini Hignett,Joan Hatten,Johan Martinez,Jorge Ferret
Vincench,Jorge Luis,Jose M. Cimarro,Jos=E9 Miguel Ricardo Tamayo,Juan Carlo=
Kent Wills
wrote:
>The fact remains that Kent Wills uses an anonymous remailer.
No I don't.
I use a well known, and quasi-popular news server. No amount of
your drug induced lying will ever alter this simple truth.
>
>His IP is concealed.
That doesn't make a news server a remailer, no matter how many
times you LIE and claim it does.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>>> It's consistent with your persona.
>>>> This isn't proof, of course, but it is very plausible.
>>>
>>> When did you change your name to Maureen there Tinketbell?
>>
>> You're gay. Everyone appears to have accepted this.
>
> On Planet Wills perhaps.
Who hasn't accepted that you're gay?
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
<_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>G > You posted a link to a bogus OhBitchUary!
>
>Moe > �It wasn't bogus Greg. Call the newspaper.
>
>Oh, I am sure it's a real obit, just NOT your fathers.
It's fake, it's real.
Pick a land, dullard.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Jan 5, 10:52�am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The fact remains that Kent Wills uses an anonymous remailer.
>>
>> His IP is concealed.
>
> Judging by how you are regarding Kent ( obsession stalker), you seem
>sure you know exactly where he lives so what's it to you?
He's claimed to have PROVED I live in three different places, all
at the same time, via the phone book.
And don't forget how your IP traced to someplace in Thailand with
geotrack (or geotrace, the exact name escapes me), the tracer he uses.
>Unless, OC
>you know your stalking info on Wills is wrong and that is even not his
>real name.
He's admitted such.
>
> You use Google as your email address Greg.
>
> Didn't you just refute what Kennie claimed about Google and Hotmail?
>
BINGO!
I don't pretend to know what's going on between those two, but
the evidence that they are at odds is undeniable.
Of course, it could be an act.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>You tried to pass off somebody else's
>obituary as your fathers.
Please prove the man listed wasn't her dad.
I want actual proof. Proving that which is accepted (you believe
everyone with the same first and last name are all the same person)
won't be enough.
If you would prefer to make the tactic admission that you're
lying, that's acceptable as well.
The choice is yours, Greg.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
Since I did that over a year ago, there really is no gain in Moe
doing so. She would likely use the same evidence.
"I am insane!"
--Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-team,
posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated claiming that he was found
legally insane.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>G > You tried to pass off somebody else's
<Drug addled Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson mode>
That's not a denial.
</mode>
Don't you just HATE it when I use your own standards and tactics,
Greg? They ALWAYS make you look the drug addled FOOL you are.
womanGoddess
Mom liked the name so much she married his cousin.
freedom
>"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message=20
>news:aaf13674-389b-42c5...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>On Jan 5, 11:40 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You tried to pass off somebody else's
>> obituary as your fathers.
>
>MOE> Like you pass off various David Sullivans and David Moores as the
>MOE> same people?
>
>PEOPLE, Maureen! Good luck on that one.
www.aboutkenpangborn.com/wiki/index.php/David_Moore
Four different individuals named David Moore (clearly different people, as
they have different middle names), each of whom you've harassed on usenet.
Plus one instance in which you claimed your own name was David Moore,
thrown in just for fun.
To my knowledge, none of them have "appeared" here (other than one who made=
a single post, wondering why some lunatic from Florida was so obsessed with=
a complete stranger) but you've harassed them all here.
So, either the five David Moore's (David Darrell Moore, David Forest Moore,=
David Daniel Moore, David Dennis Moore, plus myself) are separate
people....or one person has legally changed his middle name at least three
times to thwart some fatass from Florida in an internet argument. =20