Re: Maureen mumbles her peg
yumhuyk
> KSIC > Obviously you have your facts wrong.
> KSIC > No surprise there. There are those
> KSIC > churches in N. America that quite
> KSIC > frankly just don't get what BL is all about.
>
> Moe > Actually they know what " BL is about".
> Moe > Money and vanity. Not about Jesus Christ.
>
> Maureen McAllister the raging pagan wages
> religious war by posing for a moment as a Christian..
>
> Don't you think that obsessing and gang stalking
> BL for TWENTY SIX YEARS is enough?
>
You'll never stop obsessing about Bob, Moe. Ever since 1985 he's
consumed your life. You want him, but he rejected you. That is why
you broke into his garage and did that to his child. Its the closest
you could come to him. But now you feel guilty which is why you
created Greg and Kent in order to place yours sins on them and leave
yourself blameless.
yours in Christ,
isamu
yumhuyk
>
> The truth is, you are lusting after Moe - want her BIG time, but even you realize she has better taste than that.
>
Why would I want a 50 year old spinster?
yours in Christ,
isamu
Kent Wills
>KSIC > Obviously you have your facts wrong.
>KSIC > No surprise there. There are those
>KSIC > churches in N. America that quite
>KSIC > frankly just don't get what BL is all about.
>
>Moe > Actually they know what " BL is about".
>Moe > Money and vanity. Not about Jesus Christ.
>
>Maureen McAllister the raging pagan wages
>religious war by posing for a moment as a Christian..
>
Not to the mentally sound.
As you so often PROVE, YMMV.
>Don't you think that obsessing and gang stalking
>BL for TWENTY SIX YEARS is enough?
Pretending your claim of stalking is true, how can Moe, a lone
entity, be a gang?
Please explain in great detail when you answer.
>
>Cripes, Moe, even the worst of the raging atheists
>would probably think you're a mental case for that!
>
>You go off on a windy rant instead of getting
>to the point that you asserted in your subject title.
>
>Did you ever get to your point even?
Moe didn't write for your fourth grade intellect.
>
>Why have you obsessed with him so much that
>you gang stalked and harassed Bob Larson for
>TWENTY SIX YEARS, Maureen?
>
How can one person be a gang, Greg?
>Did he pee in your Wheaties?
>You've obviously taken this VERY personally.
What are tonight's Powerball numbers, Greg? Unless I'm exposing
yet another of your MANY deceptions, you must be psychic. You
couldn't make the claim that you did without being psychic or lying.
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (Greg states they are as believable as the comment that
water is wet):
"I am Bob Larson."
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
as mentally ill as he presents.
Message-ID:
<df610804-da3b-4aa8...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Sunday, Feb. 27, 2011:
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.
TWellingfan
> On Jun 17, 9:29 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > KSIC > Obviously you have your facts wrong.
> > KSIC > No surprise there. There are those
> > KSIC > churches in N. America that quite
> > KSIC > frankly just don't get what BL is all about.
>
> > Moe > Actually they know what " BL is about".
> > Moe > Money and vanity. Not about Jesus Christ.
>
> > Maureen McAllister the raging pagan wages
> > religious war by posing for a moment as a Christian..
>
> > Don't you think that obsessing and gang stalking
> > BL for TWENTY SIX YEARS is enough?
>
> You'll never stop obsessing about Bob, Moe.
Question: Ho can I stop when I never started obsessing in the first
place?
> Ever since 1985 he's
> consumed your life.
Actually no. I have many interests and most of what I do is not
centered in any way around Bobbie E. Larson. I realize for a posturing
liar like you you cannot perceive of anyone keeping a casual interest
in a, for lack of a better word, personality, whose behavior can be
bizarre indeed.
> You want him, but he rejected you.
I WANT a piece of crap like Larson? Really?
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!
Yukkie, I'd hate to burst the pustule that substitues for whatever
actual thought you may have, but Bob Larson is NOT attractive to me at
all.
By your "reasoning", anyone who studies Hitler must have some love
affair with that psychopath. Sorry doofus. Not happening here.
> That is why
> you broke into his garage and did that to his child.
(( rolls eyes)) Your lies are so obvious that I can't imagine why
anyone would believe you. For some reason you mixed what gaggie claims
about Kent and what gaggie DID to a seven year old girl and claim I an
guilty of such a thing. I should tell you that your claim is not
possible for a variety of reasons. Aside, OC from it being one of the
lies you puke out.
> Its the closest
> you could come to him.
In all seriousness, why would I want to be near Larson, particularly
if I know he's a psychopath? My function regarding Larson is as an
observer and commentator. Frankly I feel sorry for his second wife and
her daughters. I serve, for lack of a better term, as an alternate
source regarding what the REAL: Bob Larson is as opposed to his PR
campaign to promote himself with his many boastings and lies.
> But now you feel guilty which is why you
> created Greg and Kent
I " created" greg and Kent? (( puzzled look)) Dude, I'd hate to
disappoint your rather overblown view of me being that industrious as
to actually pretend to be Gaggie and Kent, but those two are separate
individuals.
> in order to place yours sins on them and leave
> yourself blameless.
Yukkie, I don't claim to be "sinless", even when my religion doesn't
believe in sin per se. I, Kent, greg, Larson and you are all finite
human beings and we all mess up, say and do things we should not and
fail to be better than what we should be at all times. But sheesh, I'd
have better imagination than to create a turd brain like Hanson, and
as for Kent, well, gee, I'd be more, well, witty, than he is.
>
> yours in Christ,
> isamu
Moe
Greegor
Moe > By your "reasoning", anyone who studies
Moe > Hitler must have some love affair with that
Moe > psychopath. Sorry doofus. Not happening here.
Argumentum ad Hitlerium less than 10 posts into a thread?
That's a new record isn't it?
larsonomicon
> Actually no. I have many interests and most of what I do is not
> centered in any way around Bobbie E. Larson.
So true, there is being a Forever Night groupie, hanging out on true-
crime websites, going after Ted Kaldis, netstalking with Loretta, so many
things on your plate for sure.
larsonomicon
>>Maureen McAllister the raging pagan wages
>>religious war by posing for a moment as a Christian..
>>
>
> Not to the mentally sound.
That lets you out, trustafarian.
larsonomicon
Maid service?
Kent Wills
>Loretta?
>
>Spill!
>
>LOL
You really are putting in the overtime with your stalking, Greg.
Loretta hasn't posted for many years, yet you are COMPELLED to write
about her.
Yours is NOT the behavior of the mentally sound.
Let your shrink know about this at your next session, Greg.
Kent Wills
>On Jun 19, 5:04�pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Jun 19, 12:24�am, larsonomicon wrote:
>> >> TWellingfan wrote:
>> >> > Actually no. I have many interests and most of what I do is not
>> >> > centered in any way around Bobbie E. Larson.
>>
>> >> So true, there is being a Forever Night groupie, hanging out on true-
>> >> crime websites, going after Ted Kaldis, netstalking with Loretta, so many
>> >> things on your plate for sure.
>>
>> >Loretta?
>>
>> >Spill!
>>
>> >LOL
>>
>> � � �You really are putting in the overtime with your stalking, Greg.
>> Loretta hasn't posted for many years, yet you are COMPELLED to write
>> about her.
>> � � Yours is NOT the behavior of the mentally sound.
>> � � Let your shrink know about this at your next session, Greg.
>
>I never heard of Loretta until larsonomicon
>mentioned the name, and I asked (in a vernacular way)
>for him to spill the beans.
>
You and he are the same person. You PROVED this when you used the
quad nym.
Unless you're going to claim "he" LIED when he claimed you wrote
what he did.
Which will it be, Greg? Is he your sock, in which case no one
should pay attention to him, or did he lie, in which case no one
should pay attention to him?
I'll accept either answer.
>You sure are sensitive about past members
>of your gang netstalking campaings.
Lies on your part do not equate to truth on mine.
Nice try though.
I may adopt your method of deception. Don't go whining if I do
so. Express your joy over my finding YOUR method worthy of adoption,
if I do so.
>Maybe YOU should tell the story of Loretta, Kent?
Since you've clearly already spent a great deal of time reading
up about her, there will be no need.
Here's something you may not know, since I don't think it was
mentioned on Usenet. A few years ago she wrote an off-Broadway play.
From what I was told, it did pretty good.
I mention it because she was, and I presume still is, very open
about her drug addiction. She overcame her addiction and has become a
play write. If you work hard at mastering YOUR addiction to drugs
(unless your admission was a lie), you might be able to make something
of yourself as well.
You may not write a play and get it performed in New York, but
you'll certainly be better off than the sad, worthless, loser your
admitted use and abuse of illegal drugs has made you.
dmpsterdverdwn
> I'll accept either answer.
you'll accept a shoe in the teeth, burglar!
TWellingfan
Go ahead, sock tell him who Loretta is.
(( Sits back and lets Greg once again make a fool out of himself in
his " game"))
Moe
dmpsterdverdwn
> On Jun 20, 6:19 pm, dmpster dver dwn wrote:
huh?
dmpsterdverdwn
> Go ahead, sock tell him who Loretta is.
starting to sweat, maureen?
Dan Sullivan
<dmpster dver dwn> wrote in message
news:201106211640.UTC.itqhie$oip$1...@tioat.net...
> On 06/21/2011 04:50 AM, TWellingfan wrote:
>> Go ahead, sock tell him who Loretta is.
>
> starting to sweat, maureen?
Only if you ask her about Ralph.
dmpsterdverdwn
Dan Sullivan
<dmpster dver dwn> wrote in message
Jersey.
Dan Sullivan
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4e0138fe$0$23623$607e...@cv.net...
dmpsterdverdwn
TWellingfan
Ralph?
(( raises eyebrow)) Have you been talking to my boyfriend?
Moe
Kent Wills
>On Jun 20, 6:19�pm, dmpster dver dwn wrote:
>Tell me about Loretta, Please.
I doubt your sock puppet could tell you anything you don't
already know, Greg.
Greegor
In YOUR words.
Kent Wills
Context restored at no additional cost.
>>On Jun 19, 12:28�am, larsonomicon wrote:
>>> Greegor wrote:
>>> > Why have you obsessed with him so much that
>>> > you gang stalked and harassed Bob Larson for
>>> > TWENTY SIX YEARS, Maureen?
>>>
>>> > Did he pee in your Wheaties?
>>> > You've obviously taken this VERY personally.
>>>
>>> Exactly!
>>>
>>> What is her persoanl tie-in?
>>
>>Moe?
>
>Please tell me the whole story about Loretta, Kent.
>In YOUR words.
You can reply to your own posts claiming you are me as often as
you want, but you will forever remain the uneducated, unemployed LOSER
you are.
That aside, outside of your drug induced (unless you lied)
delusions, Moe and Loretta are not the same person. Really.
Greegor
larsonalia
> Please tell me the whole story about Loretta, Kent. In YOUR words.
Yes ""kent"" please do!
larsonalia
> You can reply to your own posts
You sure do!
larsonalia
> Please tell me the whole story about
> Loretta, Kent. In YOUR words.
Yes, please do!
%
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5af65b30-9fc9-4a60...@k27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> Please tell me the whole story about
> Loretta, Kent. In YOUR words.
>
>
yay
Kent Wills
Context restored at no additional cost
>>>>On Jun 19, 12:28�am, larsonomicon wrote:
>>>>> Greegor wrote:
>>>>> > Why have you obsessed with him so much that
>>>>> > you gang stalked and harassed Bob Larson for
>>>>> > TWENTY SIX YEARS, Maureen?
>>>>>
>>>>> > Did he pee in your Wheaties?
>>>>> > You've obviously taken this VERY personally.
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly!
>>>>>
>>>>> What is her persoanl tie-in?
>>>>
>>>>Moe?
>>>
>>>Please tell me the whole story about Loretta, Kent.
>>>In YOUR words.
>>
>> You can reply to your own posts claiming you are me as often as
>>you want, but you will forever remain the uneducated, unemployed LOSER
>>you are.
Greg? Are you offering the tacit admission that I was and am
correct? By the very standards you've DEMANDED be held to others you
are, but I'd like more than your drug induced (unless you lied)
standards.
>> That aside, outside of your drug induced (unless you lied)
>>delusions, Moe and Loretta are not the same person. Really.
>
>Please tell me the whole story about
>Loretta, Kent. In YOUR words.
You will already know all that I know, unless you LIED when you
claimed to have read all of my past posts.
Greegor
larsonalia > Yes ""kent"" please do!
Why NOT, Kent?
larsonalia
Oh Kent.....
Greegor
larsonalia > Yes ""kent"" please do!
larsonalia > Oh Kent.....
Don't you even want to post YOUR SIDE of the story, Kent?
larsonalia
> Context restored at no additional cost
Kent Wills = garage burglar.
Greegor
larsonalia > Yes ""kent"" please do!
G > Why NOT, Kent?
larsonalia > Oh Kent.....
Why are you too shy to tell YOUR side of the story about Loretta,
Kent?
Kent Wills
Kent Wills
I realize you are DESPERATE to be someone, ANYONE, other than the
uneducated, unemployed LOSER you are, but replying to your own posts,
calling yourself someone else will not change who you are. When you
look into the mirror, you will still see a "man" who is mentally
retarded and hasn't been gotten a job for over a decade due to the
fear regarding the garnishment order against him (see sig).
larsonalia
> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>G > Please tell me the whole story about Loretta, Kent. In YOUR words.
>>larsonalia > Yes ""kent"" please do!
>>G > Why NOT, Kent?
>>larsonalia > Oh Kent.....
>>
>>Don't you even want to post YOUR SIDE of the story, Kent?
>
> What story?
>
Coward.
larsonalia
> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>G > Please tell me the whole story about Loretta, Kent. In YOUR words.
>>larsonalia > Yes ""kent"" please do!
>>G > Why NOT, Kent?
>>larsonalia > Oh Kent.....
>>G > Don't you even want to post YOUR SIDE of the story, Kent?
>>
>>Why are you too shy to tell YOUR side of the story about Loretta, Kent?
>
> I realize you are DESPERATE to
Coward.
Greegor
larsonalia > Yes ""kent"" please do!
G > Why NOT, Kent?
larsonalia > Oh Kent.....
KBW > What story?
larsonalia > Coward.
If you don't want to tell YOUR side of the story,
Kent, or should I just quote your old posts
on the subject of Loretta?
Why wouldn't you want to post YOUR SIDE of the story first, Kent?
Kent Wills
>G > Please tell me the whole story about Loretta, Kent. In YOUR words.
>larsonalia > Yes ""kent"" please do!
>G > Why NOT, Kent?
>larsonalia > Oh Kent.....
>G > Don't you even want to post YOUR SIDE of the story, Kent?
>KBW > What story?
>
>If you don't want to tell YOUR side of the story,
>Kent, or should I just quote your old posts
>on the subject of Loretta?
Quote all you want. Just be sure to include the MIDs and/or
links to the archives so that context can be checked and confirmed.
Oops. Did I just ruin your game?
>
>Why wouldn't you want to post YOUR SIDE of the story first, Kent?
Answer the question I asked, coward.
Greegor
> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >G > Please tell me the whole story about Loretta, Kent. In YOUR words.
> >larsonalia > Yes ""kent"" please do!
> >G > Why NOT, Kent?
> >larsonalia > Oh Kent.....
> >G > Don't you even want to post YOUR SIDE of the story, Kent?
> >KBW > What story?
>
> >If you don't want to tell YOUR side of the story,
> >Kent, or should I just quote your old posts
> >on the subject of Loretta?
>
> Quote all you want. Just be sure to include the MIDs and/or
> links to the archives so that context can be checked and confirmed.
> Oops. Did I just ruin your game?
>
>
>
> >Why wouldn't you want to post YOUR SIDE of the story first, Kent?
>
> Answer the question I asked, coward.
Three different songs about Loretta:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Vbdg4NxvRU
Kent Wills
>On Jul 10, 5:29 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >G > Please tell me the whole story about Loretta, Kent. In YOUR words.
>> >larsonalia > Yes ""kent"" please do!
>> >G > Why NOT, Kent?
>> >larsonalia > Oh Kent.....
>> >G > Don't you even want to post YOUR SIDE of the story, Kent?
>> >KBW > What story?
>>
>> >If you don't want to tell YOUR side of the story,
>> >Kent, or should I just quote your old posts
>> >on the subject of Loretta?
>>
>> Quote all you want. Just be sure to include the MIDs and/or
>> links to the archives so that context can be checked and confirmed.
>> Oops. Did I just ruin your game?
>>
I must have ruined the game you wanted to play.
A real bummer for you.
>>
>> >Why wouldn't you want to post YOUR SIDE of the story first, Kent?
>>
>> Answer the question I asked, coward.
>
>Three different songs about Loretta:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Vbdg4NxvRU
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1uNhdXjz60
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdBnNzQz67A
Outside of your latest PROOF that you were honest when you
admitted you use and abuse illegal drugs, none of those apply to the
person you referenced.
The one from the Beatles (Get Back) is thought to be about Linda
McCartney's ex-husband, Joe See. This isn't a secret.
Is there anything, anything at all, about which you can be
honest, other than when you think honesty will advance one or more of
your MANY pathological lies?
This is a serious question, though you'll prove, once again, that
just the thought of having to answer a question causes you to soil
your pants in fear.
Greegor
> admitted you use and abuse illegal drugs, none of those apply to the
> person you referenced.
> The one from the Beatles (Get Back) is thought to be about Linda
> McCartney's ex-husband, Joe See. This isn't a secret.
> Is there anything, anything at all, about which you can be
> honest, other than when you think honesty will advance one or more of
> your MANY pathological lies?
> This is a serious question, though you'll prove, once again, that
> just the thought of having to answer a question causes you to soil
> your pants in fear.
You had your chance to tell your side of the story, Kent!
Grow some balls and tell us what you know about Loretta, Kent.
Kent Wills
There is no story to tell, dullard.
>Grow some balls and tell us what you know about Loretta, Kent.
You know all I know. Unless you LIED about reading all of my
past posts.
If there is something SPECIFIC you want to discuss, tell me. If
I know any details, I can share. I doubt she would mind since all I
know is that which she made public.
Greegor
> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Outside of your latest PROOF that you were honest when you
> >> admitted you use and abuse illegal drugs, none of those apply to the
> >> person you referenced.
> >> The one from the Beatles (Get Back) is thought to be about Linda
> >> McCartney's ex-husband, Joe See. This isn't a secret.
> >> Is there anything, anything at all, about which you can be
> >> honest, other than when you think honesty will advance one or more of
> >> your MANY pathological lies?
> >> This is a serious question, though you'll prove, once again, that
> >> just the thought of having to answer a question causes you to soil
> >> your pants in fear.
>
> >You had your chance to tell your side of the story, Kent!
>
> There is no story to tell, dullard.
>
> >Grow some balls and tell us what you know about Loretta, Kent.
>
> You know all I know. Unless you LIED about reading all of my
> past posts.
> If there is something SPECIFIC you want to discuss, tell me. If
> I know any details, I can share. I doubt she would mind since all I
> know is that which she made public.
Why were so many people angry at her, Kent?
Why did you rush to her defense?
Kent Wills
I wasn't aware so many were. Please explain.
Then explain why your OBSESSED with a woman who hasn't posted in
years and with whom you've never had any interaction.
Thanks in advance.
>Why did you rush to her defense?
I didn't.
But do prove your claim that I rushed to her defense. Unless I
just exposed another of your MANY drug induced (unless you lied)
pathological lies.
TWellingfan
Now he wants your balls Kent!
Yup Greg is homosexually interested in a straight married man.
Moe
larsonalia
Why won't you enter the chatroom, Moe-ron?
larsonalia
> I wasn't aware so many were. Please explain.
Why did you corrupt a minor?
Kent Wills
Old news now. Greg would often present the evidence that his
interest in me is purely sexual. The evidence has always been fairly
weak, but Greg has offered it himself.
I should point out that Greg may simply be displaying his bigotry
towards gays. It may be the equivalent of juveniles saying, "That's
gay!"
--
Aibohphobia: The fear of palindromes.
TWellingfan
> At one time, not so long ago, TWellingfan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Jul 10, 11:43 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Outside of your latest PROOF that you were honest when you
> >> > admitted you use and abuse illegal drugs, none of those apply to the
> >> > person you referenced.
> >> > The one from the Beatles (Get Back) is thought to be about Linda
> >> > McCartney's ex-husband, Joe See. This isn't a secret.
> >> > Is there anything, anything at all, about which you can be
> >> > honest, other than when you think honesty will advance one or more of
> >> > your MANY pathological lies?
> >> > This is a serious question, though you'll prove, once again, that
> >> > just the thought of having to answer a question causes you to soil
> >> > your pants in fear.
>
> >> You had your chance to tell your side of the story, Kent!
>
> >> Grow some balls and tell us what you know about Loretta, Kent.
>
> >Now he wants your balls Kent!
>
> >Yup Greg is homosexually interested in a straight married man.
>
> Old news now. Greg would often present the evidence that his
> interest in me is purely sexual. The evidence has always been fairly
> weak, but Greg has offered it himself.
> I should point out that Greg may simply be displaying his bigotry
> towards gays. It may be the equivalent of juveniles saying, "That's
> gay!"
No, that's TAKEI !!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRkIWB3HIEs&feature=youtu.be&a
Moe
>
> --
> Aibohphobia: The fear of palindromes.
>
> "I am Bob Larson."
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
> as mentally ill as he presents.
> Message-ID:
> <df610804-da3b-4aa8-aad0-638da7588...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
>
> A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
> Wiggly" Hanson (Greg states they are as believable as the comment that
> water is wet):
>
> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
> (DOB 05/22/1959)
> CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
> OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 2 SPEED
> Disposition Status
> GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
>
> "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
> Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
> attacking my first wife (deceased).http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
>
> Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
> drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
> alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
>
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
> "Of course."
>
> "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
> in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
> the Child Abuse registry, for example."
> -- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
> abuser
>
> " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
> minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
> minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
> the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
> address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
> April 2000, Gregory Hansonhttp://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
>
> Path:
> news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Greegor <greego...@gmail.com>
larsonalia
> Greg would often present the evidence that his interest in me is purely
> sexual.
You are nutty, ""Kent"".
Kent Wills
[...]
>> >Yup Greg is homosexually interested in a straight married man.
>>
>> Old news now. Greg would often present the evidence that his
>> interest in me is purely sexual. The evidence has always been fairly
>> weak, but Greg has offered it himself.
>> I should point out that Greg may simply be displaying his bigotry
>> towards gays. It may be the equivalent of juveniles saying, "That's
>> gay!"
>
>No, that's TAKEI !!
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRkIWB3HIEs&feature=youtu.be&a
Good one!
--
There is a chasm
of carbon and silicon
the software can't bridge.