INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT CENTER... an FBI - NW3C Partnership needs to hear from clients of ken pangborn, the a-team or krp consulting who believe they were the victim of a scam.
Dan Sullivan
National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
agencies for possible
investigation.
http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx
Dan Sullivan
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a5a1432$0$22535$607e...@cv.net...
Kenneth R Pangborn
3648 Cockatoo Dr
New Port Richey, FL 34652
(727) 842-6911
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Internet crime involves the use of the Internet to communicate false
or fraudulent representations to consumers.
Dan Sullivan
http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx
Internet crime involves the use of the Internet to communicate false
Greegor
INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT CENTER... an FBI - NW3C Partnership needs to
hear from clients of ken pangborn, the a-team or krp consulting who
believe they were the victim of a scam.
1 Dan Sullivan Jul 12
2 Dan Sullivan Jul 12
3 Dan Sullivan Jul 14
4 Dan Sullivan Jul 15
5 Dan Sullivan Aug 3
6 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
7 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
8 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
9 Dan Sullivan Jul 19
Make sure to tell them that Dan has NO CONNECTION
to David Moore's hate site and campaign of harassment.
Consult with Law Enforcement to confirm.
How old is KLS, Dan?
How old was she when she made the Puppet Bear comments?
3 years old or 8 years old?
What year was that?
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=6+S+Pine+lake+Drive&where=Patchogue%2C+NY
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.thebird.copwatch/msg/baf306e8b2a7716b
DS > Next grag will be claiming that someone is sending
DS > him reports about the age of your children.
Dan referred to children but he's talking about
his ADULT DAUGHTER, KLS, who as a child
was the victim of Dan's Puppet Bear condom.
Dan himself posted her statements several times.
Daniel J. Sullivan III (61), KLS (25) and SMS (60)
all live in Patchogue, NY. Dan claimed KLS was
3 when she made the Puppet Bear statements.
So, WHAT YEAR was KLS 3 years old?
How could she be 25 years old now?
Feb 2002 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/52b49e5611d619ea
April 2004 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d15f8e338226b780
July 2007 "My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.foster-parents/msg/2d04c26b08f9f2b9
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/448a77a42e2d1efc
David Daniel Moore AKA Freedom (from responsibility?) wrote:
If anyone has time, I could use some help.
I want to add a page to [hate site],
directed toward people who have already
been defrauded by Ken. Including this FTC
information, BBB, his local Chamber of
Commerce, etc. Work has become very
busy as I have taken an extra project.
If someone could compile something I
would greatly appreciate it!
krp
> INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT CENTER... an FBI - NW3C Partnership needs to
> hear from clients of ken pangborn, the a-team or krp consulting who
> believe they were the victim of a scam.
They NEED to hear? Did they tell you this personally Danny? Did they
CALL you and tell you this, or when you called to make your OFFICIAL REPORT?
Did they send you written confirmation of this, Danny? Or - - are you
claiming that they have a SPECIAL page on the FTC website that is devoted
to; "COMPLAINTS ABOUT KEN PANGBORN?" Do you have a link to it, Danny?
How long did YOUR complaint interview take, Danny? Did they THANK you
for your "INVESTIGATION?"
DAVID MOORE SAID
DDM< David Daniel Moore Freedom
(from responsibility?) wrote:
DDM> If anyone has time, I could use some help. I want to add a page to
DDM> [stalking site], directed toward people who have already
DDM> been defrauded by Ken. Including this FTC information, BBB, his
DDM> local Chamber of Commerce, etc. Work has become very busy as I have
taken
DDM> an extra project. If someone could compile something I would greatly
DDM> appreciate it!
NO COLLUSION THERE AT ALL BETWEEN SULLIVAN AND SLIPPERY DAVEY MOORE. NONE AT
ALL!
Dan Sullivan
whitevamp
Gee why all that shouting Kennie?
Kennie> WHIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!
Getting panicky?
((laughing))
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Dan Sullivan
Kent Wills
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:vMZem.1122$Jg....@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> DAN SULLIVAN
>
>> INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT CENTER... an FBI - NW3C Partnership needs to
>> hear from clients of ken pangborn, the a-team or krp consulting who
>> believe they were the victim of a scam.
>
>
> They NEED to hear?
Certainly. If your clients believe you scammed them, the proper
authorities need to be informed.
The authorities can investigate and find whether you have or have not
commited fraud.
>Did they tell you this personally Danny? Did they CALL you and tell you
>this, or when you called to make your OFFICIAL REPORT? Did they send you
>written confirmation of this, Danny? Or - - are you claiming that they have
>a SPECIAL page on the FTC website that is devoted to; "COMPLAINTS ABOUT KEN
>PANGBORN?" Do you have a link to it, Danny?
>
> How long did YOUR complaint interview take, Danny? Did they THANK you
> for your "INVESTIGATION?"
>
>
> DAVID MOORE SAID
>
> DDM< David Daniel Moore Freedom
> (from responsibility?) wrote:
>
> DDM> If anyone has time, I could use some help. I want to add a page to
> DDM> [stalking site], directed toward people who have already
> DDM> been defrauded by Ken. Including this FTC information, BBB, his
> DDM> local Chamber of Commerce, etc. Work has become very busy as I have
> taken
> DDM> an extra project. If someone could compile something I would greatly
> DDM> appreciate it!
>
> NO COLLUSION THERE AT ALL BETWEEN SULLIVAN AND SLIPPERY DAVEY MOORE. NONE
> AT ALL!
>
Gee, a coment Dave posted MONTHS ago. In your NEED to prove your
alcoholism, the same alcoholism you've twice claimed caused you to be found
legaly insane, forces you to be dishonest, you had to bring forth that which
has no bearing on what Dan wrote.
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:h5loli$5ti$1...@news.datemas.de...
>> DAN SULLIVAN
>>
>>> INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT CENTER... an FBI - NW3C Partnership needs to
>>> hear from clients of ken pangborn, the a-team or krp consulting who
>>> believe they were the victim of a scam.
>>
>>
>> They NEED to hear?
> Certainly.
Is it a CRITICAL NEED, Kent? Life and death? And they told you this?
> If your clients believe you scammed them, the proper authorities need to
> be informed.
How many do you claim have told YOU that I have, Kent?
> The authorities can investigate and find whether you have or have not
> commited fraud.
Sure they can. Are YOU ready to file a REPORT, Kent?
> Gee, a coment Dave posted MONTHS ago. In your NEED to prove your
> alcoholism, the same alcoholism you've twice claimed caused you to be
> found legaly insane, forces you to be dishonest, you had to bring forth
> that which has no bearing on what Dan wrote.
YOU are the one who is insane, Wills. Show us the FINDING you claim
exists. I am SURE you have it, you would NEVER - - LIE about such a thing,
would you Wills? You only burgle garages you NEVER lie, do ya Kent?
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:h5loli$5ti$1...@news.datemas.de...
>
>>> DAN SULLIVAN
>>>
>>>> INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT CENTER... an FBI - NW3C Partnership needs to
>>>> hear from clients of ken pangborn, the a-team or krp consulting who
>>>> believe they were the victim of a scam.
>>>
>>>
>>> They NEED to hear?
>
>> Certainly.
>
> Is it a CRITICAL NEED, Kent? Life and death? And they told you this?
You're hoping to convince the authorities that complaints against you should
only be investigated if they were critical, kenny boy?
>> If your clients believe you scammed them, the proper authorities need to
>> be informed.
>
> How many do you claim have told YOU that I have, Kent?
Doesn't matter who told him.
>> The authorities can investigate and find whether you have or have not
>> commited fraud.
>
> Sure they can. Are YOU ready to file a REPORT, Kent?
You REALLY are sweating this, kenny boy.
Greegor
KBW > the proper authorities need to be informed.
KRP > How many do you claim have told YOU that I have, Kent?
DS > Doesn't matter who told him.
It matters that neither of the two disgruntled clients are here.
Two disgruntled clients over THIRTY YEARS of clients.
You pack of liars want to pretend you have Ken
over a barrel for something, but all you have is lies.
Which investigative authorities do you think are
dumb enough to fall for false reports made from
fraudulent identities?
Did you REALLY think Davey slowed down
because he's so busy with WORK??
LOL
KBW > The authorities can investigate and find
KBW > whether you have or have not commited fraud.
KRP > Sure they can. Are YOU ready to file a REPORT, Kent?
DS > You REALLY are sweating this, kenny boy.
Yawn.
Do you get frequent flier miles for your ego trips, Dan?
Dan Sullivan
> KBW > If your clients believe you scammed them,
> KBW > the proper authorities need to be informed.
>
> KRP > How many do you claim have told YOU that I have, Kent?
>
> DS > Doesn't matter who told him.
>
> It matters that neither of the two disgruntled clients are here.
And you know for a fact there are no other former clients who think
they were scammed by kenny boy?
> Two disgruntled clients over THIRTY YEARS of clients.
And all the others were happy with pangborn?
ken claims 90% of his clients won sole custody of their children.
He also claims to have has approx 2500 clients.
So that's MORE THAN TWO THOUSAND people who were determined not to
have maltreated their children AND won SOLE CUSTODY on top of that!!!
And NOT ONE has posted their thanks to ken pangborn on their own
website.
> You pack of liars want to pretend you have Ken
> over a barrel for something, but all you have is lies.
How do you know any of the complaints are lies?
> Which investigative authorities do you think are
> dumb enough to fall for false reports made from
> fraudulent identities?
I doubt they'd investigate false reports.
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb892a85-9c0c-4b2c...@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
> KBW > If your clients believe you scammed them,
> KBW > the proper authorities need to be informed.
>
> KRP > How many do you claim have told YOU that I have, Kent?
>
> DS > Doesn't matter who told him.
>
> It matters that neither of the two disgruntled clients are here.
Why would ANY of my clients be here? They KNOW better than to listen to
a charlatan like Sullivan. As for Wills? His posts SCREAM that he's a nut
case.
krp
>>>> DAN SULLIVAN
>>>>
>>>>> INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT CENTER... an FBI - NW3C Partnership needs to
>>>>> hear from clients of ken pangborn, the a-team or krp consulting who
>>>>> believe they were the victim of a scam.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They NEED to hear?
>>
>>> Certainly.
>>
>> Is it a CRITICAL NEED, Kent? Life and death?
> Perhaps within the confines of your drunken mind set.
I'm not the one claiming that they "NEED!!!" to know. You NUTS are.
>>And they told you this?
> Outside of your latest drunken delusions, I've never claimed they did.
So - you are just speculating that I am MORFE important to the Feds than
terrorists, Kent? I am their #1 priority? That's a question, Kent. What are
YOU trying to say?
>>> If your clients believe you scammed them, the proper authorities need to
>>> be informed.
>>
>> How many do you claim have told YOU that I have, Kent?
> None have told me directly. And I've not claimed, directly or
> through implication, that any did. There are those former clients who
> have posted about how you scammed them. You even tried to blackmail
> one into silence, only be further exposed as the con man you were (and
> are).
WHO? MID's..
>>> The authorities can investigate and find whether you have or have
>>> not
>>> commited fraud.
>> Sure they can. Are YOU ready to file a REPORT, Kent?
> Since I've never hired you, there is no way you could have
> scammed me.
We'd never take YOUR cases Kent. We don't represent convicted FELONS.
> Odd that you think you did, given that you and I have never had a
> business relationship. Is this another indication that you were
> actually being honest when you claimed to have been found insane?
Never found to be "insane" Kent. Quite the contrary, in rather extensive
testing in my own custody case I was found to be VERY sane.
>>> Gee, a coment Dave posted MONTHS ago. In your NEED to prove your
>>> alcoholism, the same alcoholism you've twice claimed caused you to be
>>> found legaly insane, forces you to be dishonest, you had to bring forth
>>> that which has no bearing on what Dan wrote.
>>
>> YOU are the one who is insane, Wills. Show us the FINDING you claim
>>exists.
> YOU are the one who claimed to be insane. I simply cite and reference
> your claim.
> If your claim was a lie, just admit it.
I never claimed I had a problem with alcohol. Some how as YOU were
boozing it up in your delerium you thought I was drinking with you.
>>I am SURE you have it, you would NEVER - - LIE about such a thing,
>>would you Wills? You only burgle garages you NEVER lie, do ya Kent?
> If you were not found to be legally insane, why did you claim you
> were?
*I* didn't. YOU made the claim up all by your widdle self in one of
YOUR drinking binges.
> If alcoholism was not the cause of your mental illness that got
> you adjudged insane, why on at least two occasions did you claim it
> was?
I was NEVER adjudged insane insane, Kent, except in YOUR deluded brain.
> Serious questions that deserve honest answers. If you can
> overcome your pathological need to lie.
YOU dare lecture anyone ELSE about lying, Kent? YOU are the twice
convicted FELON here, NOT me! You HAVE been found to be dishonest in a court
of law.
Dan Sullivan
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:bb892a85-9c0c-4b2c...@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > KBW > If your clients believe you scammed them,
> > KBW > the proper authorities need to be informed.
>
> > KRP > How many do you claim have told YOU that I have, Kent?
>
> > DS > Doesn't matter who told him.
>
> > It matters that neither of the two disgruntled clients are here.
>
> Why would ANY of my clients be here? They KNOW better than to listen to
> a charlatan like Sullivan.
So it's your claim that NONE of your former clients believe they were
scammed by you, kenny boy?
whitevamp
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Considering the use of all caps you like to use , you seem to be the
one screaming here.
Dan Sullivan
krp
>>> KBW > If your clients believe you scammed them,
>>> KBW > the proper authorities need to be informed.
>>>
>>> KRP > How many do you claim have told YOU that I have, Kent?
>>>
>>> DS > Doesn't matter who told him.
>>>
>>> It matters that neither of the two disgruntled clients are here.
>>
>> Why would ANY of my clients be here?
>
> I recall reading Tom's comments and reading your attempt to black
> mail him into silence when he was exposing you for the fraud you were
> (and are).
First of all, as we NOW know, it wasn't "Tom" at all. Secondly there was
no "blackmail" to it. Just a simple statement of FACT. If any client wants
to take the issue into a public forum, they have "WAIVED" confidentiality.
Something YOU lack the live brain cells to understand Wills, is that
confidentiality is a contract term. It isn't a one way street. Also YOU
weren't there when it was going on, you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE
material that is HIGHLY edited. At first I thought it was Tom, but soon it
became obvious that it was Wilbur Street posting REVISED versions of that
Tom said, which was the opposite of what appeared in the newsgroup.
It is a simple fact that if a client wishes to attack anyone (myself, a
lawyer etc) in a public forum and make allegations he has surrendered
confidentiality. In this case the post indicated not just attacks on me, but
attacks on a lawyer, and professors at TWO major State Universities. A
thinking person might wish to look at that.
In the tirade, what do we see as FACT. When I was first contacted - he
had not had ANY contact with is child is over a year. He was facing multiple
criminal charges. He had one of the most prominent psychologists in the
country against him, claiming to document both domestic violence and child
sexual abuse. When our "Team" finished the case, all criminal charges were
dismissed with prejudice, and our expert had brokered not only joint custody
50/50, but had Tom and his estranged wife dealing with each other on a very
civilized level. I all that a win. All for $3500. How many men would find
$3500 dirt cheap to get a workable, lasting 50/50 custody deal and a
civilized relationship with their ex?
But even ASSUMING that it had been true, that Tom was the real Tom, who
would any normal person believe? Tom or a lawyer, two professors, a Ph.D.
psychologist that worked out the custody deal and myself? 5 against one? The
two professors one the dean of the school of psychology at one MAJOR state
University, the other being an M.D. at another Major State University who is
one of the most notable psychiatrists in the world.
Of course we know which side YOU are on Kent. Forget the facts. Just
rant.
krp
> A gentleman named Tomas comes to mind. When he was exposing how
> you conned him, you tried to black mail him into silence.
> Here's the MID where Tomas RUINS your attempt to black mail him:
Don't know any "TOMAS" but I did know as Tom. And the stuff posted on
ADRU did NOT come from the REAL one.
>
>> We'd never take YOUR cases Kent. We don't represent convicted FELONS.
>
> Since I've yet to be arrested for, let alone convicted of, a
> felony, I'm none too worried.
And yet the Supreme Court of Iowa says you were. Who do we believe? The
Iowa Supreme Court OR YOU?????
krp
>>>>> KBW > If your clients believe you scammed them,
>>>>> KBW > the proper authorities need to be informed.
>>>>>
>>>>> KRP > How many do you claim have told YOU that I have, Kent?
>>>>>
>>>>> DS > Doesn't matter who told him.
>>>>>
>>>>> It matters that neither of the two disgruntled clients are here.
>>>>
>>>> Why would ANY of my clients be here?
>>>
>>> I recall reading Tom's comments and reading your attempt to black
>>> mail him into silence when he was exposing you for the fraud you were
>>> (and are).
>>
>> First of all, as we NOW know, it wasn't "Tom" at all.
> You claimed it was.
First of all, I took the first post at face value like everyone else. As
more of the BS appeared it became obvious that it was NOT coming from Tom.
>>Secondly there was no "blackmail" to it.
> He was exposing the fraud you committed and you tried to
> blackmail him into silence by threatening to reveal all you knew.
No, Kent, I treated it as legitimate at first. What was being claimed
was a MISREPRESENTATION of the events. I pointed out that if a client
breaches the contract of confidentiality in a public forum, that it is
waived, PERIOD.
> It's too bad he ruined it by pointing out everything you knew was
> a part of the public record.
No - Kent I *KNEW* many things that were NOT in the public record. YOU
are just BUJLLSHITTING again.
>>Just a simple statement of FACT. If any client wants
>>to take the issue into a public forum, they have "WAIVED" confidentiality.
> You tried to black mail him into silence and failed.
Not true.
whitevamp
had an AOL account and golly, look what I found!!
(( beging C&P))
http://groups.google.com/group/wi.general/msg/55d391dcad28efad?dmode=source
PangK
View profile
>From: Michael Newton eyeofn...@worldnet.att.net >Message-ID: <38CC86C5.2...@worldnet.att.net >Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy, soc.men, wi.general, >alt.mens-rights >Idiot Kenny remains an illiterate feeb. Yeah yeah. If that were SO, Mikey, can you explain WHY it is that YOU have been selected for FOUR USENET KOOK citations and I haven't? Just in case you don't GET IT Nootie.. Being named a USENET KOOK is not exactly a GOOD THING! IN case your "feeble" mind doesn't get it, it is a vote amongs the users of the net that YOU... are a KOOK, or more simply put... INSANE! A whacko. Mentally unbalanced. A nut case. A inmate of the laughiing academy. An inhabitant of a rubber room. In short Mikey you are losing the battle. Let me remind you that the net has selected YOU as the KOOK and not I! Maybe it will dawn on you WHY.. But I rather boubt it. You are the biggest clueless fukwit I have ever encountered, next to Moore and Alexander.
Hide options Mar 13 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: wi.general
From: pa...@aol.com (PangK)
Date: 2000/03/13
Subject: Re: What I can't figure out: Why is Kenny so damned admired?
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
>From: Michael Newton eyeofn...@worldnet.att.net
>Message-ID: <38CC86C5.2...@worldnet.att.net
>Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy, soc.men, wi.general,
>alt.mens-rights
>Idiot Kenny remains an illiterate feeb.
Yeah yeah. If that were SO, Mikey, can you explain WHY it is that
YOU have
been selected for FOUR USENET KOOK citations and I haven't?
Just in case you don't GET IT Nootie..
Being named a USENET KOOK is not exactly a GOOD THING!
IN case your "feeble" mind doesn't get it, it is a vote amongs the
users of the
net that YOU... are a KOOK, or more simply put...
INSANE! A whacko. Mentally unbalanced.
A nut case. A inmate of the laughiing academy. An inhabitant of a
rubber room.
In short Mikey you are losing the battle.
Let me remind you that the net has selected YOU as the KOOK and not
I!
Maybe it will dawn on you WHY.. But I rather boubt it. You are the
biggest
clueless fukwit I have ever encountered, next to Moore and Alexander.
(( end C&P))
Seeing as how Kenneith Pangborn GOT a Kook of the Month Award, I find
his own words highly ironic!!
krp
>> No, Kent, I treated it as legitimate at first. What was being claimed
>>was a MISREPRESENTATION of the events. I pointed out that if a client
>>breaches the contract of confidentiality in a public forum, that it is
>>waived, PERIOD.
> Is that your LEGAL opinion?
Not MINE, Kent the Usnet jailhouse lawyer, but the opinion of REAL
LAWYERS.
> As you should know, but clearly don't, confidentiality is NOT
> waived because a client chooses to comment on how s/he was scammed.
Yes when they do it in a public forum and MISREPRESENT the facts. No
Kent they do NOT get to take free shots and claim immunity from dispute. The
FACTS remain, that when Tom first contacted me, he had not been allowed to
see his child for more than a year, he had been indicted on several criminal
charges, and was in a war with his estranged wife. When we did our thing, he
wound up with a good relationship with his ex-wife 50% legal and physical
custody, and ALL the criminal charges were dismissed with prejudice. All for
$3500. He even sent me photos of his custody time with the child.
The *REAL* Tom would NEVER have said what was being said in the second
message.
krp
"whitevamp" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2418dcc4-b099-4394...@s6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
MOE> Just for fun I did a little reading on Kennie;s post way back when he
MOE> had an AOL account and golly, look what I found!!
Maureen are you SURE (given the current reality with alt.Usenet.kooks)
that you want to bring up the KOTM awards? Especially from a guy (Michael
Newton) who won MORE of them than I did? Are you SURE you want to go there?
Those are in the BFD category. Amazing in the MILLIONS and MILLIONS of users
on Usenet they managed to get a WHOLE - count em EIGHT VOTES to make the
award. EIGHT KOOKS who are NOT in incredible HOT WATER themselves. KOOKS
handing out KOOK awards to others.
Want to talk about HOW the VOTED? They just toss up several names and
the one with the most votes gets the awards. There is NO vote AGAINST
placing someone with the award. The AUK cadre at the time was VERY SMALL,
maybe 20 people at its zenith. Isn't it funny that those who were the ring
leaders are NOW on the defense. In several ways. THEY were the REAL kooks!
whitevamp
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2418dcc4-b099-4394...@s6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
>
> MOE> Just for fun I did a little reading on Kennie;s post way back when he
> MOE> had an AOL account and golly, look what I found!!
>
> Maureen are you SURE (given the current reality with alt.Usenet.kooks)
> that you want to bring up the KOTM awards?
The issue was your words about the KOTM awards Kennie and how ironic
your own words are considering you got one yourself.
anythingelse you might bleat out is just your usual noise Kenniepoo.
>Especially from a guy (Michael
> Newton) who won MORE of them than I did? Are you SURE you want to go there?
> Those are in the BFD category. Amazing in the MILLIONS and MILLIONS of users
> on Usenet they managed to get a WHOLE - count em EIGHT VOTES to make the
> award. EIGHT KOOKS who are NOT in incredible HOT WATER themselves. KOOKS
> handing out KOOK awards to others.
And yet you got one. Aren't you special?
(( laughing))
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>
Greegor
On Aug 7, 12:07 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT CENTER... an FBI - NW3C Partnership needs to
> hear from clients of ken pangborn, the a-team or krp consulting who
> believe they were the victim of a scam.
> 1 Dan Sullivan Jul 12
> 2 Dan Sullivan Jul 12
> 3 Dan Sullivan Jul 14
> 4 Dan Sullivan Jul 15
> 5 Dan Sullivan Aug 3
> 6 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
> 7 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
> 8 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
> 9 Dan Sullivan Jul 19
>
> Make sure to tell them that Dan has NO CONNECTION
> to David Moore's hate site and campaign of harassment.
> Consult with Law Enforcement to confirm.
>
> How old is KLS, Dan?
> How old was she when she made the Puppet Bear comments?
> 3 years old or 8 years old?
> What year was that?
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=6+S+Pine+lake+Drive&where=Patchogue%2C+NY
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.thebird.copwatch/msg/baf306e8b2a7716b
> DS > Next grag will be claiming that someone is sending
> DS > him reports about the age of your children.
>
> Dan referred to children but he's talking about
> his ADULT DAUGHTER, KLS, who as a child
> was the victim of Dan's Puppet Bear condom.
>
> Dan himself posted her statements several times.
> Daniel J. Sullivan III (61), KLS (25) and SMS (60)
> all live in Patchogue, NY. Dan claimed KLS was
> 3 when she made the Puppet Bear statements.
>
> So, WHAT YEAR was KLS 3 years old?
> How could she be 25 years old now?
Feb 2002 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/52b49e5611d619ea
April 2004 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d15f8e338226b780
July 2007 "My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.foster-parents/msg/2d04c26b08f9f2b9
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/448a77a42e2d1efc
> David Daniel Moore AKA Freedom (from responsibility?) wrote:
>
> If anyone has time, I could use some help.
> I want to add a page to [hate site],
> directed toward people who have already
> been defrauded by Ken. Including this FTC
> information, BBB, his local Chamber of
> Commerce, etc. Work has become very
> busy as I have taken an extra project.
> If someone could compile something I
> would greatly appreciate it!
Dan Sullivan
>
> Still pretending you have no connection to Dave, Dan?
You have proof that I have a connection to Dave Moore, grag?
Dan Sullivan
Greegor
DS > You have proof that I have a connection to Dave Moore, Greg?
Already posted, but if you insist!
Why did you remove the very information you requested?
Why did you cut the cross post list?
Dan Sullivan
>
> G > Still pretending you have no connection to Dave, Dan?
>
> DS > You have proof that I have a connection to Dave Moore, Greg?
>
> Already posted, but if you insist!
>
> Why did you remove the very information you requested?
The information that proves I have a connection with Dave Moore?
> Why did you cut the cross post list?
I don't want to post to those groups.
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> David Daniel Moore AKA Freedom (from responsibility?) wrote:
>
> If anyone has time, I could use some help.
> I want to add a page to [hate site],
> directed toward people who have already
> been defrauded by Ken. Including this FTC
> information, BBB, his local Chamber of
> Commerce, etc. Work has become very
> busy as I have taken an extra project.
> If someone could compile something I
> would greatly appreciate it!
So Dave Moore posts a message that asks for "anyone" to help him, and
you believe that's credible evidence he is referring to ME???
Greegor
DS > You have proof that I have a connection to Dave Moore, Greg?
G > Already posted, but if you insist!
G > Why did you remove the very information you requested?
DS > The information that proves I have a connection with Dave Moore?
G > Why did you cut the cross post list?
DS > I don't want to post to those groups.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/448a77a42e2d1efc
David Daniel Moore AKA Freedom (from responsibility?) wrote:
DDM > If anyone has time, I could use some help.
DDM > I want to add a page to [hate site],
DDM > directed toward people who have already
DDM > been defrauded by Ken. Including this FTC
DDM > information, BBB, his local Chamber of
DDM > Commerce, etc. Work has become very
DDM > busy as I have taken an extra project.
DDM > If someone could compile something I
DDM > would greatly appreciate it!
DS > So Dave Moore posts a message that
DS > asks for "anyone" to help him, and you
DS > believe that's credible evidence he is
DS > referring to ME???
Just because you went to all of this trouble, you mean?
INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT CENTER... an FBI - NW3C Partnership needs to
hear from clients of ken pangborn, the a-team or krp consulting who
believe they were the victim of a scam.
1 Dan Sullivan Jul 12
2 Dan Sullivan Jul 12
3 Dan Sullivan Jul 14
4 Dan Sullivan Jul 15
5 Dan Sullivan Aug 3
6 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
7 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
8 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
9 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
10 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
11 Dan Sullivan Aug 9
12 Dan Sullivan Aug 10
13 Dan Sullivan Jul 19
krp
>>
>>MOE> Just for fun I did a little reading on Kennie;s post way back when he
>>MOE> had an AOL account and golly, look what I found!!
>>
>>
>> Maureen are you SURE (given the current reality with alt.Usenet.kooks)
>
> more "out there" views some people hold. It's change drastically in
> the past five or six years.
It used to be a slander palace. But even within the KOOK ranks - a
palace revolt was starting as far back as 10 years ago. The ruling asshole
cadre is now ON THE RUN. They are RUNNING like hell from law suits AND Law
Enforcement, Kent. YOU were one of the first KOOKS to be kicked out of the
KOOK PANEL.
> > Want to talk about HOW the VOTED? They just toss up several names and
> >the one with the most votes gets the awards. There is NO vote AGAINST
>>placing someone with the award.
> A person must be nominated and seconded. Then the FNVW (Last I
> knew, Pinku was the vote wrangler) holds an election and tallies the
> votes. A winner is declared.
Were there ever any NO votes allowed? Was there ANY way a nomination
could be opposed?
> You were nominated and a second was given. When the election was
> held, you had the most votes.
How many votes did I "win" by Kent? EIGHT! Out of MILLIONS! WOW! Eight
votes from KOOKS. Maybe you miss several magazine articles written on the
group, NONE of them flattering.
Dan Sullivan
Greegor
alt.Usenet.kooks)
> > It used to be a fun place where people could discuss some of the
> > more "out there" views some people hold. It's change drastically in
> > the past five or six years.
KRP > It used to be a slander palace. But even within
KRP > the KOOK ranks - a palace revolt was starting
KRP > as far back as 10 years ago. The ruling asshole
KRP > cadre is now ON THE RUN. They are RUNNING
KRP > like hell from law suits AND Law Enforcement,
KRP > Kent. YOU were one of the first KOOKS to be
KRP > kicked out of the KOOK PANEL.
What exactly was it that AUK booted you out for, Kent?
Was it that you brought AtlasBugged to them?
Was it that you took things REAL WORLD?
Was it just that your arguments were too damned stupid?
Greegor
Afraid you can't keep all your lies straight?
Afraid the archive will trip you up?
I asked you for the Police report number, city and
department many times, and you just dodged.
I wonder if AtlasBugged Nevins knows about
your Family Trust?
Did they set you up with a professional payee?
You're Mom's pretty good at that stuff.
The fear you'd blow it all on magic beans probably was some
motivation.
Especially with two+ thieving felonies and 2+ misdemeanors.
Volunteer work is all you could do.
Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-
online.de!t-online.de!news.buerger.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!
news.datemas.de!not-for-mail
From: Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-
services,soc.men,misc.legal,alt.law-enforcement,alt.true-crime
Subject: Re: Kent's eviction from AUK
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:55:43 -0500
Organization: The Kult of Kane
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <6d05859cekokan4s0...@4ax.com>
References: <517f21fb-e765-4794-8a9e-
b5f24e...@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <vMZem.1122$Jg.
2...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <829a2815-f142-404b-acb5-
dfaff4...@d23g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <2418dcc4-b099-4394-9ce1-
dfe1e9...@s6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <Xh_fm.1569$Jg.
5...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <6o82859kinvch1tum...@4ax.com>
<_8dgm.1564$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> <76b89406-0267-4fa3-8e18-
fabe1d...@18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: compu...@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.datemas.de Wg7Z6YwGiQiXoEsdicG7m
+wEezgboGKO4QBSSVjTLlc2OdLW/sBWhO6MwFqxkm2cfsJnfrTWuoiOgEHN1juBeg/
iVHSnf+eYafoULh1INMRyjXZWKSe1C3ajVhz5HdEhIhgEOKUEcTQU7sOgt6fQ
+ozSpB9tfJR2kJTZjqdVfLM=
X-Complaints-To: ab...@datemas.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 trialware
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:12:22 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>KRP > Maureen are you SURE (given the current reality with
>alt.Usenet.kooks)
>
>> > It used to be a fun place where people could discuss some of the
>> > more "out there" views some people hold. It's change drastically in
>> > the past five or six years.
>
>KRP > It used to be a slander palace. But even within
>KRP > the KOOK ranks - a palace revolt was starting
>KRP > as far back as 10 years ago. The ruling asshole
>KRP > cadre is now ON THE RUN. They are RUNNING
>KRP > like hell from law suits AND Law Enforcement,
>KRP > Kent. YOU were one of the first KOOKS to be
>KRP > kicked out of the KOOK PANEL.
>
>What exactly was it that AUK booted you out for, Kent?
Nearly a month after I announced I left, they got upset because I
reported Jonez for threatening my daughter's life. Clearly the bulk
of them didn't like it.
A few tried, and failed, to claim it was because when someone
filed an ethics complaint against Charles Novins, I chose to take the
heat off them.
If you've read his posts, you know that he's more unstable than
you, which is saying something. In time he learned that it wasn't
actually me, but I was willing to endure his slings and arrows while
the person (maybe personS) could expose him in relative safety.
>Was it that you brought AtlasBugged to them?
No. That was Roger.
For someone who claims he's read all my past posts, you sure
don't know what I've done on Usenet.
Are you offering proof that you were lying when you made that
claim?
>Was it that you took things REAL WORLD?
Since Jonez posted my phone number from when I lived in Chicago,
something that would very difficult to find, it was and is clear that
he knew (and knows) my real name. It's very likely he knows my
current address, though he's not offered any actual hints. When he
wanted my daughter to be murdered for not being white, I thought it
wise to alert law enforcement.
You have gotten your own copy of the report, right? Moe
explained, in what I felt was exhaustive detail, how to go about
getting one. Did you do it, or is the $5.00 fee more than you can con
out of Lisa?
>Was it just that your arguments were too damned stupid?
Since I offered no arguments, they could be neither stupid nor
intelligent.
Contrary to what your drug addled mind clearly thinks, one must
present an argument in order for it to have any sort of
classification. Really.
Dan Sullivan
Crash Override
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:12:22 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
>
> >KRP > Maureen are you SURE (given the current reality with
> >alt.Usenet.kooks)
> >
> >> > It used to be a fun place where people could discuss some of the
> >> > more "out there" views some people hold. It's change drastically in
> >> > the past five or six years.
> >
> >KRP > It used to be a slander palace. But even within
> >KRP > the KOOK ranks - a palace revolt was starting
> >KRP > as far back as 10 years ago. The ruling asshole
> >KRP > cadre is now ON THE RUN. They are RUNNING
> >KRP > like hell from law suits AND Law Enforcement,
> >KRP > Kent. YOU were one of the first KOOKS to be
> >KRP > kicked out of the KOOK PANEL.
> >
> >What exactly was it that AUK booted you out for, Kent?
>
> reported Jonez for threatening my daughter's life. Clearly the bulk
> of them didn't like it.
> A few tried, and failed, to claim it was because when someone
> filed an ethics complaint against Charles Novins, I chose to take the
> heat off them.
> If you've read his posts, you know that he's more unstable than
> you, which is saying something. In time he learned that it wasn't
> actually me, but I was willing to endure his slings and arrows while
> the person (maybe personS) could expose him in relative safety.
>
You've explained this to Greg and others enough times. Why do you keep
trying to teach people who can't learn?
> >Was it that you brought AtlasBugged to them?
>
> No. That was Roger.
> For someone who claims he's read all my past posts, you sure
> don't know what I've done on Usenet.
> Are you offering proof that you were lying when you made that
> claim?
Has Greg ever been truthful?
>
> >Was it that you took things REAL WORLD?
>
> Since Jonez posted my phone number from when I lived in Chicago,
> something that would very difficult to find, it was and is clear that
> he knew (and knows) my real name. It's very likely he knows my
> current address, though he's not offered any actual hints. When he
> wanted my daughter to be murdered for not being white, I thought it
> wise to alert law enforcement.
> You have gotten your own copy of the report, right? Moe
> explained, in what I felt was exhaustive detail, how to go about
> getting one. Did you do it, or is the $5.00 fee more than you can con
> out of Lisa?
Lisa has been getting tired of being Greg's punching bag.
>
> >Was it just that your arguments were too damned stupid?
>
> Since I offered no arguments, they could be neither stupid nor
> intelligent.
> Contrary to what your drug addled mind clearly thinks, one must
> present an argument in order for it to have any sort of
> classification. Really.
>
Greg is too stupid.
> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
> (DOB 05/22/1959)
> CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
> OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 2 SPEED
> Disposition Status
> GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
>
> "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
> Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
> stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
> MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
> http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
>
> " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
> minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
> minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
> the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
> address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
> April 2000, Gregory Hanson
> http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Crash Override
On Aug 7, 12:47 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> NO COLLUSION THERE AT ALL BETWEEN SULLIVAN AND SLIPPERY DAVEY
>>MOORE. NONE AT
>> ALL!
>
> Gee why all that shouting Kennie?
>
>Kennie> WHIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Getting panicky?
You folks have him very scared.
>
>((laughing))
Ken is having a meltdown and you laugh. That's mean. I like mean.
whitevamp
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
If Kennie had a literal meltdown his fat would have to be considered
a community health hazard.
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx
Internet crime involves the use of the Internet to communicate false
or fraudulent representations to consumers.
Greegor
It looks like you got caught in a big lie.
You claimed your daughter was 3 in 1993, but she would have been 9.
What's your explanation, Dan?
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=6+S+Pine+lake+Drive&where=Patchogue%2C+NY
Our Dan Sullivan
KLS wasn't 3 in 1993 since she's 25 now.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/ffcfecd9caf10ec6
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
From: dsull...@optonline.net (Dan Sullivan)
Date: 25 May 2003 05:59:23 -0700
Local: Sun, May 25 2003 7:59 am
Subject: Re: Arizona CPS Manual
[...]
I went thru the same situation in 1993.
After an examination by a court appointed evaluator the
judge thru out the SA petition against me and ordered
CPS to investigate the person who made the allegation.
CPS declined to investigate the accuser and actually
founded me for the molest despite what their evaluator
concluded and used her report which recommended that
their investigation focus on the accuser as credible
evidence that I did molest my little girl.
It took a year to have that reversed.
[...]
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx
Internet crime involves the use of the Internet to communicate false
Greegor
messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
Who brought up his daughter? Dan
Who told the Puppet Bear story several times? Dan
Who stated she was 3 in 1993 when it took place? Dan
Who talked himself up as the superior strategist? Dan
Dan, You claimed KLS was 3 in 1993 when
the Puppet Bear incident took place.
But KLS is 25 now, not 19. Did you LIE?
Do you have another child who is 19?
Did you think SPAMMING blind identical messages was smart?
1 Dan Sullivan Jul 12
2 Dan Sullivan Jul 12
3 Dan Sullivan Jul 14
4 Dan Sullivan Jul 15
5 Dan Sullivan Aug 3
6 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
7 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
8 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
9 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
10 Dan Sullivan Aug 7
11 Dan Sullivan Aug 15
12 Dan Sullivan Aug 15
13 Dan Sullivan Aug 16
14 Dan Sullivan Aug 20
15 Dan Sullivan Aug 9
16 Dan Sullivan Aug 12
17 Dan Sullivan Aug 13
18 Dan Sullivan Aug 14
19 Dan Sullivan Aug 10
20 Dan Sullivan Aug 11
21 Dan Sullivan Aug 16
22 Dan Sullivan Aug 17
23 Dan Sullivan Aug 18
24 Dan Sullivan Jul 19
Dan Sullivan
> Dan resorts to blind posting hundreds of identical SPAM
> messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
The following isn't spam.
Greegor
G > messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
DS > The following isn't spam.
Are you going to answer questions, Dan?
Who brought up his daughter? Dan
Who told the Puppet Bear story several times? Dan
Who stated she was 3 in 1993 when it took place? Dan
Who talked himself up as the superior strategist? Dan
Dan, You claimed KLS was 3 in 1993 when
the Puppet Bear incident took place.
You bragged how you whupped CPS.
But KLS is 25 now, not 19. Did you LIE?
Do you have another daughter who is 19?
womanGoddess
How many questions posed to you you HAVEN'T answered gaggie?
Lisa Renee Hanson (40) dob 8-19-1968
907 Moose Dr NW
Cedar Rapids, IA 52405
(319) 390-4696
Mark Thomas Hanson (44) dob 9-25-1964
907 Moose Dr NW
Cedar Rapids, IA 52405
(319) 390-4696
Dan Sullivan
> G > Dan resorts to blind posting hundreds of identical SPAM
> G > messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
>
> DS > The following isn't spam.
>
> Are you going to answer questions, Dan?
Yes.
Only one.
Now I'm finished.
Greegor
G > messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
DS > The following isn't spam.
G > Are you going to answer questions, Dan?
DS > Yes.
DS > Only one.
DS > Now I'm finished.
What's the matter, Dan?
I'm starting to think you were dishonest when you
told your stories of how you whupped CPS.
You claimed your daughter was 3 in 1993 when she
made the "puppet bear" comments.
You've bragged about that as early as 2002, if not before.
Your daughter KLS wasn't 3 in 1993 since she's 25 now.
She would have been 9 years old in 1993.
Did you lie or is there some logical explanation for this
inconsistency?
Dan Sullivan
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:29aeaa2e-8d60-45d3...@z24g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>G > Dan resorts to blind posting hundreds of identical SPAM
> G > messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
>
> DS > The following isn't spam.
>
> G > Are you going to answer questions, Dan?
>
> DS > Yes.
> DS > Only one.
> DS > Now I'm finished.
>
> What's the matter, Dan?
> I'm starting to think you were dishonest when you
> told your stories of how you whupped CPS.
You can think whatever you want, grag.
You can think it was OK for you to force an unrelated seven year old girl to
take cold showers because the mother supposedly gave you permission.
You can think it was OK for you to spank the same unrelated little girl
because the mother supposedly gave you permission.
You can think it was OK for you to be in the bathroom whenever the little
girl finished showering so you could hand her the towel.
> You claimed your daughter was 3 in 1993 when she
> made the "puppet bear" comments.
My daughter didn't make "puppet bear" comments.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Aug 22, 12:51�pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> G > Dan resorts to blind posting hundreds of identical SPAM
>> G > messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
>>
>> DS > The following isn't spam.
>>
>> Are you going to answer questions, Dan?
>>
>> Who brought up his daughter? �Dan
>> Who told the Puppet Bear story several times? �Dan
>> Who stated she was 3 in 1993 when it took place? Dan
>> Who talked himself up as the superior strategist? Dan
>>
>> Dan, You claimed KLS was 3 in 1993 when
>> the Puppet Bear incident took place.
>>
>> You bragged how you whupped CPS.
>>
>> But KLS is 25 now, not 19. �Did you LIE?
>>
>> Do you have another daughter who is 19?
>
> How many questions posed to you you HAVEN'T answered gaggie?
Pretty much all of them. He RUNS from them, since he realizes
that when he presents lies, and his use and abuse of illegal drugs
demands that he lie, they will be exposed.
>
>Lisa Renee Hanson (40) dob 8-19-1968
>907 Moose Dr NW
>Cedar Rapids, IA 52405
>(319) 390-4696
>
>Mark Thomas Hanson (44) dob 9-25-1964
>907 Moose Dr NW
>Cedar Rapids, IA 52405
>(319) 390-4696
>
>Moe
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Greegor
DS > My daughter didn't make "puppet bear" comments.
According to you she did!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/94ed9abf8fe68589
It took three appointments (programming sessions) before my daughter
said
"My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
The Fam Ct Judge threw the charges out of Court.
CPS founded me anyway.
It took a year to get their finding reversed.
Feb 2002 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/52b49e5611d619ea
April 2004 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d15f8e338226b780
July 2007 "My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.foster-parents/msg/2d04c26b08f9f2b9
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:29aeaa2e-8d60-45d3...@z24g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> G > messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
>
> DS > The following isn't spam.
>
> G > Are you going to answer questions, Dan?
>
> DS > Yes.
> DS > Only one.
> DS > Now I'm finished.
>
> What's the matter, Dan?
> I'm starting to think you were dishonest when you
> told your stories of how you whupped CPS.
Has Danny EVER shown ANYTHING remotely resembling "PROOF" that he beat
their ass? Sullivan makes all sorts of CLAIMS, but somehow never presents
the goods, both oh HOW he loves to demand from others what he NEVER provides
himself.
krp
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a90adcd$0$31268$607e...@cv.net...
>
> "Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:29aeaa2e-8d60-45d3...@z24g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>G > Dan resorts to blind posting hundreds of identical SPAM
>> G > messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
>>
>> DS > The following isn't spam.
>>
>> G > Are you going to answer questions, Dan?
>>
>> DS > Yes.
>> DS > Only one.
>> DS > Now I'm finished.
>>
>> What's the matter, Dan?
>> I'm starting to think you were dishonest when you
>> told your stories of how you whupped CPS.
>
> You can think whatever you want, grag.
> You can think it was OK for you to force an unrelated seven year old girl
> to take cold showers because the mother supposedly gave you permission.
Emergency subject change and EVASION noted. By now given your behavior
and TOTAL lack of evidence to support your WILD claims, most people aren't
finding you terribly credible Danny.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/8d43eb231c0ca53e
>
>DS > My daughter didn't make "puppet bear" comments.
>
>According to you she did!
Why do you lie?
The CPS caseworker you admire so much made the claim.
What, exactly, has you so enamored with CPS? Is it because you
hate families and they work to destroy families? If not, what is the
reason you work so hard to ensure CPS will always win?
Serious questions.
Kent Wills
Pot. Kettle. Kenneth Robert Pangborn.
"It's attached to a thing called a "WIFE" Betty."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn showing how he views his wife
as an object and NOT a human being.
Message-ID: <KLf2j.31312$9h.4837@trnddc07>
womanGoddess
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a90adcd$0$31268$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:29aeaa2e-8d60-45d3...@z24g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> >>G > Dan resorts to blind posting hundreds of identical SPAM
> >> G > messages rather than to answer pointed questions.
>
> >> DS > The following isn't spam.
>
> >> G > Are you going to answer questions, Dan?
>
> >> DS > Yes.
> >> DS > Only one.
> >> DS > Now I'm finished.
>
> >> What's the matter, Dan?
> >> I'm starting to think you were dishonest when you
> >> told your stories of how you whupped CPS.
>
> > You can think whatever you want, grag.
> > You can think it was OK for you to force an unrelated seven year old girl
> > to take cold showers because the mother supposedly gave you permission.
>
> Emergency subject change and EVASION noted. By now given your behavior
> and TOTAL lack of evidence to support your WILD claims, most people aren't
> finding you terribly credible Danny.
((BOOOOOMMMMM!!!)))
Dang, my irony meter exploded.
Greegor
G > According to you she did!
KBW > Why do you lie?
KBW > The CPS caseworker you admire so much made the claim.
That's not exactly what Dan said!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/94ed9abf8fe68589
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
From: "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:59:24 GMT
Subject: Re: Good touch - bad touch... do the children understand???
womanGoddess
> DS > My daughter didn't make "puppet bear" comments.
>
> G > According to you she did!
>
> KBW > Why do you lie?
> KBW > The CPS caseworker you admire so much made the claim.
>
> That's not exactly what Dan said!
>
>
> Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
> From: "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:59:24 GMT
> Subject: Re: Good touch - bad touch... do the children understand???
>
> It took three appointments (programming sessions) before my daughter
> said
> "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
Hey graggie, just wondering about a few things:
Who was Terri Mahoney and why was she involved with you?
Who was Kimberly Hough?
Do you have at least two convictions for drunken driving?
(( Smirks))
Greegor
Moe > Who was Terri Mahoney and why was she involved with you?
Moe > Who was Kimberly Hough?
I've never met anybody with either name
Moe > Do you have at least two convictions for drunken driving?
No. Not even one. I don't like liquor.
Did you forget that my court history has been publicly posted?
It was just a lame distraction, right?
krp
"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e91bfeef-83bb-47ee...@f37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 23, 10:59 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> DS > My daughter didn't make "puppet bear" comments.
>
> G > According to you she did!
>
> KBW > Why do you lie?
> KBW > The CPS caseworker you admire so much made the claim.
>
> That's not exactly what Dan said!
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
> From: "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:59:24 GMT
> Subject: Re: Good touch - bad touch... do the children understand???
>
> It took three appointments (programming sessions) before my daughter
> said
> "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
MOE> Hey graggie, just wondering about a few things:
MOE> Who was Terri Mahoney and why was she involved with you?
MOE> Who was Kimberly Hough?
I'll bite! WHO are they? I am SURE you're not STALKING Greg like you
WHINE that he is stalking you. Poor baby! You would NEVER "STALK" anyone,
would ya Moe? Not even a guy named Glen! Having ANY luck finding my
EXTENSIVE CRIMINAL HISTORY that you think exists in your deluded mind????
Find any arrests for ANYTHING other than a speeding ticket, Maureen? Did you
find those hundreds of DUI's you and your pals CLAIM I have? Were you able
to find even ONE???? Maybe a half of one? A hundredth of one?
Kent Wills
>
>"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:e91bfeef-83bb-47ee...@f37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>On Aug 23, 10:59 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> DS > My daughter didn't make "puppet bear" comments.
>>
>> G > According to you she did!
>>
>> KBW > Why do you lie?
>> KBW > The CPS caseworker you admire so much made the claim.
>>
>> That's not exactly what Dan said!
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>>
>> Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
>> From: "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:59:24 GMT
>> Subject: Re: Good touch - bad touch... do the children understand???
>>
>> It took three appointments (programming sessions) before my daughter
>> said
>> "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
>
>MOE> Hey graggie, just wondering about a few things:
>
>MOE> Who was Terri Mahoney and why was she involved with you?
>
>MOE> Who was Kimberly Hough?
>
> I'll bite! WHO are they? I am SURE you're not STALKING Greg like you
>WHINE that he is stalking you. Poor baby! You would NEVER "STALK" anyone,
>would ya Moe?
Does it bother you that Moe is doing to Greg what Greg tries to
do to so many others?
>Not even a guy named Glen!
Greg is the one who kept bringing up Glen.
>Having ANY luck finding my
>EXTENSIVE CRIMINAL HISTORY that you think exists in your deluded mind????
When, outside of your drunken stupors, has Moe claimed you have
any criminal history, let alone an extensive one?
>Find any arrests for ANYTHING other than a speeding ticket, Maureen? Did you
>find those hundreds of DUI's you and your pals CLAIM I have?
When, in reality and not your latest drunken delusion, has Moe
claimed you have one DUI, let alone hundreds?
When has ANYONE claimed you have hundreds?
Why do you harp on claims that, in reality, were never made?
>Were you able
>to find even ONE???? Maybe a half of one? A hundredth of one?
>
Since you alone see Moe having made these accusations, you alone
will be able to see if she's found anything.
Let us know what your boozing sees.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>DS > My daughter didn't make "puppet bear" comments.
>
>G > According to you she did!
>
>KBW > Why do you lie?
>KBW > The CPS caseworker you admire so much made the claim.
>
>That's not exactly what Dan said!
It's not verbatim, but the context is the same.
And once again you offer the proof yourself that you think
anything said by a CPS caseworker is 100% true and valid.
Why do you support CPS so much, Greg? Serious question.
Chester
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:59:04 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
>
> >DS > My daughter didn't make "puppet bear" comments.
>
> >G > According to you she did!
>
> >KBW > Why do you lie?
> >KBW > The CPS caseworker you admire so much made the claim.
>
> >That's not exactly what Dan said!
>
> It's not verbatim, but the context is the same.
> And once again you offer the proof yourself that you think
> anything said by a CPS caseworker is 100% true and valid.
> Why do you support CPS so much, Greg? Serious question.
>
> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
> (DOB 05/22/1959)
> CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
> OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 2 SPEED
> Disposition Status
> GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
>
> "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
> Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
> stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
>
> "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
> in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
> the Child Abuse registry, for example."
> -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
> Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
>
> " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
> minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
> minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
> the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
> address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
> April 2000, Gregory Hansonhttp://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Without a doubt, you two are the most repulsive people I've ever seen.
You both should have been castrated and had your hands cut off.
Greegor
Actually, Moe brought up Glen several times before
I had any cluse as to who he was.
She mentioned his name out of the blue once.
Clearly she was more than obsessed with Glen.
She asserted he was CONVICTED for CRIMES
yet she can't post any proof that he was.
Anybody can type Glen Frohman into Google
to see the extent of Moe's hate campaign.
womanGoddess
More like I was using once again your standards of :proof: in regards
to people's names. I just thought it would be fun to find A " Gregory
Hanson" and just give some noise that I " know' it's you.
Your standards of proof gaggie. You did this on Moore and on Wills.
I do find it interesting, though, that there is another Greg Hanson
living in the same state as you.
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
(( YAWN)) Done with your little shit fit Kennie?
What I did is use the same standards of " proof" grag uses when he
posts what he claims are facts about Moore, Sullivan, Kent and me. I
found it amusing that there is another " Greg Hanson" in Iowa that
physically assaulted one woman, got arrested twice for DWI and managed
to get divorced and married at least twice.
Now then Kennie, why are YOU so upset? Oh, I see, you want the focus
to be on you rather than your doggie. Did you actually believe what I
inferred WAS what your doggie did?
Tsk tsk Kennie. You should have more trust in your lackey.
Although the charge of physical assault does fit gaggie, the poor
woman was an adult and not his "SO", so graggie, being too chickenshit
to actually attack anyone he can't manipulate, obviously wasn't THAT
Gregory Hansion.
But glad to see you occasionally stick up for your doggie.
womanGoddess
> KBW > Greg is the one who kept bringing up Glen.
>
> Actually, Moe brought up Glen several times before
> I had any cluse as to who he was.
" Cluse"?
Gaggie, do try to stay to the facts. You were the one to mention
Glen. I just referred to him in my responses to you as the Ebay thief.
Then you made numerous references to posts online about how I was '
stalking" that bastard as part of YOUR cybertstalking on me. Then,
just to give you a crumb, I posted the URL for a now dead web site
about Frohman, which you in your obsessive way just HAD to post the
whole text and claim I was the author of the web site.
I was not the one to mention his name first. You were. Kennie, being
the illiterate he is, can't figureout " Glen" ha sonly one N,not two.
>
> She mentioned his name out of the blue once.
Where? Do you have the link?
>
> Clearly she was more than obsessed with Glen.
What is " more than obsessed"? Be specific now gaggie.
BTW did you find the article about his arrest yet?
>
> She asserted he was CONVICTED for CRIMES
> yet she can't post any proof that he was.
Actually I did. Its not my fault you can't connect the dots.
>
> Anybody can type Glen Frohman into Google
> to see the extent of Moe's hate campaign.
Oh you mean I hate " Relic Hunter"? I never even seen that TV series.