The Best of Horse Racing: Betting Systems, Strategies, Software

[ions...@gmail.com]

The software apps, strategies, systems, tips presented here deal with horse racing from two perspectives:

1) A form of digit lottery –
• pick-3 (i.e. trifectas)
• pick-4 (i.e. superfectas)

2) A form of sports betting –
• record the streaks and increase the bet accordingly.

1) The horses receive numbers, very much like in a pick-3 or pick-4 lottery. Usually the horse numbers represent the post positions. It is a mathematical fact that every pick-3, pick 4, digit lottery number has a repeat cycle based on the Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG).

For example, in 51% of the wins, an individual pick-3 digit repeats after 3 draws. This tip is also true for a horse race consisting of 10 horses. This represents one simple, the simplest winning system at horse racing in the manner of the pick-3 digit lottery.

Look at this simple but undeniable pick-3 idea. You only look at the last 3 races in your of the respective track. You choose at random any 3 unique numbers (representing horses). The winning probability increases almost 5 times. (0.51 / 3) ^ 3 = 0.0049 or '1 in 204'.

There is a lot to this theory, so the best start would be:

http://saliu.com/horses.html
“Win at horse races with betting systems for trifectas, superfectas, exactas. Mathematics creates strategies, winning systems, horse racing betting software.”

2) Take a look at the simplest horse wagering strategy known as the ‘Logical System’:

http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/649.html
“The Logical System is a free betting strategy to play at any horse tracks with a modest bankroll. The horse betting systems rely on favorites winning 33% of races.”

3) How about the software? There is plenty of that… dozens of programs and apps! All applications are available for download from this location:

http://saliu.com/free-horse-racing.html
“The best software download site in the world, loaded with software for horse racing, trifectas, superfectas, horse bet systems, wagering strategies.”

The two types of software are presented generously in dedicated eBooks:

http://saliu.com/horseracing-software.html
“The best horse racing software for generating trifectas is Bright: A collection of powerful programs for betting, wagering, winning at race tracks or online.”

http://saliu.com/ultimate-horse-software.html
“Ultimate Trifecta is the best software for any horse races, where the horses have numbers by post positions, from 1 to 8, 9, 10, 12, 20.”

Best of luck, axiomatics!

Ion Saliu (royalty name: Parpaluck)
Founder of Equestrian Mathematics
The Best Horse Bettor in History

[speculator]

How can a system that works well in Europe or Australia work the same way at the very different way racing takes place in North America

Even some of the BEST software suggests that you create a model of each race course and surface...

[Ion Saliu]

On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 4:24:26 PM UTC-4, speculator wrote:
> On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 2:59:42 PM UTC-7, Ion Saliu wrote:
> > The software apps, strategies, systems, tips presented here deal with horse racing from two perspectives:
> >
> > 1) A form of digit lottery –
> > • pick-3 (i.e. trifectas)
> > • pick-4 (i.e. superfectas)
> >
> > 2) A form of sports betting –
> > • record the streaks and increase the bet accordingly.
> >
> > 1) The horses receive numbers, very much like in a pick-3 or pick-4 lottery. Usually the horse numbers represent the post positions. It is a mathematical fact that every pick-3, pick 4, digit lottery number has a repeat cycle based on the Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG).
> >
> > For example, in 51% of the wins, an individual pick-3 digit repeats after 3 draws. This tip is also true for a horse race consisting of 10 horses. This represents one simple, the simplest winning system at horse racing in the manner of the pick-3 digit lottery.
> >
> > Look at this simple but undeniable pick-3 idea. You only look at the last 3 races in your of the respective track. You choose at random any 3 unique numbers (representing horses). The winning probability increases almost 5 times. (0.51 / 3) ^ 3 = 0.0049 or '1 in 204'.
> >
> > There is a lot to this theory, so the best start would be:
> >

> > https://saliu.com/horses.html

> > “Win at horse races with betting systems for trifectas, superfectas, exactas. Mathematics creates strategies, winning systems, horse racing betting software.”
> >
> > 2) Take a look at the simplest horse wagering strategy known as the ‘Logical System’:
> >

> > https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/649.html

> > “The Logical System is a free betting strategy to play at any horse tracks with a modest bankroll. The horse betting systems rely on favorites winning 33% of races.”
> >
> > 3) How about the software? There is plenty of that… dozens of programs and apps! All applications are available for download from this location:
> >

> > https://saliu.com/free-horse-racing.html

> > “The best software download site in the world, loaded with software for horse racing, trifectas, superfectas, horse bet systems, wagering strategies.”
> >
> > The two types of software are presented generously in dedicated eBooks:
> >

> > https://saliu.com/horseracing-software.html

> > “The best horse racing software for generating trifectas is Bright: A collection of powerful programs for betting, wagering, winning at race tracks or online.”
> >

> > https://saliu.com/ultimate-horse-software.html

> > “Ultimate Trifecta is the best software for any horse races, where the horses have numbers by post positions, from 1 to 8, 9, 10, 12, 20.”
> >
> > Best of luck, axiomatics!
> >
> > Ion Saliu (royalty name: Parpaluck)
> > Founder of Equestrian Mathematics
> > The Best Horse Bettor in History
>
> How can a system that works well in Europe or Australia work the same way at the very different way racing takes place in North America
>
> Even some of the BEST software suggests that you create a model of each race course and surface...

It is called RANDOMNESS, mate. Horse racing resembles lottery a lot. Matter of fact, everything is random, all the way to the edges of this Universe. For enlightenment:

• saliu.com/formula.htm
• Mathematics of Fundamental Formula of Gambling, Logarithms, "God", Randomness, Universe.

• saliu.com/bbs/messages/683.html
• Randomness, Degrees of Randomness, Universal True Random Numbers.

On the other hand, trends form universally, in all events (therefore random). There are horse tracks that show biases towards certain post-positions (PP), different from other PPs. Some horse numbers win more frequently than others at the same track. Other tracks show other horse numbers or post-positions that win more often.

• saliu.com/horseracing.html
• Horse Racing, Horses: Betting, Software, Systems, Tips, Payoffs.

[speculator]

THERE is only what works for you. I remain astounded at the dozens and dozens I run into who NEVER spend the time evaluating wager creation but go back and try to split more hairs on the handicapping side. WASTE of time

[Ion Saliu]

Additional topic Sectember 8, 2018 (the 'sect month'; ultimately, all humans have always been divided in a myriad of 'sects')

Can theories or methods with fancy names such as ‘artificial intelligence (AI)’ or ‘neural networking’ be applied to horse number selection? The good news is AI can be applied successfully even to horse racing. The trick is to apply the right theory or method. Neural networking does work, but only if horse racing is treated as lottery.

You can read (and surely replicate) a case where neural networking applied to a lotto game beat random play by a factor of 37. Yes, the artificial-intelligence strategy was 37 times better than simply selecting lotto numbers randomly!

• https://saliu.com/neural-networking-lottery.html
• Neural Networks, Artificial Intelligence in Lottery (Horses too): Strategies, Systems, Software.

[Ion Saliu]

• Announcement 13 Sectember 2018

Let's recognize September as the 'Sect Month'. Ultimately, all humans have always been divided into a myriad of 'sects'.

alt.sport.horse-racing is a sect; horse bettors make a sect; a horse track is a sect; jockeys have their own sect; etc. ... horses are NOT in any sect, however…

Ion Saliu,
Founder of Axiomatic Intelligence (AxI)
“The unknown hides in plain sight on the path of the axiomatics.”
• saliu.com/Ion_Saliu.html

[speculator]

There are many software packages that DO just this: HSH, HTR, Black Magic among others...Each allows a review of which, out of a myriad of separate factors, are UNDER utilized by the crowd...Only limitation is ones innovative data review. I really like the notion of POOL impact values that vassilate all over the place from venue to venue aka HOW the crowd at YOUR track bets....Can often find some really good ones like best F1 in turf races works well at Woodbine. There are loads of others that do not even seem logical but it is the iconoclastic mind that garners the long priced wagers. Hail the innovators

[Ion Saliu]

• Discovered the Best Live Sports Sites to Watch Free Streams Online All over the World.
• Watch free live video streaming of sporting events online: football, soccer, NFL, hockey, basketball, tennis, baseball, UEFA Champions League, horse races, many sports.

• software.saliu.com/live-sports-streams.html

Enjoy it, kokodrilo (royalty-name for ‘big-time gambler/bettor’)!

Ion Saliu,
Founder of Axiomatic Intelligence (AxI)
“The unknown hides in plain sight on the path of the axiomatics.”

• saliu.com/gambling-lottery-lotto/prediction-science.htm
"Science of Prediction: Gambling, Lottery, Horse-racing, Nature (Weather Forecasting)".

[Ion Saliu]

• Rocktober 8, 2018

Worthy threads in this very newsgroup

• https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sport.horse-racing/S3tzjDHe4vI
• Horse Racing Generator, Trifectas, Random Numbers

• https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sport.horse-racing/h0_JbM7WPA8
• Horse Racing: Odds Calculator

[Mr. G]

On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:14:28 UTC, Ion Saliu <ions...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> ƒÕ½ Rocktober 8, 2018

>
> Worthy threads in this very newsgroup
>

> ƒÕ½ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sport.horse-racing/S3tzjDHe4vI
> ƒÕ½ Horse Racing Generator, Trifectas, Random Numbers
>
> ƒÕ½ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sport.horse-racing/h0_JbM7WPA8
> ƒÕ½ Horse Racing: Odds Calculator
>

Sorry, not worthy threads for me...

[Ion Saliu]

On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 4:59:42 PM UTC-5, Ion Saliu wrote:
>
… updating links to HTTPS…

>
> There is a lot to this theory, so the best start would be:
>

https://saliu.com/horses.html
“Win at horse races with betting systems for trifectas, superfectas, exactas. Mathematics creates strategies, winning systems, horse racing betting software”.

>
> 2) Take a look at the simplest horse wagering strategy known as the ‘Logical System’:
>

https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/649.html
“The Logical System is a free betting strategy to play at any horse tracks with a modest bankroll. The horse betting systems rely on favorites winning 33% of races”.

>
> 3) How about the software? There is plenty of that… dozens of programs and apps! All applications are available for download from this location:
>

https://saliu.com/free-horse-racing.html
“The best software download site in the world, loaded with software for horse racing, trifectas, superfectas, horse bet systems, wagering strategies”.

>
> The two types of software are presented generously in dedicated eBooks:
>

https://saliu.com/horseracing-software.html
“The best horse racing software for generating trifectas is Bright: A collection of powerful programs for betting, wagering, winning at race tracks or online”.
>
https://saliu.com/ultimate-horse-software.html
“Ultimate Trifecta is the best software for any horse races, where the horses have numbers by post positions, from 1 to 8, 9, 10, 12, 20”.
>

[Ion Saliu]

On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 5:45:23 PM UTC-4, Ion Saliu wrote:
>
… updating links to HTTPS…
>

> It is called RANDOMNESS, mate. Horse racing resembles lottery a lot. Matter of fact, everything is random, all the way to the edges of this Universe. For enlightenment:
>

• https://saliu.com/formula.htm

• "Mathematics of Fundamental Formula of Gambling, Logarithms, "God", Randomness, Universe".
>

• https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/683.html

• "Randomness, Degrees of Randomness, Universal True Random Numbers".
>
> On the other hand, trends form universally, in all events (therefore random). There are horse tracks that show biases towards certain post-positions (PP), different from other PPs. Some horse numbers win more frequently than others at the same track. Other tracks show other horse numbers or post-positions that win more often.
>

• https://saliu.com/horseracing.html

[Ion Saliu]

On Saturday, September 15, 2018 at 12:30:29 PM UTC-4, Ion Saliu wrote:
>
… updating links to HTTPS…

>
> > Ion Saliu,
> > Founder of Axiomatic Intelligence (AxI)
> > “The unknown hides in plain sight on the path of the axiomatics.”

• https://saliu.com/Ion_Saliu.html

>
• Discovered the Best Live Sports Sites to Watch Free Streams Online All over the World.
> • Watch free live video streaming of sporting events online: football, soccer, NFL, hockey, basketball, tennis, baseball, UEFA Champions League, horse races, many sports.
>

• https://software.saliu.com/live-sports-streams.html

>
> Ion Saliu,
> Founder of Axiomatic Intelligence (AxI)
> “The unknown hides in plain sight on the path of the axiomatics.”

• https://saliu.com/gambling-lottery-lotto/prediction-science.htm

[speculator]

randomness? IT may appear that way for the uninitiated, but there is form within chaos..........just like Gleick says in his good book entitled the same, CHAOS

[Ion Saliu]

Additional topic for bettors, February I, MMXIX

• https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Do-you-prefer-sports-betting-or-horse-racing-If-both-which-has-been-the-most-successful-for-you
• Do you prefer sports betting or horse racing? If both, which has been the most successful for you?

[Ion Saliu]

• March IV, MMXIX

• https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sport.horse-racing/8GjZQHQd0nQ
• Spamming alt.sport.horse-racing to obfuscate Ion Saliu's writings.

[Ion Saliu]

The Horse Numbers Ranked by Frequency - By Position
Races Analyzed: 143 | 1875 - 2018
Frequency norms based on probabilities: 4.00%

Rank | Position 1 | Position 2 | Position 3 |
| Number Hits % | Number Hits % | Number Hits % |

1 | 1 23 16.08% | 5 23 16.08% | 3 23 16.08% |
2 | 4 17 11.89% | 1 20 13.99% | 2 17 11.89% |
3 | 3 14 9.79% | 3 14 9.79% | 7 13 9.09% |
4 | 8 14 9.79% | 7 13 9.09% | 5 12 8.39% |
5 | 7 12 8.39% | 2 12 8.39% | 9 12 8.39% |
6 | 2 11 7.69% | 4 10 6.99% | 1 11 7.69% |
7 | 6 11 7.69% | 10 10 6.99% | 4 10 6.99% |
8 | 5 8 5.59% | 8 7 4.90% | 8 9 6.29% |
9 | 10 7 4.90% | 6 7 4.90% | 6 9 6.29% |
10 | 11 7 4.90% | 13 6 4.20% | 10 8 5.59% |
11 | 9 4 2.80% | 12 5 3.50% | 12 6 4.20% |
12 | 16 4 2.80% | 9 4 2.80% | 16 4 2.80% |
13 | 14 2 1.40% | 11 4 2.80% | 14 3 2.10% |
14 | 15 2 1.40% | 18 2 1.40% | 11 3 2.10% |
15 | 13 2 1.40% | 19 2 1.40% | 15 1 0.70% |
16 | 12 1 0.70% | 17 1 0.70% | 13 1 0.70% |
17 | 18 1 0.70% | 14 1 0.70% | 17 1 0.70% |
18 | 19 1 0.70% | 16 1 0.70% | 18 0 0.00% |
19 | 20 1 0.70% | 22 1 0.70% | 19 0 0.00% |
20 | 25 1 0.70% | 20 0 0.00% | 20 0 0.00% |
21 | 17 0 0.00% | 25 0 0.00% | 25 0 0.00% |
22 | 21 0 0.00% | 21 0 0.00% | 21 0 0.00% |
23 | 22 0 0.00% | 15 0 0.00% | 22 0 0.00% |
24 | 23 0 0.00% | 23 0 0.00% | 23 0 0.00% |
25 | 24 0 0.00% | 24 0 0.00% | 24 0 0.00% |

• Horses wearing number 1 have recorded the most wins, due in great part to many races with few horses.
• Horse numbers with 0 hits in position 1 in the second report have never won the race.
• Among the regular 20 horse numbers, only #17 has not won as of 2018. • • Number 14 has not won in 68 years (2018). Horse #20 recorded the first win in 2008; #19 recorded the first win in 2012; #18 got the first win in 2015.

Source
• https://saliu.com/kentucky-derby-winners.html
• The Kentucky Derby: Results, Past Winning Horse Numbers Ranked by Wins.

[Ion Saliu]

Belmont Stakes Statistics by Horse Numbers

The Horse Numbers Ranked by Frequency - By Position

File: BelmontStakesResults
Drawings Analyzed: 116 | 1900 - 2018
Frequency norms based on probabilities: 7.14%

Rank | Position 1 | Position 2 | Position 3 |
| Number Hits % | Number Hits % | Number Hits % |

1 | 1 26 22.41% | 3 20 17.24% | 1 19 16.38% |
2 | 2 15 12.93% | 2 17 14.66% | 2 19 16.38% |
3 | 3 15 12.93% | 1 16 13.79% | 4 19 16.38% |
4 | 5 15 12.93% | 6 14 12.07% | 3 13 11.21% |
5 | 6 11 9.48% | 4 13 11.21% | 5 11 9.48% |
6 | 4 10 8.62% | 7 10 8.62% | 7 11 9.48% |
7 | 7 9 7.76% | 5 9 7.76% | 8 9 7.76% |
8 | 9 5 4.31% | 8 8 6.90% | 6 6 5.17% |
9 | 8 3 2.59% | 9 3 2.59% | 10 3 2.59% |
10 | 11 3 2.59% | 10 3 2.59% | 9 2 1.72% |
11 | 12 2 1.72% | 11 2 1.72% | 11 2 1.72% |
12 | 10 1 0.86% | 12 1 0.86% | 12 1 0.86% |
13 | 13 1 0.86% | 13 0 0.00% | 14 1 0.86% |
14 | 14 0 0.00% | 14 0 0.00% | 13 0 0.00% |

• Number 14 has never won a Belmont Stakes race (as of 2018).
• An interesting trifecta for 2019: Pay the median numbers 7-5-8

Source
• https://saliu.com/belmont-stakes-winners.html
• The Belmont Stakes: Results, Past Winning Horse Numbers Ranked by Wins.

[speculator]

At 12, furlongs post position means very little

[Ion Saliu]

Triple Crown Results as Trifectas — Year of Grace 2019

• Kentucky Derby
20 13 8

• Preakness Stakes
1 10 5

• Belmont Stakes
7 10 1

The degree of certainty (DC) is very low that the trifectas will repeat the following year — not even BOXED. The curious thing is that this year two of the Triple Crown races had trifectas with 2 common numbers (1 and 10 at Preakness and Belmont).

The way to play horse racing is based on randomness, not handicapping. Randomness hits more rarely, but the payouts are significantly larger. Handicapping wins more frequently, but the payouts lead to financial losses overall. Everybody can “foresee” the winner: The favorite. Many punters bet on favorites, but the faves do NOT win frequently enough to offset the house edge.

Another curious happening. Sometimes, but rarely, the payouts lead to overall profits when playing ALL possible outcomes. Take the 2019 Belmont Stakes payouts:

• $0.10 Superfecta 7-10-1-4 $1,042.80
• $0.50 Trifecta 7-10-1 $622.00

• Total possible superfectas for 10 horses: 5040
• Superfecta cost per $0.10: $504
• Profit superfecta: $538.80

• Total possible trifectas for 10 horses: 720
• Trifecta cost per $0.50: $360
• Profit trifecta: $262.00

The most profitable case happened at the 2005 Kentucky Derby.

Best of luck next time!

Ion Saliu,
Founder of Betting Mathematics
• https://saliu.com/horseracing.html
• Horse Racing: Betting, Systems, Software Based on Randomness

[Ion Saliu]

Up-to-the-date links always come by way of searching. The following searches lead to some of the best horse-racing resources:

• https://www.sitelevel.com/query?crid=4pah27vg&slice_title=Entire%20Site&query=Horse%20Racing%20Odds%2C%20Probability%2C%20Mathematics&page=4
• Horse Racing Odds, Probability, Mathematics.

• https://www.sitelevel.com/query?crid=4pah27vg&slice_title=Entire+Site&query=Horse+Racing+Wagering+Strategies%2C+Best+Systems
• Horse Racing Wagering Strategies, Best Systems.

• https://www.sitelevel.com/query?crid=4pah27vg&slice_title=Entire+Site&query=Horse+Racing+Software%2C+Programs
• Horse Racing Software, Programs.

• https://www.sitelevel.com/query?crid=4pah27vg&slice_title=Entire+Site&query=Horse+Number+Generator%2CRandom+Post-Position+Numbers
• Horse Number Generator: Random Post-Position Numbers.


Work in progress by
Ion Saliu,
Doctor in HorseBetteology
Founder of Horse-Racing Science, Mathematics, Philosophy, Programming
The Best Horse-Bettor Ever
• https://saliu.com/horses.html
• https://saliu.com/free-horse-racing.html

[Ion Saliu]

You can get lost easily in public forums like this Usenet group. THERE ARE WAY TOO MANY POSTS!!!

To solve the problem, I created this thread referring to the most relevant articles, materials, debates, systems, fights, etc. I keep it updated and make sure it shows at the top of this Google group, alt.sport.horse-racing.

For cross-reference, I also updated the most relevant and worthwhile threads to point to this very important resource.

Ion Saliu (royalty-name: Parpaluck),
Founder of Horse-racing Wagering Mathematics

[Ion Saliu]

On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:19:45 PM UTC+3, Ion Saliu wrote:
> Belmont Stakes Statistics by Horse Numbers - 2018

>
> The Horse Numbers Ranked by Frequency - By Position
> File: BelmontStakesResults
> Drawings Analyzed: 116 | 1900 - 2018
> Frequency norms based on probabilities: 7.14%
>

Axiomatics:

YES, there was a Triple Crown race in this extremely tested year of grace 2020: Belmont Stakes. I was late in publishing the results. But, hey, better late than never!

For best viewing, copy and paste the report in Notepad; better still, in the free text editor Notepad++.

The Horse Numbers Ranked by Frequency

File: BelmontStakesResults
Drawings Analyzed: 118 | 1900 - 2020
Frequency norm based on probability: 21.43%

Rank Number Hits Percentage

1 1 61 51.69%
2 2 49 41.53%
3 3 49 41.53%
4 4 42 35.59%
5 5 35 29.66%
6 6 31 26.27%
7 7 31 26.27%
8 8 21 17.80%
9 9 11 9.32%
10 10 8 6.78%
11 11 7 5.93%
12 12 4 3.39%
13 13 1 0.85%
14 14 1 0.85%

The Horse Numbers Ranked by Frequency - By Position
File: BelmontStakesResults

Drawings Analyzed: 118 | 1900 - 2020

Frequency norms based on probabilities: 7.14%

Rank Position 1 Position 2 Position 3
Number Hits % Number Hits % Number Hits %

1 1 26 22.03% 3 20 16.95% 1 20 16.95%
2 2 15 12.71% 2 17 14.41% 2 19 16.10%
3 3 15 12.71% 1 16 13.56% 4 19 16.10%
4 5 15 12.71% 6 14 11.86% 3 14 11.86%
5 6 11 9.32% 4 13 11.02% 5 11 9.32%
6 4 10 8.47% 7 10 8.47% 7 11 9.32%
7 7 10 8.47% 5 9 7.63% 8 9 7.63%
8 9 5 4.24% 8 8 6.78% 6 6 5.08%
9 8 4 3.39% 9 4 3.39% 10 3 2.54%
10 11 3 2.54% 10 4 3.39% 9 2 1.69%
11 12 2 1.69% 11 2 1.69% 11 2 1.69%
12 10 1 0.85% 12 1 0.85% 12 1 0.85%
13 13 1 0.85% 13 0 0.00% 14 1 0.85%

14 14 0 0.00% 14 0 0.00% 13 0 0.00%

"I received a phone call
From one who claimed was tall.
Then, he cursed me even worse
For my gambling on the horse."
3:14

The entire history of Belmont Stakes can be freely accessed:

• https://saliu.com/belmont-stakes-winners.html
"Analyze Belmont Stakes past results, the entire history of winning horse numbers by postpositions PPs, ranked from the best to the worst numbers."

[Ion Saliu]

> • https://forums.saliu.com/triple-crown-horse-racing.html
> • Results, Winning Horse Numbers in Triple Crown Races: Kentucky Derby, Preakness Stakes, Belmont Stakes.

Watch — or watch again — the “first” Triple Crown race in 2020, won in a dominant manner by ‘Tiz the Law’:

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrSNRLgNFsc
• Belmont Stakes 2020 (FULL RACE) | NBC Sports

[Ion Saliu]

Axiomatics:

The Kentucky Derby 2020 followed the Belmont Stakes this year. Here are the results:

18 17 9

Two statistical reports for the entire history of the Kentucky Derby follow. For best viewing, copy and paste the report in Notepad; better still, in the free text editor Notepad++.

The Horse Numbers Ranked by Frequency

File: KentuckyDerbyResults
Drawings Analyzed: 145 | 1875 - 2020
Frequency norm based on probability: 12.00%

Rank Number Hits Percentage

1 1 54 37.24%
2 3 51 35.17%
3 5 43 29.66%
4 2 40 27.59%
5 7 38 26.21%
6 4 37 25.52%
7 8 31 21.38%
8 6 27 18.62%
9 10 25 17.24%
10 9 21 14.48%
11 11 14 9.66%
12 12 12 8.28%
13 13 10 6.90%
14 16 9 6.21%
15 14 6 4.14%
16 18 4 2.76%
17 17 3 2.07%
18 15 3 2.07%
19 19 3 2.07%
20 20 2 1.38%
21 22 1 0.69%
22 25 1 0.69%
23 23 0 0.00%
24 24 0 0.00%
25 21 0 0.00%

The Horse Numbers Ranked by Frequency - By Position

File: KentuckyDerbyResults
Drawings Analyzed: 145 | 1875 - 2020
Frequency norms based on probabilities: 4.00%

Rank Position 1 Position 2 Position 3
Number Hits % Number Hits % Number Hits %

1 1 23 15.86% 5 23 15.86% 3 23 15.86%
2 4 17 11.72% 1 20 13.79% 2 17 11.72%
3 3 14 9.66% 3 14 9.66% 7 13 8.97%
4 8 14 9.66% 7 13 8.97% 9 13 8.97%
5 7 12 8.28% 2 12 8.28% 5 12 8.28%
6 2 11 7.59% 4 10 6.90% 1 11 7.59%
7 6 11 7.59% 10 10 6.90% 8 10 6.90%
8 5 8 5.52% 8 7 4.83% 4 10 6.90%
9 10 7 4.83% 6 7 4.83% 6 9 6.21%
10 11 7 4.83% 13 7 4.83% 10 8 5.52%
11 9 4 2.76% 12 5 3.45% 12 6 4.14%
12 16 4 2.76% 9 4 2.76% 16 4 2.76%
13 14 2 1.38% 11 4 2.76% 14 3 2.07%
14 15 2 1.38% 17 2 1.38% 11 3 2.07%
15 13 2 1.38% 18 2 1.38% 15 1 0.69%
16 18 2 1.38% 19 2 1.38% 13 1 0.69%
17 20 2 1.38% 16 1 0.69% 17 1 0.69%
18 19 1 0.69% 14 1 0.69% 18 0 0.00%
19 12 1 0.69% 22 1 0.69% 19 0 0.00%
20 25 1 0.69% 20 0 0.00% 20 0 0.00%
21 21 0 0.00% 21 0 0.00% 21 0 0.00%
22 22 0 0.00% 15 0 0.00% 22 0 0.00%
23 23 0 0.00% 23 0 0.00% 23 0 0.00%
24 24 0 0.00% 24 0 0.00% 24 0 0.00%
25 17 0 0.00% 25 0 0.00% 25 0 0.00%

The entire history of the Kentucky Derby can be freely accessed:

• https://saliu.com/kentucky-derby-winners.html
"Analysis of the Kentucky Derby past results, entire history of winning horse numbers by post positions PPs, ranked from the best to the worst numbers."


Watch the replay of the Kentucky Derby 2020 on YouTube:
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf0TSBtnPOs

[TPayne]

On 12/18/2017 4:59 PM, ions...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> The software apps, strategies, systems, tips presented here deal with horse racing from two perspectives:
>
> 1) A form of digit lottery –
> • pick-3 (i.e. trifectas)
> • pick-4 (i.e. superfectas)
>
> 2) A form of sports betting –
> • record the streaks and increase the bet accordingly.
>
> 1) The horses receive numbers, very much like in a pick-3 or pick-4 lottery. Usually the horse numbers represent the post positions. It is a mathematical fact that every pick-3, pick 4, digit lottery number has a repeat cycle based on the Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG).
>
> For example, in 51% of the wins, an individual pick-3 digit repeats after 3 draws. This tip is also true for a horse race consisting of 10 horses. This represents one simple, the simplest winning system at horse racing in the manner of the pick-3 digit lottery.
>
> Look at this simple but undeniable pick-3 idea. You only look at the last 3 races in your of the respective track. You choose at random any 3 unique numbers (representing horses). The winning probability increases almost 5 times. (0.51 / 3) ^ 3 = 0.0049 or '1 in 204'.
>

> There is a lot to this theory, so the best start would be:
>

> http://saliu.com/horses.html
> “Win at horse races with betting systems for trifectas, superfectas, exactas. Mathematics creates strategies, winning systems, horse racing betting software.”

>
> 2) Take a look at the simplest horse wagering strategy known as the ‘Logical System’:
>

> http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/649.html
> “The Logical System is a free betting strategy to play at any horse tracks with a modest bankroll. The horse betting systems rely on favorites winning 33% of races.”

>
> 3) How about the software? There is plenty of that… dozens of programs and apps! All applications are available for download from this location:
>

> http://saliu.com/free-horse-racing.html
> “The best software download site in the world, loaded with software for horse racing, trifectas, superfectas, horse bet systems, wagering strategies.”

>
> The two types of software are presented generously in dedicated eBooks:
>

> http://saliu.com/horseracing-software.html
> “The best horse racing software for generating trifectas is Bright: A collection of powerful programs for betting, wagering, winning at race tracks or online.”
>
> http://saliu.com/ultimate-horse-software.html

> “Ultimate Trifecta is the best software for any horse races, where the horses have numbers by post positions, from 1 to 8, 9, 10, 12, 20.”
>
> Best of luck, axiomatics!
>
> Ion Saliu (royalty name: Parpaluck)
> Founder of Equestrian Mathematics
> The Best Horse Bettor in History
>

"Doctor of Horse Racing Bullshit!"

[Ion Saliu]

Ce-ai ba, mielu turbat al lu Mnezau si Sant Ketru? What's with you, rabid lamb of God and Saint Keter? You were hit by COVID-19, or a novel equestrian flu?

What I post here has great value to all sane members of the community. It ain't the one-line horsecrap the likes of you post obsessively in public places.

Ce-ai ba, curule? What's with you, cur... horseshit?

[TPayne]

What's up with me is quite simple ... even simple enough for the likes
of you to understand.

You post endless bullshit about your understanding and prowess regarding
the racing game, but have yet to post one single iota of any evidence
that ANY of your bullshit methods can produce the one thing every
horseplayer covets ... PROFIT.

So again I challenge you. Show a week or two at any track anywhere,
anytime, where any of your nonsense has produced PROFIT, and is therefor
even worth reading. Or you can continue posting because you enjoy
seeing your name in print. Your choice.

[Ion Saliu]

On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 at 12:41:53 AM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:

>
> What's up with me is quite simple ... even simple enough for the likes
> of you to understand.
>
> You post endless bullshit about your understanding and prowess regarding
> the racing game, but have yet to post one single iota of any evidence
> that ANY of your bullshit methods can produce the one thing every
> horseplayer covets ... PROFIT.
>
> So again I challenge you. Show a week or two at any track anywhere,
> anytime, where any of your nonsense has produced PROFIT, and is therefor
> even worth reading. Or you can continue posting because you enjoy
> seeing your name in print. Your choice.

Ah, the stupidiot advanced to multiple-sentence discourse! Haw payneful was that?

How about your track records? Near nil, for sure. In fact, payneful losses.

In my case, you should be able to understand something from my writings and software. After all, you advanced somehow as a stupidiot! Start with a few pages… there will be a dozen more to follow up.

• https://saliu.com/horses.html
• https://saliu.com/horseracing.html
• https://saliu.com/horseracing-stats.html
• https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/662.html
• “Better Betting Methods to Play Horse Racing”

Even members of my site expressed playable and profitable betting systems:
• https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/649.html
• “The LOGICAL Horse Racing System.

How about your horsecrap, huh?

[TPayne]

You must truly be a moron to not understand what I am asking. All you
really are is a master of deflection. But I'll give you one last chance
... pay attention:

You pick the track, pick any 2 week period, and show everyone ACTUAL
PROFITABLE RESULTS, not links to all your nonsense.

Results, or more endless bullshit, your choice. Last chance!

[Ion Saliu]

On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 12:05:47 AM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:
>
> You must truly be a moron to not understand what I am asking. All you
> really are is a master of deflection. But I'll give you one last chance
> ... pay attention:
>
> You pick the track, pick any 2 week period, and show everyone ACTUAL
> PROFITABLE RESULTS, not links to all your nonsense.
>
> Results, or more endless bullshit, your choice. Last chance!

What tracks, stupidiot? I do not gamble online ‘cuz they are big-time robbers. And I stay away from OTWs or betting outlets (brick-and-mortar). I am very cautious since this COVID-19 (that apparently disturbed your brains!)

If you have favorite tracks, just put my theories and software to work. You need the results as numbers, not horse names. You need also a MIND!

Otherwise, you just developed a dangerous form of obsession with me. Jealousy will only deteriorate your brains further.

Publishing my plays hurt me once. The trifecta payouts dropped dramatically, as many bettors played the same numbers.

• https://saliu.com/generosity.html
• “Generosity and Stupidity: Sharing Strategy, Systems, Gambling, Lottery, Lotto, Horse Racing”

[TPayne]

Discussion officially ended. Bullshitter refuses to comply with request.

[Ion Saliu]

Only insane krooks ask for the publishing of betting tips, lottery numbers, roulette numbers, etc. The deception is so easy to spot: It stinks. They claim they only want to see how gambling systems, or lottery systems, or horse racing systems, work. “Show me proofs,” they mouth-foam.

You are very likely one of those skumbullows who keep asking me via email to send them direct predictions for horse races of their choices. As late as August this year, two requests came from Down Under. Only insane krooks believe another person has the Infinite time of the Universe to satisfy such requests.

Put your predictions in this forum and see what the results are1 Disastrous, that is! Or else consume your last breaths in mouth-foaming desperation…

[TPayne]

On 9/9/2020 11:17 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

blah, blah, blah.

[Ion Saliu]

You can’t control your obsession with me. You signed up in this forum for the sole purpose of attacking me. No doubt, you are either:

1) An insane krook who is involved in one of my fields — and is incapable of matching my feats
2) Just an insane krook who can’t control obsessive hatred.

Typical of another one-line hater who developed a similar compulsive obsession with me: Norman “Shkiottorban” Wattenberger:

• https://saliu.com/gambling-fights.html

Others on the infamous list:

• Mike “Lizard of Odss” Shakleford
• Don “Raging Bull” Schlesinger
• Duncan “Kotskarr” Smith
• Gizmotron “Cabron”
• Marcus “Druggy Monkey” Dalton
• “Driveling Yak” Nan

Skums of two screaming bitches and three krazed dawgs — one without an eye, one without and ear, one without a tail!

[TPayne]

Please continue posting your drivel so that anyone remaining in this
newsgroup can confirm for themselves what a phoney you are.

[Ion Saliu]

What a maniac you are! A compulsive-obsessive krook who can’t control his hatred toward yours truly! You enter here only to attack me — probably because you “think” I outclass you in the field of equestrian-mathematics. Your “handicapping” infesting public places.

Nobody forced to read my stuff. You just invaded ‘cuz you can’t stop your mouth-foaming urges. You are a medical case, cuckoo. Sane people simply stay away from places they don’t like when nobody forces them in.

I don’t care about your crap. I don’t invade your stinky place. I only read your posts only because you attacked me. You won’t get away with crime, venomous spider! Your cowardly attacks must, and will be, dealt with accordingly. You coward are afraid to even sign with your real name.

Stay in your sty, cochiloco! Nobody will bother you…

Ion Saliu (royalty name: Parpaluck)
Founder of Equestrian Mathematics
The Best Horse Bettor in History

• https://saliu.com/TV-ratings.html
• “They shoot the horses, don't they?”

[TPayne]

>>
>> Please continue posting your drivel so that anyone remaining in this
>> newsgroup can confirm for themselves what a phoney you are.
>
> What a maniac you are! A compulsive-obsessive krook who can’t control his hatred toward yours truly! You enter here only to attack me — probably because you “think” I outclass you in the field of equestrian-mathematics. Your “handicapping” infesting public places.
>
> Nobody forced to read my stuff. You just invaded ‘cuz you can’t stop your mouth-foaming urges. You are a medical case, cuckoo. Sane people simply stay away from places they don’t like when nobody forces them in.
>
> I don’t care about your crap. I don’t invade your stinky place. I only read your posts only because you attacked me. You won’t get away with crime, venomous spider! Your cowardly attacks must, and will be, dealt with accordingly. You coward are afraid to even sign with your real name.
>
> Stay in your sty, cochiloco! Nobody will bother you…

>

And Ion Salu retreats, while we wait breathlessly for his next bushel of
bullshit.

[Ion Saliu]

You ran out of medicines, maniakal druggy-monkey? In less than two weeks? Or your doktors were hit by COVID-19 and need to take care of themselves first? Or your pigshit piled up to the roof of your previous sty and now moved to a new one?

It ain’t “we” here — it’s only you. Even Spotrocheeller (aka speculator, your love-hate konkubine) ain’t with you anymore. Stay in your sty, narcochiloco!

[al]

I think you should change your name to "Babbles", because you do that so
well.

[TPayne]

On 9/24/2020 7:53 AM, al wrote:
> On 9/22/2020 7:59 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

blah blah

>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> And Ion Salu retreats, while we wait breathlessly for his next bushel of
>>> bullshit.
>>
>> You ran out of medicines, maniakal druggy-monkey? In less than two
>> weeks? Or your doktors were hit by COVID-19 and need to take care of
>> themselves first? Or your pigshit piled up to the roof of your
>> previous sty and now moved to a new one?
>>
>> It ain’t “we” here — it’s only you. Even Spotrocheeller (aka
>> speculator, your love-hate konkubine) ain’t with you anymore. Stay in
>> your sty, narcochiloco!
>>
>
> I think you should change your name to "Babbles", because you do that so
> well.

Hey "al" this is a discussion between ion salu and me. We don't need
your help!!

[Mr. G]

On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:55:59 UTC, TPayne <tp...@nr.net> wrote:

> On 9/24/2020 7:53 AM, al wrote:
> > On 9/22/2020 7:59 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:
>
> blah blah
>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> And Ion Salu retreats, while we wait breathlessly for his next bushel of
> >>> bullshit.
> >>
> >> You ran out of medicines, maniakal druggy-monkey? In less than two
> >> weeks? Or your doktors were hit by COVID-19 and need to take care of
> >> themselves first? Or your pigshit piled up to the roof of your
> >> previous sty and now moved to a new one?
> >>

> >> It ainƒÕÍt ƒÕúweƒÕ± here ƒÕ÷ itƒÕÍs only you. Even Spotrocheeller (aka
> >> speculator, your love-hate konkubine) ainƒÕÍt with you anymore. Stay in

> >> your sty, narcochiloco!
> >>
> >
> > I think you should change your name to "Babbles", because you do that so
> > well.
>
>
> Hey "al" this is a discussion between ion salu and me. We don't need
> your help!!

And yet, you choose to have this "discussion" in a public forum. Go figure!


--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

[Ion Saliu]

On Thursday, September 24, 2020 at 8:53:56 PM UTC+3, Mr. G wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:55:59 UTC, TPayne <tp...@nr.net> wrote:
>
>
> And yet, you choose to have this "discussion" in a public forum. Go figure!
>
>

What “discussion”, narcochiloco? This is NOT a discussion. You keep breaking in here — first, attacking me viciously, now attempting to have “the last word”. Only afflicted krooks live and die by “the last word in a public forum”.

This is my public place, stupidiot. I started the thread. Everybody has a right to enter and even participate. But attacking me is a no-no. I’ll make sure you end up in that iGrave of iPsychosis. Like the likes of Psychosama, Zamzallasheep, Bullbooyak et.al.

[TPayne]

I humbly apologize to Ion Salu and Mr. G., and everyone else who is
still reading this newsgroup. EVERYONE is indeed welcome to read and
opine about Ion Salu's posted crap and his dreams of grandeur! Or...
perhaps post about how brilliant you think he is. The group is, after
all, a public forum!

[Mr. G]

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:21:52 UTC, Ion Saliu <ions...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, September 24, 2020 at 8:53:56 PM UTC+3, Mr. G wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:55:59 UTC, TPayne <tp...@nr.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > And yet, you choose to have this "discussion" in a public forum. Go figure!
> >
> >
>

> What ƒÕúdiscussionƒÕ±, narcochiloco? This is NOT a discussion. You keep breaking in here ƒÕ÷ first,
> attacking me viciously, now attempting to have ƒÕúthe last wordƒÕ±. Only afflicted krooks live and
> die by ƒÕúthe last word in a public forumƒÕ±.

>
> This is my public place, stupidiot. I started the thread. Everybody has a right to enter and even

> participate. But attacking me is a no-no. IƒÕÍll make sure you end up in that iGrave of iPsychosis.

> Like the likes of Psychosama, Zamzallasheep, Bullbooyak et.al.
>
> Stay in your sty, narcochiloco!
>
>
>

Interesting...last time I posted anything to you was in early 2019. How is that "keep breaking in here"
"attempting to have the last word"...surely you jest. And as for attacking you viciously, you don't really
want me to start attacking you. You would like it even less than the beating you're already receiving.

Obviously, you've mistaken me for someone else, as my last post only stated a fact. You've been
challenged to prove your methods, now it's time either to put up or shut up!

'I'll make sure you end up in that iGrave of iPsychosis." With that threat I say BRING IT ON!

[Ion Saliu]

On Friday, September 25, 2020 at 5:37:00 PM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:
>
> I humbly apologize to Ion Salu and Mr. G., and everyone else who is
> still reading this newsgroup. EVERYONE is indeed welcome to read and
> opine about Ion Salu's posted crap and his dreams of grandeur! Or...
> perhaps post about how brilliant you think he is. The group is, after
> all, a public forum!

Narcochiloco:

“Crap”, huh? Speak for yourself, krook. “Sty real-estate master”, as in (your?) “nr.net” “agency”? Take care of selling your pigcrap, narcochiloco! You may do so with “grandeur”!

[Ion Saliu]

Gogostarg:

Read carefully! I replied to Narcochiloco, not you.

“Hey "al" this is a discussion between ion salu and me. We don't need your help!!”

Pull your head out that barrel of whiskey!

[Mr. G]

On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:38:29 UTC, Ion Saliu <ions...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Friday, September 25, 2020 at 8:49:20 PM UTC+3, Mr. G wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:21:52 UTC, Ion Saliu <ions...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, September 24, 2020 at 8:53:56 PM UTC+3, Mr. G wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:55:59 UTC, TPayne <tp...@nr.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And yet, you choose to have this "discussion" in a public forum. Go figure!
> > > >
> > > >
> > >

> > > What ’ÊÇòǧdiscussion’ÊÇò¶ñ, narcochiloco? This is NOT a discussion. You keep breaking in here ’ÊÇòÇÀ first,
> > > attacking me viciously, now attempting to have ’ÊÇòǧthe last word’ÊÇò¶ñ. Only afflicted krooks live and
> > > die by ’ÊÇòǧthe last word in a public forum’ÊÇò¶ñ.

> > >
> > > This is my public place, stupidiot. I started the thread. Everybody has a right to enter and even

> > > participate. But attacking me is a no-no. I’ÊÇòDzll make sure you end up in that iGrave of iPsychosis.

> > > Like the likes of Psychosama, Zamzallasheep, Bullbooyak et.al.
> > >
> > > Stay in your sty, narcochiloco!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Interesting...last time I posted anything to you was in early 2019. How is that "keep breaking in here"
> > "attempting to have the last word"...surely you jest. And as for attacking you viciously, you don't really
> > want me to start attacking you. You would like it even less than the beating you're already receiving.
> >
> > Obviously, you've mistaken me for someone else, as my last post only stated a fact. You've been
> > challenged to prove your methods, now it's time either to put up or shut up!
> >
> > 'I'll make sure you end up in that iGrave of iPsychosis." With that threat I say BRING IT ON!
> >
> >
> Gogostarg:
>
> Read carefully! I replied to Narcochiloco, not you.
>

> ƒÕúHey "al" this is a discussion between ion salu and me. We don't need your help!!ƒÕ±

>
> Pull your head out that barrel of whiskey!

You attached your reply to MY post. What am I supposed think except it was meant for me.

[Ion Saliu]

The Preakness Stakes 2020 was the last triple Crown race this year due to COVID-19. Here are the results, in the form of the winning trifecta:

4 9 6

Two statistical reports for a partial history of the Preakness Stakes follow. For best viewing, copy and paste the report in Notepad; better still, in the free text editor Notepad++.

The Horse Numbers Ranked by Frequency

File: PreaknessStakesResults
Drawings Analyzed: 33 | 1988 - 2020
Frequency norm based on probability: 21.43%

Rank Number Hits Percentage

1 7 12 36.36%
2 6 11 33.33%
3 3 10 30.30%
4 5 10 30.30%
5 8 9 27.27%
6 1 8 24.24%
7 4 8 24.24%
8 2 7 21.21%
9 9 6 18.18%
10 10 6 18.18%
11 11 6 18.18%
12 12 4 12.12%
13 13 2 6.06%
14 14 0 0.00%

The Horse Numbers Ranked by Frequency - By Position

File: PreaknessStakesResults
Drawings Analyzed: 33 | 1988 - 2020
Frequency norms based on probabilities: 7.69%

Rank Position 1 Position 2 Position 3
Number Hits % Number Hits % Number Hits %

1 4 6 18.18% 10 5 15.15% 3 6 18.18%
2 7 6 18.18% 7 4 12.12% 6 5 15.15%
3 6 4 12.12% 5 4 12.12% 5 4 12.12%
4 8 3 9.09% 2 3 9.09% 8 4 12.12%
5 5 2 6.06% 1 3 9.09% 1 3 9.09%
6 2 2 6.06% 11 3 9.09% 7 2 6.06%
7 3 2 6.06% 8 2 6.06% 2 2 6.06%
8 1 2 6.06% 9 2 6.06% 9 2 6.06%
9 9 2 6.06% 6 2 6.06% 4 1 3.03%
10 11 2 6.06% 3 2 6.06% 10 1 3.03%
11 12 1 3.03% 12 2 6.06% 11 1 3.03%
12 13 1 3.03% 4 1 3.03% 12 1 3.03%
13 10 0 0.00% 13 0 0.00% 13 1 3.03%
14 14 0 0.00% 14 0 0.00% 14 0 0.00%

The entire history of the Preakness Stakes can be freely accessed:

• https://saliu.com/preakness-stakes-winners.html
"Analysis of the Preakness Stakes past results, entire history of winning horse numbers by post positions PPs, ranked from the best to the worst numbers."


The filly, Swiss Skydiver, wins it in a photo finish! Watch the replay of the Preakness Stakes 2020:
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTPXlSXVWbw

[Ion Saliu]

The new Google Groups imposed today are HORRIBLE! Change for change’s sake! Shit on you, stupidiots!

[Ion Saliu]

On Friday, November 13, 2020 at 12:20:51 PM UTC+2, Ion Saliu wrote:
> The new Google Groups imposed today are HORRIBLE! Change for change’s sake! Shit on you, stupidiots!

Axiomatics:

Google swallowed Deja News and created Google Groups. Deja News was a wonder even during the primitive era of the Internet (1990s). Google Groups was a decent platform, up until this November, 2020, Friday the 13th.

Frankly, I’ve been shocked Google Groups lasted this long! Google is notorious for:

a) Offering services
b) Changing the offerings — always change for the worse
c) Cancelling/discontinuing the offerings.

So, Google Groups reached the second phase: change for the worse. Logically, the cancellation of the service is to be expected.

Google has offered and then discontinued over 25 services in their short life. No company has survived such miserable behavior. But, hey, think how Donald Caligula Trump succeeded in becoming Prez… and lasting 4 years!

• https://saliu.com/google-search-google-shit.html
• “Google Search, Google Shit – An Internet Anthem”

• https://saliu.com/google-penguin-update.html
• “DracGoogla: Google Devilish Search Updates”

[TPayne]

Don't you ever get tired of posting your bullshit and spam in every
available group? And will you EVER publish evidence of your expertise
as I have requested time and time again?

I anxiously await your non-answers, Beelzebub.

[Ion Saliu]

Stay away from drugs, narcochiloco! They can only aggravate... further... your obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)!

Only decrepit OCD-afflicts will ask for "real-life proofs" ad nauseam. Sane persons do not have that much time to waste. The systems, theories, software apps are there for studying, analyzing, running, and testing. Proving is on users — in their own available times, at their own leisure.

Do you own proving, druggy-monkey! But only after taking your meds…

[TPayne]

As we all thought, a non-answer from King Bullshit.

[Ion Saliu]

On Sunday, November 15, 2020 at 6:06:13 PM UTC+2, TPayne wrote:

> As we all thought, a non-answer from King Bullshit.

“we all”
Something additional now: “We” as in multiple-personality disorder” (MPD)!
There ain’t no “we”, Narcochiloco! It’s just ‘you”, the lonely pig in that stinky pigsty!

It must be even the veterinaries are busy-busy with the COVID thingy. You can’t go anywhere for professional help. Sadly, there is one path only for you: the iGraveyard of iPsychosis...

• https://saliu.com/horses.html
• The ‘pick-3 lottery’ method applied to horse betting.

[TPayne]

We, or me, makes no difference at all. What IS important is that you
are a psycho bullshit artist who has time and again not offered any
proof whatsoever that his constant repetition of nonsense is worth a
damn. Begone Beelzebub!!

[Ion Saliu]

On Monday, November 16, 2020 at 6:08:15 PM UTC+2, TPayne wrote:

> We, or me, makes no difference at all. What IS important is that you
> are a psycho bullshit artist who has time and again not offered any
> proof whatsoever that his constant repetition of nonsense is worth a
> damn. Begone Beelzebub!!

It’s only you Narcochiloco, consumed by that obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)! There ain’t no “we”. Only a negligible fraction of people are that insane — asking other people for “proofs”. Sane people just manage their limited time without the burden of “proof”. Not even narcochilocos are required the “burden of proof”.

Sadly, there is one path only for you: the iGraveyard of iPsychosis. Skum of two screaming bitches and three krazed dawgs — one without an eye, one without an ear, one without a tail!

• https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/662.html
• The Best Methods, Betting Systems, Software to Wager at Horse Racing Tracks.

• https://saliu.com/horses.html
• The ‘pick-3 lottery’ method applied to horse betting — paper-and-pencil.

• https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/649.html
• The LOGIC System: Free Horse Racing Betting System.

[TPayne]

Keep talking, Moron. As you blabber, the few of us remaining in this
newsgroup will, IMHO, be presented with even more evidence of how your
warped ego has destroyed your brain ... and how YOU have destroyed this
newsgroup. Begone Beelzebub!

[al]

Looks like I'm not the only one calling out Beelzebub's bullshit...
https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/questions-for-ion-saliu-saliu-com-gambling-system-seller.16545/

[Ion Saliu]

Narcochiloco:

You are so insane you don’t even realize it’s *you* who keeps talking. Like the cur to the moon!

This is *my* thread — and you keep it alive and kicking! And you also get the *cooperation* of another character of your MPD (multiple psychopersonality disorder).

Every *sane* person can simply disregard a thread/post/author they dislike. It’s so easy: put it on the *ignore list*. I viewed a couple of your “posts” — exercises in idiocy. I ignore your posts now — except when you barge in my house (a thread like this).

I declared your place as a pigsty — and stay away from it. The same truth about the MPDs — the *als* of the world. I stay away from your stinky places. I never go there in the manner of OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder) as you do.

• https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/778.html
• Horse Racing: Betting Information, Systems, Tips

• https://saliu.com/horseracing-stats.html
• Horse Racing Stats: The Best, Most Common Winning Horse Numbers, Triple Crown History.

I offer useful information, curs and MPDs and OCDs… unlike your drivelling one-liner mumbo-jumbo…

[TPayne]

You offer only bullshit. Ramblings with no scrutiny, no proof. Fraud.
Moron. Charlatan. Huckster. Did I mention Bullshitter?

[Ion Saliu]

On Saturday, November 21, 2020 at 2:28:12 PM UTC+2, TPayne wrote:
>
> You offer only bullshit. Ramblings with no scrutiny, no proof. Fraud.
> Moron. Charlatan. Huckster. Did I mention Bullshitter?

Narcochiloco:

My creations and offerings! That’s what makes you “feel like dying through the weeping floor”. The more I post about them, the more people find out about them — the more masochistic pain strikes you! Indeed, the resources I have promoted here have gained more visitors, more interest.

You can do the same, ‘corchiloco’. I won't stop you. Problem is, you aint’ got nothing to offer… just one-liner idiocy in hundreds of posts here (and probably elsewhere). A sane person simply ignores you after seeing what you are “capable” of. I’ve done it, and every sane person has done it.

Your OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder), on the other hand, can’t stop you from frying your brains. Yes, you do feel the masochistic pain caused by my justified responses. Yet, you keep coming back for more devastating kicks in your stinky arse. I can’t help it. You’ll “enjoy” such treatment as all bullboochas have: Till dropping in that iGrave of iPsychosis.

"I received a phone call
From one who claimed was tall.
Then, he cursed me even worse
For my gambling on the horse."

A close case, as this psychotic Narcochiloco’s:

• https://saliu.com/gambling-fights.html

[Ion Saliu]

• https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sport.horse-racing/c/TVJ0hF6y5SQ
• Usenet, RSS — The Pioneers Are Alive and Kicking

[Ion Saliu]

Search-engine programming advanced with rapid paces. Now, they can interact with Netizens almost like human beings. There are AI chatbots that behave in the manner of human researchers. I tested two AI chatbots on ‘Ion Saliu’ and ‘horse racing betting wagering’.

• https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sport.horse-racing/c/wW1bIA-NY0A
• Artificial Intelligence, Horse Betting Prediction: Chatbots, Ion Saliu.

[Ion Saliu]

There is a new useful feature for reading the Usenet posts in Google Groups. The vast majority of newsgroup members use GROUPS.GOOGLE.COM to post and read on the Internet pioneering service, Usenet.

One drawback of the Google service, very useful otherwise, is the default font. It is a proportional font (of variable-width, that is). However, initially Usenet was written and shown in a monospace font.

It is quite easy and simple to add this useful feature to two of your browsers: Chrome and Firefox. Just read this axiomatic thread:

• https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sport.horse-racing/c/WLKpjk-uv1c?hl=en
• Usenet Redivivus! Best Post Viewing in Google Groups

[Ion Saliu]

Any time 1000 views are reached represents a landmark or a milestone. This is extraordinary!

Too bad, Google Groups will end come February 22, 2024. It was great community, characterized by convenience…

Read the whole sad story:
• https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.soccer/c/1CIIgAWyhIY/m/_TVXVCwUAQAJ
• Google Groups to cut off Usenet