How Jews manipulated the World Almanac and continue to do so to this day
RamBam
The 1940 World Almanac gives the world Jewish population as 15,319,359,
while the
1948 World Almanac gives the world Jewish population as 15,713,638.
The World Almanac volumes from 1945 to 1949[53][54][55][56] present
two sets of figures for the world Jewish population,
one attributed to the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and
the other under the Almanac's own responsibility.
The set from the AJC makes clear they use figures
from 1938, "the last available data".
Until 1949, the two sets of figures were very similar. But in 1949, the
World Almanac gives the
world Jewish population as 15,713,638,[57] while the AJC number in the
same volume (but for 1947) was 11,266,600. Moreover, the AJC
revised its estimate of the world Jewish population in 1939 upward, to
16,643,120.
Thus, according to the AJC in the 1949 World Almanac, the
difference between the pre and post war populations is over 5.4
million. Subsequent years of the Almanac discontinued all reporting of
populations for all religions worldwide, while continuing to carry the
AJC's numbers regarding the world Jewish population.
drahcir
> The 1940 World Almanac gives the world Jewish population as 15,319,359,
NO IT DOESN'T
> while the
> 1948 World Almanac gives the world Jewish population as 15,713,638.
NO IT DOESN'T
>
> The World Almanac volumes from 1945 to 1949[53][54][55][56] present
> two sets of figures for the world Jewish population,
NO THEY DON'T
>
> one attributed to the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and
>
> the other under the Almanac's own responsibility.
>
> The set from the AJC makes clear they use figures
> from 1938, "the last available data".
NO IT DOESN'T
>
> Until 1949, the two sets of figures were very similar. But in 1949, the
> World Almanac gives the
> world Jewish population as 15,713,638,[57] while the AJC number in the
> same volume (but for 1947) was 11,266,600.
NO IT WASN'T
Moreover, the AJC
> revised its estimate of the world Jewish population in 1939 upward, to
> 16,643,120.
NO IT DIDN'T
>
> Thus, according to the AJC in the 1949 World Almanac, the
> difference between the pre and post war populations is over 5.4
> million.
NO IT'S NOT
Subsequent years of the Almanac discontinued all reporting of
> populations for all religions worldwide, while continuing to carry the
> AJC's numbers regarding the world Jewish population.
NO THEY DIDN'T
see how easy it is to refute uncited crap? your turn....
Abe Safron
"drahcir" <justrich...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6a405e94-5982-422e...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 10, 7:27 pm, "RamBam" <bama...@internot.net> wrote:
>> The 1940 World Almanac gives the world Jewish population as 15,319,359,
>NO IT DOESN'T
Yes it does
>> while the
>> 1948 World Almanac gives the world Jewish population as 15,713,638.
>NO IT DOESN'T
Yes it does
>>
>> The World Almanac volumes from 1945 to 1949[53][54][55][56] present
>> two sets of figures for the world Jewish population,
>NO THEY DON'T
Yes they do.
>>
>> one attributed to the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and
>>
>> the other under the Almanac's own responsibility.
>>
>> The set from the AJC makes clear they use figures
>> from 1938, "the last available data".
>NO IT DOESN'T
It most certainly does.
>>
>> Until 1949, the two sets of figures were very similar. But in 1949, the
>> World Almanac gives the
>> world Jewish population as 15,713,638,[57] while the AJC number in the
>> same volume (but for 1947) was 11,266,600.
>NO IT WASN'T
Yes it was.
>>Moreover, the AJC
>> revised its estimate of the world Jewish population in 1939 upward, to
>> 16,643,120.
>NO IT DIDN'T
But it did. By its own admission
>>
>> Thus, according to the AJC in the 1949 World Almanac, the
>> difference between the pre and post war populations is over 5.4
>> million.
>NO IT'S NOT
Yes it is.
>>Subsequent years of the Almanac discontinued all reporting of
>> populations for all religions worldwide, while continuing to carry the
>> AJC's numbers regarding the world Jewish population.
>NO THEY DIDN'T
Yes they did.
>see how easy it is to refute uncited crap? your turn....
You have refuted nothing. You have lied and whines. As Jews do.
The information in RamBam's post was so interesting I did a little
investigation. He's right. The Almanace do indeed contain the information as
he states. Whether the article is cited is really of no concern given he
names the actual almanacs.
I have long thought the Jews had the producers of the Almanacs alter their
books to better fit the Jew's Holocaust story.
This is another piece of proof in the level of deceit and fraud the Jews
have managed to engage in to create and perpetuate this disgusting myth.
I take particular note of your hysterical screeching and shouting. Only
people who are deeply troubled over having their lies discovered behave in
this way.
flaviaR
You will find the article this comes from on Wikipedia. It is penned
by the Jews themselves.
You have once again made a complete laughing stock of yourself.
Nizkor Project
>
> - Show quoted text -
drahcir LOL see how easy it was. ROFL
RamBam
"flaviaR" <flavia...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:915efd96-c8e9-453f...@z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
You have beaten me to it. He'll be rather embarrassed about now, I would
think. At least any decent, honest person would be embarrassed.
>You have once again made a complete laughing stock of yourself.
It's a state of perpetuity with him.
CUNTICA
be wearing a tinfoil hat & standing on a ledge somewhere?
........................get a life, mook, there's more to life then
arguing over 60 year old almanacs
............................now piss off, little man!
I'll Always Be 11/07/10
"RamBam" <bam...@internot.net> wrote:
> You have beaten me to it. He'll be rather embarrassed about now, I would
> think. At least any decent, honest person would be embarrassed.
Thank you for proving you are neither decent nor honest.
RJ11
"Ben Cramer", posting as RamBam <bam...@internot.net> wrote:
> But in 1949, the World Almanac gives the
> world Jewish population as 15,713,638,
No, it does not. Stop lying, you sad old nazi kook.
RJ.
RJ11
"Ben Cramer", posting as Abe Safron <saf...@nowhere.com> wrote:
(snip)
For conclusive proof that "Cramer" is a forger, look
at Message-ID: <b4adnSx2NqPH8u7b...@giganews.com>
(http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/9ff48fd4f7f6eaab?dmode=source),
in which he asserts to post the content of the article
"Cold Reminder" NY Times, Dec. 3 1994.
Unfortunately for "Cramer", the NYT archives are now
free. As everyone can easily check by visiting
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE0DB1F30F930A35751C1A962958260,
the article "Cramer" posted has nothing to do with the
actual article.
RJ.
TallHenry
[...]
1) Nym of "revisionist": 'turkeyboy'
Real name: Istvan Lippai
Further details: lives in Colorado, age 73
2) Nym of "revisionist": 'Johannes von Ebersdorf'
Real name: Hans-Peter Skaliks
Further details: lives in Canada, 65 years old, retired
secondary schoolteacher. County of birth:
Germany. See also
http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/s/skaliks.hans-peter/skaliks.ca
3) Nym of "revisionist": 'Zulu/Tango'
Real name: Bernard Gey
Further details: lives in Spain, works (or used
to work) for Keratec.
4) Nym of "revisionist": 'szaki/stardust'
Real name: Julius Szakacs, age 56.
Further details: machinist, used to live (maybe still
does) in Pleasanton, CA.
5) Cocerning "Ben Cramer":
We know that "Cramer" posted a few times as "Alan Jones",
and that he became all hysterical and threatening when
asked about it.
We know that there's a guy living in Australia -- in the
same area which "Cramer" posts from -- whose name is
Alan Jones. We know that this person shares a great
many characteristics with the "Cramer" persona. Both,
for example, claim knowledge of rural Australia. Both
claim to have worked in the IT area. Both claim
knowledge of fire alarm systems (a very limited discipline).
Both claim to be knowledgeable in risk management.
We know that the following was posted by a few folks
about the real Alan Jones and his wife Sue:
"This whole Unisky debacle is little more than one crowd threw out
Alan Jones and wife who evidently bled WBS dry, and another crowd
with the same players have replaced them, created a new name, 'Unisky'
and intend to pick up where WBS left off."
"It seems Unisky, your company, Mr. Hull have acquired the remainder
of the wreckage left behind by Alan Jones and company---a corpse,
if you will. Putting that corpse in a nice shiny new pine box coffin
does nothing, the corpse must be brought back to life."
This is what we know. And we will know more in due time.
Advocate
"RamBam" <bam...@internot.net> wrote in message
news:i1bd2a$38o$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
This is an interesting thread.
I had heard of the Jews manipulating Almanac figures, but had never seen any
evidence of it.
By using the information in the original post, I have been able to discover
a large quantity of material proving the Jews did indeed manipulate the
figures to support their Holocaust story.
This should be made public knowledge and should be widely reported in the
press. It won't be, of course, because of who controls the press.
>
>
>
>
RJ11
"Ben Cramer", posting as Advocate <advo...@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
To evaluate the veracity of "Cramer's" alleged
"quotes", have a look at
Message-ID: <b4adnSx2NqPH8u7b...@giganews.com>
(http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/9ff48fd4f7f6eaab?dmode=source),
in which "Cramer" asserts to post the content of the article
"Cold Reminder" NY Times, Dec. 3 1994.
Unfortunately for him, the NYT archives are now
drahcir
> "drahcir" <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6a405e94-5982-422e...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 10, 7:27 pm, "RamBam" <bama...@internot.net> wrote:
>
> >NO IT DOESN'T
>
> Yes it does
>
> >> while the
> >NO IT DOESN'T
>
> Yes it does
>
>
>
> >> two sets of figures for the world Jewish population,
> >NO THEY DON'T
>
> Yes they do.
>
>
>
> >> one attributed to the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and
>
>
> >> The set from the AJC makes clear they use figures
> >> from 1938, "the last available data".
> >NO IT DOESN'T
>
> It most certainly does.
>
>
>
> >> Until 1949, the two sets of figures were very similar. But in 1949, the
> >> world Jewish population as 15,713,638,[57] while the AJC number in the
> >> same volume (but for 1947) was 11,266,600.
> >NO IT WASN'T
>
> Yes it was.
>
> >>Moreover, the AJC
> >> revised its estimate of the world Jewish population in 1939 upward, to
> >> 16,643,120.
> >NO IT DIDN'T
>
> But it did. By its own admission
>
>
>
> >> difference between the pre and post war populations is over 5.4
> >> million.
> >NO IT'S NOT
>
> Yes it is.
>
> >> populations for all religions worldwide, while continuing to carry the
> >> AJC's numbers regarding the world Jewish population.
> >NO THEY DIDN'T
>
> Yes they did.
>
> >see how easy it is to refute uncited crap? your turn....
>
> You have refuted nothing.
PRECISELY!! I've refuted nothing because you posted nothing.
You have lied and whines. AsJewsdo.
> The information in RamBam's
Fucking idiot, do you not get that everyone knows you're using
multiple id's and you are rambam? MORON.
More uncited bullshit below.
post was so interesting I did a little
> investigation. He's right. The Almanace do indeed contain the information as
> he states. Whether the article is cited is really of no concern given he
> names the actual almanacs.
>
> I have long thought theJewshad the producers of the Almanacs alter their
drahcir
>
>
>
> > On Jul 10, 7:27 pm, "RamBam" <bama...@internot.net> wrote:
>
>
> > NO IT DOESN'T
>
> > > while the
>
> > NO IT DOESN'T
>
> > > The WorldAlmanacvolumes from 1945 to 1949[53][54][55][56] present
> > > two sets of figures for the world Jewish population,
>
> > NO THEY DON'T
>
> > > one attributed to the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and
>
>
> > > The set from the AJC makes clear they use figures
> > > from 1938, "the last available data".
>
> > NO IT DOESN'T
>
> > > Until 1949, the two sets of figures were very similar. But in 1949, the
> > > world Jewish population as 15,713,638,[57] while the AJC number in the
> > > same volume (but for 1947) was 11,266,600.
>
> > NO IT WASN'T
>
> > Moreover, the AJC
>
> > > revised its estimate of the world Jewish population in 1939 upward, to
> > > 16,643,120.
>
> > NO IT DIDN'T
>
> > > difference between the pre and post war populations is over 5.4
> > > million.
>
> > NO IT'S NOT
>
>
> > > populations for all religions worldwide, while continuing to carry the
> > > AJC's numbers regarding the world Jewish population.
>
> > NO THEY DIDN'T
>
> > see how easy it is to refute uncited crap? your turn....
>
> You will find the article this comes from on Wikipedia. It is penned
> by theJewsthemselves.
Prove it.
> You have once again made a complete laughing stock of yourself.
Babbling idiot.
drahcir
> On Jul 10, 10:24 pm, flaviaR <flaviaras...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 11, 11:12 am, drahcir <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 10, 7:27 pm, "RamBam" <bama...@internot.net> wrote:
>
>
> > > NO IT DOESN'T
>
> > > > while the
>
> > > NO IT DOESN'T
>
> > > > The WorldAlmanacvolumes from 1945 to 1949[53][54][55][56] present
> > > > two sets of figures for the world Jewish population,
>
> > > NO THEY DON'T
>
> > > > one attributed to the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and
>
>
> > > > The set from the AJC makes clear they use figures
> > > > from 1938, "the last available data".
>
> > > NO IT DOESN'T
>
> > > > Until 1949, the two sets of figures were very similar. But in 1949, the
> > > > world Jewish population as 15,713,638,[57] while the AJC number in the
> > > > same volume (but for 1947) was 11,266,600.
>
> > > NO IT WASN'T
>
> > > Moreover, the AJC
>
> > > > revised its estimate of the world Jewish population in 1939 upward, to
> > > > 16,643,120.
>
> > > NO IT DIDN'T
>
> > > > difference between the pre and post war populations is over 5.4
> > > > million.
>
> > > NO IT'S NOT
>
>
> > > > populations for all religions worldwide, while continuing to carry the
> > > > AJC's numbers regarding the world Jewish population.
>
> > > NO THEY DIDN'T
>
> > > see how easy it is to refute uncited crap? your turn....
>
> > You will find the article this comes from on Wikipedia. It is penned
> > by theJewsthemselves.
>
> > You have once again made a complete laughing stock of yourself.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> drahcir LOL see how easy it was. ROFL
Ben apparently does not have the mental capacity to realize what a
complete fool he proves himself with every post he makes.
drahcir
>
> news:6a405e94-5982-422e...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 10, 7:27 pm, "RamBam" <bama...@internot.net> wrote:
>
> >NO IT DOESN'T
>
> Yes it does
>
> >> while the
> >NO IT DOESN'T
>
> Yes it does
>
>
>
> >> two sets of figures for the world Jewish population,
> >NO THEY DON'T
>
> Yes they do.
>
>
>
> >> one attributed to the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and
>
>
> >> The set from the AJC makes clear they use figures
> >> from 1938, "the last available data".
> >NO IT DOESN'T
>
> It most certainly does.
>
>
>
> >> Until 1949, the two sets of figures were very similar. But in 1949, the
> >> world Jewish population as 15,713,638,[57] while the AJC number in the
> >> same volume (but for 1947) was 11,266,600.
> >NO IT WASN'T
>
> Yes it was.
>
> >>Moreover, the AJC
> >> revised its estimate of the world Jewish population in 1939 upward, to
> >> 16,643,120.
> >NO IT DIDN'T
>
> But it did. By its own admission
>
>
>
> >> difference between the pre and post war populations is over 5.4
> >> million.
> >NO IT'S NOT
>
> Yes it is.
>
> >> populations for all religions worldwide, while continuing to carry the
> >> AJC's numbers regarding the world Jewish population.
> >NO THEY DIDN'T
>
> Yes they did.
>
> >see how easy it is to refute uncited crap? your turn....
>
> You have refuted nothing. You have lied and whines. AsJewsdo.
> The information in RamBam's post was so interesting I did a little
> investigation. He's right. The Almanace do indeed contain the information as
> he states. Whether the article is cited is really of no concern given he
> names the actual almanacs.
>
Gord McFee
> The 1940 World Almanac gives the world Jewish population as
> 15,319,359, while the 1948 World Almanac gives the world Jewish
> population as 15,713,638.
Wrong as usual, Ben.
<quote>
44) How do you explain the fact that the World Almanac showed 15,319,359
Jews in the world in 1940 and 15,713,638 in 1949 (based on 1948
figures), if 6 million Jews are supposed to have perished in the Holocaust?
This typical piece of denier chicanery is explained fairly easily.
Deniers like to make us think that the 1948 figure is the number of Jews
in 1948, but it is not. The 1948 figures (quoted in the 1949 edition)
are based on the 1938 - that is pre-war - census. The figures for 1949
are post-war and show a catastrophic drop in the Jewish population, down
to 11,266,600. When you factor in the fact that the 1949 edition
assessed the 1939 population at 16,643,120, you arrive at a difference
of 5,376,520.
</quote>
http://www.holocaust-history.org/denial/revisionism-qa.shtml
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org