Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
When it rains, it pours
84 views
Skip to first unread message
Davis
Aug 13, 2012, 12:25:15 PM8/13/12
to
As I'm sure everyone noticed, there has suddenly been a rash of OSA posts
after a long dry spell - it's as if they suddenly re-discovered A.R.S. again
after ignoring this place for so long. (OK, it's nothing like the 'good old
days' but it's a start)
My question is, what might have brought about this sudden change of strategy?
Could it be that OSA's "rapid-reaction task force" (Louanne socks, etc.)
called into action in the wake of Tom Cruise's divorce, now have nothing much
to do since the news media has now largely abandoned the topic of
Scientology? Also, what are the odds that 'Steve Layton' hangs around here
long enough to be turned into the next Magoo?
after a long dry spell - it's as if they suddenly re-discovered A.R.S. again
after ignoring this place for so long. (OK, it's nothing like the 'good old
days' but it's a start)
My question is, what might have brought about this sudden change of strategy?
Could it be that OSA's "rapid-reaction task force" (Louanne socks, etc.)
called into action in the wake of Tom Cruise's divorce, now have nothing much
to do since the news media has now largely abandoned the topic of
Scientology? Also, what are the odds that 'Steve Layton' hangs around here
long enough to be turned into the next Magoo?
Dennis Erlich
Aug 13, 2012, 2:58:10 PM8/13/12
to
back to Woody in the mid 90s. They come on ars thinking that the
reason ars isn't "handled" is that no one has yet correctly applied
Elrong's Dreck. So the job description is Dead Agent and Deflect.
They come and go without any special external event precipitating
them. It's just if OSA can find someone doing A to E that can work
their way back into good standing by "striking a deadly blow to the
enemy."
To answer his stupid question, the reason people believe that the
Poodle is a power mad little dick who slaps people around, besides
just plain torturing them, is that we have seen it with our own eyes
and we know and trust all the others who have too.
Whereas, anonymous scumbags, who DA and Sliem for the cult stand out
like farts in an elevator.
D
------------------------
"We can cure cancer. We just can't ~say~ we can." - Elrong Hubturd (XDn Tape 2)
Kat
Aug 14, 2012, 2:11:59 AM8/14/12
to
On Monday, August 13, 2012 12:25:15 PM UTC-4, Davis wrote:
> Also, what are the odds that 'Steve Layton' hangs around here
>
> long enough to be turned into the next Magoo?
Not very. Might want to check the post I just made a few minutes ago.
> Also, what are the odds that 'Steve Layton' hangs around here
>
> long enough to be turned into the next Magoo?
I got him good >=3
Kat
Aug 14, 2012, 2:16:07 AM8/14/12
to
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 2:11:59 AM UTC-4, Kat wrote:
>
> Not very. Might want to check the post I just made a few minutes ago.
>
>
>
> I got him good >=3
Charming, google is taking it's sweet time posting it. Ah well.
>
> Not very. Might want to check the post I just made a few minutes ago.
>
>
>
> I got him good >=3
Tim Higgs = Steve Layton = Truth Seeker.
IP traces back to a private residence and they both have the same IP.
Yeeep. He got caught the same way he did last time.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Aug 14, 2012, 3:26:04 PM8/14/12
to
"Kat" <lady...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8ffff168-f46c-464c...@googlegroups.com...
You are such a moron, Kat. Do you really think every individual has a
different IP number?
Bwahahhahahahhahaha. The IP number you would see for me, if you could see it,
just happens to be an upstream backbone for a major provider that thousands of
people are routed through.
Typical female! Stupid and ignorant because of arrogance.
--
Sir Gregory
news:8ffff168-f46c-464c...@googlegroups.com...
different IP number?
Bwahahhahahahhahaha. The IP number you would see for me, if you could see it,
just happens to be an upstream backbone for a major provider that thousands of
people are routed through.
Typical female! Stupid and ignorant because of arrogance.
--
Sir Gregory
Davis
Aug 14, 2012, 9:45:22 PM8/14/12
to
introductions!)
... . and just as Kat knocks out the Truth Seeker sockpuppets, several free
usenet server admins have banded together to try to rid themselves of that
pathetic troll who posts as "Gregory Hall" and other pseudonyms.
It's funny how the same person will cry in one newsgroup that his privacy
rights are being violated whenever his IP address gets logged -- and then in
another newsgroup argue the exact opposite; that his IP means nothing since
it's shared with thousands.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.free.newsservers/browse_thread/thread/65c768e6feea9811/387efe63241ff5fb
(It's a thread from a few years back, but even to this day Snotboy still
cries and whimpers about being discovered and banned from a multitude of free
servers he thought he has every right to abuse. )
--Davis
Davis
Aug 14, 2012, 10:20:16 PM8/14/12
to
probably better than anyone.
And that elevator analogy is about right. Supposedly in the past Bill Yaude
claimed to have an army of pseudonyms that he developed over time --with many
of them becoming trusted infiltrators. (or at least he bragged) but maybe
that was just legend/propaganda.
But then there's these hit-and-run attackbots that do nothing but walk in and
stink up the place. And since "Cultus Defensor" and "Steve Layton"
(/Truthseeker - hat tip to Kat) appeared at the same time, of course it's
going to raise suspicion.
--Davis
Kat
Aug 14, 2012, 10:51:16 PM8/14/12
to
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:45:22 PM UTC-4, Davis wrote:
>
> Nice detective work, Kat. (and it seems you and Truth Seeker need no
>
> introductions!)
Aye, he's hated me since I outed him during his operation on Sparrow. Poor sucker got caught THAT time because of his IP as well. Don't they say that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result?
>
> Nice detective work, Kat. (and it seems you and Truth Seeker need no
>
> introductions!)
>
>
>
>
>
> ... . and just as Kat knocks out the Truth Seeker sockpuppets, several free
>
> usenet server admins have banded together to try to rid themselves of that
>
> pathetic troll who posts as "Gregory Hall" and other pseudonyms.
>
>
>
> It's funny how the same person will cry in one newsgroup that his privacy
>
> rights are being violated whenever his IP address gets logged -- and then in
>
> another newsgroup argue the exact opposite; that his IP means nothing since
>
> it's shared with thousands.
>
>
>
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.free.newsservers/browse_thread/thread/65c768e6feea9811/387efe63241ff5fb
>
>
>
> (It's a thread from a few years back, but even to this day Snotboy still
>
> cries and whimpers about being discovered and banned from a multitude of free
>
> servers he thought he has every right to abuse. )
>
>
>
> --Davis
xenufrance
Aug 15, 2012, 7:59:24 AM8/15/12
to
Le 13/08/2012 20:58, Dennis Erlich a �crit :
including getting help from such a loon as KNT or before, as barbie, is
something useful (at least they think). If THAT was of any use, which
they believe but are'nt able to calculate or prove, tehre would have
been a true expansion of the crime cult.
Apart of the rich davey buying buildings with stolen or defrauded
monies, none of such "expansion" exists.
> "Davis"<da...@mailinator.com> wrote:
>
>> As I'm sure everyone noticed, there has suddenly been a rash of OSA posts
>> after a long dry spell - it's as if they suddenly re-discovered A.R.S. again
>> after ignoring this place for so long. (OK, it's nothing like the 'good old
>> days' but it's a start)
>>
>> My question is, what might have brought about this sudden change of strategy?
>> Could it be that OSA's "rapid-reaction task force" (Louanne socks, etc.)
>> called into action in the wake of Tom Cruise's divorce, now have nothing much
>> to do since the news media has now largely abandoned the topic of
>> Scientology? Also, what are the odds that 'Steve Layton' hangs around here
>> long enough to be turned into the next Magoo?
>
> Davis, there have been a number of "Steve Laytons" going all the way
> back to Woody in the mid 90s. They come on ars thinking that the
> reason ars isn't "handled" is that no one has yet correctly applied
> Elrong's Dreck. So the job description is Dead Agent and Deflect.
> They come and go without any special external event precipitating
> them. It's just if OSA can find someone doing A to E that can work
> their way back into good standing by "striking a deadly blow to the
> enemy."
I share that viewpoint, Dennis. I fear that any way to attack ARS,
>
>> As I'm sure everyone noticed, there has suddenly been a rash of OSA posts
>> after a long dry spell - it's as if they suddenly re-discovered A.R.S. again
>> after ignoring this place for so long. (OK, it's nothing like the 'good old
>> days' but it's a start)
>>
>> My question is, what might have brought about this sudden change of strategy?
>> Could it be that OSA's "rapid-reaction task force" (Louanne socks, etc.)
>> called into action in the wake of Tom Cruise's divorce, now have nothing much
>> to do since the news media has now largely abandoned the topic of
>> Scientology? Also, what are the odds that 'Steve Layton' hangs around here
>> long enough to be turned into the next Magoo?
>
> Davis, there have been a number of "Steve Laytons" going all the way
> back to Woody in the mid 90s. They come on ars thinking that the
> reason ars isn't "handled" is that no one has yet correctly applied
> Elrong's Dreck. So the job description is Dead Agent and Deflect.
> They come and go without any special external event precipitating
> them. It's just if OSA can find someone doing A to E that can work
> their way back into good standing by "striking a deadly blow to the
> enemy."
including getting help from such a loon as KNT or before, as barbie, is
something useful (at least they think). If THAT was of any use, which
they believe but are'nt able to calculate or prove, tehre would have
been a true expansion of the crime cult.
Apart of the rich davey buying buildings with stolen or defrauded
monies, none of such "expansion" exists.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Aug 15, 2012, 9:59:22 AM8/15/12
to
"Davis" <da...@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:502aff1d$0$7685$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com...
You are one dumb individual. You managed to verify my point in your failed
attempt to debunk it. The fact is that the BananaBoi blocked an upstream node
where a backbone from a giant telecom connects to the internet backbone. In
his false assumption (like Kat's) that IP numbers are a one-to-one proposition
he blocked thousands of people in one fell swoop. IOW, his ignorance was even
more egregious than Kats as Kat is a nobody who controls doesn't and can't
control anybody else while he, being an NSP admin should have known better.
The reason I "cry and whimper" is so informed people who are not ignorant if
IP number protocols can continue to have a laugh at the expense of you
self-righteous, seriously ignorant putzes.
--
Sir Gregory
news:502aff1d$0$7685$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com...
attempt to debunk it. The fact is that the BananaBoi blocked an upstream node
where a backbone from a giant telecom connects to the internet backbone. In
his false assumption (like Kat's) that IP numbers are a one-to-one proposition
he blocked thousands of people in one fell swoop. IOW, his ignorance was even
more egregious than Kats as Kat is a nobody who controls doesn't and can't
control anybody else while he, being an NSP admin should have known better.
The reason I "cry and whimper" is so informed people who are not ignorant if
IP number protocols can continue to have a laugh at the expense of you
self-righteous, seriously ignorant putzes.
--
Sir Gregory
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Aug 15, 2012, 10:04:49 AM8/15/12
to
"Kat" <lady...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:d02a07ef-daca-46e4...@googlegroups.com...
> On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:45:22 PM UTC-4, Davis wrote:
>>
>> Nice detective work, Kat. (and it seems you and Truth Seeker need no
>> introductions!)
>
> Aye, he's hated me since I outed him during his operation on Sparrow.
> Poor sucker got caught THAT time because of his IP as well. Don't they
> say that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over
> again and expecting a different result?
>>
>> ... . and just as Kat knocks out the Truth Seeker sockpuppets, several free
>> usenet server admins have banded together to try to rid themselves of that
>> pathetic troll who posts as "Gregory Hall" and other pseudonyms.
>>
>> It's funny how the same person will cry in one newsgroup that his privacy
>> rights are being violated whenever his IP address gets logged -- and then
>> in
>> another newsgroup argue the exact opposite; that his IP means nothing since
>> it's shared with thousands.
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.free.newsservers/browse_thread/thread/65c768e6feea9811/387efe63241ff5fb
>>
>> (It's a thread from a few years back, but even to this day Snotboy still
>> cries and whimpers about being discovered and banned from a
>> mulitude of free servers he thought he has every right to abuse. )
>>
>> Nice detective work, Kat. (and it seems you and Truth Seeker need no
>> introductions!)
>
> Aye, he's hated me since I outed him during his operation on Sparrow.
> Poor sucker got caught THAT time because of his IP as well. Don't they
> say that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over
> again and expecting a different result?
>>
>> ... . and just as Kat knocks out the Truth Seeker sockpuppets, several free
>> usenet server admins have banded together to try to rid themselves of that
>> pathetic troll who posts as "Gregory Hall" and other pseudonyms.
>>
>> It's funny how the same person will cry in one newsgroup that his privacy
>> rights are being violated whenever his IP address gets logged -- and then
>> in
>> another newsgroup argue the exact opposite; that his IP means nothing since
>> it's shared with thousands.
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.free.newsservers/browse_thread/thread/65c768e6feea9811/387efe63241ff5fb
>>
>> (It's a thread from a few years back, but even to this day Snotboy still
>> cries and whimpers about being discovered and banned from a
>
> I don't know how anyone can dedicate years of their life to telling lies
> on usenet. That must be one empty existence right there.
Says the empty headed femiNazi whose new husband has already run out on her .
> I don't know how anyone can dedicate years of their life to telling lies
> on usenet. That must be one empty existence right there.
. .
Says the dumb bitch who can't figure out how to use anything but Google Groups
which cannot even manage to attribute correctly. They used to not attribute at
all and now with the new Google Groups they double-space attribute. And people
like Kat expect to be taken seriously while using a defective means to access
Usenet? Yah, right!
--
Sir Gregory
John Dorsay
Aug 15, 2012, 10:37:08 AM8/15/12
to
On 8/15/2012 9:59 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> "Davis" <da...@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:502aff1d$0$7685$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com...
> "Davis" <da...@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:502aff1d$0$7685$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com...
>> Nice detective work, Kat. (and it seems you and Truth Seeker need no
>> introductions!)
>>
>>
>> ... . and just as Kat knocks out the Truth Seeker sockpuppets, several free
>> usenet server admins have banded together to try to rid themselves of that
>> pathetic troll who posts as "Gregory Hall" and other pseudonyms.
>>
>> It's funny how the same person will cry in one newsgroup that his privacy
>> rights are being violated whenever his IP address gets logged -- and then in
>> another newsgroup argue the exact opposite; that his IP means nothing since
>> it's shared with thousands.
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.free.newsservers/browse_thread/thread/65c768e6feea9811/387efe63241ff5fb
>>
>> (It's a thread from a few years back, but even to this day Snotboy still
>> cries and whimpers about being discovered and banned from a multitude of
>> free
>> servers he thought he has every right to abuse. )
>
> You are one dumb individual. You managed to verify my point in your failed
> attempt to debunk it. The fact is that the BananaBoi blocked an upstream node
> where a backbone from a giant telecom connects to the internet backbone. In
> his false assumption (like Kat's) that IP numbers are a one-to-one proposition
> he blocked thousands of people in one fell swoop. IOW, his ignorance was even
> more egregious than Kats as Kat is a nobody who controls doesn't and can't
> control anybody else while he, being an NSP admin should have known better.
nslookup 71.200.118.150
>> introductions!)
>>
>>
>> ... . and just as Kat knocks out the Truth Seeker sockpuppets, several free
>> usenet server admins have banded together to try to rid themselves of that
>> pathetic troll who posts as "Gregory Hall" and other pseudonyms.
>>
>> It's funny how the same person will cry in one newsgroup that his privacy
>> rights are being violated whenever his IP address gets logged -- and then in
>> another newsgroup argue the exact opposite; that his IP means nothing since
>> it's shared with thousands.
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.free.newsservers/browse_thread/thread/65c768e6feea9811/387efe63241ff5fb
>>
>> (It's a thread from a few years back, but even to this day Snotboy still
>> cries and whimpers about being discovered and banned from a multitude of
>> free
>> servers he thought he has every right to abuse. )
>
> You are one dumb individual. You managed to verify my point in your failed
> attempt to debunk it. The fact is that the BananaBoi blocked an upstream node
> where a backbone from a giant telecom connects to the internet backbone. In
> his false assumption (like Kat's) that IP numbers are a one-to-one proposition
> he blocked thousands of people in one fell swoop. IOW, his ignorance was even
> more egregious than Kats as Kat is a nobody who controls doesn't and can't
> control anybody else while he, being an NSP admin should have known better.
150.118.200.71.in-addr.arpa
name = c-71-200-118-150.hsd1.md.comcast.net
And c-71-200-118-150.hsd1.md.comcast.net is an upstream node of
what, exactly?
> The reason I "cry and whimper" is so informed people who are not ignorant if
> IP number protocols can continue to have a laugh at the expense of you
> self-righteous, seriously ignorant putzes.
you, Greg. Surely you can troll better.
John
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Aug 15, 2012, 1:12:37 PM8/15/12
to
"John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k0gc6m$117$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
WTF? Those Comcast IP numbers??? Just what do they have to do with me or the
fact that E/S fka Motzarella blocked a huge number of people all using an
upstream backbone IP number??? Why pick some random IP number out of the
ether and attempt to make some illusionary point with it? You cannot access my
IP number because I don't have one. You can't find whatever upstream provider
I happen to be using from day to day because my Usenet provider, Altopia,
doesn't include it in my headers. It takes a subpoena to get ahold of it. And,
should somebody manage to subpoena it, it would resolve to the IP node in
Miami with which thousands of folk access the Internet. Duh, I do not have an
Internet Service Provider. I use free public hotspots, unsecured private
wi-fi, and/or any other accessible connection I can scoop out of the ether.
Furthermore, what do the Comcast IP numbers have to do with the fact that Kat
believes each individual computer has an unique IP number whereby the user and
sock puppets can be positively identified? Good freaking grief. It's like
talking to a wall around here.
--
Sir Gregory
news:k0gc6m$117$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
fact that E/S fka Motzarella blocked a huge number of people all using an
upstream backbone IP number??? Why pick some random IP number out of the
ether and attempt to make some illusionary point with it? You cannot access my
IP number because I don't have one. You can't find whatever upstream provider
I happen to be using from day to day because my Usenet provider, Altopia,
doesn't include it in my headers. It takes a subpoena to get ahold of it. And,
should somebody manage to subpoena it, it would resolve to the IP node in
Miami with which thousands of folk access the Internet. Duh, I do not have an
Internet Service Provider. I use free public hotspots, unsecured private
wi-fi, and/or any other accessible connection I can scoop out of the ether.
Furthermore, what do the Comcast IP numbers have to do with the fact that Kat
believes each individual computer has an unique IP number whereby the user and
sock puppets can be positively identified? Good freaking grief. It's like
talking to a wall around here.
--
Sir Gregory
John Dorsay
Aug 15, 2012, 4:36:46 PM8/15/12
to
On 8/15/2012 1:12 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> "John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:k0gc6m$117$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
>> On 8/15/2012 9:59 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>> where a backbone from a giant telecom connects to the internet backbone. In
>>> his false assumption (like Kat's) that IP numbers are a one-to-one
>>> proposition
>>> he blocked thousands of people in one fell swoop. IOW, his ignorance was
>>> even
>>> more egregious than Kats as Kat is a nobody who controls doesn't and can't
>>> control anybody else while he, being an NSP admin should have known better.
>>
>> nslookup 71.200.118.150
>> 150.118.200.71.in-addr.arpa
>> name = c-71-200-118-150.hsd1.md.comcast.net
>>
>> And c-71-200-118-150.hsd1.md.comcast.net is an upstream node of
>> what, exactly?
>>
>>> The reason I "cry and whimper" is so informed people who are not ignorant
>>> if
>>> IP number protocols can continue to have a laugh at the expense of you
>>> self-righteous, seriously ignorant putzes.
>>
>> The only self-righteous, ignorant putz posting to this thread is
>> you, Greg. Surely you can troll better.
>
>
> WTF? Those Comcast IP numbers??? Just what do they have to do with me or the
Why, that's the truthseeker/steve whoever ip address that you
> "John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:k0gc6m$117$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
>> On 8/15/2012 9:59 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>> where a backbone from a giant telecom connects to the internet backbone. In
>>> his false assumption (like Kat's) that IP numbers are a one-to-one
>>> proposition
>>> he blocked thousands of people in one fell swoop. IOW, his ignorance was
>>> even
>>> more egregious than Kats as Kat is a nobody who controls doesn't and can't
>>> control anybody else while he, being an NSP admin should have known better.
>>
>> nslookup 71.200.118.150
>> 150.118.200.71.in-addr.arpa
>> name = c-71-200-118-150.hsd1.md.comcast.net
>>
>> And c-71-200-118-150.hsd1.md.comcast.net is an upstream node of
>> what, exactly?
>>
>>> The reason I "cry and whimper" is so informed people who are not ignorant
>>> if
>>> IP number protocols can continue to have a laugh at the expense of you
>>> self-righteous, seriously ignorant putzes.
>>
>> The only self-righteous, ignorant putz posting to this thread is
>> you, Greg. Surely you can troll better.
>
>
> WTF? Those Comcast IP numbers??? Just what do they have to do with me or the
repeatedly claim Kat misunderstood. You didn't recognize it?
Or did I miss the post where you explained what kind of upstream
node operates at that Comcast ip *number*?
Cry and whimper much, Putzboi?
With all due respect,
John
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Aug 15, 2012, 6:03:14 PM8/15/12
to
"John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k0h190$g0o$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
[trim]
> Why, that's the truthseeker/steve whoever ip address that you
> repeatedly claim Kat misunderstood. You didn't recognize it?
access.
Their cables stretch for hundreds of miles with exclusivity prior to
connecting to an Internet backbone which is the IP number you seem to be so
inthralled with. IOW, hundreds or thousands of people access the Internet from
Comcast via that upstream backbone connection. It is the SAME IP NUMBER for
all those hundreds or thousands of people.
So, all anybody knows is that the IP number you and Kat are in love with
(71.200.118.150) resides in Salisbury, Md.
BIG FUCKING DEAL. It is not even close to being indicative, much less proof,
that one person routed to the Internet through it is a sock of another person
routed through it.
Everybody fancies themselves to be an expert when it's abundantly clear the
only thing they're expert at is arogantly proclaiming their ignorance about
how things work.
--
Sir Gregory
John Dorsay
Aug 15, 2012, 6:51:32 PM8/15/12
to
On 8/15/2012 6:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> "John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:k0h190$g0o$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
>
> [trim]
>
>> Why, that's the truthseeker/steve whoever ip address that you
>> repeatedly claim Kat misunderstood. You didn't recognize it?
>
> Comcast is a CABLE network that provides television, phone and Internet
> access.
>
> Their cables stretch for hundreds of miles with exclusivity prior to
> connecting to an Internet backbone which is the IP number you seem to be so
> inthralled with. IOW, hundreds or thousands of people access the Internet from
> Comcast via that upstream backbone connection. It is the SAME IP NUMBER for
> all those hundreds or thousands of people.
So what, Putzboi? Is c-71-200-118-150.hsd1.md.comcast.net part of
> "John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:k0h190$g0o$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
>
> [trim]
>
>> Why, that's the truthseeker/steve whoever ip address that you
>> repeatedly claim Kat misunderstood. You didn't recognize it?
>
> Comcast is a CABLE network that provides television, phone and Internet
> access.
>
> Their cables stretch for hundreds of miles with exclusivity prior to
> connecting to an Internet backbone which is the IP number you seem to be so
> inthralled with. IOW, hundreds or thousands of people access the Internet from
> Comcast via that upstream backbone connection. It is the SAME IP NUMBER for
> all those hundreds or thousands of people.
the internet backbone? If it isn't, why all the hand-waving?
> So, all anybody knows is that the IP number you and Kat are in love with
> (71.200.118.150) resides in Salisbury, Md.
you can't traceroute to an ip number that might be used by hundreds
or thousands of people, don't you think?
Poor Putzboi. Shown up by Kat. Again.
I bet it sucks to be you.
As always, with all due respect,
John
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Aug 15, 2012, 7:09:24 PM8/15/12
to
"John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k0h95m$tf5$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
> On 8/15/2012 6:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> "John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:k0h190$g0o$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> [trim]
>>
>>> Why, that's the truthseeker/steve whoever ip address that you
>>> repeatedly claim Kat misunderstood. You didn't recognize it?
>>
>> Comcast is a CABLE network that provides television, phone and Internet
>> access.
>>
>> Their cables stretch for hundreds of miles with exclusivity prior to
>> connecting to an Internet backbone which is the IP number you seem to be so
>> inthralled with. IOW, hundreds or thousands of people access the Internet
>> from
>> Comcast via that upstream backbone connection. It is the SAME IP NUMBER for
>> all those hundreds or thousands of people.
>
> So what, Putzboi? Is c-71-200-118-150.hsd1.md.comcast.net part of
> the internet backbone? If it isn't, why all the hand-waving?
Ah, just like Kat you attempt to avoid the matter of your defeat and
>> "John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:k0h190$g0o$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> [trim]
>>
>>> Why, that's the truthseeker/steve whoever ip address that you
>>> repeatedly claim Kat misunderstood. You didn't recognize it?
>>
>> Comcast is a CABLE network that provides television, phone and Internet
>> access.
>>
>> Their cables stretch for hundreds of miles with exclusivity prior to
>> connecting to an Internet backbone which is the IP number you seem to be so
>> inthralled with. IOW, hundreds or thousands of people access the Internet
>> from
>> Comcast via that upstream backbone connection. It is the SAME IP NUMBER for
>> all those hundreds or thousands of people.
>
> So what, Putzboi? Is c-71-200-118-150.hsd1.md.comcast.net part of
> the internet backbone? If it isn't, why all the hand-waving?
comeupance by resorting to ad hominems. LOL.
>
>> So, all anybody knows is that the IP number you and Kat are in love with
>> (71.200.118.150) resides in Salisbury, Md.
>
> Can you traceroute to 71.200.118.150, Putzboi? Pretty strange that
> you can't traceroute to an ip number that might be used by hundreds
> or thousands of people, don't you think?
It's a connection protocol, not a computer or a provider, dumbass! You can't
connect to a gateway as a stopping point, dumbass! This proves my point that
said gateway in no way identifies an unique user.
--
Sir Gregory
Kat
Aug 15, 2012, 7:49:50 PM8/15/12
to
I know you are hoping I will be single and desperate enough to fall for your "charms", but I have standards. :)
>
>
>
> Says the dumb bitch who can't figure out how to use anything but Google Groups
>
> which cannot even manage to attribute correctly. They used to not attribute at
>
> all and now with the new Google Groups they double-space attribute. And people
>
> like Kat expect to be taken seriously while using a defective means to access
>
> Usenet? Yah, right!
What's the matter "Sir" Gregory? Don't like someone calling you trash? Don't act like it.
John Dorsay
Aug 16, 2012, 9:09:12 AM8/16/12
to
On 8/15/2012 7:09 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> "John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> "John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> Can you traceroute to 71.200.118.150, Putzboi? Pretty strange that
>> you can't traceroute to an ip number that might be used by hundreds
>> or thousands of people, don't you think?
>
> FAIL!
>
> It's a connection protocol, not a computer or a provider, dumbass! You can't
> connect to a gateway as a stopping point, dumbass! This proves my point that
> said gateway in no way identifies an unique user.
WTF are you babbling about now, Putzboi? Are you trying to claim
>> you can't traceroute to an ip number that might be used by hundreds
>> or thousands of people, don't you think?
>
> FAIL!
>
> It's a connection protocol, not a computer or a provider, dumbass! You can't
> connect to a gateway as a stopping point, dumbass! This proves my point that
> said gateway in no way identifies an unique user.
traceroute is a "connection protocol"??? Got a reference for that?
The only "gateway" that might exist at 71.200.118.150 is a $50
"residential gateway" from linksys or dlink or one of their competitors.
I will give you this much. At least you managed to elicit a chuckle
from me with this latest post. Too bad the only way you can manage a
decent troll is by saying something so outrageously stupid that
people laugh *at* you.
With the usual respect,
John
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Aug 16, 2012, 1:24:34 PM8/16/12
to
"John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k0irdq$f21$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
In case you've forgotten the argument started out being the FACT that because
two or more people have the same IP doesn't necessarily mean they are socks.
If you want further proof of this FACT then please examine my headers.
Are you and Kat now going to claim that I am a Steve Layton sock because my
posting host is: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.200.118.150
SMACKDOWN!
--
Sir Gregory
John Dorsay
Aug 16, 2012, 1:32:23 PM8/16/12
to
that the FACT that truthseeker/steve layton are one and the same was
not established by the FACT that both accounts post from the same
residential ip address. And you claimed that traceroute is a
"connection protocol" <snicker>. Have you learned about UDP yet?
> If you want further proof of this FACT then please examine my headers.
>
> Are you and Kat now going to claim that I am a Steve Layton sock because my
> posting host is: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.200.118.150
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Aug 16, 2012, 1:57:47 PM8/16/12
to
"John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k0jar9$ihb$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...
For a HUGE SMACKDOWN and further proof that anybody can use Posting Host
71.200.118.150.
And anybody can be Steve Layton posting from Google Groups.
>> If you want further proof of this FACT then please examine my headers.
>>
>> Are you and Kat now going to claim that I am a Steve Layton sock because my
>> posting host is: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.200.118.150
>
> And the message id is from altopia. What's your point, Putzboi?
their NSP? If you are saying that then you would be wrong.
--
Sir Gregory
John Dorsay
Aug 16, 2012, 5:02:06 PM8/16/12
to
ever, and I have *certainly* never posted from googlegroups·com or
any other pseudodomain you choose to pull out of your ass, that
doesn't provide much evidence that I ever argued that two or more
people with the same IP must be socks.
Got a *real* message id?
> For a HUGE SMACKDOWN and further proof that anybody can use Posting Host
> 71.200.118.150.
>
> And anybody can be Steve Layton posting from Google Groups.
>
>>> If you want further proof of this FACT then please examine my headers.
>>>
>>> Are you and Kat now going to claim that I am a Steve Layton sock because my
>>> posting host is: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.200.118.150
>>
>> And the message id is from altopia. What's your point, Putzboi?
>
> So, are you saying somebody with a comcast account may not retain Altopia as
> their NSP? If you are saying that then you would be wrong.
Volkov
Aug 19, 2012, 7:53:45 AM8/19/12
to
video. First the poodle introduces Earl Cooley, a scientology lawyer.
Cooley and Miscavage shared the stage. The poodle has miniature
everything. If the SOB midget COB lunged at me, it would not be
difficult not to laugh. He really is a midget, with these mini features
and penguin walk.
I couldn't stop laughing as the prettier half and I never saw this dude
with a normal humnan being for reference.
Talk about stunted growth. Must be the cal-mag. :)
I can see why he has a beef with everyone and considers himself
superior, micromanaging everything. The dude is simply suffering from
the classic Napoleonic syndrome. He's superior to the rest of humanity.
My wife was cracking up and saying all he needs is a good hug and a few
"intensives" to rid him of the Homo Novis nonsense.
If this guy is superior, I'll eat my copy of Dianetics.
---------------
Second issue.. Hubbard said, and I paraphrase - any book or organization
which has "mental health" as part of the name is involved in the grand
psychiatric 75 million year old conspiracy.
"Dianietics - The modern science of _MENTAL HEALTH_
Hipocrite... I'm really looking forward to "The Master" -
0 new messages