Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Visitors go here ...
18 views
Skip to first unread message
Etznab
Feb 24, 2016, 10:50:22 PM2/24/16
to
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/n14DCTLrqbE/0W_st3mKhQMJ
That was an example of asking questions and creating a topic for discussion.
Here is another:
"[...] Why they did not first check the roster at Oxford for Sudar Singh's son and proceed from there is beyond me. [... .]"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/6p99RBU1UFg/qU2cW0B4D
Remember that part about Sudar Singh having a son that went to Oxford? Where did that information come from?
Let's ask the man who wrote THE WHOLE TRUTH, The Spiritual Legacy of Paul Twitchell. Does he tell us in his book(s)?
No?
"Someone wrote to me recently about a post of yours, where you mentioned that Paul once said that Sudar Singh had a son who went to Harvard.
"Can you track down the tape that you heard this on? I'd like to listen to it.
"Here's what you said, to refresh your memory: [... .]"
That was Doug Marman asking ME for the information! And notice that he even quoted a post by me. NOT one where I mentioned Harvard, but rather Oxford! It's right there in black and white.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/0PlkI4btLsg/sOEhViiPPXwJ
That thread was also an example of asking questions and people having dialogue without personal attacks, swearing and / or immature and childish troll-like cyber-bully behavior.
Many, many discussions topics such as these were created to explore written history that Paul Twitchell brought together in writings and talks. Nothing wrong with this.
Nothing wrong unless it runs counter to someone's literal interpretation of what they read, because then that person is compelled to search for the whole truth for their self. This - I remember not many threads back - was what Paul and Harold evidently felt the same way about. Finding out for one's self and not being told.
A great majority of my contributions here at a.r.e. (going on a decade now) were queries put in the form of questions.
Imagine.
That was an example of asking questions and creating a topic for discussion.
Here is another:
"[...] Why they did not first check the roster at Oxford for Sudar Singh's son and proceed from there is beyond me. [... .]"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/6p99RBU1UFg/qU2cW0B4D
Remember that part about Sudar Singh having a son that went to Oxford? Where did that information come from?
Let's ask the man who wrote THE WHOLE TRUTH, The Spiritual Legacy of Paul Twitchell. Does he tell us in his book(s)?
No?
"Someone wrote to me recently about a post of yours, where you mentioned that Paul once said that Sudar Singh had a son who went to Harvard.
"Can you track down the tape that you heard this on? I'd like to listen to it.
"Here's what you said, to refresh your memory: [... .]"
That was Doug Marman asking ME for the information! And notice that he even quoted a post by me. NOT one where I mentioned Harvard, but rather Oxford! It's right there in black and white.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/0PlkI4btLsg/sOEhViiPPXwJ
That thread was also an example of asking questions and people having dialogue without personal attacks, swearing and / or immature and childish troll-like cyber-bully behavior.
Many, many discussions topics such as these were created to explore written history that Paul Twitchell brought together in writings and talks. Nothing wrong with this.
Nothing wrong unless it runs counter to someone's literal interpretation of what they read, because then that person is compelled to search for the whole truth for their self. This - I remember not many threads back - was what Paul and Harold evidently felt the same way about. Finding out for one's self and not being told.
A great majority of my contributions here at a.r.e. (going on a decade now) were queries put in the form of questions.
Imagine.
0 new messages