Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Co-carers revisited
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Old Jinglebollocks
Oct 8, 2012, 7:12:11 AM10/8/12
to
Just briefly, I'd like to say that when you love a woman, it is better
not to live with her all the time.
My co-carer and I would be fighting night and day if we didn't get a
break from one another every few days.
Former girlfriends have said to me:
"I can't cope with that level of intensity all the time."
This is quite understandable in an INVERTED civilisation such as
ours.
The fault is not in your intensity. The fault is in the fact that our
civilisation is INVERTED.
I'm an old man offering this advice:
for best results, don't live with your girlfriend all the time.
Just visit one another.
not to live with her all the time.
My co-carer and I would be fighting night and day if we didn't get a
break from one another every few days.
Former girlfriends have said to me:
"I can't cope with that level of intensity all the time."
This is quite understandable in an INVERTED civilisation such as
ours.
The fault is not in your intensity. The fault is in the fact that our
civilisation is INVERTED.
I'm an old man offering this advice:
for best results, don't live with your girlfriend all the time.
Just visit one another.
%
Oct 8, 2012, 11:35:47 AM10/8/12
to
Old Jinglebollocks wrote:
> Just briefly, I'd like to say that when you love a woman, it is better
> not to live with her all the time.
>
> My co-carer and I would be fighting night and day if we didn't get a
> break from one another every few days.
>
> Former girlfriends have said to me:
> "I can't cope with that level of intensity all the time."
>
> This is quite understandable in an INVERTED civilisation such as
> ours.
>
> The fault is not in your intensity. The fault is in the fact that our
> civilisation is INVERTED.
>
i wonder who she's banging when you're not there
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 9, 2012, 12:44:32 AM10/9/12
to
Old Jinglebollocks wrote:
> Just briefly, I'd like to say that when you love a woman, it is better
> not to live with her all the time.
Tom
Oct 9, 2012, 9:04:36 AM10/9/12
to
On 9 Oct, 05:44, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
I don't agree with *the ban on loving more than one* but we learn to
live with the fact that women see *the ban on loving more than one* as
an Article of Faith. It has to do with fear and money, economics, a
secure home, and a good divorce settlement if it comes to that.
live with the fact that women see *the ban on loving more than one* as
an Article of Faith. It has to do with fear and money, economics, a
secure home, and a good divorce settlement if it comes to that.
%
Oct 9, 2012, 12:01:12 PM10/9/12
to
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 11, 2012, 12:59:17 AM10/11/12
to
Tom wrote:
> On 9 Oct, 05:44, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
> <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> > Old Jinglebollocks wrote:
> > > Just briefly, I'd like to say that when you love a woman, it is better
> > > not to live with her all the time.
> >
> > Woman or Not, all the same in regards to the 7 Year Itch!
>
> I don't agree with *the ban on loving more than one*
BIBLE, as Moral LAW, only allows One Union, Man and Wife, and intercourse,
only for Procreation, all else is "SIN"!
FAG or STRAIGHT!
ALL, are Filthy Rags Before GOD!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 11, 2012, 1:01:46 AM10/11/12
to
a Banshee!
We are the Pale Riders, whose NAME, "IS "DEATH"! who the Fuck are YOU!
Special Care
Oct 11, 2012, 6:54:17 AM10/11/12
to
On 11 Oct, 06:01, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
==========================
The tragedy is that you could be a useful woman, contributing to
HEALING, if your energies were better directed.
https://docs.google.com/document/preview?id=1LT4YxF0k4iU22oRXAjt18v1W8r2sUSjNgnHuDTP_pvM
<laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
The tragedy is that you could be a useful woman, contributing to
HEALING, if your energies were better directed.
https://docs.google.com/document/preview?id=1LT4YxF0k4iU22oRXAjt18v1W8r2sUSjNgnHuDTP_pvM
Special Care
Oct 11, 2012, 7:03:25 AM10/11/12
to
%
Oct 11, 2012, 10:16:02 AM10/11/12
to
captain crunch
Oct 11, 2012, 6:30:43 PM10/11/12
to
after I wake up from my nap I'll have the time to read your lengthy
rant......snip!
<gi8h48hbbj3cvah7h...@4ax.com>
Hahha, you are mentally degranged. I am far from tortured, idiot.
%
Oct 11, 2012, 7:31:35 PM10/11/12
to
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 12, 2012, 1:05:27 AM10/12/12
to
Special Care wrote:
> On 11 Oct, 06:01, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
> <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> > "%" wrote:
> > > Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole wrote:
> > > > Old Jinglebollocks wrote:
> >
> > > >> Just briefly, I'd like to say that when you love a woman, it is
> > > >> better not to live with her all the time.
> >
> > > > Woman or Not, all the same in regards to the 7 Year Itch!
> >
> > > itch this butter lips
> >
> > NOPE, Spoken for, and your Anal Retentive Crap doesn't mean Shi'ite, to
> > a Banshee!
> > We are the Pale Riders, whose NAME, "IS "DEATH"! who the Fuck are YOU!
> ==========================
> The tragedy is that you could be a useful woman,
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 12, 2012, 1:11:01 AM10/12/12
to
Which is Why you CAN be my Equal, but I BOW to No MAN!
To put your Whip Away, or find out what it's like to have a Pony Tail, when
your Whip, gets shoved up YOUR Ass!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 12, 2012, 1:13:09 AM10/12/12
to
captain crunch wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 8:16 AM, % wrote:
> >
> >
> > Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole wrote:
> >> "%" wrote:
> >>
> >>> Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole wrote:
> >>>> Old Jinglebollocks wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Just briefly, I'd like to say that when you love a woman, it is
> >>>>> better not to live with her all the time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Woman or Not, all the same in regards to the 7 Year Itch!
> >>>
> >>> itch this butter lips
> >>
> >> NOPE, Spoken for, and your Anal Retentive Crap doesn't mean Shi'ite,
> >> to a Banshee!
> >> We are the Pale Riders, whose NAME, "IS "DEATH"! who the Fuck are YOU!
> >
> >
> > you're nothing but a basic human like everybody else
>
> <dd8h489tad2rum2ru...@4ax.com>
>
> after I wake up from my nap I'll have the time to read your lengthy
> rant......snip!
Den!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 12, 2012, 1:13:56 AM10/12/12
to
%
Oct 12, 2012, 12:36:45 PM10/12/12
to
%
Oct 12, 2012, 12:37:12 PM10/12/12
to
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 13, 2012, 1:28:45 AM10/13/12
to
You do, which is My Needles Point, Haystack!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 13, 2012, 1:29:41 AM10/13/12
to
YEP, regardless of how Stupid your Joke is!
Tom
Oct 20, 2012, 5:22:49 AM10/20/12
to
I suggest that % and Lady Azure should get married and go and live in
Alaska, and leave us alone to get some serious work done.
Alaska, and leave us alone to get some serious work done.
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 24, 2012, 12:44:48 AM10/24/12
to
Tom wrote:
> I suggest that % and Lady Azure should get married
What the Lady the World calls "MOMMA" Sita, disagreed with the Cyclopes
Over!
I ain't Chattel, your Prize to be awarded at will, or subject to your
Opinion, as to MY Basic Human Desires!
I am Guaranteed the "RIGHT" of "PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS"!
My Country was FOUNDED and FORGED on the Principles the it was made to
"Ensure a More Peaceful Union, ensure Justice and Domestic Tranquility,
We did Here By Establish and Ordain!
They don't like that and have been Tory Brits in Feathers doing the
Florida War Dance for a Long Long Long Time as a Result!
Tom
Oct 25, 2012, 9:01:04 AM10/25/12
to
On 24 Oct, 05:44, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
These futile ancient tribal hatreds gave us thirty years of hell in
Northern Ireland (fuelled by the ruling group for their own agenda).
And it's not over yet.
I suggest the following is helpful.
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/4edbe9891e49b77b?hl=en-GB&&q=the+myth+of+british+imperialism
<laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> They don't like that and have been Tory Brits in Feathers doing the
> Florida War Dance for a Long Long Long Time as a Result!
=====================
> Florida War Dance for a Long Long Long Time as a Result!
These futile ancient tribal hatreds gave us thirty years of hell in
Northern Ireland (fuelled by the ruling group for their own agenda).
And it's not over yet.
I suggest the following is helpful.
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/4edbe9891e49b77b?hl=en-GB&&q=the+myth+of+british+imperialism
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 26, 2012, 2:48:27 AM10/26/12
to
Tom wrote:
> On 24 Oct, 05:44, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
> <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> > They don't like that and have been Tory Brits in Feathers doing the
> > Florida War Dance for a Long Long Long Time as a Result!
>
> =====================
>
> These futile ancient tribal hatreds gave us thirty years of hell in
> Northern Ireland
Tom
Dec 3, 2012, 7:17:30 AM12/3/12
to
On Oct 26, 6:48 am, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
--------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not an Anglican and I'm not a Catholic.
I side with Paul Brunton's analysis of the nature of the universe.
You are filled with repressed rage.
You could be a useful person if your repressed rage were channelled in
the direction of healing our tragic civilisation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Careless Hands (that can't hold on to love)
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dddp6bt4_187gpmt3sjh
I'm not an Anglican and I'm not a Catholic.
I side with Paul Brunton's analysis of the nature of the universe.
You are filled with repressed rage.
You could be a useful person if your repressed rage were channelled in
the direction of healing our tragic civilisation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Careless Hands (that can't hold on to love)
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dddp6bt4_187gpmt3sjh
Special Care
Dec 3, 2012, 7:38:31 AM12/3/12
to
Some readers of these pages are familiar with my healing document of
the above title.
This is one of a series of healing writings I have produced since
April 2003, when I began to obtain deeper insights into the true
nature of the mother-infant relationship and how it connects with the
overall analysis of the human condition and the long-term healing
formula toward which that analysis points.
The healing document titled "Your Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes,
Mrs !" has been "flagged" as "inappropriate" by someone, and is now
unavailable for public viewing pending a google review.
For the record, the following is the text of that document, with
verbal descriptions of the images in parentheses [].
==========================
YOUR BABY IS NOT A SACK OF POTATOES, MRS !
[image of Oxana Malaya, crouching on fallen tree trunk in canine
sitting pose]
Ladies, answer the question, please....
The human species will never heal until every woman faces this
question and answers it:
[image of mother changing baby's diaper/nappy, bending over baby
exchanging loving eye contact and smiles of delight, baby's penis and
scrotum visible]
-----------------------------------------------
The question is
this:
For the sake of discussion, suppose a beautiful young lady were to
gently and lovingly caress your anus several times daily for
several months, and to lean over you exchanging loving eye contact
and
smiles of delight with you as she pleasures you in your anus... well
then what would your emotions and impulses be toward that young
lady?
-----------------------------------------------
You know the
answer.
-----------------------------------------------
THAT IS WHAT EVERY HUMAN INFANT
EXPERIENCES..........
THAT IS HOW EVERY HUMAN INFANT FEELS TOWARD HIS OR HER
MOTHER
[repeat previous image for emphasis]
Face it or be damned
[image of same mother and baby, at later stage of 'changing,' penis
and scrotum not visible]
Part of my contribution to healing is to impress upon
mothers that when one human being touches another human being's anus,
this is a powerful and intense experience for the person being
touched on that delightful part of our
bodies.
As part of the healing process, we have to STOP excluding babies
from our awareness of this powerful act of love and to accept the
intensity of the baby's physical and emotional experience as
the
mother touches his or her anus. We have to deal with this
unavoidable loving interaction and its lifelong legacy - on
a basis of rationality and compassion, after we exit survivalist
mode and no longer need to torment and reject our babies to turn them
into soldier material.
Acknowledge the true significance of all these images, and then we
can
recover our sanity and go back to the Garden.
===========================================================================
=
[Image of mother or doctor or nurse with naked baby, probably
involving anal eroticism]
[image of baby from waist up, with blissful smile, probably resulting
from anal eroticism in mother-infant relationship]
[repeat of first image described above]
Face it or be damned
[repeat of second image described above]
A baby is not a sack of potatoes, which is what women obviously
believe babies are.
A baby is a human being who experiences being caressed on his or her
anus in exactly the same way as YOU experience being caressed on your
anus.
When the mother denies that, she wrecks her baby and she wrecks our
civilisation.
[image of mother breastfeeding two children, apparently twins, aged
perhaps six to eight years, fully clothed]
[image of mother breastfeeding child, aged perhaps nine years, fully
clothed]
If you still can't see this,
JUST SCREW YOUR HEAD BACK ONTO YOUR NECK
and make the connections between the following
images:
[repeat second image of this document]
[image of baby, aged perhaps two years, pulling back of mother's
bikini bottom off her buttocks as if to search for mother's anus]
[image of child, aged perhaps three or four, peering up back of
mother's skirt, as if to search for mother's anus]
It helps if you read
"Silence of the Damned" / "I Still Miss Someone" / "The Shame" etc.
in conjunction with this present document.
If only we would leave out the toxic shame [=universal child abuse],
babies would automatically seek out Mummy's anus
and strive to return Mummy's love
by giving Mummy the same pleasure in her anus
as she has been giving to baby in his anus.
The toxic shame wrecks your baby
and from then on we're all on the wrong track.
Face it or be damned.
Look again at these images,
and make the connection.
Your baby is not a sack of potatoes, Mrs!
[repeat second image of this document]
[repeat the previous two images of small children grasping mother's
clothing as if to search for mother's anus]
And if you STILL can't see it yet... here is another clue for you:
Oxana Malaya video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyqbnDjId7g
[repeat previous image of Oxana Malaya]
========================================================
Explanatory Note:
In my healing writings, such as "Your Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes,
Mrs !" and others,
I use images of naked babies taken from publicly available
educational / childcare websites.
This is necessary for educational and healing purposes.
In my earlier efforts, I used text only in my educational / healing
writings.
When it became clear that text alone was making little impression on
readers, I saw
that images of the mother-infant relationship in action were needed
to
bring the analysis and healing message alive in the reader's
imagination and to convey
the reality of what actually goes on in the mother-infant
relationship.
This is a healing project, and the use of publicly available images
of
mothers and babies
is essential for educational / healing purposes in this context.
========================================================
Return to main articles list:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dddp6bt4_829zpt8ffd
========================================================
Additional reading [different authors, for information]:
http://www.womanthouartgod.com/breastfeedinglovemaking.php
END OF TEXT COPY OF "YOUR BABY IS NOT A SACK OF POTATOES, MRS !" WITH
ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGES DESCRIBED IN PARENTHESES.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
COMMENT FROM PETER NEWMAN:
I am largely neutral in this.
I have offered you that analysis of your condition and the long-term
healing formula toward which it points.
If you reject it I will be disappointed but accept your decision that
you prefer to retain your pain-generating, love-rationing societal
arrangements and do not wish even to express a long-term aspiration
to
restore decency and caring to the mother-infant relationship with a
view to ending human suffering.
If you are so deeply sunk in your collective mental illness that you
think my efforts to help you to heal are "inappropriate," I ask you
not to take the cowards way out by clicking on a link to Google to
'indicate' that something is "inappropritate," but instead talk to me
on the telephone and explain to me what I supposedly have done wrong.
respectfully,
-Pete
Telephone +44-7951916766
the above title.
This is one of a series of healing writings I have produced since
April 2003, when I began to obtain deeper insights into the true
nature of the mother-infant relationship and how it connects with the
overall analysis of the human condition and the long-term healing
formula toward which that analysis points.
The healing document titled "Your Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes,
Mrs !" has been "flagged" as "inappropriate" by someone, and is now
unavailable for public viewing pending a google review.
For the record, the following is the text of that document, with
verbal descriptions of the images in parentheses [].
==========================
YOUR BABY IS NOT A SACK OF POTATOES, MRS !
[image of Oxana Malaya, crouching on fallen tree trunk in canine
sitting pose]
Ladies, answer the question, please....
The human species will never heal until every woman faces this
question and answers it:
[image of mother changing baby's diaper/nappy, bending over baby
exchanging loving eye contact and smiles of delight, baby's penis and
scrotum visible]
-----------------------------------------------
The question is
this:
For the sake of discussion, suppose a beautiful young lady were to
gently and lovingly caress your anus several times daily for
several months, and to lean over you exchanging loving eye contact
and
smiles of delight with you as she pleasures you in your anus... well
then what would your emotions and impulses be toward that young
lady?
-----------------------------------------------
You know the
answer.
-----------------------------------------------
THAT IS WHAT EVERY HUMAN INFANT
EXPERIENCES..........
THAT IS HOW EVERY HUMAN INFANT FEELS TOWARD HIS OR HER
MOTHER
[repeat previous image for emphasis]
Face it or be damned
[image of same mother and baby, at later stage of 'changing,' penis
and scrotum not visible]
Part of my contribution to healing is to impress upon
mothers that when one human being touches another human being's anus,
this is a powerful and intense experience for the person being
touched on that delightful part of our
bodies.
As part of the healing process, we have to STOP excluding babies
from our awareness of this powerful act of love and to accept the
intensity of the baby's physical and emotional experience as
the
mother touches his or her anus. We have to deal with this
unavoidable loving interaction and its lifelong legacy - on
a basis of rationality and compassion, after we exit survivalist
mode and no longer need to torment and reject our babies to turn them
into soldier material.
Acknowledge the true significance of all these images, and then we
can
recover our sanity and go back to the Garden.
===========================================================================
=
[Image of mother or doctor or nurse with naked baby, probably
involving anal eroticism]
[image of baby from waist up, with blissful smile, probably resulting
from anal eroticism in mother-infant relationship]
[repeat of first image described above]
Face it or be damned
[repeat of second image described above]
A baby is not a sack of potatoes, which is what women obviously
believe babies are.
A baby is a human being who experiences being caressed on his or her
anus in exactly the same way as YOU experience being caressed on your
anus.
When the mother denies that, she wrecks her baby and she wrecks our
civilisation.
[image of mother breastfeeding two children, apparently twins, aged
perhaps six to eight years, fully clothed]
[image of mother breastfeeding child, aged perhaps nine years, fully
clothed]
If you still can't see this,
JUST SCREW YOUR HEAD BACK ONTO YOUR NECK
and make the connections between the following
images:
[repeat second image of this document]
[image of baby, aged perhaps two years, pulling back of mother's
bikini bottom off her buttocks as if to search for mother's anus]
[image of child, aged perhaps three or four, peering up back of
mother's skirt, as if to search for mother's anus]
It helps if you read
"Silence of the Damned" / "I Still Miss Someone" / "The Shame" etc.
in conjunction with this present document.
If only we would leave out the toxic shame [=universal child abuse],
babies would automatically seek out Mummy's anus
and strive to return Mummy's love
by giving Mummy the same pleasure in her anus
as she has been giving to baby in his anus.
The toxic shame wrecks your baby
and from then on we're all on the wrong track.
Face it or be damned.
Look again at these images,
and make the connection.
Your baby is not a sack of potatoes, Mrs!
[repeat second image of this document]
[repeat the previous two images of small children grasping mother's
clothing as if to search for mother's anus]
And if you STILL can't see it yet... here is another clue for you:
Oxana Malaya video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyqbnDjId7g
[repeat previous image of Oxana Malaya]
========================================================
Explanatory Note:
In my healing writings, such as "Your Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes,
Mrs !" and others,
I use images of naked babies taken from publicly available
educational / childcare websites.
This is necessary for educational and healing purposes.
In my earlier efforts, I used text only in my educational / healing
writings.
When it became clear that text alone was making little impression on
readers, I saw
that images of the mother-infant relationship in action were needed
to
bring the analysis and healing message alive in the reader's
imagination and to convey
the reality of what actually goes on in the mother-infant
relationship.
This is a healing project, and the use of publicly available images
of
mothers and babies
is essential for educational / healing purposes in this context.
========================================================
Return to main articles list:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dddp6bt4_829zpt8ffd
========================================================
Additional reading [different authors, for information]:
http://www.womanthouartgod.com/breastfeedinglovemaking.php
END OF TEXT COPY OF "YOUR BABY IS NOT A SACK OF POTATOES, MRS !" WITH
ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGES DESCRIBED IN PARENTHESES.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
COMMENT FROM PETER NEWMAN:
I am largely neutral in this.
I have offered you that analysis of your condition and the long-term
healing formula toward which it points.
If you reject it I will be disappointed but accept your decision that
you prefer to retain your pain-generating, love-rationing societal
arrangements and do not wish even to express a long-term aspiration
to
restore decency and caring to the mother-infant relationship with a
view to ending human suffering.
If you are so deeply sunk in your collective mental illness that you
think my efforts to help you to heal are "inappropriate," I ask you
not to take the cowards way out by clicking on a link to Google to
'indicate' that something is "inappropritate," but instead talk to me
on the telephone and explain to me what I supposedly have done wrong.
respectfully,
-Pete
Telephone +44-7951916766
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 4, 2012, 3:42:37 AM12/4/12
to
Tom wrote:
> On Oct 26, 6:48 am, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
> <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> > Tom wrote:
> > > On 24 Oct, 05:44, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
> > > <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> > > > They don't like that and have been Tory Brits in Feathers doing the
> > > > Florida War Dance for a Long Long Long Time as a Result!
> >
> > > =====================
> >
> > > These futile ancient tribal hatreds gave us thirty years of hell in
> > > Northern Ireland
> >
> > Anglican's like you oughta know!
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm not an Anglican and I'm not a Catholic.
>
> I side with Paul Brunton's analysis of the nature of the universe.
>
> You are filled with repressed rage.
I Let it Go, you won't like it!
However the ID is walking anyway.
%
Dec 4, 2012, 10:18:32 AM12/4/12
to
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 6, 2012, 1:35:38 AM12/6/12
to
You, are SO "VERY", WRONG!
%
Dec 6, 2012, 10:40:00 AM12/6/12
to
no i'm not
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 10, 2012, 12:39:21 AM12/10/12
to
YES YA ARE!
Willful Illiteracy to Harass and Stalk a Person is not Socially Acceptable
Conduct!
Hunting Fag's, ain't a RIGHT!
GOD, did NOT say "KILL", rather gave No Exception to the LAW, including the
Mighty Hunters.
"For Every Stag a man shall take from the Field, "he" shall replace!
"%" wrote:
> no i'm not
Are 2!
D2 even, especially given your sock patrol. . .
Willful Illiteracy to Harass and Stalk a Person is not Socially Acceptable
Conduct!
Hunting Fag's, ain't a RIGHT!
GOD, did NOT say "KILL", rather gave No Exception to the LAW, including the
Mighty Hunters.
"For Every Stag a man shall take from the Field, "he" shall replace!
"%" wrote:
> no i'm not
Are 2!
D2 even, especially given your sock patrol. . .
%
Dec 9, 2012, 10:53:34 PM12/9/12
to
which god said that there are so many now
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 11, 2012, 3:30:54 AM12/11/12
to
"%" wrote:
> which god said that there are so many now
>
Your contrived Cross Posted Word Game makes no Sense, except to you.
%
Dec 11, 2012, 12:24:22 PM12/11/12
to
yes it does
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 13, 2012, 12:42:07 AM12/13/12
to
"%" wrote:
> yes it does
YEP, it DOES, Regardless of WHAT, "You" say!
>
>
> Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole wrote:
> > "%" wrote:
> >
> >> which god said that there are so many now
> >
> >>
> >
> > Wouldn't Know!
> > Your contrived Cross Posted Word Game makes no Sense, except to you.
> >
>
> >>>>>>>
%
Dec 13, 2012, 2:07:36 AM12/13/12
to
everything does what i say now go ahead and reply
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 14, 2012, 1:20:18 AM12/14/12
to
You "AIN'T" ME!
Tom
Dec 14, 2012, 12:05:56 PM12/14/12
to
I suggest Mr/Mrs % and Lady Azure should get married.
Then, with the two of them barricaded in their honeymoon suite,
fucking and sucking and licking each other all day and all night, we
might get a bit of peace around here.
Then, with the two of them barricaded in their honeymoon suite,
fucking and sucking and licking each other all day and all night, we
might get a bit of peace around here.
conway caine
Dec 14, 2012, 12:53:48 PM12/14/12
to
"Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole" wrote in message
news:576dnXwgaJy5WFfN...@posted.mtasolutions...
You "AIN'T" ME!
***Oh?
"Ask not for whom the bell tolls"
0 new messages