Beginning of suppression / censorship? / "Your Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes, Mrs !"
Old Jinglebollocks
the above title.
This is one of a series of healing writings I have produced since
April 2003, when I began to obtain deeper insights into the true
nature of the mother-infant relationship and how it connects with the
overall analysis of the human condition and the long-term healing
formula toward which that analysis points.
The healing document titled "Your Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes,
Mrs !" has been "flagged" as "inappropriate" by someone, and is now
unavailable for public viewing pending a google review.
For the record, the following is the text of that document, with
verbal descriptions of the images in parentheses [].
==========================
YOUR BABY IS NOT A SACK OF POTATOES, MRS !
[image of Oxana Malaya, crouching on fallen tree trunk in canine
sitting pose]
Ladies, answer the question, please....
The human species will never heal until every woman faces this
question and answers it:
[image of mother changing baby's diaper/nappy, bending over baby
exchanging loving eye contact and smiles of delight, baby's penis and
scrotum visible]
-----------------------------------------------
The question is
this:
For the sake of discussion, suppose a beautiful young lady were to
gently and lovingly caress your anus several times daily for
several months, and to lean over you exchanging loving eye contact and
smiles of delight with you as she pleasures you in your anus... well
then what would your emotions and impulses be toward that young
lady?
-----------------------------------------------
You know the
answer.
-----------------------------------------------
THAT IS WHAT EVERY HUMAN INFANT
EXPERIENCES..........
THAT IS HOW EVERY HUMAN INFANT FEELS TOWARD HIS OR HER
MOTHER
[repeat previous image for emphasis]
Face it or be damned
[image of same mother and baby, at later stage of 'changing,' penis
and scrotum not visible]
Part of my contribution to healing is to impress upon
mothers that when one human being touches another human being's anus,
this is a powerful and intense experience for the person being
touched on that delightful part of our
bodies.
As part of the healing process, we have to STOP excluding babies
from our awareness of this powerful act of love and to accept the
intensity of the baby's physical and emotional experience as the
mother touches his or her anus. We have to deal with this
unavoidable loving interaction and its lifelong legacy - on
a basis of rationality and compassion, after we exit survivalist
mode and no longer need to torment and reject our babies to turn them
into soldier material.
Acknowledge the true significance of all these images, and then we can
recover our sanity and go back to the Garden.
============================================================================
[Image of mother or doctor or nurse with naked baby, probably
involving anal eroticism]
[image of baby from waist up, with blissful smile, probably resulting
from anal eroticism in mother-infant relationship]
[repeat of first image described above]
Face it or be damned
[repeat of second image described above]
A baby is not a sack of potatoes, which is what women obviously
believe babies are.
A baby is a human being who experiences being caressed on his or her
anus in exactly the same way as YOU experience being caressed on your
anus.
When the mother denies that, she wrecks her baby and she wrecks our
civilisation.
[image of mother breastfeeding two children, apparently twins, aged
perhaps six to eight years, fully clothed]
[image of mother breastfeeding child, aged perhaps nine years, fully
clothed]
If you still can't see this,
JUST SCREW YOUR HEAD BACK ONTO YOUR NECK
and make the connections between the following
images:
[repeat second image of this document]
[image of baby, aged perhaps two years, pulling back of mother's
bikini bottom off her buttocks as if to search for mother's anus]
[image of child, aged perhaps three or four, peering up back of
mother's skirt, as if to search for mother's anus]
It helps if you read
"Silence of the Damned" / "I Still Miss Someone" / "The Shame" etc.
in conjunction with this present document.
If only we would leave out the toxic shame [=universal child abuse],
babies would automatically seek out Mummy's anus
and strive to return Mummy's love
by giving Mummy the same pleasure in her anus
as she has been giving to baby in his anus.
The toxic shame wrecks your baby
and from then on we're all on the wrong track.
Face it or be damned.
Look again at these images,
and make the connection.
Your baby is not a sack of potatoes, Mrs!
[repeat second image of this document]
[repeat the previous two images of small children grasping mother's
clothing as if to search for mother's anus]
And if you STILL can't see it yet... here is another clue for you:
Oxana Malaya video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyqbnDjId7g
[repeat previous image of Oxana Malaya]
========================================================
Explanatory Note:
In my healing writings, such as "Your Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes,
Mrs !" and others,
I use images of naked babies taken from publicly available
educational / childcare websites.
This is necessary for educational and healing purposes.
In my earlier efforts, I used text only in my educational / healing
writings.
When it became clear that text alone was making little impression on
readers, I saw
that images of the mother-infant relationship in action were needed
to
bring the analysis and healing message alive in the reader's
imagination and to convey
the reality of what actually goes on in the mother-infant
relationship.
This is a healing project, and the use of publicly available images of
mothers and babies
is essential for educational / healing purposes in this context.
========================================================
Return to main articles list:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dddp6bt4_829zpt8ffd
========================================================
Additional reading [different authors, for information]:
http://www.womanthouartgod.com/breastfeedinglovemaking.php
END OF TEXT COPY OF "YOUR BABY IS NOT A SACK OF POTATOES, MRS !" WITH
ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGES DESCRIBED IN PARENTHESES.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
COMMENT FROM PETER NEWMAN:
I am largely neutral in this.
I have offered you that analysis of your condition and the long-term
healing formula toward which it points.
If you reject it I will be disappointed but accept your decision that
you prefer to retain your pain-generating, love-rationing societal
arrangements and do not wish even to express a long-term aspiration to
restore decency and caring to the mother-infant relationship with a
view to ending human suffering.
If you are so deeply sunk in your collective mental illness that you
think my efforts to help you to heal are "inappropriate," I ask you
not to take the cowards way out by clicking on a link to Google to
'indicate' that something is "inappropritate," but instead talk to me
on the telephone and explain to me what I supposedly have done wrong.
respectfully,
-Pete
Telephone +44-7951916766
Special Care
by councils, social services, feminists, anti-porn campaigners and so
on, because it is a smokescreen to hide behind when you know that if
you are asked to state your case, you will not have a leg to stand on
and will make a fool of your self.
To say that my healing document "Your Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes,
Mrs !" is 'inappropriate' is a bit like Frank Pakenham in the 1970s
solemnly declaring:
"All right-thinking people will be offended by this..."
Again the same sneaky, lazy, cowardly smokescreen of verbiage to hide
behind, to avoid stating his case.
No definition of what a 'right-thinking person' is, nor any evidence
of how many of these 'right thinking people' exist; no rational, fact-
based, evidence-based arguments as to what is actually wrong with the
material he and his sidekick Mrs Whitehouse were referring to and why
it should be deemed 'offensive' to 'right-thinking people.'
And so it is with the sneaky, cowardly person who clicked on some link
to say to Google that my healing document "Your Baby is not a Sack of
Potatoes, Mrs !" is 'inappropriate.'
If the person concerned is reading here, I ask him or her to come out
from behind her/his smokescreen and debate me publicly here on the
content of that healing document, as reproduced above in text form
with verbal descriptions of the illustrations.
-Pete.
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh
wrote:
You go out of your way to be rude and provocative. You chose to
cross
post this to alt.bible and alt.apolcalypse perhaps in the hope
of generating some irate responses. You chose to do this.
Then you reacted all indignantly when someone complained.
I did not click that complaint link. What is the point?
I am also not surprised that someone else did.
I am also not surprised that no one wants to "debate" with you.
That is utterly pointless.
You live in your own daft weird world with its own silly rules.
If you insist on behaving like the usenet equivalent of a pub drunk,
where, despite the best efforts of most people to ignore you, you
insist on shouting at complete strangers, regardless of what they are
talking about, then seriously, what do you expect?
Are you that desperate for attention??
Special Care
<victorburgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You go out of your way to be rude and provocative. You chose to
> cross
> post this to alt.bible and alt.apolcalypse perhaps in the hope
> of generating some irate responses. You chose to do this.
> Then you reacted all indignantly when someone complained.
> I did not click that complaint link. What is the point?
> I am also not surprised that someone else did.
> I am also not surprised that no one wants to "debate" with you.
> That is utterly pointless.
> You live in your own daft weird world with its own silly rules.
>
> If you insist on behaving like the usenet equivalent of a pub drunk,
> where, despite the best efforts of most people to ignore you, you
> insist on shouting at complete strangers, regardless of what they are
> talking about, then seriously, what do you expect?
>
> Are you that desperate for attention??
---------------------
I imagine the person who clicked the complaint link is some new reader
who saw the images and was scared witless on account of remembering
all the government terrorism stories about dawn raids on people
suspected of having child porn on their computers and people losing
their jobs and their marriages and their homes because some image is
on their computer..... and the person concerned was unable to discern
that these are healing/educational documents, and the related fact
that every mother in the world is a paedophile, by our agreed
definitions, etc.
I live in a different world with different rules, yes, because I have
recovered the memories of the forgotten horrors of the later stage of
the mother-infant relationship.
Readers of alt.bible should be able to relate to this, bearing in mind
the advice of Apollonius-Jesus:
"...become as little children..."
You are only half a man if you don't remember your infancy.
Try looking at that biopic of Bobby Darin, "Beyond the Sea," as an
introductory lesson in acknowledging the role played in your life by
the infant you once were [just a vague introductory lesson, preferably
for those who remember Bobby].
I don't need attention personally.
To every action there is a reaction.
A healing current has been striving to enter this world, particularly
since the 1960s, as a reaction to thousands of years of imbecility.
If you have your head screwed on and if your heart is alive, you will
flow with that healing current.
The 1960s affair was grotesquely distorted, due to our inexperience of
healing currents.
I'm getting better at it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Collective Mental Illness"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.uk.law/msg/2c9131e4a118f802
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh
wrote:
> On Nov 30, 4:15 pm, "Augustus O'Muircheartaigh"
>
>
>
> <victorburgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You go out of your way to be rude and provocative. You chose to
> > cross
> > post this to alt.bible and alt.apolcalypse perhaps in the hope
> > of generating some irate responses. You chose to do this.
> > Then you reacted all indignantly when someone complained.
> > I did not click that complaint link. What is the point?
> > I am also not surprised that someone else did.
> > I am also not surprised that no one wants to "debate" with you.
> > That is utterly pointless.
> > You live in your own daft weird world with its own silly rules.
>
> > If you insist on behaving like the usenet equivalent of a pub drunk,
> > where, despite the best efforts of most people to ignore you, you
> > insist on shouting at complete strangers, regardless of what they are
> > talking about, then seriously, what do you expect?
>
> > Are you that desperate for attention??
>
> ---------------------
>
> I imagine the person who clicked the complaint link is some new reader
> who saw the images and was scared witless on account of remembering
> all the government terrorism stories about dawn raids on people
It is probably much much simpler than that.
They probably just thought you were a crossposting wanker.
The only reason you use those images is to attract attention because
you think they are provocative.
You asked for attention and then whine when someone says fuck off.
Special Care
<victorburgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 11:43 pm, Special Care <special.car...@googlemail.com>
>
> > I imagine the person who clicked the complaint link is some new reader
> > who saw the images and was scared witless on account of remembering
> > all the government terrorism stories about dawn raids on people
>
> It is probably much much simpler than that.
> They probably just thought you were a crossposting wanker.
> The only reason you use those images is to attract attention because
> you think they are provocative.
> You asked for attention and then whine when someone says fuck off.
-------------------------------
Crossposting to alt.apocalypse was equally valid and logical.
A major element in my message is the need to think of what the
survivor groups are going to do after the coming collapse, and yes
your civilisation is going to collapse soon.
http://www.endciv.com/
I've been saying the survivor groups have to straighten out the mother-
infant relationship as they rebuild.
The time to prepare for that is now, by recovering the memories of the
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh
wrote:
> On Dec 1, 9:14 am, "Augustus O'Muircheartaigh"
>
> <victorburgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 11:43 pm, Special Care <special.car...@googlemail.com>
> > > ---------------------
>
> > > I imagine the person who clicked the complaint link is some new reader
> > > who saw the images and was scared witless on account of remembering
> > > all the government terrorism stories about dawn raids on people
>
> > It is probably much much simpler than that.
> > They probably just thought you were a crossposting wanker.
> > The only reason you use those images is to attract attention because
> > you think they are provocative.
> > You asked for attention and then whine when someone says fuck off.
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Crossposting to alt.apocalypse was equally valid and logical.
> A major element in my message is the need to think of what the
> survivor groups are going to do after the coming collapse, and yes
> I've been saying the survivor groups have to straighten out the mother-
> infant relationship as they rebuild.
> The time to prepare for that is now, by recovering the memories of the
> later stage of the mother-infant relationship.
Is this a better quality prediction than your one that said that Tony
Blair was going to be dictator of the new Europe?
You should get a new hobby.
Special Care
> > Crossposting to alt.apocalypse was equally valid and logical.
> > A major element in my message is the need to think of what the
> > survivor groups are going to do after the coming collapse, and yes
> > your civilisation is going to collapse soon.http://www.endciv.com/
> > I've been saying the survivor groups have to straighten out the mother-
> > infant relationship as they rebuild.
> > The time to prepare for that is now, by recovering the memories of the
> > later stage of the mother-infant relationship.
>
> Is this a better quality prediction than your one that said that Tony
> Blair was going to be dictator of the new Europe?
> You should get a new hobby.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You always concentrate on the non-essential.
Maybe he will be president of europe later, but that is non-essential
and my intention was convey the message:
"....IRELAND BRIEFLY A NATION BE A PROVINCE ONCE AGAIN..."
By the way, that Derrick Jensen video I inserted above - it's slightly
helpful, but not a lot.
He's a bit like you. He thinks he's clever.
We'll never get anywhere with that attitude.
Oxana Malaya came to us to explain to us that we are not clever, we
are largely automatons.
Oxana Malaya is our saviour more than anyone else is.
Love her. Thank her. I do.
Oxana is saying to us vividly what I've been saying as best I could
since 2003:
progress means CHANGING what we are IMITATING and REPEATING.
=PROGRESS MEANS CHANGING THE MOTHER-INFANT RELATIONSHIP.
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh
wrote:
> On Dec 1, 11:38 am, "Augustus O'Muircheartaigh"
>
> <victorburgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 1, 11:12 am, Special Care <special.car...@googlemail.com>
> > > Crossposting to alt.apocalypse was equally valid and logical.
> > > A major element in my message is the need to think of what the
> > > survivor groups are going to do after the coming collapse, and yes
> > > your civilisation is going to collapse soon.http://www.endciv.com/
> > > I've been saying the survivor groups have to straighten out the mother-
> > > infant relationship as they rebuild.
> > > The time to prepare for that is now, by recovering the memories of the
> > > later stage of the mother-infant relationship.
>
> > Is this a better quality prediction than your one that said that Tony
> > Blair was going to be dictator of the new Europe?
> > You should get a new hobby.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You always concentrate on the non-essential.
All facts are non-essential to you. You use them as long as you think
no one knows anything about them and then stop abruptly as soon as you
get called up on them.
Without facts in this case, all you have is your opinion that the EU
is bad.
That is a valid opinion and you are perfectly entitled to it just as I
am entitled to hold opposing views.
> Maybe he will be president of europe later, but that is non-essential
> and my intention was convey the message:
> "....IRELAND BRIEFLY A NATION BE A PROVINCE ONCE AGAIN..."
>
> By the way, that Derrick Jensen video I inserted above - it's slightly
> helpful, but not a lot.
> He's a bit like you. He thinks he's clever.
The older I get, the more I realise how little I actually know.
I also realise how little lots of others know.
Special Care
<victorburgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 1, 11:51 pm, Special Care <special.car...@googlemail.com>
>
>
> > You always concentrate on the non-essential.
>
> All facts are non-essential to you. You use them as long as you think
> no one knows anything about them and then stop abruptly as soon as you
> get called up on them.
>
> Without facts in this case, all you have is your opinion that the EU
> is bad.
> That is a valid opinion and you are perfectly entitled to it just as I
> am entitled to hold opposing views.
>
> > Maybe he will be president of europe later, but that is non-essential
> > and my intention was convey the message:
> > "....IRELAND BRIEFLY A NATION BE A PROVINCE ONCE AGAIN..."
>
> > By the way, that Derrick Jensen video I inserted above - it's slightly
> > helpful, but not a lot.
> > He's a bit like you. He thinks he's clever.
>
> The older I get, the more I realise how little I actually know.
> I also realise how little lots of others know.
===============
The beauty of the analysis and healing formula I deal in is that it
reveals that life is simple, the analysis of the human condition is
simple, the long-term healing formula is simple, intelligible to all
without need of seeking approval from priests or "experts." All we
need are the basics of human psychology and the basic outline of what
history and geology tell us, then just join the pieces together.
There are plenty of non-essential facts and we can weave fascinating
debates in vast intellectual compartments.
Interesting, but non-essential, especially at this time of crisis when
healing our collective mental illness is what we should be
concentrating on, especially as the collapse of civilisation is
inevitable through unsustainable "development" based on the ever
increasing build up of "animal tested" [untested] poisons, so that we
should be giving a lot of thought now to what we are going to do after
the collapse, and it's refreshing to hear people discussing that in
the David Jensen video mentioned above, as most people refuse to
respond at all to the question of what we are going to do after the
coming collapse.
The following was an attempt to state concisely those core essential
truths. Life is simple:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Collective Mental Illness"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.uk.law/msg/5b3a7564845b3cc3
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh
> Interesting, but non-essential, especially at this time of crisis when
> healing our collective mental illness is what we should be
> concentrating on, especially as the collapse of civilisation is
> inevitable through unsustainable "development" based on the ever
> increasing build up of "animal tested" [untested] poisons, so that we
> should be giving a lot of thought now to what we are going to do after
> the collapse, and it's refreshing to hear people discussing that in
> the David Jensen video mentioned above, as most people refuse to
> respond at all to the question of what we are going to do after the
> coming collapse.
James Joyce would have been proud of you. The above stream of
conciousness attempt was all one meandering sentence. You seem to be
hitting the wine early this evening??
Special Care
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-xRRZUeC9A&feature=related
Special Care
> Dear Peter,
>
> I'm sorry to hear that your google document article entitled "Your
> Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes, Mrs !" has been "flagged" as
> "inappropriate" by someone, and is now unavailable for public viewing
> pending a google review.
>
> perhaps you can pay for another blogging service. I don't expect
> you'd have to pay much but it'll, at least, give you security.
>
> I'm actually sympathetic to you here. You have a right to freedom of
> expression. As you pointed out, the photos you displayed on the
> google document, and which you described on a usenet post
> subsequently, were not provocative. You used images of naked babies
> taken from publicly available educational / childcare websites for
> example.
-------------------------
The healing message remains effective in the other documents/links.
Freedom of expression is essential.
When I moved to England in the 1970s, I quickly became aware of how
the Race Relations Act and later similar legislation was being abused
by minority groups as an exoneration of all anti-social behaviour, to
promote the myth that only white male heterosexuals can do anything
wrong and if you are not a white male heterosexual, anyone who
criticises you can be demonised as guilty of racism/sexism/
homophobia...... Today that process is well advanced.
Freedom from false arrest is the other big axiom of democracy.
It's interesting that the British government recently abolished the
concept of an arrestable offence, giving the police carte blanche to
arrest at will.
If you remove the concept of an arrestable offence, you largely
abolish freedom and democracy.
It's been a slow, drip-by-drip process.
A slow-motion coup d'etat.
Flooding Western Europe with immigrants who have no tradition and no
expectation of freedom/democracy - and often an intense hatred of
freedom/democracy - is part of the process of diluting the degree of
freedom we had attained in the 1970s, when the rot set in.
Old Jinglebollocks
wrote:
> On Dec 11, 7:00 pm, Paul Carr <paulcarr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Peter,
>
> > I'm sorry to hear that your google document article entitled "Your
> > Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes, Mrs !" has been "flagged" as
> > "inappropriate" by someone, and is now unavailable for public viewing
> > pending a google review.
>
> > I suggest you re-upload all your articles and photos to blogspot, or
> > perhaps you can pay for another blogging service. I don't expect
> > you'd have to pay much but it'll, at least, give you security.
>
> > I'm actually sympathetic to you here. You have a right to freedom of
> > expression. As you pointed out, the photos you displayed on the
> > google document, and which you described on a usenet post
> > subsequently, were not provocative. You used images of naked babies
> > taken from publicly available educational / childcare websites for
> > example.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Carr appears to have deleted his post, which was retained on my
reply and is reproduced above.
Some of the images which seem to frighten people so much are these:
http://www.painetworks.com/photos/ik/ik1565.JPG
http://www.painetworks.com/photos/ik/ik1563.JPG
My purpose in including them in educational/healing documents was the
same as the purpose of Dale Glabach, Niles Newton, John Beckstrom and
others in educative/healing documents such as this one:
http://www.womanthouartgod.com/breastfeedinglovemaking.php
I was emphasising a Forbidden Subject within a Forbidden Subject -
anal eroticism between mothers and their babies - which people such as
Glabach, Newton, Beckstrom are to grand and haughty to concern
themselves with, but I know just how vitally significant and important
to our healing process is this intense anal eroticism in the mother-
infant relationship.
We urgently need to get this out into the open if we are to heal our
lives and heal our civilisation.
You should stop letting the ruling group make you afraid of using
these images for educational/healing purposes. A picture says more
than a thousand words. The orgasmic smile on this baby's face says it
all, if you know where his smile comes from and what is going on with
this baby:
http://www.verybestbaby.com/images/diaper_intro.jpg
We can't change immediately the way we relate to babies, but it's
imperative to begin the needed re-education/reorientation programme
among adults if we are to heal, and it's essential to utilise these
images to get people to understand the fact that the mother-infant
relationship is a sexual relationship and that by our agreed
definitions every mother in the world is a paedophile.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A related image is this one, which I have used elsewhere. It's freely
available on the web and I included it in some documents to encourage
the dissovling of the toxic shame surrounding defecation, which never
should have arisen and never would arise if our mothers didn't impose
it.
We must respect the sovereignty of other people's bodies and their
wish for privacy at times, but apart from that, the fact is that if
you remove the toxic shame, the vast majority of people will never
want to stop toileting each other after infancy, because it's such
fun:
http://files.myopera.com/lauraf/albums/23665/Potty%20time.jpg
Paul Carr
> On Dec 12 2009, 4:36 am, Special Care <special.car...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 7:00 pm, Paul Carr <paulcarr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Dear Peter,
>>
>>> I'm sorry to hear that your google document article entitled "Your
>>> Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes, Mrs !" has been "flagged" as
>>> "inappropriate" by someone, and is now unavailable for public
>>> viewing pending a google review.
>>
>>> I suggest you re-upload all your articles and photos to blogspot, or
>>> perhaps you can pay for another blogging service. I don't expect
>>> you'd have to pay much but it'll, at least, give you security.
>>
>>> I'm actually sympathetic to you here. You have a right to freedom of
>>> expression. As you pointed out, the photos you displayed on the
>>> google document, and which you described on a usenet post
>>> subsequently, were not provocative. You used images of naked babies
>>> taken from publicly available educational / childcare websites for
>>> example.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Paul Carr appears to have deleted his post, which was retained on my
> reply and is reproduced above.
I didn't delete anything.
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh
> Old Jinglebollocks wrote:
> > On Dec 12 2009, 4:36 am, Special Care <special.car...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On Dec 11, 7:00 pm, Paul Carr <paulcarr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Dear Peter,
>
> >>> I'm sorry to hear that your google document article entitled "Your
> >>> Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes, Mrs !" has been "flagged" as
> >>> "inappropriate" by someone, and is now unavailable for public
> >>> viewing pending a google review.
>
> >>> I suggest you re-upload all your articles and photos to blogspot, or
> >>> perhaps you can pay for another blogging service. I don't expect
> >>> you'd have to pay much but it'll, at least, give you security.
>
> >>> I'm actually sympathetic to you here. You have a right to freedom of
> >>> expression. As you pointed out, the photos you displayed on the
> >>> google document, and which you described on a usenet post
> >>> subsequently, were not provocative. You used images of naked babies
> >>> taken from publicly available educational / childcare websites for
> >>> example.
>
>
> > Paul Carr appears to have deleted his post, which was retained on my
> > reply and is reproduced above.
>
> I didn't delete anything.
>
It was there all along.
Paul Carr
Here's some pics of women to pep up Special Care some.
http://worldpaulcarr.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!2AA66E340D37A86C!2831.entry
Now, if only we had these comely maidens gathering at the crossroads.
Ireland's problems would be solved.
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yhglyao
>
> Now, if only we had these comely maidens gathering at the crossroads.
> Ireland's problems would be solved.
>
Gasp; I wonder would they like to invade Ireland.
eugene
"Augustus O'Muircheartaigh" <victorb...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:69b3bf0b-400a-4540...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
I wonder if they would go into battle dressed like that. bet they would
win.............pants down!
--
And in the end
The love you take
Is equal to the love you make
Special Care
> >http://worldpaulcarr.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!2AA66E340D37A86C!2831.e...
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/yhglyao
>
> > Now, if only we had these comely maidens gathering at the crossroads.
> > Ireland's problems would be solved.
>
> Gasp; I wonder would they like to invade Ireland.
>
> I wonder if they would go into battle dressed like that. bet they would
> win.............pants down!
>
Interesting thought.
Zoologist Desmond Morris in his book "The Human Zoo" mentioned that
when chimpazees are engaged in a territorial dispute, one dominant
male may on occasions decide to defuse the quarrel by turning around
and bending over displaying his rump to his opponent, and the opponent
then mounts him in simulation of coitus, then withdraws, and the
dispute is defused without violence.
Paul Carr
Ah, I think I see what the problem is and what was the cause of the
misunderstanding between Special Care and I in this instance.
I was replying to this post here by Special Care.
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.irish/msg/c6203a52e4cef64b
I decided to strip out the crossposting to alt.apocalypse, alt.bible,
uk.legal and alt.uk.law because I didn't think they were relevant to what I
was writing about. I also decided to delete out all the stuff I was
replying to because it was rather long and I didn't see the point in
reproducing it. Apparently, Special Care was reviewing old posts via
investigating one of the other newsgroups and got confused when he saw that
my post was missing.
My post, by the way, is here:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.irish/msg/2e60c368bb9b90cb
I did not delete it.
Old Jinglebollocks
The images are more prominent than the text and the images were
intended to hit the reader hard, to make a point.
There is a climate of fear in EU/USA now on account of these horror
stories we are hearing about dawn raids and people losing their jobs,
their homes, their marriages, being fined and/or jailed, and even
kicked to death by vigiliantes, all because someone stole their credit
card details and downloaded child porn.
The images I used in that document were erroneously confused with
child porn and with exploitation of young people by some panicky
person, I suspect female(?).
In fact they are images of maternal love in action, but with the
intention of conveying to the reader the reality of eroticism between
mothers and babies and the contradictions inherent in the superficial
paedo panic.
For now, the same message is conveyed adequately with some of the same
images in two other documents:
Careless Hands
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dddp6bt4_187gpmt3sjh
The Universal Fear of Being Known
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dddp6bt4_188hggbt5f8
Old Jinglebollocks
"I Still Miss Someone" is a long, rambling document, clumsy if you
want to call it that.
Still, it may be helpful to some people out there in a healing way,
even in an interim sense, before the final collective healing of our
civilisation commences.
Some of the said images are in that document, as representations of
maternal love intended as an aid to healing our personal lives and
healing our tragic INVERTED civilisation.
To censor/suppress these healing documents any further would be a
criminal act.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Still Miss Someone (reissued / back up copy)
[text of 2006 unchanged; images renewed]
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_167dqb3cgd3
Old Jinglebollocks
SEND IN THE CLOWNS
Words and Music by Stephen Sondheim
[Judy Collins was the REAL clown, because she didn't know what she was
REALLY singing about.]
Isn't it rich?
Are we a pair?
Me here at last on the ground,
You in mid-air.
Send in the clowns.
Isn't it bliss?
Don't you approve?
One who keeps tearing around,
One who can't move.
Where are the clowns?
Send in the clowns.
Just when I'd stopped
Opening doors,
Finally knowing
The one that I wanted was yours,
Making my entrance again
With my usual flair,
Sure of my lines,
No one is there.
Don't you love farce?
My fault, I fear.
I thought that you'd want what I want -
Sorry, my dear.
But where are the clowns?
There ought to be clowns.
Quick, send in the clowns.
Isn't it rich?
Isn't it queer?
Losing my timing this late
In my career?
And where are the clowns?
Quick, send in the clowns.
Don't bother - they're here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shaking the Baby
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_21gvfsbjdd
I Still Miss Someone (reissued / back up copy)
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_167dqb3cgd3
Careless Hands
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dddp6bt4_187gpmt3sjh