Re: MJ=08/29/58,10AM,GARY,IN
Edmond Wollmann
> LOOKING FOR BIRTHCHART.
>
> ALL SITES HAVE CRASHED.
>
> ANYONE HAVE BIRTHCHART?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.jyotish/msg/167b2bff19aa4919?hl=en
A PRE-delineation.
"In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the
silence of our friends." - Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968)
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Articles http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/info.htm
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/TOC.htm
Pack
Edmond Wollmann <AArcto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 5:00=A0pm, ritalo...@webtv.net wrote:
> > LOOKING FOR BIRTHCHART.
> >
> > ALL SITES HAVE CRASHED.
> >
>
> http://www.smbtech.com/ed
URL fixored.
Sofa King
at the same time you also expoz0r3d yourself as a stupid cunt.
A B
There seem to be two different birth times in this - 12:00pm and 06:54 CST.
There is also doubt over whether this is daylight saving time or not. Rita
seems to think it was actually 10am. Can anybody clarify?
A. B.
Sofa King
yeah, i can clarify:
astrology is a waste of energy.
Day Brown
major diff would be the rising sign. All the other bodies move so slow
that several hours would not make a diff.
Whatever the validity of astrology, it provides a nomenclature to
describe normal people, whereas conventional psychology focuses on
pathology, and does not really address the concerns of a normal psyche
confronted with situations and relationships that are also more normal.
To the shrink, everything is pathological. Abnormality is interesting,
so that gets their attention. They dont know anything about Scorpio
lovers. They dunno anything about the metonic cycle either, which you
mite pay attention to watching how events unfold as the 235th moon
approaches, and whether any of the rising signs seems synchronous with
some change in yourself and/or situation.
Psychiatry takes no notice of the fact the Chinese glyph for danger
includes that of opportunity and vice versus. But one of the rising
signs mite be more spiritually resonant on a metonic moon to suggest
whether you'd do better to be more daring, or less so.
Of course, one of the charts mentioned above mite seem more relevant at
any time, and if that explains things to you that work, fine. But if you
get it wrong, nobody is gonna send you to hell, and that dont preclude
getting it right later.
A B
interesting.
A. B.
The Sun
Actually, the most current accepted more accurate time is 11:54 am
CDT.
Edmond Wollmann
> On Jun 30, 2:36 pm, "A B" <a@a> wrote:
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.jyotish/msg/167b2bff19aa4919?hl=en
>
> > There seem to be two different birth times in this - 12:00pm and 06:54 CST.
> > There is also doubt over whether this is daylight saving time or not. Rita
> > seems to think it was actually 10am. Can anybody clarify?
> > A. B.
>
> Actually, the most current accepted more accurate time is 11:54 am
> CDT.
Sorry, I meant pm. They work pretty well when inverted anyway, but the
PM time gives T Moon moving over his Venus in Leo (heart) and T
Mercury squaring Saturn in 4. The New Moon previous had opposed T
Pluto ruling six (health and discernent) which would be the 12th of
the doctor.
There was a big debate about the birthtime here long ago.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astrology.moderated/browse_thread/thread/d92e15e22ba22a79?tvc=2
Pack
Edmond Wollmann <AArcto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 8:32=A0am, The Sun <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
The Sun? The fucking sun?
You really are a buffoon!
Anonymous
Edmond Wollmann <AArcto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 8:32=A0am, The Sun <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Edmond Wollmann
Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org>
Comments:
This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <cripto...@ecn.org>.
Cc:
mail...@dizum.com, mail...@m2n.nymu.eu
References:
<29220-4A4...@bsg-storefull-3111.bay.webtv.net>
<abe29cfc-bbaa-46d6...@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
<4a4a8571$0$24003$db0f...@news.zen.co.uk>
<11b07ae8-a790-4daa...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
<8282e3b6-e17e-44b9...@i8g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
Subject:
Re: MJ=08/29/58,10AM,GARY,IN
Message-Id:
<2009070619063...@www.ecn.org>
Date:
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:06:35 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups:
alt.astrology, alt.astrology.metapsych, alt.psychology
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!mail2news.nymu.eu
X-Abuse-Contact:
ab...@nymu.eu
Lines:
8
Bytes:
1410
Xref:
number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.psychology:91027
alt.astrology.metapsych:230542 alt.astrology:679355
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
� 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Nomen Nescio
Edmond Wollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> From:
> Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org>
Whine some more for us, bitch!
http://www.smbtech.com/ed
Day Brown
> Excuse me, but what's a metonic cycle? Not heard of that. Sounds
> interesting.
the same time of year. The discovery attributed to a mythic Greek named
Metonia. But a few years back, they found a bronze disk in Germany,
IIRC, some 3500 years old, with the relative positions of the sun and
moon inscribed in gold on it making it obvious someone understood the
cycle.
However, I've also read that some believe it to be a fake since it
predates the "bronze age". But in fact, a neolithic copper mine has been
found in Germany from 6500 years ago. So, it could be real. I've not
read of the makeup of the metal, but arsenic bronze artifacts have been
found in the lower Danube area that are 7000 years old.
Cucuteni and Vinca pottery with Runes on it has also been found that is
that old. This is, undoubtedly, where western astrology was invented.
Sofa King
> On Jun 30, 2:36 pm, "A B" <a@a> wrote:
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.jyotish/msg/167b2bff19aa4919?hl=en
>>
>> There seem to be two different birth times in this - 12:00pm and 06:54
>> CST. There is also doubt over whether this is daylight saving time or
>> not. Rita seems to think it was actually 10am. Can anybody clarify?
>> A. B.
>
> Actually, the most current accepted more accurate time is 11:54 am
> CDT.
>
so seconds don't matter?