White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept. 11.....Two hours after the U.S. Consulate came under attack

[MattB]

White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept. 11

Read more:
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2012/Oct-24/192544-emails-white-house-told-of-militant-claim-two-hours-after-libya-attack.ashx


Two hours after the U.S. Consulate came under attack in Benghazi,
Libya, the White House was told that a militant group was claiming
responsibility for the violence that killed the U.S. ambassador and
three other Americans.

A State Department email sent to intelligence officials and the White
House situation room said the Islamist group Ansar al-Sharia claimed
responsibility on Facebook and Twitter, and also called for an attack
on the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli.

The document may fuel Republican efforts to show that the White House
knew it was a terrorist attack, even as the U.S. ambassador to the
United Nations was saying - five days afterward - that it appeared to
be a protest gone awry.

The Obama administration's account of the Benghazi events has become a
campaign issue, with Republican challenger Mitt Romney and Republican
lawmakers accusing the White House of misleading Americans about the
nature of the attack.

The Associated Press and other news organizations obtained the
unclassified email and two related emails from government officials
who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak
about them publicly.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Wednesday that the
review board she appointed to investigate the attack is "looking at
everything," rather than "cherry picking one story here or one
document there."

White House press secretary Jay Carney said the emails represented
just one piece of information the administration was receiving at the
time.


******

White House Responds to Release of Real-Time Emails About Benghazi
Attack

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/white-house-responds-to-release-of-real-time-emails-about-benghazi-attack/

[Phlip]

> White House Responds to Release of Real-Time Emails About Benghazi
> Attack

So... Bush owns the Intel "failures" leading to 9/11, now?

[Matt]

MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ibig881cl06a3hsqd...@4ax.com:

> White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept. 11
>
> Read more:
> http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2012/Oct-24/192544-emails-
> white-house-told-of-militant-claim-two-hours-after-libya-attack.ashx
>
>
> Two hours after the U.S. Consulate came under attack in Benghazi,
> Libya, the White House was told that a militant group was claiming
> responsibility for the violence that killed the U.S. ambassador and
> three other Americans.
>

Claiming responsibility.

Any idea how many people come forward "claiming responsibility" for crimes
each and every day?

How would you respond if they'd immediately leaped forward saying it was a
terrorist act and that the Constitution needed to be suspended, with all
rights removed, until they "cleared things up"?

Oh, wait, that would be the PATRIOT Act...

Matt

[Eddie Haskell]

"Phlip" <phli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a3bc5d7f-7b19-42fc...@a4g2000pbo.googlegroups.com...

>> White House Responds to Release of Real-Time Emails About Benghazi
>> Attack
>
> So... Bush owns the Intel "failures" leading to 9/11, now?

Squirm, bitch. Squirm!

-Eddie Haskell

[R.Dean]

This was a cover-up by the Obama administration of several maginitudes
greater than the Nixon cover-up. Biden denied the any knowledge of a
request for more diplomatic security forces in Libya. Biden's comment
"we weren't told". Yet the administration knew this was a terrorist
attack within two hours of the attack. They were aware of this attack
going on for seven hours yet, did nothing to provide support for the
four Americans who were murdered. Help was only an hour away. Obama went
to the Rose Garden in the AM next day, spoke and then went on a fund
raising campaign. At least with the Nixon cover-up he didn't have blood
on his hands.

[R.Dean]

Bush, no hero of mine, but he was caught by surprise.

[MattB]

Don't get me started on what I think of the patriot act. That or
Obama expansion of his powers in that area.

The changes to the Posse Comitatus Act done by Bush.

The New Imperial Presidency
http://hpronline.org/covers/constitution/the-new-imperial-presidency/

While the Constitution meticulously lays out the workings and duties
of the legislative branch, the founding fathers� commentary on the
executive branch proved significantly more limited. The powers
explicitly granted to the President are wholly contained within
Article II, Section II. Among the few responsibilities listed are
judicial appointments and control over the military.

Today, the Executive Branch plays an increasingly important role in
both foreign and domestic affairs. Not only does the President set his
party�s domestic legislative agenda, he can even commit troops to
conflict abroad without Congressional consent. The growth of
Presidential authority in the ill-defined War on Terror, demonstrated
by President Obama�s controversial targeted killing of American Anwar
al-Awlaki, indicates a need for Congress and the Supreme Court to
check the executive branch�s growing authority.

**********************

The only things lately the 2 parties agree on is there expansion of
power.


>
>Matt

[Matt]

MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:00kg88pipoaqj6csj...@4ax.com:

Exactly.

So you should be happy that for once, someone actually took time to
figure out who was responsible and to determine whether or not a
response was necessary.

Matt

[Milt]

On Oct 24, 1:58 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept. 11
>

> Read more:http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2012/Oct-24/192544-email...

> http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/white-house-responds-to-...

So, we should trust everything al Qaeda says now?

[Milt]

On Oct 24, 2:28 pm, "R.Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 4:06 PM, MattB wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept. 11
>
> > Read more:

> >http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2012/Oct-24/192544-email...

That is beyond stupid.

The next morning after the attack, Obama called it a terror attack.

This "evidence" is basically al Qaeda claiming responsibility. You
call that credible, do ya? Are you saying you believe everything al
Qaeda tells us now? Or might it make sense to, I dunno... do an
investigation, perhaps?

> Biden denied the any knowledge of a
> request for more diplomatic security forces in Libya. Biden's comment
> "we weren't told". Yet the administration knew this was a terrorist
> attack within two hours of the attack. They were aware of this attack
> going on for seven hours yet, did nothing to provide support for the
> four Americans who were murdered. Help was only an hour away. Obama went
> to the Rose Garden in the AM next day, spoke and then went on a fund
> raising campaign. At least with the Nixon cover-up he didn't have blood
> on his hands.
>

That's not true, actually.

Frankly, I think Republicans should be ashamed of themselves for
exploiting this for political advantage. I've never seen anything so
disgusting in my life. And yes, I would have felt the same way of
Democrats had spent the weeks after the original 9/11 had gone after
Bush the same way.

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 3:22 PM, Milt wrote:
>> This was a cover-up by the Obama administration of several maginitudes
>> > greater than the Nixon cover-up.
> That is beyond stupid.
>
> The next morning after the attack, Obama called it a terror attack.
>
> This "evidence" is basically

While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
very bad...


http://www.examiner.com/article/lebanese-report-us-ambassador-raped-before-murdered

The Lebanese news organization Tayyar.org is reporting that the murdered
American ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, was raped prior to
his killing September 11, 2012.

Tayyar.com also reported via Google translation from the original
Arabic, Ambassador Stevens:

�
"...was killed and representation of his body in a manner similar to
what happened with Gaddafi, such as murder."

According to the BBC, when the former Libyan strongman Colonel Moammar
Gaddafi was initially captured:

�
"Still images from an analysis of amateur video footage taken in the
moments after Col Gaddafi's capture appear to show him being sodomised
with a pole or knife."

The Washington Times has posted a video clip (left) reportedly
originating from the Libyan Free Press confirming the sodomization of
Ambassador Stevens prior to his murder.

As translated by The Washington Times, the Libyan reporter stated:

�
"Libya - USA Ambassador in Bengazi sodomized and killed by his own
al-Qaeda puppets."


http://video.foxnews.com/v/1922193626001/was-there-a-live-feed-of-the-terrorist-attack-in-benghazi-/

Was there a live feed of the terrorist attack in Benghazi?

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/uk-usa-benghazi-emails-idUKBRE89N02E20121024

Emails: White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack

(Reuters) - Officials at the White House and State Department were
advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission
in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had
claimed credit for the attack, official emails show.

The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected
with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested
anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar
al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even
as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were
killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other
U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a "terrorist" attack carried
out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or
sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney,
citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for
days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an
anti-Muslim film.

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 3:15 PM, Milt wrote:
> So, we should trust everything al Qaeda says now?

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 2:01 PM, Matt wrote:
> MattB<trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:ibig881cl06a3hsqd...@4ax.com:
>
>> White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept. 11
>>
>> Read more:
>> http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2012/Oct-24/192544-emails-
>> white-house-told-of-militant-claim-two-hours-after-libya-attack.ashx
>>
>>
>> Two hours after the U.S. Consulate came under attack in Benghazi,
>> Libya, the White House was told that a militant group was claiming
>> responsibility for the violence that killed the U.S. ambassador and
>> three other Americans.
>>
>
> Claiming responsibility.
>
> Any idea how many people come forward "claiming responsibility" for crimes
> each and every day?
>

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 1:59 PM, Phlip wrote:
>> White House Responds to Release of Real-Time Emails About Benghazi
>> Attack
>
> So... Bush owns the Intel "failures"

[Hell Stomper]

On Oct 24, 4:01 pm, Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote innews:ibig881cl06a3hsqd...@4ax.com:

Why do you guys constantly attempt the impossible?
There is no way in hell that you can defend the White House on this
one.

[Phlip]

> Why do you guys constantly attempt the impossible?
> There is no way in hell that you can defend the White House on this
> one.

Maybe Obama thinks Benghazi has WMDs...

[Steve]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:22:18 -0700 (PDT), Milt <milt....@gmail.com>
wrote:

He did no such thing. Making a general reference to "acts of terror"
is not the same as referring to the attacks in Libya as terrorism.

>This "evidence" is basically al Qaeda claiming responsibility. You
>call that credible, do ya? Are you saying you believe everything al
>Qaeda tells us now? Or might it make sense to, I dunno... do an
>investigation, perhaps?
>
>
>> Biden denied the any knowledge of a
>> request for more diplomatic security forces in Libya. Biden's comment
>> "we weren't told". Yet the administration knew this was a terrorist
>> attack within two hours of the attack. They were aware of this attack
>> going on for seven hours yet, did nothing to provide support for the
>> four Americans who were murdered. Help was only an hour away. Obama went
>> to the Rose Garden in the AM next day, spoke and then went on a fund
>> raising campaign. At least with the Nixon cover-up he didn't have blood
>> on his hands.
>>
>That's not true, actually.
>
>Frankly, I think Republicans should be ashamed of themselves for
>exploiting this for political advantage. I've never seen anything so
>disgusting in my life. And yes, I would have felt the same way of
>Democrats had spent the weeks after the original 9/11 had gone after
>Bush the same way.

<LOL> No you wouldn't...

[3206 Dead]

As Matt said, various groups claimed responsibility for virtually every
terror attack made against the US--including 9/11.

[3206 Dead]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:27:58 -0600, Mark Hill wrote:

> On 10/24/2012 1:59 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>> White House Responds to Release of Real-Time Emails About Benghazi
>>> Attack
>>
>> So... Bush owns the Intel "failures"
>
>
>
> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
> very bad...

You're a piece of shit liar, bubbles, and you proved it right out of the
gate.

The embassy in Tripoli had put in a request for more protection a couple
of days earlier. Congress had cut the diplomatic embassy security by
$300 million and some of the hotspot regions were feeling exposed. The
consulate at Bengazi put in no such request. It wasn't considered a
danger spot.

It did ask for help during the attacks, (and were clearly under the
impression that the attacks stemmed from that video), but the requests
were directed to the embassy in Libya, not the White House.
>
Snip really sleazy Moonie Times article except this amazing line:

> "Libya - USA Ambassador in Bengazi sodomized and killed by his own
> al-Qaeda puppets."
>

So tell us, bubbles: are you whining that the White House didn't hire
enough al Qaida people?

[3206 Dead]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:27:58 -0600, Mark Hill wrote:

> On 10/24/2012 1:59 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>> White House Responds to Release of Real-Time Emails About Benghazi
>>> Attack
>>
>> So... Bush owns the Intel "failures"
>
>
>
> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
> very bad...

You're a piece of shit liar, bubbles, and you proved it right out of the
gate.

The embassy in Tripoli had put in a request for more protection a couple
of days earlier. Congress had cut the diplomatic embassy security by
$300 million and some of the hotspot regions were feeling exposed. The
consulate at Bengazi put in no such request. It wasn't considered a
danger spot.

It did ask for help during the attacks, (and were clearly under the
impression that the attacks stemmed from that video), but the requests
were directed to the embassy in Libya, not the White House.
>
Snip really sleazy Moonie Times article except this amazing line:

> "Libya - USA Ambassador in Bengazi sodomized and killed by his own
> al-Qaeda puppets."
>

[3206 Dead]

Oh, look. It's another stupid right wing asshole who thinks he can turn
lies into truth by spamming the groups with a macro.

> “

> "...was killed and representation of his body in a manner similar to
> what happened with Gaddafi, such as murder."
>
> According to the BBC, when the former Libyan strongman Colonel Moammar
> Gaddafi was initially captured:
>

> “

> "Still images from an analysis of amateur video footage taken in the
> moments after Col Gaddafi's capture appear to show him being sodomised
> with a pole or knife."
>
> The Washington Times has posted a video clip (left) reportedly
> originating from the Libyan Free Press confirming the sodomization of
> Ambassador Stevens prior to his murder.
>
> As translated by The Washington Times, the Libyan reporter stated:
>

> “

[R.Dean]

No, there were desperate emails from the Americans at the American
Embassy. Furthermore this attack went on for seven hours while the
President did nothing about it. He fiddled while the Embassy burned
and Four Americans died.

[3206 Dead]

Yes, yes, and payroll taxes are not taxes.

Shall we discuss what the meaning of "is" is?

[Phlip]

> No, there were desperate emails from the Americans at the American
> Embassy. Furthermore this attack went on for seven hours while the
> President did nothing about it. He fiddled while the Embassy burned
> and Four Americans died.

But Congress slashing funding for embassies had NOTHING to do with it!

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 4:25 PM, 3206 Dead wrote:
> You're a piece of shit liar, bubbles, and you proved it right out of the
> gate.




While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
very bad...

http://www.examiner.com/article/lebanese-report-us-ambassador-raped-before-murdered

The Lebanese news organization Tayyar.org is reporting that the murdered
American ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, was raped prior to
his killing September 11, 2012.

Tayyar.com also reported via Google translation from the original
Arabic, Ambassador Stevens:

“

"...was killed and representation of his body in a manner similar to
what happened with Gaddafi, such as murder."

According to the BBC, when the former Libyan strongman Colonel Moammar
Gaddafi was initially captured:

“

"Still images from an analysis of amateur video footage taken in the
moments after Col Gaddafi's capture appear to show him being sodomised
with a pole or knife."

The Washington Times has posted a video clip (left) reportedly
originating from the Libyan Free Press confirming the sodomization of
Ambassador Stevens prior to his murder.

As translated by The Washington Times, the Libyan reporter stated:

“

"Libya - USA Ambassador in Bengazi sodomized and killed by his own
al-Qaeda puppets."

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 4:25 PM, 3206 Dead wrote:

> You're a piece of shit liar, bubbles, and you proved it right out of the
> gate.




While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
very bad...

http://www.examiner.com/article/lebanese-report-us-ambassador-raped-before-murdered

The Lebanese news organization Tayyar.org is reporting that the murdered
American ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, was raped prior to
his killing September 11, 2012.

Tayyar.com also reported via Google translation from the original
Arabic, Ambassador Stevens:

“

"...was killed and representation of his body in a manner similar to
what happened with Gaddafi, such as murder."

According to the BBC, when the former Libyan strongman Colonel Moammar
Gaddafi was initially captured:

“

"Still images from an analysis of amateur video footage taken in the
moments after Col Gaddafi's capture appear to show him being sodomised
with a pole or knife."

The Washington Times has posted a video clip (left) reportedly
originating from the Libyan Free Press confirming the sodomization of
Ambassador Stevens prior to his murder.

As translated by The Washington Times, the Libyan reporter stated:

“

"Libya - USA Ambassador in Bengazi sodomized and killed by his own
al-Qaeda puppets."

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 4:31 PM, 3206 Dead wrote:
> Oh, look. It's another stupid right wing asshole who thinks

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 4:52 PM, 3206 Dead wrote:
> Shall we discuss what the meaning of "is" is?

[MattB]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

What has this to do with the topic under discussion? Is this just a
distraction again? Seems Obama needs many of them lately.

[MattB]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:56:01 -0700 (PDT), Phlip <phli...@gmail.com>
wrote:

What another distraction?

Obama blew it. He failed yet again.

[Steve]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

Not when it's for the purpose of buying insurance coverage

"Electricity in California was a publically-held utility (i.e.,
government-run) from 1895 until 1998. It took privatization
of the generation plants to fuck everything up
beyond belief."
David (Zepp) Jamieson
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.republicans/msg/3ad9a56512ac8e2e?hl=en

[Steve]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:25:28 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:27:58 -0600, Mark Hill wrote:
>
>> On 10/24/2012 1:59 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>>> White House Responds to Release of Real-Time Emails About Benghazi
>>>> Attack
>>>
>>> So... Bush owns the Intel "failures"
>>
>>
>>
>> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
>> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>> very bad...
>
>You're a piece of shit liar, bubbles, and you proved it right out of the
>gate.

Obama went to bed knowing that the embassy was under attack.

[3206 Dead]

You really think your silly parsing games are important?

An act of terror is not terrorism? Really?

Or is it terrorism only when a Republican stooge says it is?

[3206 Dead]

The Republicans cut funding for embassy security by $300 million last
year.

Maybe they were HOPING something like this would happen. A few dead
Ambassadors should embarrass the Democratic President, right?

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 03:31:55 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

A excuse another one. Can anyone say backpeddling liberals. LOL

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 03:30:45 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

LOL You better try harder. Even the libyan government said it was a
terrorist act while Obobo was still blaming it on a video.

You aren't dancing very well.

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 03:31:55 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:10:36 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:56:01 -0700 (PDT), Phlip <phli...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> No, there were desperate emails from the Americans at the American
>>>> Embassy. Furthermore this attack went on for seven hours while the
>>>> President did nothing about it. He fiddled while the Embassy burned
>>>> and Four Americans died.
>>>
>>>But Congress slashing funding for embassies had NOTHING to do with it!
>>
>>
>> What another distraction?
>>
>> Obama blew it. He failed yet again.
>
>The Republicans cut funding for embassy security by $300 million last
>year.

...and Obama failed to provide adequate security in Libya. He has
the blood of four Americans on his hands..
--
Ignorance and irony from Zepp:

"farms were never subject to inheritance taxes. What sort of
moron are you? "
David (Zepp) Jamieson
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.california/msg/5c59cc2755acd39c?hl=en

[Eddie Haskell]

"Phlip" <phli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7b60d05d-049f-4a4e...@v19g2000pbt.googlegroups.com...

When you finish with your DNC talking point excuse lie, you might think
about giving a fuck.

Pile of shit.

-Eddie Haskell

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 9:31 PM, 3206 Dead wrote:
> The Republicans cut funding for embassy

While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
very bad...

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 9:30 PM, 3206 Dead wrote:
> An act of terror is not terrorism? Really?

[Mark Hill]

On 10/24/2012 4:56 PM, Phlip wrote:
> But Congress slashing funding for embassies

While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
very bad...


http://www.examiner.com/article/lebanese-report-us-ambassador-raped-before-murdered

The Lebanese news organization Tayyar.org is reporting that the murdered
American ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, was raped prior to
his killing September 11, 2012.

Tayyar.com also reported via Google translation from the original
Arabic, Ambassador Stevens:

�

"...was killed and representation of his body in a manner similar to
what happened with Gaddafi, such as murder."

According to the BBC, when the former Libyan strongman Colonel Moammar
Gaddafi was initially captured:

�

"Still images from an analysis of amateur video footage taken in the
moments after Col Gaddafi's capture appear to show him being sodomised
with a pole or knife."

The Washington Times has posted a video clip (left) reportedly
originating from the Libyan Free Press confirming the sodomization of
Ambassador Stevens prior to his murder.

As translated by The Washington Times, the Libyan reporter stated:

�

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:k6abra$4e1$4...@dont-email.me...

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:10:36 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:56:01 -0700 (PDT), Phlip <phli...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> No, there were desperate emails from the Americans at the American
>>>> Embassy. Furthermore this attack went on for seven hours while the
>>>> President did nothing about it. He fiddled while the Embassy burned
>>>> and Four Americans died.
>>>
>>>But Congress slashing funding for embassies had NOTHING to do with it!
>>
>>
>> What another distraction?
>>
>> Obama blew it. He failed yet again.
>
> The Republicans cut funding for embassy security by $300 million last
> year.

Goddamn lie.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message

news:k6abp5$4e1$3...@dont-email.me...

Don't talk with your mouth full of Hussein's cock.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message

news:k69pso$350$3...@dont-email.me...

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:27:58 -0600, Mark Hill wrote:
>
>> On 10/24/2012 1:59 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>>> White House Responds to Release of Real-Time Emails About Benghazi
>>>> Attack
>>>
>>> So... Bush owns the Intel "failures"
>>
>>
>>
>> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
>> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>> very bad...
>
> You're a piece of shit liar, bubbles, and you proved it right out of the
> gate.
>
> The embassy in Tripoli had put in a request for more protection a couple
> of days earlier. Congress had cut the diplomatic embassy security by
> $300 million

Yeah, that's it. Suck that big Hussein cock, boy. Work it over good. Slurp
slurp slurp.

http://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/330289/bidens-lie-about-embassy-security-and-romneys-statement-benghazi-greg-pollowitz#

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/12/politics/fact-check-benghazi-security/index.html

http://wizbangblog.com/2012/10/11/obamas-new-lie-no-funding-for-embassy-security-was-the-problem/

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message

news:k69ptm$bi8$1...@dont-email.me...

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:27:58 -0600, Mark Hill wrote:
>
>> On 10/24/2012 1:59 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>>> White House Responds to Release of Real-Time Emails About Benghazi
>>>> Attack
>>>
>>> So... Bush owns the Intel "failures"
>>
>>
>>
>> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
>> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>> very bad...
>
> You're a piece of shit liar, bubbles, and you proved it right out of the
> gate.
>
> The embassy in Tripoli had put in a request for more protection a couple
> of days earlier. Congress had cut the diplomatic embassy security by
> $300 million

Suck that big Hussein cock. Go boy. Go. Slurp Slurp. Slurp..

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2944177/posts

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message

news:k6abra$4e1$4...@dont-email.me...

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:10:36 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:56:01 -0700 (PDT), Phlip <phli...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> No, there were desperate emails from the Americans at the American
>>>> Embassy. Furthermore this attack went on for seven hours while the
>>>> President did nothing about it. He fiddled while the Embassy burned
>>>> and Four Americans died.
>>>
>>>But Congress slashing funding for embassies had NOTHING to do with it!
>>
>>
>> What another distraction?
>>
>> Obama blew it. He failed yet again.
>
> The Republicans cut funding for embassy security by $300 million last
> year.

Last year was 2014?

Look at him go! Suckin' that big Hussein cock for all it's worth. Woo hoo.
Suckin' away. man oh man. Slurp slurp slurp..

[Eddie Haskell]

"Steve" <steven...@yahooooo.com> wrote in message
news:0nsg88ppm5fo28mqv...@4ax.com...

And yuked it up on David Letterman in the aftermath.

Wonder what would have happened to Bush under the same scenario?

Answer:

The press and the democrats would have raped him, cut off his ears, cut off
his head, taped wires from portable telephones to his genitals and turned up
the power, cut off his limbs, blown up his body, randomly shot at him, razed
his ranch in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot his cattle and dogs
for fun, poisoned his food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of
Crawford.

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:52:03 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <k6bnn0$i0j$2...@dont-email.me>, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
>
>> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
>> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>> very bad...
>

>What were they supposed to do?

Well someone here, a liberal says we don't need military just nukes.
So the liberal way would be to nuke them.

Fact is Obama lied and I have a feeling for reasons to do with the
election. He lied for his agenda again as President. Maybe allowing
americans to be murdered is his way of being "Flexible"

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6pfh889lroe92fsrv...@4ax.com...

Can anyone say lying liberals, because the cut Biden was talking about was a
proposal for the 2014 budget.

Hint for fuckwits like 3206 Dead. That's two years from now, so it hasn't
happened yet, and it proposes cutting all nondefense discretionary spending.
Something they would be for, before they were against it.

So now we see that they are full of shit. Their shit is full of shit. And
their shit that's full of shit that's full of shit is full of shit.

3206 Dead: Boy, triple stuffed shit. Mmmm.. My favorite.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2944177/posts

-Eddie Haskell

[3206 Dead]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:47:05 -0700, Where's all the China Blue food?
wrote:

> In article <bbui88lt8j7pv943g...@4ax.com>,

> MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:52:03 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
>> <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <k6bnn0$i0j$2...@dont-email.me>, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our
>> >> Libyan Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting
>> >> bad, very, very bad...
>> >
>> >What were they supposed to do?
>>
>> Well someone here, a liberal says we don't need military just nukes.
>> So the liberal way would be to nuke them.
>

> Do you think an invasion can be mounted from scratch in just a few
> hours?
>
> How do you think that Libya, trying to be a friendly nation, would react
> to an invasion?
>
> Do you know the US responded the FBI rather than the Marine Corps?
>
> Do you know that US embassies and consulates world wide depend on the
> host nations to protect them?

>
>
>> Fact is Obama lied and I have a feeling for reasons to do with the
>

> Try not to be a partisan idiot.

With MattB, Party comes ahead of country.

Always.

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:47:05 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <bbui88lt8j7pv943g...@4ax.com>,
> MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:52:03 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
>> <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <k6bnn0$i0j$2...@dont-email.me>, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
>> >
>> >> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
>> >> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>> >> very bad...
>> >
>> >What were they supposed to do?
>>
>> Well someone here, a liberal says we don't need military just nukes.
>> So the liberal way would be to nuke them.
>

>Do you think an invasion can be mounted from scratch in just a few hours?

Why invade? Wasn't the government of libya that did that attack just
a bunch of extremist nuts.

>
>How do you think that Libya, trying to be a friendly nation, would react to an
>invasion?

Well if we had been told the truth from the beginning. The proper
response should have been to call for local forces to protect the
Embassy. Can't imagine why it took 7+ hours.

>
>Do you know the US responded the FBI rather than the Marine Corps?

Should have been a little of both.

>
>Do you know that US embassies and consulates world wide depend on the host
>nations to protect them?

Yes and this showed that all Embassies in Muslims countries should
have there security increased and all have safe rooms.

>
>
>> Fact is Obama lied and I have a feeling for reasons to do with the
>

>Try not to be a partisan idiot.

Yes I could say the same.


Obama failed and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton should be canned
ASAP. Then again Obama can't.

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:52:52 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

LOL Country and truth go together except for you liberals.

Obama lied for how long?

Obama knew the truth for how long.

Obama did not increase security WHY?

Obama did not fire Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, WHY?

The Libyan government was telling us the truth before Obama. Fact.

Damn in one post I'm a fence sitter at times a liberal and at times
like here a Republican. I don't know if I should be insulted or feel
like it is a complement.



>
>Always.

[Eddie Haskell]

"Where's all the China Blue food?" <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:chine.bleu-E4B41...@news.eternal-september.org...

> In article <bbui88lt8j7pv943g...@4ax.com>,
> MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:52:03 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
>> <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <k6bnn0$i0j$2...@dont-email.me>, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our
>> >> Libyan
>> >> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>> >> very bad...
>> >
>> >What were they supposed to do?
>>
>> Well someone here, a liberal says we don't need military just nukes.
>> So the liberal way would be to nuke them.
>

> Do you think an invasion can be mounted from scratch in just a few hours?

The assault lasted for hours and there were tactical forces within reach.

Suckin' on that Hussein dick..

> How do you think that Libya, trying to be a friendly nation, would react
> to an
> invasion?

They wouldn't have given a shit, and who gives a shit if they did give a
shit?

Suckin' that Hussein ding dong..

> Do you know the US responded the FBI rather than the Marine Corps?

Yes, one of the many fuck ups and cover ups.

Suckin' on that big Hussein ding dong..

> Do you know that US embassies and consulates world wide depend on the host
> nations to protect them?

Yeah, and they didn't.

Still suckin' on that big long Hussein ding dong..

>> Fact is Obama lied and I have a feeling for reasons to do with the
>

> Try not to be a partisan idiot.

Try pulling your mouth off Hussein dick and facing the truth, you desperate
embarrassment for a human being.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message

news:k6c1q3$212$5...@dont-email.me...

Translation:

Slurp slurp slurp.

Yeah, suckin' on that big long Hussein ding dong..

Slurp slurp slurp.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:pc3j88l0kkfr0jtah...@4ax.com...

I don't think he heard you. He was too busy slurp slurp slurpin' on that big
long Hussein ding dong.

> Damn in one post I'm a fence sitter at times a liberal and at times
> like here a Republican. I don't know if I should be insulted or feel
> like it is a complement.

Who were about the only people that the story right from the get-go?

Hold on to your ass, cuz this could get rough.

Rush Limbaugh.

Ouch!

Glenn Beck.

Oh, god!

Sean Hannity.

HAA!

Fox News.

Oh mah god!

Bill O'Reilly.

No, please!

Mark Levin

Help!

Eddie Haskell

HAAAAA!!!

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:vu2j88p3lt5aabdlo...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:47:05 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
> <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <bbui88lt8j7pv943g...@4ax.com>,
>> MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:52:03 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
>>> <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <k6bnn0$i0j$2...@dont-email.me>, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our
>>> >> Libyan
>>> >> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>>> >> very bad...
>>> >
>>> >What were they supposed to do?
>>>
>>> Well someone here, a liberal says we don't need military just nukes.
>>> So the liberal way would be to nuke them.
>>
>>Do you think an invasion can be mounted from scratch in just a few hours?
>
> Why invade? Wasn't the government of libya that did that attack just
> a bunch of extremist nuts.

Good god. A full scale invasion over a spontaneous protest to a video.

Hahahahahaha!!!

Slurp slurp slurpin' on that big long Hussein ding dong..

>>How do you think that Libya, trying to be a friendly nation, would react
>>to an
>>invasion?
>
> Well if we had been told the truth from the beginning. The proper
> response should have been to call for local forces to protect the
> Embassy. Can't imagine why it took 7+ hours.

You should see how long she can slurp slurp slurp on that big long Hussein
ding dong..

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

Well not going to check on that. If true just shows miracles can
happen.

Rush I find to be senile. He is losing it, even for him.

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:oo4j88lqq197pqqei...@4ax.com...

In other words you don't know what the hell you are talking about. Knew it
all along. Thanks for the admission.

> If true just shows miracles can
> happen.

Is that what Chris Matthews told you?

> Rush I find to be senile.

That's because you're a moron.

> He is losing it, even for him.

Cite what he's right about but that you are too stupid to understand.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:oo4j88lqq197pqqei...@4ax.com...

How do you know since you don't listen to him?

Don't laugh at him, folks. He's nuts.

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:20:41 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <vu2j88p3lt5aabdlo...@4ax.com>,

> MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> >> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our
>> >> >> Libyan
>> >> >> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>> >> >> very bad...
>> >> >
>> >> >What were they supposed to do?
>> >>
>> >> Well someone here, a liberal says we don't need military just nukes.
>> >> So the liberal way would be to nuke them.
>> >
>> >Do you think an invasion can be mounted from scratch in just a few hours?
>>
>> Why invade? Wasn't the government of libya that did that attack just
>> a bunch of extremist nuts.
>

>So you think Libya is an argument for a large military even though you don't
>know how large military could have helped.


LOL No but you liberals that just say nuke em are a little crazy.

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:44:50 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <2lmj88ltd4bpevcsn...@4ax.com>,

>Nuclear weapons are deterent against invasion. Bush didn't go to Georgia because
>Russia has nuclear weapons. The US stomps on Taiwan because China has nuclear
>weapons. The only reason to continue to have a large military is not defence but
>to interfere in other, weaker countries and thus manufacture enemies for
>politicians to terrify us with.


Well the military could be reorganized. We have a new form of warfare
countries use proxies and we call them terrorist. Iran has it down to
a art. We were invaded on 9/11 should we have nuked the country that
provides the funds or supplies the bases?

Our military isn't set up for these police actions, they aren't
trained for it.

Having nukes as a deterrent will sooner or later be tested. You
willing to turn one of the keys? If the collateral damage in Gaza
makes you scream remember that a 1000 fold worse as you turn the key.

We need a smaller but extremely well trained force. We also never
want a leader like Bush Jr who doesn't realize war is not a game.
There was no need to invade iraq. It made the world a more dangerous
place. We also don't want a wimp like we had in Carter both are
dangerous.

[R. Dean]

On 10/25/2012 12:52 PM, Where's all the China Blue food? wrote:
> In article <k6bnn0$i0j$2...@dont-email.me>, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
>

>> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
>> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>> very bad...
>

> What were they supposed to do?
>

At the very least be honest about it. They knew the attack was NOT
about some video, but a terrorist attack using heavy weapons such as:
ROCKET-PROPELLED GRENADAS, 14.5 MM ANTI-ANTI-AIRCRAFT MACHINE GUNS. GUN
TRUCKS AND MORTARS. .
The Obama Administration Lied and deliberately deceived the people for
almost two weeks. This was a COVER-UP far worse than the NIXON
cover-up. With the Nixon cover-up no one died.

They knew about this but Obama went to the Rose Garden made a speech,
then on a political campaign while four Americans died. Want to know
what they could do? I know what they did not do. They did nothing.

[R. Dean]

On 10/25/2012 2:47 PM, Where's all the China Blue food? wrote:
> In article <bbui88lt8j7pv943g...@4ax.com>,
> MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:52:03 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
>> <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <k6bnn0$i0j$2...@dont-email.me>, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
>>>
>>>> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
>>>> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>>>> very bad...
>>>
>>> What were they supposed to do?
>>
>> Well someone here, a liberal says we don't need military just nukes.
>> So the liberal way would be to nuke them.
>

> Do you think an invasion can be mounted from scratch in just a few hours?
>

> How do you think that Libya, trying to be a friendly nation, would react to an
> invasion?
>
> Do you know the US responded the FBI rather than the Marine Corps?
>
> Do you know that US embassies and consulates world wide depend on the host
> nations to protect them?
>
>

>> Fact is Obama lied and I have a feeling for reasons to do with the
>

> Try not to be a partisan idiot.
>

The fact is Obama and his administration lied and engaged in a cover-up
with the help of the national media. I'm an independent, who usually
votes democrat or split-ticket, but not this time.

[R. Dean]

Bill Clinton has begged his wife to defend herself and release
her documents on the Benghazi attack. However, she refuses saying
she doesn't want to be a traitor to the democratic party.
>
> Always.
>

[R. Dean]

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:58:17 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <8vsj885gt78ojoo3u...@4ax.com>,

> MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We need a smaller but extremely well trained force. We also never
>

>Like I said, nuclear deterrent for military invasions and police or police like
>forces for the rest.


Tell me would you be willing to use nukes on any country that attacked
America. Say like another 9/11?

[MattB]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:55:19 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <f1bk889gpi6ecnjkr...@4ax.com>,

>Lordy you're aggressively stupid.

Well it is a fair question.

[Milt]

On Oct 24, 3:25 pm, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 3:22 PM, Milt wrote:
>
> >> This was a cover-up by the Obama administration of several maginitudes
> >> >  greater than the Nixon cover-up.
> > That is beyond stupid.
>
> > The next morning after the attack, Obama called it a terror attack.
>
> > This "evidence" is basically

>
> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
> very bad...
>

> http://www.examiner.com/article/lebanese-report-us-ambassador-raped-b...

The Examiner?
>
> The Lebanese news organization Tayyar.org is reporting that the murdered
> American ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, was raped prior to
> his killing September 11, 2012.
>
> Tayyar.com also reported via Google translation from the original
> Arabic, Ambassador Stevens:
>
> “
> "...was killed and representation of his body in a manner similar to
> what happened with Gaddafi, such as murder."

Oh, well, a Lebanese newspaper with a Google translation. How could
that be wrong?
>
> According to the BBC, when the former Libyan strongman Colonel Moammar
> Gaddafi was initially captured:
>
> “
> "Still images from an analysis of amateur video footage taken in the
> moments after Col Gaddafi's capture appear to show him being sodomised
> with a pole or knife."
>
> The Washington Times has posted a video clip (left) reportedly
> originating from the Libyan Free Press confirming the sodomization of
> Ambassador Stevens prior to his murder.
>
> As translated by The Washington Times, the Libyan reporter stated:

The Washington Times, which stopped pretending to be a legit newspaper
several years back?
>
> “
> "Libya - USA Ambassador in Bengazi sodomized and killed by his own
> al-Qaeda puppets."
>
> http://video.foxnews.com/v/1922193626001/was-there-a-live-feed-of-the...
>
> Was there a live feed of the terrorist attack in Benghazi?
>
> http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/uk-usa-benghazi-emails-idUKB...
>
> Emails: White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack
>
> (Reuters) - Officials at the White House and State Department were
> advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission
> in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had
> claimed credit for the attack, official emails show.
>
> The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected
> with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested
> anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar
> al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.
>
> The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even
> as it was still under way, to Washington.
>
> U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were
> killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other
> U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a "terrorist" attack carried
> out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or
> sympathizers.
>
> Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney,
> citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for
> days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an
> anti-Muslim film.


The point is, NO ONE knew exactly what happened two hours after the
attack, and frankly, no one knows what happened even now, six weeks
later.

And that Republican fucktards are trying so hard to turn this into a
political event is disgusting. If Democrats had done that in 2001,
after the original 9/11, I would have said the same thing.

[Phlip]

> White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept. 11

The spin is over, and you guys lost.

Romney has dropped the "Libya" talking points from his stump speech.

Good luck covering up the links between the Benghazi raid and our
wingnuts who put a stupid video on YouTube at just the right time.

And that video is _still_ in the Reuters stories about the attack.

[Milt]

On Oct 24, 4:03 pm, Steve <stevencan...@yahooooo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:22:18 -0700 (PDT), Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Oct 24, 2:28 pm, "R.Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> On 10/24/2012 4:06 PM, MattB wrote:
>
> >> > White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept. 11
>

> >> > Read more:
> >> >http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2012/Oct-24/192544-email...
>
> >> > Two hours after the U.S. Consulate came under attack in Benghazi,
> >> > Libya, the White House was told that a militant group was claiming
> >> > responsibility for the violence that killed the U.S. ambassador and
> >> > three other Americans.
>
> >> > A State Department email sent to intelligence officials and the White
> >> > House situation room said the Islamist group Ansar al-Sharia claimed
> >> > responsibility on Facebook and Twitter, and also called for an attack
> >> > on the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli.
>
> >> > The document may fuel Republican efforts to show that the White House
> >> > knew it was a terrorist attack, even as the U.S. ambassador to the
> >> > United Nations was saying - five days afterward - that it appeared to
> >> > be a protest gone awry.
>
> >> > The Obama administration's account of the Benghazi events has become a
> >> > campaign issue, with Republican challenger Mitt Romney and Republican
> >> > lawmakers accusing the White House of misleading Americans about the
> >> > nature of the attack.
>
> >> > The Associated Press and other news organizations obtained the
> >> > unclassified email and two related emails from government officials
> >> > who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak
> >> > about them publicly.
>
> >> > Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Wednesday that the
> >> > review board she appointed to investigate the attack is "looking at
> >> > everything," rather than "cherry picking one story here or one
> >> > document there."
>
> >> > White House press secretary Jay Carney said the emails represented
> >> > just one piece of information the administration was receiving at the
> >> > time.

>
> >> This was a cover-up by the Obama administration of several maginitudes
> >> greater than the Nixon cover-up.
>
> >That is beyond stupid.
>
> >The next morning after the attack, Obama called it a terror attack.
>

> He did no such thing.  Making a general reference to "acts of terror"
> is not the same as referring to the attacks in Libya as terrorism.
>
He was talking about these specific attacks. He's not Rudy Giuliani
whose every sentence consists of "noun, verb, 9/11/"

But hey, I'll give you a shot. Why don't you explain what else he
could "generally" be talking about when he's holding a press
conference on this specific instance and mentions "act of terror."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >This "evidence" is basically al Qaeda claiming responsibility. You
> >call that credible, do ya? Are you saying you believe everything al
> >Qaeda tells us now? Or might it make sense to, I dunno... do an
> >investigation, perhaps?
>
> >> Biden denied the any knowledge of a
> >> request for more diplomatic security forces in Libya. Biden's comment
> >> "we weren't told". Yet the administration knew this was a terrorist
> >> attack within two hours of the attack. They were aware of this attack
> >> going on for seven hours yet, did nothing to provide support for the
> >> four Americans who were murdered. Help was only an hour away. Obama went
> >> to the Rose Garden in the AM next day, spoke and then went on a fund
> >> raising campaign. At least with the Nixon cover-up he didn't have blood
> >> on his hands.
>
> >That's not true, actually.
>
> >Frankly, I think Republicans should be ashamed of themselves for
> >exploiting this for political advantage. I've never seen anything so
> >disgusting in my life. And yes, I would have felt the same way of
> >Democrats had spent the weeks after the original 9/11 had gone after
> >Bush the same way.
>
> <LOL>  No you wouldn't...

Yeah, I would have. And actually did, in a few cases.

[Milt]

On Oct 24, 4:59 pm, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 4:52 PM, 3206 Dead wrote:
>
> > Shall we discuss what the meaning of "is" is?

>
> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
> very bad...
>
> http://www.examiner.com/article/lebanese-report-us-ambassador-raped-b...
>

Repeating bullshit doesn't make it more true.

You DO know the Examiner isn't actually a newspaper anymore, right?
Anyone, even you, can set up their own "Examiner."

Use legit news sources, or shut up.

[Steve]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 06:50:40 -0700 (PDT), Milt <milt....@gmail.com>
wrote:

No he wasn't... he never once referred to the Libyan attack as a
terrorist attack.. he sent his Press Secretary out to pass on the
dishonest story about the video... even though he'd already been
told that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack.

[Man of Mind]

On 10/26/2012 9:55 AM, "steve" was experiencing confusion when:
>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 06:50:40 -0700 (PDT), Milt pointed out for:
>>
>> On Oct 24, 4:03 pm, "steve" whined obsessively when:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:22:18 -0700 (PDT), Milt stated:
....

>>>> The next morning after the attack, Obama called it a terror attack.
>>>
>>> He did no such thing. Making a general reference to "acts of terror"
>>> is not the same as referring to the attacks in Libya as terrorism.
>>>
>> He was talking about these specific attacks.
>
> No he wasn't... he never once referred to the Libyan attack as a
> terrorist attack..

Too bad that Condi Rice disputes what you're trying to insinuate..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2k_LMTNLZXc

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/25/1089691/condi-rice-pours-cold-water-libya/?mobile=nc

"Former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice broke with the
majority of her party last night on Fox News, as she tried
to hit the brakes on the right wing’s politicization of
the recent attack in Libya.

Host Greta Van Susteren asked Rice directly and repeatedly
about a set of emails uncovered by Reuters. In what has been
dubbed “Benghazi-Gate,” the conservative media has jumped on
the emails as definitive proof that the Obama administration
has been lying about what it knew and when in the aftermath
of the Sept. 11 attack on a diplomatic mission in Benghazi.
Rice’s response was likely not what Van Susteren expected."

--But keep on whining like frustrated fascist thug, "stephie"..

[Man of Mind]

On 10/26/2012 8:49 AM, Phlip wrote:
>>
>> White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept. 11
>
> The spin is over, and you guys lost.
>
> Romney has dropped the "Libya" talking points from his stump speech.
>
> Good luck covering up the links between the Benghazi raid and our
> wingnuts who put a stupid video on YouTube at just the right time.

Yup, quite the coincidence that..

--And you know what they say about politics and coincidences..

[3206 Dead]

No one knew, but that sure as shit didn't stop Mittens from throwing that
disgraceful press conference, claiming Obama was apologizing to
terrorists, and all but jumping up and down with glee.

The man is an sociopathic dirt bag. He makes Obama look good.

[Milt]

On Oct 26, 8:55 am, Steve <stevencan...@yahooooo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 06:50:40 -0700 (PDT), Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com>

Fuckwit. Here's a transcript of the Rose Garden Speech, September 12,
2012:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2012/09/12/president-obama-speaks-attack-benghazi

Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an
attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi. Among those killed was our
Ambassador, Chris Stevens, as well as Foreign Service Officer Sean
Smith. We are still notifying the families of the others who were
killed. And today, the American people stand united in holding the
families of the four Americans in our thoughts and in our prayers.

The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and
shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure
our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our
security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we
will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers
who attacked our people.

Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects
all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs
of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of
senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to
unequivocally reject these brutal acts.

(...)

No ***acts of terror*** will ever shake the resolve of this great
nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that
we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the
very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our
commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make
no mistake, justice will be done.

But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark
contrast to those of their ***attackers.*** These four Americans stood
up for freedom and human dignity. They should give every American
great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our
flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in
freedom and with dignity.

We grieve with their families, but let us carry on their memory, and
let us continue their work of seeking a stronger America and a better
world for all of our children.

------------------------

There's also a video. I know you have a problem reading.

[Milt]

On Oct 24, 3:26 pm, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 3:15 PM, Milt wrote:
>
> > So, we should trust everything al Qaeda says now?

>
> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
> very bad...
>

> http://www.examiner.com/article/lebanese-report-us-ambassador-raped-b...
>
Repeating bullshit doesn't make it true.

[Eddie Haskell]

"Where's all the China Blue food?" <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:chine.bleu-E4B41...@news.eternal-september.org...
> In article <bbui88lt8j7pv943g...@4ax.com>,
> MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:52:03 -0700, "Where's all the China Blue food?"
>> <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <k6bnn0$i0j$2...@dont-email.me>, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not>
>> >wrote:
>> >

>> >> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our
>> >> Libyan
>> >> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
>> >> very bad...
>> >

>> >What were they supposed to do?
>>

>> Well someone here, a liberal says we don't need military just nukes.
>> So the liberal way would be to nuke them.
>
> Do you think an invasion can be mounted from scratch in just a few hours?
>
> How do you think that Libya, trying to be a friendly nation, would react
> to an
> invasion?
>
> Do you know the US responded the FBI rather than the Marine Corps?
>
> Do you know that US embassies and consulates world wide depend on the host
> nations to protect them?
>
>
>> Fact is Obama lied and I have a feeling for reasons to do with the
>
> Try not to be a partisan idiot.

Try not to project exactly what you know you are guilty and start giving
more of a fuck about your country as opposed to shamelessly shilling for
Hussein and the democrats.

Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an
urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on
the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later was denied by
U.S. officials -- who also told the CIA operators twice to "stand down"
rather than help the ambassador's team when shots were heard at
approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.
Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA
annex about a mile from the U.S. consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens
and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired,
they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were
hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They
were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange.
Soon after, they were again told to "stand down."

Woods and at least two others ignored those orders and made their way to the
consulate which at that point was on fire. Shots were exchanged. The rescue
team from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the consulate and
Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find
the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight.

At that point, they called again for military support and help because they
were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied.
There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present
at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their
headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of
the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA
compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and
repeatedly requested back-up support from a Spectre gunship, which is
commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to
Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The
fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours -- enough time
for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive.
Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations
forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.

A Special Operations team, or CIF which stands for Commanders in Extremis
Force, operating in Central Europe had been moved to Sigonella, Italy, but
they were never told to deploy. In fact, a Pentagon official says there were
never any requests to deploy assets from outside the country. A second force
that specializes in counterterrorism rescues was on hand at Sigonella,
according to senior military and intelligence sources. According to those
sources, they could have flown to Benghazi in less than two hours. They were
the same distance to Benghazi as those that were sent from Tripoli. Spectre
gunships are commonly used by the Special Operations community to provide
close air support.

According to sources on the ground during the attack, the special operator
on the roof of the CIA annex had visual contact and a laser pointing at the
Libyan mortar team that was targeting the CIA annex. The operators were
calling in coordinates of where the Libyan forces were firing from.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters at the Pentagon on Thursday
that there was not a clear enough picture of what was occurring on the
ground in Benghazi to send help.

"There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here," Panetta said
Thursday. "But the basic principle here ... is that you don't deploy forces
into harm's way without knowing what's going on."

U.S. officials argue that there was a period of several hours when the
fighting stopped before the mortars were fired at the annex, leading
officials to believe the attack was over.

Fox News has learned that there were two military surveillance drones
redirected to Benghazi shortly after the attack on the consulate began. They
were already in the vicinity. The second surveillance craft was sent to
relieve the first drone, perhaps due to fuel issues. Both were capable of
sending real time visuals back to U.S. officials in Washington, D.C. Any
U.S. official or agency with the proper clearance, including the White House
Situation Room, State Department, CIA, Pentagon and others, could call up
that video in real time on their computers.

Tyrone Woods was later joined at the scene by fellow former Navy SEAL Glen
Doherty, who was sent in from Tripoli as part of a Global Response Staff or
GRS that provides security to CIA case officers and provides
countersurveillance and surveillance protection. They were killed by a
mortar shell at 4 a.m. Libyan time, nearly seven hours after the attack on
the consulate began -- a window that represented more than enough time for
the U.S. military to send back-up from nearby bases in Europe, according to
sources familiar with Special Operations. Four mortars were fired at the
annex. The first one struck outside the annex. Three more hit the annex.

A motorcade of dozens of Libyan vehicles, some mounted with 50 caliber
machine guns, belonging to the February 17th Brigades, a Libyan militia
which is friendly to the U.S., finally showed up at the CIA annex at
approximately 3 a.m. An American Quick Reaction Force sent from Tripoli had
arrived at the Benghazi airport at 2 a.m. (four hours after the initial
attack on the consulate) and was delayed for 45 minutes at the airport
because they could not at first get transportation, allegedly due to
confusion among Libyan militias who were supposed to escort them to the
annex, according to Benghazi sources.

The American special operators, Woods, Doherty and at least two others were
part of the Global Response Staff, a CIA element, based at the CIA annex and
were protecting CIA operators who were part of a mission to track and
repurchase arms in Benghazi that had proliferated in the wake of Muammar
Qaddafi's fall. Part of their mission was to find the more than 20,000
missing MANPADS, or shoulder-held missiles capable of bringing down a
commercial aircraft. According to a source on the ground at the time of the
attack, the team inside the CIA annex had captured three Libyan attackers
and was forced to hand them over to the Libyans. U.S. officials do not know
what happened to those three attackers and whether they were released by the
Libyan forces.

Fox News has also learned that Stevens was in Benghazi that day to be
present at the opening of an English-language school being started by the
Libyan farmer who helped save an American pilot who had been shot down by
pro-Qaddafi forces during the initial war to overthrow the regime. That
farmer saved the life of the American pilot and the ambassador wanted to be
present to launch the Libyan rescuer's new school.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/cia-operators-were-denied-request-for-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources-say/

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:39:45 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:15:27 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:

>
>>>> Tell me would you be willing to use nukes on any country that attacked
>>>> America. Say like another 9/11?
>>>
>>>Lordy you're aggressively stupid.
>>
>>Well it is a fair question.
>

>Asked of you---it's idiotic


My Stalker Malignita Nero Yoorghis AKA Gary Roselles Pedo-loon of
Rapid City, SD.

Hoover Vacuums sure do suck.

[Eddie Haskell]

"Milt" <milt....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:32e00183-8dad-4654...@c16g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...

On Oct 24, 3:25 pm, Mark Hill <mh...@qmail.not> wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 3:22 PM, Milt wrote:
>
> >> This was a cover-up by the Obama administration of several maginitudes
> >> > greater than the Nixon cover-up.
> > That is beyond stupid.
>
> > The next morning after the attack, Obama called it a terror attack.
>
> > This "evidence" is basically
>
> While the Obama White House *ignored the frantic emails* from our Libyan
> Embassy WHILE THEY WERE UNDER ATTACK, things were getting bad, very,
> very bad...
>
> http://www.examiner.com/article/lebanese-report-us-ambassador-raped-b...

> The Examiner?

Yeah, one of the sources that had the Libyan story right while the rest of
the MSM was dutifully regurgitating the WH lie. So as an obvious democrat
you turn to smears to protect your corrupt masters.

> The Lebanese news organization Tayyar.org is reporting that the murdered
> American ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, was raped prior to
> his killing September 11, 2012.
>
> Tayyar.com also reported via Google translation from the original
> Arabic, Ambassador Stevens:
>
> “
> "...was killed and representation of his body in a manner similar to
> what happened with Gaddafi, such as murder."

> Oh, well, a Lebanese newspaper with a Google translation. How could
> that be wrong?

It's impolite to talk with you mouth full of Hussein cock like that.

> According to the BBC, when the former Libyan strongman Colonel Moammar
> Gaddafi was initially captured:
>
> “
> "Still images from an analysis of amateur video footage taken in the
> moments after Col Gaddafi's capture appear to show him being sodomised
> with a pole or knife."
>
> The Washington Times has posted a video clip (left) reportedly
> originating from the Libyan Free Press confirming the sodomization of
> Ambassador Stevens prior to his murder.
>
> As translated by The Washington Times, the Libyan reporter stated:

> The Washington Times, which stopped pretending to be a legit newspaper
> several years back?

Yeah, one of the sources that had the Libyan story right while the rest of
the MSM was dutifully regurgitating the WH lie. So as an obvious democrat
you turn to smears to protect your corrupt masters.

> The point is, NO ONE knew exactly what happened two hours after the
> attack, and frankly, no one knows what happened even now, six weeks
> later.

You are liar and a pathetic shill.

> And that Republican fucktards are trying so hard to turn this into a
> political event is disgusting. If Democrats had done that in 2001,
> after the original 9/11, I would have said the same thing.

If a republican were president this would be a bigger scandal than Watergate
and Iran contra combined, and should be. But thanks to a corrupt MSM..

[Steve]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT), Milt <milt....@gmail.com>
wrote:

Like I said before, he never once referred to the Libyan attack as a

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:k6e9pk$24m$4...@dont-email.me...

Romney said that it was disgraceful to be apologizing for our free speech
and he was dead on the money so the MSM cabal got together to tell your
stupid fucking ass what to think while they covered for Hussein's bald faced
lying for two weeks.

The whole fuckin' thing had you jacking off with glee.

Oh, and then Hillary told the father of one of the victims that they would
make sure they got that film maker and then had him arrested with the full
spectacle of posting it all on you tube.

Welcome to the united fascist states of America.

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 09:18:15 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:38:58 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>

>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:39:45 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:15:27 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Tell me would you be willing to use nukes on any country that attacked
>>>>>> America. Say like another 9/11?
>>>>>
>>>>>Lordy you're aggressively stupid.
>>>>
>>>>Well it is a fair question.
>>>
>>>Asked of you---it's idiotic
>>
>>
>>My Stalker
>

>Is making sure that nothing of your bullshit gets accepted as
>credible.

You aren't credible. Ped freak.

Your cut and paste with new subject line trick is well known and
actually makes you look Desperate and proves you are a liar.

You are totally racist more so than any KKK or New Black Klan member.
You don't only hate Whites you hate those you call "Uncle Toms"

Stalker Yoorghis AKA Gary Roselles Pedo-loon of Rapid City, SD.

>
>
>
>>===========================================================
>
>
>
>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:07:31 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>
>
>Yep I did and proud of it, did it to there faces and they did it to
>mine. That was/is a thing.
>
>Yes and you still don't understand doubt you care to.
>
>>So---Like Charley Barta---(calling people niggers)---it's all because
>>someone doesn't understand?
>
>I've called a Black man nigger did so for years


LOL Notice you cut out most of what was said. Normal liberal
honesty.

Original

""I've called a Black man nigger did so for years. He called me
Whitey, Honkey and peckerwood. Didn't like peckerwood because the
other Blacks laughed. This was before Internet so took me a while to
learn what it meant. Never got him back for that. Going to have to
work on that for our next meeting.

We were/are all like brothers. A bond beyond your racist
understanding."'

We did this for years and neither was offended. We both knew the
other wasn't racist. He was armed too.

Well thanks for showing everyone how honest a true Obama supporter is.

So let see you cut out most the original and the changed the subject
line so they couldn't see it. Good Work Gary.

Link to original

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/d4e9391b45a6c718?hl=en&dmode=source

===BCC-2

[Man of Mind]

On 10/27/2012 10:17 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT), Milt wrote:
>
>> Fuckwit. Here's a transcript of the Rose Garden Speech, September 12, 2012:
>

> Have Haskell read it for him and then explain it.
>
> Canyonloon's b-b brain exploded a few weeks ago tacking his
> "capacitor" fuckups and the snout-whacking he's been getting.

Yup, crayon 'forgets' that you can't "create" an energy
field out of nothing. That violates the conservation of
energy, as well as Maxwell's Laws..

This is quite similar to his political opinions, complete
nonsense, "created" like those job his imagined wealth is
responsible for, never mind his "magnetic capacitors"..

--He still can't seem to charge them off..

[Milt]

On Oct 26, 1:10 pm, Steve <stevencan...@yahooooo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT), Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com>

> >http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2012/09/12/president...

Which are you? A liar, or just too stupid to read a simple transcript?

[Steve]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT), Milt <milt....@gmail.com>
wrote:

<CHUCKLE> Whine and whimpering lefties cannot quote where Obama
referred top the Benghazi attack as a terrorist attack.

[Milt]

On Oct 28, 3:23 pm, Steve <stevencan...@yahooooo.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT), Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com>

> >> >Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed *********in an
> >> >attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi************. Among those killed was our

> >> >Ambassador, Chris Stevens, as well as Foreign Service Officer Sean
> >> >Smith. We are still notifying the families of the others who were
> >> >killed. And today, the American people stand united in holding the
> >> >families of the four Americans in our thoughts and in our prayers.
>

> >> >The United States condemns in the strongest terms*********** this outrageous and
> >> >shocking attack.************ We're working with the government of Libya to secure

> >> >our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our
> >> >security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we

> >> >will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the *******killers******

> >> >who attacked our people.
>
> >> >Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects
> >> >all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs
> >> >of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of
> >> >senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to
> >> >unequivocally reject these brutal acts.
>
> >> >(...)
>
> >> >No ***acts of terror*** will ever shake the resolve of this great
> >> >nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that
> >> >we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the
> >> >very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our

> >> >commitment to see that justice is done for ******this terrible act.****** And make

> >> >no mistake, justice will be done.
>
> >> >But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark
> >> >contrast to those of their ***attackers.*** These four Americans stood
> >> >up for freedom and human dignity. They should give every American
> >> >great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our
> >> >flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in
> >> >freedom and with dignity.
>
> >> >We grieve with their families, but let us carry on their memory, and
> >> >let us continue their work of seeking a stronger America and a better
> >> >world for all of our children.
>
> >> >------------------------
>
> >> >There's also a video. I know you have a problem reading.
>
> >> Like I said before, he never once referred to the Libyan attack as a
> >> terrorist attack..   he sent his Press Secretary out to pass on the
> >> dishonest story about the video...   even though he'd already been
> >> told that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack.
>
> >Which are you? A liar, or just too stupid to read a simple transcript?
>
> <CHUCKLE> Whine and whimpering lefties cannot quote where Obama
> referred top the Benghazi attack as a terrorist attack.

I just did. See above, you illiterate liar. I added some emphasis to
assist you. He referrred to it as an act of terror. Next day, not two
weeks later. Forgive him for not using "terrrrrr" as a scare tactic,
as the previous administration did.

[Steve]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:33:17 -0700 (PDT), Milt <milt....@gmail.com>
wrote:

<LOL> He did no such thing. He me
merely used the term without referencing any specific event.


By the way, Milt, did you simply sluff off my challenge for you to
post all the information you <LOL> claim to know about me?

"I have the sorts of contacts that, if I feel threatened by something
someone is doing on the net, I can get an exact location of the person
that was using that IP address at that time.
It's not as hard as you might think, if you know the right people.
(Why do I picture you sweating hard about now?)"
--Milt Shook
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/bcaaa716404f7b49?

Canyon note: maybe it's because of Milt's very overactive
imagination.


"I used to do Internet surveillance for
another firm; tracking down people who misused trademarks in their
source code. I learned a lot of tricks and go to know a lot of people,
including many counsel at some major search engines."
--Milt.Shook.03 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/0b414548a47ea467


Canyon Note: Shook's "tricks" include extremely poor bluffs...