Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: "Black Eagle Lady"/"Dale Earnhardt" art

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 22, 2006, 11:18:44 PM1/22/06
to

"Renay" wrote:
> >Will Dockery wrote:
>
> >> someone sent me this photo of what appears to
> >> be one of your drawings. it must be called Black
> >> Eagle Lady because it says so in big red letters
> >> at the top. I've got it all ready in a file next to
> >> my illustration of Earnhardt. just to avoid any
> >> misunderstandings in the future, what do you
> >> think about my posting them both, side by side,
> >> on a web page, huh?
> >>
> >> heh.
> >
> > Go for it... spell my name correctly.
> >
> > I'll post the link under the title "Black Eagle Lady"... could get
> > interesting!
>
> *whew* good thing you said okay cuz
> I just accidentally posted a private reply
> to the whole newsgroup.
>
> my bad.

"Black Eagle Lady/Dale Earnhardt" by Dockery & St, James:
http://fuqudrunkery.blogspot.com/

No, not bad at all... in fact, I made a copy so we can fully promote this
merger of NASCAR and poetry... maybe get some poetry about Dale to post on
the site, as well as the Mp3 of "Black Eagle Lady"...

A shame you didn't have the class to get my name right, as requested, but on
future sites I can fix that.

Did you really /draw/ that? Looks like a retouched photograph...

--
"Mirror Twins" by Will Dockery:
http://www.myspace.com/dockeryconleytrio

"Autograph Of Zorro" by Will Dockery
http://www.kannibaal.nl/zorro.mp3


Renay

unread,
Jan 22, 2006, 11:26:05 PM1/22/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:2abd9$43d459bf$18d62363$18...@KNOLOGY.NET...

you're pathetic.

oh yeah, and as an artist you suck.

Renay

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 22, 2006, 11:36:29 PM1/22/06
to
Renay wrote:
>>Will Dockery wrote:
>
> >> >> someone sent me this photo of what appears to
> >> >> be one of your drawings. it must be called Black
> >> >> Eagle Lady because it says so in big red letters
> >> >> at the top. I've got it all ready in a file next to
> >> >> my illustration of Earnhardt. just to avoid any
> >> >> misunderstandings in the future, what do you
> >> >> think about my posting them both, side by side,
> >> >> on a web page, huh?
> >> >>
> >> >> heh.
> >> >
> >> > Go for it... spell my name correctly.
> >> >
> >> > I'll post the link under the title "Black Eagle Lady"... could get
> >> > interesting!
> >>
> >> *whew* good thing you said okay cuz
> >> I just accidentally posted a private reply
> >> to the whole newsgroup.
> >>
> >> my bad.
> >
> > No, not bad at all... in fact, I made a copy so we can fully promote this
> > merger of NASCAR and poetry... maybe get some poetry about Dale to post on
> > the site, as well as the Mp3 of "Black Eagle Lady"...
> >
> > A shame you didn't have the class to get my name right, as requested, but
> > on
> > future sites I can fix that.
>
> you're pathetic.

Aw, don't whine... I'll make you famous with our collaboration!

> oh yeah, and as an artist you suck.

You're a better artist than you are a poet, for sure.

--
"Mirror Twins" by Will Dockery:
http://www.myspace.com/dockeryconleytrio

"Black Eagle Lady/Dale Earnhardt" by Dockery/Saint James:
http://fuqudrunkery.blogspot.com/

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 12:26:12 AM1/23/06
to

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!) wrote:

> "Renay" wrote:
>
> >>> someone sent me this photo of what appears to
> >>> be one of your drawings. it must be called Black
> >>> Eagle Lady because it says so in big red letters
> >>> at the top. I've got it all ready in a file next to
> >>> my illustration of Earnhardt. just to avoid any
> >>> misunderstandings in the future, what do you
> >>> think about my posting them both, side by side,
> >>> on a web page, huh?
> >>>
> >>> heh.
> >>
> >> Ennui go.
> >
> > do you know how many gumdrops and lollipops I've made today?
> >
> > argh.
>
> But it's creative. :)

Karla's no doubt creaming in her jeans with sugar-rush-orgasms over the
image...

--
"Mirror Twins" by Will Dockery:
http://www.myspace.com/dockeryconleytrio

"Black Eagle Lady/Dale Earnhardt" by Dockery & Renay:
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1716/2160/320/compare.jpg

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:11:38 AM1/23/06
to
Renay wrote:
> "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>
> > That isn't an accurate rendering of your original illustration,
> > Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
>
> it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.

No, not really... here's the actual image:

http://www.lulu.com/dockery

> > The only remaining question is: WHY would anyone spend the time
> > and trouble to make a colored-pencil drawing of /Dale Earnhardt/?

Go figure...

--
"Mirror Twins" by Will Dockery:
http://www.myspace.com/dockeryconleytrio

"Black Eagle Lady/Dale Earnhardt" by Dockery & Renay:
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1716/2160/320/compare.jpg

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:25:26 AM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138000298.1...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

> Renay wrote:
>> "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>>
>> > That isn't an accurate rendering of your original illustration,
>> > Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
>>
>> it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
>
> No, not really... here's the actual image:
>
> http://www.lulu.com/dockery

uh, yeah, really, dumbfuck.

http://www.lulu.com/content/26894

Renay


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:29:57 AM1/23/06
to

"Renay" wrote:

> > Will Dockery wrote:
> >> "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>
> >> > That isn't an accurate rendering of your original illustration,
> >> > Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
> >>
> >> it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
> >
> > No, not really... here's the actual image:
> >
> > http://www.lulu.com/dockery
>
> uh, yeah, really

Yep.

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:41:02 AM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:39c7a$43d486b3$18d62363$30...@KNOLOGY.NET...

>
> "Renay" wrote:
>> > Will Dockery wrote:
>> >> "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>>
>> >> > That isn't an accurate rendering of your original illustration,
>> >> > Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
>> >>
>> >> it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
>> >
>> > No, not really... here's the actual image:
>> >
>> > http://www.lulu.com/dockery

did I mention you're a dumbfuck?

http://www.lulu.com/content/26894

Renay


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:42:46 AM1/23/06
to

"Renay" wrote:
> > Will Dockery wrote:
> >> "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>
> >> >> > That isn't an accurate rendering of your original illustration,
> >> >> > Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
> >> >>
> >> >> it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
> >> >
> >> > No, not really... here's the actual image:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.lulu.com/dockery
>
> did I mention

That you're a NASCAR lovin' bimbo?

No, so I just did, babe.

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:56:02 AM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:4ec3c$43d489b7$18d62363$32...@KNOLOGY.NET...

>
> "Renay" wrote:
>> > Will Dockery wrote:
>> >> "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > That isn't an accurate rendering of your original illustration,
>> >> >> > Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
>> >> >
>> >> > No, not really... here's the actual image:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.lulu.com/content/26894

>>
>> did I mention
>
> That you're a NASCAR lovin' bimbo?

whoa, that's harsh. next you're gonna say
something bad about my mother? challenge
me to a fight behind the monkey bars
at recess?

Renay


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:00:34 AM1/23/06
to

"Renay" wrote:
> > Will Dockery wrote:
> >> "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > That isn't an accurate rendering of your original illustration,
> >> >> >> > Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > No, not really... here's the actual image:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://www.lulu.com/content/26894
> >>
> >> did I mention
> >
> > That you're a NASCAR lovin' bimbo?
>
> whoa, that's harsh.

Seems an accurate description, even your poetry attempts center on the
subject:

----
please Mr. Earnhardt, sir,
could I blow my dead father all over you?

we hopscotched through nine casinos
him telling cocktail waitresses
she's only my daughter.
me looking fucksy at a cowboy playing blackjack
he's only my father.

he lectured me on economics
when I won fifteen dollars,
then tipped the keno kid five.
the boy worked hard.

we had a father-daughter chat
about the number on his phone bill.
who is he? do you love him?
will I meet him? can he ride?

his name is what?

in Virginia City, we ran laughing onto mainstreet
still wearing our campy photograph costumes
he won the gunfight.
I paid for lunch.

when he's dead, he wants me
to sprinkle his ashes over Dale Earnhardt.
if Dale won't let me, then I should use him
to soak up oil at Daytona instead.

I said I would, if he died during racing season
if not, I'll store him in the woodstove
'til the following summer

Renay
----

Heh... now /that's/ harsh.

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:28:09 AM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:cf8c2$43d49258$18d62363$40...@KNOLOGY.NET...
> Berryman's Legacy wrote:

>> On 2006-01-23 Renay said:
>>
>> > > That isn't an accurate rendering of your original illustration,
>> > > Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
>> >
>> > it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
>> >
>> > wazzup wit' DAT is he's to wet brained to size
>> > a graphic correctly. DUH.
>>
>> Actually, it appears that the aspect ratio was futzed up by
>> the web site to which the image was uploaded.
>>
>> Here's a direct link to the original drawing:
>> http://people.lulu.com/storage/users/884/17884/images/8658/pepper.jpg

>>
>> > > The only remaining question is: WHY would anyone spend the time
>> > > and trouble to make a colored-pencil drawing of /Dale Earnhardt/?
>> >
>> > hey man, a girl's gotta make a living.
>> > not everyone is educated or skilled
>> > enough to hand out pizza flyers for a living.
>> >
>> > Renay
>>
>> Waitaminute...someone paid you to make a drawing of Dale Earnhardt?
>> Hmmm. Does one smell Daddy's influence here?
>
> The father Renay wrote about "blowing" in the poem of hers I just
> reposted?
>
> Heh... what's a 'lil Freudian Slip between father and daughter?
>
>> See Renay's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
>> ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
>> http://NetPoets.here.nu
>
> Yep: a slack jawed NASCAR bimbo... she's even /drooling/ in the photo.

you get more desperate with every post.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:31:50 AM1/23/06
to

"Renay" wrote:
> "Will Dockery" wrote:
> > Berryman's Legacy wrote:
>

Speaking of /desperate/, Renay... your "art" is obviously just a touched up
photograph... nothing original or creative about it.

Mine's a freehand pen and ink drawing... no "cheating" involved.

You're a Karaoke artist!

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:45:33 AM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:c3900$43d4953e$18d62363$55...@KNOLOGY.NET...

nice try. no, it's all original. you *wish* your work was so good.

I do think it's cooler than hell you're now saying it's a photograph.

why am I not surprised that you're being a weasel, huh?


>
> Mine's a freehand pen and ink drawing... no "cheating" involved.

and mine is a freehand coloured pencil drawing.

yours sucks.
mine rocks.
get over it.

Renay

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:49:38 AM1/23/06
to

So you claim there's no photograph out there that this "drawing" is based
on? By it's very nature there's nothing "original" about this drawing.

Obviously this is a photograph you smudged over with some crayons.

Karla

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:43:59 AM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:49:38 -0500, "Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net>
wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.arts.poetry.comments/msg/270cf7c8dfe7c755

Dockery sniffs and stalks Renay to another site, blabbers about the Earnhardt
drawing, and then when she posts it, he shits in the playground. 'smatter,
Willy, Shadowville smoke get in your eyes?

Karla

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:20:27 AM1/23/06
to

"Karla" <kar...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:l499t194lk06g5t7p...@4ax.com...

> Dockery sniffs and stalks Renay to another site, blabbers about the Earnhardt
> drawing, and then when she posts it, he shits in the playground. 'smatter,
> Willy, Shadowville smoke get in your eyes?

If the best you can do is pick on poor dumb animals.

Fuck off, fat bitch.

Renay's drawing is silly. Take a picture.


--
AJ - "I'm much better than you." :)
- RAP and AAPC
Dylan Thomas, "Rage Poet of the Year",
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
- mikey cook memorial, (RIP)
Porn Compositing Award of Excellence
2005, 2006, 2007
- AUK, AHM "KOOK Trainer Emeritus"
(for training peewee(PJR) and mikey cook)
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
- 'ennis M Hammes Quitclaim Brevity Award
2002, 2003

Feel the love:
http://Clitin.Com
*** A Wanking Service Agency ***
(currently free)

Kook websites:
http://baba-nude.blogspot.com
http://baba-fart.blogspot.com
http://wormfarmer.blogspot.com

Usenet Porn-d'Art slideshows:
http://Clitin.Com/X3
http://Clitin.Com/Art-Cody
http://Clitin.Com/Art-PT
http://Clitin.Com/Art-CC
http://Clitin.Com/Art-VB
http://Clitin.Com/Chmi
http://Clitin.Com/Casey
http://Clitin.Com/AshleyLauren

Some personal movies:
http://Clitin.Com/GB.wmv
http://Clitin.Com/ZappyMorn.wmv

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 11:21:40 AM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:6b09a$43d49970$18d62363$85...@KNOLOGY.NET...

> So you claim there's no photograph out there that this "drawing" is based
> on? By it's very nature there's nothing "original" about this drawing.

there absolutely is a photograph it's based on. DUH.

would you like to see it, too?

> Obviously this is a photograph you smudged over with some crayons.

heh. sure it its, Drunkery.

it just fries your untalented ass that I showed your work next to mine,
doesn't it?

Renay

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 12:38:30 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" wrote

> > "Will Dockery" wrote:
> >> Berryman's Legacy wrote:
>
> >> That isn't an accurate rendering of your original
> >illustration,
> >> Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
> >
> > it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
> >
> >> Actually, it appears that the aspect ratio was futzed up by
> >> the web site to which the image was uploaded.
> >>
> >> Here's a direct link to the original drawing:
> >http://people.lulu.com/storage/users/884/17884/images/8658/pepper.jpg
> >>
> >> The only remaining question is: WHY would anyone spend the
> >time
> >> and trouble to make a colored-pencil drawing of /Dale
> >> Earnhardt/?

She's a NASCAR lovin' bimbo..?

Not that there's anything /wrong/ with that, but Renay has delusions of
being a great "artist" when all she's done is copy /someone elses'/ art...
the photographer of the original image... hopefully this person was credited
somewhere on the piece.

> >> Waitaminute...someone paid you to make a drawing of Dale Earnhardt?
> >> Hmmm. Does one smell Daddy's influence here?
> >>

> >> See Renay's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
> >> ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
> >> http://NetPoets.here.nu
> >>
> >> Yep: a slack jawed NASCAR bimbo... she's even /drooling/ in the
> >photo.
> >>

> >> Renay... your "art" is obviously just a touched
> >> > up
> >> > photograph... nothing original or creative about it.
> >>
> >> nice try. no, it's all original.
> >
> >So you claim there's no photograph out there that this "drawing" is based
> >on? By it's very nature there's nothing "original" about this drawing.
> >
> >Obviously this is a photograph you smudged over with some crayons.
>

> Dockery sniffs and stalks Renay to another site, blabbers about the
Earnhardt
> drawing,

Renay "blabbered" about how fantastic her drawing of Dale Earnhardt was,
when it turned out to be just a copy of someone elses' photograph... very
unoriginal and lacking any creativity.

Kind of like her "poetry", actually.

Barbara's Cat

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 1:05:42 PM1/23/06
to
Stupid Smegma Will Dockery stuttered:

> She's a NASCAR lovin' bimbo..?
>
> Not that there's anything /wrong/ with that, but Renay has delusions of
> being a great "artist" when all she's done is copy /someone elses'/ art...
> the photographer of the original image... hopefully this person was credited
> somewhere on the piece.
>

> Renay "blabbered" about how fantastic her drawing of Dale Earnhardt was,
> when it turned out to be just a copy of someone elses' photograph... very
> unoriginal and lacking any creativity.
>
> Kind of like her "poetry", actually.

Poor little baby Duckery; you just can't handle reality, can you?

--
Cm~

armpit

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 1:24:53 PM1/23/06
to
No one in RASN gives a shit about your silly little pissing contest. Just
because its about a drawing of a dead NASCAR driver doesn't mean its
on-topic for RASN, dumbass. Keep it to your own artsy-fartsy groups.

And BTW, your sorry-assed drawing sucks.


ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 1:26:46 PM1/23/06
to

Beau Blue

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 1:50:22 PM1/23/06
to
"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

>
>"Karla" wrote
>> > "Will Dockery" wrote:
>> >> Berryman's Legacy wrote:
>>
>> >> That isn't an accurate rendering of your original
>> >illustration,
>> >> Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
>> >
>> > it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
>> >
>> >> Actually, it appears that the aspect ratio was futzed up by
>> >> the web site to which the image was uploaded.
>> >>
>> >> Here's a direct link to the original drawing:
>> >http://people.lulu.com/storage/users/884/17884/images/8658/pepper.jpg
>> >>
>> >> The only remaining question is: WHY would anyone spend the
>> >time
>> >> and trouble to make a colored-pencil drawing of /Dale
>> >> Earnhardt/?

It's one of those things some people will pay other people to do?

>
>She's a NASCAR lovin' bimbo..?

And she likes money too? Imagine the sense of satisfaction combining
the two things, Twitch. Sit back .. now think about actually getting
real money for artistic endeavors. I know it'll seem beyond anything
remotely possible for you, but try. OK?

>
>Not that there's anything /wrong/ with that, but Renay has delusions of
>being a great "artist" when all she's done is copy /someone elses'/ art...
>the photographer of the original image... hopefully this person was credited
>somewhere on the piece.

What if she didn't use a photograph, but a model? Of course, that
would then probably be seen as some sort of escapade she'd have
to do penance for, huh?

So, she'd be expected to list the model's name somewhere, right
Twitch? Where would that somewhere be? On the drawing? "Model
provided by NASCAR look-a-likes, Detroit" tastefully scripted in the
lower left-hand corner?

>
>> >> Waitaminute...someone paid you to make a drawing of Dale Earnhardt?
>> >> Hmmm. Does one smell Daddy's influence here?

You'd be surprised at who has paid Renay for her artistic services,
Bill. Believe it, you ARE a clueless boob. It's hilarious.

>> >>
>> >> See Renay's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
>> >> ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
>> >> http://NetPoets.here.nu
>> >>
>> >> Yep: a slack jawed NASCAR bimbo... she's even /drooling/ in the
>> >photo.
>> >>
>> >> Renay... your "art" is obviously just a touched
>> >> > up
>> >> > photograph... nothing original or creative about it.
>> >>
>> >> nice try. no, it's all original.
>> >
>> >So you claim there's no photograph out there that this "drawing" is based
>> >on? By it's very nature there's nothing "original" about this drawing.
>> >
>> >Obviously this is a photograph you smudged over with some crayons.
>>
>> Dockery sniffs and stalks Renay to another site, blabbers about the
>Earnhardt
>> drawing,
>
>Renay "blabbered" about how fantastic her drawing of Dale Earnhardt was,
>when it turned out to be just a copy of someone elses' photograph... very
>unoriginal and lacking any creativity.

Well, it's good then it could generate any money at all, right? C'mon
Twitch, tell me the max amount you've been paid for one of your
'artisitic creations'? 5 figures? 4 figures? More than a hundred
bucks? less? certainly creative flyer-tossing paid at least THAT much
over the last couple months, right?

>
>Kind of like her "poetry", actually.

Remember, Twitch, you know even less about reading "poetry" than
you do about writing it. That's the sad truth of it, Bill, so - as
usual, your opinion is fairly worthless. So have you sent any material
to Basil yet? Any word when your trio will have an 'Artemis Records'
record contract? You waiting with baited breath?

-blue


~ Beau Blue Presents ~ <> http://members.cruzio.com/~jjwebb
Bill Minor * Robert Sward <> Internet Broadsides
Michael McNeilley <> Contemporary American Poetry

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 1:54:44 PM1/23/06
to

Beau Blue wrote:
> "Will Dockery" wrote:
> >"Karla" wrote

> >> >> Berryman's Legacy wrote:
>
> >> >> That isn't an accurate rendering of your original
> >> >illustration,
> >> >> Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
> >> >
> >> > it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
> >> >
> >> >> Actually, it appears that the aspect ratio was futzed up by
> >> >> the web site to which the image was uploaded.
> >> >>
> >> >> Here's a direct link to the original drawing:
> >> >http://people.lulu.com/storage/users/884/17884/images/8658/pepper.jpg
> >> >>
> >> >> The only remaining question is: WHY would anyone spend the
> >> >time
> >> >> and trouble to make a colored-pencil drawing of /Dale
> >> >> Earnhardt/?
>
> It's one of those things some people will pay other people to do?

Do you know if Renay paid the photographer that actually created the
work of art she copied for pay, Blue?

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:00:27 PM1/23/06
to
On 23 Jan 2006 10:54:44 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>Do you know if Renay paid the photographer that actually created the
>work of art she copied for pay, Blue?


I can see it all now in my crystal ball:

4,396 dinkery crossposts accusing Renay of copyright infringement
coming right up.

armpit

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:03:00 PM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138042484....@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>

STOP POSTING TO R.A.S.N.

WE REALLY DON'T F-ING CARE!!!!


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:10:29 PM1/23/06
to

"Renay" wrote:
> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>
> > So you claim there's no photograph out there that this "drawing" is
based
> > on? By it's very nature there's nothing "original" about this drawing.
>
> there absolutely is a photograph it's based on. DUH.
>
> would you like to see it, too?

Sure, and the name of the photographer, while you're at it... might as well
credit the sources you swipe from, right?

And which soap opera did you steal the "plot" for "Spectre" and all the
other trailer park confessionals also, perhaps?

> > Obviously this is a photograph you smudged over with some crayons.
>

> it just fries your untalented ass that I showed your work next to mine,
> doesn't it?

I don't get that excited over tracings of photographs of racecar drivers,
personally... though some might.

Beau Blue

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:11:20 PM1/23/06
to
"Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Beau Blue wrote:
>> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>> >"Karla" wrote
>> >> >> Berryman's Legacy wrote:
>>
>> >> >> That isn't an accurate rendering of your original
>> >> >illustration,
>> >> >> Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
>> >> >
>> >> > it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
>> >> >
>> >> >> Actually, it appears that the aspect ratio was futzed up by
>> >> >> the web site to which the image was uploaded.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here's a direct link to the original drawing:
>> >> >http://people.lulu.com/storage/users/884/17884/images/8658/pepper.jpg
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The only remaining question is: WHY would anyone spend the
>> >> >time
>> >> >> and trouble to make a colored-pencil drawing of /Dale
>> >> >> Earnhardt/?
>>
>> It's one of those things some people will pay other people to do?
>
>Do you know if Renay paid the photographer that actually created the
>work of art she copied for pay, Blue?

So, then the answer is you've never been paid even a dime for anything
but totin' bread, huh Bill? That's sad you know. Well, keep tryin'.

But you should know these constant demonstrations of yours, of the
stereotypical dumb southern boy, are NOT going to help.

-blue

The guys in the nascar group are pissed you've added 'em to the
distribution. See, that dumb southern boy routine of yours don't make
it there either. Geezuz, could you finally take a clue?

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:13:09 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:10:29 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

>I don't get that excited over tracings of photographs of racecar drivers,
>personally... though some might.

Get fucken real, moron.

You're so excited, you'll be posting on this subject and in this
thread for months.

Prove me wrong.

Just this once.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:16:46 PM1/23/06
to

Beau Blue wrote:
> >> "Will Dockery" wrote:
> >> >"Karla" wrote
> >> >> >> Berryman's Legacy wrote:
>
> >> >> >> That isn't an accurate rendering of your original
> >> >> >illustration,
> >> >> >> Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Actually, it appears that the aspect ratio was futzed up by
> >> >> >> the web site to which the image was uploaded.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Here's a direct link to the original drawing:
> >> >> >http://people.lulu.com/storage/users/884/17884/images/8658/pepper.jpg
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The only remaining question is: WHY would anyone spend the
> >> >> >time
> >> >> >> and trouble to make a colored-pencil drawing of /Dale
> >> >> >> Earnhardt/?
> >>
> >> It's one of those things some people will pay other people to do?
> >
> >Do you know if Renay paid the photographer that actually created the
> >work of art she copied for pay, Blue?
>
> So, then the answer is you've never been paid even a dime for

Tracing a photo of Dale Ernhardt? Nope.

> The guys in the nascar group are pissed

It's Renay's target audience.

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:19:33 PM1/23/06
to

"armpit" <udont...@myemail.addy> wrote in message news:089Bf.2915$5O2...@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

> No one in RASN gives a shit about your silly little pissing contest. Just because its about a drawing of a dead NASCAR driver
> doesn't mean its on-topic for RASN, dumbass. Keep it to your own artsy-fartsy groups.
>
> And BTW, your sorry-assed drawing sucks.

I knew she was taking a big chance.

Hey!!!

Check out this movie, where I blow the doors off.

http://clitin.com/ZappyMorn.wmv

--
AJ - http://clitin.com
(the biggest clit in pornetry)


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:21:14 PM1/23/06
to
ggamble wrote:

> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>
> >I don't get that excited over tracings of photographs of racecar drivers,
> >personally... though some might.
>
> Get fucken real, moron.

Says the burned out non-poet gasfly.

> You're so excited, you'll be posting on this subject and in this
> thread for months.

I'll /always/ respond... just as you probably will.

Prove me wrong.

Ignore this thread.

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:30:12 PM1/23/06
to

"armpit" <udont...@myemail.addy> wrote in message news:LH9Bf.2935$5O2....@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

>
> "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1138042484....@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>
> STOP POSTING TO R.A.S.N.
>
> WE REALLY DON'T F-ING CARE!!!!

Could you express your feelings in a poem?

Because you've been so nice,
check these out:

I don't share my wife with just anybody.

You impress me.

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:31:17 PM1/23/06
to

"Beau Blue" <Beau...@comcast.net> wrote in message news:ju9at11c4poholcuv...@4ax.com...


> The guys in the nascar group are pissed you've added 'em to the
> distribution. See, that dumb southern boy routine of yours don't make
> it there either. Geezuz, could you finally take a clue?

Heh...

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:32:46 PM1/23/06
to
On 23 Jan 2006 11:21:14 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>ggamble wrote:


>> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>>
>> >I don't get that excited over tracings of photographs of racecar drivers,
>> >personally... though some might.
>>
>> Get fucken real, moron.
>
>Says the burned out non-poet gasfly.
>
>> You're so excited, you'll be posting on this subject and in this
>> thread for months.
>
>I'll /always/ respond... just as you probably will.
>

Have you ever had an original thought in your life?

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:40:14 PM1/23/06
to

ggamble wrote:
> >> "Will Dockery" wrote:
> >>
> >> >I don't get that excited over tracings of photographs of racecar drivers,
> >> >personally... though some might.
> >>
> >> Get fucken real, moron.
> >
> >Says the burned out non-poet gasfly.
> >
> >> You're so excited, you'll be posting on this subject and in this
> >> thread for months.
> >
> >I'll /always/ respond... just as you probably will.
>
> Have you ever had an original thought in your life?

You wouldn't know an /original thought/ if the ghost of Dale Earnhardt
ran over you with one, Gary.

Thanks for proving me right, though... get set for 4,000 one sentence
blubberings from GG, althernated with copy-n-paste one liners.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:44:50 PM1/23/06
to
On 23 Jan 2006 11:40:14 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>


>ggamble wrote:
>> >> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >I don't get that excited over tracings of photographs of racecar drivers,
>> >> >personally... though some might.
>> >>
>> >> Get fucken real, moron.
>> >
>> >Says the burned out non-poet gasfly.
>> >
>> >> You're so excited, you'll be posting on this subject and in this
>> >> thread for months.
>> >
>> >I'll /always/ respond... just as you probably will.
>>
>> Have you ever had an original thought in your life?
>
>You wouldn't know an /original thought/ if the ghost of Dale Earnhardt
>ran over you with one, Gary.
>
>Thanks for proving me right, though... get set for 4,000 one sentence
>blubberings from GG, althernated with copy-n-paste one liners.


You're fucken pathetic.

We pity you.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 2:49:54 PM1/23/06
to

Gee, I'm touched by your concern, Gary.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:01:24 PM1/23/06
to

"Renay" wrote:
> >> > "Will Dockery" wrote:
>
> >> > > Mine's a freehand pen and ink drawing... no "cheating" involved.
> >> >
> >> > and mine is a freehand coloured pencil drawing.
> >> >
> >> > yours sucks.
> >> > mine rocks.
> >> > get over it.
> >>
> >> Is THAT what this has been about?
> >>
> >> The two styles aren't comparable, Ren. Yours is realistic
> >> portraiture; Dockery's is more sorta semi-Goth impressionistic.
> >>
> >> Can't judge Dali's 'The Persistence of Memory' using the same
> >> criteria as for Van Gogh's first self-portrait (the one before
> >> he went wacky).
> >>
> >> You can /prefer/ one style over the other, but that's a sub-
> >> jective judgment call.
> >
> > Plus the fact that apparently Renay just traced over someone elses'
> > photograph... even an unpretentious NASCAR fan's doodle would be more
> > creative and original.
>
> riiiight, Drunkery. first it was a touched up photo now it's a tracing.
>
> you just can't fucken stand it that I can look at a photo and
> freehand what I see, can you?
>
> green is definitely your color!

I like green... in fact it may be my favorite, although blue is nice, too.

Not that fond of Dale Earnhardt, or drawings swiped from a photo of him [by
whichever method], taken by an apparently unknown photographer, though.

But to each his own.

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:13:40 PM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:c7266$43d53608$18d62363$10...@KNOLOGY.NET...

of course you're not. I'll bet you're completely disinterested!

this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.

Renay


ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:15:50 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:01:24 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

> swiped

Karla

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:04:28 PM1/23/06
to
In article <1138043806.6...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, Will Dockery
says...

1. Bill, obsessed with Renay, stalks her over at fireside and reads that she did
a drawing of Dale Earnhardt.

2. Bill, obsessed with Renay, copies and pastes Renay's post onto usenet.

3. Bill, obsessed with Renay, makes numerous posts challening Renay to post her
drawing.

4. Bill, obsessed with Renay, displays his utter lack of knowledge regarding art
by accusing Renay of using a crayon over a photograph, by accusing Renay of
tracing a photograph, by accusing Renay of stealing from the photographer, etc.
One desperate pizza boi, here.

5. Bill, overcome by obsession and self-loathing, makes complimentary posts
about Renay's drawing followed by accusatory posts about Renay's drawing all
within minutes of each other.

6. Bill, desperate for attention, keeps the threads alive with frivolous
accusations.

7. Bill, total hypocrite that he is, continues to accuse Renay of all kinds of
wrong-doing while continuing to publish a link to the drawing.

Wow, did you get owned.

Karla

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:33:38 PM1/23/06
to

In Dale Ernhardt, NASCAR, and most other sports, yes... that entire scene
has always bored me.

If it "rocks" for you, go for it.

> this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.

Oh yeah, I'll be here.

Keep posting, I'll respond, babe... that's what Usenet is all about.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:38:28 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" wrote:
>
> 1. Bill, obsessed with Renay

I see you're confused again, Karla.

Renay bragged about her Dale Earnhardt drawing, so why shouldn't she have
posted it so we could see how great it really was.... turned out to be
nothing but a drawing copied from a photograph.

Nothing creative or original about it... hackwork.

j r sherman

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:38:18 PM1/23/06
to
In article <c7266$43d53608$18d62363$10...@KNOLOGY.NET>, Will Dockery says...

hold on a second there, stinky.... are you actually saying that your piece of
shit, worse than a fourth grader embarrassment you call a drawing is better than
Renay's Dale drawing???

you're kidding, right? your drawing is a joke! a laughable and embarrasing
mediocrity, just like everything you do.

christ, i go away for a couple of months, visit Europe, and come back and find
that you're STILL as big a loser as always.

what a sad little man you've become, dockery. sad-sad-sad.

sad.


--
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Astral projection isn't just a theory ."

A. Real Dope
------------------------------------------------------------------

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:01:01 PM1/23/06
to

Hey Hey!

My favorite little pal is back!

j r sherman

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 3:41:34 PM1/23/06
to
In article <-dydnYChL-t...@comcast.com>, Renay says...

>
>> Not that fond of Dale Earnhardt, or drawings swiped from a photo of him
>> [by
>> whichever method], taken by an apparently unknown photographer, though.
>
>of course you're not. I'll bet you're completely disinterested!
>
>this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.
>
>Renay

hey, someone let me know, is dockery actually trying to defend that wretched
piece of shit drawing of his???

he's kidding, right? he thinks that sad-ass-eagle-shit drawing of his is worth
looking at???

now THAT'S scary!!!

love and kisses,

j r sherman

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:10:37 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:01:01 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

> little

Barbara's Cat

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:19:17 PM1/23/06
to
In article <dr3f1...@drn.newsguy.com>,

j r sherman <jr...@earthlink.net> said:

> In article <-dydnYChL-t...@comcast.com>, Renay says...
> >
> >> Not that fond of Dale Earnhardt, or drawings swiped from a photo of him
> >> [by
> >> whichever method], taken by an apparently unknown photographer, though.
> >
> >of course you're not. I'll bet you're completely disinterested!
> >
> >this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.
> >
> >Renay
>
> hey, someone let me know, is dockery actually trying to defend that wretched
> piece of shit drawing of his???

That would be the case. Over a hundred posts so far
and the post count is climbing by the minute.

> he's kidding, right? he thinks that sad-ass-eagle-shit drawing of his is worth
> looking at???

I do believe Duckery is dead fucken serious.
Okay, maybe not the fucken part or the serious part,
but definitely the other part.

> now THAT'S scary!!!
>
> love and kisses,
>
> j r sherman

<waves> Good to see you, Mr Sherman. How is the missus?

--
Cm~


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:20:04 PM1/23/06
to

"j r sherman" wrote:
>
> hey, someone let me know, is dockery actually trying to defend that
wretched
> piece of shit drawing of his???

Since the drawing's almost 20 years old, I don't plan on it...

I prefer to laugh at the NASCAR lovin' bimbo's Dale Earnhardt swipe.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:21:53 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:20:04 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

> swipe.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:33:34 PM1/23/06
to

"Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)" wrote:

> "Beau Blue" wrote:
>
> > The guys in the nascar group are pissed you've added 'em to the
> > distribution.
>
> Heh...

They noticed that Renay's drawing was a tracing of another person's creative
work.

Karla

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:14:24 PM1/23/06
to
In article <dr3f1...@drn.newsguy.com>, j r sherman says...

>
>In article <-dydnYChL-t...@comcast.com>, Renay says...
>>
>>> Not that fond of Dale Earnhardt, or drawings swiped from a photo of him
>>> [by
>>> whichever method], taken by an apparently unknown photographer, though.
>>
>>of course you're not. I'll bet you're completely disinterested!
>>
>>this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.
>>
>>Renay
>
>hey, someone let me know, is dockery actually trying to defend that wretched
>piece of shit drawing of his???
>
>he's kidding, right? he thinks that sad-ass-eagle-shit drawing of his is worth
>looking at???
>
>now THAT'S scary!!!
>
>love and kisses,
>
>j r sherman

Welcome back, j r. Ya, dockery is is full meltdown mode and now that you're
back, all of usenet will suffer his disintegration. You know, cross-posting
where people could care less and trying to hide his embarrassment by making up
lies about Renay's art. Didn't her drawing rock! She so totally owned bill
it's not funny.

Karla

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:44:23 PM1/23/06
to

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:45:09 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" wrote:
>
> Welcome back, j r. Ya, dockery is is full meltdown mode and now that
you're
> back, all of usenet will suffer his disintegration.

I'm glad to see the little feller back, Karla.

Let the games begin!

Karla

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:34:17 PM1/23/06
to
In article <41572$43d53d97$18d62363$17...@KNOLOGY.NET>, Will Dockery says...

First, you hunted down a post by Renay on a non-usenet board and then posted it
on usenet, so you weren't just "responding". Second, now that she's totally
owned you, you're incapable of gracious behavior and must "react" to everyone
laughing at you. Got that, bill?

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:56:05 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" wrote:
>
> where people could care less

Don't you mean "couldn't care less", Karla?

> and trying to hide his embarrassment by making up
> lies about Renay's art.

You mean that really isn't Dale Earnhardt in the drawing she swiped from a
photograph?

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:59:16 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" wrote:
>
> First, you hunted down a post by Renay

Hunted down?

I simply read the post and had a laugh about it here, you confused old drama
queen.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:00:38 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:59:16 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

>I simply read the post and had a laugh about it here


That's what we do with all your posts.

heh

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:00:49 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:45:09 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

> little

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:01:07 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:56:05 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

> swiped

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:05:35 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" wrote:
>
> you're incapable of gracious behavior

I was pretty "gracious" about Renay taking my picture and posting it on her
website without doing the /one thing/ I requested, which was to credit me
with the piece.

Now that I'm using the two pieces of art, i've made sure full credit is
given to both of us... only thing missing is credit for the person who
created the image that renay "borrowed" to trace her DE drawing.

If she ever does give the photographer his due credit, I'll probably add
him.

I'm fair like that.

j r sherman

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:54:26 PM1/23/06
to
In article <dr3gv...@drn.newsguy.com>, Karla says...

>
>>he's kidding, right? he thinks that sad-ass-eagle-shit drawing of his is worth
>>looking at???
>>
>>now THAT'S scary!!!
>>
>>love and kisses,
>>
>>j r sherman
>
>Welcome back, j r.

Ms. Karla! i return from Europe, Halifax and points west.

>Ya, dockery is is full meltdown mode and now that you're
>back, all of usenet will suffer his disintegration.

don't forget laugh, Ms. Karla. usenet always laughs at dockery.

>You know, cross-posting
>where people could care less and trying to hide his embarrassment by making up
>lies about Renay's art.

it's as sure as 2+2=4, when dockery gets his ass kicked he starts to lie, over
and over and over again. all he has is lies, of course.

>Didn't her drawing rock!

absolutely! i was able to see her first draft all the way to the final product.
it's great!

>She so totally owned bill it's not funny.

not a difficult achievement, of course. heh...

good to see you again, Karla!

love and kisses,

j r sherman


j r sherman

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:47:23 PM1/23/06
to
In article <60a0c$43d5440b$18d62363$18...@KNOLOGY.NET>, Will Dockery says...

>
>
>Hey Hey!
>
>My favorite little pal is back!

god, are you so easy.

but seriously, you actually defend that piece of shit thing-bald-ass-lady, or
whatever it is you call it, drawing? what a joke. that thing-shit-drawing is as
bad as your writing, and your writing is nothing more than heaping slops of
shit.

you really are clueless, aren't you?

j r sherman

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 4:59:17 PM1/23/06
to
In article <f1899$43d54ba3$18d62363$19...@KNOLOGY.NET>, Will Dockery says...

>
>
>"Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)" wrote:
>> "Beau Blue" wrote:
>>
>> > The guys in the nascar group are pissed you've added 'em to the
>> > distribution.
>>
>> Heh...
>
>They noticed that Renay's drawing was a tracing of another person's creative
>work.

actually, stinky, that's a lie. i saw the metamorphosis of the drawing from
start to end. there was no tracing what so ever. none. all free hand.

all.

seems like your getting your ever-swelling fat ass kicked, and you have to
resort to lies.

same old sad dockery.

when do we start hearing about your dead ex-wife? it's only a matter of time.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:15:53 PM1/23/06
to

"j r sherman" wrote:
> Will Dockery says...
>
> >Hey Hey!
> >
> >My favorite little pal is back!
>
> god,

I thought that was Michael Cook?

> are you so easy.

That's what I like about you, actually... I look forward to the hundreds of
posts we'll share over the next few hours...

> but seriously, you actually defend that piece of shit thing-bald-ass-lady,
or
> whatever it is you call it, drawing?

No, but you're here to defend Renay's drawing of... heh... Dale Earnhardt,
right?

Heh.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:18:21 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:05:35 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

>
>I was pretty "gracious" about Renay taking my picture and posting it on her
>website without doing the /one thing/ I requested, which was to credit me
>with the piece.


Why complain, dickhead?

Now you have another thing to whine about for the next four months.


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:18:52 PM1/23/06
to

"j r sherman" wrote:
>
> absolutely! i was able to see her first draft all the way to the final
product.

You can name the photographer Renay swiped the image from, then?

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:19:43 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:15:53 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

>That's what I lie about

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:20:25 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:18:52 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

>swiped

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:45:32 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" <kar...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:dr3gv...@drn.newsguy.com...

> In article <dr3f1...@drn.newsguy.com>, j r sherman says...
>>
>>In article <-dydnYChL-t...@comcast.com>, Renay says...
>>>
>>>> Not that fond of Dale Earnhardt, or drawings swiped from a photo of him
>>>> [by
>>>> whichever method], taken by an apparently unknown photographer, though.
>>>
>>>of course you're not. I'll bet you're completely disinterested!
>>>
>>>this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.
>>>
>>>Renay
>>
>>hey, someone let me know, is dockery actually trying to defend that wretched
>>piece of shit drawing of his???
>>
>>he's kidding, right? he thinks that sad-ass-eagle-shit drawing of his is worth
>>looking at???

VASTLY better than any contenders, but well come
on her back... jr midget...

>>
>>now THAT'S scary!!!

Heh...

>>
>>love and kisses,
>>
>>j r sherman
>
> Welcome back, j r. Ya, dockery is is full meltdown mode

But he's clearly won, just ass your's is HUGE.

> and now that you're
> back, all of usenet will suffer his disintegration. You know, cross-posting
> where people could care less and trying to hide his embarrassment by making up
> lies about Renay's art.

Where? .. .... .. "go fish" fat bitch.

> Didn't her drawing rock! She so totally owned bill
> it's not funny.

Heh... But you are a moron.


--
AJ - "I'm much better than you." :)
- RAP and AAPC
Dylan Thomas, "Rage Poet of the Year",
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
- mikey cook memorial, (RIP)
Porn Compositing Award of Excellence
2005, 2006, 2007
- AUK, AHM "KOOK Trainer Emeritus"
(for training peewee(PJR) and mikey cook)
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
- 'ennis M Hammes Quitclaim Brevity Award
2002, 2003

Feel the love:
http://Clitin.Com
*** A Wanking Service Agency ***
(currently free)

Kook websites:
http://baba-nude.blogspot.com
http://baba-fart.blogspot.com
http://wormfarmer.blogspot.com

Usenet Porn-d'Art slideshows:
http://Clitin.Com/X3
http://Clitin.Com/Art-Cody
http://Clitin.Com/Art-PT
http://Clitin.Com/Art-CC
http://Clitin.Com/Art-VB
http://Clitin.Com/Chmi
http://Clitin.Com/Casey
http://Clitin.Com/AshleyLauren

Some personal movies:
http://Clitin.Com/GB.wmv
http://Clitin.Com/ZappyMorn.wmv

>
> Karla
>


Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:48:30 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" <kar...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:dr3i4...@drn.newsguy.com...

> First, you hunted down a post by Renay on a non-usenet board and then posted it
> on usenet, so you weren't just "responding".

mikey, the ghetto moron fished my pic out of wherever and made
shit as dumbass as this:

http://the-deal.blogspot.com/

> Second, now that she's totally
> owned you, you're incapable of gracious behavior and must "react" to everyone
> laughing at you. Got that, bill?

When your fat ass gets out of the sandbox
get a modern dildo.

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:33:56 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" <kar...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:dr3cs...@drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <1138043806.6...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, Will
> Dockery
> says...
>>
>>
>>Beau Blue wrote:
>>> >> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>>> >> >"Karla" wrote
>>> >> >> >> Berryman's Legacy wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >> >> That isn't an accurate rendering of your original
>>> >> >> >illustration,
>>> >> >> >> Dock. It's "squished." Wazzup wit' DAT?
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > it is EXACTLY the way it was displayed online.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> Actually, it appears that the aspect ratio was futzed up by
>>> >> >> >> the web site to which the image was uploaded.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Here's a direct link to the original drawing:
>>> >> >> >http://people.lulu.com/storage/users/884/17884/images/8658/pepper.jpg
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> The only remaining question is: WHY would anyone spend the
>>> >> >> >time
>>> >> >> >> and trouble to make a colored-pencil drawing of /Dale
>>> >> >> >> Earnhardt/?
>>> >>
>>> >> It's one of those things some people will pay other people to do?
>>> >
>>> >Do you know if Renay paid the photographer that actually created the
>>> >work of art she copied for pay, Blue?
>>>
>>> So, then the answer is you've never been paid even a dime for
>>
>>Tracing a photo of Dale Ernhardt? Nope.

>>
>>> The guys in the nascar group are pissed
>>
>>It's Renay's target audience.

>>
>>--
>>"Mirror Twins" by Will Dockery:
>>http://www.myspace.com/dockeryconleytrio
>>
>>"Black Eagle Lady/Dale Earnhardt" by Dockery & Renay:
>>http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1716/2160/320/compare.jpg
>
> 1. Bill, obsessed with Renay, stalks her over at fireside and reads that
> she did
> a drawing of Dale Earnhardt.
>
> 2. Bill, obsessed with Renay, copies and pastes Renay's post onto usenet.
>
> 3. Bill, obsessed with Renay, makes numerous posts challening Renay to
> post her
> drawing.
>
> 4. Bill, obsessed with Renay, displays his utter lack of knowledge
> regarding art
> by accusing Renay of using a crayon over a photograph, by accusing Renay
> of
> tracing a photograph, by accusing Renay of stealing from the photographer,
> etc.
> One desperate pizza boi, here.
>
> 5. Bill, overcome by obsession and self-loathing, makes complimentary
> posts
> about Renay's drawing followed by accusatory posts about Renay's drawing
> all
> within minutes of each other.
>
> 6. Bill, desperate for attention, keeps the threads alive with frivolous
> accusations.
>
> 7. Bill, total hypocrite that he is, continues to accuse Renay of all
> kinds of
> wrong-doing while continuing to publish a link to the drawing.
>
> Wow, did you get owned.
>
> Karla

I think it may have been my finest work.

the drawing was pretty good, too.

;)

Renay


Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:55:45 PM1/23/06
to

"Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:8c6dnW3ZIat...@comcast.com...

> I think it may have been my finest work.

You're lame, but with the right attitude you can
make me lick your leather boots, bitch.

>
> the drawing was pretty good, too.

Heh...

>
> ;)

..

>
> Renay
>
>


Karla

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:16:39 PM1/23/06
to
In article <7079a$43d5532d$18d62363$21...@KNOLOGY.NET>, Will Dockery says...

>
>
>"Karla" wrote:
>>
>> you're incapable of gracious behavior
>
>I was pretty "gracious" about Renay taking my picture and posting it on her
>website without doing the /one thing/ I requested, which was to credit me
>with the piece.

Are you saying that isn't your name on your "art"?

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:40:58 PM1/23/06
to

"j r sherman" <jr...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:dr3f1...@drn.newsguy.com...

> In article <-dydnYChL-t...@comcast.com>, Renay says...
>>
>>> Not that fond of Dale Earnhardt, or drawings swiped from a photo of him
>>> [by
>>> whichever method], taken by an apparently unknown photographer, though.
>>
>>of course you're not. I'll bet you're completely disinterested!
>>
>>this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.
>>
>>Renay
>
> hey, someone let me know, is dockery actually trying to defend that
> wretched
> piece of shit drawing of his???
>
> he's kidding, right? he thinks that sad-ass-eagle-shit drawing of his is
> worth
> looking at???
>
> now THAT'S scary!!!

>
> love and kisses,
>
> j r sherman


you know how bored I get when I'm drawing
the same thing over and over! yesterday was
worse than usual. I was a baaaaaaaad girrrrrl
while you were gone.

speaking of, what did you bring me?

uh, I mean,

how are you and what's the news?

no, really, that's what I meant!

you were missed.

*smooch*

Renay

p.s. tell D. it's a strictly platonic, welcome home
on-the-cheek. *smooch* there's one for her, too

p.p.s. you may or may not be a member of the
cabal. Rob is in charge of the list but he's not
putting out for me. (gosh, did that sound the
way I think it did?) ;)

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:44:06 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" wrote

> >Will Dockery wrote:
>
> >> you're incapable of gracious behavior
> >
> >I was pretty "gracious" about Renay taking my picture and posting it on
her
> >website without doing the /one thing/ I requested, which was to credit me
> >with the piece.
>
> Are you saying that isn't your name on your "art"?

Not in a readable form... my /signiture/ is on it... no credit line, though.

Understandable that Renay left credit to herself off, since the drawing is
plagiarised from a photograph, though.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:46:24 PM1/23/06
to

"j r sherman" wrote:
>
> i saw the metamorphosis of the drawing from
> start to end.

So did you notice the name of the photographer Renay swiped her drawing
from?

If you remember, I can add a credit to him on the link.

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:09:45 PM1/23/06
to
What a pit bitch...


"Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:z4OdndUlReL...@comcast.com...

Peter J Ross

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:46:34 PM1/23/06
to
On 23 Jan 2006 12:41:34 -0800, j r sherman <jr...@earthlink.net> wrote
in rec.arts.poems:

> In article <-dydnYChL-t...@comcast.com>, Renay says...
>>
>>> Not that fond of Dale Earnhardt, or drawings swiped from a photo of him
>>> [by
>>> whichever method], taken by an apparently unknown photographer, though.
>>
>>of course you're not. I'll bet you're completely disinterested!
>>
>>this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.
>>
>>Renay
>
> hey, someone let me know, is dockery actually trying to defend that wretched
> piece of shit drawing of his???

Yes, in much the same way as he's tried to defend all his unspeakable
shit.

> he's kidding, right?

Surely you can't have been away long enough to have forgotten that
Dockery has no sense of humour?

> he thinks that sad-ass-eagle-shit drawing of his is worth
> looking at???

I've been looking at it for several minutes, trying to work out what
the white thing on the right with the black edging is meant to be. It
looks more like a fat penguin than anything else.

Also, the woman looks like a zombie to me, but perhaps she'd merely
been present at one of Will's karaoke sessions.

> now THAT'S scary!!!

In a hilarious way.

> love and kisses,
>
> j r sherman

Welcome back. I suppose I have to give up the comfortable chair now.

PJR :-)
--
Have you been touched ___ ___ Hammer of Thor, Jan 2006
by His noodly / _ \ / _ \
appendage? ( (_) )( (_) ) Pierre Salinger Memorial
\_ _/ \_ _/ Hook, Line & Sinker, Dec
STOP GLOBAL __ _.-\\----//--._ 2003 & May 2005
WARMING _ / _\___.-'/ _| / _\ /\/\`-._.-.__ _
NOW, (_\_)| \___ ||_ ((_ //\/\\ _.-._ \-' ) AHM Wittiest
JIM LAD! \__) __) | _| _) ) || || (_ \_.-' Troll of the
/_-. || \_/ || .-'-.\ Year, 2003
http:// _._// / .--._______.-'\ \ \\__._ 2004 & 2005
www. /_._/ \ \ )) \__._)
venganza (/ _.-') ( `-._ wsd 42 ~ mhm 34x8
.org/ (_.-' :F_P: `--._) smeeter 30 ~ mwpl 12

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:12:07 PM1/23/06
to

"Peter J Ross" <p...@kookbusters.org> wrote in message news:slrndtan6...@nntp.petitmorte.net...

...to flex a moral fibreee....

Karla

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:38:55 PM1/23/06
to
In article <23dBf.24201$PL5....@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, Tom Bishop
says...

>mikey, the ghetto moron fished my pic out of wherever and made
>shit as dumbass as this:

Cliche. Try to find some fresh images. The assonance you got going with
"fished my pic" is OK but your numerous hourly postings weaken the shock value
of "ghetto moron" and "dumbass." Keep trying!

Karla

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:57:27 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:46:24 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

> swiped

ggamble

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 5:58:24 PM1/23/06
to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:44:06 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

>plagiarised from a photograph


Could this dumbass be any more predictable?


Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:01:22 PM1/23/06
to

"Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)" <ajinnN...@here.nu> wrote in message
news:R9dBf.24205$PL5....@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...

>
> "Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:8c6dnW3ZIat...@comcast.com...
>
>> I think it may have been my finest work.
>
> You're lame, but with the right attitude you can
> make me lick your leather boots, bitch.

oh please, you're just hoping I'll turn on YOU next.

LAME?

PI, Shaw!

I AM the puppet master. my scenes are complex
and perfectly timed. obviously I can draw well
enough to make folks with no artistic experience
or education think it's photographic. as an added
bonus, I got some weirdo to invent a whole new
category of art to try and save face for some other weirdo.

lame?

HA!

*whipcrack*

WORSHIP ME OR FACE MY WRATH!

Renay

(damn. apparently I'm a pretty good dom, too. go figure.)

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:05:31 PM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:88896$43d55cb6$18d62363$23...@KNOLOGY.NET...

>
> "j r sherman" wrote:
>>
>> i saw the metamorphosis of the drawing from
>> start to end.
>
> So did you notice the name of the photographer Renay swiped her drawing
> from?
>
> If you remember, I can add a credit to him on the link.


I so fucken own you.

Renay


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:06:20 PM1/23/06
to

"Renay" wrote:
>
> obviously I can draw well
> enough to make folks with no artistic experience
> or education think it's photographic.

It'll be interesting to actually see the photograph...

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:40:04 PM1/23/06
to

"Karla" <kar...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:dr3lt...@drn.newsguy.com...

> In article <23dBf.24201$PL5....@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, Tom Bishop
> says...
>
>>mikey, the ghetto moron fished my pic out of wherever and made
>>shit as dumbass as this:
>
> Cliche.

"Caves of Belize"

The clam's siphon goth hurl a cloud of silicon.
The pearl's adventure starts with a grit.
Give me some black for "goth" and lay the jelly on.
I say: "Little Debby's got the fit."

> Try to find some fresh images.

I saw a poem foaming off the mountain
I tried to grab my camera but the focus
evaporated.

The sunset waited for red-wash hour;
and the carcasses of the shellfish
cracked the shore;

so

much depends on

white shellfish.

> The assonance you got going with
> "fished my pic" is OK but your numerous hourly postings weaken the shock value
> of "ghetto moron" and "dumbass." Keep trying!
>
> Karla

I am the Jinn.
(they /say/ "drink more de-caf")

Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:56:17 PM1/23/06
to

"Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:-8qdnfpDsof...@comcast.com...

>
> "Jinn, (not Tom Bishop!)" <ajinnN...@here.nu> wrote in message news:R9dBf.24205$PL5....@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:8c6dnW3ZIat...@comcast.com...
>>
>>> I think it may have been my finest work.
>>
>> You're lame, but with the right attitude you can
>> make me lick your leather boots, bitch.
>
> oh please, you're just hoping I'll turn on YOU next.

I'm patient. Take your time.
I'm really easy...

>
> LAME?
>
> PI, Shaw!

Of course. Anything you want, Mistress.


>
> I AM the puppet master. my scenes are complex
> and perfectly timed. obviously I can draw well
> enough to make folks with no artistic experience
> or education think it's photographic. as an added
> bonus, I got some weirdo to invent a whole new
> category of art to try and save face for some other weirdo.

I'm your cerelean blue, Mistress.
All nudity I devote to you.

>
> lame?
>
> HA!
>
> *whipcrack*

(If only I hadn't given away the singletail
to the Sacramento Sadistic Mistress....)

Yes, Mistress Renay...

>
> WORSHIP ME OR FACE MY WRATH!
>
> Renay
>
> (damn. apparently I'm a pretty good dom, too. go figure.)

"Lessons from the Bottom" .... cheap...


--
AJ - http://clitin.com
(the biggest clit in pornetry)

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:49:41 PM1/23/06
to

"Renay" wrote:
>
> I so fucken own you.

You think?

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:53:01 PM1/23/06
to

"Barbara's Cat" wrote:
>
> Have you taken the comparison down yet?

No, I have it:

j r sherman

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:36:53 PM1/23/06
to
In article <b5df8$43d56162$18d62363$24...@KNOLOGY.NET>, Will Dockery says...

>
>
>"Renay" wrote:
>>
>> obviously I can draw well
>> enough to make folks with no artistic experience
>> or education think it's photographic.
>
>It'll be interesting to actually see the photograph...

you got your ass kicked, didn't you, stinky? it's so sad.


--
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Astral projection isn't just a theory ."

A. Real Dope
------------------------------------------------------------------

j r sherman

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:35:13 PM1/23/06
to
In article <z4OdndUlReL...@comcast.com>, Renay says...

>
>
>"j r sherman" <jr...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:dr3f1...@drn.newsguy.com...
>> In article <-dydnYChL-t...@comcast.com>, Renay says...
>>>
>>>> Not that fond of Dale Earnhardt, or drawings swiped from a photo of him
>>>> [by
>>>> whichever method], taken by an apparently unknown photographer, though.
>>>
>>>of course you're not. I'll bet you're completely disinterested!
>>>
>>>this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.
>>>
>>>Renay
>>
>> hey, someone let me know, is dockery actually trying to defend that
>> wretched
>> piece of shit drawing of his???
>>
>> he's kidding, right? he thinks that sad-ass-eagle-shit drawing of his is
>> worth
>> looking at???
>>
>> now THAT'S scary!!!
>>
>> love and kisses,
>>
>> j r sherman
>
>
>you know how bored I get when I'm drawing
>the same thing over and over! yesterday was
>worse than usual. I was a baaaaaaaad girrrrrl
>while you were gone.

yeah, you can be bad on occasion, but your plan on highjacking a Southern
Pacific train and going on a 1500 mile joyride with all your friends was a
brilliant one.

>speaking of, what did you bring me?

if the Czech Princess ticks me off, someone to clean your house.

heh... good thing she doesn't read the newsgroups, huh? heh...

> uh, I mean,
>
>how are you and what's the news?

if the Czech Princess ticks me off, someone to clean your house.

as you know, but others don't, i was in Europe for a while visiting the Czech
Princesses parents, who found me to be most charming (as all people do), and
happy to support their 19 year old daughter in her ever continuing "education."

how come no one told me that 19 year olds are...."tiring?"

oh, and sorry, Pete Ross, i didn't get a chance to visit fair England, perhaps
next time.

>no, really, that's what I meant!

>you were missed.

but i have graciously returned, for i am the alpha and the omega man.

>*smooch*

smoochies back.

>Renay
>
>p.s. tell D. it's a strictly platonic, welcome home
>on-the-cheek. *smooch* there's one for her, too

she can cook too... so if she ticks me off... ya know.

>p.p.s. you may or may not be a member of the
>cabal. Rob is in charge of the list but he's not
>putting out for me. (gosh, did that sound the
>way I think it did?) ;)

Rob doesn't put out for anyone (sigh)! well, i should be part of the Kabul!!!!

i am the Alpha and Omega Man.

love and kisses,

j r sherman


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 7:01:28 PM1/23/06
to

Barbara's Cat wrote:
>
> Have you taken the comparison down yet?

No, I have it:

--

Barbara's Cat

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 7:08:57 PM1/23/06
to
Stupid Smegma Will Dockery stuttered:

> "Barbara's Cat" wrote:
>
> > Have you taken the comparison down yet?
>
> No, I have it:

I wasn't asking you, Crybaby.

> --
> "Handmade Pudding" by No-Balls Dockery:
> http://tinyurl.com/a2n7q
>
> "Pussy Willy Whine" by No-Balls Dockery:
> http://tinyurl.com/e4y9t

--
Cm~

j r sherman

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:50:00 PM1/23/06
to
In article <-8qdnfpDsof...@comcast.com>, Renay says...

make sure you get him to clean your house!

HAH!

j r sherman

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 6:48:49 PM1/23/06
to
In article <slrndtan6...@nntp.petitmorte.net>, Peter J Ross says...

>
>On 23 Jan 2006 12:41:34 -0800, j r sherman <jr...@earthlink.net> wrote
>in rec.arts.poems:
>
>> In article <-dydnYChL-t...@comcast.com>, Renay says...
>>>
>>>> Not that fond of Dale Earnhardt, or drawings swiped from a photo of him
>>>> [by
>>>> whichever method], taken by an apparently unknown photographer, though.
>>>
>>>of course you're not. I'll bet you're completely disinterested!
>>>
>>>this will be proven by the next 400+ post you make about it.
>>>
>>>Renay
>>
>> hey, someone let me know, is dockery actually trying to defend that wretched
>> piece of shit drawing of his???
>
>Yes, in much the same way as he's tried to defend all his unspeakable
>shit.

with delusional hilarity, that is certain!

>> he's kidding, right?
>
>Surely you can't have been away long enough to have forgotten that
>Dockery has no sense of humour?

i know, it was one of those questions said in astonishment... ya know... like
"he can't believe that dribbling piece of shit is poetry, can he?" of course i
know he believes it is, but it still astonishes me sometimes...

that drawing was laughably wretched.

>> he thinks that sad-ass-eagle-shit drawing of his is worth
>> looking at???
>
>I've been looking at it for several minutes, trying to work out what
>the white thing on the right with the black edging is meant to be. It
>looks more like a fat penguin than anything else.

i used to draw images better than that on my peachies (sort of like a paper
folder we had here in the States) when i was in the fourth grade.

>Also, the woman looks like a zombie to me, but perhaps she'd merely
>been present at one of Will's karaoke sessions.

numbness would be required at the dockery-karaoke-of-the-delusional sessions, no
doubt.


>> now THAT'S scary!!!
>
>In a hilarious way.

exactly.

>> love and kisses,
>>
>> j r sherman
>
>Welcome back. I suppose I have to give up the comfortable chair now.

not at all. but the Czech Princess has like 40, unmarried,
all-under-the-age-of-25 female cousins!!! we'll talk. my people will call your
people, etc.

>PJR :-)
>--
>Have you been touched ___ ___ Hammer of Thor, Jan 2006
>by His noodly / _ \ / _ \
>appendage? ( (_) )( (_) ) Pierre Salinger Memorial
> \_ _/ \_ _/ Hook, Line & Sinker, Dec
>STOP GLOBAL __ _.-\\----//--._ 2003 & May 2005
>WARMING _ / _\___.-'/ _| / _\ /\/\`-._.-.__ _
>NOW, (_\_)| \___ ||_ ((_ //\/\\ _.-._ \-' ) AHM Wittiest
>JIM LAD! \__) __) | _| _) ) || || (_ \_.-' Troll of the
> /_-. || \_/ || .-'-.\ Year, 2003
>http:// _._// / .--._______.-'\ \ \\__._ 2004 & 2005
>www. /_._/ \ \ )) \__._)
>venganza (/ _.-') ( `-._ wsd 42 ~ mhm 34x8
>.org/ (_.-' :F_P: `--._) smeeter 30 ~ mwpl 12

COOL! i have heard of these people!!!

EVERYONE should go to this website: www.venganza.org

be good,

love and kisses,

j r sherman


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 7:18:00 PM1/23/06
to

Barbara's Cat wrote:
>
> Yeah, I know, you just whined that in another post.

Google loses posts sometimes.

Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 8:29:54 PM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:95f1$43d56b90$18d62363$3...@KNOLOGY.NET...

>
> "Renay" wrote:
>>
>> I so fucken own you.
>
> You think?

constantly.

you should try it sometime.


Renay


Renay

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 8:37:16 PM1/23/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138059896.0...@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

>
> Barbara's Cat wrote:
>>
>> Have you taken the comparison down yet?
>
> No, I have it:

was he asking you? no. he was not asking you, Buttinski!

yeah, Cat, it's down. had to.
's the next scene in my drama.

tune in tomorrow for the continuing stooooooory of
Kick the Drunk While He's Down

Renay

yay! I'm SO glad Jim is back!


It is loading more messages.
0 new messages