This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from
real people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence
even as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.
Meanwhile I just point to what Carroll says:
And the reply:
Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
"one incident" of his outrageous behavior.
Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by
him because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter
He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow
through, but he gives away his game with this comment:
...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
feel guilty for blowing the whistle
He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not
speak of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done
so. He tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.
To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by
his harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment,
but then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who
made him rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself
In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right
there. His words. No need to dig back.
After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While
he currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted
I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his
worldview... he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!
Automate Google Groups https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Petruzzellis$20or$20Carroll
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot