Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Peter Tatchell - a total fool

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Special Care

unread,
May 26, 2012, 6:23:58 AM5/26/12
to
It was the worst thing he ever did, to get himself contaminated by
Gill Langley's FAKE DEBATE for the sake of his greater glory.
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/2d869c3519f27b51?&q=GILL+LANGLEY

Pilotiin

unread,
May 26, 2012, 9:41:21 AM5/26/12
to
Special Care <special...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1a8e2c15-05ce-4bf0...@b26g2000vbt.googlegroups.com:

> It was the worst thing he ever did,

I think he has ADD/Narcolepsy: heard Peter Tatchell complain about events
causing him to have strange dreams.

Special Care

unread,
Jun 6, 2012, 6:45:56 AM6/6/12
to
I'd like to introduce you to an ancient earth custom.

It's called spanking.

There was no such thing as ADD / ADHD when naughty little girls got a
good hard spanking on their bare bottoms when they were naughty.

Pilotiin

unread,
Jun 11, 2012, 9:20:36 AM6/11/12
to
Special Care <special...@gmail.com> wrote in news:b92df072-ad6a-4cee-
a4a7-867...@k5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com:

> There was no such thing as ADD / ADHD when naughty
> little girls got a good hard spanking on their bare
> bottoms when they were naughty.

Drivel.

The Todal

unread,
Jun 11, 2012, 10:11:51 AM6/11/12
to
Now you're spoiling his fun. Clearly he has a spanking fetish. I think
people on the continent assume that spanking is particularly popular
with the English.


Pilotiin

unread,
Jun 11, 2012, 3:54:08 PM6/11/12
to
The Todal <deadm...@beeb.net> wrote in
news:a3mcl7...@mid.individual.net:

> Now you're spoiling his fun.
> Clearly he has a spanking fetish.

You're probably right. Peter Tatchell has complained of vivid dreams, and
he seemed over enthusiastic when drawing attention to gays in the Church of
England clergy, which would suggest Narcolepsy.

> I think people on the continent assume that spanking
> is particularly popular with the English.

They would not be entirely wrong. The British are reputed to be mean to
their children, and they do say, "little children should be seen and not
heard."

Or did you mean spanking as a leisure activity? ;)

Special Care

unread,
Jul 4, 2012, 10:34:45 AM7/4/12
to
Well, apart from spanking as a leisure activity between adults and an
informal conjugal therapy to 'blow off steam' and release repressed
emotions among consenting adults.....................

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If we want to be serious about this ADD / ADHD thing for a few
minutes..........

The Children Act, UK, circa 1981(?), reversed roles between children
and adults. Prior to that legislation, adults had the legal right to
beat and humiliate children with impunity. Since that act was passed,
children have the legal right to beat and humiliate adults with
impunity.

As the years passed and the extreme stupidity of the Children Act
produced increasingly horrific consequences, the 'authorities' would
not admit their mistake and repeal the Children Act. So they
medicalised the problem, calling it ADD / ADHD, so that no one could
be blamed, but it was just a disease to be treated by the priests of
modern medicine. So that lets us all off the hook. No one is to blame
and there's nothing you can do when kids terrorise you in your home or
overturn the display in a shop........the little angels are just
suffering from ADHD, so that's all right then..........

[Apart from the Children Act, poor nutrition and vivisection-based
poisons, particularly vaccines, contribute to the violent and erratic
behaviour of children, including teen suicides.]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And that is where SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) comes from too.

The relentless rise in infant mortality over the past half century
obviously is caused by the Vivisection Swindle, babies being
increasingly poisoned by animal tested (=UNTESTED) poisons,
particularly vaccines.
To avoid admitting that modern medicine is a scam and is destroying
our health and murdering our babies, and to keep the money rolling in,
the priests of modern medicine invented that idiotic name: sudden
infant death syndrome.

Giving something a name does not explain it and does not get us
anywhere.

It reminds me of the little boy who asked his father:
'Daddy, why can we see through glass.'
The wise old man replied:
'Because it's transparent.'

It's the same with ADD / ADHD / SIDS.

Giving a new name to a problem achieves nothing, except increasing the
profits of the Vivisection Syndicate.
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/4169b9bc2718f854?hl=en

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The same applies to AIDS.
AIDS does not exist, except as a new name for something which has
always existed.
It was a 'new' disease invented by the Vivisection Syndicate when they
saw their opportunity to make more money, when the gay community in
San Francisco in USA - most of them drug addicts - started dying in
large numbers. Their immune systems were damaged by assorted poisons,
lack of sunshine, poor nutrition....
There is nothing new there. In that sense, AIDS does not exist, but it
was an opportunity for the Vivisection Syndicate to make vast profits
by inventing a 'new' disease which 'needs medicating.'

The reality is that the medicines kill the so-called 'AIDS sufferers'
prematurely. They might recover if they refused the poisonous but
profitable drugs and changed their lifestyle and avoided all other
poisons.

But there's no use in explaining that to Peter Tatchell, judging by
his admiration for the fake antivivisectionist Gill Langley.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Animal Experimentation: the Hidden Cause of Environmental Pollution
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_174g5kg85dn
0 new messages