Just before he died, Hans Ruesch send me copies of his main healing
publications - “Slaughter of the Innocent,” “Naked Empress,” Bulletins
1 and 2 and other material.
He knew I had given away all my earlier copies.
Hans was dying, and he knew what he was doing when he sent those
documents to me.
He knew I have the courage of a man who has nothing left to lose,
because I see the world as it actually IS, and I see human beings as
they actually ARE, which means I have lost everything of value
already.
===========================================
SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENT
(originally titled “Imperatrice Nuda”)
by Hans Ruesch
===========================================
page 329:
People who have suffered, and yet have no pity, evidence a worrisome
callousness of the intellectual and human faculties. Among the
survivors of the Nazi concentration camps there were some former
vivisectors, who - including a woman - went straight back into the
laboratories as soon as they were liberated…………
===========================================
page 342:
………..Some time ago an Italian schoolteacher in Tunis wrote to tell me,
“Your articles against vivisection are very disturbing to me and other
people like me. When we think we have at last succeeded in blotting
out all thought of vivisection, there you go reminding us, and we
suffer again. Why don’t you forget about it, and let us live in peace?
How can you ever hope to defeat the three strongest forces in the
world - human stupidity, cruelty and greed?
===========================================
page 333:
……… If something is morally wrong, no amount of legislation can make
it right. The abolitionists further contend that abolition would
immediately cause medical science to progress, obliging it to abandon
the wrong road, and to concentrate on the more dependable alternative
methods of research, and especially the far more effective preventive
medicine, which harms nobody, not even the citizens’ pocketbook - but
is therefore financially unrewarding.
Vivisection is responsible for other sufferings than the ones directly
inflicted upon the uncounted animals and human victims of an erroneous
medical science. It is also responsible for the very real, drawn-out
sufferings of all those who can’t shut out of their minds the thought
of the continuous tortures deliberately inflicted. Only vivisectors
and animal haters will shrug or laugh off these utterances.
“This daily crime, which keeps us awake at night,” wrote Dino Buzzati,
the Italian author. And the thought of it was so unbearable to Richard
Wagner that he felt it influenced his entire creative work. In one of
his three essays on vivisection he wrote: “The thought of their
sufferings penetrates with horror and dismay into my soul, and in the
sympathy evoked I recognise the strongest impulse of my moral being;
and also the probable source of all my art. The total abolition of the
horror we fight against must be our real aim. The vivisectors must be
frightened, thoroughly frightened, into seeing the people rise up
against them with stocks and cudgels. Difficulties and costs must not
discourage us.”
I was reminded of Wagner the day a very beautiful young woman from
France, a schoolteacher, came to see me in Rome just to ask me for a
word of hope; my assurance that I believed the horrors would really be
stopped someday. At the moment of leave-taking, this young woman, who
could have had the world at her feet, suddenly burst into tears and
said in despair: “This thing just takes all the joy out of living.”
===========================================
“A SPECIES THAT WOULD SEEK TO SAVE ITSELF BY SUCH MEANS IS NOT WORTH
SAVING.”
[end of quotations from “Imperatrice Nuda”]
===========================================
“WE ARE NOT GOING TO ABOLISH VIVISECTION.
VIVISECTION IS GOING TO ABOLISH US.”
(-Tom, 1987)
===========================================
===========================================
OTHER THOUGHTS:
This morning I had another quick look at the “Terminator” videos. The
first in the series is the more serious and more impressive. The
scenes of post-civilisation are nightmarish beyond words.
But looking at the Sarah Connor complex, my mind kept wandering back
to “Imperatrice Nuda” and those words quoted by Hans Ruesch:
“A SPECIES THAT WOULD SEEK TO SAVE ITSELF BY SUCH MEANS [=vivisection
of all other species] IS NOT WORTH SAVING.”
I saw that with full clarity in 1990, when even Hans Ruesch remained
silent about the Citizens Arrest proposal. Even Hans Ruesch was
possessed by humanity’s collective death wish, collective self-
destruct compulsion.
So even Hans Ruesch balked and pulled back from the one hope we had of
stemming the avalanche of “animal tested” (=UNTESTED) poisons that is
about to destroy us. We signed our collective death warrant in 1990
when we ignored the citizens arrest initiative. It’s been downhill all
along since then, and we are well past the point of no return now.
In other words, IT’S ALL OVER NOW BAR THE DYING.
(Incidentally, the senior politicians are well aware of what is
coming. This explains the all-party support for the new legislation in
England - in October 2010 - which makes it a crime to “offend” anyone
else in the slightest. The aim is to intimidate us, to soften us up
for the coming end-time dictatorship, by conditioning us to be afraid
to open our mouths to speak at all in case we commit the terrible
crime of “offending” anyone ! Senior politicians everywhere are
terrified of ending up like Mussolini or Ceaucescu in the soon-coming
end-time chaos. That is the explanation behind these otherwise
ridiculous “laws.”)
This in turn connects with the revelations of “Mankind in Amnesia” by
Immanuel Velikovsky.
The analysis is so simple, one wonders initially why you refuse to see
it and to act accordingly by commencing the recovery process, recovery
from our collective mental illness. And again, that recovery process
is simplicity itself - just a case of facing the realities of life
that we have been trained to deny and ignore !
But then we can make the next connection, as articulated most notably
by Freud, Velikovsky and Malcolm Godwin (quoting approximately here
from memory):
“We are chronically caught inside a set of programmes which prevent us
from both understanding the nature of our predicament and from doing
anything to remedy it. Humanity suffers from a set of collective
delusions which are deaf to logical criticism.”
Next, the root of our madness is easy to find. It’s all there in the
geological record. Humanity is trapped on a planet whose surface is
being destroyed every few thousand years by a force over which we have
no control.
(University courses in ‘geology’ are compartmentalised - for the
purpose of denying this most basic fact of life on earth.)
Our compulsion to destroy the earth by our own efforts, via our never-
ending avalanche of “animal tested” (=UNTESTED) poisons, is another
feature of our COLLECTIVE MENTAL ILLNESS.
The vivisection swindle is perhaps the most alarming symptom of our
collective mental illness, because it illustrates the infinity of
human stupidity - showing that human beings can be brainwashed by
ruling groups to believe literally ANYTHING, no matter how absurd,
such as the idea that vivisecting animals (or humans for that matter)
could ever benefit anyone.
Which fittingly brings us back, in circular motion, to pages 9-11 of
IMPERATRICE NUDA:
“…….There are enough such instances to fill a book - all proving that
it would be difficult to find a more absurd and less scientific method
of medical research…………. So the claim that through animals we can
learn to control human diseases could seem a sign of madness if we
didn’t know that it is just a pretext for carrying on “experiments”
which, however dangerously misleading for medical science, are either
intimately satisfying for those who execute them, or highly
lucrative.”
So Sarah Connor should not have bothered.
Humanity is not worth fighting for.
And the fact that human beings are unable to intuitively and
intellectually grasp the following two fundamental principles only
confirms the depth of hopelessness in the diagnosis of collective
mental illness and collective death wish:
(1) “A SPECIES THAT WOULD SEEK TO SAVE ITSELF BY SUCH MEANS
(=vivisection of all other species) IS NOT WORTH SAVING.”
(2) “WE ARE NOT GOING TO ABOLISH VIVISECTION.
VIVISECTION IS GOING TO ABOLISH US.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Animal Experimentation: the Hidden Cause of Environmental Pollution
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_174g5kg85dn
The Only Sane Response to the Vivisection Swindle (1990):
http://www.nzavs.org.nz/mobilise/27/12.html
===========================================
---------------------------------------------------------
page 5:
Though the majority of practising physicians defend vivisection, most
of them don’t know what they are defending, having never set foot in a
vivisection laboratory. Conversely, the great majority of vivisectors
have never spent five minutes at a sick man’s bedside, for the good
reason that most of them decide to dedicate themselves to laboratory
animals when they fail that most important medical examination, the
one that would allow them to practice medicine. And many more take up
“research” because that requires no formal studying. Any dunce can cut
up live animals and report what he sees………………………
…………….Today we no longer torture in the name of the Lord, but in the
name of a new, despotic divinity - a so-called Medical Science which,
although amply demonstrated to be false, successfully uses through its
priests and ministers the tactics of terrorism:
“If you don’t give us plenty of money and a free hand with animals,
you and your children will die of cancer”
- well knowing that modern man does not fear God, but fears Cancer,
and has never been told that most cancers, and maybe all, are
fabricated through incompetence in the vivisection laboratories……..”
---------------------------------------------------------
Animal Experimentation: the Hidden Cause of Environmental Pollution
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_174g5kg85dn
The Only Sane Response to the Vivisection Swindle (1990):
http://www.nzavs.org.nz/mobilise/27/12.html
===========================================
---------------------------------------------------------
IMPERATRICE NUDA - continued
Showing that this book is timeless, classic, and will never be
superseded
-------------------------------------------------
Page 191:
“That microbes [germs, viruses] associated with a malady may abound in
the environment and be present in the human body without giving rise
to symptoms is by now a well-known fact…… Many organisms which are
considered to be causal are frequently to be found in healthy persons.
The organisms of enteric fever, of cholera and of diphtheria may be
cited as examples of this.”
Page 192:
“The bubonic plague that caused millions of deaths during the Middle
Ages disappeared without any vaccination. Leprosy disappeared from
Europe without any specific therapy. The Swiss medical historian
Ackerknecht puts it this way: “Leprosy, a rare disease in antiquity,
started spreading conspicuously in the 6th century, reached a
terrifying peak in the 13th century, then vanished mysteriously from
Europe.” ……..All this tends to prove that the great diseases of
mankind have a life cycle of their own - they spring into being, grow
and decline, all without any discernible reason. As usual, man deludes
himself that he is the protagonist on earth; but Nature is…….
……..In 1931, an article in the Paris daily, ‘Le Matin,’ reported:
‘Once more the census proves that France’s decreasing population is
not due to any decline in births but to increased death rate… The
increasing death rate is greatest among infants, the very class that
is being subjected to wholesale ‘protective’ vaccination.’”
[End of quotes from “Imperatrice Nuda” / “Slaughter of the Innocent”
by Hans Ruesch.]
-------------------------------------------------
“Modern Medicine is not a science but a religion.”
-Dr Robert Mendelsohn.
-------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
Regarding the increasing death rate among infants, ‘Le Matin’ only
implied obliquely in 1931 that this might not be *in spite of* but
BECAUSE OF blanket vaccination of infants.
In later decades, as the death rate among infants could no longer be
ignored, the priests of modern medicine had to invent a label, SIDS
(Sudden Infant Death Syndrome), a fancy way of saying we “don’t
know” (?) why so many infants are dying, but we have to pretend it’s
not because of mass vaccination.
Similarly, we have to pretend that the AIDS epidemics in parts of
Africa, which history shows to have occurred consistently in the wake
of the mass vaccination programmes……………. were caused by expressions of
love and not by mass vaccination.
-------------------------------------------------
Returning to IMPERATRICE NUDA,
page 200:
“The systematic torture of sentient beings, whatever the pretext and
in whatever form, can’t achieve anything more than it already has: to
show us what is the lowest point of debasement man can reach.”
-------------------------------------------------
IMPERATRICE NUDA - continued
continuing to show that this book is timeless, classic, and will never
be superseded
-------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
The section of IMPERATRICE NUDA titled “The Evidence” makes grim
reading, and bewildering too, especially on account of the obvious
pointlessness of all animal experiments.
The religious status of medical ‘science’ guarantees a bottomless well
of funding from the taxpayer with no realistic scrutiny.
A vast *non-job creation scheme* .
How do you tell a priest he’s wrong, when the new fake religion of
‘science’ is universal?
Still, to keep the money flowing, the priests have to look busy. Hence
the bewildering pointlessness and uselessness of the ‘experiments,’ of
which the following is only a mild example.
-------------------------------------------------
from IMPERATRICE NUDA, page 133:
“At the Department of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, an
experiment was done to see whether taking vaginal smears from rats
tended to make their subsequent behaviour more venturesome or less
venturesome, i.e. whether it affected their “exploratory behaviour.”
The experimenter divided 24 female albino rats into 3 groups. One
group of 8 had vaginal smears taken and were then laid on their backs
while the experimenter stimulated their vagina with a glass rod.
Another group received the same treatment, except that the rectum
instead of the vagina was stimulated. The third group were stroked by
the experimenter on their bellies, instead of having rods inserted in
them. Four animals from each group were stimulated as described
immediately before each trial in the enclosure, and four immediately
after. The enclosure had Perspex sides and roof, the floor was marked
out in squares. The number of squares entered by the rat during a two-
minute period was recorded, and was intended to be a measure of the
rat’s degree of venturesomeness.
The rats were placed in the enclosure and watched once a day for two
hours a day, for a period of 16 days. In conclusion, the experimenter
said that vaginal smear taking had “no effect on the exploratory
behaviour of the rats in this study,” even though the E.E.C.s (brain
activity recording tests) on the animals “were abnormal for a
time” (“Animal Behaviour, Vol. 16, 1968, pp. 534-537).
What about the experimenter’s own brain activity? Somebody overlooked
the possibility of an interesting test there.”
[End of extract from IMPERATRICE NUDA.]
-------------------------------------------------
COMMENT, continued:
IMPERATRICE NUDA by Hans Ruesch is a timeless classic.
It was epoch making, the most influential book of its kind.
One effect of its appearance in 1976 was that the vivisectors learned
the need for greater secrecy.
[Note: if vivisection is such a noble and proud vocation, why conceal
it from public view?
If this is beauty and nobility and glory, then why are vivisection
laboratories not made of glass and with loudspeakers broadcasting the
sounds from within?
Or, with modern technology, why not a live internet feed to every
experiment funded by our money, so that we can all observe this noble
work at first hand?]
If you criticise the book as ‘dated,’ on account of the information in
it being pre-1975, you overlook the fact that this is an interactive
process. It is precisely because Hans Ruesch exposed the vivisectors
as ridiculous that you are unlikely to find in recent decades such
frank descriptions of so obviously stupid and pointless ‘experiments.’
IMPERATRICE NUDA - continued
continuing to show that this book is timeless, classic, and will
never
be superseded
-------------------------------------------------
Page 345:
“Most of today’s scientists contend that moral considerations are not
pertinent; that pity is not the yardstick by which human progress
should be measured. But then what should be the yardstick of human
progress? Violence?”
IMPERATRICE NUDA lives !
-------------------------------------------------------------------
page 431:
“…..insane experiments on the sexual life of cats performed at the
Museum of Natural History in New York were brought to a halt by a long-
lasting wave of public protest…….. even though similar experiments
were going on simultaneously in about thirty other “seats of
learning.”
……..as “Principal Investigator” on the applications was named one
Lester B. Aronson, Ph.D……. year after year - for fourteen years - he
had applied for funds to purchase batches of three-month old kittens
and of adult male cats. According to his own written statements, he
intended to perform on them a series of mutilations, which included
the “enucleation of both orbits” (removing the eyes), the surgical
destruction of the sense of hearing and of smell, lesioning the brain,
castration, and more exercises, allegedly designed to discover how all
this would affect the sex life of the victims. Apparently for
variety’s sake he also did some “terminal” (i.e. until death occurs)
experiments in which the penis nerve was exposed and then submitted to
electric shocks until “termination.”
Statements in Aronson’s application also contained references to the
necessity of a “sound-retarded” testing room and of specially built
“transfer cages” for handling “violent animals.”
In spite of these clear indications of almost unimaginable tortures to
be uselessly inflicted upon innocent and highly sensitive creatures,
Aronson and his assistant, Madeline L. Cooper, had no problem getting
their projects funded every year, to the tune of almost half a million
dollars all told………..
………in a long, highly ambiguous essay in “Science” (8 October 1976) …..
one Nicolas Wade wrote:
“The allegations by the animal rights groups that the experimenters
took a sadistic pleasure in the experiments is an obvious absurdity.
Aronson says that surgery was conducted under anesthesia, as is
customary.”
Wade did not try to explain what was the purpose of the “sound-
retarded” testing rooms, or the necessity for the “transfer cages”
specially built for handling “violent animals.”
………………….On 3 May, 1978, I [Hans Ruesch] faced the Pope of American
Vivisection, Dr Clarence Dennis, well known surgeon and vivisector……..
in a debate arranged by the Sherrye Henry Show on New York’s WOR radio
station.
QUESTION [from Hans Ruesch]:
“Dr Dennis, will you tell us what was the purpose of the cat
experiments at New York’s Museum of Natural History?”
ANSWER [from Clarence Dennis]:
“You remember that rape is a serious problem, and you know that there
are abnormalities in sexual behaviour that play a role in developing
rape. I believe that what they were working on was to try to figure
out, working with cats which in some respects have a brain that is
comparable to the human - I know it’s not nearly as complex but in
many respects for this sort of purpose it is - and they were studying
I believe with this end in view. This is what they have been working
on for years.”
-------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPERATRICE NUDA lives !
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pages 344 - 345:
“George Bernard Shaw, Richard Wagner, Mark Twain, who were among the
many great men uncompromisingly opposed to vivisection, had
steadfastly refused to use the weapon of its uselessness.
Wrote Wagner:
“If we abolish vivisection only because we have proved its
uselessness, humanity will have gained nothing.”
And Shaw:
“If you abandon the dogmatic humanitarian attitude, if you say that
this is a question which has to be decided by the benefit the practice
confers or may confer, then you put yourself hopelessly in the wrong…
If you attempt to controvert a vivisectionist by showing that the
experiment he has performed has not led to any useful result, you
imply that if it had led to a useful result you would consider his
experiment justified. Now I am not prepared to concede that
position……….”
-------------------------------------------------------------
“A SPECIES THAT WOULD SEEK TO SAVE ITSELF BY SUCH MEANS IS NOT WORTH
SAVING.”
-------------------------------------------------------------
“……….Twain, Wagner, Shaw, and the others of their mind, like the
recently deceased John Vyvyan, were right in demanding that
vivisection should be abolished on ethical grounds only and that
humanity would lose if it were abolished because of its uselessness.
However, today not even an incurable optimist would affirm that since
Twain and Wagner’s day, or even since the much more recent time of
Shaw, humanity has become more humane.
At the end of the last century, John Ruskin resigned his seat at
Oxford University in protest at the opening of a Physiology
(vivisection) Department. And when on July 15, 1879 Lord Truro
unsuccessfully introduced in Parliament a bill for total abolition,
one of the most noted political men of the time, the Seventh Earl of
Shaftesbury, read in support of the bill a quotation from the records
of Prof. Friedrich Goltz, the vivisector from Strasbourg, who had
boasted of a particularly clumsy, revolting and long-lasting
experiment on the nervous system of a young bitch, Lord Shaftesbury
concluded his address with the comment:
============================================
“I would rather have been the dog than the professor.”
============================================
It is hard to imagine an important politician today going on record
with a similar statement.
So it might seem that if vivisection wasn’t abolished during the last
[19th] century, when it was practised by few and criticised by many,
now that it is being studiously ignored by the majority, tacitly
accepted by the politicians, and fuelled by the most lucrative
industry in the history of mankind, the outlook must be hopeless.
But meanwhile something new has come up.
Vivisection has proved far worse than merely futile; it has proved
directly responsible for damages to public health that are increasing
and proliferating in geometrical progression and can no longer be
buried…………….”
[End of extract from IMPERATRICE NUDA.]
-------------------------------------------------------------
======================================
COMMENT:
Unfortunately it’s not as simple as that.
Hans Ruesch undoubtedly was one of those men of whom we can say he
possessed the quality of greatness.
He was a great man.
Hans Ruesch was one of the several unrecognised geniuses who generated
important countercurrents to the increasingly INVERTED civilisation of
the twentieth century, alongside Wilhelm Reich, Immanuel Velikovsky,
Paul Brunton and a few others.
I salute Hans Ruesch as a man who made a vital contribution to the
healing of our tragic INVERTED civilisation.
But he was a “single issue” campaigner. He did not place the
vivisection swindle in its overall context as part of the whole and
interconnected to all the other parts.
The vivisection swindle is one of the major symptoms of the COLLECTIVE
MENTAL ILLNESS afflicting all six billion human beings, a mental
illness rooted in the fact that the surface of the earth is being
destroyed every few thousand years by a force over which we have no
control.
Among other things, the vivisection swindle shows that human beings
can be trained to believe literally ANYTHING, no matter how absurd.
In other words, human beings do not possess rational minds but are
merely programmable automatons.
You all demonstrate that fact of human psychology every time you chant
the mantra - the BIG LIE - that the ruling group trained you to
chant:
“I don’t want animals to suffer but vivisection is necessary for
scientific and medical progress.”
And never mind the fact that even a brief examination of the medical
literature shows that any progress in medical science took place not
because of animal experimentation but in spite of it, usually by
accident. Animal experiments always retarded medical progress.
Vivisection exists ONLY because there is no money in health, but there
is money to be made from a permanently SICK population.
Not only that. “Animal tests” - meaning non-tests - far from being
“safety tests,” are actually a *licence to poison* and are in effect
the collective suicide / biocide of the human species and the means to
the destruction of the surface of the planet.
ALL human beings - there is NO exception, that means YOU too - ALL
human beings of our generation are very severely mentally ill and are
quite determined to bequeath to our grandchildren only poisoned
bodies, a wrecked biosphere and a barren, depopulated earth, mainly
via these fake “animal tests” [=non-tests] which generate all these
poisons.
So vivisection / animal “testing” indicates a collective death wish in
the human species. This in turn is easily explained by basic
psychology, viewed in the context of the geological record - the
“unconscious” compulsion to repeat our past, meaning to recreate by
our own efforts the periodic destruction and depopulation of the
surface of earth every few thousand years as shown in the geological
record, which is another of the TEN FORBIDDEN SUBJECTS.
Just get on with it then, you six billion human imbeciles.
But I wish to register my protest again in a public place:
YOU SIX BILLION USELESS SUICIDAL BUMS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DRAG ME DOWN
WITH YOU.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
page 267:
“THE CAGE
Being by nature a conformist, besides an imitative and gregarious
animal, man tends to pattern his inner habits no less than his outer
appearance on the rest of the crowd. That’s understandable: it makes
him feel safe. Less easy to explain, in view of his unshakeable
conviction that he possesses a rational mind, is his persistence in
refusing to recognise an error even when it has been proved to him.
And when he has at last acknowledged an error, likely as not he will
replace it with a new error, often more serious than the preceding
one. That’s what caused Roscommon to say, “the majority is always in
the wrong.” So the majority has blandly replaced Galenism with
Bernardism. And man’s errors are almost all, and maybe all, due to his
reasoning, rather than to his intuition or instinct.
According to Aristotle, whose thoughts were long considered the
topmost achievement of human intelligence, a heavy stone must fall
faster than a lighter one. More than the error in itself, what
surprises us today is that it never occurred to Aristotle nor to
anyone else for many centuries after him to find out whether it was
true. Why? Because the range of human thought has always been limited
by a cage, conforming to the period.
In the course of time, slowly, the cage moves - not necessarily ahead,
but move it does - with the pushes and shocks it receives from some
rebellious individualist inside, and so covers some partly new ground;
but the way of thinking remains confined within the bars of the cage,
from which it cannot evade…….
…………………While rapidly extending the borders of human knowledge, the
Cartesian technique of thinking, spurning all intuition and
philosophical thought, substituted a new, macroscopic error for all
the preceding ones; an error which contained from the inception the
seed of future defeat, because it led the scientist unawaredly away
from the truth of life, and thus away from scientific ideals.
By denying the importance, and even the very existence, of anything
that cannot be weighed or measured, they divorced themselves from
reality.
So the idea of roasting in an oven live animals in order “to discover
the secret of fever” could be conceived only by a caged mind, one
rigidly limited by a mechanist conception of life and health, like
Claude Bernard’s. The founder of today’s vivisectionist method thus
demonstrated that he was unable to distinguish between cause and
effect - had failed to understand that the raised temperature of a
diseased individual was the consequence, not the origin, of a malady.
In the same way modern medicine presumes to cure diseases by masking
their symptoms - which very often, as in the case of fever, ARE
NATURE’S WAY TO RE-ESTABLISH HEALTH.”
[End of extract from IMPERATRICE NUDA.]
=======================================
COMMENT:
The emphasis on the last few words above was mine:
“………symptoms - which very often, as in the case of fever, ARE NATURE’S
WAY TO RE-ESTABLISH HEALTH.”
What modern medicine obsessively regards as symptoms that must be
attacked and eradicated are usually just that - the organism’s natural
healing activity which we should welcome and facilitate.
Intelligent leaving alone, intelligent doing nothing, is often the
correct approach to what we call disease.
It’s often been lamented with amazement that our illustrious
“scientists” have been ‘unable to conquer the common cold.’
Again this illustrates one of the basic fallacies, a major blind spot
of the medicine men.
What kind of a fool would want to ‘conquer the common cold?’
When you sneeze, you usually expel rubbish out of your body through
your nose.
When you cough, you often expel rubbish out of your body through your
mouth (unless you’re stupid enough to politely swallow it back in
again!).
And the raised temperature (fever)?
Well, any schoolboy can tell you that raising the temperature nearly
always speeds a chemical process. When the body’s temperature is
raised by fever, the healing mechanisms that have swung into action to
throw out the body’s accumulated poisons can proceed more efficiently.
The other obvious benefit of fever is the further elimination of
poisons in the sweat; hence the exceptionally unpleasant smell of a
fevered person’s sweat, which is something to be welcomed.
And yet the medicine men say we must prevent the ejection of poisons
through the nose and mouth and skin, thus keeping the poisons in the
body, while lowering the temperature to what they call normal - thus
“curing” the common cold, which actually means sabotaging the body’s
cleansing, healing activities!
So it takes a real prize idiot to lament that we have ‘still failed to
conquer the common cold.’
Which means nearly every doctor and nearly every scientist is a prize
idiot.
It’s best to say that in direct language, if we are ever to heal.
This is an INVERTED civilisation.
And always the explanations are simplicity itself.
Just the basics of human psychology.
Humanity is a backward, unevolved species. We are still stuck in the
primitive psychological error of a compulsion to blindly imitate and
repeat any activity we associate with physical survival, however much
such activities wreck our chances of happiness and rule out elementary
decency in human behaviour.
-------------------------------------------------------------
(See the Oxana Malaya video again to fix that in your mind. Oxana’s
behaviour is just an extreme case of what is basic to the human
condition. Instead of seeing Oxana as a freak show, see her as one of
the most valuable Teachers of our time.)
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the major survivalist emergency of about eleven thousand years ago
(shown in the geological record), the lapse into inter-tribal war for
scarce resources was not necessary. But our ancestors lacked the
maturity to deal with a survivalist emergency in a rational, caring,
sharing manner.
And simply because we survived, our brains and archetypes absorbed the
‘imprint’ of physical survival being associated with permanent inter-
tribal war and all that goes with it.
And one of the first rules of winning wars is that your leaders must
be the most mentally ill men the tribe has been able to produce, and
you must blindly believe and follow the most mentally ill men of your
tribe. Otherwise your tribe will be wiped out by competing tribes with
leaders who are more mentally ill than your leaders are.
-------------------------------------------------------------
(General Sherman of American Civil War fame was one of the few
military men to frankly admit that he had to go insane to win the war.
Lincoln understood him well, and reluctantly left him to it.)
-------------------------------------------------------------
We never came out of survivalist mode after the vegetation grew back
eleven thousand years ago.
So to this day, believing and following the most severely mentally ill
men of your nation FEELS RIGHT, because our brains and archetypes have
long associated that behaviour with physical survival.
That is why it FEELS RIGHT when we perpetually elect politicians who
lie and break their promises and sabotage our country.
That is why it FEELS RIGHT to elevate to the position of ‘scientists’
men who are so ignorant that they say we need to ‘conquer the common
cold.’
(Fix it firmly in your mind: the common cold is obviously one of the
body’s periodic healing mechanisms for throwing out accumulated
poisons, something to be welcomed.)
It couldn’t be simpler. Collective Mental Illness - accompanied by the
delusion that we are not mentally ill - long ago became associated
with physical survival in our brains and archetypes. That is why our
Collective Mental Illness is self-perpetuating.
And that is the simple psychological explanation of “The Cage” Hans
Ruesch was referring to in IMPERATRICE NUDA.
-------------------------------------------------------------
If you see this clearly, you will next ask what is the way out of this
condition we’re in.
Almost no doctor or politician will help with this, because the truth
reveals doctors and politicians to be largely superfluous and
redundant.
So just spread the truth.
It will be a long, slow process of reorientation/re-education among
adults, as one by one we regain our mental health and refuse to pass
on the old errors and delusions to the next generation.
Gradually it became clear to us that human beings want to be lied to,
because being lied to is associated in our brains and our archetypes
with physical survival, in a primitive, infantile sense, on account of
humanity being a backward, unevolved species condemned to blindly
imitate and repeat whatever they experienced and survived in the
primitive past of the species and also in the infancy of the
individual.
The Vaccination Fraud is the collective suicide of the human species.
Opposition to it has always been tentative and deliberately
ineffective.
We are a mentally ill species with a collective death wish.
Even Hans Ruesch remained silent on the Citizens Arrest proposal of
1990.
And now Dr Mercola seeks to step into Dr Robert Mendelsohn's shoes in
the internet age.
He seems a very honest man.
So much so that I'm surprised that Dr Mercola has not been 'bumped
off' yet, as Dr Robert Mendelsohn was.
(It's a taboo subject - the manner of Dr Robert Mendelsohn's death.)
The following is an example of the ongoing DELIBERATELY INEFFECTIVE
"opposition" to the collective mass suicide / genocide / biocide of a
mentally ill species via the Vaccination Fraud and the Vivisection
Swindle.
As usual, there is no mention of the Citizens Arrest option, which is
the only way to neutralise the mass murdering vaccine peddlers:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/11/06/nvic-state-advocacy-portal.aspx
HUMANITY'S COLLECTIVE DEATH WISH
and our DELIBERATELY INEFFECTIVE "opposition" to it:
=============================
“The horrifying truth, so long as it remains unrecognised, is a
powerful force urging us toward our doom.
“If the human race is not made able to face its past, the traumatic
experience that caused cultural amnesia will demand repetition.”
(From "Mankind in Amnesia" by Immanuel Velikovsky.)
====================================
And you can see that happening all around you at an accelerating rate.
Make the connection between the Vaccination Fraud and Velikovsky's
statements above.
We have this inner compulsion to recreate and relive the forgotten
survivalist emergencies in which all human behaviour is rooted.
The Vivisection Swindle and The Vaccination Fraud guarantee the
destruction and depopulation of the surface of the earth.
You all are determined to bequeath to your children and grandchildren
poisoned bodies and a wrecked biosphere.
https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATLJ93aHtMlYZGRkcDZidDRfODI5enB0OGZmZA&hl=en_GB
IMPERATRICE NUDA continued
page 294:
“Surgeon Stephen Smith contributed this testimony to the second ‘Royal
Commission Report:’ ”
‘The first time I saw a brutal experiment on an unanesthetised animal
I wished to leave the room, I was sickened by it. The next time I was
less affected, and with every experiment I was less affected, and
eventually I was able to look on at the most terrible things without
my emotions being moved in any way… I submit that what occurred in my
own case probably occurs to everybody…’
The progressive blunting of human feelings, which occurs inescapably
in all those who engage in systematic torture, is an extremely serious
matter. As vivisection is being practised on an increasing scale and
in ever more countries in the Third World’s new republics, medical
teachers trained in the West nowadays show off their “scientific”
prowess by repeating before their gaping pupils the experiments of
Claude Bernard and company - there is a constant, worldwide increase
of the number of individuals who get conditioned to disregard the
sufferings of other sentient beings, and to perpetrate inconceivable
cruelties as if they were commendable acts.
Since this attitude has been allowed to spread from the physiology
classes to all the other fields of medicine, the scientific torture
has now come to loom large even in psychology teaching. A growing
percentage of psychologists and psychiatrists are made to witness or
participate in experiments in which all sort of animals are being
driven to insanity through every physical or psychological torture
that diseased human minds are able to devise…….
…..The callousness of present day medical scientists manifests itself
also in the way they express themselves.…………
Prof. Peter Hays writes:
“The screening of new substances by means of animal tests is at
present rather primitive in spite of the elegance of the experiments
themselves.”
Clearly, for today’s medical scientists the term “elegance” must have
a different meaning than for common mortals.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
page 297:
“The physiologist is not a man of this world, he is a scientist, a man
caught and absorbed by a scientific idea that he pursues; he no longer
hears the cries of the animals, no longer sees the flowing blood, he
sees only his idea; organisms which hide from him problems that he
wants to discover. He doesn’t feel that he is in a horrible carnage.
Under the influence of a scientific idea, he pursues with delight a
nervous filament inside stinking and livid flesh that for any other
person would be an object of disgust and horror…”
So wrote Claude Bernard in his classic ‘Introduction’, and English
writer John Vyvyan surmised that if the high priest of modern
vivisection had lived in our Freudian days he would not have published
those lines, for they afford a textbook example of one of the gravest
mental diseases known to psychiatry, of which Claude Bernard
represented a typical case, and of which probably no vivisector is
entirely free: paranoid schizophrenia.
As a mental patient Claude Bernard had plenty of company among
vivisectors. So his famous Russian disciple, Elia de Cyon, wrote in
‘Methodik der Vivisectionen’ that “the vivisector must approach
vivisection with a sense of joyous excitement.”
----------------------------------------------------------------
Now it shouldn’t be very hard for anyone to find the exact definition
of the “sense of joyous excitement” with which that Russian
physiologist used to approach, knife in hand, his trembling victims,
securely strapped down in the Czermak table……….”
---------------------------------------------------------------
page 299:
“Even when they were not familiar with Freud, most of the people I saw
reading a list of experiments couldn’t help exclaiming sooner or
later:
‘But these people are crazy!’
One said: ‘The main impression one gets is stupidity.’
In the language of psychiatrists, the term “craziness” does not exist,
nor does “stupidity.” But in the vocabulary of common mortals they do.
And whatever term one wants to use, it is clear that the major number
of vivisectors are mentally deeply deranged people.
According to Austrian philosopher Johannes Ude,
“the vivisector is a morally underdeveloped individual with
pathological tendencies.”
page 305:
Schizophrenia is the most frequent, but hardly the only mental illness
that afflicts vivisectors. Claude Bernard, in his terminal years,
suffered in addition from manic depression…….
A colleague of his, Prof. Blanchard, having become blind, kept seeing
they eyes of the cats he had tortured staring at him from out of the
dark, until he went out of his mind, and on his deathbed kept raving
and imploring his family to remove all those eyes that surrounded him.
And Flourens, Claude Bernard’s successor, roamed during the final
years of his life at night time the Jardin des Plantes in Paris,
howling and barking like the dogs in his laboratory.”
[End of extracts from IMPERATRICE NUDA by Hans Ruesch.]
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
In the 1980s I genuinely believed - in my naivety - that that book
IMPERATRICE NUDA would change everything, that we were going to turn
things around, that we were going to stem the flow of “animal
tested” [=UNTESTED] poisons, and reverse the human decline into self
destruction under this DELUGE of “animal tested” [=UNTESTED] poisons
which is now about to destroy us all completely and murder our
children and our grandchildren.
The surface of the earth will soon be poisoned and depopulated as a
direct result of your deluge of “animal tested” [=UNTESTED] poisons.
But it has to be denied.
History shows that the citizens of DECAYING, DYING civilisations have
always been hopeful and optimistic.
But back in the 1980s, I naively imagined that Hans Ruesch’s books
were so brilliant and so conclusive that they couldn’t fail. I really
did believe back then that we were going to turn it around and reverse
the flow of “animal tested” [=UNTESTED] poisons that will soon destroy
and depopulate the surface of our earth, bequeathing to our children
and grandchildren only POISONED BODIES and A WRECKED BIOSPHERE.
I really believed in the 1980s that when we brought that book
IMPERATRICE NUDA to everyone’s attention, the earth would be saved
from the avalanche of “animal tested” [=UNTESTED] poisons.
It was not to be.
As the months passed in the late 1980s, disillusionment set in.
The slogan introduced by Tom in 1987 is apt:
==========================================
WE ARE NOT GOING TO ABOLISH VIVISECTION
VIVISECTION IS GOING TO ABOLISH US
==========================================
[Do you notice that there is something about Tom that makes people -
even Tom himself - deny his existence? After he left Yorkshire in the
1980s, his trusted colleague promptly consigned all his paper files to
the rubbish dump in Leeds, to try to obliterate all traces of that
man’s existence. Who was Tom?]
And then, the deafening silence that greeted the *Citizens Arrest
Initiative* in 1990, when even Hans Ruesch remained silent about it,
confirmed humanity’s collective DEATH WISH.
==========================================
==========================================
===========================================
At that time I had not yet understood that my species is mentally ill.
And I see now that humanity is not just a little bit mentally ill.
HUMANITY IS VERY SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL.
==========================================
IMPERATRICE NUDA continued:
===============================
page 325:
“Konrad Lorentz………cited… a particularly cruel and senseless experiment
done by his two “assistants,” W. and M. Schleidt, who surgically
“destroyed” the sense of hearing in turkey hens, to “study” how that
would affect their behaviour toward their newly hatched chicks.
“The deafened turkey mothers immediately hacked their newborn to
death,” Konrad related…. adding that this unmotherly behaviour must
not be necessarily ascribed to their inability to hear the chirps of
their young, for the surgical injury might have affected the mother
instinct in other, unknown ways.
Not for a moment did it occur to the Nobel Prize psychologist that the
turkey hens may have preferred to see their chicks dead rather than
helplessly exposed to the whims of man, just as the baboon mothers
prefer to decapitate their children rather than surrender them to the
laboratory workers.”