According to an anonymous voice on the radio, Jan 6 will not go as
quickly as our discussion described. It seems acc. to him that they go
through the state ballots, probably in alphabetical order, and when
there is an objection by one Rep. and one Senator, they pause right away
for 2 hours of debate in each house, then come back and resume going
through the states. So they won't have for 6 states 12 hours of debate
in a row, or even broken into 2 or 3 parts. It would be 6 parts plus an
hour after each one to get back to the joint session. I see no more
than 3 objections per day, probably only 2 handled.
I think it unlikely, but I'm still hoping one Republican will speak up,
call all this a lie from a president who lies all the time, etc. There
are rules of decorum in Congress that prevent them from saying negative
things about each other, and if there weren't discussion would
degenerate to be like here and worse. I don't know if they apply to
criticizing the president personally, and I don't' know what they do if
someone's ignoring them. Are they able to shut him up, fine him,
censure him? At least I'd like to see someone speak for a minute and
refer to his webpage, facebook page, wherever he's placed a long
criticism. But I know i"m dreaming.
The new session of Congress begins today at noon ET. Carried live by
C-Span**
Sen Grassley has complained about the Sunday session, maybe the first in
history. The Constitution says it's to begin on Jan. 3 unless the
previous Congress sets a different date, and they usually or always have
when it came out on a Sunday.
Grassley complained even though he knows the reason, which he did not
address, did not even mention.
And that is that the previous congress expired last night and, I think
it was explained by Pedro on C-Span that the Republican Senators, I
think he said, would not promise that trump would not make recess
appointments while Congress was out of session. Grassley knew this.
I don't see how the Republican Senators matter. No matter what they
promised, trump would ignore it and make appointments which iiuc are
good for two years, without senate confirmation needed. So if the
Senate is not needed, how can they promise anything. "The Constitution
states that “[t]he President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies
that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions
which shall expire at the End of their next Session” (Article II, §2,
clause 3)." End of the NEXT session, not the current one.
So if it was the Republicans in the Senate who would not promise, or if
it was the WH that Pedro said would not promise, that's even more reason
to figure that's what trump would do. He's already in the last couple
weeks taken political appointees and claimed to make them civil service
appointees that one or nore NPR reporters seem to think cannot be fired
(except for cause). I find that hard to believe, that they can't be
dedesignated from the civil service as easily as they were designated.
**When Congress or committees are in session, C-Span carries it live.
They have a channel for the House and one for the Senate and a 3rd one,
but may play committee hearings. It is usually sooooo boring, and even
when something interesting is the topic, it is sooooo slow that again it
become sooooo boring.
And from 7 or 8 until 10 every morning they have call-in, where they
rotate, Dem, Rep, Independent. I liked this at first. Maybe that was
before crackpots discovered it, or maybe it was bad but I hadn't gotten
sick of it yet. Now almost half of those who call in are really idiots,
so I can't recommend it.
What is really good is Saturday night,often early but I don't remember
details. Starting at 10 or 11, they have Book TV, even on C-Span radio,
where they show interviews with non-fiction authors, usually on politics
or biography, excellent stuff, and that lasts until maybe 6 or 7am
Sunday. You really don't need TV for most of this, radio is fine, at
https://www.c-span.org/networks/?channel=radio