Aratzio, in <
news:ua11v79dcddngt0hj...@4ax.com> did
thusly write:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 07:31:44 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
> Ah, so your failure is somehow my fault. That you can't follow a
> thread like every other person on USENET. Maybe the *configuration* is
> just another excuse to cover for that IQ of yours?
So let's get this straight, everyone elses' posts show up just fine,
*except* for yours... and the fault *doesn't* lie with you?
And when you're told of the problem, it 'magically' rectifies
itself... and the fault *doesn't* lie with you?
And when you stub your toe, you blame someone else, too, right?
> But I doubt it, I'm sticking with you are a gutless little crybaby.
>
> Tee Hee *configuration*, what a fuckin n00b.
You're the commonality between the two posts not showing up correctly,
checked on two major NSPs. The fuckup is yours, or your NSP's.
Since it fixed itself pretty quickly after you were informed of the
problem, I'm sticking with you are a gutless little crybaby with an
inability to own up to their errors.
>>Yeah, yer a fucking *genius*, you can't even get yer posts to properly
>>propagate to the major NSPs!
>
> So why were you the only one. Cockbrain & Fred had no problem. Only
> one person had a problem, cupcake. I can assure you doing fault
> analysis the single point is causation.
That single point is you, retard. That post was picked up in the
Flonk, not in AUK. It didn't show up in AUK, on two different NSPs.
And, of course, pointing yet again at the single point of failure
(that'd be you, short bus), as soon as you were notified of the
problem, it was 'fixed'... but *not* by you, right? The magical usenet
fairies who watch over all servers and all posts were the ones who
'magically' fixed your post propagation errors, right?
I can assure you, in doing fault analysis, the single point is
causation.
OMG, ANOTHER fucking IKYABWAI!!! Except it's not, it's merely me
pointing out your rampant projection. That finger yer pointing is
pointing at a mirror, slowwit.
>>I am sure that if you just keep telling yourself that it wasn't the
>>fact your nuts sucked right up inside once you read that you've fucked
>>up not once but twice, that some day in the distant future, you might
>>actually get to see them again... if you lose 150 pounds, doughboy.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking IKYABWAI.
Really, ANOTHER stale, tired, overused craptastic failure line from
decades ago.
>>>>You should be overjoyed, now you get to froth more, Frothy. Oh, look...
>>>>here's some more of your froth now...
>>>
>>> Given that your bloviation about froth has never once worked on any
>>> person regardless of stature on USENET, what does it say about you
>>> that you continue to use it? Just sayin' most people once they figure
>>> out people are laughing at them for performing like a lame ignorant
>>> retard that they figure out the things that make them look like lame
>>> ignorant retards. You're not. So I'll let you figure the rest of that
>>> out.
>>
>>Nice meltdown. Doesn't mean a damn thing, though, does it? Your word
>>soup has never once worked on any person regardless of stature on
>>usenet. You're just an old, fat, stupid toothless grandpa dealing with
>>"mechanical typing issues" because of a stroke, and using the same
>>old, tired, overused lames again and again.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking IKYABWAI.
Really, ANOTHER stale, tired, overused craptastic failure line from
decades ago.
>>You should really look into retiring, your time on this planet is
>>short, and your wasting it here looking like a fucking retard probably
>>isn't the best use of your limited time.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking repeat DELUSION.
Sombody hit him upside the head... his old phonograph-technology brain
is skipping in the groove.
>>> Free hint: Things like confusing mechanical typing skill with
>>> intelligence. That was really fucking stupid. Then mewling *froth
>>> froth froth* after getting spanked.
>>>
>>> But you go ahead, you keep standing by your classic stupid. Obviously
>>> you are a master of the classics.
>>
>>Nice froth, Frothy.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking avoidance LAME.
Really, ANOTHER stale, tired, overused craptastic failure line from
decades ago.
>><snicker>
<snicker>
Watch those snickers once they get to cascading... they'll leap right
out and snag you.
>>>>> So, two days it took you to find two letters. One whole letter a day.
>>>>> You must be so proud with your *improvemt* in reading skills that you
>>>>> got it down to 2 days. Working out that whole spell checking process
>>>>> must be difficult for someone with your skill and intelligence. I do
>>>>> hear they have vocational programs that can augment your limited
>>>>> skills. It is that rote teaching set where you learn by repetition but
>>>>> don't understand anything about the why.
>>>>
>>>>Your entire basis for argument is the length of time for my reply, because
>>>>it either didn't make it to my server, or I accidentally mistook it for more
>>>>of your retarded spam, and deleted it? Really?
>>>
>>> "I DIDN't SEE IT"
>>> But you responded to every other post in every other thread. It was
>>> just that one really painful one that if you just ignore it will go
>>> away and you can just get on with your life and hope that someday the
>>> pain just goes away.
>>
>>No, I didn't see it. If I had, I would have responded to it, just as
>>I'm kicking your ass now. But you've still not explained the *second*
>>post that only showed up in the Flonk, not in AUK, and only because
>>Aratzio replied to you and kept all of what you'd written in his
>>reply.
>
> *STOMP* SO THERE!
> I guess you told me.
I guess I did. I guess you admit your mistake? No? Why am I not
surprised?
> Funny how Cockbrain found it and you didn't. That
> must make him either braver or brighter that you. So, now we know
> Cockbrain is one or both. Wow, that must suck for you.
Two separate NSPs didn't have the post. Perhaps they were delayed in
propagating, perhaps they were dropped because you're a foul-mouthed
lamer. Either way, those posts I only saw because Aratzio replied to
them.
>>Care to expound upon your latest fuckup? Or will you bloviate some
>>more to cover up your latest fuckup with word soup, as you're trying
>>to do with this one?
>
> That word "fuckup" I do not think it means what you think it means.
I think it means "Aratzio" and everything Aratzio does, which is the
textbook definition of the word "fuckup".
>>>>Weak.
>>>
>>> Yes, cupcake, you are left making excuses for why you ran like the
>>> gutless coward you are. Just go ahead and beg for me to stop and if
>>> you are good, fuck off like the good little tard you are, I might let
>>> you have some semblance of dignity as you lick your balls in retreat.
>>
>>Please to be explaining your second post that didn't show up in AUK,
>>but DID show up as a reply by Aratzio, in the Flonk. Something is
>>wrong with the configuration, you drooling, dribbling retarded fucking
>>kook.
>
> It showed up, I can see it on two servers, Fred saw it, Cockbrain saw
> it. Only YOU are whining about how you were either blind or stupid.
Or perhaps I use different servers than you, and the propagation went
awry. Whatever, I'm here now, and kicking your ass.
I notice that I'm seeing your posts *now*... fixed your
misconfiguration, did you?
>>It must be something on your end, since you're frothing so *very* hard
>>to try to cover it over with a text wall of froth.
>>
>
> By claiming that other people saw and responded to a post you claim
> didn't show up.
>
> Feel fee to point out how that works, cupcake.
>
> You do seem quite defensive that you have to resort to such illucid
> logic.
The illucidity is squarely on you. Your posts are now showing up
*after* you were informed that they were not, I didn't change
anything, therefore you must have changed something on your end.
> Only one person failed to see the post, cupcake. Just one and now he
> is whining that "ITS NOT MY FAULT!!!!".
You, as usual, were the single point of failure. Failure being the
operative word.
> How about we just stick with the more likely and obvious, you have no
> balls and until your were forced to respond, you cowered.
How about we just stick with the more likely and obvious, that there
was a propagation error that you fixed after being informed of your
fuckup.
>>> Other than that, well, so far I am quite enjoying our little
>>> conversations. Watching you spin and make ever more fantastical
>>> excuses, responding with socks in hopes that it all just stops.
>>>
>>> "It's like a nightmare, it just keeps getting worse"
>>
>>No, this is fun. I could do this for years and years and years. In
>>fact, I could do this for the next fifty years easily. Can you say the
>>same?
>
> Umm, cupcake, I have been doing this for years. Really, you are quite
> stupid to imagine you are the first foamy little kook with an
> iferiorty complex the size of Texas I've nut kicked for weeks on end.
> It is possibly my most endearing attribute.
Only weeks? You'll have to do much better than that, lightweight. And
I call you lightweight only on your flaming ability. Were we talking
about your rotundity, you'd definitely fall into the heavyweight
category. Actually, the morbidly obese category.
>>Do please ramp it up a bit, though. Seems you're falling behind.
>
> Nope, Octanews died yesterday. Using much slower backup server.
Sure, *that's* your reason for getting your ass kicked to within an
inch of your life, even to the extent that you're snipping wholesale
giant chunks out of posts so you can cowardly avoid having to reply to
them.
How about we just stick with the more likely and obvious, you have no
balls and until you are forced to respond, you will cower.
>><snicker>
<snicker>
>>>>> Really, you make this shit far too fucking easy.
>>>>
>>>>Really, you make this shit far too fucking easy.
>>>
>>> I'll bet you spent hours and hours copying that character by
>>> character. I'll bet that in two maybe three weeks you will be able to
>>> write that without the help of someone writing for you to copy.
>>>
>>> It's like first grade and you are practicing learning those block
>>> letters A a B b C c D d...
>>
>>Sez the retard who's fucked up two posts so far, then text-walled in a
>>futile attempt to cover it up.
>
> So, now you have two posts to which you couldn't nut up and respond.
<facepalm> I did respond to them. Are you retarded? Seriously.
<sigh>
Please to be detailing where, as you claim, I did *not* respond to
those two posts, one of which is the post I'm replying to right now.
And I'll be watching and waiting for you to backpedal, turn and run
from replying to this, you halfwitted drooling slackjawed jabbering
monkey.
>><snicker>
>>
>>>>>>>>>That you
>>>>>>>>>were completely incapable if discerning for yourself the missing
>>>>>>>>>letter and had to ask?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You do know what irony means, right, cupcake?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Please go on in a verbose manner about this supposed 'irony' you speak of,
>>>>>>Frothy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>><snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> <twirls>
>>>>> How many did you find?
>>>>> I'd advise going back to the dentists office and get to practicing
>>>>> with those "Highlights" magazines that had taught you everything you
>>>>> know.
>>>>
>>>>Avoidance noted. And yet you somehow managed to froth while saying nothing,
>>>>Frothy.
>>>
>>> Well, should we discuss your complete and gutless avoidance of each
>>> and every detailed fact as you spin and excuse your way through the
>>> fact that in 11 (or 12) words you got each and every detail wrong?
>>>
>>> Mechanical vs Intelligence?
>>> Inability to communicate?
>>> bastardization of incredible common Shakespearean quote?
>>
>>Picking nits in an incredibly transparent attempt at appearing not to
>>have fucked up two posts?
>
> OH DEER GAWD
> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
> Who was it started his own personal ass kicking by whining about a
> typo.
>
> You really have zero self awreness.
Says the kook who's just snipped 80% of a post and only responded to
one tiny point, so he could cowardly avoid having his ass repeatedly
kicked on the rest of it, only to have his ass repeatedly kicked on
the one point he singled out for replying to.
> So, do explain, how did other people read the posts?
Different servers. It worked for them, it didn't work for the people
using my NSPs. Obviously, you've fixed your fuckup after being
notified that you'd fucked up.
> Cmon you can
> explain how that works, how just one person, only one couldn't read
> the post and that it isn't his fault.
Cmon, you can explain how that works, how just one person fucks up his
posts so they don't propagate properly, and when told about it, fixes
his fuckup, and that it *isn't* his fault.
OMG, ANOTHER fucking IKYABWAI!!!!!!!!!!
No, just another instance of me pointing out your rampant
psychological projection.
>>> You seem to have forgotten to address those very specific points,
>>> cupcake.
>>
>>You seem to be running away from addressing my points, poundcake. I
>>call you that because you're a fatass, fatass.
>
> Well, we shoudl start at the beginning and your hilariously stupid
> response, you know the parts you never addressed. You really need to
> have some good will banked before you demand answers to your pathetic
> mewlings
Says the guy who just snipped about 80% of a post so he could cowardly
avoid having to answer any of it. Leaving that post intact and
replying with your usual pathetic mewlings would likely have been
better, in hindsight, eh?
Oh, wait, you tried that, too. And got your ass repeatedly kicked.
<snicker>
> How about we just start with a Petard? Have you figure it out yet?
A petard is, in the traditional etymology of the word, a small bomb.
It has come into modern useage in the phrase "hoisted with one's own
petard" to mean someone who's fallen into their own trap.
You laid a ground trap, camouflaged it, then proceeded to yank the
cover off the trap and dive head-first into it with abandon.
Any more questions, or will you be figuring out how to use Google
today?
>><snicker>
>>
>>>>SPNAK!
>>>
>>> Now you are just trying much too hard. You really should learn what is
>>> the definition before you gulleyize yourself into complete
>>> insignificance.
>>
>>Sez the guy who's spewed epic text-wall in a blatant attempt at
>>covering over his fuckup of two posts, and his utter cowardice in
>>answering any points I've brought up.
>
> "IF I KEEP REPEATING MYSELF I'LL BELIEVE ME TOO!"
Lamerisms won't help you now, old fat retard. Nothing will. You'll be
required to continue screeding thousand-line posts from now until I
decide you've had enough.
You're *my* kook now, Frothy.
>>>>Watch those SPNAKs and <snicker>'s, then tend to cascade pretty quickly once
>>>>they get started.
>>>>
>>>><snicker>
>>>
>>> See above, patting yourself on the back for utter failure is far from
>>> decorous. Generally when unoriginal lamers like yourself pat them
>>> selves too hard, it makes a mess. IYKWIMAITYD
>>
>>See above, you see to be patting yourself on the back all the time...
>
> No, that would just be the easy part of pointing and laughing at you.
Sez the retard screeding text-walls as we all point and laugh.
>>oh, but when I called you fat, you got all defensive... "NO, I'M NOT
>>GAY! WHY WOULD YOU SAY SUCH A THING?!"... when it was all about you
>>being fat. So we learned something about you tonight... a secret that
>>you'd perhaps wanted kept better hidden.
>
> WooHoo!!! It is the delusion that keeps on giving. Where did you read
> that? I bet you can't post the mid for anything that even gets close.
> I'll bet you actually think that was written, will dig back through
> and then find it doesn't exist but will be able to make up a new
> delusion where the old delusion is confirmed.
Where did I read that? In the post where, in your reply, you snipped
out about 80% of the post, so you could cowardly avoid replying to it.
That same post that you then tried to reply to in full, only to get
your ass kicked soundly on each and every point.
>>How ever do you reach around to pat yourself on the back, being as
>>elephantine as you are?
>
> Really, SAME fucking Delusion?
Really, SAME fucking old school, tired, worn out, overused lamerisms?
>><snicker>
<snicker>
Oh oh... cascading snickers. Not looking good for you, grandpa. You
got the next couple years free to do this each and every day, ad
infinitum? You'll need it.
> Lets us Repeat:
> On a tertiary note, it is "hoist with his own petard". Anyone with at
> least 10th grade education would have been able to understand your
> misuse of the phrase. Give it a shot, look up the definition of
> petard" and see how that works with your usage, dimwit.
Asked, answered, and your ass has already been blistered. You'll
notice it when you sit down after you've finished your kooky dancing.
> Even if you had used it properly it would have been hoist not
> "hoisted", you ignorant lackwit.
I see you cannot comprehend tense. Not a surpise. I was not surprised.
Oh... sorry, according to you, it should be "I was not surprise."
Oh, but later in this very post, you'll use "hoisted"... so you're not
only an auto-froth screeding texwaller, and a rampant psychological
projectionist, you're also the world's biggest fucking hypocrite.
> See, tyou never addressed that. You know one of the things that made
> you shrivel and run away. Of course your hilarious claim that a post
> everyone else saw and you avoided was my fault, not yours.
Of course, you've not addressed that fact that, after your being
informed of your fuckup, your posts suddenly started showing up like
they should.
How about we just stick with the more likely and obvious, you have no
balls and until you are forced to respond, you will cower.
OMG! Another fucking IKYABWAI!!! Except it's not... it's yet another
instance of me pointing out your rampant psychological projection.
Fetch, boy.
>>>>>>>>>Please do feel free to bring more of your *A* game, I find you
>>>>>>>>>pathetic, boring and quite possibly the easiest target in AUK. Given
>>>>>>>>>that I have not been playing with your tards in a while I could use
>>>>>>>>>some light batting practice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Like I said, so much stupid in just 11 words. So how you feeling now,
>>>>>>>>>honeybunch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm feeling like I made you melt down, Frothy. I win.
>>>>>
>>>>> Translation:
>>>>> "Took a beating, nuts gone, nothing left in tank, declare victory"
>>>>
>>>>Translation:
>>>>"You frothed. I win."
>>>
>>> Really, your reading skills are that bad or you are just that
>>> delusional?
>>>
>>> So, cupcake, what is a "petard"? Go ahead, explain how you used the
>>> word "petard" or "hoisted". I am sure that someone that could only
>>> detect two missing letters from a mechanical typo would be able to
>>> explain how his hilariously stupid use of an incredibly common quote
>>> can be explained.
>>>
>>> Right?
>>>
>
> " <insert life affirming kook lame here>"
>>
>>Wow, getting you to froth is ever so easy. You're going to be one of
>>my best kooks.
>
> And he is trainable.
Says the frothy kook who's built a screeding text wall. You don't look
so good when you try *not* to text-wall, kooky. Best you go back to
what you do best, auto-frothing, psychological projection and being a
huge hypocrite.
>>>>> That you are incapable of writing anything approaching any minimal
>>>>> level of cogent would cause most people not to attempt the feat of
>>>>> pissing in their own corn flakes. You on the other hand are proud that
>>>>> not only do you get a bit of piss in your corn flakes, you also get it
>>>>> on the table and your chair. With that accomplished you can then sit
>>>>> down to your favorite meal. Of course it still doesn't have that
>>>>> homemade *mommy* flavor for which you were striving.
>>>>
>>>>I'm feeling like I made you melt down moar, Frothy. I win again.
>>>
>>> I feel that comeback lacks that certain level of originality. I am
>>> sure I might just possibly have read that hundreds maybe thousands of
>>> times before when some poor halfwit is making the guppy face after
>>> taking another in a long line of textual nut kickings defaults to
>>> *maxstupid*.
>>>
>>> But you stay with your *program* I am sure one of your socks will be
>>> along shortly to demonstrate just how much they support you. It isn't
>>> like real people would, so you are forgiven in advance. Not that I
>>> won't laugh at them too.
>>
>>While you're wearing out your hands and joints typing, I'll be wearing
>>out my voicebox laughing out loud at your frothy text-walls, kook.
>
> Ah, so when you were whining about the mechanical ability to type you
> didn't see that as a problem. Funny how now that fact you are left
> completely dumbfounded all you have left is you Ziplock Bag-o-lames.
And you're pulling your age-old lames and tired, weak flames out of
your ass, where you store them, along with a 1962 Buick Skylark and
the complete episodes of the original Lassy on Beta.
> That is, when you are not hilariously claiming that because only one
> person claims to have failed to read a posting it is the posters
> fault.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Your posts, after your being informed of
your fuckup, started showing up. Therefore, the only conclusion to be
reached is that you fixed your fuckup, and are screeding non-stop to
try to text-wall over your fuckup so as not to get laughed at as much.
How's that working out for you, Spanky?
> Dude, that one is almost as hilarious as your Petard use.
Yeah, but not half as hilarious as you snipping out the majority of a
post so you could cowardly avoid having to answer. Coward.
>>>>>><snicker>
>>>><snicker>
<snicker>
>>>>Uh-oh. The snickers are starting to cascade... that's the death knell for
>>>>you, Frothy.
>>>
>>> I have a question, if in this little tete-a-tete your repetitive lames
>>> end up having no effect upon the number of times you get kicked in the
>>> nuts, will you continue with the same lames as your personal Maginot
>>> Line?
>>
>>I have a question, if in this little head-to-head your text-walling
>>kook screed and denials of being gay when the topic of discussion was
>>how fat you were end up getting you repeatedly kicked in the gonads,
>>will you hold your personal Maginot Line, or will you do a French fold
>>and run for the hills?
>
> So, the ability to communicate and describe with a certain level of
> detail the factual effects of your pathetic mewlings is in some way a
> detriment, to you.
So, a French fold and run for the hills it is, then. Will that be any
time soon, or do you want to do this same routine for a few decades?
I've got time. Let me know.
> In otherwords you read at about a 3rd grade level and the words make
> your head hurt from that one letter at a time, mouthing each part and
> you need me to write at your ignorant level.
Great little fanfic. Proof positive of your ownership.
> Denied, kook.
There's that French fold and run for the hills! Say, Arfatzio, I
though you were Italian, not French? You could teach the French a
thing or two about cowardice.
>>> The Way of The Kook does describe those actions.
>>
>>Indeed, it also aptly describes your actions, kook. You should know,
>>you know so much first-hand about being a kook, you wrote the book.
>
> Ah, so every doctor, scientist or engineer that wrote a book based
> upon their own observations was performing those observations. Really,
> you are quite stupid, uneducated and have the wit of cement.
Nice strawman argument, but the fact that you're trying to extend your
own little kooky life to every other person in the world just shows
that you're throwing chaff at an unprecedented rate. It's not working,
of course.
> Your ability to make yourself look less intelligent grows with each
> day. That you just keep doubling down on the same failed responses
Your inability to make yourself look less intelligent grows with each
day. You're very near the bottom of the curve as it is.
> "Always practice your mistakes, you may getthem right"
He says, while fucking up the quote, mechanically.
<snicker>
Keep chanting your mantra... you might actually succeed at flaming
someone one of these days, and getting it right.
>>And now, with your kooky text-wall screedings, you're writing it
>>again.
>
> I doubt your reading ever makes much sense.
And *that* make worlds of sense. Drunk, stupid, or having a mild
stroke, grandpa?
>><snicker>
<snicker>
>>>>>>>> <spikes ball>
>>>>>>>> And that kids is how you make a lamer fold like a cheap suit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just how folded are you, Cheap Suit? Crisp edges? Or a few rumples?
>>>>>>
>>>>>><snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> "I Know you are but what am I?"
>>>>> Wow, devastating and so very original, PeeWee.
>>>>
>>>>Sooo... crisp and neatly folded edges it is.
>>>>
>>>><snicker>
>>>
>>> So, you feel that someone accurately pointing out that you were
>>> incredibly derivative is in some way a win for you?
>>
>>Being derivative isn't necessarily a bad thing. For instance, you are
>>deriving all your lames from the same tired routines you've used again
>>and again ad nauseum for decades. You're the definition of one-trick
>>pony.
>
> So, your belief is if you copy those that failed before you, you will
> be able to win.
Doesn't seem to be working for you, does it? Perhaps you should take a
lesson from your decades-long experience in failure, and find a new
line of work. Or at least a new line of screed.
>>If you can't bullshit us with your pseudo-brilliance, you'll baffle us
>>with your psychobabble, and if that fails, you'll bury us in screed.
>
> Feel free to explain how one is pseudo-brilliant. I am quite sure that
> someone like myself could write in a stupid manner, copying you would
> be a start. However, there is not a fucking way in the world that a
> gormless lackwit like yourself is capable of ever appearing in any
> manner way or form intelligent. No matter how many times you copy what
> I write, the patina of intelligence will never gloss your writings.
That falls under the 'bullshit us with your pseudo-brilliance'
category.
> The evidence is your pathetic mewls about how hard it is for you to
> read. While I have no problem laughing at your illogic and delusions
> due to your writing at a 3rd or 4th grade technical and emotional
> level.
This falls under the 'baffle us with your psychobabble' category.
> "Ah dun laeks nun dem smard peepel"
>
> Feeling stupid when you are in fact stupid is appropriate in your
> case, cupcake.
Where's the screed? You forget to bury us in screed! Oh, no, wait.
You've been doing that all along.
Fetch, kook.
<snicker>
>>> Seriously, how
>>> does that work, if you just repeat everything and then people laugh AT
>>> you, you feel better about yourself, right?
>>
>>Oh, it's fairly certain
>
> I know, dumbass, I told you.
So you know that people are laughing at you, and yet you persist.
Kooky, that.
>> that people are laughing at *you*, Screedy >McFrothyKook.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking IKYABWAI.
Really, ANOTHER old, tired, overused lamerism you've pulled from that
Pleistocene pucker you call an anus.
>>>>> So, who spent a week working on your IKYABWAI skills? It would have to
>>>>> be a Nun, they are the only ones that could possibly have the patience
>>>>> to suffer through trying to teach you something to so utterly basic
>>>>> and incredibly lame.
>>>>
>>>>Nice froth, Frothy. Please do spew some more.
>>>
>>> Wow, another sparkling defensive move by the all-star. He reached deep
>>> into that bag-o-lames and pulled out his #1 lame.
>>>
>>> Turns out the bag-o-lame has two and its just a ziplock sandwich
>>> bag-o-lames.
>>
>>Wow, he reaches into his purse and pulls out his lipstick, applies it
>>generously, then adjusts his stockings.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking DELUSION.
Mind if I start using these phrases against you when you pull this
sort of thing? Thankyekindly.
>>Yer busted, Arfatzio... in a discussion about how fat you were, you
>>got all defensive and went off on a tangent, adamantly declaring that
>>you weren't gay.
>
> Really, as this is the first time I have typed the word "fat" here, I
> am sure being the awesome (I can't find the post WAH WAH WAH)
> Usenetizen you claim to be, can supply a mid where I do anything but
> laugh at you.
>
> <MIDS GO HERE>
>
> You won't as it is only your delusion speaking and now you will have
> to find a new delusion to cover for the old delusion.
See the other post. *Your* *own* *words*. Don't you feel stupid now
for outing yourself? Wait, you should feel stupid anyway... so, don't
you feel *especially* stupid for outing yourself?
>>You, in one fell swoop, displayed your innermost fear, you innermost
>>desire, and your deepest, darkest secret.
>
> See above, pegboi.
Pegboi? Ah, you and Fred Hall must have had some pillow talk last
night, eh? You've got a bit of fabric caught between your teeth. Is
that a pillow cover?
>>>><snicker>
>><snicker>
<snicker>
>>>>Do mind those snickers. They bite.
>>
>>Especially the cascading ones.
>>
>>> Well, that makes your imagination, febrile.
>>
>>Well, that makes your imagination, inactive.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking IKYABWAI?
> While usining the word imagination
> Irony meter borked.
Really, ANOTHER fucking lamerism that's been so overused it has no
meaning anymore? And he speaks of imagination... this is a guy who's
an auto-flame loser who learned his limp-wristed retorts and replies
decades ago, and is too stupid to learn anything new.
>><snicker>
> Really, so your definition of imagination is just using the same
> sentences ad infinitum and applying a well known pop cultural meme to
> a situation as a referential and then playing off the referential is
> unimaginative to you.
No, that's *your* definition, oldster. "Hoist with one's own petard",
indeed.
Oh, by the way, you slow-witted, fuckwitted halfwit, you got the quote
wrong, too. It's not "Hoist by his own petard", it's "Hoist with one's
own petard".
Care to explain how and why you were so stupid you couldn't get it
right, yet you deigned to lecture others on how right you were, Mr.
Fucking Hypocrite?
Care to explain why you also, later in this very post, use "hoisted",
Mr. When I Do It, It's OK.
<snicker>
> I think I see where you are going, Timmie and Lassie can't help there
> either.
Zero points for originality, zero points for humor, zero points for
intelligence. You lose.
>>Originality would have been something like this:
>>"Wow, more, you didn't just go back to the well, you fell in, dug
>>another 150 feet down, reached an underground aquifer, then installed
>>high-pressure pumps and drained the whole damned thing dry. Good job,
>>fuckhead."
>
> Ah, so the variation of the "stop digging" trope is the height of your
> imagination. Well, I guess from what you have to work with that isn't
> unexpected.
It beats "What's that, Lassy, what'd you say?!" "Bark, bark!" "There's
someone trapped in the old well, you say, Lassy?!" "Bark!" "Gosh golly
gee willikers, we gotta help 'em!"
All you did was plagiarize a once-popular TV series that's been
long-dead, in your own special pseudo-intellectual-necrophilic way.
You fucked Lassie and Timmy, and you fucked their memory using them in
your cheap shot bullshit. You should be ashamed, and Lassie lovers
everywhere should line up to kick you square in the nuts.
I came up with something completely new and therefore completely
original.
In short, I win.
>>> I will give you points for plagiarizing from wikipedia. That does show
>>> that you can copy and paste pop culture referentials that go right
>>> over your head into google.
>>
>>So now referencing an online reference is plagiarism? So either you're
>>a kook making a kooky assertion, or your use of Lassie is plagiarism,
>>too. Please to be detailing which of those is it, hey.
>
> Well, yes, your use is. Since you didn't reference it in your
> repsonse. And now you admit you copy and pasted it directly,
> unreferenced use is by definition plagiarism, fucktube.
Failure to answer the question noted, kooky. And I admitted nothing.
Your fanfic delusional rantings are wholly manufactured.
Ok, your use of the Lassie reference was also plagiarism, since you
failed to reference it in your response, Mr. I'm A Fucking Hypocrite.
> However, using a pop culture reference is not plagiarism as the only
> thing used was a well and names.
And a reference to a show that you failed to provide reference for,
plagiarist.
> Seriously, every little thing just goes right on by your pointy little
> head.
Says Mr. I'm A Fucking Hypocrite Who's Psychologically Projecting My
Retardation and Failures Onto Others, But I'm Too Stupid To Figure Out
Why.
> Now whine about wall of text because you were so stupid it had to be
> explained, as usual.
You just love frothing, is all.
Well, go on, froth more, kooky. Lots more. In fact, I think I'll have
you froth like this for the next few years, each and every day. For
every day you miss, you'll be called a sniveling coward (and I'll be
keeping count), and for every day you do post, you'll be called an
auto-froth textwalling wingnut.
How's that sound to you, Frothy?
>>> Just think if you were actually the audience for whom I write rather
>>> than just the object and subject of my derision.
>>
>>Sez the guy who's textwalling at never-before-seen rates, ranking 11
>>on a 1 to 10 scale of kookiness.
>
> So, it disappointed you to find out that youe are just the target not
> the target audience. That must have hurt.
More word soup, rife with spelling errors and logical inconsistencies.
You're really *not* very good at this, are you, Frothy?
>>>>Nevermind that I look like a doddering old fool to anyone other than people
>>>>my own age, nevermind that I'm showing my age, nevermind that it's akin to
>>>>me blathering on about buggy whips and the manufacture of horse shoes.
>>>
>>> I'll bet pop culture ignores you in return.
>>
>>I was quoting and referring to you in that phrase, you retard. And
>>yes, pop culture ignores you. Because your references are so very
>>dated that you might as well be taking quotes from the fucking Amos
>>and Andy show.
>
> Who were you quoting, cupcake? Palagiarism again. You really need to
> work on your own skills rather than using other peoples work.
Well, according to the world's biggest fucking hypocrite, using a pop
culture reference is not plagiarism, as the only thing used was names.
Hell, I didn't even use a well in that reference.
Got any more things you'd like to be booted in the nuts about?
<snicker>
>>Get it, fat ass? You're old and dated, and so is your material. You
>>fucked up and showed your age, you fucked up and let slip how dated
>>your shitty material is.
>
> I see, so in your delusion, I am old, fat and gay.
No, in reality, by your own admission, you are old and fat. By your
replies and responses here, you are closeted or severely afraid of
being seen as gay.
> However, as has been proven by your own words your are:
> Stupid, unimagnative, plagiarising and delusional.
Sorry... no. Kicking your ass all over AUK is none of those things.
And since this is coming from Mr. Psychological Projection himself,
that *must* mean that *he* is "stupid, unimaginative, plagiarizing,
and delusional".
And he is. What a surprise.
> That is pretty pathetic you can't even come up with a delusion worse
> than your own real life.
Oh, please to be frothing tenfold about what your delusions are
telling you about my real life. This fanfic I've just *got* to hear.
> Just a minor point here, cupcake, if by referencing a common pop
> culture trope one time makes me old, what would it be if one were
> referencing multiple older pop culture tropes multiple times? Just
> want to see what the deluion-a-matic can come up with on that one?
Oh, you mean the Amos and Andy reference? Buggy whips? Horse shoes?
Just trying to make an oldster feel at home... old folks are alarmed
and frightened by the big, bad modern world, so we paint a picture of
cobblestone streets, horses as transportation, gaslight lamps and none
of that damnable interwebby thing!
In your case, it doesn't appear to be helping, as your delusions have
taken over, and you're auto-frothing now.
>>And you're too old and tired to update your game, you are an old fat
>>dog who can't learn new tricks.
>
> Now you are just repeating yourself. Do you feel that makes you look
> less or more delusional?
Same old, weak flamelets. Do you feel that these could burn their way
out of a paper bag, if it were necessary?
>>>>Eh... eh... ...I'm old... what was I talking about again? I just poo'd my
>>>>adult diaper! Feed me my strained peas! Where are my heart pills? Tuesdays
>>>>at the old folks home is vanilla pudding day! Let's watch Matlock.
>>>><zzzzzzzzzz>"
>>>
>>> Wow, that was like a flame, only dull and insipid.
>>
>>Wow, that was like a flame, only retarded and boring.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking IKYABWAI.
Really, ANOTHER fucking tired, lame, boring, weak response. What was
that I said about you being mentally unable to update your game? Yeah,
your hardware lacks the necessary features to download the next
flamepack, so you're stuck making these pathetic little puffs of smoke
and bragging about what a badass you used to be "back in my day".
>>> That was you on the cover of Time a couple weeks ago with your mom,
>>> right?
>>
>>I don't subscribe to Time. Ever since that whole Hitler Person of the
>>Year thing back in '38, then Stalin in '39, they've lost all
>>credibility in my eyes.
>
> So, no clue what is happening in the news in the last 70+ years.
Translation:
"Us old-timers read magazines. Young people have that damnable
interwebby thing, with the tubes and the twitters and such! New
fangled technowizardry, it'll steal your soul and spy on you through
the CPU screen!"
<snicker>
>>See? I can do dated references, too! And they make just as much sense
>>today as your old, tired, stale, dated references do, fatass. Which is
>>none.
>
> So, pop cultural references are lost on you and you confuse fictional
> TV with real news.
You made a reference to an old-time TV show, I made a reference to an
old-time magazine. At least I had the presence of mind to make a
reference to something that's still around. You're just making
references to ancient and forgotten history, grandpa. And you're
plagiarizing what you write, by your own definition of the word.
SPNAK!
> Your delusions run deeper than even I imagined.
Pot, meet kettle. Kettle's an upstanding member of society who
contributes time, money and other resources to several worthy causes.
Pot is an old obese Alzheimer's sufferer who poops himself twice
daily.
>>Difference is, I did it on purpose to juxtapose your retardation
>>against my brilliance in juxtaposing your retardation against my
>>brilliance.
>
> Except for the part where your analogy fails. Other than that it was
> perfectly in line with your previous attempts.
Except for the part where it didn't fail. In that, it was perfectly in
line with my previous attempts.
>><snicker>
<snicker>
>>>>>>> Big talk for a FROGGER, Rarz !!
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Aratzio
>>>>>>
>>>>>>For some reason, his original post didn't show up on my server. Thank you,
>>>>>>Aratzio, for copying it in its entirety, so I have the luxury of replying.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure it didn't. That's right, "Oh I didn't see it". I am sure everyone
>>>>> of your socks believes that, well okay, some might the rest are
>>>>> laughing at your pathetic lie.
>>>>
>>>>Believe whatever you wish, Frothy. But do please continue frothing. It helps
>>>>to stave off yer Alzheimers.
>>>
>>> That is all you got? Several great straight lines left for you to riff
>>> off and the "yer old" was the absolute best you could come up with?
>>> Jebus fuck, you should stick to fucking up Shakespeare. There is at
>>> least a small chance that there is someone out there stupider than you
>>> are and won't realize (until I tell them) just how fucking stupid,
>>> unoriginal and lame you are.
>>
>>Says the retard who's using an old, tired and dated Lassie reference
>>as a flaming point.
>
> Should I mention that the Petard was a 16th century breaching device?
Yeah, I know, you retard. The reference was to you laying a camoflouge
trap, lying in wait, growing impatient that your trap hadn't caught
anything, then running out, ripping the camoflouge cover off the trap
and diving in headfirst, so you could say your stupidly laid trap
caught *something*.
> Given that and your consecutive foams about age and a TV pop culture
> reference that does appear to be making you less stable than yur usual
> manic self, I will go with *hoisted*.
Oh, but you argued so vociferously that it was "hoist", present tense.
You even lambasted me quite verbosely for using "hoisted"... and now
we know why you're known as Mr. Fucking Hypocrite.
> <twirls>
>
> So, foam on, brave Sir Robin, foam on! <- Pop Culture 1970s!!!!!
Plagiarist.
> OH NOES! WHAT WILL YOU DO NOW!!! MOAR AGE FAT GAY!!!
It's what my target audience not only demands, it's what he *is*.
>><snicker>
<snicker>
>>>>I'm helping you! :-)
>>>
>>> On that we can agree, I haven't played in a while and performing this
>>> public service and allowing me to warm up by kicking your nuts
>>> repeatedly is good. Well, for me, for you I'd suggest the Soprano role
>>> in Carmen.
>>
>><taps shoulder>
>>Excuse me, but those aren't my nuts you're kicking with such abandon.
>>They're yours. That you don't feel yourself booting your own nuts,
>>wow, that says a lot.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking IKYABWAI.
Really, ANOTHER fucking stuck in a rut, worn out, used over and over
until even he's sick of hearing it lamerism.
>>>>Yer welcome.
>>>
>>> I expect nothing less of kooks as stupid as you.
>>
>>You do realize you're getting your kook ass kicked squarely and
>>repeatedly, yes? Your voluminous screed is evidence of your pain, the
>>virtual yelp heard round the world.
>
> Really, ANOTHER fucking DELUSION.
Really, ANOTHER fucking stuck in a rut, worn out, used over and over
until even he's sick of hearing it lamerism.
>>>>> You do realize you forgot to use the correct sock to respond?
>>>>
>>>>You do realize nobody but obsessive geriatric cunts like you cares?
>>>
>>> You're getting testy. You should be all zen like I am, smirk on my
>>> face, twinkle in my eye as I just type my happy thoughts just for you.
>>
>>Testy? Me? Nah. You're the one screeding up a storm. I'm sitting back
>>and watching you wear out another keyboard, a smirk upon my face and a
>>twinkle in my wife's eye... that's why I gotta go.
>
> So, your new delusion is that typing a handful of paragraph across the
> course of a few ours as time permits will cause my keyboard to wear
> out.
No, your creating an 800+ line screeding textwall will cause your
keyboard to wear out. Especially since you'll be forced to do it again
and again, day after day, for *years*.
> Here is a question, cupcake, what makes you think it is a mechanical
> keyboard that can wear out? Oh, that is right, you cannot imagine
> anything that is not part of your own life. Getting outside that
> comfort zone of your own little world frightens you.
<sigh> Because you've stated in one of your previous posts that you
were having trouble TYPING because you hurt your fingers catching a
falling electronics card.
But do go on lying... or is your personal life as full of delusion as
your posts are?
Petard, retard?
> Sad how you kids cannot keep up with modern technology.
Sad to see an oldster lying to try to keep up with the kids.
>>;-)
>>
>>
>>>>> Now there at last count 7 spelling errors within the above post.
>>>>> Please feel free to use those rote trained spell checking skills you
>>>>> have spent these many years developing and find them.
>>>>
>>>>Why? You've already admitted to 7 SPNAKs, I've no need to find them. When a
>>>>kook is so demoralized that they'll admit to being spnak'd multiple times
>>>>per post, it's a pretty good indication that they're beaten, irreconcilably
>>>>and irredeemably.
>>>
>>> So, no, you couldn't find them and you probably spent hours pouring
>>> over each and every letter in each and every word praying that you
>>> could find those ego salving rabbit nuggets I left for you to nibble.
>>>
>>> It is interesting, since this all started with you believing that
>>> mechanical keyboard skills are the equivalent of intelligence. Now
>>> that you realize just how fucking stupid you looked, you don't want to
>>> go there again.
>>>
>>> So, who said kooks can't be trained. Of course all that works on them
>>> is aversion therapy.
>>
>>In your case, deep immersion in screed is the aversion therapy of
>>choice. You'll soon wear yourself out typing up a tsunami like that...
>>as all kooks do.
>
> Ah, the preparation of exit startegy, Beave Sir Robin, indeed.
Yes, your exit STARTEGY (mechanical or intellectual? <snicker>) is
that you'll auto-froth until your fingers drop off, then you'll
obsessively type with your nose until it's flat, then you'll try the
mouth stick, and finally you'll try voice dictation, only to find it's
gotten a mind of its own and keeps calling you "AGE FAT GAY!!!". Of
course, you'll blame all your mistakes on it.
"Beave Sir Robin"? What kind of porn are you watching?