Vincent Bugliosi is the Real Oliver Stone... a must read!
aeffects
http://www.patspeer.com/chapter9b%3Areclaiminghistoryfromreclaimin2
aeffects
> David Von Pein isn't going to like this.....
>
> http://www.patspeer.com/chapter9b%3Areclaiminghistoryfromreclaimin2
AND Robert Kennedy Jr. interviewed VinceB recently... here's the URL
to the MP3
http://www.radiodujour.com/people/bugliosi...entbugliosi.mp3
lazu...@webtv.net
mention of the name bugliosi turns my stomach...oh what I wouldn't give
for someone to put their index finger in that stuffed shirt's grill, and
read him the riot act...
David Von Pein
<chuckle>
Healy The Crackpipe actually seems to think that I haven't already
seen Mr. Speer's attempt at ripping Vince Bugliosi's book to shreds. I
saw it months ago. It's been on Pat's site for many, many months.
Pat's critique, however, is quite hollow and shallow (as all of the
supposedly-serious anti-VB critiques are). Mr. Speer has offered up
little of substance....and lots of whining and meaningless nitpicking.
In the long run, Mr. Bugliosi's excellent book "Reclaiming History"
holds up...and always shall (even against 50 Pat Speers).
Why?
Because Vincent Bugliosi has got it RIGHT. Lee Oswald did, indeed,
shoot and kill JFK and J.D. Tippit in Dallas. And LHO did it almost
certainly: alone.
Let me also add this:
While I think that VB's JFK book is, indeed, THE ultimate book on the
case (and how anyone can argue with that determination is beyond me)
-- I haven't hesitated to vocalize a few disagreements that I, myself,
have with VB regarding certain sub-topics relating to the case.
Multiple examples of my disagreeing with Vince can be found in my own
review of "RH":
www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/3200858-post.html
But none of these disagreements come close to undermining or tearing
down VB's bottom-line "LN" conclusion re. Oswald. No disagreement I
have with Vince could POSSIBLY do that --- because Lee Harvey Oswald
was (and is) guilty. Period.
David Von Pein
Healy can't even manage to post a working link. ~sigh~
So I'll have to post a link that works to the very good VB/RFK Jr.
interview (from July 12, 2008):
http://www.ringoffireradio.com/video/RF%20071208%20Hour%202%20Emails%20Vincent%20Bugliosi.mp3
It was previously posted here at acj, btw:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/af90bc9cebc00bdf
aeffects
> <chuckle>
>
Davey your so damn predictible.... Vinnie daShoe DABug is done, as are
you.... LMFAO!
Face son, you and your glorious idol can't close a deal.... you're
incompetent fools..... and we love it!
You're the best example FOR conspiracy... KUTGW!
aeffects
> Healy can't even manage to post a working link. ~sigh~
>
> So I'll have to post a link that works to the very good VB/RFK Jr.
> interview (from July 12, 2008):
>
>
> It was previously posted here at acj, btw:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/af90bc9cebc00bdf
son, your talking to yourself again..... must we keep reminding you of
that?
aeffects
David is now busy running from one end of Indiana to the other putting
out Bug fires.... Bugs latest BUSH tirade isn't going over well with
those conservative folks of Indiana.... Davey is perplexed and hasn't
a clue as to what to do.....
Stay tuned.... :)
Gil Jesus
The FBI report of 5 December 1963 failed to close the case.
The Warren Commission 26 volumes failed to close the case.
The Warren Commission Report failed to close the case.
Posner's book failed to close the case.
Myers' book failed to close the case.
Countless "Oswald did it" videos have failed to close the case.
The websites of McAdams, Rahn, Reitzes and the like have failed to
close the case.
Bugliosi's book failed to close the case.
....And now they will try again with an HBO video based on Bugliosi's
book.
If their case was so cut-and-dry why would they feel the need to keep
trying to present it time-and-time again after each and every
successive failure ?
Don't these people get it ?
lazu...@webtv.net
witnesses everywhere you turn- it's a shame though to see conspiracists
get sucked into the game-hypothetically speaking, but we see this all
the time on the various boards-2 conspiracists who may agree on 70%, but
will get in a bitter argument, then intensely dislike each other if one
believes Gordon Arnold & Badgeman say, and the other doesn't, and maybe
believes Ed Hoffman which the other won't...in any event, I hope people
are smart enough to realize that just because so and so writes a clever
debunking article on McAdams site doesn't mean it is 100% gospel, or
there isn't more to the story which there often is...Laz