Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DVP's JFK Assassination Arguments For May 2023 (Index)

95 views
Skip to first unread message

David Von Pein

unread,
May 25, 2023, 9:02:04 PM5/25/23
to
JFK Assassination Arguments (Part 1364) Table of Contents....

-----------------------------------------------

....Photos of Dallas at the turn of the 20th century.

....Vince Bugliosi's 53-item "Summary Of Oswald's Guilt".

....CTer silliness/idiocy re: J.D. Tippit's murder.

....Was Lee Oswald still hanging around Dealey Plaza as late as 1:12 PM on 11/22/63? A certain conspiracy fantasist thinks so.

....An 11/22/63 KLIF Radio interview with Earlene Roberts.

....The 30th Anniversary of Gerald Posner's "Case Closed".

....And More! ....

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2023/05/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-1364.html

Ben Holmes

unread,
May 30, 2023, 1:46:09 PM5/30/23
to
On Thu, 25 May 2023 18:02:03 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:

>JFK Assassination Arguments (Part 1364) Table of Contents....
>
>-----------------------------------------------
>
>....Photos of Dallas at the turn of the 20th century.
>
>....Vince Bugliosi's 53-item "Summary Of Oswald's Guilt".

If you cannot refute my refutations right here in open forum - doesn't
it embarrass you to reference Bugliosi's 53 reasons??

David Von Pein

unread,
May 30, 2023, 6:33:06 PM5/30/23
to
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:46:09 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> If you cannot refute my refutations right here in open forum - doesn't it embarrass you to reference Bugliosi's 53 reasons??

As Ben already knows, of course, what he just said above --- "you cannot refute my refutations right here in open forum" --- is a blatant and provable lie....

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2017/01/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-1227.html

Ben Holmes

unread,
May 30, 2023, 6:36:44 PM5/30/23
to
On Tue, 30 May 2023 15:33:05 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:46:09?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> If you cannot refute my refutations right here in open forum - doesn't it embarrass you to reference Bugliosi's 53 reasons??
>
>As Ben already knows, of course, what he just said above --- "you cannot refute my refutations right here in open forum" --- is a blatant and provable lie....

I don't know that. You're incapable of proving it to me.

Citing a website isn't "right here in open forum," is it?

Run coward... RUN!!!

David Von Pein

unread,
May 30, 2023, 7:11:37 PM5/30/23
to
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 6:36:44 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> Citing a website isn't "right here in open forum," is it?

Oh good! Ben's now going to play the little game where he pretends not to know that every last bit of my "Part 1227" blog page was derived from posts that were first written HERE at this acj newsgroup. And Ben will also pretend that I haven't linked back to each of the original ACJ discussions at the bottom of my Part 1227 page (see the anchor link below).

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2017/01/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-1227.html#Original-Source-Links

I guess Ben expects me to repeat my arguments and write them out again and again--in full--every single time the subject of "Bugliosi's Big 53" comes up (or *any* other JFK topic that I've already covered in the past). Which, of course, would be a time-consuming and needless thing to do. Hence, my multi-topic "JFK Archives" site exists---to be used as a reference when various JFK sub-topics are discussed in the future.

I wonder how many times Ben has already been told these things by me? Too many to count, I know that.

Ben Holmes

unread,
May 30, 2023, 7:19:28 PM5/30/23
to
On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:11:35 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 6:36:44?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> Citing a website isn't "right here in open forum," is it?
>
>Oh good! Ben's now going to play the little game...

Where a website is *NOT* "right here in open forum."

Yep.

It's a simple statement.

And you've been unable to refute it. I told you to run...

AND LIKE THE COWARD YOU ARE - YOU DID!

David Von Pein

unread,
May 30, 2023, 7:24:53 PM5/30/23
to
If you want to get on that merry-go-round again.....get on it by yourself.

Ben Holmes

unread,
May 30, 2023, 7:33:45 PM5/30/23
to
On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:24:52 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:
Yep... you're a proven coward. You've refused to support your claims
here in open forum EVERY SINGLE TIME I POINT IT OUT!

Run coward... RUN!!

David Von Pein

unread,
May 30, 2023, 7:45:46 PM5/30/23
to
And the merry-go-round spins faster and faster....

Below are dozens (maybe hundreds) of "open forum" DVP vs. Holmes encounters. All are merely figments (I guess)....

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/search?q=Ben+Holmes

Ben Holmes

unread,
May 30, 2023, 8:06:44 PM5/30/23
to
On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:45:45 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:

Bud

unread,
May 30, 2023, 8:19:15 PM5/30/23
to
Good to see Ben back swamp-posting.

David Von Pein

unread,
May 30, 2023, 8:32:32 PM5/30/23
to
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/9K5wSS6Ep4M/m/1E76UmClAQAJ

Ben Holmes

unread,
May 31, 2023, 10:06:47 AM5/31/23
to
On Tue, 30 May 2023 17:32:31 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 8:19:15?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
Ah! So despite the fact that Chickenshit can't define it, Von Penis
defines it by the time stamps. He can't *CITE* for it... so I'll
simply ignore his unsupported opinion.

John Corbett

unread,
May 31, 2023, 10:43:58 AM5/31/23
to
I thought the dip into piranha infested waters was to much to hope for.

Ben Holmes

unread,
May 31, 2023, 10:53:17 AM5/31/23
to
On Wed, 31 May 2023 07:43:57 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>I thought the dip into piranha infested waters was to much to hope for.

This is indeed what happens every time a believer talks about the
evidence in this case.

Bud

unread,
May 31, 2023, 1:30:21 PM5/31/23
to
Yes, the Swamp Monster has returned.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Jun 8, 2023, 9:29:50 AM6/8/23
to
On Tue, 30 May 2023 17:19:13 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
Good to see Chickenshit posting logical fallacies rather than
evidence.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Jun 8, 2023, 9:30:08 AM6/8/23
to
On Wed, 31 May 2023 10:30:20 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:

>On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 10:43:58?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 8:19:15?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 8:06:44?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:45:45 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
>>>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 7:33:45?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:24:52 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
>>>>>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 7:19:28?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:11:35 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
>>>>>>>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 6:36:44?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Citing a website isn't "right here in open forum," is it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Oh good! Ben's now going to play the little game...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where a website is *NOT* "right here in open forum."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's a simple statement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And you've been unable to refute it. I told you to run...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> AND LIKE THE COWARD YOU ARE - YOU DID!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If you want to get on that merry-go-round again.....get on it by yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep... you're a proven coward. You've refused to support your claims
>>>>>> here in open forum EVERY SINGLE TIME I POINT IT OUT!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Run coward... RUN!!
>>>>>
>>>>>And the merry-go-round spins faster and faster....
>>>>
>>>> Yep... you're a proven coward. You've refused to support your claims
>>>> here in open forum EVERY SINGLE TIME I POINT IT OUT!

Logical fallacies deleted.
0 new messages