Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Question That Won't Go Away...

20 views
Skip to first unread message

Ben Holmes

unread,
Aug 18, 2023, 5:26:55 PM8/18/23
to

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it.

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

Bud

unread,
Aug 18, 2023, 5:34:28 PM8/18/23
to
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:26:55 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
> "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
>
> Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question.

I already pointed out that it isn`t an honest question.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Aug 18, 2023, 5:53:01 PM8/18/23
to

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows

Bud

unread,
Aug 18, 2023, 6:09:20 PM8/18/23
to
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:53:01 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
> "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
> Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question.

<snicker> What is it worth when a dishonest person declares a question "honest".

> He knows
> that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
> get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
>
> It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
> where he has EVER answered it.

Of course I answered it. The answer is that the question is loaded. You isolate information and assume the answer resolves the issue in your favor. That is the answer.

> So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

Keep asking a question I`ve already answered if it makes you happy.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Aug 18, 2023, 6:14:46 PM8/18/23
to

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it.

Bud

unread,
Aug 18, 2023, 7:58:20 PM8/18/23
to
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 6:14:46 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
> "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
> Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question.

<snicker> Ben is terrified to ask one.

> He knows
> that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
> get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
>
> It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
> where he has EVER answered it.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/3frbprHt_ng/m/DhQaXQFnAQAJ

Ben Holmes

unread,
Aug 18, 2023, 8:13:26 PM8/18/23
to

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it.

0 new messages