Specifications (my personal settings for every Ram I align): all specs
below are in degrees.
Left Wheel Right Wheel
-------------- ----------------
Caster 3.2 3.5
Cross Caster -.3
Camber -.10 -.10
Cross Camber 0.0
Toe - standard specs, (maybe a little out if you tow a lot, they will
pull in as the front end lifts up).
Brent
ASE Certified
Gold Certified Chrysler tech
Denny
<B377...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:21931-38...@storefull-137.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
Lee
--
David K. Johnson
EMail: cgwr...@netins.net
<B377...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:21931-38...@storefull-137.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
Where are you at in Iowa???
For the real info. Glad to here you are staying.
Can you add anything as it regards to a 4X2?
My '99 has had the problem from the showroom.
Thanks
Phrede
<B377...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:21931-38...@storefull-137.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
Lee
An Iowegien???
Is that sort of like a Norwegien???
Old age and treachery will overcome youth and enthusiasm
Happiness is driving an ass kicking big block Mopar
Those Southern Iowegians always told me is was Misery down there???
--
-Michele
dodgeew...@nllfan.com
(remove -NOSPAM to e-mail)
"Mopar Man" <mis...@netins.net> wrote in message
news:880sh9$nus$1...@ins22.netins.net...
I got a letter from my ex while I was in Basic there back in 1970 and
that's how she addressed it.
Ft. Leonard Wood, Misery.
RedNeck from Hell <mopa...@aol.comxxx> wrote in message
news:20000212114533...@ng-cp1.aol.com...
>I got a letter from my ex while I was in Basic there back in 1970 and
>that's how she addressed it.
I was in basic training there in fall of 1961. What an awful bivouac area
it was - major mud in the rain! Only place I've ever been where you could
walk to a firing range, and then walk back, and have it be up hill in both
directions!
Fitch
In So. Cal. High Desert
1995 Reg. Cab 2WD 2500SLT/12V/5spd/4.10/Turnover Ball gooseneck hitch/Tekonsha Sentinel
1999 QC 2 WD 3500SLT/24V/5spd/3.55/customized mirrors/Turnover Ball gooseneck hitch/Tekonsha Sentinel/Class IV DrawTite rear hitch.
RedNeck from Hell wrote:
>
> >ell, I know that Ft. Leonard Wood is in Misery.
> >
> >I got a letter from my ex while I was in Basic there back in 1970 and
> >that's how she addressed it.
> >
> >Ft. Leonard Wood, Misery.
> >
> From pictures I have seen, I would have to agree!!!
> I went Navy so missed out on all that.
> I believe Fort Leonard Wood is now closed?
>
> Old age and treachery will overcome youth and enthusiasm
> Happiness is driving an ass kicking big block Mopar
If it is, then the Army has taken a "kinder / gentler" attitude, for
sure. While I was there Satan came around looking for ideas to make Hell
more hellish.
Hmmm. Maybe I ought to check it out. . . .of course, if they did close
it, then the prostitution business in Waynesville closed over night.
"Fitch R. Williams" wrote:
>
> "Charles Cochran" <ctre...@ris.net> wrote:
>
> >I got a letter from my ex while I was in Basic there back in 1970 and
> >that's how she addressed it.
>
> I was in basic training there in fall of 1961. What an awful bivouac area
> it was - major mud in the rain! Only place I've ever been where you could
> walk to a firing range, and then walk back, and have it be up hill in both
> directions!
>
By Jan 1970 ( when I entered basic) they had improved it by making all
trips by foot uphill, even to the mess hall.
It was really weird to see a basketball rolling down hill and find
yourself running uphill to chase it. . . . . and _that_ was on the
courts!!!
Mike, the chem training and MP training Fort in Al was McClellan.
Not sure of the spelling though.
Fitch R. Williams <frwi...@ptw.com> wrote in message
news:2oghascunlfm2hna8...@4ax.com...
> "Mike Simmons" <mik...@fidnet.com> wrote:
>
> >For the group's info, Fort Leonard Wood is VERY much open and growing by
> >leaps and bounds!
> >
> >Yup, the doggies still do basic training there but the Army has moved the
> >engineering training command from Ft. Belvior, NJ to Ft. Wood and now
they
> >are in the process of moving all chem/bio training from Ft. Rucker (I
> >believe), AL. Also, they are the primary military police training
command
> >for the Army.
>
> I hope they buried the infiltration course!
>
> As I recall - one of its major missions when I was there (egad - was it
> really 39 years ago? Don't answer that!) was training of the Army
> Engineering corp. They were doing bridges and other things. There were
> also a few tanks and tank retrievers there (talk about your two vehicle,
> those tank retrievers were something else). It also had a huge parade
> field.
>
> One of my big lessons, which I retell to this day is related to that
parade
> field. Before our last trip to the practice range with was to be followed
> in two days by a trip to the record range, the Drill Sargent told us he
> would put the whole company (C-2-2) on detail the whole day Sunday if we
> didn't have more folks shoot expert than "D" company.
>
> Well, we sat in the barracks that night (WW-II "temporary" wooden barracks
> thankyouverymuch) and allowed that there were not that many "Bloody
Mary's"
> and trashcans in the place to keep the whole company busy on detail for a
> whole day. The whole area was clean enough to eat off. After some
> discussion we said "they can't do that. They can't put us all on detail
> for the whole day". We should have known better .... really, we should
> have ...
>
> Well, the days went by, we went to the record range, and while I shot
> expert with the M-1 with some margin, we didn't have enough folks shoot
> expert - "D" company beat us by 3.
>
> They had not forgotten.
>
> Sunday morning it was up and out of there just like it was a week day.
> They marched us over to the parade field. A huge field covered every
> square inch with lush green grass. They lined us up in one looooong
line -
> 240 soldiers with our arms out straight from the shoulders long. Then
they
> told us to mow the parade field by breaking off individual stems of grass.
> I forget the language used, and the exact wording, but it was abundantly
> clear that it would be the worst thing imaginable for them to find we had
> pulled up any grass, or that we were not breaking them off individually.
>
> I have never said since then, "they can't do that". Because, trust me on
> this, "they" can!
>
> I'm probably more than a little radical in my thinking on compulsory
> military service. I know quite a few people that would have benefitted
> from being in the service - and frankly I'd support 100% drafting of
> everybody, including women, to do 9 months in the service. (Including
> those in wheel chairs and on crutches - they can do something suitable to
> their physical condition, and work in supply, or an office, but be there
> and have the experience). The key is there would be few or no exceptions
> to the draft (there would have to be some, but a heck of a lot less than
> most folks think).
>
> Your religion says you can't shoot, that's just fine, you can be a medic,
> or a cook, or do KP while the rest of us learn to shoot, or work the paper
> hassle, or be a permanent janitor at the training camp, but you go and
> march, and train, and crawl, and do everything but shoot - you can be the
> "go-fer" at the range. You want to vote and own property, you go.
Period.
>
> Learn to shoot both a rifle and a pistol, throw a grenade (that will have
> you changing your under ware if you do it wrong and survive), learn to
> follow orders, learn to respect and understand folks for what they are
> because you sure can't tell by the choice of clothes and hair cut, learn
> the meaning of team work, learn to pitch a tent, learn to crawl in the
dirt
> and mud and cold and snow and dust and heat. Learn the basics of compass
> navigation, covering terrain in the dark, get a heck of a good first aid
> course, learn to salute, learn what the flag stands for, and above all,
> learn to appreciate the true meaning of equality (there is nothing more
> equal than a bunch of recruits getting their heads shaved), and what you
> have as a civilian. Learn to be shouted at and take it when you have to.
> Learn some basic unarmed combat techniques. Go from basic to a school
> (mechanics, electronics, water purification, bridge building, I don't care
> - learn some practical skill) or to AIT - grow up a little or a lot
> depending ...
>
> It was a heck of a beneficial learning experience. I know I am a better
> man for it - and it is my personal opinion that it would be a better
> country if everybody had at least that minimum military experience. I
know
> it would have been good for all three of my kids - one was in the Marines
> for 7 years and it did him a lot of good. I know it will never happen,
but
> that doesn't change the fact that I would support it.
>
> Then I would say you take your weapons and your basic equipment, canteen,
> bayonet, entrenching tool (they still have them? Right?), home with you,
> and be responsible for them, and keep them cleaned and working order, and
> practice with them from time to time. Just like the Swiss do.
>
> That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
>
> Fitch"the radical"Williams
I too agree 100% with your philosophy! My stint in the Marine's was very
beneficial and it seems to be proving so with my oldest son as well. There
is a lot to be said for the "military experience".
Yeah, Parthe, you are right it was McClellan. I remember now that a lot of
the tree-huggers got their knickers in a knot when the announced they were
bringing chem/bio to Ft. Wood. They felt that the training would spoil the
Ozark wilderness forever.
Uncle Sam prevailed and the training is now here.
Mike
Parthe N. Ogenesis <parthen...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:saisbf...@news.supernews.com...
Sorry for the rant, just my 2 cents worth.
Parthe N. Ogenesis <parthen...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:saln88s...@news.supernews.com...
Semper Fi!
Mike
Dave Carr <dc...@uniontel.net> wrote in message
news:EtFq4.314$q2.13...@news.wctc.net...