SKEPTIC LOGIC AT IT'S FINEST!
Graham Cooper
> > >> > I am thinking of a Question
> > >> Page 47 Line 6
.
[HERC]
> > > ANSWER
> > > **The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe**
.
[PETER BOWDTICH]
The Question was
Why is chicken curry so delicious?
.
[HERC]
Q: Why is chicken curry delicious?
A: *The fire went out* and *lady duck* and *ungainly*
**The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe**
Absolutely perfect answer!! for a blind random quote!
.
[GOD]
It's delicious when the fire goes out. Try curried duck but make sure
it's a female! Very slimming too!
.
[CLOCKY]
But what if Peter likes a hot curry?
____________________________
*FACE PALM*
Herc
raven1
<graham...@gmail.com> wrote:
>[HERC]
>
>Q: Why is chicken curry delicious?
>A: *The fire went out* and *lady duck* and *ungainly*
>
>**The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe**
>
>Absolutely perfect answer!! for a blind random quote!
And you wonder why absolutely no one takes you seriously.
Alex
> [HERC]
>
> Q: Why is chicken curry delicious?
> A: *The fire went out* and *lady duck* and *ungainly*
>
> **The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe**
>
> Absolutely perfect answer!! for a blind random quote!
Just a few rather ironic observations:
1. You got the question wrong (so logically your quote can't be it's answer).
2. Your "answer" makes no sense whatsoever. Even after you've massaged it
to cherry-pick the words which have a tenuous link to food in general.
Congratulations, to a question asking why a particular dish is delicious,
you answer boils down (no pun intended) to "the fire went out", "ducked"
and (rather bizarrely) "ungainly".
> *FACE PALM*
Yes, that's pretty much the general reaction after another exhibition of how
you mind functions.
Alex.
--
> You're a fucking c*&t Alex, you're number 1 on my TODO LIST
>
> I'M GOING TO FIND YOU IN PERSON - GUARANTEED
- Graham Cooper AKA GENESIS ADAM in AUS.TV
Graham Cooper
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 17:59:52 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper
>
> >[HERC]
>
> >Q: Why is chicken curry delicious?
> >A: *The fire went out* and *lady duck* and *ungainly*
>
> >**The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe**
>
> >Absolutely perfect answer!! for a blind random quote!
>
> And you wonder why absolutely no one takes you seriously.
Uhh you're a skeptic dude
Herc
Peter Bowditch
>[PETER BOWDITCH]
>
>> > >> > I am thinking of a Question
>> > >> Page 47 Line 6
>
>.
>
>
>[HERC]
>
>> > > ANSWER
>> > > **The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe**
>
>.
>
>
>[PETER BOWDTICH]
>
>The Question was
>Why is chicken curry so delicious?
No, the question was "Why is lamb curry so delicious?"
>
>.
>
>[HERC]
>
>Q: Why is chicken curry delicious?
>A: *The fire went out* and *lady duck* and *ungainly*
>
>**The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe**
>
>Absolutely perfect answer!! for a blind random quote!
>
>.
>
>
>[GOD]
>
>It's delicious when the fire goes out. Try curried duck but make sure
>it's a female! Very slimming too!
Which has what to do with lamb curry?
>
>
>.
>
>
>[CLOCKY]
>
>But what if Peter likes a hot curry?
>____________________________
>
>
>
>*FACE PALM*
>
>Herc
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
I'm @RatbagsDotCom on Twitter
Government Shill #2
wrote:
>[HERC]
>
>Q: Why is chicken curry delicious?
>A: *The fire went out* and *lady duck* and *ungainly*
>
>**The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe**
>
>Absolutely perfect answer!! for a blind random quote!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
You crack me up!
http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_sounds/hg/looney.wav
Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman
The Man From Havana
> [PETER BOWDITCH]
>
> > > >> > I am thinking of a Question
> > > >> Page 47 Line 6
>
> .
>
> [HERC]
>
> > > > ANSWER
> > > > **The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe**
>
> .
>
> [PETER BOWDTICH]
>
> The Question was
> Why is chicken curry so delicious?
>
> .
>
> [HERC]
>
> Q: Why is chicken curry delicious?
>
This is what you're full of kook !
Clocky
"Graham Cooper" <graham...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ccbd96e3-c02a-4062...@h25g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
I hate to break it to you, but there are so many different types of curries
that your association is meaningless.
Are you saying Peter likes his curries hot or not?
Graham Cooper
> "Graham Cooper" <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote in message
ummm, mild?
Herc
Clocky
ummm, mild?
Your "answer", as nonsensical as it is, makes no such distinction.
Malte Runz
news:82fad6a4-1688-4941...@e26g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
(snip)
> This is what you're full of kook !
>
>
> http://www.veronicamoser.com/images/mosers5.jpg
Seriously... You shouldn't post links like that without warning people. I
was eating, for fuck's sake!
--
Malte Runz
Peter Bowditch
Actually, I don't like very hot curries except maybe if there's beef
in there.
I'm glad I thought of lamb curry and not red curry with duck or we'd
be here all night.
raven1
And you're a looney. The above is classic schizophrenic
free-association, where anything at all can be connected to anything
else in your own mind.
DavidW
that supernatural powers fascinate people is that they are, well, _powers_ that
are useful and give those who have them a big advantage over mere mortals. A
clairevoyant can see what others can't; a telepathist can transfer information
to another mind; a parapsychologist can sit in the front row staring at a chess
player and put him off his game; Carrie can move objects; Allison Dubois gets
useful information from dead people. What can _you_ do that is useful to you or
anyone else?
Graham Cooper
I'm son of God you dumbwad
practically every power in every magic novel I can do.
don't blame me if you spend 10 years asking me what's in your pocket.
you mortals are infinitely more stupid than you realise!
Herc
DavidW
If you have such great powers, why do you have to devise such complicated and
lengthy tests with strict conditions just to read a single word in a person's
mind, and even then abandon them if your channel gets the slightest disturbance,
such as an unwanted post appearing in the thread? And even then the best you can
do is fail completely or produce a verse with only the most tenuous connection
to the word? If someone is thinking of lamb curry then stop mucking about and
just post back that they are thinking of lamb curry.
Describe one supernatural capability you have that has a _practical_ use.
Graham Cooper
What's so difficult about guessing the word you are thinking of?
I can channel 100 words a day but you're too gullible to see if they
match.
So I have to guess them myself, you have this preconception of magic
test = pass a written exam.
There are few logical constraints for me to make objective guesses, a
temporal space between the channels so they line up properly, and
silence because God would rather join in the actual conversation.
you wasted 6 months debating it, I just wanted 4 days to do the 4
channels.
Peter didn't ask WHAT AM I THINKING OF?
He asked WHY IS L. C. DELICIOUS?
THE FIRE!
It doesn't matter if I give a perfect 1,000,000:1 exactly right
answer like that, you will always call it tenuous at best because you
are all utter fucking morons.
Herc
DavidW
What do you mean "see if they match"? If someone is thinking of DANGER, just
answer DANGER and we can all see that they match.
> So I have to guess them myself, you have this preconception of magic
> test = pass a written exam.
>
> There are few logical constraints for me to make objective guesses, a
> temporal space between the channels so they line up properly, and
> silence because God would rather join in the actual conversation.
>
> you wasted 6 months debating it, I just wanted 4 days to do the 4
> channels.
>
> Peter didn't ask WHAT AM I THINKING OF?
>
> He asked WHY IS L. C. DELICIOUS?
>
> THE FIRE!
But that's not why it's delicious. He said he doesn't like it very hot. I would
say that it's a bit of heat, all the spices that go into curry, but mostly the
_lamb_, that makes it delicious. If you just want fire then eat a raw chilli.
> It doesn't matter if I give a perfect 1,000,000:1 exactly right
> answer like that, you will always call it tenuous at best because you
> are all utter fucking morons.
Exactly right is when I'm thinking of PINEAPPLE and you post PINEAPPLE. It is
not when you answer "The fire went out and Eli ducked under an ungainly swipe"
to a question about lamb curry.
Graham Cooper
Telling you what word you are thinking is not useful.
Giving a 'description, meaning, or definition' is.
So I can only tell you what word you are thinking when given several
options.
Got that far?
Herc
DavidW
What I still haven't got yet is a _practical_ use for your paranormal ability
considering all the rules, conditions, subjectivity, excuses and mental
gymnastics one has to get past and still not get a reasonable answer.
Graham Cooper
I can pass a Zener Mindreading Test.
I can answer any question of real interest.
I can summon things to happen.
I can predict things
I'm immortal until I mate Eve
I get information on everything I need to know
I can make all the right business decisions.
The whole universes events are focussed through me.
If I walk into a room the TV says hello, the truman show love it but
none of you notice.
What YOU consider useful are petty tricks to me. this time next year
I'll be clearing $50K a week from CamGirls.com
Herc
Government Shill #2
<graham...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'm son of God you dumbwad
>
>practically every power in every magic novel I can do.
>
>don't blame me if you spend 10 years asking me what's in your pocket.
>
>you mortals are infinitely more stupid than you realise!
http://www.schizophrenia.com/earlysigns.htm
Examples of Delusions----
[Among t]he most common type of delusion or false beliefs are paranoid
delusions. These are persecutory in nature and take many forms:
<snip>
--Religious delusions- that you are Jesus, God, a prophet, or the antichrist.
Graham Cooper
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:15:34 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper
>
> >I'm son of God you dumbwad
>
> >practically every power in every magic novel I can do.
>
> >don't blame me if you spend 10 years asking me what's in your pocket.
>
> >you mortals are infinitely more stupid than you realise!
>
> http://www.schizophrenia.com/earlysigns.htm
>
> Examples of Delusions----
> [Among t]he most common type of delusion or false beliefs are paranoid
> delusions. These are persecutory in nature and take many forms:
> <snip>
> --Religious delusions- that you are Jesus, God, a prophet, or the antichrist.
>
> http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_sounds/hg/looney.wav
>
Spot the hypocrites always demanding objective deductions then
resorting to convenient inferences!
Herc
Clocky
"DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote in message
news:4e1b8bd1$0$24955$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com...
> Herc, what use is your paranormal ability? What's all this fuss for? The
> reason that supernatural powers fascinate people is that they are, well,
> _powers_ that are useful and give those who have them a big advantage over
> mere mortals. A clairevoyant can see what others can't; a telepathist can
> transfer information to another mind; a parapsychologist can sit in the
> front row staring at a chess player and put him off his game; Carrie can
> move objects; Allison Dubois gets useful information from dead people.
None of those people have special paranormal powers and neither does Graham.
What can _you_ do that is useful to you or
> anyone else?
>
Nothing evidently.
Clocky
THE FIRE!
Fire isn't what makes a lamb curry delicious because, as has already been
pointed out to you many times, an awful lot of curries are not hot at all,
and, furthermore, Peter indicated that he prefers his curries mild - not
hot.
Som that's a double fail on your supposed "answer".
Not only that, you deliberately changed the question from "lamb" to
"chicken" so you could somehow incorporate "duck" into the answer.
Another double fail, because lamb isn't chicken and duck isn't chicken
either.
So, your answer was a complete non-answer - ironically - as predicted by
others.
Clocky
Graham once again revises why he's the posterchild for schizophrenic
symptoms.
He's got them all...
Clocky
Considering all your supposed self-evident powers, how come there is nobody
in the world that has witnessed any of them.
Have you considered that they are just delusions?
Graham Cooper
>
> > <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >I'm son of God you dumbwad
>
> > >practically every power in every magic novel I can do.
>
> > >don't blame me if you spend 10 years asking me what's in your pocket.
>
> > >you mortals are infinitely more stupid than you realise!
>
> >http://www.schizophrenia.com/earlysigns.htm
>
> > Examples of Delusions----
> > [Among t]he most common type of delusion or false beliefs are paranoid
> > delusions. These are persecutory in nature and take many forms:
> > <snip>
> > --Religious delusions- that you are Jesus, God, a prophet, or the
> > antichrist.
>
> >http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_sounds/hg/looney.wav
>
> Spot the hypocrites always demanding objective deductions then
> resorting to convenient inferences!
>
> Considering all your supposed self-evident powers, how come there is nobody
> in the world that has witnessed any of them.
>
> Have you considered that they are just delusions?
SILENT - Why is curry delicious?
BLIND - The Fire
Clocky - Fail, because not all curry is hot!
Skeptic logic at it's finest!
Herc
Clocky
BLIND - The Fire
People don't eat curry because its hot, dopey, because most traditional
curries aren't hot.
Clocky - Fail, because not all curry is hot!
AND Peter prefers it mild, so FIRE is not a match for two reasons.
Skeptic logic at it's finest!
Clearly concise logical thought is beyond your comprehension.
We already know why.
Government Shill #2
Hey Clocky. Could you do me a favour and put something between your's and the
son of god's words, so that I can tell who said what? Anything. A couple of
**'s?
Ta.
Shill #2
--
Pay Section
Disinformation Directorate
Ministry of Information
Antipodean Division
BDK
@k23g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, graham...@gmail.com says...
>
> On Jul 12, 9:47 am, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> > Herc, what use is your paranormal ability? What's all this fuss for? The reason
> > that supernatural powers fascinate people is that they are, well, _powers_ that
> > are useful and give those who have them a big advantage over mere mortals. A
> > clairevoyant can see what others can't; a telepathist can transfer information
> > to another mind; a parapsychologist can sit in the front row staring at a chess
> > player and put him off his game; Carrie can move objects; Allison Dubois gets
> > useful information from dead people. What can _you_ do that is useful to you or
> > anyone else?
>
> I'm son of God you dumbwad
So the son of God is a chubby, mumbling lunatic?
That's what you are, so....
>
> practically every power in every magic novel I can do.
No, you can't. You haven't shown any ability to even make sense, or
being able to stop mumbling, let alone perform magic.
>
> don't blame me if you spend 10 years asking me what's in your pocket.
I would rather find out what's in your head.
>
> you mortals are infinitely more stupid than you realise!
What are you going to think when you have your first heart attack, or
get cancer? Will you realize then you're a "mortal" too?
>
> Herc
--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!
george
> So the son of God is a chubby, mumbling lunatic?
And according to their bable been dead for 2000 years...
Obese bones gonna walk around
Graham Cooper
> On Jul 13, 3:13 am, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>
> > So the son of God is a chubby, mumbling lunatic?
http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
I meant 2011 - taken last week.
This was me in 2001!
Herc
Graham Cooper
Does this look OBESE to you?
http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
I can't shop for food or train without the Truman Company amping up
the sonic torture.
Herc
Government Shill #2
<graham...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jul 13, 6:39 am, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
>> On Jul 13, 3:13 am, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > So the son of God is a chubby, mumbling lunatic?
>>
>> And according to their bable been dead for 2000 years...
>> Obese bones gonna walk around
>
>
>Does this look OBESE to you?
>
>http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
Wow! Axe murderer eyes, or what?
How many chins are there in that 10 year old picture?
>I can't shop for food or train without the Truman Company amping up
>the sonic torture.
You could. Take the pills.
Government Shill #2
Yes. You do look obese in that one. Nice tits though!
Shill #2
--
Cleavage. The one thing you can approve of whilst simultaneously looking down
upon.
Graham Cooper
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:00:03 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper
>
> >On Jul 13, 6:39 am, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
> >> On Jul 13, 3:13 am, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>
> >> > So the son of God is a chubby, mumbling lunatic?
>
> >http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
>
> >I meant 2011 - taken last week.
>
> >This was me in 2001!
>
> >http://hercshome.com/herc.jpg
>
> Yes. You do look obese in that one. Nice tits though!
>
you're a fucktard shill
Herc
BDK
@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>, graham...@gmail.com says...
>
> On Jul 13, 6:39 am, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
> > On Jul 13, 3:13 am, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > So the son of God is a chubby, mumbling lunatic?
> >
> > And according to their bable been dead for 2000 years...
> > Obese bones gonna walk around
>
>
> Does this look OBESE to you?
>
> http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
No, but it does look insane. Scary as hell, in fact.
>
> I can't shop for food or train without the Truman Company amping up
> the sonic torture.
>
>
> Herc
Oh boy. If you took the meds, all that stuff would go away.
DavidW
Graham Cooper
> In article <eef4e498-cf41-4d58-85e2-c0f1b843d6b3
>
>
>
> > On Jul 13, 6:39 am, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
> > > On Jul 13, 3:13 am, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > So the son of God is a chubby, mumbling lunatic?
>
> > > And according to their bable been dead for 2000 years...
> > > Obese bones gonna walk around
>
> > Does this look OBESE to you?
>
> >http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
>
> No, but it does look insane. Scary as hell, in fact.
cute as little red riding hood if you ask me!
http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
Gets all the girls that's good enough for me!
>
>
>
> > I can't shop for food or train without the Truman Company amping up
> > the sonic torture.
>
> > Herc
>
> Oh boy. If you took the meds, all that stuff would go away.
>
thanks for your concern but you are wrong about a great many thing
Herc
Graham Cooper
> Government Shill #2 wrote:
> > Hey Clocky. Could you do me a favour and put something between your's
> > and the son of god's words, so that I can tell who said what?
> > Anything. A couple of **'s?
>
> Clocky needs:http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
>
You'd have to reverse the effects of long term alcohol abuse to fix
Clocky's quotes!
Herc
Clocky
http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
The eyes have it, scary.
You look like one of those plackard waving lunatics that sleeps under the
bridge
Graham Cooper
> "Graham Cooper" <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Lol! the girls love my big eyes, not as much as my fan club when I
was younger!
.
SKEPTICS - Let's test if you can answer a question blind!
SILENT - Why is curry delicious?
BLIND - The Fire
Clocky - Fail, because not all curry is hot!
Skeptic logic at it's finest!
.
2nd Go!
SKEPTICS think of a word
SILENT - FEAR
BLIND - to compensate with rising fire
i.e. increasing anger to deal with a threat
SKEPTICS - Fail
.
2 out of 2 if any RATIONAL FAIR PERSON analysed the blind answers!
"to compensate with rising fire" - very apt definition of FEAR!
Herc
DavidW
Herc, I thought we had settled the matter of subjectivity, but now you've gone
back to it. You'll get nowhere trying to persuade anyone that the above examples
are matches. If someone's word is FEAR, you have to come up with FEAR. Are you
unable to do that? I thought you said you could read minds. Not some expression
with a vague connection with FEAR, but the actual word FEAR. If you want to use
subjective methods to produce the right word, fine, but you still have to
produce the right word before you are told what it is. Otherwise your power is
useless.
Graham Cooper
I'm just asking you to use your intelligence!
If none of you agree the answers are apt then none of you will bother
to do an objective test.
If given the options
TO COMPENSATE THE FLAMES GREW IN SIZE
A/ television
B/ sky
C/ fear
D/ chair
I, and most people giving it a fair shot, would select C/FEAR
hence reading nu...@bid.nes mind EXACTLY!
http://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b8b72e7dc761369c
Herc
DavidW
So, with all those fantastic powers you have - being the son of God and
possessing "practically every power in every magic novel" - your best
mindreading effort is a highly subjective and tenuous connection between a verse
and a word, and then only when it's multiple choice. Aren't you embarrassed?
Buddythunder
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b8b72e7dc761369c
>
> Herc- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
It's been said before, and it'll be said again, but in all
seriousness: seek help, Herc.
Graham Cooper
The president of Australian Skeptics asked me to answer his question
he was merely thinking of.
I stated his answer was THE FIRE....
His revealed his question was WHY IS CURRY DELICIOUS?
You keep flipping from Bah it's subjective to Bah it's objective.
If infinite knowledge doesn't impress you and Zener Mindreading Test
objective pass / fail doesn't impress you then sorry, I can't levitate
boulders for your amusement.
Herc
DavidW
I have never said, and would never say, "Bah it's objective."
> If infinite knowledge doesn't impress you and Zener Mindreading Test
> objective pass / fail doesn't impress you then sorry,
A Zener card test is objective. You haven't passed one of those yet. By your own
admission you can't pass them because the question "Which card am I holding?" is
not one that anyone is really interested in.
> I can't levitate boulders for your amusement.
Then at least tell me the word I have just written down in blue pen.
raven1
<graham...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I can't shop for food or train without the Truman Company amping up
>the sonic torture.
No one is torturing you, you are experiencing auditory hallucinations,
and attributing them to a fictional company from a movie. Herc, in all
seriousness, the doctors who told you that you're schizophrenic were
right, and you demonstrate it with every post. I know that it won't
help when you're in this state, but please consider competent
psychiatric help when you're more lucid.
Graham Cooper
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:57:22 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper
>
> >I can't shop for food or train without the Truman Company amping up
> >the sonic torture.
>
> No one is torturing you, you are experiencing auditory hallucinations,
> and attributing them to a fictional company from a movie. Herc, in all
> seriousness, the doctors who told you that you're schizophrenic were
> right, and you demonstrate it with every post. I know that it won't
> help when you're in this state, but please consider competent
> psychiatric help when you're more lucid.
just fuckoff you lying stupid blind heathen
Herc
DavidW
And what should I do?
Graham Cooper
what purpose what that have?
none of you will do an objective test and you say I can't pass one.
You think of a word - I REMOTE VIEW THAT ITEM - I guess the word from
5 options.
How fucking thick are you David?
you all just twist everything into the exact opposite!
I've had enough, you're all brutally stupid and or dishonest.
Herc
Graham Cooper
you're like random skeptics cliches arguments spouting out in a
fountain.
you can't make a point and stick to it.
you refuse to do the objective test and whine 20 posts running I don't
have an objective proof.
nothing I can do to appease the skeptics bullshitters.
Herc
DavidW
I tried to do an objective test but you didn't respond. You complained about
"idiots interrupting" so it isn't going to work.
Still waiting for a response to:
I'm thinking of a word!
Page 153 Line 18
Graham Cooper
this is subjective!
if you claim
WHY IS CURRY DELICIOUS
THE FIRE
FEAR
TO COMPENSATE THE FLAMES GREW IN SIZE
are both FAILS
then there's no point!
Not one person even suspects there may be a link between the channels
and what they were thinking after 10 years of trying!
Nice God isn't your thing usenet! just wait for angry God and you'll
be convinced aha ha
Herc
Government Shill #2
Oh my!
Name calling! What shall I do?
Government Shill #2
Excellent!
Shill #2
--
Pay Section
Disinformation Directorate
Ministry of Information
Antipodean Division
Clocky
Well, stop drinking and get to it!
Clocky
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:09:58 +0800, "Clocky" <not...@happen.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 12, 5:57 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:15:34 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper
>>>
>>> <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm son of God you dumbwad
>>>
>>>> practically every power in every magic novel I can do.
>>>
>>>> don't blame me if you spend 10 years asking me what's in your
>>>> pocket.
>>>
>>>> you mortals are infinitely more stupid than you realise!
>>>
>>> http://www.schizophrenia.com/earlysigns.htm
>>>
>>> Examples of Delusions----
>>> [Among t]he most common type of delusion or false beliefs are
>>> paranoid delusions. These are persecutory in nature and take many
>>> forms: <snip>
>>> --Religious delusions- that you are Jesus, God, a prophet, or the
>>> antichrist.
>>>
>>> http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_sounds/hg/looney.wav
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Spot the hypocrites always demanding objective deductions then
>> resorting to convenient inferences!
>>
>> Considering all your supposed self-evident powers, how come there is
>> nobody in the world that has witnessed any of them.
>>
>> Have you considered that they are just delusions?
>
>
> and the son of god's words, so that I can tell who said what?
> Anything. A couple of **'s?
>
Yeah OE qoutefix locked up so I terminated it. Forgot to restart it.
Should be fixed now I hope.
Clocky
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:11:37 +1000, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided>
> wrote:
>
>> Government Shill #2 wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:09:58 +0800, "Clocky" <not...@happen.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Spot the hypocrites always demanding objective deductions then
>>>> resorting to convenient inferences!
>>>>
>>>> Considering all your supposed self-evident powers, how come there
>>>> is nobody in the world that has witnessed any of them.
>>>>
>>>> Have you considered that they are just delusions?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hey Clocky. Could you do me a favour and put something between
>>> your's and the son of god's words, so that I can tell who said what?
>>> Anything. A couple of **'s?
>>
>> Clocky needs:
>> http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
>>
>> I've been using it for years.
>
> Excellent!
>
> Shill #2
I've been using it for years too, see my other post for the explanation :-)
Clocky
> On Jul 13, 8:29 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:
>> "Graham Cooper" <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:eef4e498-cf41-4d58...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jul 13, 6:39 am, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 13, 3:13 am, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> So the son of God is a chubby, mumbling lunatic?
>>
>>> And according to their bable been dead for 2000 years...
>>> Obese bones gonna walk around
>>
>> Does this look OBESE to you?
>>
>> http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
>>
>> I can't shop for food or train without the Truman Company amping up
>> the sonic torture.
>>
>> The eyes have it, scary.
>>
>> You look like one of those plackard waving lunatics that sleeps
>> under the bridge
>
>
> Lol! the girls love my big eyes, not as much as my fan club when I
> was younger!
>
> .
>
> SKEPTICS - Let's test if you can answer a question blind!
>
> SILENT - Why is curry delicious?
>
> BLIND - The Fire
>
> Clocky - Fail, because not all curry is hot!
>
> Skeptic logic at it's finest!
>
You're being dishonest again. Not only are most curries not hot, Peter
prefers his mild so your answer that it's fire is what makes lamb curry
delicious to him is just plain wrong. That's a double fail!
Clocky
Your answer was wrong, plain and simple.
Clocky
Correct. Now you're getting it!
>
> then there's no point!
Correct again!
> Not one person even suspects there may be a link between the channels
> and what they were thinking after 10 years of trying!
The link only exists in your schizophrenic mind, not for those hoping for
the answers you promise you will give.
> Nice God isn't your thing usenet! just wait for angry God and you'll
> be convinced aha ha
Can't fear what doesn't exist.
Graham Cooper
Jesus you have sap for brains you cocksucker idiot
Herc
Alex
Score from judges: 2/10 - evil laugh needs further work.
>> Can't fear what doesn't exist.
>
> Jesus you have sap for brains you cocksucker idiot
Ouch. You really don't think much of Jesus, do you?
Alex.
--
> You're a fucking c*&t Alex, you're number 1 on my TODO LIST
>
> I'M GOING TO FIND YOU IN PERSON - GUARANTEED
- Graham Cooper AKA GENESIS ADAM in AUS.TV
Clocky
What did Jesus do to you to deserve that spray?
Government Shill #2
Cool!
Thanks.
Government Shill #2
Lookout Clocky!
He's calling you names!
Whatever shall you do?
Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman
Government Shill #2
Sibling rivalry.
Shill #2
--
"When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When
many people suffer from a delusion, it is called Religion."
Robert M. Pirsig
Graham Cooper
> On 13 Jul 2011 19:56:37 +1000, Alex <n...@leng.id.au> wrote:
Lol!
If Jesus had 2 kids as suggested in The Davinci Code, and each
generation had 2 kids 25 years apart.
Year AD No. of descendants of Jesus
25 2
50 4
75 8
100 16
125 32
150 64
175 128
200 256
225 512
250 1024
275 2000
300 4000
325 8000
350 16000
375 32000
400 64000
425 128000
450 256000
475 512000
500 AD 1,000,000
...
1000 AD 1,000,000,000,000
2000 AD 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 descendants
Population of Earth is only 7,000,000,000 people
So basically all of us have a few DNA strands from Jesus himself,
brother!
Herc
Clocky
No probs, thanks for reminding me :-)
BDK
3006fb...@y13g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, graham...@gmail.com
says...
Why dont you "strike him down", Son of Gawd?
--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!
BDK
@p12g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, graham...@gmail.com says...
Your thinking about DNA is as deranged as your thinking
about....everything else.
Kelsey Bjarnason
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:08:42 -0700, Graham Cooper wrote:
> Peter didn't ask WHAT AM I THINKING OF?
>
> He asked WHY IS L. C. DELICIOUS?
>
> THE FIRE!
>
> It doesn't matter if I give a perfect 1,000,000:1 exactly right answer
> like that, you will always call it tenuous at best because you are all
> utter fucking morons.
Actually, we call it "tenuous at best" because that's what it is. What
makes lamb curry delicious? The combination of spices, the flavour of
the meat, personal and cultural traditions and a host of other factors.
"Fire" is not such a factor. There is no fire in curry; there is spice.
There may be no fire in making a curry, it may be made on an electric
stove. There may be no fire in the sense of "zing", if it is mild. Yet
despite this, it may well still be delicious... so "fire" is a completely
worthless answer - and wasn't there some other bizarre nonsense included,
something about a duck?
Your notions of an "exactly right answer" appear to mean any answer which
has absolutely no bearing upon the question. "Why is Graham Cooper such
a twerp?" "Because bluegrass is green, when played on a flute."
Oh, yes, another of those exactly right answers, the ones which have
absolutely nothing to do with the question.
You wonder why people think you're a loon. It's because you *are* a loon.
george
> "Graham Cooper" <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:eef4e498-cf41-4d58...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 13, 6:39 am, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 13, 3:13 am, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>
> > > So the son of God is a chubby, mumbling lunatic?
>
> > And according to their bable been dead for 2000 years...
> > Obese bones gonna walk around
>
> Does this look OBESE to you?
>
> http://hercshome.com/GrayJuly2001.jpg
The photo comes from 2001.
That's before the 10 years of evident gluttony
george
He hung out with 12 men...
You might like to take that wee fact into consideration...
Graham Cooper
> What
> makes lamb curry delicious? The combination of spices, the flavour of
> the meat, personal and cultural traditions and a host of other factors.
>
> "Fire" is not such a factor. There is no fire in curry;
You guys are ridiculous! What's the answer to
WHY IS MEAT FLAVOURSOME?
THE FLAVOUR OF THE MEAT?
> Your notions of an "exactly right answer" appear to be
EXACTLY RIGHT!
My Remote Viewing of the word FEAR was perfect too!
FEAR = to compensate the flames grew
(i.e. growing alarm to a threat = FEAR)
None of you skeptics are even THINKING about the answers.
OK you seem to agree THE FIRE is pretty good otherwise 10 people would
NOT make arguments against how it was spot on!
This is NOT the paranormal test folks - this is merely
ANY TIME YOU WANTED TO SEE SUPERNATURAL THAT'L ALL THAT'S REQUIRED
If none of you can correctly logically hypothesise possible reasons
for the good answers though it's a waste of time.
None of you claim the answers are a simple match - we cannot proceed
to an objective test where I guess your secret word outright
Herc
Government Shill #2
Uh, no we don't. But I am perfectly happy with the strands of DNA I have which
are identical to gorilla DNA. How about you?
Graham Cooper
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:21:55 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper
>
>
>
NO, the favorite word of the Skeptic and Feminist alike!
Why did the feminist motel owner go out of business?
She left on the neon flashing NO!
Herc
DavidW
You're slithering out of a simple objective test that _you_ suggested.
Graham Cooper
> On Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:20:27 AM UTC+10, Graham Cooper wrote:
-----
I am constantly correcting skeptics lies lies and more lies. for 10
years!
I am the MEDIUM, I have no conscious part in the outcome of what the
channel is.
I can help describe it after you give you question/word if you don't
get it, as can anyone. I can match it to the words from a list of
options afterwards, as can anyone.
YOU decide the quote line and page.
It's not that difficult of a concept! Like YOU would shuffle the
TAROT deck and therefore determine the outcome of the cards.
David is constantly repeating the same lie - I have not done his
SUBJECTIVE demo because I already did 2 perfect subjective channels
and you all baulked.
CURRY = THE FIRE
FEAR = compensate with increasing flames
Live in front of you all, I blind answered THE FIRE is the reason
curry is delicious when the former president of Australian Skeptics
tested if I could read his mind what his question was and answer it.
If you all play dumb in denial there is no going forward! Case
closed! I have $20 million a year income and 500,000 online strippers
in my employ to compensate for you all stomping on my religion.
Herc
www.CamGirls.com
Clocky
> On Jul 14, 4:37 am, Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What
>> makes lamb curry delicious? The combination of spices, the flavour of
>> the meat, personal and cultural traditions and a host of other
>> factors.
>>
>> "Fire" is not such a factor. There is no fire in curry;
>
>
> You guys are ridiculous! What's the answer to
>
> WHY IS MEAT FLAVOURSOME?
>
> THE FLAVOUR OF THE MEAT?
>
>
>
>
>> Your notions of an "exactly right answer" appear to be
>
>
> EXACTLY RIGHT!
>
>
> My Remote Viewing of the word FEAR was perfect too!
>
> FEAR = to compensate the flames grew
>
> (i.e. growing alarm to a threat = FEAR)
>
>
> None of you skeptics are even THINKING about the answers.
>
> OK you seem to agree THE FIRE is pretty good otherwise 10 people would
> NOT make arguments against how it was spot on!
Nobody agrees with you so that means your answer must be spot on?
You're a lunatic and a fucking moron!
Graham Cooper
"please believe us" says the lying skeptics!
Herc
DavidW
Herc, it's not subjective for me to think of a word and you to tell me what it
is. You either guess the right word or you don't.
> CURRY = THE FIRE
>
> FEAR = compensate with increasing flames
>
> Live in front of you all, I blind answered THE FIRE is the reason
> curry is delicious
First you invent chicken so you can associate it with duck. Now you conveniently
leave the star ingredient out of lamb curry - the lamb - so you can pretend that
fire is the right answer.
Alex
> closed! I have $20 million a year income and 500,000 online strippers
> in my employ to compensate for you all stomping on my religion.
Imagine if you really had any of those things.
What happens on the odd occasions when you turn the computer or mobile
device off and your fantasy world on Usenet disappears?
Graham Cooper
We have to do 3, 4, or 5 channels 3, 4 or 5 days running to allow me
to make an objective guess.
My hit rate would be too low to effectively guess the word (from
10,000 dictionary words) given just the remote viewing of the word.
How you cannot remember the difference between a 1 channel SUBJECTIVE
demo and a 1 Week long objective test is beyond me.
You only did the SUBJECTIVE part, I'm not going to guess your word
outright given what you have done so far.
>
> > CURRY = THE FIRE
>
> > FEAR = compensate with increasing flames
>
> > Live in front of you all, I blind answered THE FIRE is the reason
> > curry is delicious
>
> First you invent chicken so you can associate it with duck. Now you conveniently
> leave the star ingredient out of lamb curry - the lamb - so you can pretend that
> fire is the right answer.
You all baulked at the channel and asked me to explain it.
THE FIRE is an intelligent sounding response to the question Why is
lamb curry delicious?
I don't know why you're all so adamant in lying about such an obvious
fact.
Herc
Graham Cooper
> In aus.tv Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > If you all play dumb in denial there is no going forward! Case
> > closed! I have $20 million a year income and 500,000 online strippers
> > in my employ to compensate for you all stomping on my religion.
>
> Imagine if you really had any of those things.
>
> What happens on the odd occasions when you turn the computer or mobile
> device off and your fantasy world on Usenet disappears?
The Truman Company interrogates me (direct to my mind) when I'm
offline. Round the clock same half dozen yanky interrogators for 10
years non stop.
I have not been allowed 1 second rest in 10 years now of constant
sonic torture including 1 million verbal assaults, constant mind
broadcasting draining my thoughts, blocking me from using my memory or
any relaxed thoughts for 10 years. They also implant ideas into
everyone in my audio range to verbally assault me. Longest most
deranged torture session in modern history, but hey conspiracy
theories are all thought up by loonies so just do nothing K?
Herc
DavidW
> On Jul 14, 8:56 am, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> David is constantly repeating the same lie - I have not done his
>>> SUBJECTIVE demo because I already did 2 perfect subjective channels
>>> and you all baulked.
>>
>> Herc, it's not subjective for me to think of a word and you to tell
>> me what it is. You either guess the right word or you don't.
>
>
> We have to do 3, 4, or 5 channels 3, 4 or 5 days running to allow me
> to make an objective guess.
>
> My hit rate would be too low to effectively guess the word (from
> 10,000 dictionary words) given just the remote viewing of the word.
Only 10,000? My word was STROMUHR, the winning word in the 2010 U.S. National
Spelling Bee.
> How you cannot remember the difference between a 1 channel SUBJECTIVE
> demo and a 1 Week long objective test is beyond me.
Herc, given the high throughput of paranormal threads and posts I don't keep up
with all the procedures. It's news to me that an objective test is more involved
than a subjective one. You were the one who invited people to participate in a
simple, objective, single-word guessing test.
> You only did the SUBJECTIVE part, I'm not going to guess your word
> outright given what you have done so far.
To summarize: Your paranormal mindreading ability is pretty useless.
>>
>>> CURRY = THE FIRE
>>
>>> FEAR = compensate with increasing flames
>>
>>> Live in front of you all, I blind answered THE FIRE is the reason
>>> curry is delicious
>>
>> First you invent chicken so you can associate it with duck. Now you
>> conveniently leave the star ingredient out of lamb curry - the lamb
>> - so you can pretend that fire is the right answer.
>
>
> You all baulked at the channel and asked me to explain it.
>
> THE FIRE is an intelligent sounding response to the question Why is
> lamb curry delicious?
No it is not. There is a only tenuous connection between CURRY and FIRE, which
you seem to regard as "exactly right".
> I don't know why you're all so adamant in lying about such an obvious
> fact.
If you ask anyone why they think lamb curry is delicious do you think they'll
answer THE FIRE? Of course not.
Graham Cooper
> > THE FIRE is an intelligent sounding response to the question Why is
> > lamb curry delicious?
>
> No it is not. There is a only tenuous connection between CURRY and FIRE, which
> you seem to regard as "exactly right".
>
> > I don't know why you're all so adamant in lying about such an obvious
> > fact.
>
> If you ask anyone why they think lamb curry is delicious do you think they'll
> answer THE FIRE? Of course not.
Well no wonder you cannot see any of the answers as a match.
I got
THE FIRE
and
UNGAINLY
in the one line about lamb curry.
If you think it's nothing then no point continuing!
75% of people on the web claim it's a HELPFUL MATCH but 100% of
skeptics claim it's COMPLETELY UNRELATED!
Now you have your Control figure from skeptics! 0% of phrases match
any questions!
Herc
DavidW
> On Jul 14, 9:50 am, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>> THE FIRE is an intelligent sounding response to the question Why is
>>> lamb curry delicious?
>>
>> No it is not. There is a only tenuous connection between CURRY and
>> FIRE, which you seem to regard as "exactly right".
>>
>>> I don't know why you're all so adamant in lying about such an
>>> obvious fact.
>>
>> If you ask anyone why they think lamb curry is delicious do you
>> think they'll answer THE FIRE? Of course not.
>
>
> Well no wonder you cannot see any of the answers as a match.
>
> I got
>
> THE FIRE
>
> and
>
> UNGAINLY
>
> in the one line about lamb curry.
What's ungainly about lamb curry?
> If you think it's nothing then no point continuing!
>
> 75% of people on the web claim it's a HELPFUL MATCH
Meaningless without a control group.
> but 100% of
> skeptics claim it's COMPLETELY UNRELATED!
I never said it's nothing or completely unrelated. It's just nowhere near good
enough. Is this the limit of paranormal mindreading? Some word somewhere that
has some vague connection to some aspect of the question? Is that what you've
been making all this fuss about with countless threads and posts and abuse and
tests and rule changes? Is THE FIRE as an answer to why lamb curry is delicious
really as good as it gets after ten years' of effort?
Richard Cornford
> On Jul 14, 9:50 am, DavidW wrote:
>>> THE FIRE is an intelligent sounding response to the question
>>> Why is lamb curry delicious?
>>
>> No it is not. There is a only tenuous connection between CURRY
>> and FIRE, which you seem to regard as "exactly right".
>>
>>> I don't know why you're all so adamant in lying about such an
>>> obvious fact.
>>
>> If you ask anyone why they think lamb curry is delicious do you
>> think they'll answer THE FIRE? Of course not.
>
>
> Well no wonder you cannot see any of the answers as a match.
>
> I got
>
> THE FIRE
>
> and
>
> UNGAINLY
And what exactly does "ungainly" have to do with the deliciousness of
lamb curry?
> in the one line about lamb curry.
That really should read 'in one line selected from a book', as whether
or not a phrase containing the words "fire" and "ungainly" can be said
to be "about lamb curry" certainly is being disputed here, and would
normally be decided based mostly on which other words, and in which
order, that phrase contained.
But in any event, being "about lamb curry" would be inappropriate in
context as what the response should have been about is/are the cause(s)
of the deliciousness of lamb curry (lamb curry being the one thing that
cannot be responsible for the deliciousness of lam curry).
> If you think it's nothing then no point continuing!
>
> 75% of people on the web claim it's a HELPFUL MATCH
Your sample, assuming that exists and is accurately reported, is
unlikely to be representative of "people on the web".
> but 100% of
> skeptics claim it's COMPLETELY UNRELATED!
No, the assertion that is being repeated is that any relation that may
exists is extremely tenuous. Indeed so tenuous that such week/indirect
relationships are likely to be a common coincidences when picking any
one of four words ("why", "lamb", "curry" or "delicious") and trying to
draw a connection with some/any aspect of a random line from a book.
> Now you have your Control figure from skeptics! 0% of phrases
> match any questions!
Not when what you call a "match" is so indirect and tenuous that it is
necessary to re-word one of the subjects of the "match" to pry out a
better 'fit' (the chicken<->ducked 'relationship') and then perform a
repeated reformulation of the 'rationale' to recover what little
relationship remains. With a match of that sort the proportion of
possible phrases that will "match" becomes quite high.
Graham Cooper
You asked a tedious question and got the perfect response most people
would post a similar theme about it being hot.
It's easy to mock God and the son of God when you've only asked 2
genuine questions of interest in 10 years.
Hey if you don't want to help out Adam see Eve again then that's that!
I'm not going to continually correct the mob of liars here, just go to
hell all of you!
Herc
Graham Cooper
wrote:
> Not when what you call a "match" is so indirect and tenuous that it is
> necessary to re-word one of the subjects of the "match" to pry out a
> better 'fit' (the chicken<->ducked 'relationship') and then perform a
> repeated reformulation of the 'rationale' to recover what little
> relationship remains. With a match of that sort the proportion of
> possible phrases that will "match" becomes quite high.
I've stated 10 times that you all baulked at the answer first.
YOU IGNORE THE ANSWER 'THE FIRE...' AND THEN ASK ME TO EXPLAIN IT!
SO THAT YOU CAN BLAME MY MORE INDEPTH EXPLANATION AS IRRATIONAL.
You lose so you take another shot!
No different to the paranormal application - just describe in a few
lines what it is you can do?
Then you complain it doesn't DETAIL what I can do, then you complain
about the details and specifics because ANY high level details about
paranormal is by definition insane! Then you go back to saying I
never described what it is I can do that's paranormal!
This conversation is over - if you all say the answer is entirely
expected random then I stand by my claim...
ALL SKEPTICS ARE FULL OF SHIT!
Herc
DavidW
> On Jul 14, 10:54 am, "Richard Cornford" <Rich...@litotes.demon.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Not when what you call a "match" is so indirect and tenuous that it
>> is necessary to re-word one of the subjects of the "match" to pry
>> out a better 'fit' (the chicken<->ducked 'relationship') and then
>> perform a repeated reformulation of the 'rationale' to recover what
>> little relationship remains. With a match of that sort the
>> proportion of possible phrases that will "match" becomes quite high.
>
> I've stated 10 times that you all baulked at the answer first.
>
> YOU IGNORE THE ANSWER 'THE FIRE...' AND THEN ASK ME TO EXPLAIN IT!
I don't know if anyone asked you to explain it. It's clear enough that it didn't
answer the question so everyone simply rejected it.
> SO THAT YOU CAN BLAME MY MORE INDEPTH EXPLANATION AS IRRATIONAL.
I haven't seen any "indepth explanation", but don't bother; "THE FIRE" can't be
saved.
> You lose so you take another shot!
>
> No different to the paranormal application - just describe in a few
> lines what it is you can do?
>
> Then you complain it doesn't DETAIL what I can do, then you complain
> about the details and specifics because ANY high level details about
> paranormal is by definition insane! Then you go back to saying I
> never described what it is I can do that's paranormal!
I also don't remember anyone demanding details or specifics. They simply want
you to pass a simple and objective mindreading test that isn't abandoned after
it's barely started or interrupted by rules changes or abuse and won't take
months to complete.
BDK
@m3g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, graham...@gmail.com says...
>
> On Jul 14, 9:13ï¿œam, Alex <n...@leng.id.au> wrote:
> > In aus.tv Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > closed! ï¿œI have $20 million a year income and 500,000 online strippers
> > > in my employ to compensate for you all stomping on my religion.
> >
> > Imagine if you really had any of those things.
> >
> > What happens on the odd occasions when you turn the computer or mobile
> > device off and your fantasy world on Usenet disappears?
>
>
> The Truman Company interrogates me (direct to my mind) when I'm
> offline. Round the clock same half dozen yanky interrogators for 10
> years non stop.
>
> I have not been allowed 1 second rest in 10 years now of constant
> sonic torture including 1 million verbal assaults, constant mind
> broadcasting draining my thoughts, blocking me from using my memory or
> any relaxed thoughts for 10 years. They also implant ideas into
> everyone in my audio range to verbally assault me. Longest most
> deranged torture session in modern history, but hey conspiracy
> theories are all thought up by loonies so just do nothing K?
>
> Herc
Wow, you're even more deranged than I thought.
Graham Cooper
100% of skeptics says THE FIRE is not a reason why curry is delicious.
75% of over 1000 participants at MindReading.com said their answers I
gave blind were HELPFUL or RELATED. The 3rd option was NO MATCH only
25% of people selected that.
If you all play the die hard skeptic and argue every point against me
then there will be no objective test.
I tried doing it with the die hard skeptic Brad and 75% of his posts
were abusive unfounded slander or stuffing around with the channels.
If you lie to my face that THE FIRE is not a near perfect response
then fuck you you bunch of assholes! Live your heathen lives - I own
a billion dollar domain I can prove supernatural any day of the week
to anyone in the world. You're all thick in the skull outright
abusive full on liars every single post out of every single one of
you.
Herc
Graham Cooper
> In article <4085e8ad-f2dd-4f9b-96d5-df5cef09b555
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 9:13 am, Alex <n...@leng.id.au> wrote:
> > > In aus.tv Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > closed! I have $20 million a year income and 500,000 online strippers
> > > > in my employ to compensate for you all stomping on my religion.
>
> > > Imagine if you really had any of those things.
>
> > > What happens on the odd occasions when you turn the computer or mobile
> > > device off and your fantasy world on Usenet disappears?
>
> > The Truman Company interrogates me (direct to my mind) when I'm
> > offline. Round the clock same half dozen yanky interrogators for 10
> > years non stop.
>
> > I have not been allowed 1 second rest in 10 years now of constant
> > sonic torture including 1 million verbal assaults, constant mind
> > broadcasting draining my thoughts, blocking me from using my memory or
> > any relaxed thoughts for 10 years. They also implant ideas into
> > everyone in my audio range to verbally assault me. Longest most
> > deranged torture session in modern history, but hey conspiracy
> > theories are all thought up by loonies so just do nothing K?
>
> > Herc
>
> Wow, you're even more deranged than I thought.
>
Again?
Herc
Graham Cooper
> you to pass a simple and objective mindreading test that isn't abandoned after
> it's barely started or interrupted by rules changes or abuse and won't take
> months to complete.
I did that! Followed the protocol to the letter, beat a two horse
race odds - even money and you all cried for months.
.
Skeptics..... I'll go so far as to agree my Blind Channel Line
THE FIRE WENT DOWN, ELI DUCKED UNDER AN UNGAINLY SWIPE
is a TENUOUS connection to the deliciousness of lamb curry.
But if you merely take the first words of the channel...
THE FIRE is an apt answer! NO DOUBT ABOUT IT!
NOT TENUOUS IN THE LEAST!
NOT A FAIL IN THE LEAST!
NOT TOO BAD IN THE LEAST!
Good enough for me to guess from 4 options which is all I need!
I could spot that quote from 100 random quotes as matching lamb
curry! Hmmmmm
Herc
DavidW
Because they liked the bible readings. No control group so results are
meaningless.
> The 3rd option was NO MATCH only
> 25% of people selected that.
And?
> If you all play the die hard skeptic and argue every point against me
> then there will be no objective test.
Sceptics are doing no more than applying rigorous scientific method to your
results.
> I tried doing it with the die hard skeptic Brad and 75% of his posts
> were abusive unfounded slander or stuffing around with the channels.
I don't know about that. Brad usually seems pretty mild-mannered to me. Remember
that anyone participating in these tests has to endure a lot of abuse from you
along the way, but you expect them to remain courteous and polite throughout?