I'm thinking of a word!
Page 123 Line 23
-------------------------
(select from page 1..300, line 1..30)
That's it! I can remote view the item with a line out of a book.
BLODDY SIMPLE AY!
Herc
**LOL**
Herc
Well, who is an acceptable chump for this test if not me?
You'll have to wait - Graham is still thinking up the
additions to the rules in the original post now that someone
has accepted.
Wait for it...
Alex.
Just warming up, try again, new word, new numbers! (in range this
time)
Herc
OK, sorry, out of range.
I'm thinking of a word!
Page 153 Line 18
>I'm thinking of a word!
>Page 279 Line 71
PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THE IDIOT HERC!
OK 1 more rule, no idiots interrupting.
guess this isn't going to work at all then.
Herc
>On Jul 8, 11:50 am, Someone Else <sumwunelse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:48:14 +1000, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> >I'm thinking of a word!
>> >Page 279 Line 71
>>
>> PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THE IDIOT HERC!
>
>OK 1 more rule, no idiots interrupting.
The rule we need is no annoying lying deluded schizophrenic pests
allowed to start posts in the first place.....
>guess this isn't going to work at all then.
Not unless someone has the good sense to have you committed.
BTW, those numbers are valid. They are equivalent to Page 281 Line 11.
>I'm thinking of a word.
What do gay horses eat?
Haaaaaaaaaaaaay....
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
You are, indeed, a mentally ill huckster.
I'm sure requesting common decency is out of kilter with you mob of
sheep fuckers
>POST TO ME
Not very useful, even if true.
Actually, pretty pathetic for the son of god.
How about parting some seas, or turning the water in my pool into Jim Beam and
Coke?
Shill #2
--
"When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When
many people suffer from a delusion, it is called Religion."
Robert M. Pirsig
Well infinite knowledge didn't impress you either because of
*SUBJECTIVENESS*
Either useful or probabilistic objective proof, no breaking any laws
of physics
Herc
>On Jul 8, 4:34 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:43:57 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >POST TO ME
>>
>> >I'm thinking of a word!
>> >Page 123 Line 23
>>
>> >-------------------------
>>
>> >(select from page 1..300, line 1..30)
>>
>> >That's it! I can remote view the item with a line out of a book.
>>
>> >BLODDY SIMPLE AY!
>>
>> Not very useful, even if true.
>>
>> Actually, pretty pathetic for the son of god.
>>
>> How about parting some seas, or turning the water in my pool into Jim Beam and
>> Coke?
>>
>
>
>Well infinite knowledge didn't impress you either because of
>*SUBJECTIVENESS*
Infinite knowledge?
What lake did I live next to this time last year, oh infinite one?
Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman
It never has in the past.
100% of knowledge - 1% of trivial facts we already know.
For 10 years everybody selects a stupid question from the 1% they
already know!
How many times are you skeptics going to make this idiotic argument of
not even bothering to ask the Oracle anything of interest! another
5000 times?
Take a leap of faith and ask something you don't know!
Herc
>> Infinite knowledge?
>>
>> What lake did I live next to this time last year, oh infinite one?
>>
>
>100% of knowledge - 1% of trivial facts we already know.
>
>For 10 years everybody selects a stupid question from the 1% they
>already know!
>
>How many times are you skeptics going to make this idiotic argument of
>not even bothering to ask the Oracle anything of interest! another
>5000 times?
>
>Take a leap of faith and ask something you don't know!
The same old pathetic excuse for your failure to perform every time.
and how many 100s of times have you posted the same drivel at me?
Herc
And you STILL haven't got it through your thick head that you're a
self-deluded nobody with a mental problem?
>On Jul 8, 5:08 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 23:50:52 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jul 8, 4:34 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:43:57 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >POST TO ME
>>
>> >> >I'm thinking of a word!
>> >> >Page 123 Line 23
>>
>> >> >-------------------------
>>
>> >> >(select from page 1..300, line 1..30)
>>
>> >> >That's it! I can remote view the item with a line out of a book.
>>
>> >> >BLODDY SIMPLE AY!
>>
>> >> Not very useful, even if true.
>>
>> >> Actually, pretty pathetic for the son of god.
>>
>> >> How about parting some seas, or turning the water in my pool into Jim Beam and
>> >> Coke?
>>
>> >Well infinite knowledge didn't impress you either because of
>> >*SUBJECTIVENESS*
>>
>> Infinite knowledge?
>>
>> What lake did I live next to this time last year, oh infinite one?
>>
>
>100% of knowledge - 1% of trivial facts we already know.
Well then... If it's a fact you already know, it should be easy.
Off you go!
I would be thrilled to see him actually stop mumbling. That would be
impressive. The son of god shouldn't be on the chubby side either,
should he?
--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!
Page 95, line 2, third word. What is is? It's in italics.
--
jw
>POST TO ME
>
>I'm thinking of a word!
>Page 123 Line 23
>
>-------------------------
>
>(select from page 1..300, line 1..30)
OK.
Page 109, line 12.
What's the word?
>That's it! I can remote view the item with a line out of a book.
Then do so.
>BLODDY SIMPLE AY!
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
p95
1 he blasted me with holy fire when the seraphs caught me. Dead
2 in a HEARTBEAT.
Herc
Well, it does compensate for not being able to pick up chicks. He has his own
boobs to play with.
Shill #2
--
Cleavage. The one thing you can approve of whilst simultaneously looking down
upon.
Yeh, Shill, Clocky, BDK, Alexis, Raven, JessHC, Terry, Dingo..
my own boobs to play with ^^^
Personally I'd rather have Disciples but atleast I get to test out my
weaponry soon.
Herc
Yet you insist that you're the one that has been played for the last ten
years and it's in your name anyway so you can't escape it.
Graham Cooper
Greatest Manboober
Failed Trooper
Making Blooper
> Personally I'd rather have Disciples but atleast I get to test out my
> weaponry soon.
>
What sort of weapons and is that a threat?
So the word is "heartbeat" according to you, OK locked in.
No squirming out of it this time.
Better than none at all! That's what you'd have if you were in shape.
>
> Personally I'd rather have Disciples but atleast I get to test out my
> weaponry soon.
>
> Herc
And then the nice men in the white jackets will come and strap you face
down onto a stretcher and give you a nice big shot of "happy juice", and
then you'll go for a nice ride to a magical place where you can
fantacize to your heart's content, and probably scream all you want to
too.
Graham, I have to hand it to you. You have guessed correctly.
My questions were all things I really wanted to know the answer to,
and did not already know. You had different excuses, but were utterly
unable to answer. Someone (raven?) asked you his VIN, which he did
not know but could readily check, and you claimed you could determine
it magically but found various excuses for not even getting part of it
right. You've completely failed time and time again to answer *any*
of the questions people ask, whether they follow your ever-changing
protocols or not. You still haven't provided any answers to my two
latest questions, one of which I could tell you the correct answer
to. How about a new one. I don't know the answer to this one, but I
can check it soon. Initials
OwdwiaatBRP? Page 242, line 18. It isn't a yes/no question, but you
never give a yes/no answer anyway, and you leave that requirement out
of most of your claims. Or, for a yes/no question, initials
WIsAomt? Page 88, line 12.
> How many times are you skeptics going to make this idiotic argument of
> not even bothering to ask the Oracle anything of interest! another
> 5000 times?
>
> Take a leap of faith and ask something you don't know!
Again? Just like I've done so many times already and had you fail to
answer? OK, see above. I've asked you two new questions.
P. 48, line 1 please.
Mark L. Fergerson
**to compensate, the flames grew in size from basketball**
Herc
P. 48 of my 1880 American Book Exchange edition of George Sale's
translation of the Koran begins Chapter four (today called "Sura
four" and hilariously indicated as Roman numerals IV). The first four
lines of text on the page are as follows:
CHAPTER IV
ENTITLED WOMEN; REVEALED AT MEDINA.
IN THE NAME OF THE MOST MERCIFUL GOD.
"O men, fear your lord, who hath created you out of one man, and"
That last line I consider to be the first line on the page. You may
quibble if you wish, but I see no correlation between what you wrote
and what's on the page.
Mark L. Fergerson
different books perhaps?
the line number is for ME to use to answer your question, describe
your word.
YOU have to think of something of genuine interest (not just for test
purposes)
I guess the OP wasn't that simple then!
> POST TO ME
> I'm thinking of a word!
> Page 123 Line 23
> -------------------------
> (select from page 1..300, line 1..30)
> That's it! I can remote view the item with a line out of a book.
> BLODDY SIMPLE AY!
Herc
Meaning what? That's the book I have on hand. Many other editions of
the same translations use the same pagination etc.
I have to tell you what book, which edition, etc. beforehand? Kinda
takes the "remote viewing" out of it.
> the line number is for ME to use to answer your question, describe
> your word.
My word was "fear".
> YOU have to think of something of genuine interest (not just for test
> purposes)
Fear is of interest to most sane people.
Seems to me I met your conditions. If you think I didn't, you need
to be more specific in your claims.
Mark L. Fergerson
Misunderstanding here!
YOU DON'T LOOKUP ANY BOOK!
YOU POST
I AM THINKING OF A WORD
PAGE 123 LINE 23
If your word was FEAR, my remote viewing of your word was
*to compensate, the flames grew in size**
Classic Fear reaction?
increasing anger to deal with a threat!
I won't ask if you GET IT because you all lie anyway
Herc
must be nice to have so much useless time on your hands. Really?
No job? No responsibilities, just a huge waste of time, just how
you like it. God forbid you have extra-ordinary responsiblities you
are ignoring. Got a wife, got children (Hope not, you're pretty much
all about you.) Got a point, got a message? Nothing smart
going on, nothing serious. Just scary---sort of Casey Anthony-
level of regard of life.
Yes Maam!
I'm trying to prove myself to Eve since you Apes crapped all over Eden
and scared her away for 13 years now
Funny you skeptics demand the truth and proof for 50 odd years now!
Then get a rabbit in your throat when I give you proof!
http://photosofclouds.com/neverending-story.jpg
Let me guess... it's a teapot!
http://photosofclouds.com/MOONHEART_lovers.jpg
http://photosofclouds.com/MOONHEART%20IMG_0552-girl-on-top.JPG
Herc
No idea of what you speak....no reason why a person should. Thanks
for stopping by.
The line number is NOT to tell you where the word is? What's the
point of giving you a line number then?
> > My word was "fear".
>
> > > YOU have to think of something of genuine interest (not just for test
> > > purposes)
>
> > Fear is of interest to most sane people.
>
> > Seems to me I met your conditions. If you think I didn't, you need
> > to be more specific in your claims.
>
> > Mark L. Fergerson
>
> Misunderstanding here!
That's because your explanations of your "technique" are unclear at
best.
> YOU DON'T LOOKUP ANY BOOK!
YOU CAN STOP YELLING ANY TIME!
If I don't use a particular book I have on hand that contains an
example of the word/question/whatever, what's the point? If I use a
book *you* have in mind, what's the point?
> YOU POST
My, you anger easily.
> I AM THINKING OF A WORD
> PAGE 123 LINE 23
I did that.
> If your word was FEAR, my remote viewing of your word was
>
> *to compensate, the flames grew in size**
>
> Classic Fear reaction?
>
> increasing anger to deal with a threat!
Anger is an alternative to fear, not an effect. See "fight or flight
response".
> I won't ask if you GET IT because you all lie anyway
Ad Hominem attacks don't bolster your case at all.
Your ANGER (as demonstrated by your YELLING), by your own logic, is
due to your feeling threatened. That is not my fault.
If you want others to play your game you must state the rules more
clearly. Otherwise you are painting YOURSELF as just another crackpot.
Mark L. Fergerson
I'll reword the OP slightly.
POST TO ME
"I'm thinking of a word!
Page 123 Line 23"
-------------------------
just think up 2 random numbers for the page from 1..300
and the line from 1..30
That's all you have to do!
I can remote view the word you were thinking of with THAT line out of
MY book.
BLODDY SIMPLE AY!
Herc
Guy had a flat tire and when he went to fasten the new one he found all the
lug nuts were gone.
A voice from a fence behind him suggested taking one lug nut off the other
three tires and this would get him to town.
Turning to thank the man he found he was talking to someone behind the fence
of an insane asylum.
He asked if the man worked there.
"No, I'm an inmate" was the reply.
"Well how did you think of that solution?"
"I may be crazy, but I'm not stupid." replied the inmate.
Herc is mentally ill, but not stupid.
Livvy can't seem to write coherent sentences.
Livvy is just fine, perfectly sane. Wonders why people skew to the
worst...we've all seen it. Oh, look at me, I can present you the
worst news articles, the worst human behavior, ever; the worst world-
wide horror, the worst pets, the worst of anything.....only. Key
word, only. That's all you got? I spent the afternoon with the
family, a production of "Peter Pan". The Mom and Dad of 2 cast-
members are my niece and her husband. In audience, the 2 cast-
members grand-parents, siblings, aunts, uncles,cousins (youngest 3 1/2
months). Really strong, we all work, we see each other often, of
course we are concerned. Your take on life appears to be a tad
Urban Legend-ness. Really? That's all you got, then that's all it
is. Nothing to do with real life of people who live real lives.
Jeez. how exhaustive you are.
> On Jul 17, 2:24 am, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[snip]
>> Livvy can't seem to write coherent sentences.
>
> Livvy is just fine, perfectly sane. Wonders why people skew to the
> worst...we've all seen it. Oh, look at me, I can present you the worst
> news articles, the worst human behavior, ever; the worst world- wide
> horror, the worst pets, the worst of anything.....only. Key word,
> only. That's all you got? I spent the afternoon with the family, a
> production of "Peter Pan". The Mom and Dad of 2 cast- members are my
> niece and her husband. In audience, the 2 cast- members grand-parents,
> siblings, aunts, uncles,cousins (youngest 3 1/2 months). Really strong,
> we all work, we see each other often, of course we are concerned.
> Your take on life appears to be a tad Urban Legend-ness. Really?
> That's all you got, then that's all it is. Nothing to do with real
> life of people who live real lives. Jeez. how exhaustive you are.
LOL, you just proved his point.