On Monday, April 5, 2021 at 8:57:04 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Monday, April 5, 2021 at 6:57:54 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > The "well spoken" quote was a forgery, I didn't write that.
> >> > > >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > But you've admitted that you found him to have been so.
> >> > > >> >> > > >> You quoted a forged post written by an impostor troll, an identity thief.
> >> > > >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> > > >> >> > > >> Why do you misrepresent and lie so much, Michael Pendragon?
> >> > > >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> > > >> >> > > > You had subsequently conceded that you did, in fact, find Zu-Bolton to have been well spoken.
> >> > > >> >> > >
> >> > > >> >> > > Okay, but that still doesn't change the fact that you've been posting forgeries and falsely attributing them to me.
> >> > > >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Now that you've been informed of your mistake, you should stop spreading this false information, Pendragon.
> >> >
> >> > > I didn't refuse peace, but stopping posting was never agreed on... in fact I have always stated that I reserve the right to post as much as circumstances require.
> >> > >
> >> > > You know that, and you know that imposed posting limits are unacceptable for me.
> >> >
> >> > Cutting down your posts was the only thing the "trolls" wanted in return.
> >> Which I did,
> >
> > You cut down
> Yes I did and still post less most days unless it is a busy one.
That simply isn't true, Will.
You made 102 posts the day before yesterday, appear to have hit a similar number yesterday, and seem well on your way to hitting the 100+ mark again today.
> >> and can still continue to do, if allowed.
> >
> >> What I wrote was that if the impersonations and forgery stopped, if the name calling and personal attacks on friends and family stopped, there would be less posts since none of that will need to be corrected.
> >
> > This isn't being disputed, Will.
> >
> > However, when the "impersonations and forgery... name calling and personal attacks on friends and family" stopped for two weeks, neither you nor your sock were able to keep the numbers of your posts down.
> No, you are lying again.
You forgot to mention that my pants were on fire.
> I made less posts and so did Zod.
Learn to read, Will. The operative in my statement is "keep."
You made less posts for 2 days, and your sock followed suit.
However, the truce lasted for 2 weeks, during which you (and your sock) posted excessively for 12 days. IOW, you are unable to *keep* your fingers away from the keyboard for more than two days at a time.
> >> I never claimed I'd stop posting at all, or that my posts would match your imposed limit.
> >
> > You claimed that you rarely make over 25 posts a day, and that the only reason you sometimes do is because the "malicious trolls" force you to "set the record straight."
> That can add dozens of extra posts, of course.
No, Will.
That claim was put to the test. The "malicious trolls" stopped their attacks for 14 days. Your posts remained excessively high for 12 of those 14 days. You are obviously being motivated by something other than the troll posts.
> > I put your claim to the test
> Spin it as you please, He fact remains I posted less during that time.
You posts were counted, and posted, every day. The records show that you did no such thing.
> >> I have always reserved the right to make as many posts as I see fiy yo make, as many as circumstances require.
> >
> > Consequently, the rest of us reserve the right
> Right, nothing has changed.
Correct.
Nothing has changed.
You had been given the opportunity to establish a permanent peace here -- and failed miserably.
Funny how no one was surprised.