I’m still experimenting with the positioning of the tags, we’re lucky in that we organise our own trail races so can trial the timing tags without having to worry about making mistakes.
With the tags on the shoes we found that during our races through water & mud we didn’t have any problems, however there was a tendency for some to snag on heather & low brush-our courses can be pretty testing! We had a good read rate, but after a run in the cold & wet runners want to get dried off, so retrieving tags from muddy shoes & wet athletes presented its own difficulties.
I’ve tried the tags on the bibs-I have some photos which I’ll post up, I put the tags on the front of the bib at the top centre, the tag was kept off the bib with small foam double sided pads in each corner. When the runner came over the line it was a simple matter to pull off the tag & later on replace the pad. Out of 120 runners we lost around 4 or 5 misreads, this could be attributed to misalignment of the antenna-we had them facing down the finish line at a slight angle-or the runner could have hidden the tag with their arm as they stopped their watches.
Tomorrow we’re trying out the tags in our Tufty Trail Race with over 200+ runners, we’re going to put the tags on the side of the shorts & use the antenna to side scan, I’ll let you know how this works & post up some photos.
Cheers Tony
I have used a Dymo printer with thermo labels to place the dogbone on the front of the bib and put the label over it. I do this without having to use foam, plus I get to show them where the RFID chip is and tell them not to mess with it, but most importantly, I get my logo on the bib. BRANDING!!! This has worked for me well, but I am experimenting with a double chip on the back with foam. Not all races are good with a label on the front of the bib.
It seems a number of timers in this group have spent a lot of time and money to make the Agee system work with bib tags even at the risk of being less accurate than Brian’s recommended setup (https://groups.google.com/d/msg/agee-race-timing/3Yi7dW-vADA/F99iMLPl2ccJ). It also appears that the majority of those who mention that they use bib tags do so because their clients request or demand it. I’m getting curiouser and curiouser and have some business questions:
When you go to this trouble and/or expense of buying mat antennas and/or trusses and/or foam backers and so on, have you then raised your rates to cover the additional costs and time you have to put into it?
Do you keep the option of shoe/hip tags and charge a different rate for that?
If a client has requested bib tags, have they given you a reason? For example, is it to make it more convenient for runners, or is it because they think that’s what they are supposed to have? Something in between?
I’ve asked this before and do not recall getting a reply: If you attach chips to bibs, do you then consider them ‘disposable’ or do you request that the runners give them back to you?
Thanks!
Crystal
This may just be for national championships, but as a former coach who won a conference championship and then teo weeks later a regional championship each by 1 point, I would hate to win/lose without precision.
I spoke with Brian in regards to this issue and he did state that this system does adhere to the standard set by whatever agency it needed to be tested by.
Still, in my mind...timing community road races where 90% of participants run just to run is one thing, compared to championship events where more is on the line. It's very hard to argue a picture of the finish over a close chip finish.
Of course anyone can set things up however they would like, and I would encourage everyone to try different setups to see what works for them and what doesn't, I just wanted to post a quick word of caution in case you don't have a chance to test things out before your race on Sunday.