Order of operations & necessity of attenuation correction

43 views
Skip to first unread message

DavidQ

unread,
May 12, 2021, 12:00:10 PM5/12/21
to wradlib-users
Hi all,

I am working with a SRI (Surface Rainfall Intensity). The product comes in dBZ from an Iris radar which seems to work with Z in mm**6/mm**3. In their doc they write

dBZ = 10 log(Z); with Z in mm**6/mm**3,

so I get Z in mm**6/m**3 to convert it to Marshall-Palmer with

data = (1e6)*10**(data/10)

Since it seems that my data has clutters, I apply the Gabella filter now:

data = wrl.clutter.filter_gabella(data, wsize=5, thrsnorain=0., tr1=6., n_p=8, tr2=1.3)

And now I finally obtain the rainfall intensity with the Marshall-Palmer:

data = wrl.zr.z_to_r(data, a=200.0, b=1.6)

My questions are:
1) is this order of operations correct? Should I perhaps apply the filter even before the conversion to m**3?

2) Should I apply some attenuation correction for SRI? If so, where in the process should I apply it? In this recipe https://debug-docs.readthedocs.io/en/test/notebooks/workflow/recipe1.html the attenuation correction is applied just before the Marshall-Palmer correction, in my case would that be after the "filter_gabella"?

Thx.

Syed Hamid Ali

unread,
May 12, 2021, 12:20:57 PM5/12/21
to wradli...@googlegroups.com
First of all dBZ = 10log10(Z), so use
wradlib.trafo.idecibel function of wradlib to convert dBZ to Z(mm⁶/m³)or simply 10**(data/10)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "wradlib-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wradlib-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wradlib-users/324f84f3-a0f5-475e-b394-7ff615f99f06n%40googlegroups.com.

David Quintero

unread,
May 13, 2021, 3:54:56 PM5/13/21
to wradli...@googlegroups.com
Ok, thx. I was confused because I saw mm**6/mm**3 somewhere. (Anyway, the conversion should be with 10**9 as factor), but yes, your conversion was the right one.

On the other hand, it seems SRI comes with some preprocessing in iris sigmet radar and I don't think attenuation correction and cluttering are necessary.

You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "wradlib-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/wradlib-users/sF56eo7DJgA/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to wradlib-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wradlib-users/CADqG3xAuo2pROakCeBQZKfxTWF_9CarUP%3DXOyQ6C_P-vP2-8Yw%40mail.gmail.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages