Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

114 views
Skip to first unread message

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 7, 2017, 6:35:17 PM6/7/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

'No. I wasn't looking for the realization of Biafra or no Biafra....

We didn't fight to get out of Nigeria as we cannot carry the soil away.  What we fought for was that nobody crushed us and annihilate us that there would be no EASTERN REGION - Achuzia.

So what is the balyhoo of MASSOB & IPOB about?

Obi should not stake his own credibility as an intellectual on such an inconsistent fellow as Achuzia and CAO' s argument that even if there was a surrender that does not mean Biafra cannot now be resuscitated now has no leg to stand on.  Does CAO like Obi believe in the position of Achuzia or not?  To what extent is this position defendable?


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 8, 2017, 9:30:42 AM6/8/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series, yagb...@hotmail.com

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 9, 2017, 6:59:09 AM6/9/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
My argument that even if there was surrender, that that does not mean that the Biafra agitation cannot be resurrected stands on the premise that separatist agitation is a fundamental human right which one does not need any other reasons to lead or participate in.

CAO.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 9, 2017, 9:19:27 AM6/9/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
Thats understandable.  But on what grounds similar to the original impetus should it be resurrected NOW?  

Corpses of Ndigbo being slaughtered all over the federation or parts of it   and being shipped home for no lawful reasons  as in the mid 60s or for the celebrated resurgence and prosperity (facilitated by Nigerian compatriots and federal laws) all over the country from Lagos to FCT etc. ?



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 9, 2017, 5:39:29 PM6/9/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
(Peaceful)separatist agitations don't have to result to people being slaughtered.

CAO.

Kenneth Harrow

unread,
Jun 9, 2017, 6:57:17 PM6/9/17
to usaafricadialogue
I know this thread addesses biafra, but chidi’s comment resonates today with the arab spring, and the current catastrophe in syria that began with a year of peaceful protests that ultimately were quashed by the military boot of assad’s regime. Following that, war, death, 5-6 million refugees, half a million dead, etc.
ken
Kenneth Harrow
Dept of English and Film Studies
Michigan State University
619 Red Cedar Rd
East Lansing, MI 48824
517-803-8839
har...@msu.edu
http://www.english.msu.edu/people/faculty/kenneth-harrow/









On 09/06/2017, 21:59, "Chidi Anthony Opara" <usaafric...@googlegroups.com on behalf of chidi...@gmail.com> wrote:

>(Peaceful)separatist agitations don't have to result to people being slaughtered.
>
>CAO.
>

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 9, 2017, 6:57:23 PM6/9/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi


Amen!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 09/06/2017 22:39 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 9, 2017, 7:22:42 PM6/9/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
You miss the point Ken!  Chidi has eluded my query that where are igbo indigenes being exclusively slaughtered in Nigeria today to warrant the argument for exhumation of the demand for the state of Biafra?  This was the context for the original 60s agitation.  And you supported his parrying the question.

In the 60s the Igbo did not just wake up one morning and said lets peacefully demonstrate for the creation of Biafra whereupon federal forces commenced shooting them dead in their peaceful demonstrations!   

The Igbo were unlawfully slaughtered all over northern Nigeria as reprisals for a botched coup by predominantly Igbo military officers.  The innocent slaughteted Igbo were not involved in any coup but the moral high ground which the Igbo occupied over the imbroglio was soon dissipated in the cobtext of a costly civil war which claimed the lives of a hundred times more Nigerians (including the Igbo).

Had both sides agreed an interim civilian administration to bring the northern cold blooded murderers of Igbo as well as cold blooded military murderers of Nigerian military and political elite to justice rather than go to war history of Nigeria would have been on a totally different trajectory today.

No one is TODAY embarking on or contemplating targeting Igbo enmasse for murder either because of peaceful demonstration or for whatever reason.  So why agitation for Biafra today?



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 10, 2017, 1:58:59 AM6/10/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
I had earlier said that separatist agitators need no other reasons to agitate, other than the fact that(peaceful) separatist agitation is a fundamental human right, this applies also to the agitators for Biafra.

CAO.

Rex Marinus

unread,
Jun 10, 2017, 1:59:35 AM6/10/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Agbetuyi, you did not get the hint of reproach in Chidi and Ken Harrow's retort. The first thing that comes to your mind when the Igbo protest, or raise a voice to complain about their situation, is Igbo bodies slaughtered across Nigeria and trucked back to the East. Why do you conceive of that kind of carnage when it comes to the Igbo? Why do you have to kill the Igbo for political speech, for asking for justice, or for actually asking for recognition of the equality of all Nigerians failing which separation? Why is it that the only Igbo who has to stay alive in your mind is the silent Igbo, or the prostrate Igbo, or the malleable Igbo, or the Igbo who is merely "photo-on-the wall"? Now you say, "Amen!" But "Amen!" to what? To a Freudian slip? I will only ask you to be very careful with what you wish for. The Igbo are very angry and are not looking again to be slaughtered. We must make every effort to allow peace, secure it, and avoid every urge to engage in slaughter, so that we do not open the kind of dangerous floodgate Ken Harrow has alluded to. You must note this however: the Igbo are not willing to live in Nigeria as "conquered" people, or people who "surrendered" their rights with war. If seeking justice in Nigeria means  slaughter of the Igbo, then you must gird your loins with hardier cloth, and you must be prepared to kill them all. But I just hope that more civilized, more humane, and more tolerant impulses prevail, and not the impulses that dream about scattered Igbo body parts ferried home for burials. 

Obi Nwakanma





From: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Olayinka Agbetuyi <yagb...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 10:53 PM
To: usaafric...@googlegroups.com
Cc: Olayinka Agbetuyi

Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra


Amen!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 09/06/2017 22:39 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

(Peaceful)separatist agitations don't have to result to people being slaughtered.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 10, 2017, 9:35:50 PM6/10/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
Obi:

Let me be forthright with you:  You are rhe same age as my youngest sister who holds the same doctorate degree as you do and if she argues in the same vacuous way that you do she knows I would disown her. Agbetuyis dont argue like babies.  

You debase the qualifications you hold with the irresponsible line of argument you pursue which has made you the laughing stock of the forum.  I tried my best to shield you from attack by exasperated members but you are your own worst enemy.

Did you read the piece byJibrin
Ibrahim on perception of marginalization by ethnicities in Nigeria?  Why is the case of Igbo unique and why must a section of the Igbo continually blackmail the rest of Nigeria with secession to wrest more than their just due from the federation. 

 I repeat any such Igbo must feel free to withraw to Igboland to continue to deal only with fellow Igbo and leave the other responsible Igbo who realize that living is a question of give and take with other people to continue with their livelihoods in any part of Nigeria in a spirit of give and take.

If there is any act of violence against the persons of such Igbo I can guarantee that we the conscientious non Igbo will be their first line of defence and that they dont need such bigoted, prebendal, self-seeking, pretencious, ethnic jingoist and rabble rousers as yourself as champions of their interests.  

Speak only for your jaundiced self as Obi Nwakama and not for the Igbo.  I have more Igbo real friends than you do!

Rex Marinus

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 8:10:56 AM6/11/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

"Speak only for your jaundiced self as Obi Nwakama and not for the Igbo.  I have more Igbo real friends than you do!"

-Olayinka Agbetuyi


Agbetuyi:

I am going to make this my very last statement on this round of talk on Biafra because, not unexpectedly it did quickly degenerate into school-yard antics. It has become predictable, circular and boring. When people cannot deploy coherent argument, or when they enter slippery zones where they have nothing better to say, they resort to blackmail and name calling. You want to bully me with the age of you sister. I do not give a shit how old you are, or how old your sister is. Age alone does not confer regard, integrity and wisdom, none of which, I'm sorry to say, you have demonstrated, do. You have for instance not defined how it is that my argument is frivolous. Is it because I reminded you of your tendency to invoke carnage on the Igbo when they seek justice? Yet I am the one who is a "laughing stock." I do not know who is laughing, and who is the "stock." But this cliché is deployed to silence those who speak to things that are either beyond your comprehension, or that frighten you. There are two kinds of laughter: there is the laugher of the fool who laughs because he dos not know when to laugh, and there is also the laughter of the inebriated, who has a compulsion disorder at that point of over excitement. And so you can laugh all you want, if it makes you happy to think that Obi Nwakanma is a "laughing stock" in your forum. I mean, you must have clearly taken opinion samples from members of this forum to come to this claim.  it is all in character of course, that you either do not know the exact meaning of the terms you use, or you are as often as it is true remarkably full of beans. But what do you expect of people who could call Ojukwu a "coward": a man fights a war, goes into exile, returns to great acclaim, and sits "gidigbam" in the capital city on his return, and never stopped talking, never pulled punches, and never hid behind the veil of silence. When all the Generals who fought him saw him, they often stood in attention to salute him or otherwise fled from him. If such a man were a coward, then "cowardice" has a different meaning. But of course, the Agbetuyi's and the like, because they need to feel happy with themselves call Ojukwu a "coward," Obi Nwakanma, some "laughing stock," and Achuzia, "self-acclaimed war lord." You think you can really bully me with such verbal blackmail? Who gives a shit what you think? What you think does not really count where it matters most.


And please, do not insult the word "friendship." You have no Igbo friends. You have "Igboanguish" - its a form of a Nigerian national anxiety disorder; the same that affects redneck neighborhoods in the American south when it comes to African-Americans. You'd see the most racist of such say, "I have black friends." If you have Igbo friends, you wouldn't say it; there is nothing special in having Igbo friends, and the very fact that you mark them as "Igbo friends" speaks to the real issue here. I'd be unable to help you. You need to consult a shrink to deal with this depth of the unheimlich. You must stop thinking about Igbo bodies trucked home for burial because they protest. Period. The Igbo have articulated the very basis of their demands: that Nigeria must begin to treat all Nigerians with equality. The Igbo suffer disproportionately in the Nigerian enterprise - by all the indices that they have deployed in their complaints which I will not rehash here. But at the core of Igbo demand is the equality of citizenship. No Nigerian must be discriminated against wherever they reside in Nigeria. No section of Nigeria must be favored to the deficit of any part. In other words, all policy of development must be based on the human index and the human factor, not on the geographical. Public service must be transparent, etc. The Igbo understand that they have to lead the charge in the transformation of Nigeria, as they did in the anti-colonial movement, for the restoration of the equal rights of citizenship. But now hear you: "the Igbo complain too much, everybody is marginalized. They should shut up!" I am paraphrasing you. But the Igbo have never asked you not to protest; nor have they suggested that you be killed and your body parts be recovered from across Nigeria for seeking social justice. These are your very words: "Why is the case of Igbo unique and why must a section of the Igbo continually blackmail the rest of Nigeria with secession to wrest more than their just due from the federation?" This statement eerily echoes that which feeds the impulsion to genocide, whether it was by what was said of the Jews in Europe- before their expulsion from Spain or by the Nazi pogrom, or with the Tutsis in Rwanda, before their systematic slaughter. But you do not have the emotional intelligence to get even the subtle hints made by Ken Harrow or Chidi. Yet I am the laughing stock. And if you care to follow the responses to this question about Biafra and the conclusion of the war - you'd immediately notice that it follows a known and predictable pattern. It is often by the same people, from the same section of the forum and of the nation. These folk suffer from extreme forms of the anxiety called "Igboanguish." They feel rattled by the fact that the Igbo want equal rights and justice: how dare these "conquered" or "vanquished" Igbo who "surrendered" their rights?, you guys ask. This monomanic compulsion to contain the Igbo is the reason why the Igbo want out. There is your answer. But why do you want to live with the Igbo in the same country? You don't like them. You feel threatened by their presence. You can rid yourself of this Igbo problem by writing to your rep in the National Assembly to support the Act of referendum to determine the choice for secession. That is the democratic and civilized thing to do. Not blackmail the Igbo with the threat of slaughter. Once the Igbo have their own country, you may now turn back any of the buses that you see leaving the East daily towards the West at your borders. You can then also not only restrict their entry, but legitimately expel them, and through visa regulations make certain that the Igbo vermin no longer infests your neighborhood. But for as long as they are part of the same country, their rights to disperse and settle, and enjoy all the rights of citizenship must never be denied them. That's their just due. You cannot want the Igbo and not want them at the same time. There are many Igbo in this forum who keep silent, and watch, and do not bother to respond to the inanities of this obsessive anti-Igbo lynch mob. I do not speak for them. I speak on the simple premise that I have something to say, and that I will follow the Achebean injunction to "balance the stories," so that years from now, if anybody ever finds cause to read these exchanges, they will know who actually is the "laughing stock," and that yours is not the single story. In other words, I write this for my grand children. But I too have become too bored with its circularity. I shall have nothing more to say o this subject until another round of lies that needs to be corrected surfaces. And there you have it.

Obi Nwakanma




Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 1:01 AM

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 2:34:26 PM6/11/17
to usaafricadialogue
The contemporary struggle for Biafra is anchored on the conviction that Nigeria, as it is presently constituted, is a failure  that stunts the development of its citizens and only the self determination of its constituent units can assure the development of adequate human value.











On 11 June 2017 at 06:57, Rex Marinus <rexma...@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Speak only for your jaundiced self as Obi Nwakama and not for the Igbo.  I have more Igbo real friends than you do!"

-Olayinka Agbetuyi


Agbetuyi:

I am going to make this my very last statement on this round of talk on Biafra because, not unexpectedly it did quickly degenerate into school-yard antics. It has become predictable, circular and boring. When people cannot deploy coherent argument, or when they enter slippery zones where they have nothing better to say, they resort to blackmail and name calling. You want to bully me with the age of you sister. I do not give a shit how old you are, or how old your sister is. Age alone does not confer regard, integrity and wisdom, none of which, I'm sorry to say, you have demonstrated, do. You have for instance not defined how it is that my argument is frivolous. Is it because I reminded you of your tendency to invoke carnage on the Igbo when they seek justice? Yet I am the one who is a "laughing stock." I do not know who is laughing, and who is the "stock." But this cliché is deployed to silence those who speak to things that are either beyond your comprehension, or that frighten you. There are two kinds of laughter: there is the laugher of the fool who laughs because he dos not know when to laugh, and there is also the laughter of the inebriated, who has a compulsion disorder at that point of over excitement. And so you can laugh all you want, if it makes you happy to think that Obi Nwakanma is a "laughing stock" in your forum. I mean, you must have clearly taken opinion samples from members of this forum to come to this claim.  it is all in character of course, that you either do not know the exact meaning of the terms you use, or you are as often as it is true remarkably full of beans. But what do you expect of people who could call Ojukwu a "coward": a man fights a war, goes into exile, returns to great acclaim, and sits "gidigbam" in the capital city on his return, and never stopped talking, never pulled punches, and never hid behind the veil of silence. When all the Generals who fought him saw him, they often stood in attention to salute him or otherwise fled from him. If such a man were a coward, then "cowardice" has a different meaning. But of course, the Agbetuyi's and the like, because they need to feel happy with themselves call Ojukwu a "coward," Obi Nwakanma, some "laughing stock," and Achuzia, "self-acclaimed war lord." You think you can really bully me with such verbal blackmail? Who gives a shit what you think? What you think does not really count where it matters most.


And please, do not insult the word "friendship." You have no Igbo friends. You have "Igboanguish" - its a form of a Nigerian national anxiety disorder; the same that affects redneck neighborhoods in the American south when it comes to African-Americans. You'd see the most racist of such say, "I have black friends." If you have Igbo friends, you wouldn't say it; there is nothing special in having Igbo friends, and the very fact that you mark them as "Igbo friends" speaks to the real issue here. I'd be unable to help you. You need to consult a shrink to deal with this depth of the unheimlich. You must stop thinking about Igbo bodies trucked home for burial because they protest. Period. The Igbo have articulated the very basis of their demands: that Nigeria must begin to treat all Nigerians with equality. The Igbo suffer disproportionately in the Nigerian enterprise - by all the indices that they have deployed in their complaints which I will not rehash here. But at the core of Igbo demand is the equality of citizenship. No Nigerian must be discriminated against wherever they reside in Nigeria. No section of Nigeria must be favored to the deficit of any part. In other words, all policy of development must be based on the human index and the human factor, not on the geographical. Public service must be transparent, etc. The Igbo understand that they have to lead the charge in the transformation of Nigeria, as they did in the anti-colonial movement, for the restoration of the equal rights of citizenship. But now hear you: "the Igbo complain too much, everybody is marginalized. They should shut up!" I am paraphrasing you. But the Igbo have never asked you not to protest; nor have they suggested that you be killed and your body parts be recovered from across Nigeria for seeking social justice. These are your very words: "Why is the case of Igbo unique and why must a section of the Igbo continually blackmail the rest of Nigeria with secession to wrest more than their just due from the federation?" This statement eerily echoes that which feeds the impulsion to genocide, whether it was by what was said of the Jews in Europe- before their expulsion from Spain or by the Nazi pogrom, or with the Tutsis in Rwanda, before their systematic slaughter. But you do not have the emotional intelligence to get even the subtle hints made by Ken Harrow or Chidi. Yet I am the laughing stock. And if you care to follow the responses to this question about Biafra and the conclusion of the war - you'd immediately notice that it follows a known and predictable pattern. It is often by the same people, from the same section of the forum and of the nation. These folk suffer from extreme forms of the anxiety called "Igboanguish." They feel rattled by the fact that the Igbo want equal rights and justice: how dare these "conquered" or "vanquished" Igbo who "surrendered" their rights?, you guys ask. This monomanic compulsion to contain the Igbo is the reason why the Igbo want out. There is your answer. But why do you want to live with the Igbo in the same country? You don't like them. You feel threatened by their presence. You can rid yourself of this Igbo problem by writing to your rep in the National Assembly to support the Act of referendum to determine the choice for secession. That is the democratic and civilized thing to do. Not blackmail the Igbo with the threat of slaughter. Once the Igbo have their own country, you may now turn back any of the buses that you see leaving the East daily towards the West at your borders. You can then also not only restrict their entry, but legitimately expel them, and through visa regulations make certain that the Igbo vermin no longer infests your neighborhood. But for as long as they are part of the same country, their rights to disperse and settle, and enjoy all the rights of citizenship must never be denied them. That's their just due. You cannot want the Igbo and not want them at the same time. There are many Igbo in this forum who keep silent, and watch, and do not bother to respond to the inanities of this obsessive anti-Igbo lynch mob. I do not speak for them. I speak on the simple premise that I have something to say, and that I will follow the Achebean injunction to "balance the stories," so that years from now, if anybody ever finds cause to read these exchanges, they will know who actually is the "laughing stock," and that yours is not the single story. In other words, I write this for my grand children. But I too have become too bored with its circularity. I shall have nothing more to say o this subject until another round of lies that needs to be corrected surfaces. And there you have it.

Obi Nwakanma



Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 1:01 AM

Cc: Olayinka Agbetuyi
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra
Obi:

Let me be forthright with you:  You are rhe same age as my youngest sister who holds the same doctorate degree as you do and if she argues in the same vacuous way that you do she knows I would disown her. Agbetuyis dont argue like babies.  

You debase the qualifications you hold with the irresponsible line of argument you pursue which has made you the laughing stock of the forum.  I tried my best to shield you from attack by exasperated members but you are your own worst enemy.

Did you read the piece byJibrin
Ibrahim on perception of marginalization by ethnicities in Nigeria?  Why is the case of Igbo unique and why must a section of the Igbo continually blackmail the rest of Nigeria with secession to wrest more than their just due from the federation. 

 I repeat any such Igbo must feel free to withraw to Igboland to continue to deal only with fellow Igbo and leave the other responsible Igbo who realize that living is a question of give and take with other people to continue with their livelihoods in any part of Nigeria in a spirit of give and take.

If there is any act of violence against the persons of such Igbo I can guarantee that we the conscientious non Igbo will be their first line of defence and that they dont need such bigoted, prebendal, self-seeking, pretencious, ethnic jingoist and rabble rousers as yourself as champions of their interests.  

Speak only for your jaundiced self as Obi Nwakama and not for the Igbo.  I have more Igbo real friends than you do!



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Rex Marinus <rexma...@hotmail.com>
Date: 10/06/2017 06:59 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Agbetuyi, you did not get the hint of reproach in Chidi and Ken Harrow's retort. The first thing that comes to your mind when the Igbo protest, or raise a voice to complain about their situation, is Igbo bodies slaughtered across Nigeria and trucked back to the East. Why do you conceive of that kind of carnage when it comes to the Igbo? Why do you have to kill the Igbo for political speech, for asking for justice, or for actually asking for recognition of the equality of all Nigerians failing which separation? Why is it that the only Igbo who has to stay alive in your mind is the silent Igbo, or the prostrate Igbo, or the malleable Igbo, or the Igbo who is merely "photo-on-the wall"? Now you say, "Amen!" But "Amen!" to what? To a Freudian slip? I will only ask you to be very careful with what you wish for. The Igbo are very angry and are not looking again to be slaughtered. We must make every effort to allow peace, secure it, and avoid every urge to engage in slaughter, so that we do not open the kind of dangerous floodgate Ken Harrow has alluded to. You must note this however: the Igbo are not willing to live in Nigeria as "conquered" people, or people who "surrendered" their rights with war. If seeking justice in Nigeria means  slaughter of the Igbo, then you must gird your loins with hardier cloth, and you must be prepared to kill them all. But I just hope that more civilized, more humane, and more tolerant impulses prevail, and not the impulses that dream about scattered Igbo body parts ferried home for burials. 

Obi Nwakanma





Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 10:53 PM

Cc: Olayinka Agbetuyi
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra


Amen!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 09/06/2017 22:39 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

(Peaceful)separatist agitations don't have to result to people being slaughtered.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 3:18:50 PM6/11/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

If that is the case calling that struggle Biafra is a misnomer.

 Biafra is regional and if the struggle is novel and national, acceptable neutral national nomenclature would ensure a cohesive rallying point and the success of the struggle, rather than tie it to a regional debacle that has already been determined.




Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Date: 11/06/2017 19:34 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 3:19:35 PM6/11/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

Yes Obi Nwakama you are right about the circularity that has become nauseating for the past ten years now.  Nigeria has had two clear civil wars of secession and the second is still in the mop up stage.  If lies are told about any of them in the future we will not hesitate to challenge the veracity. You know very that on this forum Im not one to take insults as strategy of choice.  

Yet when facts are laid out clear and unambiguously and fifty year old with higher degrees pretend they vould not understand why 2+2=4. That is a round about way of calling discussants total morons for which the assaulted sesibilities have the right of self defense.

The tragic error which many Biafranists make is that just because your name is not Okonkwo or Okafor then you have no Igbo in your family or extended family;  i.e only an Okonkwo can defend the interests of an Okafor.  Life is more complex than that and we all are on big family!

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 3:52:56 PM6/11/17
to usaafricadialogue

The Biafra vision is trans-Igbo in its ideological fundamentals but is Igbo in its practical expression.

The SW political elite have previously been the primary advocates of restructuring the nation's political and economic organization to allow for the independence of its constituent units rather than the current crippling dominance from the centre and the debilitating dependence on the mono-economy represented by Niger Delta oil but the previously loudest voices from  that region have been muted since they succeeded in entering Aso Rock through the vice-presidency of Yemi Osinbajo, silence inspired by   their Hausa-Fulani allies who have consistently voiced their resistance to reworking the political and economic organization of the nation.

It has therefore fallen to the largely Igbo pro-Biafra agitators,  pursuing the secession vision of the reworking of Nigeria, to struggle for a social structure  that is shaped in the interests of its citizens, not the interests of colonial master Britain who created the dysfunctional nation and the right wing Muslim North, who have succeeded in bleeding the nation through various structural controls, from multiplication of local governments in their region as opposed to other regions as a means of attracting federal revenue and the establishing of ridiculously low cut off marks as opposed to high cut off marks for other regions in entrance exams to schools and universities, breeding a culture of mediocrity.

Do you want a country where you and your descendants are empowered to actualize their potential,where excellence is central in the quest for education and job placements, where you will be free from Fulani terrorism as the nomadic advance  guard of terrorists run cows across your schools and farms, attacking and killing any who oppose the destruction of their lives and property by such  atavistic lifestyles?

Do you want a nation in which the parasitic, initiative deadening culture of  flow of oil from the Niger Delta to the federal centre and its distribution to the regions as the central economic activity is terminated,  as each region or nation  struggles to build its own economic structure, taking the country into industrialization, attracting back to Nigeria or nations created from the older country  citizens across the world who have fled to other nations because  their own country is asphyxiating to human development?

If you do, join the Biafra secession struggle or the restructuring struggle. Taking refuge in castigating the Biafra struggle as it champions freedom from slavery is equivalent to sustaining your  own   slavery in the killing fields of Nigeria, where the  massacres of thousands, murderous colonization initiatives  exemplified by the massacres in Agatu in the Middle Belt  and Nimbo in the South East,  by the militia/politician network of Fulani terrorists,who remain free to walk  the land even as they boldly and loudly justify their massacres of communities, demonstrates your status as worse than that of second class citizens, being that of sub-humans whose lives are at the mercy of  their murderous masters.

thanks

toyin


Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 5:57:43 PM6/11/17
to usaafricadialogue
In the agony of Nigeria, the people who are most clear eyed about how to get out of this hell are the secessionists. The vanguard of secession is the Igbo vision of Biafra because the injustices that inspired the 1960s drive for Biafra remain entrenched in Nigeria, expressed in various ways, both similar to and different from the 1960s experience.

Those who hold that Nigeria's problems are rooted in corruption are focusing on the fruits and not the roots of the problem.

Those who hold that they want restructuring must take account of the desperate determination of the right wing Hausa-Fulani to avoid restructuring at all cost because the present arrangement suits them.

The non-Muslim minorities in the North and the Middle Belt, emboldened  by the Biafra struggle, are making progress in declaring their freedom from tyranny of the right wing Hausa-Fulani, a tyranny dramatized by the massacre of their people and colonization of their lands by Fulani terrorism in Southern Kaduna and the Middle Belt.

The Niger Delta, as represented by its response to the right wing Hausa-Fulani Kaduna Declaration,  is speaking up in support of the Biafra struggle which reflects its own struggle for resource control and self determination.

The other minority groups are watching the unfolding struggle as they seek their own direction about the way forward in the Nigeria crisis.

thanks

toyin


Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 5:58:17 PM6/11/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi


Let me begin by saying that I dont celebrate hate, but celebrate community.  I connot substitute a culture of hate of the Igbo by one part of the country for the inordinate hate of the North by another.  

We will fall into the same error of the Nzegwus which precipitated Biafra if we pretend that the looters are only from the North and the stratospheric looting in the East and by the likes of the Fayoses in the South West is to be glossed over.  

Any such projects towards accountability and civic equality designated as Biafra has failed from the start by comparing oranges with apples.  Buhari the head of government elected to head the democratic movement toward greater acountability was never a Biafran. Neither was his deputy.

You and I must continue to hold the government to account no matter who heads it or comprise it.  

You cannot say the move toward balkanization is self determination which will improve accountability if state governments are looting their own people blind without being forced to do so at gun point by the centre. 

 Hatred of the North or the South West by itself will not solve any of the Nigerian problems any more than hatred of the Igbo will.

The Fulani herdsmen saga can only be solved permanently within the context of a democratic accountability rather than Biafranists seeing it as a window  of opportunity to hurriedly conclude their unfinished business before democratic accounting takes its due course.

The resuscitated Biafra business must be seen as a separate issue by those interested and must be taken through the appropriate DEMOCRATIC channels:

1. Referendum in the states to compose Biafra (with observers from other states)

2. Time table for dissengagement and voting for disengagement by the National Assembly if referendum is decisive on leaving.

3.  Formula for sharing of proven national assets equitably between present federating units at the point of severance.  So that Anambra govt, say, will continue after separation to receive its just desert of uranium from Gombe hills and Bauchi will continue to receive its just desert of coal from Enugu.  (Trust me working these house will not be a couple of years and separation will not commence until every detail has been worked out and implementation guarateed and treaties signed to that effect. The altetnative is chaos and armed secession whose outcome will be messy and indeterminable.)



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Date: 11/06/2017 20:52 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Segun Ogungbemi

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 5:58:36 PM6/11/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com
Toyin, 
Is there no better means to achieve true federalism without violence? The Ndigbo have their representatives in the National Assembly, why can't they use a democratic means similar to that of the Scottish in the UK? 
They should go through the constitutional means and use relevant provisions of the constitution to justify their reasonable demand. 
It is better to live in peace or separate, if need be in peace. But it is beautiful to be together as one Nigeria. 
We should note that the Igbos that are agitating for the independence of Biafra are probably doing so to be politically relevant. Experience has shown that once their leaders have become politically relevant and  become part of political office holders, they usually throw up their initial ambition into the air and  another group resurfaces. 
SO


Sent from my iPhone 
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 5:58:51 PM6/11/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

I have been at the vanguard for the struggles for restructuring long before you joined this forum and am still committed to its ideals long before Biafranists hijacked its ideals. 

 I castigated El-Rufai on this forum for his lapses and utterances and adequate action has been taken on El-Rufai to reflect our views.  So calling my status as 'sum
b human' with regard to the situation is untrue and is unhelpful to your cause as well as mine.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Date: 11/06/2017 20:52 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Toyin Falola

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 6:08:33 PM6/11/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com
Question by the moderator:
Who are these Hausa-Fulani who are destroying Nigeria?
Is the north not the poorest in Nigeria?
Can't you and I not frame a transformational agenda outside of ethnic fault lines?
TF

Sent from my iPhone
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 7:58:58 PM6/11/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
How can one frame a transformational agenda outside ethnicity in a country where the President and Vice-president unapologetically indulge in brazen tribalism?

CAO.

Kenneth Harrow

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 7:59:05 PM6/11/17
to usaafricadialogue
Segun, scotland can legally separate through devolution, can’t it? Is that an option for biafra?
Other similar questions for quebec, and for northern ireland. aren’t they different, legally?
ken

Kenneth Harrow

Dept of English and Film Studies

Michigan State University

619 Red Cedar Rd

East Lansing, MI 48824

517-803-8839

har...@msu.edu

http://www.english.msu.edu/people/faculty/kenneth-harrow/

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 7:59:37 PM6/11/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

The present structure does not suit 'the right-wing Hausa Fulani' alone but is the product of the agreed deliberations of all Nigerians as enshrined in the 1999 constitution.

The only reason the Biafranists  (note that I did not say Igbo)are championning dissolution is that being majority in their envisioned states they will be able to avoid the checks and balances in a larger Nigerian federation and be able to practise on them what they accuse North of perpetrating on the rest. 

The delta minority thinks because oil is found in its area it should take the largest share ang give what it likes to the rest.  That is the American way. Nigeria is not the 51st state of America.

 The best guarantee of safety to the minor ethnicities are the contiguous larger ones within the present set up as well as the Constitution.

I have said before that what would have convinced everyone to toe the Biafranists line if people saw them as the best managed states.  They are as culpable as other states of the federation.

The genuine way to tackle restructuring is through the national assembly so that some areas dont take advantage of the Constitution.

To my mind what we are talking about is a human problem rather than a constitutional crisis.  In any constititional arrangement thieves will steal if they fail to internalise the importance of probity and fairplay in any polity.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Date: 11/06/2017 22:57 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 11, 2017, 7:59:42 PM6/11/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

To the Muslim Brethren the message is clear : Surah Ali 'Imran ayat 103

Exiting a Nigerian National Brotherhood that comprises more than 250 ethnicities and (a veritable tower Babel) as many diverse tongues, should prove to be no easy task, even if it is or was the desire of each and every region to leave the Federation at one and the same time. This would append so many new, bright and colourful flags fluttering on the Africa Union flagpoles and for the less endowed, it would still continue to be a matter of SURVIVAL

Survival. It's a word you don't hear on the lips of the corrupt elites, wherever they are...

Boko Haram wants its Caliphate. Can't that too be arrived at through a peaceful referendum?

Of course, it should be easiest for the Delta Region to make such a decision to leave Nigeria, in no time at all the Delta Region could be like Kuwait or any of the Gulf States, because the Delta region is the headquarters of the nation's capital assets, the nation's lifeblood, the region where as Fela says, Oil dey flow underground like-e river and that's why the Delta would be a sine qua non for anybody's healthy economy, not least of all our hypothetical Biafra , which the oil-soaked & environmentally degraded Delta could join voluntarily, certainly preferable to being forcibly annexed - even if the Delta can do without Biafra; but how well could Biafra be, without some Delta oil?

Surely, having lived together for so long - and a friend in need is a friend indeed, this is not a time for one part to leave the other parts/ brothers of Nigeria in the lurch.

One of the values held by social democracy is that the strong, should help the weak....

Fast-forward Vision : With an abundance of people like Philip Emeagwali the so called " father of the Internet" being of Igbo extraction we are to suppose that the so revered Biafra could be the first African Nation to put a monkey in space...





On Sunday, 11 June 2017 21:52:56 UTC+2, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:

The Biafra vision is trans-Igbo in its ideological fundamentals but is Igbo in its practical expression.

The SW political elite have previously been the primary advocates of restructuring the nation's political and economic organization to allow for the independence of its constituent units rather than the current crippling dominance from the centre and the debilitating dependence on the mono-economy represented by Niger Delta oil but the previously loudest voices from  that region have been muted since they succeeded in entering Aso Rock through the vice-presidency of Yemi Osinbajo, silence inspired by   their Hausa-Fulani allies who have consistently voiced their resistance to reworking the political and economic organization of the nation.

It has therefore fallen to the largely Igbo pro-Biafra agitators,  pursuing the secession vision of the reworking of Nigeria, to struggle for a social structure  that is shaped in the interests of its citizens, not the interests of colonial master Britain who created the dysfunctional nation and the right wing Muslim North, who have succeeded in bleeding the nation through various structural controls, from multiplication of local governments in their region as opposed to other regions as a means of attracting federal revenue and the establishing of ridiculously low cut off marks as opposed to high cut off marks for other regions in entrance exams to schools and universities, breeding a culture of mediocrity.

Do you want a country where you and your descendants are empowered to actualize their potential,where excellence is central in the quest for education and job placements, where you will be free from Fulani terrorism as the nomadic advance  guard of terrorists run cows across your schools and farms, attacking and killing any who oppose the destruction of their lives and property by such  atavistic lifestyles?

Do you want a nation in which the parasitic, initiative deadening culture of  flow of oil from the Niger Delta to the federal centre and its distribution to the regions as the central economic activity is terminated,  as each region or nation  struggles to build its own economic structure, taking the country into industrialization, attracting back to Nigeria or nations created from the older country  citizens across the world who have fled to other nations because  their own country is asphyxiating to human development?

If you do, join the Biafra secession struggle or the restructuring struggle. Taking refuge in castigating the Biafra struggle as it champions freedom from slavery is equivalent to sustaining your  own   slavery in the killing fields of Nigeria, where the  massacres of thousands, murderous colonization initiatives  exemplified by the massacres in Agatu in the Middle Belt  and Nimbo in the South East,  by the militia/politician network of Fulani terrorists,who remain free to walk  the land even as they boldly and loudly justify their massacres of communities, demonstrates your status as worse than that of second class citizens, being that of sub-humans whose lives are at the mercy of  their murderous masters.

thanks

toyin


On 11 June 2017 at 19:28, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com> wrote:
The contemporary struggle for Biafra is anchored on the conviction that Nigeria, as it is presently constituted, is a failure  that stunts the development of its citizens and only the self determination of its constituent units can assure the development of adequate human value.










On 11 June 2017 at 06:57, Rex Marinus <rexma...@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Speak only for your jaundiced self as Obi Nwakama and not for the Igbo.  I have more Igbo real friends than you do!"

-Olayinka Agbetuyi


Agbetuyi:

I am going to make this my very last statement on this round of talk on Biafra because, not unexpectedly it did quickly degenerate into school-yard antics. It has become predictable, circular and boring. When people cannot deploy coherent argument, or when they enter slippery zones where they have nothing better to say, they resort to blackmail and name calling. You want to bully me with the age of you sister. I do not give a shit how old you are, or how old your sister is. Age alone does not confer regard, integrity and wisdom, none of which, I'm sorry to say, you have demonstrated, do. You have for instance not defined how it is that my argument is frivolous. Is it because I reminded you of your tendency to invoke carnage on the Igbo when they seek justice? Yet I am the one who is a "laughing stock." I do not know who is laughing, and who is the "stock." But this cliché is deployed to silence those who speak to things that are either beyond your comprehension, or that frighten you. There are two kinds of laughter: there is the laugher of the fool who laughs because he dos not know when to laugh, and there is also the laughter of the inebriated, who has a compulsion disorder at that point of over excitement. And so you can laugh all you want, if it makes you happy to think that Obi Nwakanma is a "laughing stock" in your forum. I mean, you must have clearly taken opinion samples from members of this forum to come to this claim.  it is all in character of course, that you either do not know the exact meaning of the terms you use, or you are as often as it is true remarkably full of beans. But what do you expect of people who could call Ojukwu a "coward": a man fights a war, goes into exile, returns to great acclaim, and sits "gidigbam" in the capital city on his return, and never stopped talking, never pulled punches, and never hid behind the veil of silence. When all the Generals who fought him saw him, they often stood in attention to salute him or otherwise fled from him. If such a man were a coward, then "cowardice" has a different meaning. But of course, the Agbetuyi's and the like, because they need to feel happy with themselves call Ojukwu a "coward," Obi Nwakanma, some "laughing stock," and Achuzia, "self-acclaimed war lord." You think you can really bully me with such verbal blackmail? Who gives a shit what you think? What you think does not really count where it matters most.


And please, do not insult the word "friendship." You have no Igbo friends. You have "Igboanguish" - its a form of a Nigerian national anxiety disorder; the same that affects redneck neighborhoods in the American south when it comes to African-Americans. You'd see the most racist of such say, "I have black friends." If you have Igbo friends, you wouldn't say it; there is nothing special in having Igbo friends, and the very fact that you mark them as "Igbo friends" speaks to the real issue here. I'd be unable to help you. You need to consult a shrink to deal with this depth of the unheimlich. You must stop thinking about Igbo bodies trucked home for burial because they protest. Period. The Igbo have articulated the very basis of their demands: that Nigeria must begin to treat all Nigerians with equality. The Igbo suffer disproportionately in the Nigerian enterprise - by all the indices that they have deployed in their complaints which I will not rehash here. But at the core of Igbo demand is the equality of citizenship. No Nigerian must be discriminated against wherever they reside in Nigeria. No section of Nigeria must be favored to the deficit of any part. In other words, all policy of development must be based on the human index and the human factor, not on the geographical. Public service must be transparent, etc. The Igbo understand that they have to lead the charge in the transformation of Nigeria, as they did in the anti-colonial movement, for the restoration of the equal rights of citizenship. But now hear you: "the Igbo complain too much, everybody is marginalized. They should shut up!" I am paraphrasing you. But the Igbo have never asked you not to protest; nor have they suggested that you be killed and your body parts be recovered from across Nigeria for seeking social justice. These are your very words: "Why is the case of Igbo unique and why must a section of the Igbo continually blackmail the rest of Nigeria with secession to wrest more than their just due from the federation?" This statement eerily echoes that which feeds the impulsion to genocide, whether it was by what was said of the Jews in Europe- before their expulsion from Spain or by the Nazi pogrom, or with the Tutsis in Rwanda, before their systematic slaughter. But you do not have the emotional intelligence to get even the subtle hints made by Ken Harrow or Chidi. Yet I am the laughing stock. And if you care to follow the responses to this question about Biafra and the conclusion of the war - you'd immediately notice that it follows a known and predictable pattern. It is often by the same people, from the same section of the forum and of the nation. These folk suffer from extreme forms of the anxiety called "Igboanguish." They feel rattled by the fact that the Igbo want equal rights and justice: how dare these "conquered" or "vanquished" Igbo who "surrendered" their rights?, you guys ask. This monomanic compulsion to contain the Igbo is the reason why the Igbo want out. There is your answer. But why do you want to live with the Igbo in the same country? You don't like them. You feel threatened by their presence. You can rid yourself of this Igbo problem by writing to your rep in the National Assembly to support the Act of referendum to determine the choice for secession. That is the democratic and civilized thing to do. Not blackmail the Igbo with the threat of slaughter. Once the Igbo have their own country, you may now turn back any of the buses that you see leaving the East daily towards the West at your borders. You can then also not only restrict their entry, but legitimately expel them, and through visa regulations make certain that the Igbo vermin no longer infests your neighborhood. But for as long as they are part of the same country, their rights to disperse and settle, and enjoy all the rights of citizenship must never be denied them. That's their just due. You cannot want the Igbo and not want them at the same time. There are many Igbo in this forum who keep silent, and watch, and do not bother to respond to the inanities of this obsessive anti-Igbo lynch mob. I do not speak for them. I speak on the simple premise that I have something to say, and that I will follow the Achebean injunction to "balance the stories," so that years from now, if anybody ever finds cause to read these exchanges, they will know who actually is the "laughing stock," and that yours is not the single story. In other words, I write this for my grand children. But I too have become too bored with its circularity. I shall have nothing more to say o this subject until another round of lies that needs to be corrected surfaces. And there you have it.

Obi Nwakanma



Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 1:01 AM

Cc: Olayinka Agbetuyi
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra
Obi:

Let me be forthright with you:  You are rhe same age as my youngest sister who holds the same doctorate degree as you do and if she argues in the same vacuous way that you do she knows I would disown her. Agbetuyis dont argue like babies.  

You debase the qualifications you hold with the irresponsible line of argument you pursue which has made you the laughing stock of the forum.  I tried my best to shield you from attack by exasperated members but you are your own worst enemy.

Did you read the piece byJibrin
Ibrahim on perception of marginalization by ethnicities in Nigeria?  Why is the case of Igbo unique and why must a section of the Igbo continually blackmail the rest of Nigeria with secession to wrest more than their just due from the federation. 

 I repeat any such Igbo must feel free to withraw to Igboland to continue to deal only with fellow Igbo and leave the other responsible Igbo who realize that living is a question of give and take with other people to continue with their livelihoods in any part of Nigeria in a spirit of give and take.

If there is any act of violence against the persons of such Igbo I can guarantee that we the conscientious non Igbo will be their first line of defence and that they dont need such bigoted, prebendal, self-seeking, pretencious, ethnic jingoist and rabble rousers as yourself as champions of their interests.  

Speak only for your jaundiced self as Obi Nwakama and not for the Igbo.  I have more Igbo real friends than you do!



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Rex Marinus <rexma...@hotmail.com>
Date: 10/06/2017 06:59 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Agbetuyi, you did not get the hint of reproach in Chidi and Ken Harrow's retort. The first thing that comes to your mind when the Igbo protest, or raise a voice to complain about their situation, is Igbo bodies slaughtered across Nigeria and trucked back to the East. Why do you conceive of that kind of carnage when it comes to the Igbo? Why do you have to kill the Igbo for political speech, for asking for justice, or for actually asking for recognition of the equality of all Nigerians failing which separation? Why is it that the only Igbo who has to stay alive in your mind is the silent Igbo, or the prostrate Igbo, or the malleable Igbo, or the Igbo who is merely "photo-on-the wall"? Now you say, "Amen!" But "Amen!" to what? To a Freudian slip? I will only ask you to be very careful with what you wish for. The Igbo are very angry and are not looking again to be slaughtered. We must make every effort to allow peace, secure it, and avoid every urge to engage in slaughter, so that we do not open the kind of dangerous floodgate Ken Harrow has alluded to. You must note this however: the Igbo are not willing to live in Nigeria as "conquered" people, or people who "surrendered" their rights with war. If seeking justice in Nigeria means  slaughter of the Igbo, then you must gird your loins with hardier cloth, and you must be prepared to kill them all. But I just hope that more civilized, more humane, and more tolerant impulses prevail, and not the impulses that dream about scattered Igbo body parts ferried home for burials. 

Obi Nwakanma





Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 10:53 PM

Cc: Olayinka Agbetuyi
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra


Amen!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 09/06/2017 22:39 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

(Peaceful)separatist agitations don't have to result to people being slaughtered.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 13, 2017, 8:40:43 AM6/13/17
to usaafricadialogue
I want to try to respond to some of the issues raised in terms of my own understanding of these complex subjects, distilling what I see as the dominant perspectives in the pro-Biafra struggle.

1. 'Question by the moderator:
Who are these Hausa-Fulani who are destroying Nigeria?
Is the north not the poorest in Nigeria?
Can't you and I not frame a transformational agenda outside of ethnic fault lines?
TF'

The Muslim North operates in terms of a symbiotic relationship between its political elite and other members of that demographic.

Dissenting voices exist, but they are in the minority.

The poverty of the region is secondary to this bond.

When an ethnically homogenous  group of people are able to massacre other ethnicities in the same country and go free even when they publicly justify their actions, and repeat those murderous actions again and again, in a  context in which the national ruler belongs to the same ethnicity as themselves, with politicians from this ethnicity defending their actions and trying to use the resources of the country in taking care of the interests of the murderous group, it would be suicidal to ignore the clear reality evident to one, particularly when the same  national ruler has placed his kinsmen in  charge  of practically all security agencies in the nation, as well making another  such the head of INEC, the national electoral body.

A knowledge of the political strategy  of totalitarian or semi-totalitarian cultures in semi-tribal societies as in Nigeria could make it clear that an old script is being played, the kind that was employed in Sudan by Omar al Bashar  through the janjaweed.

When a politician-Atiku Abubakar- from a region that relates with the nation to a large extent through violence-from mob massacres across decades and pogrom to military coups to religiously ascribed individual murders to threats like the Kaduna Declaration-is able to threaten the nation with violent change bcs someone from his ethnic group, specifically himself,  was not made presidential candidate  and he is able to go free after such treason, after which the nation witnesses the resurgence of a terrorist group from his region  based on the dominant religion of that region,  a terrorist group targeting the newly elected govt and co-religionists of the new President,  , a terrorist group  publicly embraced by some of  the region's elite and  given shelter by a significant no of the region's  citizens in the early years of the resurgence,  then its clear that region poses  a problem that is not replicated in other regions.

2.' The Ndigbo have their representatives in the National Assembly, why can't they use a democratic means similar to that of the Scottish in the UK? '

Soldiers of the Buhari govt massacred peaceful IPOB protesters praying in a church.

What did SE reps and governors do?  As far as I know, nothing.

The governor of Enugu state did everything he knew to avert the anticipated attacks of Fulani terrorists on Nimbo, without success. What did he do next? I understand he requested for prayers.

Who has driven the effort to address grievances of Igbo people, even after Achebe's historic declaration shortly before he passed away that Ndigbo have not been integrated into Nigeria?

Was any role played by Ekweremadu, the current deputy senate president? By any of the governors of the South Eastern states? By any representatives of the SE in any of the legislative houses?

Little or none. Everyone is scrambling to position themselves politically and in the Buhari era, restive behavior attracts the attention of EFCC, unless you are a governor, and therefore have immunity  like Fayose or are a die hard like FFK, a regular EFCC detention customer, these being  two SW figures who are the most vigorous critics of the Buhari govt. The SE governors may also be seen as strategising  to become  the anointed prince of the hoped for Igbo presidency of Nigeria which some see as a way to please Ndigbo, and therefore may be keen to be seen as good boys sustaining the status quo.

Therefore, it has taken a political outsider, Nnamdi Kanu to bring to the burning centre of the national conversation the exclusions and denigration of Ndigbo, a reflection of the larger dysfunctional polity. People for whom the political system has enabled are not playing that role.

The IPOB strategy is to push the barrier created by the resistance of the political elite in general and the right wing Hausa Fulani in particular on the reworking of Nigeria. Will their efforts result in going beyond talk and threats from govt and its agents and right wing Hausa-Fulani as in the Kaduna Declaration, to issue in peaceful means of renegotiating the nation? IPOB's methods are peaceful and do not in any way suggest a call for or a provocation of war.

As it is, the clock is ticking. Even a self appointed Urhobo spokesperson has declared Urhobo should be independent of Nigeria. The  likes of Buhari who declare  that Nigeria's unity is non-negotiable and the attorney general  ruling out restructuring might find the system dissolving around them. IPOB has shown the way through their May 30th sit as home order. Will the army go into houses to shoot people? How can far can the state attack peaceful methods of civil disobedience?

3. 'I have been at the vanguard for the struggles for restructuring long before you joined this forum and am still committed to its ideals long before Biafranists hijacked its ideals. 

 I castigated El-Rufai on this forum for his lapses and utterances and adequate action has been taken on El-Rufai to reflect our views.  So calling my status as 'sub human' with regard to the situation is untrue and is unhelpful to your cause as well as mine.'

Restructuring in the contemporary sense was birthed by the eventually truncated  Aburi Accord, which act contributed to throwing up the civil war.

The move to secession of 1960s Biafra and the contemporary drive for Biafra are responses to the failure of the demand for restructuring.

As for the SW political elite who have championed restructuring perhaps since the NADECO days,  what have they done to pursue that vision now that they are in power,having entered Aso Rock in 2015?

Any news from Tinubu and his political child, Osinbajo, any from Fashola, Fayemi etc, who, as ministers, are now well positioned to initiate that vision?

None. Their current struggle is for political survival.

Only a few voices such as that of rebels like Yinka Odumakin still try to speak out, but they they are drowned by the prevailing determined silence.

I also stated  that anyone who is content to take refuge in castigating Biafra without working at addressing the dehumanising situation the Biafra vision is created to address has consented to the subhuman status of being food for murderous slave masters who  swooped on ex finance minster Olu Falae's farm, ravaged it and killed his guards, killed people in Ekiti until stopped by its governor Fayose, swept into Agatu and Nimbo and massacred hundreds, occupy large swathes of the middle belt after subduing or decimating their populations in their nation wide colonization drive, among other inhumanities ongoing for years but  escalating in the reign of the Fulani national ruler. We all  know where we stand.

4. A. 'The present structure does not suit 'the right-wing Hausa Fulani' alone but is the product of the agreed deliberations of all Nigerians as enshrined in the 1999 constitution'

To what degree is the 1999 constitution a "product of the agreed deliberations of all Nigerians"? To what degree is the current political/economic structure the outcome of agreed deliberations by all Nigerians?

B. 'The only reason the Biafranists  (note that I did not say Igbo)are championning dissolution is that being majority in their envisioned states they will be able to avoid the checks and balances in a larger Nigerian federation and be able to practise on them what they accuse North of perpetrating on the rest.'

'even if the Delta can do without Biafra; but how well could Biafra be, without some Delta oil?'

The current Biafra vision is centred on Igbo states and excludes non-Igbo states.

The Biafrans are convinced that their central asset  is their resourcefulness, magnified by a common vision,  not natural resources from anywhere.

C. 'The delta minority thinks because oil is found in its area it should take the largest share ang give what it likes to the rest.  That is the American way. Nigeria is not the 51st state of America.'

Why not? What good has this oil 'wealth' done us anyway?

D. 'The best guarantee of safety to the minor ethnicities are the contiguous larger ones within the present set up as well as the Constitution'.

A highly controversial view going from experience of what actually happens, the Southern Kaduna horrors being the most graphic recent example.

E. 'I have said before that what would have convinced everyone to toe the Biafranists line if people saw them as the best managed states.  They are as culpable as other states of the federation'.

'You cannot say the move toward balkanization is self determination which will improve accountability if state governments are looting their own people blind without being forced to do so at gun point by the centre.'

The Biafra vision is not identical with working within the current politic and economic organisation of the South East. The Biafra vision may be seen as based on the understanding that the current political and economic structure of Nigeria works against the developmental potential of all its units. The people running the South East are not evidently Biafra advocates nor are they trying to provide examples of what Biafra could be if given a chance.

Information Sources

By virtue of their membership of this group, readers would be aware of the great value of   social media in following developments in Nigerian politics.Correlating this with other sources and a knowledge of Nigerian history greatly facilitates watching  this history unfold, understanding this progression  and taking part in its unfolding.

I am not up to date with Yahoo and Goggle groups, which are also excellent, on account of time constraints, but I currently use Facebook a lot. For views for and against Biafra, by Igbos  and non-Igbos, I find the Facebook accounts of the following people  very useful. I have also added names of Facebook groups which I hardly  use  these days on account of time, but which are also enlightening.

These platforms provide access to a wealth of contrastive views on Biafra and other aspects of Nigerian politics, views demonstrated by both the posts by particular people and responses to those posts.

Mgbeke Obi- hard core pro-Biafran

Agha Egwu- hard core pro-Biafran

Charles Ogbu- hard core pro-Biafran. Rich commentator on broad range of national issues. Superb writer.

Nneka Aroh- eloquent summariser of  views on Nigeria's dysfunctionality, with particular reference to how it affects Ndigbo

Mbe Nwaniga- federalist with sympathy for challenges face by Ndigbo

Ena Ofugara- federalist, anti-balkanisation,  with sympathy for challenges faced by Ndigbo

Zainab Usman- Hausa-Fulani scholar advocating for a Biafra referendum [ although she blocked me bcs I insisted on discussing Fulani terrorism, the terrorist alliance between Fulani militia and Hausa-Fulani politicians, as central to the drive by Nigerians to be free of a union where such a govt sponsored dehumanization is possible.

Mohammed Said Jidda- Hausa-Fulani political activist advocating for a Biafra referendum, to my surprise on account of his threat to the life of any Northerner who voted for  GEJ's govt in the 2015 elections.

Chidimma Egwuenu- anti-Biafran, pro-restructuring

Chioma Amaryllis Ahaghotu-anti- Biafran

Mike Ikem Umealo- pro-restructuring and anti- Nnamdi Kanu leadership for Ndigbo

Chukwudi Iwuchukwu- federalist anti-Biafran

Tony Osborg- federalist campaigner for restructuring to true federalism

 Ademola Adigun- federalist

Bello Isiaka- regularly posts rich and provocative updates

Sentinels Facebook group-very articulate group dominated by Hausa-Fulani

Spaces for Change- very articulate Nigeria wide Facebook group

thanks

toyin











To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 13, 2017, 7:28:27 PM6/13/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, usaafricadialogue, Olayinka Agbetuyi

I dont think any one will believe the dominant right wing Hausa Fulani theme of your analysis seeing that two of the crucial 3 arms of government are defacto headed by non- right wing Hausa Fulani ethnicity but by Yoruba indigenes namely Saraki and Osinbajo..

You have also not answered satisfactorily why southern state governments not controlled by the right wing Hausa-Fulani are equalky as corrupt as their northern counterparts.  No one has stopped the Eastern states from putting into practice the eldorado Biafran model in their states.

The only argument of Biafranists which they are disgruntled about and on which they are not forth right about is that of the major groups the Igbo are the only one who have not produced an executive civiluan president.  Paradoxically so long as they hold on atavistically to the vision of Biafra the Nigerian power brokers will always ensure that the position eludes them by making the tenuous link between the Biafranists and the larger Igbo community which you make between the "right wing Hausa Fulani' and the long suffering majority of  innocent northerners.  

In the minds of such power brokers will spring the equation: you cannot rule as president the nation you do not believe in.

Yes, there is injustice in the activities of the Fulani herdsmen; the resolution of that problem is the challenge before the Nigerian legislature headed by Saraki and the executive arm headed by Osinbajo.



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>

Segun Ogungbemi

unread,
Jun 13, 2017, 8:21:01 PM6/13/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com
Ken, 
Yes, Scotland can legally separate through devolution without violence. 
What I think the Ndigbo ought to do is to use the provisions in our constitution to ask for separation from the rest of the country. 
It seems to me that Northern Ireland and Quebec have constitutional provisions for their people who feel they want to separate to go through the process rather than use violence. 
The Biafra agitators have the right to ask for separation from the present Union but in doing so, they must not engage in any ruthless manner that will provoke other ethnic nationalities in the country. 
What we saw in the first Biafra agenda that led to the civil war must not repeat itself. It was awful. 
SO



Sent from my iPhone 

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 14, 2017, 4:36:37 AM6/14/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

Ken.

Devolution in Scotland is the half way solution to PREVENT separation.  

About half of Scots did not believe in separation and that was why the referendum was held.  (SNP lost even more seats to the Conservatives in Scotland in the just concluded elections including Salman who supervised the referendum)

The result of the last general election in the past few weeks now indicate that even FEWER Scots now believe in outright separation than at the time of the referendum. (SNP lost more seats to the Conservatives in Scotland including Salman the Scottish First Minister who organised the referendum.

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 14, 2017, 11:41:24 AM6/14/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

An aside and a slight point of correction - re - "Salman the Scottish First Minister who organised the referendum"

An excursion : The name Salman sticks in the eye of course, because first of all it doesn't sound Scottish, even if these days you never know, since further South, the city of London does have a mayor by the name of Sadiq Khan; but even before then those who fear the emergence of Eurabia have the UK on the map as "North Pakistan"

Well, at least in Shia Islam there's the most famous Salman - Salman al Farsi - i.e. Salman the Persian (whose idea of building a trench contributed to the Muslims victory in the historic "Battle of the Trench." Then there's the most infamous Salman yet, that scoundrel Salman Rushdie (later Knighted by Her Majesty) the author of "The Satanic Verses " which ignited the ire of Iran's First Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khomeini in the form of a literary fatwa : The Death penalty! Some still say that it was an extreme form of literary criticism. And here too we could be talking about a double entendre since in the novel Salman Rushdie appoints Salman the Persian as the Prophet's scribe - ( historically inaccurate) and a mischievous one at that - a scribe who would make slight changes when writing down the revelation - and since the Prophet did not notice his errant editorialising, the scribe was emboldened to experiment with making other changes in his manuscript. A very sensitive matter in terms of historical inaccuracies and considering the inerrancy of the Quran as scripture, a very sensitive matter indeed - so conspiracy theorists could readily believe that Rushdie was an imperial agent hell -bent distorting and disparaging Islam, for which reason he should be punished two times : Hanged, drawn and quartered in this life and then dance on hot coals in the hell-fire, for more than one eternity. Cf. The Latest Decalogue

I read "The Satanic Verses" a few months before the Fatwa was issued and Rush-die of course went underground - as I suppose , you would have done, too (Pikuach nefesh) . Before the Fatwa I thought it was a phantasmagoria battle between good and evil - and had read it mostly because I liked all of Rushdie's earlier stuff , especially because Rushdie did not seem to suffer from that kind of enormous respect for Her Majesty's English , the kind of respect that probably inhibits some writers - and even non writers suffering from grammatical inhibitions. Rushdie cd kick the lingo in the ess without needless " corrections"from Frank, Farooq or France. Ah Rushdie's infamous famous three about the English lass: find her, fuck her and leave her which Ahmed Deedat did go on about.

But to the point. The current First Minister is Nicola Sturgeon and the then First Prime Minister and leader of the Scottish National Party who worked indefatigably for that Referendum was Alex Salmond ( sounds remarkably close to " Alex Salman)

(BTW I was in New York at the time, but I'm told by some of the soul Brothers who represented Sweden at FESTAC in Lagos in 1979 , that when they were asked where they were from they replied, "Sweden" but what their interlocutors heard was "Sudan" - that made more sense to them. The Sweden of both ignorance and the imagination being the place where polar bears come from. In a similar way when asked where do you come from and I answer Sierra Leone, people, especially from the Middle East, then follow up with a second question : Syria ? They must be hard of hearing. Does Syria sound like Sierra Leone? ( True up till today the Lebanese in Sierra Leone are called " Syrians" - they arrived in Sierra Leone more than a hundred years ago, when there was no Lebanon) . Also occasionally - people who have never heard of a country called Sierra Leone follow up my answer with a second question : Surinam? Some others even go a little further : Sri Lanka?

Meriting my asking ; " Do I look like a Tamil tiger?

Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 1:01 AM

Cc: Olayinka Agbetuyi
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra
Obi:

Let me be forthright with you:  You are rhe same age as my youngest sister who holds the same doctorate degree as you do and if she argues in the same vacuous way that you do she knows I would disown her. Agbetuyis dont argue like babies.  

You debase the qualifications you hold with the irresponsible line of argument you pursue which has made you the laughing stock of the forum.  I tried my best to shield you from attack by exasperated members but you are your own worst enemy.

Did you read the piece byJibrin
Ibrahim on perception of marginalization by ethnicities in Nigeria?  Why is the case of Igbo unique and why must a section of the Igbo continually blackmail the rest of Nigeria with secession to wrest more than their just due from the federation. 

 I repeat any such Igbo must feel free to withraw to Igboland to continue to deal only with fellow Igbo and leave the other responsible Igbo who realize that living is a question of give and take with other people to continue with their livelihoods in any part of Nigeria in a spirit of give and take.

If there is any act of violence against the persons of such Igbo I can guarantee that we the conscientious non Igbo will be their first line of defence and that they dont need such bigoted, prebendal, self-seeking, pretencious, ethnic jingoist and rabble rousers as yourself as champions of their interests.  

Speak only for your jaundiced self as Obi Nwakama and not for the Igbo.  I have more Igbo real friends than you do!



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Rex Marinus <rexma...@hotmail.com>
Date: 10/06/2017 06:59 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Agbetuyi, you did not get the hint of reproach in Chidi and Ken Harrow's retort. The first thing that comes to your mind when the Igbo protest, or raise a voice to complain about their situation, is Igbo bodies slaughtered across Nigeria and trucked back to the East. Why do you conceive of that kind of carnage when it comes to the Igbo? Why do you have to kill the Igbo for political speech, for asking for justice, or for actually asking for recognition of the equality of all Nigerians failing which separation? Why is it that the only Igbo who has to stay alive in your mind is the silent Igbo, or the prostrate Igbo, or the malleable Igbo, or the Igbo who is merely "photo-on-the wall"? Now you say, "Amen!" But "Amen!" to what? To a Freudian slip? I will only ask you to be very careful with what you wish for. The Igbo are very angry and are not looking again to be slaughtered. We must make every effort to allow peace, secure it, and avoid every urge to engage in slaughter, so that we do not open the kind of dangerous floodgate Ken Harrow has alluded to. You must note this however: the Igbo are not willing to live in Nigeria as "conquered" people, or people who "surrendered" their rights with war. If seeking justice in Nigeria means  slaughter of the Igbo, then you must gird your loins with hardier cloth, and you must be prepared to kill them all. But I just hope that more civilized, more humane, and more tolerant impulses prevail, and not the impulses that dream about scattered Igbo body parts ferried home for burials. 

Obi Nwakanma





Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 10:53 PM

Cc: Olayinka Agbetuyi
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra


Amen!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 09/06/2017 22:39 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

(Peaceful)separatist agitations don't have to result to people being slaughtered.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.


Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

Kenneth Harrow

unread,
Jun 14, 2017, 12:12:17 PM6/14/17
to usaafricadialogue
rushdie’s novel was a novel, and a pretty great one.
Cornelius, you need to really emphasize that point, the right for authors of fiction to be blasphemers in the eyes of some people, probably not of their real readers. The right to saw blasphemy is basic, it is fundamental to being human with other humans in the world.
We don’t have the right to suppress blasphemy; we do have the right to suppress shouting fire in a theater. The line between the two is a difficult one to parse, but difficult doesn’t mean impossible, it means human
Ken

Kenneth Harrow

Dept of English and Film Studies

Michigan State University

619 Red Cedar Rd

East Lansing, MI 48824

517-803-8839

har...@msu.edu

http://www.english.msu.edu/people/faculty/kenneth-harrow/

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 14, 2017, 2:26:41 PM6/14/17
to usaafricadialogue
On Igbo Presidency and Plurality of Igbo Perspectives on Biafra

The Igbo Presidency vision is far from the Biafra dream. An Igbo Nigerian President remains bound by the same strictures that make Nigeria a structurally failed state. 

Igbo ethnicity is not equatable with the Biafra vision. Some Igbos want to remain in Nigeria, and would be happy with an Igbo Presidency. Some Igbos want to remain in Nigeria but demand a restructuring of the nation. Some insist that  failing restructuring, secession must follow. Some are convinced that all avenues have been exhausted  and secession is the only option left. Some hold that the secession demand is a way to get restructuring, being the lesser evil in the minds of those who want to uphold the status quo. Others hold that only secession is acceptable in any circumstances.

We should read what pro-Biafra advocates think  and see what they have to say for themselves.

For those who wish to read these debates among Igbos  for and agst Biafra, you could see Chidimma Egwuenu's Facebook status update of 9th June 2017 and the responses to the post.

The general view, though, seems to be that the political elite in general and the right wing Hausa-Fulani in particular, do want restructuring, talk less secession, bcs the current system is working well for them. The attorney general has made it clear that restructuring is not on the table.

I dont see the Biafra vision dying in the absence of radical changes in the name of equity in the political/economic and social structuring of Nigeria.

I wont repeat myself on the difference btw the current SE govt and the Biafra vision bcs I have made the point sufficientely and dont want to fall into the trap of debates that make no progress.

On the Strategies of Pro-Biafra Groups

Even though the dominant pro-Biafra group, IPOB uses only non-violent methods, and the other groups have hardly recorded any violent action, critics of the Biafra vision keep invoking war in connection with the contemporary struggle for Biafra.

The IPOB leader was imprisoned for two years by the Buhari govt  but his supporters restricted themselves to peaceful protests even after being massacred in cold blood by the army while praying in a church.

During the GEJ era, bodies of people who may have members of a pro-Biafra group were found floating in a river in the SE but no violent action was taken in retaliation.

Members of a pro-Biafra group, if I recall correctly, were arrested for trying to hold up a radio station during the GEJ era, that being the most violent act I have read being committed by any of these groups.

What has placed Biafra in the national conversation is the risk Kanu took in making himself available for imprisonment by the Nigerian authorities, 'bait' which they took, and remaining in prison for two years. He thus moved from being a relatively unknown factor to a central player.

The 30th May sit-at-home demonstration by SE Igbos suggests that the bail conditions attached to his release might be meaningless since he does nor even need to leave his house to effect broad ranging action.

With the sit-at-home, a powerful force has been tapped, the same that Gandhi used in India and Martin Luther King jr in the US.

To what degree can the pro-Biafra goups effect secession through the democratic process, involving possibly involving amending the constitution to allow for secession, since there is described to be no provision for secession in the constitution?  What are the chances of even the restructuring camp achieving their goals? Are the political elite on board with these aspirations? Can they be brought on board? What about the alleged numerical superiority of the North in the legislative houses described as achieved through manipulation of local council allocations and census figures, enabling the voting block to shut down proposals they dont approve of? On account of the vocal and consistent resistance of the North to either restructuring or secession, what would be the way out in the ensuing legislative deadlock?

So say that whatever other regions say, the only way the North will allow either restructuring or secession is if they are forced to do so bcs they are ready to go to war to prevent either. The IG of police responded to the Biafra remembrance day sit at home  by issuing  threats  agst  any disruptors  of the peace. The Kaduna Declaration tried to decelerate or stop the Biafra momentum through the illegal and ridiculous action of giving Igbos a 3 month deadline to leave the North, after which their huge material investments there will be forfeited and all Northerners-whose investments in the East might not be equal that of half of Igbos in the North-to leave the East.

I anticipate more muscle flexing from the fed govt and the Muslim North. I expect IPOB will proceed to apply its nonviolent methods of asserting power in such a way that its members can't be targeted as they have been before now in the previous massacre of its members by the army, civil disobedience techniques like the sit at home and the projected (?)  boycotting of the Anambra elections, perhaps to delegitimize political activity in the SE under the present arrangement and eventually force acceptance of their vision and a referendum through the force of the sheer nos responding favorably to their calls for civil disobedience. Will the Kaduna Declaration slow down or eliminate this strategy out of fear of huge displacement and massive economic loss by Igbos in the North?  What options are available to make the secession option less attractive, apart from  strategies of intimidation? Some are suggesting an Igbo Presidency even though the 2019 Presidency is locked into the North through the zoning by  both PDP and APC, the two major parties. Voices for restructuring may be seen as  increasing in volume among Ndigbo after the Kaduna Declaration but even restructuring is declared a no go area by the fed govt.


On Political Office and Political Power

Is political power exercised purely by placing people in particular positions? What is the level of power that can be exercised by those position?

What is one to say in this context about  the 2017 budget? Was it not signed by Osinbajo, the VP from the SW?  Did it not pass through Saraki, the Senate President from Kwara state, though a region Islamised by the Fulani Jihad? Is the description of half of the budget as allocated to the North Central a fiction? Why did the reps from all other regions not cry out?  I am still assessing how factual this chart is, but here it is for your examination-

                                                       




Why did Buhari's letter to the legislature indicating his going on leave describe Osinbajo as coordinator of the economy and not acting president? Why is Buhari's health status a closely guarded secret in the face of obvious fears of the repeat of a GEJ-Yaradua scenario after all the terrible effort made-from providing ideological and perhaps material and logistical support to Boko Haram to Shettima's enabling of the Chibok kidnap saga by keeping that remote school open agst fed govt orders to the Buhari repackaging through the APC alliance to the Northernisation of the leadership of all security agencies and INEC- all to achieve the post 2011 mantra of "power must return to the North?"

While you happily celebrate your country where all works well or has institutions that enable things work well, I expect Osinbajo and his family are on 24/7 prayer for his life since fate has placed him in the eye of the vampires who could stop at nothing to make sure he does not replace their anointed son or their ethnic allocation and the benefits it provides for them, whatever the constitution says abt the VP replacing an incapacitated President.

On the Untouchable Status of Fulani Herdsmen, the Advance Guard of Fulani Terrorism

Have you read Osinbajo or Saraki having anything  or anything substantial to say about the so called herdsmen, talk less taking action to permanently stop their murderous  activities ? Everyone knows what they stand for and so most political players keep their peace bcs they want to survive.

Even people like senator Ben Bruce who used to make proposals about how to address the problem have fallen silent after the Hausa-Fulani politicians, apexed by national ruler Buhari made clear their alliance with the terror group through action and eloquent inaction and silence in the face of the massacres committed and openly justified by the terrorists.  It took Fayose to initiate the self help strategies represented by state controlled militia and state enacted laws  that are the first answer to the problem, a move other states are emulating

 It is under the noses of Osinbajo, Saraki, Ekweremadu and others that grass was imported to pacify the vampires by feeding their cows and efforts were made to seize lands across the nation to ranch these cows after the failure of the effort to seize land across the nation to create grazing routes for these private business people whose ethnic kin dominate much of the Nigerian political space.

 I wonder if you are not aware of these developments.

​thanks

toyin​






On 14 June 2017 at 16:34, Olayinka Agbetuyi <yagb...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ken.

Devolution in Scotland is the half way solution to PREVENT separation.  

About half of Scots did not believe in separation and that was why the referendum was held.  (SNP lost even more seats to the Conservatives in Scotland in the just concluded elections including Salman who supervised the referendum)

The result of the last general election in the past few weeks now indicate that even FEWER Scots now believe in outright separation than at the time of the referendum. (SNP lost more seats to the Conservatives in Scotland including Salman the Scottish First Minister who organised the referendum.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Kenneth Harrow <har...@msu.edu>
Date: 12/06/2017 00:59 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Segun, scotland can legally separate through devolution, can’t it? Is that an option for biafra?
Other similar questions for quebec, and for northern ireland. aren’t they different, legally?
ken

Kenneth Harrow

Dept of English and Film Studies

Michigan State University

619 Red Cedar Rd

East Lansing, MI 48824

517-803-8839

har...@msu.edu

http://www.english.msu.edu/people/faculty/kenneth-harrow/


Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 14, 2017, 4:13:46 PM6/14/17
to usaafricadialogue
EDITED


On Igbo Presidency and Plurality of Igbo Perspectives on Biafra

The Igbo Presidency vision is far from the Biafra dream. An Igbo Nigerian President remains bound by the same strictures that make Nigeria a structurally failed state. 

Igbo ethnicity is not equatable with the Biafra vision. Some Igbos want to remain in Nigeria, and would be happy with an Igbo Presidency. One view hopes that an Igbo President would drive restructuring while another holds that the process through which one becomes President of Nigeria and the various political frameworks that define the role make such as aspiration for a fundamentally reformist President unrealistic. Some Igbos want to remain in Nigeria but demand a restructuring of the nation. Some insist that  failing restructuring, secession must follow. Some are convinced that all avenues have been exhausted  and secession is the only option left. Some hold that the secession demand is a way to get restructuring, being the lesser evil in the minds of those who want to uphold the status quo. Others hold that only secession is acceptable in any circumstances.

We should read what Igbos  have to say for themselves.

For those who wish to read these debates among Igbos  for and agst Biafra, you could see Chidimma Egwuenu's Facebook status update of 9th June 2017 and the responses to the post.

The general view, though, seems to be that the political elite in general and the right wing Hausa-Fulani in particular, do not  want restructuring, talk less secession, bcs the current system is working well for them. The attorney general has made it clear that restructuring is not on the table.

I dont see the Biafra vision dying in the absence of radical changes in the name of equity in the political/economic and social structuring of Nigeria.

 I have made the point sufficiently that the current SE govts, operating under the parasitic Nigerian political and economic system, and run by elites enabled by that system, is not identical with the Biafra vision, a revolutionary initiative that seeks to transform the political and economic framework of the Igbo centred states.


On the Strategies of Pro-Biafra Groups

Even though the dominant pro-Biafra group, IPOB, uses only non-violent methods, and the other groups have hardly recorded any violent action, critics of the Biafra vision keep invoking war in connection with the contemporary struggle for Biafra.

Such invocations involve the controversial view suggested by Segun's 'The Biafra agitators have the right to ask for separation from the present Union but in doing so, they must not engage in any ruthless manner that will provoke other ethnic nationalities in the country. What we saw in the first Biafra agenda that led to the civil war must not repeat itself. It was awful.'

Biafra was declared in response to the legislative moves of the fed govt after the fed govt reneged on its own restructuring agreements at the Aburi Accord, Igbos having fled to the SE for refuge after the massacre of thousands of Igbos in the North in revenge for the 1966 coup in which Igbo officers played leading roles and which decimated the cream of Yoruba and Northern military and political elite and spared those of Ndigbo. The long range goal of the coup remains controversial and Biafra was a response to the massacres of Igbos and maneuvers by the fed govt following the coup rather than a vision projected ab initio.

The first group to launch an attack after the declaration of Biafra was the fed govt, not Biafra.

In the present struggle, the IPOB leader was imprisoned for two years by the Buhari govt in spite of his being granted bail   but his supporters restricted themselves to peaceful protests even after being massacred in cold blood by the army while praying in a church.


During the GEJ era, bodies of people who may have members of a pro-Biafra group were found floating in a river in the SE but no violent action was taken in retaliation.

Members of a pro-Biafra group, if I recall correctly, were arrested for trying to hold up a radio station during the GEJ era, that being the most violent act I have read being committed by any of these groups.

What has placed Biafra in the national conversation is the risk Kanu took in making himself available for imprisonment by the Nigerian authorities, 'bait' which they took, and remaining in prison for two years. He thus moved from being a relatively unknown factor to a central player.

The 30th May sit-at-home demonstration by SE Igbos suggests that the bail conditions attached to his release might be meaningless since he does nor even need to leave his house to effect broad ranging action.

With the sit-at-home, a powerful force has been tapped, the same that Gandhi used in India and Martin Luther King jr in the US.

To what degree can the pro-Biafra goups effect secession through the democratic process, involving possibly  amending the constitution to allow for secession, since there is described to be no provision for secession in the constitution?  What are the chances of even the restructuring camp achieving their goals? Are the political elite on board with these aspirations? Can they be brought on board? What about the alleged numerical superiority of the North in the legislative houses described as achieved through manipulation of local council allocations and census figures, enabling the voting block to shut down proposals they dont approve of? On account of the vocal and consistent resistance of the North to either restructuring or secession, what would be the way out in the ensuing legislative deadlock?

Some say that whatever other regions want, the only way the North will allow either restructuring or secession is if they are forced to do so bcs they are ready to go to war to prevent either. The IG of police responded to the Biafra remembrance day sit-at-home directive   by issuing  threats  agst  any disruptors  of the peace. The Kaduna Declaration may be seen as  trying to decelerate or stop the Biafra momentum through the illegal and ridiculous action-ridiculous bcs people live and work in countries other than their own, and Igbo ethnicity is not synonymous with aspiration to Biafra- of giving Igbos a 3 month deadline to leave the North, after which their huge material investments there will be forfeited and all Northerners-whose investments in the East might not be equal to half that of Igbos in the North-to leave the East.

I anticipate more muscle flexing from the fed govt and the Muslim North. I expect IPOB will continue  to apply its nonviolent methods of asserting power in such a way that its members can't be targeted as they have been before now in the previous massacre of its members by the army, methods of civil disobedience techniques like the sit-at-home and the projected (?)  boycotting of the Anambra elections, perhaps to delegitimize political activity in the SE under the present arrangement and eventually force acceptance of their vision and compel a referendum through the force of the sheer nos responding favorably to their calls for civil disobedience.

Will the Kaduna Declaration slow down or eliminate this strategy out of fear of huge displacement and massive economic loss by Igbos in the North?  What options are available to make the secession option less attractive, apart from  strategies of intimidation? Some are suggesting an Igbo Presidency even though the 2019 Presidency is locked into the North through the zoning by  both PDP and APC, the two major parties. Voices for restructuring may be seen as  increasing in volume among Ndigbo after the Kaduna Declaration but even restructuring is declared a no go area by the fed govt.


On Political Office and Political Power

Is political power exercised purely by placing people in particular positions? What is the level of power that exercised by the people in those position?

What is one to say in this context about  the 2017 budget? Was it not signed by Osinbajo, the VP from the SW?  Did it not pass through Saraki, the Senate President from Kwara state, though a region Islamised by the Fulani Jihad? Is the description of half of the budget as allocated to the North Central a fiction? Why did the reps from all other regions not cry out?  I am still assessing how factual this chart is, but here it is for your examination-

                                                       




Why did Buhari's letter to the legislature indicating his going on leave describe Osinbajo as coordinator  and not acting president? Why is Buhari's health status a closely guarded secret in the face of obvious fears of the repeat of a GEJ-Yaradua scenario after all the terrible effort made-from providing ideological and perhaps material and logistical support to Boko Haram enabling the 2011 anti-govt based escalation of the group's activities,  to Borno state governor Kassim Shettima's enabling of the Chibok kidnap saga by keeping that remote school open agst fed govt orders to the Buhari repackaging through the APC alliance to the Northernisation of the leadership of all security agencies and INEC by Buhri on reaching the Presidency- all to achieve the post 2011 mantra of "power must return to the North?"

While some happily celebrate their country that  has institutions that enable things work well, I expect Osinbajo and his family are on 24/7 prayer for his life since fate has placed him in the eye of the vampires who could stop at nothing to make sure he does not replace their anointed son or their ethnic allocation and the benefits it provides for them, whatever the constitution says abt the VP replacing an incapacitated President.

On the Untouchable Status of Fulani Herdsmen, the Advance Guard of Fulani Terrorism

Has anyone  read or heard Osinbajo  as VPor Saraki as Senate President having anything  at all or anything substantial to say about the so called herdsmen, talk less taking action to permanently stop their murderous  activities ? Everyone knows what the Fulani herdsmen  stand for and so most political players keep their peace on the subject bcs they want to survive.

Even people like senator Ben Bruce who used to make proposals about how to address the problem have fallen silent after the Hausa-Fulani politicians, apexed by national ruler Buhari made clear their alliance with the terror group through action and eloquent inaction and silence in the face of the massacres committed and openly justified by the terrorists.  It took aggressive opposition Ekiti state governor Ayodele Fayose to initiate the self help strategies represented by state controlled militia and state enacted laws  that are the first answer to the problem, a move other states are emulating

 It is under the noses of Osinbajo, Saraki and Ekweremadu as Deputy Senate President  and others that grass was imported to pacify the vampires by feeding their cows and efforts were made to seize lands across the nation to ranch these cows after the failure of the move to appropriate  land across the Nigeria  to create grazing routes for these private business people whose ethnic kin dominate much of the Nigerian political space.

Are we to pretend not to be aware  of these developments bcs we desire to appear detribalised in the face of what is obviously tribally mobilized military and political warfare?

​thanks


toyin​

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 14, 2017, 4:13:59 PM6/14/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, usaafricadialogue, Olayinka Agbetuyi

That Biafra was birthed in the context of war is an incontestable fact of history.

Nzegwu and his colleagues NEVER mentioned Biafra in the manifesto of their 'revolution.'


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Date: 14/06/2017 19:26 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue <USAAfric...@googlegroups.com>
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 14, 2017, 4:36:02 PM6/14/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, usaafricadialogue, Olayinka Agbetuyi

The first group to attack was not the fed govt but Biafra.  

The very declaration of Biafra was an act of war against the Constitution and the sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in the same way that the secessionist gambit of Boko Haram was a declaration of war against the sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

In the current scenario the Biafranists should continue to pursue non violent means and not take compromising gambles such as highjack of radio stations until a credible referendum can be organised in the area where Biafra will be located.

All the talk of if Biafranists are forced to do this or that should cease as force will only be countered by force.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Date: 14/06/2017 21:13 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue <USAAfric...@googlegroups.com>
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 14, 2017, 8:47:57 PM6/14/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

Dear Ken,

Let me thank you, thank your patience and tolerance in advance, for putting up with the kind of answer I suspect that I'm going to give : More questions.

I want to at least satisfy my conscience. Con-science

"Everybody who read the Jungle Book knows that Riki tiki tavi's a mongoose who kills snakes.
Well
, when I was a young man I was led to believe there were organisations to kill my snakes for me, i.e. the church, i.e. the government , i.e. the school. But when I got a little older I learned I had to kill them myself" ( Donovan : Riki Tiki Tavi

At primary school (in Fulham ) I learned a rime which began

"Sticks and stones may break my bones , but words can't hurt me"

Another version is "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never break me"

They tried to instil that kind of attitude in us at school , not least of all to avert the fist fights that were a daily occurrence in the playground - between friends, sometimes directly after playing/ sharing marbles. For the sensitives (many dimensions), be they Joos (another spelling, don't take offence) Christians (another faith) or Muslims (other believers), another truth could be, "Sticks and stones may break my bones and words can also hurt me"

Because words have meanings, trajectories, they can therefore cause offence and offence can have consequences -

such as that once upon a time a contract

was put out by Iran's supreme head

on Rushdie's head -

they wanted him not alive

in the name of Allah subhana ta'ala

they wanted Rushdie dead...

Still don't know if there's any truth to "Muhammad’s dead poets society" as precedent.

One practical reason could have been the danger of fifth columnists.

Consider - and this is authoritative about the Prophet of Islam ( s.a.w.) : "The number of the campaigns which he led in person during the last ten years of his life is twenty-seven, in nine of which there was hard fighting. The number of the expeditions which he planned and sent out under other leaders is thirty-eight." Read on...

The venerable Toyin Vincent Adepoju made the following apparently rational assertion in this forum:

"My own response to these concerns  is that Allah, the creator of the universe, does not need to be defended  from humans."

A few years later he re-framed the assertion in what he hoped was a rhetorical question:

" Does God or Allah need to be defended, or protected by us, mere mortals, who are his creation?"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/USAAfricaDialogue/ADepoju$20$3A$20does$20Allah$20need$20to$20be$20defended%7Csort:relevance/usaafricadialogue/JaPapADViNc/A2FTZL61BQAJ

There is no easy answer. Should the laws that apply in this forum, about name-calling and the danger of descending to "the primitive moment" also apply to Literature? I am inclined to agree with you - but - BUT we cannot legislate away the predictable/ unpredictable consequences - no more than murder is prevented because the Almighty has legislated through His revelation at Mt. Sinai, " Thou shalt not kill"

Judaism has it's own law of blasphemy (only God can be blasphemed) and in Islam this extends to vilification of all those that Islam regards as prophets too - Jesus, King David, King Solomon, Lukman - although the honour due to the Prophet of Islam seems to be more jealously protected than that of any other Prophet. So in Stockholm a few years ago there was the Ecco Homo exhibition without anybody coming to any grievous bodily harm or death at the hands of some Muslims...

As for me , having made a precautionary distinction between suicide and Martyrdom, I don't know how far I would resist torture and the threat of immediate death (as in the case of Sabbatai Zevi) when it comes to defending the Almighty's honour as per Kiddush Hashem ...

Some fifteen years ago subscribed to one of the freedoms being promoted by David Horowitz : the right to be able to critique religion without falling foul of religious authority, in some cases the death penalty...

The problem of religious language and anti-religion language causing offence will only evaporate after science has the upper-hand. I came to this conclusion exactly this evening - we ( two Scrabble freaks, Ken Baskin ( African-American) Lefifi Tladi ( back in town from Pretoria, South Africa ) and yours truly, Cornelius Shalom Aleichem (Abeokuta City) had finished five games of Scrabble this evening when the conversation turned to religion - during our sets of Scrabble I had quoted from today's Forum :

"Thinking a thing in English is thinking English about a thing"- Ngugi wa Thiong'o as I told them that Nigerians are now taking over the English language sphere as world Champion in Scrabble and that last year's world champion was beaten badly in Lagos this year by some other Nigerians and that before Nigeria took over the French had had their turn as world champion of the English word game (My guys had two Scrabble dictionaries which were consulted occasionally. ( By the way Ken - "ger" has not yet found its way into those dictionaries, but "gerah" has.) I told them that I'm sure that the Nigerian professionals would have memorised those dictionaries forwards and backwards by now, so what are we waiting for? Well obviously these guys are word-men and worldly too, so, soon enough they were spouting cosmology, evolution - I swear that if some White Folks had eavesdropped on us it would have confirmed their cherished prejudices - at one point they were uniformly agreed that (evolution) didn't I know that ( preposterous suggestion) it was three monkey sitting in Ken's kitchen right on top of Stockholm, top floor, playing Scrabble. Do monkeys have souls? I asked them. (Well the Pakistani and Indian Muslims want to ridicule Hinduism's Hanuman who it is their wont to refer to as " the monkey god". Maybe there should be a law against that too.

If it were left up to me, should a guy like Lars Vilks ever arrive in Riyadh or Tehran he should be given ten good lashes on his bare bottom, right there at the airport and asked if he would like some more.


I must get up now - ( had haemorrhoids this morning) - sitting too long at the computer. Looked at myself in the mirror this morning and could not say like Jesus, (John 14: 9 ) : " he that hath seen me hath seen the Father" considered a blasphemy by the Pharisaic authorities of the day and a capital offence.


I wish that I could have said, " I am an old scholar, better looking now than when I was young. That’s what sitting on your ass does to your face." (Beautiful Losers)

Still happy, I leave you with the title song of this album : Gorilla...


So long,


Cornelius

Current archives at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue';return tru

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Jun 15, 2017, 8:32:28 AM6/15/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Biafra secessionist venture has nothing to do with restructuring of Nigeria from unitary to pure federalism. Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju, will cure himself of phobia for what he constantly refer to as Hausa/Fulani domination, if he bothers to acquaint himself with history of Nigeria. Who propagated for unitary central government in Nigeria and when was it implemented and by who?


The National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroon (NCNC), as it was known in the 1950s, led by Nnamdi Azikiwe propagated for a unitary constitution for Nigeria which was strongly opposed by the Action Group (AG) led by Obafemi Awolowo. He expatiated, "As between the various ethnic groups, I argued, there were differing standards of civilisation as well as uneven stages in the adoption of western education and the emulation of western civilisation. A unitary constitution with only central government would only result in frustration to the much push-ful and more dynamic ethnic groups, whereas the division of the country into regions along ethnic lines would enable each linguistic group not only to develop its own peculiar culture and institutions but to move forward at its own pace, without being unnecessarily pushed or annoyingly slowed down by the others (Chapter 12, EVOLUTION OF A FEDERALIST in AWO : The Autobiography of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, p. 164-165)." For opting for Federal constitutional  government in Nigeria, Nnamdi Azikiwe and his NCNC branded Awolowo a fascist who wanted to balkanise Nigeria and he called Federalism, Pakistanization.


After the 1959 Federal election, none of the political parties secured a majority to rule at the centre. Awolowo stated plainly that he could serve in a national federal government led by Nnamdi Azikiwe, but not in the one led by a feudalist. NCNC and AG together had 164 seats as against NPC 148 in the House of Representatives. However, Azikiwe entered not only into a coalition government with the NPC, but also conceded the post of the Prime Minister to Abubakar Tafawa Balewa on the belief that since Northerners had no so much educated people, the Igbo would control all the apparatus of governance in the country. Truly, as Chinua Achebe confirmed on p.66 of his book, There Was  a Country, the Igbo led the nation in virtually every sector - politics, education, commerce and the arts, the achievements made possible by the NCNC coalition government with the less educated Northerners. The Deputy leader of Action Group and Premier of Western Region drew attention of Awolowo to the ethnic lop-sidedness in the recruitments and appointments in the federal public service and parastatals against the Yoruba and urged Awolowo to join a national government led by Balewa, so that the Yoruba could get their share of federal appointments. Awolowo replied that officials were to work for the entire nation and not alone for their respective tribes. That was the major cause of conflict between Akintola and Awolowo. When the Yoruba Kings (Oba) summoned both of them to a reconciliation meeting, Akintola spoke in Yoruba to describe the impossibility of Awolowo's ideology of democratic socialism. He said, "TÍ A BÁ DÉ IBI TÍ ERÁNKO PÉJO SÍ, NSÉ LÃ'WÁ OHÚN T'ÓJÒRÙ FÍ HA IDI; TÍ OBÁ SÉ BI ÈNÌYÀN LÃRIN ERÁNKO, WON YIO WULÈ PÁ ONI." Literarily translated, it means, "When you are in the midst of animals, pretend to be like them because if you try to behave like human beings, the animals would kill you for nothing. What Akintola said implied that Awolowo should be as tribal as Azikiwe and his NCNC by joining the national government led by Abubakar Tafawa Balewa. Everywhere in Lagos is SÚKU-SÙKU, Akintola said, if you go to Lagos. SÚKU-SÙKU was Akintola's euphemism for the Igbo shortened  name, Chukwu. The dispute over joining the federal government by the Action Group was exploited by the NCNC/NPC coalition government to overthrow the government of Western Region controlled by the AG. The crisis that followed, led to the two coups of 15 January 1966 in which Major General Johnson Thompson Aguiyi Ironsi triumphed as the Military Head of State.


Traditionally, a military coup is usually followed by the release of political prisoners jailed by the ousted regime, immediately after take over. Ironsi dumped that tradition by not releasing Awolowo and others jailed by the NPC/NCNC regime. Instead, he appointed Francis Nwokedi as one-man commission of inquiry  on a unitary form of government in Nigeria. In his Budget broadcast of 31st March 1966, and before Nwokedi submitted his report on unitary form of government in Nigeria, Aguiyi Ironsi said among other things that, "I am convinced that the bulk of our people want a united Nigeria and that they want in future one government and not a multitude of governments." By the end of April 1966, Francis Nwokedi had submitted his one-man constitutional review in which he recommended the abolition of the Regions. Despite oppositions, Ironsi promulgated Decree No. 34 of May 24, 1966, to establish unitary form of government in Nigeria. On May 28, 1966, riot broke out throughout Northern Nigeria in protest against unitary government. Since the NCNC manifesto had always advocated unitary form of government in Nigeria, many considered Ironsi's decree No. 34 as implementing NCNC political agenda. By coincidence, NCNC was mainly an Igbo party and with Decree No. 34, many Nigerians regarded the military take-over as an Igbo coup. In addition the refusal of Ironsi to release Awolowo from prison was alluded to his well-known opposition to the unitary form of government and releasing him before decree No. 34 was well established beyond reversal was dangerous to the regime. Two months after Decree No. 34 Ironsi was overthrown in a bloody coup but subsequent regimes retained Aguiyi Ironsi's unitary form of government in the Federal Republic of Nigeria.


The overthrow of Ironsi eventually led to civil war that ended thirty months after it started. The current  Igbo led resuscitators of Biafra are claiming that since the end of the civil  war, the Igbo people have been  marginalized, reduced to second class citizens, oppressed and treated as a conquered people in Nigeria. It is extremely ridiculous that a group who claims to be marginalized, oppressed, treated as conquered people and reduced to a second class citizens would have produced the Vice President of Nigeria in the person of Dr. Alex Ekwueme, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Edwin Ume Ezeoke, Presidents of the Senate - Chuba Okadigbo, Evans Enwerem, Adolf Wabara, and Anyim Pius Anyim, and Deputy Senate Presisent Ekweremandu. The Minister of Finance and Economic Planning under Babangida was Dr. Kalu Idika Kalu and many Igbo enjoyed juicy appointments under General Babangida to the effect that Ohaneze Ndigbo conferred the traditional title of Ogugua Ndigbo on him. There was a  Minister of Finance under President Obasanjo named Okonjo Iweala. The Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria then was Charles Chukwuma Soludo just as Kingsley Moghalu had been Deputy Governor of CBN. Chief Chukwuemeka Ezeife was Special Adviser to Obasanjo on Political matters while Andy Ubah was a Special Adviser in the Presidency. Obasanjo's Minister of Aviation was Kema Chikwe and the Minister of Defence after Theophilus Danjuma was the son of Aguiyi Ironsi. Under President Jonathan, the Chief Economic Adviser to the President was Dr. Nwanze Okedigbe. Once again Dr. Ngozi Okonjo Iweala was not only Jonathan's Minister of Finance but Coordinating Minister of Economy. And when Sanusi Lamido was driven out of the Central Bank as the Governor, he was replaced by Godwin Emefiele. In fact, what had to do with the Finance and Economy of Nigeria under Jonathan was controlled by persons of Igbo ethnic group. Director General of Budget Office was Bright Okogwu; Director General of Bureau of Public Procurement, was Emeka Eze; Director General of Bureau of Public Enterprises was Benjamin Ezra Dikki; Director General of Security Exchange Commission was Arunma Oteh; Director General of Nigerian Security Exchange was Oscar Onyeama; MD of AMCON was Chike Obi; MD of Sovereign Wealth Fund was Uche Orji; Director General of Housing Fund was Sunny Iroha; Managing Director of Bank of Industry was Evelyn Oputa; Chairman of  Investments, Securities Tribunals was Nnenna Orji; Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF) was Anyim Pius Anyim; Director General of Pension Commission(PENCOM) was Chinelu Onuoha; and Director General of Debt Management Office (DMO) was Dr. Abraham Nwankwo. Lest we forget, Jonathan's Minister of Aviation was Stella Adaeze Oduah and because of official malfeasance she was replaced with Osita Chidoka. Professor Bath Naji was Minister of Power but when he attempted to sell PHCN to his proxy company, he was removed and replaced with Professor Chinedu  Ositadinma Ndubusi Nebo, while Dr. Sam Amadi was the Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission. Since Abacha time up to May 29, 2015, Wilson Orakwe Emeka Offor had been the sole government contractor awarded Turn Around Maintenance of Nigeria's four oil refineries for billions of dollars so that they would be able to refine 445,000 barrels of crude oil per day to meet domestic consumption. The list of important positions held by persons of Igbo ethnic group can infinitely be long, nevertheless, I stop here to mention that the Chief Of Army Staff under Jonathan for a long period was General Azubuike Onyeabor Ihejirika  before he was replaced with Alex Badeh. Viewing the above narratives it is a heightened self-induced paranoia for any Igbo to claim that the Igbo people have been marginalized in Nigeria since the end of the civil war.


Since Nigeria returned to civil rule in 1999, Southerners in the persons of Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan have ruled Nigeria as President for eight and six years respectively, totalling fourteen years. Rather than restructuring into true federalism, they enjoyed ruling with the unitary constitution that concentrates power at the centre. The impoverishment of the Nigerian masses have been perpetrated by the political elites from all, and indeed major, ethnic groups in Nigeria. It is the Nigerian masses that have been marginalized and oppressed by the alliance of ethno-religious groups governing the country. Instead of holding the ruling elites accountable for the mismanagement of our national incomes and resources, resuscitators of secession are helping to divert attentions from national looters and plunderers. All along, IPOB, MASSOB and BIM have preached openly not only for an Igbo Republic but for a Biafra that will include satellite none Igbo ethnic groups beyond Igbo ethnic natural territory. Interestingly, none of the Igbo political and business billionaires cautioned or warned the Igbo ethnic supremacists demanding for secession. Rather, they attribute the agitation for Biafra to the marginalization of the Igbo in Nigeria. In the online Nigerian Guardian of June 9, 2013, the then President General of Ohaneze Ndigbo, Chief Gary Enwo Igariwey, was quoted as saying, "We have the population and the Igbo are the only people with over a 25 per cent spread in any part of this country. We are not underdogs under any circumstances, we have the capacity to decide who can be president or who cannot be because we have the numbers." It cannot be denied that the Igbo are everywhere in Nigeria, something that would have been impossible if they are hated and persecuted by their host communities in other parts of Nigeria as it is being politically touted. Now, when the Arewa Youth reciprocated to the IPOB and MASSOB's agitation for secession in what can be termed as Mutually Assured Ethnic Destruction, by demanding that all Igbo in the North should leave the North within three months and all Northerners in the Southeast should leave at the same time, hell broke loose. The Arewa Youth ultimatum is very intelligent because it will deescalate ethnic war threat that have been constantly chanted by IPOB and MASSOB for some years now. If all Igbo in Nigeria return to the Southeast, other Nigerians in the Southeast will not consider Igboland safe for them and will automatically leave, resulting in an Igbo Republic. The Arewa Youth ultimatum is not different from the order of MASSOB, in 2015, to all Igbo in other parts of Nigeria to return to Igboland. see http://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/11/return-the-south-east-massob-tells-igbo. On the 25 November 2015, the National Director of Information,  MASSOB, Mr. Uchenna Madu directed Ndigbo residing outside Igboland to start returning to their homeland and he gave reasons for his directive. http://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/11/biafra-agitation-reveals-seast-neglect-marginalization-igbo-leaders. Yet between 1999 and 2015, the Southeast received 17 trillion naira as revenue allocations from the Federal government. Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju, will probably be able to help us with the information of how much income Nigeria has earned between 1999 and 2015 and how much money each state in Nigeria has derived from revenue allocations shared by the Federal Government. Thereafter, we shall be able to ask our rulers both at Federal and State's level to account for how they have disbursed our collective national earnings. That I consider intellectually worthwhile and intelligent than the rantings over the Hausa/Fulani's fictitious domination as if to say they are not human beings like Edo, Igbo, Yoruba, Ibibio or Ijaw people.

S. Kadiri.                 


Return, to, the, South-East, MASSOB, tells, Igbo ... Vanguard News. A Nigerian newspaper and Online version of the Vanguard, a daily publication in Nigeria covering ...



 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 11 juni 2017 22:03
Till: usaafricadialogue
Ämne: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra
 
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Kenneth Harrow

unread,
Jun 15, 2017, 8:32:28 AM6/15/17
to usaafricadialogue
A sufi mystic al-hallaj of the 11th century said, I am the lord (in our prayers on shabbat we say, quoting god, ani adonai elochechem.
The war between the sufi and the cleric, the mystic and the uploader of the law, the beautiful spirit and the stern legalist, has existed in islam for a thousand years.
You can chose which side you areon.

The sufi was killed because of his words, which were never properly understood. 

rushie’s blasphemous words were pronounced by a troubled character and they expressed his crisis of faith. When the words came to the point of pointedly insulting not allah or muhammed, but rather ayatollah komeini, it is said, he put the book down and pronounced the fatwa.

The nazis burnt the books they didn’t like and tried to exterminate the people they didn’t like

To condemn someone because of his attacks on one’s beliefs or identity or anything, as if the words carried harm like acts is not to distinguish words and acts. If the words promote acts, like encouraging people to commit a crime, the responsibility for the words falls on the speaker, who incurs punishment, in most countries, though not the u.s.

If the crime, however, is blasphemy then the community that is offended should use words back, not deeds to punish the speaker.

I base this not on first amendment rights, but my sense of basic human decency—not on the sense that I am the lord.

but then I am not a figure in power, not given the chance to prove how awful a ruler I am. Instead, I dream of al-hallaj who submerged himself in the divine like a wave in the ocean, about which he could only say the words that resulted in his death.

In fact, jesus was not any different; if I worked on it, I could easily put moses or muhammed in the same position. 

Gotta go and get ready for tomorrow

ken


Kenneth Harrow

Dept of English and Film Studies

Michigan State University

619 Red Cedar Rd

East Lansing, MI 48824

517-803-8839

har...@msu.edu

http://www.english.msu.edu/people/faculty/kenneth-harrow/

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 15, 2017, 10:09:40 AM6/15/17
to usaafricadialogue
Glossing over of strategic facts:

'The first group to attack was not the fed govt but Biafra. 

The very declaration of Biafra was an act of war against the Constitution and the sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in the same way that the secessionist gambit of Boko Haram was a declaration of war against the sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.'

Boko Haram initiated and sustained violence by killing  rival Islamic clerics and by bombing Federal govt institutions,  killing fed govt representatives,  bombing churches and machine gunning Christians, and after seizing significant territory through these methods, declaring a caliphate over which they flew their flag.

Biafra was declared in protection of Igbos following the anti-Igbo pogrom in the North in which thousands of innocents were massacred and the failure of the fed govt to guarantee the safety of Ndigbo. If I recall correctly, a major revision to the Aburi Accord on account of which Ojukwu and his team as leaders of Biafra rejected the revision was the fed govt insisting on its  right to declare a state of emergency in any region. In the light of the virtually govt sponsored pogrom that had massacred thousands of Igbos earlier such a level of power arrogated to the fed govt would leave the SE open to further machinations at the hands of that govt, meaning the safety of the Igbos who had fled to the SE for safety could not be guaranteed.

The anti-Igbo pogrom is genocidal while  the unilateral modification of the Aburi Accord suggests an insensitivity to the fallout from the genocidal action. What is war but the effort to subdue through force, whether physical, political or both?

There is a world of difference between the non-violent self defensive strategy of Biafra in relation to the fed govt at its founding and the murderous quest to set up an Islamic caliphate by Boko Haram through terror initiated by the terrorist group.

Anyway, as Nigerians  we are all in the same terrible situation .

I hope those who believe the institutions that run the country are working well and can be relied on are following the latest news on Saraki, who has been acquitted,an example of power play whether or not he was guilty,  and on the money found in the Ikoyi apartment, of which no news has been forthcoming from the VP's investigative panel on the subject, an outcome some hold is so bcs Buhari is described as having known of the money.

We need fundamental, transformative change. Those who are for restructuring should fight for it. Those who are for secession should fight for it. They should support each other. We should all support either of these reworkings of Nigeria.


thanks

toyin
















To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 15, 2017, 1:28:44 PM6/15/17
to usaafricadialogue
The Multiplicity of Expression of the Resructionist and Secessionist Visions in Nigerian History

Restructuring and secessionist visions  have been openly advocated or tacitly pursued by different actors, of various ethnicities , in different   contexts in Nigerian history.  A comprehensive grasp of these initiatives across time  indicate that they reinforce each other suggesting they will remain alive in the polity until the issues they represent have been decisively addressed.

    Obafemi Awolowo and Odumegwu Ojukwu

 In discussing the ideological formulation and practical expression of  restructuring  and secession in Nigerian history, the more apt comparisons are between the   SW political leader Obafemi Awolowo  and the Biafran leader Odumegwu Ojukwu, rather than between Awo, Zik and Aguiyi-Ironsi. The politics of Nnamdi Azikiwe  as a SE Igbo were very different from that of Ojukwu, the other famous SE Igbo of the same period. Ojukwu is also very different from Aguiyi-Ironsi, a famous general from the SE and first military head of state, both in his strategies and the contexts in which those strategies were developed

Within this context it is inaccurate to state "the two coups of 15 January 1966 in which Major General Johnson Thompson Aguiyi Ironsi triumphed as the Military Head of State"  bcs the belief that Ironsi was part of the coup or tried to take advantage of the coup is at best controversial.  His being described as 'triumphing' in what is credibly seen as a damage control mission in taking charge of the govt after the political and military leadership had been decimated by the coup is a partisan position.

In terms  of similarity of vision,  Awolowo's famous description of various ethnic groups in Nigeria as developing according to different trajectories and therefore requiring government in terms of their own endogenous organization,  complements Ojukwu's also famous 1969 Ahiara Declaration made in the depths of Biafra's war of secession in justifying the war as a struggle between civilizations, echoing Awo's description  of  "differing standards of civilisation as well as uneven stages in the adoption of western education and the emulation of western civilisation".

The persisting urgency of this vision is underlined not only by the differing strategies of these two men in pursuing a similar vision but by the differences in the pursuit of the vision by their ideological descendants, the vision persisting in spite of these differences.

 Awolowo was imprisoned for treason by the fed govt, if I recall correctly, bcs it was believed he planned to secede. Ojukwu chose to secede bcs he was convinced that was the only hope for Ndigbo in the light of the fed govt enabled pogrom of thousands of Igbos in the North and the later failure of the Aburi Accord meant to secure significant autonomy for the various regions, but which was truncated by the fed govt's unilateral revisions to this agreement.

Awolowo may thus be described as one of the earliest ideological formulators of the federalist vision but that vision may be seen as  first presented as a practical strategy under the impress of the dire circumstances of the Aburi Accords, a vision in which Ojukwu and his negotiating team placed great hopes as the last resort to avoid secession and possible war.

We are faced today with a similar situation, in which Ojukwu's ideological and ethnic descendants are pursuing a vision of restructuring to true federalism or secession, thereby mirroring the contexts of Aburi.

Awolowo, for his part, chose to suspend his federalist vision and join the Nigerian  govt in the war agst Biafra, a war reinforcing the unitary structure of Nigeria presented as 'making Nigeria one'  and   later struggling without success to become President of Nigeria. Awolowo's ideological and ethnic descendants have variously tried to project his vision, either in terms of focusing on ethnically homogenous politics within the unitary structure of government, or after the June 12 debacle,   pushing for reconstruction into true federalism, a vision the leaders of the group seem to have abandoned after reaching the political centre in 2015 for the first time after decades of opposition politics.

Nigerians, however, are pointing to their failure to implement the reconstructionist vision they had outlined in the APC manifesto subscribed to in alliance with their Hausa-Fulani  major partners. The inadequacies of the current stye of govt are increasingly highlighted by crudities of govt strategies and falling  standards amidst the absence of radical strategies for transforming the polity beyond its moribund dependence on oil exportation and concentration of resources  in the hands of a govt bureaucracy that guzzles most of the country's revenue. With the general silence from Awo's SW on this subject, the secessionist vision from the Igbos of the SE has risen in intensity and is gathering momentum among both Igbos and non-Igbos with various ethnic groups  either positioning themselves or have would be spokespeople urging them to position themselves for various levels of self determination  with secession as the climatic point of  this initiative.

Restructuring and Secession as Revolutionary Reworkings of the Nigerian Polity

The struggle for reconstruction and secession are not about appointments to any kind of position in Nigeria as it is currently constituted. They are not about Igbo, Yoruba, SS, Edo, Delta or Hausa-Fulani Presidency. They are not about the various appointments of any ethnic group over the years or at present to any position in Nigeria 

Igbos and SS people are asking themselves what they gained in essence from the govt of the SS man Goodluck Jonathan whom they supported. Some people from the Muslim North are declaring members of the legislative houses will resist restructuring bcs it will work agst their interests  and that with restructuring the current Northern political elite will be swept away. People from the SW are discomfited  by the power play within a govt that was supposed to empower their region but seems to be using them as second class partners while those who believed in the govts promise of change are crying out their grave disappointment, leading some  to believe that what is needed is a restructuring of the polity more than the succession of various  compromised govts.

The question, broadly speaking, is about freedom from the mono-economy represented by  dependence on oil and its resultant  stifling of creativity and concentration of resources and political power at the centre enabling a culture of corruption.

Its about a decisive drive to independent power generation and distribution rather than being locked into the inefficiency of having to first send power generated to a national centre.

Its about abolishing of inequity in cut off marks in exams for admission to educational institutions so all regions are treated equally and any who are lagging behind in educational standards uplift themselves through hard work and strategic planning rather than rely on mediocre standards enabling access to the same opportunities as competed for  others held up to high standards, an imbalance central to sustaining a culture of national mediocrity.

Its about the demystification and diluting of the power  of the Presidency as the centre of a bloated and tyrannical govt.

Its about responsibility of states to man their own security and ensure accountability to their own people.

Its about ending the tyranny of Fulani terrorism, its alliance of Fulani militia and Hausa-Fulani politicians employing the nomadic  herdsmen culture as a terrorist  advance guard while denying the need to build ranches in their own region to sustain the cattle rearing business, feeding their people on the illusion of the sustainability of a colonialist relationship with Nigeria, an illusion impoverishing the very herdsmen themselves who are further distanced from the need to adjust to modern economies even as various peoples mobilize agst them and their terrorist drive emboldens populations agst the Fulani political elite. 

For the SE particularly, its about bringing an end to decades of deliberate structural  underdevelopment, opening ports and international airports  in the region to serve its large and vigorous merchant class.

Its about the building of the 2nd Niger Bridge to enable adequate access for commerce and general traffic  from the SE to beyond the region,  among other strategic initiatives unique to the region.

Creative  vs  Atavistic  Behaviour in the Nigerian Struggle

The restructionist and secessionist visions are far from parochial but are universally valid for all Nigerians. Those who support the Kaduna Declaration eviction notice from the North to Ndigbo as a kind of punishment for the Biafra drive might not realize  they are working agst genuine agents of social transformation representing equity for all Nigerians.

The Kaduna Declaration explicitly invoked IPOB's sit-at-home order in commemoration of the Biafran dead, a peaceful protest very different from any calls by any other pro-Biafra group to Igbos to relocate to the SE, describing as provocation to other Nigerians a peaceful sit-at-home to remember war dead as is done in various pubic holidays in Nigeria and across the world, as with the SW June 12 remembrance public holiday in Nigeria . 

Why this focus by the Kaduna Declaration on IPOB's sit-at-home? The fear of the power  demonstrated by the  peaceful civil disobedience  call and its compliance, a vital strategy in either reworking the nation or balkanising it in the face of readiness in use of armed force by the fed govt in resisting such creative transformations.

 Some of these critics demonise the secession vision as a personal threat while in fact its a call to arms to  all Nigerians to fight for an equitable nation for Nigerians by Nigerians or the creation of new nations where such equity can be more readily pursued.

Let us meet on the other side in a genuinely restructured or balkanised Nigeria.

great thanks

toyin

On 15 June 2017 at 20:30, Salimonu Kadiri <ogunl...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Biafra secessionist venture has nothing to do with restructuring of Nigeria from unitary to pure federalism. Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju, will cure himself of phobia for what he constantly refer to as Hausa/Fulani domination, if he bothers to acquaint himself with history of Nigeria. Who propagated for unitary central government in Nigeria and when was it implemented and by who?


The National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroon (NCNC), as it was known in the 1950s, led by Nnamdi Azikiwe propagated for a unitary constitution for Nigeria which was strongly opposed by the Action Group (AG) led by Obafemi Awolowo. He expatiated, "As between the various ethnic groups, I argued, there were differing standards of civilisation as well as uneven stages in the adoption of western education and the emulation of western civilisation. A unitary constitution with only central government would only result in frustration to the much push-ful and more dynamic ethnic groups, whereas the division of the country into regions along ethnic lines would enable each linguistic group not only to develop its own peculiar culture and institutions but to move forward at its own pace, without being unnecessarily pushed or annoyingly slowed down by the others (Chapter 12, EVOLUTION OF A FEDERALIST in AWO : The Autobiography of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, p. 164-165)." For opting for Federal constitutional  government in Nigeria, Nnamdi Azikiwe and his NCNC branded Awolowo a fascist who wanted to balkanise Nigeria and he called Federalism, Pakistanization.


After the 1959 Federal election, none of the political parties secured a majority to rule at the centre. Awolowo stated plainly that he could serve in a national federal government led by Nnamdi Azikiwe, but not in the one led by a feudalist. NCNC and AG together had 164 seats as against NPC 148 in the House of Representatives. However, Azikiwe entered not only into a coalition government with the NPC, but also conceded the post of the Prime Minister to Abubakar Tafawa Balewa on the belief that since Northerners had no so much educated people, the Igbo would control all the apparatus of governance in the country. Truly, as Chinua Achebe confirmed on p.66 of his book, There Was  a Country, the Igbo led the nation in virtually every sector - politics, education, commerce and the arts, the achievements made possible by the NCNC coalition government with the less educated Northerners. The Deputy leader of Action Group and Premier of Western Region drew attention of Awolowo to the ethnic lop-sidedness in the recruitments and appointments in the federal public service and parastatals against the Yoruba and urged Awolowo to join a national government led by Balewa, so that the Yoruba could get their share of federal appointments. Awolowo replied that officials were to work for the entire nation and not alone for their respective tribes. That was the major cause of conflict between Akintola and Awolowo. When the Yoruba Kings (Oba) summoned both of them to a reconciliation meeting, Akintola spoke in Yoruba to describe the impossibility of Awolowo's ideology of democratic socialism. He said, "TÍ A BÁ DÉ IBI TÍ ERÁNKO PÉJO SÍ, NSÉ LÃ'WÁ OHÚN T'ÓJÒRÙ FÍ HA IDI; TÍ OBÁ SÉ BI ÈNÌYÀN LÃRIN ERÁNKO, WON YIO WULÈ PÁ ONI." Literarily translated, it means, "When you are in the midst of animals, pretend to be like them because if you try to behave like human beings, the animals would kill you for nothing. What Akintola said implied that Awolowo should be as tribal as Azikiwe and his NCNC by joining the national government led by Abubakar Tafawa Balewa. Everywhere in Lagos is SÚKU-SÙKU, Akintola said, if you go to Lagos. SÚKU-SÙKU was Akintola's euphemism for the Igbo shortened  name, Chukwu. The dispute over joining the federal government by the Action Group was exploited by the NCNC/NPC coalition government to overthrow the government of Western Region controlled by the AG. The crisis that followed, led to the two coups of 15 January 1966 in which Major General Johnson Thompson Aguiyi Ironsi triumphed as the Military Head of State.


Traditionally, a military coup is usually followed by the release of political prisoners jailed by the ousted regime, immediately after take over. Ironsi dumped that tradition by not releasing Awolowo and others jailed by the NPC/NCNC regime. Instead, he appointed Francis Nwokedi as one-man commission of inquiry  on a unitary form of government in Nigeria. In his Budget broadcast of 31st March 1966, and before Nwokedi submitted his report on unitary form of government in Nigeria, Aguiyi Ironsi said among other things that, "I am convinced that the bulk of our people want a united Nigeria and that they want in future one government and not a multitude of governments." By the end of April 1966, Francis Nwokedi had submitted his one-man constitutional review in which he recommended the abolition of the Regions. Despite oppositions, Ironsi promulgated Decree No. 34 of May 24, 1966, to establish unitary form of government in Nigeria. On May 28, 1966, riot broke out throughout Northern Nigeria in protest against unitary government. Since the NCNC manifesto had always advocated unitary form of government in Nigeria, many considered Ironsi's decree No. 34 as implementing NCNC political agenda. By coincidence, NCNC was mainly an Igbo party and with Decree No. 34, many Nigerians regarded the military take-over as an Igbo coup. In addition the refusal of Ironsi to release Awolowo from prison was alluded to his well-known opposition to the unitary form of government and releasing him before decree No. 34 was well established beyond reversal was dangerous to the regime. Two months after Decree No. 34 Ironsi was overthrown in a bloody coup but subsequent regimes retained Aguiyi Ironsi's unitary form of government in the Federal Republic of Nigeria.


The overthrow of Ironsi eventually led to civil war that ended thirty months after it started. The current  Igbo led resuscitators of Biafra are claiming that since the end of the civil  war, the Igbo people have been  marginalized, reduced to second class citizens, oppressed and treated as a conquered people in Nigeria. It is extremely ridiculous that a group who claims to be marginalized, oppressed, treated as conquered people and reduced to a second class citizens would have produced the Vice President of Nigeria in the person of Dr. Alex Ekwueme, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Edwin Ume Ezeoke, Presidents of the Senate - Chuba Okadigbo, Evans Enwerem, Adolf Wabara, and Anyim Pius Anyim, and Deputy Senate Presisent Ekweremandu. The Minister of Finance and Economic Planning under Babangida was Dr. Kalu Idika Kalu and many Igbo enjoyed juicy appointments under General Babangida to the effect that Ohaneze Ndigbo conferred the traditional title of Ogugua Ndigbo on him. There was a  Minister of Finance under President Obasanjo named Okonjo Iweala. The Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria then was Charles Chukwuma Soludo just as Kingsley Moghalu had been Deputy Governor of CBN. Chief Chukwuemeka Ezeife was Special Adviser to Obasanjo on Political matters while Andy Ubah was a Special Adviser in the Presidency. Obasanjo's Minister of Aviation was Kema Chikwe and the Minister of Defence after Theophilus Danjuma was the son of Aguiyi Ironsi. Under President Jonathan, the Chief Economic Adviser to the President was Dr. Nwanze Okedigbe. Once again Dr. Ngozi Okonjo Iweala was not only Jonathan's Minister of Finance but Coordinating Minister of Economy. And when Sanusi Lamido was driven out of the Central Bank as the Governor, he was replaced by Godwin Emefiele. In fact, what had to do with the Finance and Economy of Nigeria under Jonathan was controlled by persons of Igbo ethnic group. Director General of Budget Office was Bright Okogwu; Director General of Bureau of Public Procurement, was Emeka Eze; Director General of Bureau of Public Enterprises was Benjamin Ezra Dikki; Director General of Security Exchange Commission was Arunma Oteh; Director General of Nigerian Security Exchange was Oscar Onyeama; MD of AMCON was Chike Obi; MD of Sovereign Wealth Fund was Uche Orji; Director General of Housing Fund was Sunny Iroha; Managing Director of Bank of Industry was Evelyn Oputa; Chairman of  Investments, Securities Tribunals was Nnenna Orji; Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF) was Anyim Pius Anyim; Director General of Pension Commission(PENCOM) was Chinelu Onuoha; and Director General of Debt Management Office (DMO) was Dr. Abraham Nwankwo. Lest we forget, Jonathan's Minister of Aviation was Stella Adaeze Oduah and because of official malfeasance she was replaced with Osita Chidoka. Professor Bath Naji was Minister of Power but when he attempted to sell PHCN to his proxy company, he was removed and replaced with Professor Chinedu  Ositadinma Ndubusi Nebo, while Dr. Sam Amadi was the Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission. Since Abacha time up to May 29, 2015, Wilson Orakwe Emeka Offor had been the sole government contractor awarded Turn Around Maintenance of Nigeria's four oil refineries for billions of dollars so that they would be able to refine 445,000 barrels of crude oil per day to meet domestic consumption. The list of important positions held by persons of Igbo ethnic group can infinitely be long, nevertheless, I stop here to mention that the Chief Of Army Staff under Jonathan for a long period was General Azubuike Onyeabor Ihejirika  before he was replaced with Alex Badeh. Viewing the above narratives it is a heightened self-induced paranoia for any Igbo to claim that the Igbo people have been marginalized in Nigeria since the end of the civil war.


Since Nigeria returned to civil rule in 1999, Southerners in the persons of Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan have ruled Nigeria as President for eight and six years respectively, totalling fourteen years. Rather than restructuring into true federalism, they enjoyed ruling with the unitary constitution that concentrates power at the centre. The impoverishment of the Nigerian masses have been perpetrated by the political elites from all, and indeed major, ethnic groups in Nigeria. It is the Nigerian masses that have been marginalized and oppressed by the alliance of ethno-religious groups governing the country. Instead of holding the ruling elites accountable for the mismanagement of our national incomes and resources, resuscitators of secession are helping to divert attentions from national looters and plunderers. All along, IPOB, MASSOB and BIM have preached openly not only for an Igbo Republic but for a Biafra that will include satellite none Igbo ethnic groups beyond Igbo ethnic natural territory. Interestingly, none of the Igbo political and business billionaires cautioned or warned the Igbo ethnic supremacists demanding for secession. Rather, they attribute the agitation for Biafra to the marginalization of the Igbo in Nigeria. In the online Nigerian Guardian of June 9, 2013, the then President General of Ohaneze Ndigbo, Chief Gary Enwo Igariwey, was quoted as saying, "We have the population and the Igbo are the only people with over a 25 per cent spread in any part of this country. We are not underdogs under any circumstances, we have the capacity to decide who can be president or who cannot be because we have the numbers." It cannot be denied that the Igbo are everywhere in Nigeria, something that would have been impossible if they are hated and persecuted by their host communities in other parts of Nigeria as it is being politically touted. Now, when the Arewa Youth reciprocated to the IPOB and MASSOB's agitation for secession in what can be termed as Mutually Assured Ethnic Destruction, by demanding that all Igbo in the North should leave the North within three months and all Northerners in the Southeast should leave at the same time, hell broke loose. The Arewa Youth ultimatum is very intelligent because it will deescalate ethnic war threat that have been constantly chanted by IPOB and MASSOB for some years now. If all Igbo in Nigeria return to the Southeast, other Nigerians in the Southeast will not consider Igboland safe for them and will automatically leave, resulting in an Igbo Republic. The Arewa Youth ultimatum is not different from the order of MASSOB, in 2015, to all Igbo in other parts of Nigeria to return to Igboland. see http://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/11/return-the-south-east-massob-tells-igbo. On the 25 November 2015, the National Director of Information,  MASSOB, Mr. Uchenna Madu directed Ndigbo residing outside Igboland to start returning to their homeland and he gave reasons for his directive. http://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/11/biafra-agitation-reveals-seast-neglect-marginalization-igbo-leaders. Yet between 1999 and 2015, the Southeast received 17 trillion naira as revenue allocations from the Federal government. Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju, will probably be able to help us with the information of how much income Nigeria has earned between 1999 and 2015 and how much money each state in Nigeria has derived from revenue allocations shared by the Federal Government. Thereafter, we shall be able to ask our rulers both at Federal and State's level to account for how they have disbursed our collective national earnings. That I consider intellectually worthwhile and intelligent than the rantings over the Hausa/Fulani's fictitious domination as if to say they are not human beings like Edo, Igbo, Yoruba, Ibibio or Ijaw people.

S. Kadiri.                 


Return, to, the, South-East, MASSOB, tells, Igbo ... Vanguard News. A Nigerian newspaper and Online version of the Vanguard, a daily publication in Nigeria covering ...



 



Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Jun 15, 2017, 4:01:08 PM6/15/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

If one, for the sake of convenience, should agree with you that Biafra was declared in protection of Igbos following the anti-Igbo pogrom in the North in which thousands of innocents were massacred and the failure of the Fed. govt. to guarantee the safety of Ndigbo, then, one should expect you to demand that Biafra should have contained only Igbo ethnic group. However, following Aguiyi Ironsi seizure of power after the coup in which all casualties, except one, were non-Igbo, and Decree No.34 of May 24, 1966, riot broke out throughout the North on May 28, 1966 and did not subside even after 29 July coup 1966 that overthrew Ironsi and installed Gowon in power. Refusal of Ojukwu to recognise Gowon as the new Supreme Commander helped to undermine Gowon's position to gain control over the soldiers in the North. The riots stopped later, but towards the end of September 1966, a radio broadcast from Cotonou alleged that Hausas leaving in the Eastern region were killed and the broadcast was relayed by the BBC and Radio Kaduna. In revenge Igbos in the North were attacked in thousands. By the end of October 1966, the riots and revenge killings had ceased. If Biafra had been declared exclusively for the Igbo before the end of October 1966, one would have understood Ojukwu, instead, he waited until May 30, 1967, and forcibly annexed non-Igbo into his Biafra.


On Aburi accord, you recalled wrongly. The Aburi accord was completely incorporated into Decree No.8 which was approved by the Supreme Military Council at its meeting in Benin on March 10, 1967, which Ojukwu refused to attend. Off course, the Decree contained additional provision authorising the Supreme Military Council to declare a state of emergency anywhere in the country, if situation called for it, and except it was consented to by, at least, three out of the four military Regional governors. As it was, three of the four Regional governors were in the South and it would have required the approval of two governors in the South collaborating with the only one governor in the North to declare a State of Emergency, for example, in the then Eastern Region. So, Ojukwu's rejection of Decree No.8 was a pretext to declare his predetermined Republic of Biafra.


It was unfortunate that Igbo civilians who never participated in the military slaughter of non-Igbo in January 1966 were attacked and massacred in the North. However, Philip Effiong gave reasons for the reaction of Northerners in his book, Nigeria & Biafra : My Story. Under the subtitle, THE GATHERING STORM, he wrote, "In the course of my duties as Principal Staff Officer at General Ironsi's SHQ, I received a number of intelligence reports about the arrogant and sometimes abusive attitude of the Igbos in the North and the suppressed anger of many Northerners, including our Northern Army officers (p. 76)." Further on page 88, Effiong wrote in the subtitle, THE MAY DISTURBANCES thus, "It must be added that the attitude of the Igbos in the North, as reported in some papers at the time of the first coup, was particularly provocative and contributed to the violent eruption of emotions, giving some encouragement and reason for action." Lastly on page 332, Effiong wrote, "I must also state that the attitudes of the Igbos in the North after the first coup of 15 January 1966 was somewhat provocative and contributed to the hardening of the attitude of the Northern leaders when the massacres began in July 1966." These are the facts that should not be ignored while condemning the Northern rioters of May to October 1966.

S. Kadiri 
 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 15 juni 2017 15:34
Till: usaafricadialogue
Ämne: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra
 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 15, 2017, 8:45:13 PM6/15/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

I insist that nowhere in the world would those who are saddled with protecting the territorial integrity of a country sit idly by if secession is declared.  Witness Cherchnya and the Barthes separatist war in Spain.

In the declaration of Biafra the Feds were left with no option but restore the territorial iintegrity of Nigeria by whatever means.

I do not believe in your submission that those who want secession should fight for it.  I would say those who want separatism should embrace the democratic option.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Kenneth Harrow

unread,
Jun 16, 2017, 4:57:44 AM6/16/17
to usaafricadialogue
Olayinka
If we are talking about more than biafra, then maybe we could speculate on independence or separatist struggles that are more meritorious than others? And who decides that?
But consider just a few cases. How about algeria or the portuguese colonies that were considered part of their colonial rulers’ territories, in contrast with colonies or mandated territories? The united states was part of britain, as were australia and canada; quebec is part of canada; eritrea was part of ethiopia.
The list is endless. There is something fundamental about this process of amalgamation and separation. Consider the various empires like austro-hungary or the ottoman.
Biafra is not alone in the world, which you indicate. The u.s.s.r, yugoslavia, etc., all part of a pattern of disintegration of a dominant state.
I know some believe national boundaries are or should be natural. that’s not really good history.
Look at a map of the u.s. In 1800 and now, and consider how much war put the country together. Look at texas and california, added through war. Should not the mexicans have been supported by the world, and compensated.
How are we supposed to think about this process? Which struggles merit our support?
Are you imagining a debate where that question might be put to biafra?
I am the outsider to this debate, trying to understand its complex history
ken

Kenneth Harrow

Dept of English and Film Studies

Michigan State University

619 Red Cedar Rd

East Lansing, MI 48824

517-803-8839

har...@msu.edu

http://www.english.msu.edu/people/faculty/kenneth-harrow/

Dear Ken,

Let me thank you, thank your patience andtolerance in advance,for putting up with the kind of answer I suspect that I'm going to give : More questions.

I want to at least satisfy my conscience. Con-science

"Everybody who read the Jungle Book knows that Riki tiki tavi's a mongoose who kills snakes.


Well
, when I was a young man I was led to believe there were organisations to kill my snakes for me,i.e. the church, i.e. the government , i.e. the school. But when I got a little olderI learned I had to kill them myself" ( Donovan : Riki Tiki Tavi

At primary school (in Fulham ) I learned a rime which began

"Sticks and stones may break my bones , but words can't hurt me"

Another version is "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never break me"

They tried to instil that kind of attitude in us at school , not least of all to avert the fist fights that were a daily occurrence in the playground - between friends, sometimes directly after playing/ sharing marbles.For the sensitives(many dimensions), be they Joos (another spelling, don't take offence) Christians (another faith) or Muslims (other believers), another truth could be, "Sticks and stones may break my bones and words can also hurt me"

But to the point. The current First Minister is Nicola Sturgeon and the then First Prime Minister and leader of the Scottish National Party who worked indefatigably for that Referendum was Alex Salmond( sounds remarkably close to " Alex Salman)

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Jun 16, 2017, 4:58:05 AM6/16/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Before May 24, 1966, Nigeria was governed by a federal constitution and the four regions were relatively free economically from the government at the centre. It was General Ironsi who implemented the NCNC long time advocated ideology of unitary form of government for Nigeria that abolished the Regions and federalism. About the two coups of 1966, it is naive to assume that Ironsi did not stage his own coup against the Majors. When Major Patrick Chukwuma Nzeogwu at 12:30 noon of January 1966 broadcast his revolutionary military take over in the North, General Ironsi caused Lagos Radio to announce, at 14:30 pm,  that he and the vast majority of the army were loyal to the federal government and described what happened as mutiny that would be brought under control. When Lagos Radio was caused to announce the loyalty of the Army to the federal government, Ironsi knew already that Balewa the Prime Minister had been murdered. What a loyal army should have done after quelling rebellion within its rank was to provide security so that the Parliament could meet to elect a new Prime Minister. That was the process set in motion when the NNA majority in the parliament nominated Zana Bukar Dipcharima as their candidate for the office of Prime Minister and UPGA nominated Kingsley Ozumba Mbadiwe as their candidate. Then, Ironsi told them that he could not guarantee the loyalty of the army unless power was handed over to him. Nwafor Orizu, the acting President told the parliamentarians that he was not going to assent to their election of a new Prime Minister. Dipcharima and Mbadiwe were forced to sign a handover paper to the military in order to make it look legal even though the constitution had no provision for such transfer of power. There were indisputable evidences that Ironsi had foreknowledge of the coup through his infiltrators among the Majors and he planned meticulously to steal their revolution and supplant them.


Awolowo was jailed on trump up charge of planning to overthrow the NPC/NCNC led federal government by Balewa and Azikiwe. His trial was preceded by the overthrow of the Action Group controlled government of Western Region and its replacement with a Quisling's regime. You may wish to know that after the Jos conference of the Action Group in February 1962, the party adopted Democratic Socialism as its ideology. Thus, Samuel Gomsu Ikoku, the AG opposition in the Eastern House of Assembly, replaced Ayo Rosiji as the Secretary General of the AG. Anthony Enahoro, S.G. Ikoku and Patrick Dokotri, of the UMBC that was in alliance with AG, were also tried along with Awolowo. It would not make sense to assert that Awolowo planned to secede from Nigeria with an Igbo Secretary General of AG, an Esan as a second deputy leader of AG and a TIV from UMBC led by Joseph Tarka.


When Yakubu Gowon pardoned and released Awolowo on August 2, 1966, Nigeria was in chaos. In his Statement at Ibadan on May 1, 1967, he made it clear that if the Eastern Region was allowed to secede, West would also secede. Then on May 5, he led a peace delegation to Enugu to convince Ojukwu that their were better political options than secession. Ojukwu branded Awolowo's peace initiative as stillbirth. The war to keep Nigeria as a united country had nothing to do with unitary system of government. Awolowo served under Gowon's Government just as Enahoro and a host of other southerners. Shortly after the end of the war Awolowo resigned from the government. Ojukwu wore the beards of Fidel Castro but acted like the Katangese secessionist of the Congo, Moise Tshombe. His Ahiara declaration of 1969 was a smokescreen designed to divert attention from the impending defeat of Biafra. Did Ahiara declaration restructure Biafra to the effect that the Ibibio, Effik, and Ijaw were allowed to rule themselves?


You claimed that restructuring/secession is not about appointments yet the Igbo who are clamouring for secession say that their demand is premised on marginalization of their ethnic group in federal appointments. I have proved beyond every reasonable doubt that the Igbo have never been marginalized in Nigeria and they, like officials from other parts of the country, have been incompetent, corrupt and roguish. I am convinced that even if Nigeria is restructured into a village a country with the current crops of intellectuals and politicians, nothing but tragedy far greater than that of Southern Sudan will be achieved.

S.Kadiri
 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 15 juni 2017 19:24
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 16, 2017, 7:01:52 PM6/16/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

Professor Harrow,

In the name of love and reverence for life, how do you to put an end to the violence that’s motivated by a sense of religious righteousness?

SÄPO (The Swedish Security Service) has just woken up to the reality; they can now smell the coffee and the gunpowder too as they upgrade the number of radicalised Muslims in Sweden from a mere 200, to "thousands" - although - so they say - only a tiny number of the thousands have the operational ability to make bloody hell in our country. But radical being such a broad term, it probably includes those who would resist oppression of any kind " by any means necessary"

Just for the record:

As you have rightly said, without any room fort miss-understanding, you are not The Lord. Sure, Hallaj was misunderstood. He would have got away with it if his executioners had thought that he was mad. Wasn't Jesus also crucified for saying "ana anal haq"? / "I am the truth"? In Jesus' case he is being reported to have said, "I am the way, the truth and the life ; No one comes to the father except through me." That must have sounded like a challenge to the other Rabbis, Pharisees, making them see red > the blood of Jesus - a Rush-die type fatwa on his head because of what he said.

Of course nowadays, with or without your students or disciples, should you arrive in Jerusalem around the time of the Passover / Easter and make such a claim even at the Mea Shearim, nobody would take you seriously or threaten you with crucifixion. On the other hand if you were to assert that kind of identity in Saudi Arabia any time of the year, that could cause some trouble for you (at which time some leverage from Trump could be your only hope. In such circumstances, I think that preaching Rabbi Jonathan Sacks' Not in God's Name would just make matters worse for you or whoever.

There are two hadiths in this link which illustrate how some of the true Believers (Mumin) believed in those days. The women in question preferred to submit to the punishment ordained by the Sharia in this life - in order to avoid the everlasting fire in the life after death, the olam ha ba

You say that I can chose which side I am on.

My first Sufi teacher Dr. Javad Nurbakhsh said that after the Prophet of Islam sallallahu alaihi wa salaam blessed the Hereafter the Muslim community that he left behind was divided into

(1) The Arab Nationalists who became the Sunnis

(2) Those who chose to follow Ali ibn Abi Talib (a.s/ r.a) i.e. the Shia

(Incidentally, Imam Ali ( a.s.) was martyred on exactly this day the 21st of Ramadan - having been attacked with a poisoned sword in the mosque at Kufa on the 19th of Ramadan 40 A.H

( 3) The Sufi who transmitted (and still transmit) the esoteric teachings

to which group belonged your Mansur al Hallaj and this book by him : Tawasin

I have heard two of Dr. Nurbaksh's close disciples, one by the name of Terry Graham and the other by the name of Leonard Lewisohn refer to (1) and ( 2) as "the legalists "

My second Sufi teacher Hazrat Sultan Husayn Tabandeh Reza Ali Shah was also a trained Mujtahid and his father's compendium Pand-i Salih ( Salih's Advice) outlines the general rules of that order...

There's also the Rifai order . There are also other orders...

The problem for the Mumin is that he may rightly or wrongly understand that he is obeying orders from Allah the One and Only ALMIGHTY.

I had some difficulty coming to terms with the mass execution of Jews in Medina - I asked some alims/ scholars about it and was given the ultimate Quranic injunction as an answer: Quran 5: 33

Both the Bible and the Quran have their say on homosexuality for example - and you may call them fundamentalists if you want , the zealots who would like to wipe out / " purify" Tel Aviv which is currently "the Mecca of the Gay" in the Holy Land of Israel. The fundamentalists of the 21st century are keen to implement the death penalty, according to their own understanding of what they believe to be a Divine punishment.

The alims say that the Almighty's word cannot be abrogated.

As Chief Bolaji usually says,

And there you have it.

Cornelius

We Sweden

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 16, 2017, 7:01:52 PM6/16/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

Corrected.

Professor Harrow,

In the name of love and reverence for life, how do you put an end to the violence that’s motivated by a sense of religious righteousness?

SÄPO (The Swedish Security Service) has just woken up to the reality; they can now smell the coffee and the gunpowder too as they upgrade the number of radicalised Muslims in Sweden from a mere 200, to "thousands" - although - so they say - only a tiny number of the thousands have the operational ability to make bloody hell in our country. But radical being such a broad term, it probably includes those who would resist oppression of any kind " by any means necessary"

Just for the record:

As you have rightly said, without any room fort miss-understanding, you are not The Lord. Sure, Hallaj was misunderstood. He would have got away with it if his executioners had thought that he was mad. Wasn't Jesus also crucified for saying "ana anal haq"? / "I am the truth"? In Jesus' case he is being reported to have said, "I am the way, the truth and the life ; No one comes to the father except through me." That must have sounded like a challenge to the other Rabbis, Pharisees, making them see red > the blood of Jesus - a Rush-die type fatwa on his head because of what he said.

Of course nowadays, with or without your students or disciples, should you arrive in Jerusalem around the time of the Passover / Easter and make such a claim even at the Mea Shearim, nobody would take you seriously or threaten you with crucifixion. On the other hand if you were to assert that kind of identity in Saudi Arabia any time of the year, that could cause some trouble for you (at which time some leverage from Trump could be your only hope. In such circumstances, I think that preaching Rabbi Jonathan Sacks' Not in God's Name would just make matters worse for you or whoever.

There are two hadiths in this link which illustrate how some of the true Believers (Mumin) believed in those days. The women in question preferred to submit to the punishment ordained by the Sharia in this life - in order to avoid the everlasting fire in the life after death, the olam ha ba

You say that I can chose which side I am on.

1987 : My first Sufi teacher Dr. Javad Nurbakhsh said that after the Prophet of Islam sallallahu alaihi wa salaam blessed the Hereafter the Muslim community that he left behind was divided into

(1) The Arab Nationalists who became the Sunnis

(2) Those who chose to follow Ali ibn Abi Talib (a.s/ r.a) i.e. the Shia

(Incidentally, Imam Ali ( a.s.) was martyred on exactly this day the 21st of Ramadan - having been attacked with a poisoned sword in the mosque at Kufa on the 19th of Ramadan 40 A.H

( 3) The Sufi who transmitted (and still transmit) the esoteric teachings

to which group belonged your Mansur al Hallaj and this book by him : Tawasin

I have heard two of Dr. Nurbaksh's close disciples, one by the name of Terry Graham and the other by the name of Leonard Lewisohn refer to (1) and ( 2) as "the legalists "

1989: My second Sufi teacher Hazrat Sultan Husayn Tabandeh Reza Ali Shah was also a trained Mujtahid and his father's compendium Pand-i Salih ( Salih's Advice) outlines the general rules of that order...

1991 the Rifai order and one more order of the Shadhiliyya branch...

The problem for the Mumin is that he may rightly or wrongly understand that he is obeying orders from Allah the One and Only ALMIGHTY.

I had some difficulty coming to terms with the mass execution of Jews in Medina - I asked some alims/ scholars about it and was given the ultimate Quranic injunction as an answer: Quran 5: 33

Both the Bible and the Quran have their say on homosexuality for example - and you may call them fundamentalists if you want , the zealots who would like to wipe out / " purify" Tel Aviv which is currently "the Mecca of the Gay" in the Holy Land of Israel. The fundamentalists of the 21st century are keen to implement the death penalty, according to their own understanding of what they believe to be a Divine punishment.

The alims say that the Almighty's word cannot be abrogated.

As Chief Bolaji usually says,

And there you have it.

Cornelius

We Sweden



On Thursday, 15 June 2017 14:32:28 UTC+2, Kenneth Harrow wrote:

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 17, 2017, 9:04:57 AM6/17/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

While I share quite a few of laudable goals of restructuring I disagree that secession or threat of same is the best way to actualize them


Yes politics is a game of interests and shared interests.  The fact that some people did not share your interests does not mean you issue direct or implied threats to them to comply or else.  That aporoach is one of covert terrorism while the author paradoxically label the other side of collusion iin terrorism only through guilt by ethnic affiliation.

Yes, as I wanted to include in my hurried response to the previous posting but was prevented by inadequate time and work engagement there was a clear move toward the goal for fears expressed in your earlier post during the regime of Ibrahim Babanginda which provided the reason for his interminable elongation of the life of that regime.

In an interview about a week ago the scoundrel justfied his actions by saying he and his fellow AFRC members felt Nigeria was not ripe for democracy at the time. 

 What he did not say is that personality envy betwern himself and Aare Abiola  (SImilar to the personality clash between Gowon and Ojukwu which provided 50% of the readon why the first civil war was inevitable) played the major part in the annulment which he got the spurious democratic military contraption to rubber stamp.

He and the jealous  northern oligarchy ( which is different from the millions of innocent northern victims like their southern counterparts) felt it was the wealth of Aare Abiola that got him the presidential victory rather than the 3 decades goodwill the Aare garnered around the country.  Hence his revelation that they planned another election in  November 1993 in which the Aare  was not expected to be a candidate.  I recall him saying at the time that he knew those who would not succeed him.

YarAdua the elder whom he obviously preferred to carry on as the oligarchys candidate had been knocked out by Arthur Nzeribes stratagem.  There was no ready heavy weight around again. He was perfecting this strategy when he was kicked out of office.  It was perhaps in pursuit of this goal that the Dangote persona (a little known entity  in the Babangida era) was developed financially by Abacha.  Wether Dangote would eventually have allowed himself to be used for that goal could not be categorically affirmed before Abacha was knocked out of action.

I have gone to all these length to ascertain that there was a definite plan by  Ibrahim Babangida and a northern oligarchy for which he was a front not to relinquish power forever and to determine who gets what in Nigeria and to always choose first.    They seem to be primarily interesred in using the military to ensure subordination of the South to the North.  That group plotted the ouster of Muhammadu Buhari in his first governmental incarnation.

June 12 saw through their machinations and ousted them after a prolonged struggle.  That victory belongs to ALL Nigerians including the SE.  That group has started regrouping to infiltrate PMBs administration hence the Presidents spouses clarion call.

This is why I think that now that all Nigerians are set to reap the benefits of that victory with a renewed charge of accountability is not the time for a call for secession but for a rededication to a common vision of probity in  the Nigerian federation.  Remember PMB  has been in charge for only 2 yrs and the difference is already clear.  Democracy is patient game and there is 2 more years to go.  

Rather than the Biafranists kicking themselves out of Nigeria for no real reason  they should wait till the end of the first term take stock and working with allied minds kick this administration out of office if it has not delivered. 

As to the necessity for Igbo presidency stay tuned for my  AT THE CROSSROADS:  PROJECT IGBO PRESIDENCY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE NIGERIAN NATION STATE.





Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Date: 15/06/2017 18:28 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Kenneth Harrow

unread,
Jun 17, 2017, 9:05:04 AM6/17/17
to usaafricadialogue
Hi cornelius
Your first question is a hard one, how to put an end fo the violence. You can say, motivated by a sense of religious righteousness, but I don’t believe that is really what drives this violence. Young men, raised under conditions in which they feel they are oppressed, are driven by the opportunities afforded them through the wars going on in the middle east. Some are motivated by a newfound faith; others by the belief they are treated badly by the mainstream culture. I am thinking more about france, and probably the u.k., and no doubt the netherlands and esp belgium. The other european countries I know less about, and you can tell us more about scandanavia.
They go off to fight in syria, or are convinced to carry the fight on here.
This is no longer the result of a fatwa, but the extension of a war that is actually being waged now, with isis being cornered in iraq and syria, and utilizing all their force of fighting back.
Imagine a 20 yr old, not particularly happy about how the french or dutch or brits regard or treat them, finding a cause they are now willing to fight in.
Another thing is that a large number of those who committed the atrocities in france and britain were also either deranged or ex-criminals. They are the marginal elements, not concerned about killings or death. This all will end, but if it came to more repression of the muslim community as a strategy to end it, I am sure that will backfire.
My thoughts on it
Ken
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 17, 2017, 8:18:02 PM6/17/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

2 a-m.

Dear Ken,

Loquacious and verbose, let him ramble on.

Where have all the young men gone ?

Sadly, what some people don't realise is that as a result of all this fratricidal killing and maiming in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Nigeria, everywhere, simultaneous with whole societies being destroyed, uprooted, millions internally displaced, millions of refugees, millions of broken families, so many widows, the Muslim fighting force of able-bodied young men is gradually but surely being depleted. That what's happening and when they are war-weary and completely finished, somebody produces a peace treaty which dictates the terms of surrender to the defeated and then says, "Sign here!"

About some of the conditions that produce jihadists, what you say is corroborated by many reports and newspaper articles about the making of a jihadist.

It's a surprise for some that the London Bridge attackers were not some hard-nosed Islamists : London Bridge attackers were regulars at Sunday afternoon pool sessions

When his country is attacked and occupied by foreign forces what is the Jihadist supposed to do? There are many passages in the Quran that give him the legal cover if not the motivation to fight whatever injustices he may perceive, such as imperialism and colonialism.

Lovey-dovey Sufism and sufistic aphorisms such as "Love is the bridge between you and everything" do not translate into put down your weapons of resistance and love your enemies...

Here's some other news that will make some people feel or see blue: Russian Ambassador to Israel: We Do Not Consider Hamas And Hizbullah To Be Terrorists At All...

When David Grossman was here a few years ago he told us that at the height of the Second Intifada, in the Jerusalem neighbourhood in which he lived they had to split their children up and send them to school in different buses; still looming large, the spectre of a young man boarding the bus, wearing an outer garment a couple of sizes too big for him, with sleeves down to his fingertips or with a pack strapped to his back at the sight of which everybody dives out of the bus. As the Quran says , "And thou wilt find them (the Jews) greediest of mankind for life and (greedier) than the idolaters. (Each) one of them would like to be allowed to live a thousand years. And to live (a thousand years) would by no means remove him from the doom. Allah is Seer of what they do."

But I think that even Chidi would be scared if Biafran Security were to make a public announcement there in Owerri that thousands of radicalised Muslims /potential Boko Haram radicals had moved to his town or were already there living legally in Igboland and potentially wishing their fellow citizens no good. In a free Biafra (Bia-free-a) things would be a little different...

SÄPO's new figures that in Sweden right now there are thousands of "radicalised" Muslim extremists living in our midst, not behind bars but roaming free in their thousands is scary. It increases the national paranoia, everybody on the alert : Breaking news: thousands of radicalised Muslims/ Muslim extremists in our midst. Where? Everywhere !

Looka here !

And here Apostle Johnson preaching violence and destruction in the name of Jesus...

It's bad enough when Cornelius who has nothing against Islam sees anyone sporting a Talibanic beard and thinking "Ah! One of them !"or "potentially one of them" and you can never be sure! I have a friend from Algeria, who lost an arm fighting with the Mujahideen against the Soviets in Afghanistan (He is now more of a theologian than an Islamic warrior - the second to last time I met him he said that he could assure me that on no occasion did the Almighty ever speak to Aaron.)

Several Muslim men and women have travelled to Syria and Iraq to join forces with various Jihadists there. Some have returned and having acquired some military experience it is feared that they could turn on those perceived to be their local enemies...

You say, "but if it came to more repression of the muslim community as a strategy to end it, I am sure that will backfire." By "backfire," I suppose you mean " explode"? Implode - with lots of fire? Sooner or later repression leads to explosion. In as far as anti-Muslim immigration is the islamophobic wind of change blowing over Europe, each and every terrorists attack in Europe just makes things worse. When I first heard about the Tower in London burning down to the ground, my first thought was arson on a tower where mostly foreigners and a large number of Muslims lived...

After SÄPO's announcement a great many Muslim youngsters could now be under suspicion - if not by the Security Police, then under suspicion by their neighbours - everywhere - in the streets in the department stores, in the tube, boarding the bus right now, at the airport. There was the case of a woman who was seated next to a bearded young man resulting in her refusing to travel on that plane...

I sent this titillating quote to a friend from France :"Mieux vaut être avec une vieille femme qui vous conduira au succès que de sortir avec une jeune fille qui a toujours faim (SOPEKA) et qui vous mènera (conduira) à la ruine "( President Macron) and got this in reply : "I don't  like Macron and don't intend to vote for him on Sunday. The first thing he did was to support an anti-Israeli Arab-supported vote at Unesco ("Israel has no cultural ties to Jerusalem"LOL!!!) If he prefers old women that's his problem! I don't care a fig!"

My own response to that is :" If it's true that he said such a thing, then Macron is no better than a couchon"

Still no relief for my piles... writing this kind of crap about how mortal we all are makes me painfully aware that our days are numbered and that I personally could be "the greediest of mankind for life" with no prophetic dreams yet about the 72 dark eyed virgins waiting for me or Macron to look forward on the other side, am in no hurry for the carnival to be over and to meet my Creator.

Praying that tomorrow is another day.

Cornelius

We Sweden

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 18, 2017, 10:35:34 AM6/18/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

And for the avoidance of any doubt the federal government should now go on the information offensive starting from Abuja the symbol of the nations unity with sign posts in front of the property of citizens of Igbo origins:

WE ARE IGBO ON THE FEDERAL WINNING SIDE.
(The federal registry has data on landowners in Abuja)

Large bill boards must be taken up in strategic places in the FCT for the same purpose.

The Biafranists campaign of half truths and misinformation must be proactively challenged. 
.
Anyone beaming a satellite in Abuja from the US( locus of the gallery of the lobby to which Biafranists pander)  can see the truth about marginalization for themselves. 


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Olayinka Agbetuyi <yagb...@hotmail.com>
Date: 18/06/2017 09:52 (GMT+00:00)
Cc: Olayinka Agbetuyi <yagb...@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra


Ken.

You claim that Biafra is not unique in the world in its move toward secession.  It is to what end that matters.  The problem here is people of that region blow too much hot and cold for too long over the issue.  I want people in the area to make up their mind once and for all and lets get things over with once and for all in a civilized way.  

I am not one of those who will beg anybody not to secede.  If the Yoruba want to secede, by all means let them make up their mind and get on with it in a civilized way and let the rest of Nigeria get on with their lives.  I believe in one Nigeria for those who have an irrevocable vision for that enterprise.  I dont believe that if a part want a few extra things and they dont get it the threat of secession will be the next cheap blackmail while their kinsmen who have been benefitting from the Nigerian system maintain a deafening silence rather than being at the barricades organizing counter movements emphasizing the rewards of Nigerian citizens for those who diligently play their part.

But for the counter movement visibly led by 'the Gord father' (Gordon Brown) the UK could not have survived the last Scottish independence referendum.  Today the union is intact.  Where are the Nigerian Igbo counterparrs today  benefitting from the Nigerian federation making the case for Nigeria vociferously from the roof tops?  I believe this Nigerian government should change administrative reorganisation with an Igbo citizen in the information minister portfolio whose marching orders must be judged by how far they are able to counter and neutralize the secessionist propaganda in the SE.

When America wanted to secede from the UK they made up their mind about it resolutely without blowing hot and cold about it.  The UK sent an expedition to quash the rebellion. It failed.  The UK did not collapse as a result of that.  The UK still exists today even stronger than at that period.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 18, 2017, 10:36:37 AM6/18/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

Ken.

You claim that Biafra is not unique in the world in its move toward secession.  It is to what end that matters.  The problem here is people of that region blow too much hot and cold for too long over the issue.  I want people in the area to make up their mind once and for all and lets get things over with once and for all in a civilized way.  

I am not one of those who will beg anybody not to secede.  If the Yoruba want to secede, by all means let them make up their mind and get on with it in a civilized way and let the rest of Nigeria get on with their lives.  I believe in one Nigeria for those who have an irrevocable vision for that enterprise.  I dont believe that if a part want a few extra things and they dont get it the threat of secession will be the next cheap blackmail while their kinsmen who have been benefitting from the Nigerian system maintain a deafening silence rather than being at the barricades organizing counter movements emphasizing the rewards of Nigerian citizens for those who diligently play their part.

But for the counter movement visibly led by 'the Gord father' (Gordon Brown) the UK could not have survived the last Scottish independence referendum.  Today the union is intact.  Where are the Nigerian Igbo counterparrs today  benefitting from the Nigerian federation making the case for Nigeria vociferously from the roof tops?  I believe this Nigerian government should change administrative reorganisation with an Igbo citizen in the information minister portfolio whose marching orders must be judged by how far they are able to counter and neutralize the secessionist propaganda in the SE.

When America wanted to secede from the UK they made up their mind about it resolutely without blowing hot and cold about it.  The UK sent an expedition to quash the rebellion. It failed.  The UK did not collapse as a result of that.  The UK still exists today even stronger than at that period.


Kenneth Harrow

unread,
Jun 19, 2017, 7:52:20 PM6/19/17
to usaafricadialogue
Hi olayinka
I think there are two issues, at least, going on that I can see as an outsider. One is the continuation of the biafra question, which we thought had been settled in the 70s
There is a very similar situation of discontent dating back to the same period, western cameroon.
The other issue, or aspect of it, they key one I think, is the really great hatred that seems to be characterizing this debate. Even the scots and british do no use such invective over the question of devolution, although not that long ago the british spoke of the irish as inferior beings, and the irish couldn’t mention the english without using expletives and spitting.
The hatred displayed onthis list is truly scary.
I hope people can work it though peacefully

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 1:41:40 AM6/20/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
"The hatred displayed on this list is truly scary" (Professor Kenneth Harrow)

I totally agree with you.

CAO.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 7:55:10 AM6/20/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
 

You are right Ken.  The hatred seems to have ballooned and claimed this listserve as collateral ever since the ouster of Goodluck Jonathan as President (whom some now call a Biafran even though he never referred to himself as such when campaignng for , or ruling Nigeria. Otherwise how would anyone want to vote for a Biafran as Nigerian head of state!)

This is the most vocal evidence that there are those in the South East who think unless one of them is at the peak of executive power the country cannot achieve its destiny because their own destiny is the only correct destiny.

They have their counter parts in the North too and that is why both are always at each others throat.  Religion plays a large part because unlike in the Yoruba states in which both monotheisms are roughly equally divided in the South East vs the North there is overwhelming supremacy of either of the dominant monotheisms.   (As we all know religion is the code for a way of life)  Unlike the Yoruba who keep much of their evangelism within Yoruba states the Igbo prefer mass geographical spread (taking advantage of protection by the Constitution) take their dominant monotheism with them build churches in the North hoping for converts in alliance with minority northerners but encounter vicious resistance from local majority northern communities who prefer their age long religious ways of life.

The ouster of Jonathan with whom they ethnically identify is the main cause of this resurgence.  No matter what the will of the people have come to pass. In so far as Jonathan was not ousted in a military coup Im personally satisfied.  

The country was on fire from a religiously inspired secessionist bid.  Jonathan could not be relied upon to bring the conflict to speedy resolution because he was the general without soldiers.  Field commanders from the north had no faith in him and preferred to loot rather than serve him because to them he symbolized the cultural conquest by the West which they  were in part up in arms against.  Thats why the Nigerian hegemony (in the Gramscian sense) chose Buhari to lead the war.  The Biafranists took this too personally. 

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 7:55:18 AM6/20/17
to usaafricadialogue
Who is hating who and whats the cause of this hate?

For the sake of analysis and possibly helping to cure that hatred.

toyin


CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 7:55:40 AM6/20/17
to usaafricadialogue
The contemporary Biafra struggle represents one of the richest experiences in Nigerian history on account of the rich debate it is inspiring on the nature and possibilities of Nigeria. Facebook is proving to be the best platform for these debates right now on account of the flexibility of the medium. Political discourse has shifted from partisan debates related to one political party or the other to intense and learned ​discussion on the structure, capacities and future of Nigeria, a magnificent  development providing rich education on issues in Nigerian politics, providing depth lacking before now  in this field of experience.

thanks

toyin

On 20 June 2017 at 13:37, Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com> wrote:

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 4:07:58 PM6/20/17
to usaafricadialogue, Olayinka Agbetuyi
Interesting theory, Olayinka:


"The country was on fire from a religiously inspired secessionist bid.  Jonathan could not be relied upon to bring the conflict to speedy resolution because he was the general without soldiers.  Field commanders from the north had no faith in him and preferred to loot rather than serve him because to them he symbolized the cultural conquest by the West which they  were in part up in arms against.  Thats why the Nigerian hegemony (in the Gramscian sense) chose Buhari to lead the war."

Why then, well after Buhari announced the "technical defeat of Boko Haram", the terrorist group was able to launch, a few weeks ago,  an attack on Maiduguri, the capital of Borno state, a city with a large,  established military garrison, and were beaten back only with the aid of the air force reinforcing the ground troops.

Why should Boko Haram be able to even get near Maidiguri, which they have attacked a no of times during the GEJ era, control of which would do much much to boost their caliphate plans,a realization that means the army should have made such an approach impossible?

Has the Boko Haram war made any significant progress beyond the terrorists  being driven to the outskirts of Borno in GEJ's time, and even though Sambisa might have been conquered,  have they not found new territory in which to regroup and launch that last bold attack?

Your theory could shed some light on what is going on, but I wonder if you are not stretching it beyond the saboteurs who leaked information and perhaps weapons to Boko Haram, rather than a tacit mutiny by Northern commanders. If GEJ's Boko Haram war was ineffectual by the time he handed over, Boko Haram would have still been bombing and machine gunning govt establishments, military installations and churches in the North on a practically weekly basis as they had been doing before the 2013 state of emergency, in collaboration with the growing disenchantment of the Northern Muslim poliuace and their alliance with the army represented particularly by the civilian JTF  drove them to the outskirts of Borno, where their most spectacular attacks were in children's schools, horrible as those were,  and what I see as the Borno state governor Kassim Shettima aided Chibok incident.

I realise its convenient for  anti-GEJists to paint the war in that time as largely ineffective and marked by corruption, but in the light of your theory, what do you say to the renewed fightng strength, attack reach and boldness of Boko Haram?

thanks

toyin








Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 8:25:31 PM6/20/17
to Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju, usaafricadialogue, Olayinka Agbetuyi


Im happy that you concede that due to the Buhari initiative which I foreshawed on this forum by advocating a'scorched earth assault' on enemy positions the secessionist force is now on the run now on a full guerrila tactic.

Its only a matter of time before the gallant federal forces wear them out and the resistance will fizzle out and and inglorious band disbanded. 

Yes I was among those who suggested that earlier resistance against the GEJ govt may be due to insider informatiin given to Boko Haramites by those who did not want GEJ to succeed in routing them ( perhaps including those who are supposed to be GEJs field commanders.)  

From what we now see and hear  from Biafranists if GEJ had succeeded there is no knowing if we wont see a filmography depicting GEJ in combat fatigue of Biafra routing federal forces a la Boko Haram and declaring a Republic of Biafra all over Nigerian territory.

Northern commanders may have foreseen this possibility and may have preferred to work with a northern commander in chief to secure this surrender.

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 8:01:56 AM6/21/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
The hatred rather ballooned when some persons here tried to force the Buhari integrity myth on the rest of us. Some ignored,some accepted, some of us disagreed and hell descended.

CAO.

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 2:42:27 PM6/21/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

Chidi,

This thread is getting kind of long, going through so many twists and turns. Now we're here:

Why does the chairman of IPOB have to be so incendiary, talking like this before his trial doesn't help matters much:

Anyone Who Says Biafra Will Not Be Achieved Will Die’ - IPOB Leader, Nnamdi Kanu Spits Fire

You know that what he says in at least some small way impacts on Igbos throughout the Naija federation and beyond. When he is not brought to order after making such outlandish utterances it could be interpreted that the silence of the Igbo elders means their consent, not just their indifference, because this unpeaceful way has its inevitable consequences and who the hell does he think he is to pass the death sentence on law-abiding citizens of Nigeria? Is that not inviting hell to descend on the Igbos once again?


As always there's more than one side to a story; I wonder what you make of this piece from propaganda and destabilisation avenue:


RECOLONIZATION OF NIGERIA:Neo-imperalist agenda - forex and political destabilization.

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 11:04:39 PM6/21/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

Believe it or not , this Night of Power , when I got to this part of a certain prayer

" So great is Your Mercy that You grant the right to live even to the unbelievers who deny You"

for a few seconds my wayward thoughts went to Brer Nnamdi Kanu and his edict that

The line of prayer quoted is from chapter 10 of " The Unveiling of Love " by Sheikh Muzaffer Ozak al-Jerrahi

the chapter entitled " A Prayer" ...

indeed, " Love is the wine" and from that point of view my appeal to Oga Kanu is PLEASE even as we repent of mistakes in the past,

for now and forever, let us be kind to one another

there should be no problem calling the other, Brother....

Kanu of course is speaking of the future, not the past or the present

here too reminiscent of the Exodus 10:28 - words of dramatic irony, from Pharaoh to Moses :

"Pharaoh said to him, "Go away from me! Beware! You shall no longer see my face, for on the day that you see my face, you shall die!"

Fact is that Pharaoh never saw the face of Moses again....

You know what I mean?

"My love she speaks like silence
Without ideals or violence" (Love minus zero/ No limit)

H O

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 12:14:40 AM6/22/17
to cornelius...@gmail.com, USA Africa Dialogue Series
Vintage Prof Cornelius! I thought you were going to do your usual "exegesis" of aspects of Islamic culture particularly when you prefaced your post with night of power. I took a pause from my early morning meal in order to "enter" into your thoughts but alas you allowed the image of uncle kanu to divert your attention. Or was it deliberate. Meanwhile rest assured of my goodwill to and for you and others like your esteemed self whose critical postures make this world interesting. Please join me as we wind down the month of fasting in the Muslim world : in the night of Majesty! 


--

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 6:55:03 AM6/22/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
Mazi Cornelius,
I do not waste my time with characters like Kanu. You at least know me and several other Igbos, now the question is; does it look like Kanu represents us?

The Kanu hate speeches is being used as a blackmail tool. Kanu tongue-lashes everyone, including those you want to call him to order. All the ethnic nationalities in Nigeria however have their own Kanu.

CAO.

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 12:23:43 PM6/22/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

Mazi Chidi,


In plain prose : I agree with you completely.


What's wrong with our man? There he goes, violating the terms of his release, his bail conditions such as

the prohibition against holding rallies, granting interviews or addressing a "crowd" of more than ten people whilst awaiting his trial. As if he is unaware of those bail conditions and maybe intoxicated and getting too big for his boots, a little giddy being so much in the limelight and loving every moment of the media's glare, he has inauspiciously proclaimed himself militant "Messiah of Biafra" - about which I say, well, there are many false prophets and false messiahs - not only of Israel - and in Rabbi Kanu's case it's maybe a prefiguration of his trial, eventual long prison sentence or crucifixion/ execution and martyrdom. All that remains is his last supper with his twelve disciples - after humbly washing their feet. Meanwhile - while he's still a free man let him continue to enjoy prancing around like a pop star, wearing his special colourful robes and Ray Charles sunglasses - delivering lengthy speeches to large crowds - in English too, so that the rest of the world that doesn't speak Igbo can hear and understand him, he has been granting interviews - to al-Jazeera among others and - without any military training or experience is still talking like a great military general like Julius Caesar or soon to be guerilla leader like Che Guevara.

As a result of all of the above, we can see plainly see that his conviction is a foregone conclusion - what we don't yet know is the severity of the sentence that he is going to receive in order to set a statutory example to those who advocate taking up arms against the Federal Government for any reason whatsoever.


What do the Igbo elders say ?


Among the venerable Igbo elders I have in mind stalwarts like stiff upper lip Emeka Anyaoku and in my time in Nigeria, Shagari's second-in-command Alex Ekwueme. On the religious-ethical front, on the world stage we have a moral authority like Cardinal Francis Arinze who we should imagine would much prefer a non-violent revolutionary Brother Nnamdi Kanu walking in the footsteps of his Jewish Brother Jesus and reflecting the values of the Sermon on the Mount, instead of spitting fire and threatening his neighbours with death, as if he doesn't know that Igbos live all over the federation and are liable to tit-for-tat eye for eye retaliation - starting with pogroms in the North as has happened before.


I should like to add Biko Agozino to the honourable category of "Igbo elders" even though he may be too young for that. So what say ye if he is included in the category "Junior Igbo elder " - like a junior senator ? ( When I was eighteen I thought that I was certainly a grown up)


Ten years later , the scars of war were still visible in Aba, Umuahia and Owerri, according to other's testimonies because I myself don't know what those places looked like before the war and I guess that Igbos under the age of fifty can't remember either


We (Igbo, Yoruba, Hausa, Fulani Kalabari alike, including Alhaji Mujahid Asari-Dokubo) have a moral obligation to condemn Kanu's outrageous - and dangerous beating of war drums when we should be talking peaceably about the best way way to go forward and about a referendum to begin with...


All of the above, notwithstanding, it may be a just a blip, but Nnamdi Kanu's place in history is still assured. He has and is still fulfilling his function: amplifying the Biafra cause which in my view, especially in the world outside of Nigeria, I believe many people would support, not least of all here in Sweden , if it is all approached peacefully - starting with a referendum. (I know that an irate Baba Nnamdi Kadiri Esq probably won't hesitate in taking me to task by asking me "How do you know that "many people in Sweden" would support the Biafra cause, ? Did you conduct a referendum whereby you verified their commitment? )


Well, first of all, believe it or not there are the questions that we have to answer in the grave and not before. On the Day of Judgement Nnamdi will probably be asked about his accomplishments on earth that should merit his being granted a seat near the throne of Majesty. At that point, everyone of us will have to speak for him and herself not just on behalf of making America Nigeria/ Biafra etc. "great again". I think that on the day of that trial most of us, including the Nigerian judges will be pleading for mercy -


Na so a see am o!


Yours sin-cerely,


Cornelius


We Sweden

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 12:23:45 PM6/22/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

17.30 -Stockholm, Midsummer’s Day...

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 12:23:52 PM6/22/17
to usaafricadialogue
Chidi has long been anti-Kanu, like some Igbos.

Chidi, could you please share why you are not for Kanu and what you suggest as an alternative in terms of strategy?

Some others argue that Kanu has refined his stance. Now that he has brought his struggle to Nigeria, his methods- both speeches and action, have become wholly non-violent.

He seems to be perhaps the most powerful force in the SE, a reality the Nigerian govt is struggling to deny.

The reality is that when those Ndigbo who oppose Kanu are able to develop and promote a vision of the same depth of appeal as the Biafra vision and do this with the level of self sacrifice as Kanu and his followers are doing,  yet persist in their vision, then the anti-Kanu opposition will begin to command significant attention.

Kanu risked death at the hands of the Buhari regime, which from its record with the massacred Shites and pro-Biafra reporters and its support of the community massacring Fulani terrorists, is not queasy about shedding blood, eventually spending two years in prison without giving up his vision.

 IPOB  followers who have been murdered by the same regime during a peaceful prayer in a church yet persist in the struggle.

For now, the main anti-IPOB group is a revitalized  Ohanaeze, who claim their own demands are centred on marginalization of Ndigbo, particularly in appointments. The govt is happy to announce them as SE  leaders of thought, but I get the impression they are largely a spent force who command little loyalty from most Ndigbo.

Some Igbos are making a strident effort to seize the narrative from Kanu, presenting themselves as intellectuals who should pursue a restructuring rather than a secessionist vision. The question people like me are asking is 'where were you all these years'? The debates they provoke, however, are vital for stoking the fires of aspiration in finding a way out of the current Nigerian semi-failed state situation.

Kanu's IPOB is now offering grants to schools in the SE who will teach history, particularly that of the SE. A magnificent move, taking the struggle into the educational and cultural realm.

It is my prayer that IPOB persist in their demands for a Biafra referendum, pursuing their goal through vigorous education strategies in the SE and nation wide.

I would be so happy if they succeed in their vision of stopping political activity in the SE through their abstention strategy.

Someone has to do something decisive to break the vampiric structure of the Nigerian state. The IPOB drive is creating shockwaves leading in that direction.

More power to them.

toyin








CAO.

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 2:19:10 PM6/22/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
Toyin,
Kanu's method, instead of accelerating the actualization of Biafra rather impedes it. The hate speeches and his "Supreme leader" tendency are drawbacks and unnecessary.

There are other groups pursuing the Biafra cause, but I concede that Kanu's IPOB is the loudest.

Yes, Kanu is a folk hero, but it will take much more than that to actualize Biafra.

It is not true that I am anti-Kanu.l wrote against the violation of his rights when it was very dangerous to do so and published almost every "Free Kanu" release free of all charges.

CAO.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 2:45:02 PM6/22/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
Im glad a fairly impartial party is able to feel the palpable hate dripping inthe postings of some of us who appear to support the position of the pro-secessionist stance ( anyone has the right to support any position it is the language used that reveals love or hate and to what extent.)

It appeared to me in particular from the start of the PMB administration that some are not willing to even give the man any grace to settle down into administration.  

He replaced a party that had been entrenched almost two decades yet people expected him to hit 'hit the ground running' show evidence of progress within the first 100days as if he was ruling an established democracy like America and is bound to follow American way of governmental accounting.

The President was accused of colluding with Fulani herdsmen without any proof just because he happens to be Fulani just as he had been accused of orchestrating Boko Haram to get to power until he was targeted by Boko Haram before he was voted to power and until he made the elimination of Boko Haram his top priority.

Its clear some just hate PMB because of the part of the country he comes from!



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin....@gmail.com>
Date: 20/06/2017 12:55 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

abashafa

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 5:12:07 PM6/22/17
to usaafricadialogue, Chidi Anthony Opara
As a Northerner #I Stand for a peaceful actualization of Biafra as an independent jungle for the Igbos#. To me the time has come and there should be neither pretence nor drawbacks. Let us make it a reality. Professor Soludo, another silent ideologue for Biafra nightmarishly said when Biafra becomes a reality, Igbo's can remain anywhere they are ad citizens of ECOWAS as if the Igbos would force the New Arewa to remain in ECOWAS. Jokers!!! May God make Biafra a reality in the shortest peaceful way.

> CAO.
>
> --
> Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 5:35:40 PM6/22/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Baby Nnamdi Hamelberg,

May the Gods of Sweden, Odén and Tor, and the Goddess of Sweden, Freia, deliver Nigeria from those who preach that divided we, Nigerians, stand and united, we fall. Since Swedish Gods and her Goddess are more powerful than Hebrew and Arabic Gods, I am sure that They will grant the prayer of Nigerians to remain united as brothers and sisters regardless of devilish efforts of Lucifers.

S. Kadiri  
 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 22 juni 2017 17:35
Till: USA Africa Dialogue Series
Ämne: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra
 

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 11:36:23 PM6/22/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

Baba Kadiri,



Isn't Thor the Swedish version of Yoruba's Shango?

It's possible that some of the Italians are still swearing by Mars , but didn't Jesus say "swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King" ?

On the Yoruba (Oduduwa) - Igbo (Biafra ) axis it could be a showdown between Olodumare and Chukwu (assuming that there is a difference between them) If there is a difference and both of them are jealous, what happens then?

You are familiar with Ola Rotimi's "The Gods are not to blame" - so lets skip the argument about which God is responsible for the state that Nigeria is in or which God is stronger; it seems to me that if the Nigerian Gods are united at least on a national, if not a universal level, then the peoples of Nigeria could also be united under the One God and I guess that therein lies the strength in monotheism: you, Chidi and Obi all united under one God and I suppose that the good people of Zamfara would like to make a strong political plea for Allah subhanahu ta'ala as a unifying factor. As you yourself are aware, there's no way Nigerian Muslims (some 55% of the nation) is ever going to accept any other God or Gods (shirk). The Christians of course have issues with "qul huwa allahu ahad" even if you argue the merits of the Omnipotent's divine mathematics. The Jews of course have issues with al- Islam and with Jesus who Islam recognises as the Messiah of the Jews.

The question that we must examine and answer are :

1. Is it OK to legitimise racism and tribalism in the name of this and that religion?

2. Be honest now. What do you say about Biafra wanting a divorce from Nigeria? Surely they should not have to go to war to liberate themselves from an unhappy marriage?

It should be interesting to see how the Pro-Biafra people are going to react to whatever punishment is meted out to Nnamdi Kanu...

Roland Kirk

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 11:36:43 PM6/22/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
Ashafa,
Your Arewa Republic would definitely belong to the civilized global community. This will surely entail the observation of International laws.

CAO.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 23, 2017, 5:38:12 AM6/23/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi


First question: Is it true that ALL or majority of Igbo want a divorce?  How can this fact be authenticated?

If true the divorce is a foregone conclusion for as I have always maintained,  in a democracy no one comes to nationhood bound hands  and feet.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com>
Date: 23/06/2017 04:36 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>

Ibukunolu. A. Babajide

unread,
Jun 23, 2017, 6:38:05 AM6/23/17
to Cornelius Hamelberg, USA Africa Dialogue Series
One error here! African traditional beliefs do not proselytize!  There is freedom to worship whatever pleases you and helps you without fear or favor!

It is the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam that kill on behalf if their God and have a policy of my way or the highway!

Cheers.

IBK

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Cornelius Hamelberg
Sent: ‎23/‎06/‎2017 06:36

Malami Buba

unread,
Jun 23, 2017, 8:16:59 AM6/23/17
to dialogue
Ashafa,
Here’s me thinking that you’ve gone too far with your ’Northerner and ’New Arewa’ Caps; and now Chidi has extended the reach to ‘Arewa Republic’. Notice the EngHausa toponym, and its inference to Zungur’s ’Jumhuriya’ poem. All fascinating - linguistically, that is!

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Jun 23, 2017, 8:37:32 PM6/23/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series



Something to believe in : Brotherhood

This will be my last posting till the 26th of October 2017, unless I have migrated to heaven by then...

Is the venerable Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju one of the "others" when he says that "Some others argue that Kanu has refined his stance. Now that he has brought his struggle to Nigeria, his methods- both speeches and action, have become wholly non-violent."

In that case are we supposed to take the venerable Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju's word as gospel about Biafra's Messiah as being "wholly non-violent"

So, this was the old Kanu ? ( The Somali civil war started in 1991)

Has Nnamdi Kanu become a pacifist or is he still shooting from both sides of his mouth, on the one hand " civil disobedience" and on the other hand declaring as recently as a few days ago, that "Anybody that says Biafra will not come, will die !"

Incendiary non-violent speeches and and non-violent actions eh? Ahimsa ! Who can deny that Nnamdi has not even hurt a fly? So Kanu does does not intend to go for a rumble in the jungle with the security forces?

Biafra: Nigerian league of veteran journalists warn against hate speeches

Insurgency: DSS uncovers plot to attack Kano, Kaduna others

Nnamdi Kanu Latest

On the last Friday of Ramadan Muslim World marks International Quds Day






On Thursday, 22 June 2017 18:23:52 UTC+2, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:
Chidi has long been anti-Kanu, like some Igbos.

Chidi, could you please share why you are not for Kanu and what you suggest as an alternative in terms of strategy?

Some others argue that Kanu has refined his stance. Now that he has brought his struggle to Nigeria, his methods- both speeches and action, have become wholly non-violent.

He seems to be perhaps the most powerful force in the SE, a reality the Nigerian govt is struggling to deny.

The reality is that when those Ndigbo who oppose Kanu are able to develop and promote a vision of the same depth of appeal as the Biafra vision and do this with the level of self sacrifice as Kanu and his followers are doing,  yet persist in their vision, then the anti-Kanu opposition will begin to command significant attention.

Kanu risked death at the hands of the Buhari regime, which from its record with the massacred Shites and pro-Biafra reporters and its support of the community massacring Fulani terrorists, is not queasy about shedding blood, eventually spending two years in prison without giving up his vision.

 IPOB  followers who have been murdered by the same regime during a peaceful prayer in a church yet persist in the struggle.

For now, the main anti-IPOB group is a revitalized  Ohanaeze, who claim their own demands are centred on marginalization of Ndigbo, particularly in appointments. The govt is happy to announce them as SE  leaders of thought, but I get the impression they are largely a spent force who command little loyalty from most Ndigbo.

Some Igbos are making a strident effort to seize the narrative from Kanu, presenting themselves as intellectuals who should pursue a restructuring rather than a secessionist vision. The question people like me are asking is 'where were you all these years'? The debates they provoke, however, are vital for stoking the fires of aspiration in finding a way out of the current Nigerian semi-failed state situation.

Kanu's IPOB is now offering grants to schools in the SE who will teach history, particularly that of the SE. A magnificent move, taking the struggle into the educational and cultural realm.

It is my prayer that IPOB persist in their demands for a Biafra referendum, pursuing their goal through vigorous education strategies in the SE and nation wide.

I would be so happy if they succeed in their vision of stopping political activity in the SE through their abstention strategy.

Someone has to do something decisive to break the vampiric structure of the Nigerian state. The IPOB drive is creating shockwaves leading in that direction.

More power to them.

toyin






On 22 June 2017 at 17:27, Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Mazi Cornelius,
I do not waste my time with characters like Kanu. You at least know me and several other Igbos, now the question is; does it look like Kanu represents us?

The Kanu hate speeches is being used as a blackmail tool. Kanu tongue-lashes everyone, including those you want to call him to order. All the ethnic nationalities in Nigeria however have their own Kanu.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com

Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 23, 2017, 8:37:32 PM6/23/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Cornelius Hamelberg, Olayinka Agbetuyi

You can say that again!


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------

Ibukunolu. A. Babajide

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 8:37:42 AM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com
CAO,

Evil thrives when good men keep quiet and fail to confront it!  Confront your Nnamdi Kanu before he tarnishes the image of all Igbo.

Every ethnic nationality confronts and keeps in check their own Kanus but when the Igbo pat their Kanu on the back it makes others want to release mayhem!

Cheers 


IBK

Sent from my iPhone

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 8:37:57 AM6/24/17
to usaafricadialogue
May Biafra come soon.

May the restructuring or dissolution of Nigeria in the name of true progress come soon.

The current situation is ridiculous. If it continues, we might find ourselves standing on this spot or see the country has regressed even further  in the next 50 years as the system has deteriorated in the 50 plus years since independence.

We need a country our countries to which its citizens and leaders are committed. In its current situation, Nigeria is too much like a jungle, but even then, a jungle operates according to an ecosystemic order through which it maintains growth, but the Nigerian system demonstrates a degenerative order at best.

The difference between Nigeria and serious nations is appalling. Having  observed the difference between Nigeria of more than 10 years ago and Nigeria at present, the degeneration or stagnant condition  is deeply troubling.

Those demanding for fundamental change include those who are cheated in their hopes in APC's promised change and people like me who always saw APC as another group of soldiers of fortune.

I see corruption and elite theft as expressions of non-commitment to a compromised nation. Govt sponsored Fulani terrorism represents the stance of one group to extend a jihadist ideology across a nation they wish to own, an extremist expression of an attitude that sees the nation as a no-man's-land where thieves of all kinds can stake territory.

More power to Biafra, to all secessionists, from the Niger Delta to the Urhobo nation,  and to all  reconstructionists.

My spirit is lifted by this season in Nigerian history.

thanks

toyin

To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 10:32:53 AM6/24/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
IBK,
Exactly what I am doing here and at other places.

CAO.

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 12:01:01 PM6/24/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
Toyin,
What if Nigeria is restructured and working well and I still want a homeland of whatever name for my people and I go about persuading them to join me in the quest, offering no other reasons other than that it's our inalienable right, would the quest be unlawful?

CAO.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 2:03:41 PM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
Again it will not be unlawful if such homeland is NOT to be carved out of an existing nation.



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 24/06/2017 17:01 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 2:03:41 PM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Eze-Cornelius Hamelberg the 1st of Njikoka,


A correspondent name for the Swedish deity, Thor, in Yoruba is not the issue here as every group of people in the world has the right to worship whatever God they wish.


A casket seller sees every living human being as a corpse just like those wishing the disintegration of Nigeria see differences between the Yoruba, Olodumare, and the Igbo, Chukwu. However, the DNA of the Yoruba and the Igbo, and in fact the entire population of Nigeria, is Negroid. That is why the Yoruba Bàbá-aláwo is just another name for  Ezemuo in Igbo. Recently, the Governor of Abia State between 1999 and 2007, Orji Uzor Kalu, attended to a court seating of his trial for looting the state's treasury of the sum of nearly 3 billion naira during his tenure. Mr. Kalu appeared in court dressed up like an Hausaman with a huge Turban on his head. Everyone, seeing him mistook him for Sultan of Sokoto. Not only that, when Justice Binta Nyanko granted Orji Uzor Kalu bail in July 2007, his bail conditions were fulfilled by two Northerners, General Ibrahim Babangida and Atiku Abubakar who signed his bail papers. No matter how much Nnamdi Kanu pretends, he has no Jewish DNA in him and the earlier this Albino stops seeing himself as a Caucasian Jew, the more he will stop having problems.


You asked, "Is it OK to legitimatise racism and tribalism in the name of this and that religion?" That question should be directed to your half brothers, the Caucasian, who since our encounter with them have used religion and racism to oppress and exploit the Black race. Must I remind you that it was Pope Nicholas the Fifth who in his Bull of 1450 quoted Leviticus 25 and Exodus 21 to justify the enslavement of the Black man. You are hereby also reminded that in 1492, Rodrigo Borgis became Pope Alexander VI. In his 1493 Papal Bull leading to the Treaty of Tordesillas between Spain and Portugal, black people were declared the property of those countries. In 1857, a US Pastor and a Doctor of Divinity, George D. Armstrong wrote a book titled Christian Doctrine of Slavery for a pro-slavery argument. Twenty-five years earlier, 1832, a US Professor of History, Metaphysics and Political Law at William & Mary College, Virginia, in his pro-slavery argument wrote a book titled, Slavery Ordained by God. The economic and political problems which Nigerians, and in fact, the entire Africa, are still battling with today could be traced to our enslavers now known as Global leaders. In view of the aforesaid, your question as to if it is OK to legitimatise racism in the name of this and that religion is grossly misdirected.  


Concerning your request on what I have to say on your belief that Biafra wants a divorce from Nigeria, I must confess that I have never been aware of any marriage between Nigeria and an entity called Biafra. The Igbo were born in Nigeria like all other ethnic groups in Nigeria and by birth we are all Nigerians by birth and not by interethnic marriage.


The Igbo have ancestral land area in Nigeria and if they for any reason want to confine themselves inside their ancestral geographical area in the present day Nigeria, I do not think anyone can stop them. That is the essence of Arewa Youths' call on all Igbo to leave the North within the same time that all the Hausa/Fulani in Igbo land (Southeast) should return to the North. Simplified, if Sierra Leoneans in Sweden, for certain reasons, are no longer pleased with  living in Sweden, the best solution for all Sierra Leoneans is to pack their bags and bagages and resettle in Sierra Leone. It can't be wise or logical to demand a referendum in Sweden for Sierra Leoneans to decide whether to exit Sweden or not. So far, I do not know why the Igbo want a sovereign state of Biafra out of Nigeria, and I do not know the geographical land area that is contained in their Biafra.   

S. Kadiri  
 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Olayinka Agbetuyi <yagb...@hotmail.com>
Skickat: den 23 juni 2017 18:00
Till: usaafric...@googlegroups.com; Cornelius Hamelberg
Kopia: Olayinka Agbetuyi

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 2:03:43 PM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi


Usually people embark on the quest for homelands because they are not satisfied with the current arrangements in their current situation and things dont seem to be working well.

Any attempt to solicit support for a separate homeland where current situation works well will rationally fall on deaf ears since no one rationally wants to leave certainties for uncertainties.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 24/06/2017 17:01 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 2:17:00 PM6/24/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
Olayinka,
Homelands are carved out of existing nations.

CAO.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 3:24:53 PM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
Notionally.  If the nationals all agree to legally carve it out. Give examples..

For my own example if a section of the Yoruba decide to legally carve out Oduduwa Republic out of Nigeria, and if the numerically powerful Igbo population as stake holders in all the territory known  as Nigeria decide to withold consent then that homeland will legally remain a figment of the imagination of the proposers irrespective of the fact that the area under proposal was/is their ancestral homeland.  It cannot be turned into a separate republic INSIDE Nigeria except with the consent of majority of the stakeholders of Nigeria.

If the said group want to move outside the current territory of Nigeria to a virgin land drafting along fellow Yoruba to form such republic, of course no one can stop them.

Therein lies the paradox of modern nationhood. Once formed, continuation /separation is a process of continual negotiations. No arbitrary decisions can be made regarding any part of it by any section in it.



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 24/06/2017 19:17 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 3:24:55 PM6/24/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
"Usually people embark on the quest for homelands because they are not satisfied with the current arrangements in their current situation and things dont seem to be working well.

Any attempt to solicit support for a separate homeland where current situation works well will rationally fall on deaf ears since no one rationally wants to leave certainties for uncertainties" (Olayinka).

Agreed, but would such action be considered unlawful?

CAO.

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 4:12:18 PM6/24/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
Olayinka,
again I agree with you, but will add that Biafra can still be achieved through that method, the Nnamdi Kanu and Ralph Uwazuruike hysteria notwithstanding.

CAO.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 4:12:19 PM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

I have answered this question already. If  canvassing for such homeland is with a view to establishing within an existing nation, yes it is unlawful and a treasonable felony.  It can be viewed as an attempt to overthrow the constitutional arrangement of the existing nation.  

Whether the government wants to exercise the prerogative of mercy is entirely up to government.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 24/06/2017 20:24 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 4:50:13 PM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
Well we shall all wait and see...



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 24/06/2017 21:13 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 4:50:13 PM6/24/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
It cannot be unlawful, peoples have inalienable rights to agitate for homelands, so long as such agitations are non violent.

CAO.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 5:09:19 PM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

You are right about inalienable rights to protest. You are right about inalienable rights for homelands where they do not exist or where people are denied access to such homelands.  This does not fit the Biafranists scenario. 

 If under the federal Constitution such homeland is the common patrimony of ALL Nigerians it is illegal to agitate to make such the exclusive preserve of only one ethnic group in the federation.

It is in that consideration that government forbade Arewa youths from giving the Igbo the ultimatum to leave the North.  The North equally belongs to the Igbo, Edo and Yoruba as much as ethnic northerners.  But one can understand the context of the Arewa youth action in view of the agitation for Biafra.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 24/06/2017 21:50 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 5:25:44 PM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com
Nigeria is not a homeland to any group of indigenous peoples. It is an entity unilaterally set up by the British colonial administration for administrative convenience.

CAO.

On Saturday, June 24, 2017, Olayinka Agbetuyi <yagb...@hotmail.com> wrote:

You are right about inalienable rights to protest. You are right about inalienable rights for homelands where they do not exist or where people are denied access to such homelands.  This does not fit the Biafranists scenario. 

 If under the federal Constitution such homeland is the common patrimony of ALL Nigerians it is illegal to agitate to make such the exclusive preserve of only one ethnic group in the federation.

It is in that consideration that government forbade Arewa youths from giving the Igbo the ultimatum to leave the North.  The North equally belongs to the Igbo, Edo and Yoruba as much as ethnic northerners.  But one can understand the context of the Arewa youth action in view of the agitation for Biafra.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 24/06/2017 21:50 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

It cannot be unlawful, peoples have inalienable rights to agitate for homelands, so long as such agitations are non violent.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/usaafricadialogue/ZHkOGPMPwLY/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 6:27:40 PM6/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi

That entity is a compendium of homelands whose integrity even the British did not abrogate let alone the succeeding Nigerian governments: The Edo, Ebira, Hausa, Yoruba, Kanuri, Ibibio, Igbo and Tangale still reside predominantly in their homelands.
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 10:21:31 PM6/24/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
Then, the Igbos are saying that they are tired of the "compendium", the common identity. They want a separate identity as it was in the beginning.

CAO.

abashafa

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 2:35:20 AM6/25/17
to usaafricadialogue
I'll share with you all discussions & presentations of the upcoming conference on the matter by the Arewa Research & Development Project (ARDP) in July. Abin ne da ban takaici. They called for equity & fairness but remember in 1967 there were 12 States and the Igbos had one. If it is equity & fairness to other Nigerians, now that 12 x 3=36, the Igbo's supposed to have 3 States & not even the 5 they are complaining.

On 23 Jun 2017 13:20, 'Malami Buba' via USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Ashafa,
> Here’s me thinking that you’ve gone too far with your ’Northerner and ’New Arewa’ Caps; and now Chidi has extended the reach to ‘Arewa Republic’. Notice the EngHausa toponym, and its inference to Zungur’s  ’Jumhuriya’  poem. All fascinating - linguistically, that is!
>
> > On 22 Jun 2017, at 20:18, abashafa <abas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As a Northerner #I Stand for a peaceful actualization of Biafra as an independent jungle for the Igbos#. To me the time has come and there should be neither pretence nor drawbacks. Let us make it a reality. Professor Soludo, another silent ideologue for Biafra nightmarishly said when Biafra becomes a reality, Igbo's can remain anywhere they are ad citizens of ECOWAS as if the Igbos would force the New Arewa to remain in ECOWAS. Jokers!!! May God make Biafra a reality in the shortest peaceful way.
> >
> > On 22 Jun 2017 18:38, Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Toyin,
> >> Kanu's method, instead of accelerating the actualization of Biafra rather impedes it. The hate speeches and his "Supreme leader" tendency are drawbacks and unnecessary.
> >>
> >> There are other groups pursuing the Biafra cause, but I concede that Kanu's IPOB is the loudest.
> >>
> >> Yes, Kanu is a folk hero, but it will take much more than that to actualize Biafra.
> >>
> >> It is not true that I am anti-Kanu.l wrote against the violation of his rights when it was very dangerous to do so and published almost every "Free Kanu" release free of all charges.
> >>

> >> CAO.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 6:14:28 AM6/25/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
They have representatives in the National Assembly.  That is where constitutionally the initiative should be channelled.



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Date: 25/06/2017 03:21 (GMT+00:00)
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Achuzia and Realuzation of Biafra

Ibukunolu. A. Babajide

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 11:03:56 AM6/25/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
CAO,

The last time the word Homelabds was in vogue it was in respect of the flawed Bantustan homelands of the ignoble Apartheid regime!

It was a horrid coinage and I wonder why you embrace it now like it is the solution to all Igbo problems!  Some immature Black South Africans also embraced it like you are doing now!

Nelson Mandela and many known and unknown patriots including children sacrificed long jail terms and their lives for the great country that is today the Republic of South Africa!

Cheers.


IBK

Sent from my iPhone

Ibukunolu. A. Babajide

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 11:04:05 AM6/25/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
CAO,

Can aboriginal Indians of USA carve out a sovereign country out of USA?

Ponder over that!

Cheers!

IBK

Sent from my iPhone

On 25 Jun 2017, at 10:25 AM, Olayinka Agbetuyi <yagb...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ibukunolu. A. Babajide

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 11:04:50 AM6/25/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
CAO,

Do some research!  Go and read about the Clifford's constitution, Richard's Constitution and the Macpherson Constitution!  The issues you are rehashing now were discussed long ago and settled!

The federal system was adopted so the Igbo can remain Igbo and develop in Igboland as Igbo but at the same time not threaten the plural Nigerian state at the centre!  A lot of blood was needlessly wasted because what was settled was never satisfactory to the Igbo who always wants its cake and have it.

Cheers!

IBK

Sent from my iPhone

On 25 Jun 2017, at 10:25 AM, Olayinka Agbetuyi <yagb...@hotmail.com> wrote:

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages