On 02/23/2016 05:46 PM, Carl Sandrock wrote:
> ...
> This matches your method. So this has saved me some tedious algebra,
> but not the effort of finding the order in which to evaluate the
> equations. I wish that sympy could do this automatically.
I agree.
Maybe this could be added to
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/gsoc-2016-ideas#solvers
Casually, there is a parallel thread on this list on that topic.
On 02/23/2016 03:26 PM, Kshitij Saraogi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am Kshitij Saraogi and I will be a GSoC applicant this year under SymPy.
>
> I wanted to discuss about the Solvers project.[1] <
>
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/gsoc-2016-ideas#solvers>
>
> After going through the discussions mentioned on the Ideas page, I would
> like to get inputs on a few ideas for this project:
>
> ...
> 3. Implementing more equation solvers: [3]
> <
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/10006>
>
> * System of multivariate linear equations.
>
> * Nonlinear multivariate equation solver.
>
> * Equations solvable by LamberW function (Transcendental equation solver)
>
> * Nested trignometric expressions.
> ...
@ Kshitij: Do you think our problem/feature request is already covered by issue 10006?
Carsten