lokeshdeva
unread,Feb 7, 2019, 9:34:27 AM2/7/19Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to SATV
challenge faced and also overcome by the NGT has been in the mission of the Judges and the
Expert Members of the NGT to maintain the precarious balance between the environment and
sustainable development. From observing the recent proceedings of this court and reading the
various orders/judgments passed by the NGT, the Members of this Tribunal have achieved
such a feat in a majority of their cases. For example, in the Lavasa, POSCO, Kaziranga, Jindal
Steel, Somepeta case, and so on.
Also, as a specialized body to determine cases relating to the environment, the NGT should not
have to be limited in such a manner. It is technically equipped to handle cases even under the
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. However, along with an increase in its power to handle cases
involving multi-disciplinary issues, the predicament of the lack of human resource needs to be
resolved in order for the Tribunal to reach its envisioned potential, the basis on which the
National Green Tribunal Act was passed.
The initiation of the NGT under the National Green Tribunal Act of 2010 has been an optimistic
step in environmental litigation. This court can rightly be called ‘special’ because India is the
third country following Australia and New Zealand to have such a system. We feel that India
has the most progressive and active environmental Tribunal. The need of the hour, however, is
building capacity and increasing awareness amongst people, enabling them to come forward to
protect the environment around them. Locals should be able to enforce their constitutional right
to a healthy environment and protect their forests and wildlife.
We look forward to seeing many great things from this Tribunal in the future.