--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Clayto Scott
SF, CA
I can't speak to the Cheviot, but I have the Chev's forerunner, the Betty Foy and it's a lovely bike. It's also my only bike, and it will remain so because it is One Bike to Rule Them All. I am putting Bosco Bullmoose bars on it, and then I promise it cannot be improved upon. That sloping top tube is just so darn practical, and it adds a sexy quality to the bike - it looks like it's ready to take flight, if you ask me. It's smooth and stable and does every single thing I need it to do. It takes me on a very challenging school commute with my sons, and with racks and baskets and a saddlesack, it hauls all the necessary items, including the family dog, who rides in the Wald basket. I was initially set to get a Sam, because it seemed like bike folks didn't consider the mixte a serious bike, but when I called RBW, Keven listened to what I wanted in a bike and said, "Why not a Betty Foy? That's what I ride." And so I met the perfect bike.
If these are the last run of Cheviots (really? It kills me to hear it!) I'd snag one.
I have a Sam. I love it, but like phillip I was not satisfied with upright bars on it. It felt too squished. I know others here have and love uprights on their sams. Mine has drops and is definitely more road like.
Jeremy wrote:
I know from experience that my wife and I can easily pedal the Clem L-type hard enough to cause problematic frame flex. The Cheviot should be stiffer, and I think that would help a lot.
I am duly impressed! The Clem brochure mentions that, under a full load, the 59 Ls will experience a bit of wag when stomping out of saddle. As another data point to your observations, I have a 52 Clementine, and don't have any significant flex to report, problematic or otherwise. While my Clementine's design and accoutrements encourages exploring the gentle side of its nature and generally keeps my inner sprinter at bay, I can kick it pretty good, and I've honked it up some gradual grades, and also motored the flats on occasion, with no discernible flex. (On the Bob list, flex is good!)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/3n9Lw_6W4Sk/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
If you regularly use 2 or 3 bottles it eliminates the Cheviot to me. Yes, you carry water in a bag, but then you're taking up finite bag space with something that ought to be stored on the frame. People buy bags to carry other things, not water. One bottle mount was expected in the 70's but it's 2016. Adding bottle mounts after the fact is for hackers. I've never heard anyone say "Hey I just bought a $1300 frame and it only has one bottle mount, how minimalistic cool is that !". Ahahahahahaha. I'm sure Riv has a reason for just one but regardless it will never make sense to make a bike these days with only 1 mount, especially since it's advertised as being tour capable. It ought to at least have a second under the DT.
That's a good ol' rant for don't skimp on the basic necessities.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
My guess is that a Clem Smith Jr. would serve my intended purpose just as well as a Cheviot. However, after riding both (a much more extended ride on the Clem) I had a much bigger smile after riding the Chev - it simply seemed to have a bit more life to it than the Clem.
Howard
Waiting in Livonia Mi.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/3n9Lw_6W4Sk/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Hey Sean,I've owned both the Chev & Sam, before switching to the Hunq which fit more of my fat tire needs, and the ability to shoulder my bike up and down my apartment stairs.If you don't have to carry the bike up and down any stairs and don't need room for more than 45mm tires, I think the Chev is an excellent choice for what you want. The Sam with albatross bars didn't quite work well even when I had it with a 110mm stem, my hands kept getting pushed to the curves, but the Albatross bars work so well with the Chev. I personally had a better time riding the Chev than the Sam.If the Chev had cantis/v brakes, I would definitely have kept it. I still love my Hunq though.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
The last call revelation plus the new colors have me thinking about the Chev again, but the clearance is tire size limit is still the thing that gives me pause. I know the Clem L solves that, but I'm not attracted to it for some reason.
Is there any realistic way I'd be able to move the 2.3 Super Motos from my Clem to a Chev so i can trade up?
If you are running fenders, adding a centerpull (I use diacompe) in the front greatly increases breathing room.
I have run 47mm with fenders on my 60cm and that was tight. 42s are preferred.
Clayton Scot
SF, CA
I think green bags would look better on the orange bike. But if I ever get a Cheviot, I'll be looking for the green no-cream-headtube bike and put tan bags on it. That would be gorgeous!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.