--
Posting to this group should follow these guidelines https://www.nsnam.org/wiki/Ns-3-users-guidelines-for-posting
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "ns-3-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ns-3-users/cP4KzCH3xjc/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to ns-3-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ns-3-...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ns-3-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Thanks for answering my question. Could you please elaborate a little bit more about NS-3's ideal synchronization? If you don't want the ideal synchronization, could you just change when you schedule the reception of the data at the eNodeB?
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tommaso Pecorella <tomm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,yes, it is correct. No synchronization is necessary thanks to the "ideal" synchronization of ns-3.T.
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 10:00:38 PM UTC+1, Natasha Stopa wrote:Hi,I'm new to both mobile networking concepts and NS3, so I apologize if this is really obvious. In a real system, the timing advance is sent in the RAR, but I didn't see this in NS3. My understanding is that in NS3 a UE will be "synchronized" with the eNB so can directly transmit data to the eNB without adjusting for the timing of reception of the data at the eNB, is this correct?Thanks,Natasha
--
Posting to this group should follow these guidelines https://www.nsnam.org/wiki/Ns-3-users-guidelines-for-posting
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "ns-3-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ns-3-users/cP4KzCH3xjc/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to ns-3-users+...@googlegroups.com.