Dwight - thanks.
Imho, this is a DEEP flaw in MLO's entire system.
The Computed Score needs to be fully understandable and to produce fully controllable results or it is utterly useless (which tragically seems to be the case here). I read the help instructions and am none the wiser. And to be frank if someone with the guru status of you Dwight does not find the Computed Score intelligible then what hope is there for 99.5% of MLO users?
The fact is that Importance and Urgency are utterly different concepts. It's like conflating two different database fields like, say Surname with Age - it simply makes no sense!
For a start Urgency is likely to change rapidly and is more likely to apply to tasks (in my experience)... whereas Importance is less likely to change and is more likely to apply to Projects.
I think it's absolutely crucial to one's overall
effectiveness to NOT to conflate the two concepts, otherwise you will stay very busy... but loose sight of what actually matters. i.e. You are very likely to become deeply ineffective.
[ If you still need convincing then checkout the book I am reading: Greg McKeown's
Essentialism (as recommended by Michael Hyatt – (productivity guru – he of 250K twitt followers) who said "it is the best book I've read in the last 5 years"
http://michaelhyatt.com/essentialism.html ) ]
Back to MLO.
Is there genuinely no way to combine fields arithmetically in order to do sorting? e.g. Might one for example use MLO's effort field + importance in some cunning way.
J