I'm going to reply to Dean's post. Sorry for the length-I don't intend to start some flame war, but some of what is stated as fact there is way incorrect and I have no way of knowing how seriously it will be taken by anyone on (or just lurking on) this thread.
>The space curently has a working mig welder and I personally dont see the point in having a secondary welder ... the metal work room has a limit to the space in it.
OK. To avoid misunderstandings: I have heard and understood this. It is a valid opinion. However, as Dean is the only person who has expressed either of these points to me either personally or on the list, it is the valid opinion of one man.
Hopefully, Dean, you will understand that I will wait for others to chip in before taking this as consensus (and in case people are holding back out of some kind of politeness, nerves or group conformity, please don't - I have no idea where I stand when it is only Dean who will volunteer his opinion to me).
(Liam spoke to me about untrained people using the machines, including mine, but I understand that to be a different issue, primarily about the welfare of my machine and the new one and of the gas.)
>has never worked well or properly.
It did work perfectly well when I brought it to the space. It was set up for disposable bottles. It was then modified to work with proper gas bottles and continued to work. I used it, Luis used it, it worked.
After using it for a ten-minute stint, James found the wire feed slowing down. Arguably, it's only a little welder - don't use it for a full ten minutes without letting it cool down.
It has since developed a gas supply problem, the possible causes of which I am in the process of testing so that they can be fixed. By me.
>I have spent sevral hour explain this as have a few other member of the metal work group
No. Only Dean talked on the subject of the suitability of the space for repair of any kind. No-one else. And though it was more like 20 mins, I wasn't too chuffed about the length of that simple conversation either, Dean.
>the owner does not know what to do and just wants some one to repair it for him in the metal work area,
>the metal work room ... is not a free repair service for personal eqipment.
This is just untrue.
It is correct that I have been asking a lot of advice from people, firstly about welding generally and specifically on this machine, about the pipe connections, about the current state of the welder (as the others that used it knew this and not me), and about potential solutions. I have also asked to be assessed in order to get access to the new welder.
What I have never asked for and did not seek, is anyone fixing my machine for me - I would prefer to have the hands-on experience of doing it myself.
I have tried (within the boundaries of space etiquette as far as I understand it and with regard to the need to actually get stuff done instead of treading on eggshells) not to be an annoyance to those I am seeking help from. Obviously in Dean's case I failed there, but you'll just have to take my word for it, Dean, I did try.
Everything that I have asked of people has been in the spirit of sharing knowledge, rather than getting someone to do my stuff for me. While it has been a one way process (and thanks to everyone who has helped, you included, Dean) I think it's quite important to be clear on the difference between those two things and not to have people say that one equals the other.
The only logical conclusion that I can see of preventing people from asking others to share their knowledge is that the voices in the space with more knowledge (in truth- those with more power or more confidence to impose their will), will coalesce into an experts' group which will be difficult for any outsiders to penetrate.
As I undertstand it, that would be against the ethics of the Hackspace (though I can't be sure, since there does seem to be a deafening silence in LHS around the issue of inclusiveness)
>What I propose is that the owner has three weeks to repair it as has been the guidline with all other abandoned kit >in the space and the he should then take it home or it should be disposed of.
That is a concrete proposal. I would vote against it ATM, but only because I believe it unnecessary for the reasons in my earlier post. Far more important to me is how others are feeling around it (which is something I don't know, having only Dean's evidence to go by).
It would be helpful, now that there is a concrete proposal, if people who have not up til now reached their personal threshold to comment, could express their opinion nonetheless (you can PM me if you're shy). If everyone sits on their hands, then the lack of consensus and the aggravation that goes with it are likely to drag on.
Thanks.
T