Congrats Curtis - this looks great.
I do have one question: you compare in
http://www.hugsql.org/#faq-dsls HugSQL with HoneySQL, however, the one killer feature that I use HoneySQL for is composable queries - or rather building up the Clojure data map through composition before rendering it as SQL. Is there an equivalent capability in HugSQL?
As a trivial example, I need to be able to add joins to the query in response to the filters the user passes through. Equally, I will apply a “top X” if the user has specified that in their request and so on.
Please don’t read this as ‘Honey SQL can do this, you can’t na na nana na’ :-) It isn’t, simply asking for clarity as that comment in the page bought the two into comparison.
Thanks, and again, congratulations!