Thank you,
Kind Regards,
Simon
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I'm still looking for a solution and getting more and more frustrated by what seems to be a very steep up hill battle.
There are quite a few sites linking to http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/toolchains/
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/USEklgWaQkg/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I'll give Debian a go. Just find it hard to start over again, feels like so many steps backward in order to do what should have been possible from the start.
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/USEklgWaQkg/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Thank you, I'll look into it and give it a go.
Are they're any shortfalls to be aware of, anything that isn't supported?
Anyone? Please?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
I've been writing software for various embedded platforms for a long time, MSP430, Echelon, PIC's. In the case of MSP430, the development suite was based on Eclipse. When writing software for PC104 platforms using QNX, the IDE was Momentics, which is eclipse.
The assumption always seems to be that you are talking to someone who hasn't coded much before, I'm 44. I've been coding professionally since 1985.
I can follow instructions as well as the next person, unfortunatley a lot of the information online is incomplete or the guides are lacking.
On Friday, 30 May 2014 20:21:41 UTC+1, l...@ansync.com wrote:Frankly, when developing for embedded platforms, yes, IDEs are too much to ask for. 90% of embedded programming today is done with command-line tools as it has been for decades. Once in a while someone builds an IDE, but they are invariably so limited in application as to be more or a straightjacket than a real tool. The amount of work it takes to produce a truly useful IDE makes sense only if you're developing on a commercial platform with millions of credit-card holding users. So if you want to develop for Windows, Android, and such, good IDEs are available. If you're programming a custom board, well, better get used to building your own tools.
On Friday, May 30, 2014 11:52:53 AM UTC-7, Simon Platten wrote:true, is it to much to ask to use an IDE?
I have it all working for Java, would just like to do the same for C.
On Friday, 30 May 2014 19:37:58 UTC+1, RobertCNelson wrote:On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Simon Platten <simona...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know C and C++ very well...I've been developing in it since the 80's.
>
> What I find difficult is the lack of complete information, is it to much to
> expect that having bought the hardware for the software and documentation to
> be complete?
>
> Sorry, I'm so fed up with dead ends...and pissy people with atitudes, that
> instead of offering help, make wise cracks.
>
> Eclipse isn't the problem, the set-up of the toolchain is.
>
> Sorry, I guess you can tell, I'm a bit tired and just want to make some
> progress on the project, instead of battling with the set-up.
You can always ssh in and build on the target. That's just the way
i've always done it.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
--
In eclipse, I have created a C Project and in the Properties under C/C++ Build, Settings, I have the Cross Settings, Prefix set to:arm-linux-gnueabihf-
Path set to:
/home/simon/gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.8-2014.03_linux/bin
Cross GCC Compiler, Command set to gcc
Cross GCC Linker, Command set to gcc
Cross GCC Assemlber, Command set to as
When I build the project I get:
/bin/sh: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: command not found HelloWorldBBB C/C++ Problem
I have Eclipse Kepler running on Ubuntu 14.04 x64, I can build and remote debug Java applications on the Beaglebone Black, but for some reason I cannot remote debug C applications.
I can compile a C application and I can see that it is transferred to the Beaglebone Black, I can even run it from an SSH terminal on the Beaglebone Black. But trying to remote debug always fails with a GDB error.
The console reports that GDB will reconnect, however it never does.
Can this be of any help?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpg61xG9Egc
It’s an interesting video by Derek Mollow titled
Beaglebone: Java Setup (JRE), Eclipse and Remote System Explorer (RSE)
Having thought about what is happening over night...I still don't understand why Remote debugging from host is 192.168.1.100 ???
I run Ubuntu 14.04 in Virtualbox on my Windows 7 x64 development system. The I/P addresses for the various components are as follows:
Ubuntu, 10.1.174.100 <--- how about a 192.168.1.x subnet?
Windows 7, 192.168.1.100
Beaglebone Black, 192.168.1.161
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/USEklgWaQkg/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.