--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/8G61AQECz08/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
--
On Oct 31, 2015 2:41 PM, "mi...@gehlvail.net" <gehl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Arsi, that was my backup plan, but that's a *little* bit less efficient than a direct write to the SD card on the BBB.
>
> I found Robert's 2 year old eMMC-to-SD script on GitHub; wonder if that's still up-to-date. Guess I'll try!
It is, but it's a little risky on old rootfs, specially prior to Sep 2014.. As we made major changes to the location of the boot loader and kernel location on disk, that summer. (Since that major change we haven't broken it.)
I'd recommend, NFS/rsync backup the boot/root.. Install the 2015-07-28 image, double check the new kernel works for you. (3.8.13 based in that image). Then rsync back just the 'root'.. Double check it still works with your changes.. Then you can use the built in emmc to SD backup across.
Regards,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/8G61AQECz08/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
On Oct 31, 2015 6:52 PM, "mi...@gehlvail.net" <gehl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've found if there are block devices involved, nothing beats dd in terms of speed, if you're within the domain that contains both devices (i.e. BBB has both the eMMC and SD card. Once a network is involved, and in my case, a wireless one, it's network bandwidth that determines the speed.
bmaptools is faster then dd. ;)
>
> rsync is great when we're doing incremental updates, but not so much when you just need a block copy.
>
> cpio I haven't touched since the 80's ;-)
>
> any idea of the location of the images?
http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack_Debian#2015-07-28
Regards,
rsync is great when we're doing incremental updates, but not so much when you just need a block copy.
Regards,
--
bmaptools is faster then dd. ;)