Is the Holocaust a Hoax?

[B.H. Cramer]

Is the Holocaust a Hoax?

Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced
that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.

Fred A. Leuchter is America's leading specialist on the design and
fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers. In
1988, Leuchter scraped samples from the alleged gas chamber walls in
Auschwitz, Birkenau and Lublin. Cyanide residue would be clearly evident on
all these walls if gassings did occur. To his astonishment, Leuchter found
no significant cyanide traces in any one of these rooms.

In 1991, the Polish government repeated these tests to disprove Leuchter's
findings, but they as well found no evidence of any gassings ever occurring.

The structural integrity of these "gas chambers" is also extremely faulty.
These rooms have ordinary doors and windows which are not hermetically
sealed! There are large gaps between the floors and doors. If the Germans
had attempted to gas anyone in these rooms, they would have died themselves,
as the gas would have leaked and contaminated the entire area. Also, no
equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings.
Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers.
There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors
or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.

Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body
has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have
been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died
of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were
murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields
should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one
body has ever been discovered.

The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to
arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or
even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever
presented were drawn up AFTER the war.

Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas
chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million
Jews!

Even The Diary of Anne Frank is a hoax. Portions of the diary were written
with a ball point pen. These pens were not in use at the time Anne Frank
lived.

It is not denied concentration camps existed. Tragically, many died of
typhus or starvation, as often happens in such situations. There is,
however, no evidence that any gassings occurred for the reasons of genocide.

Israel continues to receive trillions of dollars worldwide as retribution
for Holocaust gassings. Our country has donated more money to Israel than to
any other country in the history of the world -- over $35 billion per year,
everything included. If not for our extravagantly generous gifts to Israel,
every family in America could afford a brand new Mercedes Benz. Surely the
American people would be outraged if they realized their hard-earned money
is being squandered in these difficult times.

With all this money at stake for Israel, it is easy to comprehend why this
Holocaust hoax is so secretly guarded. The Jewish name for Holocaust is
"Shoah." In Zionist circles, it is known as "Shoah Business." If nothing
else, this unbelievable coverup demonstrates the irrepressible Zionist
influence and control of our country. Their only defense against the facts
is to cry out "antisemitic," "Skinhead" or "Nazi," whereas the majority of
those who question the Holocaust are ordinary citizens...though you would
never know it from the media.

In whatever way you can, please help shatter this profitable myth. It is
time we stop sacrificing America's welfare for the sake of Israel and spend
our hard-earned dollars on Americans.
(For more information contact The Institute for Historical Review P.O. Box
2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659 USA).

Jewish Orchestra performing at Theresienstadt 'Konzentrationslager' Camp.
Photo taken by Kurt Gerron, Jewish wartime film producer.

There are compelling reasons to believe that the so-called holocaust never
existed. Page 223, in The Diary of Anne Frank, (Pan Horizons edition, Pan
Books Ltd., London, 1989), indicates that the size of Auschwitz, the most
notorious of all German work camps, WAS VERY SMALL, with only 11,000 people
(many of whom may not even have been Jews) being evacuated by the Germans at
the time of the Russian advance in 1945. Certainly, compared to Spielberg's
film, Schindler's List (which Emilie Schindler, Oskar's widow, said was full
of lies), and other Jewish propaganda, that millions upon millions of Jews
were systematically exterminated, 11,000 people is a very small number.
Simple arithmetic tells us that the Germans would have had to have had
hundreds of camps, or else they would have had to exterminate 137 people PER
HOUR, in order for six million Jews to have been exterminated at such small
camps as Auschwitz, a feat that would have been humanly impossible
considering that, according to Douglas Reed's Behind the Scene and The
Controversy of Zion, a mere 850,000 soldiers and others were killed by the
entire German and Japanese war machines combined during WW2 (see p.397-400
of Douglas Reed's book Controversy of Zion).

People who would believe the Jewish propaganda that six million Jews were
exterminated by Hitler must KEEP IN MIND THE SMALL SCALE CONSTRUCTION OF
AUSCHWITZ AND THE VERY FEW OTHER GERMAN WORK CAMPS THAT EXISTED DURING WW2.

On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS - KENW-TV) said that when
Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was
told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years. Again, simple arithmetic tells us that
25,000 times a half dozen camps does not equal 6,000,000. In fact, it
doesn't even equal 600,000. . . .

It is an interesting fact that the number of so-called persecuted Jews KEEPS
INCREASING. Hal Greenwald, program director for the Hillel Foundation at
Duke University, a Jewish student group, has been promoting the idea that
NINE MILLION JEWS WERE EXTERMINATED IN HITLER'S GAS CHAMBERS (New York
Times, Nov. 9, 1991, AP). NOW IT'S 9 MILLION AND GROWING. ..JUST LIKE OUR
DEBT/TAX MONEY SUPPLY...THE NUMBERS JUST KEEP COMING OUT OF THIN AIR. .
.(The Bible Caused Economic and Financial Slavery in the New World Order by
Lee Cheney).

The Holocaust Issue: Three Christian Views

Christian Responsibility to Truth by Herman Otten
While most Revisionists appear to be opposed to the construction of the [US
government] Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC, right next to some of our
nations's most cherished monuments, I say: Let it be built! One day it will
serve as a monument to the stupidity of modern man, who can still accept a
hoax as a fact. Hopefully it will then serve as a reminder to study all the
facts and evidence, and repudiate all hoaxes.

The day is surely coming when all the evidence showing that the Germans
never exterminated six million Jews can no longer be suppressed. Truth is
not determined by majority vote. I learned this lesson in high school, and
since then have repeatedly discovered how the majority of scholars, even
within our churches, can be in error. That our presidents, senators and
congressmen are all supposed to be convinced that the Germans killed six
million Jews, that almost all of our nation's professors and churchmen are
said to maintain that the Holocaust is a fact, doesn't make it a fact.

There is no dispute over the fact that large numbers of Jews were deported
to concentration camps and ghettos, or that many Jews died or were killed
during World War II. Revisionist scholars have presented evidence, which
"exterminationists" have not been able to refute, showing that there was no
German program to exterminate Europe's Jews, and that the estimate of six
million Jewish wartime dead is an irresponsible exaggeration.

The Holocaust -- the alleged extermination of some six million Jews (most of
them by gassing) -- is a hoax and should be recognized as such by Christians
and all informed, honest and truthful men everywhere.

Here are the reasons that have impressed me as particularly persuasive in
coming to my own conclusion that the Revisionist view of the Holocaust story
is the correct one:
- There is no convincing or substantial evidence for the allegation of mass
killings in gas chambers in the wartime German camps. Careful
investigation -- in particular that carried out by American engineer Fred
Leuchter -- has thoroughly discredited the "gas chamber" extermination
claims.

- The most reliable statistics available cannot be reconciled with the
legendary "six million" figure. The best evidence indicates that no more
than a million, or perhaps a million and a half, European Jews perished from
all causes during the war years.

- Neither the major Jewish organizations in the United States, nor the
wartime Allied governments, nor the International Red Cross, nor the Vatican
acted as if they seriously believed the wartime extermination propaganda.

- Although the German government kept extensive and detailed records of its
wartime Jewish policy, not a single document has ever been found which
substantiates or even refers to an extermination program or policy. Instead,
the voluminous German records confiscated by the Allies at the end of the
war clearly show that the German "final solution" program was one of
emigration and deportation, not extermination.

- Even prominent Jewish "exterminationist" historians now acknowledge that
the stories of gassings and extermination in camps in Germany proper are not
true, in spite of the fact that such claims were once seriously made,
particularly at the great Nuremberg Trial of 1945-1946.

- The Holocaust story now centers on just six former camps in Poland. The
so-called "evidence" presented to prove mass exterminations in these camps
is qualitatively no better than the now discredited "evidence" once cited
for extermination in the camps in Germany proper.

- Much of the so-called "evidence" presented by "exterminationists" over the
years has already been thoroughly discredited. For example, the well-known
horrific photographs of piles of corpses taken in camps in western Germany
at the end of the war are now acknowledged to be photos of victims of
disease and malnutrition who perished as indirect victims of the war in the
final weeks and months of the conflict. Also, so-called "confessions" --
such as those of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoss -- have been shown to be
untruthful and extracted by torture. Many of the official reports and
testimonies presented as "evidence" by the prosecution in the Nuremberg
trials have since been shown to be lies.

- The fact that so many Jews "survived" German rule during the war -- many
of them even in so-called "extermination" centers such as
Auschwitz-Birkenau -- is enough to show that there was no German program or
policy to exterminate the Jews of Europe.

View of the swimming pool at Auschwitz 'Konzentrationslager' Camp

The Holocaust is a hoax. The time has come for Christian scholars and
pastors to recognize this, and to stop perpetrating a hoax as the truth. A
Christian is not free to believe and promote a lie about any person or
nation. True Christian scholars should at least read what the Revisionists
write.

Many have said to us: "What difference does it make? The truth of the
Holocaust is of no concern to Christians." Nonsense! A Christian is not free
to believe and promote a lie about any person or nation. A Christian is
guided by truth and facts, not emotions and majority opinion.

If Christians can accept as historical fact the Holocaust, despite all the
powerful evidence that it is a hoax, what does that say about their ability
to evaluate evidence? What about their scholarship? Is it any wonder that
some Revisionists, who have made a careful study of the Holocaust, question
the scholarship of Christians, so many of whom swallow as absolute truth
what is clearly a hoax?

I have been told numerous times, even by theologians who claim to be
orthodox: "I don't care whether it was six million or one Jew, even one is
too many." Such an attitude shows contempt for the truth. A Christian is to
show true love, and the Apostle Paul tells us that love is "happy with the
truth." (1 Cor. 13:6) The writing of Proverbs tells us: "Speak out for those
who can't speak, for the rights of those who are doomed. Talk up, render
fair decisions, and defend the rights of the poor and needy people."
(Proverbs 31:9)

A Christian bases his faith upon facts and absolute truth, not feelings and
emotion. A Christian recognizes that only God is all-knowing. A Christian is
willing to listen to evidence and evaluate various viewpoints. He doesn't
close his mind to the facts and evidence. He doesn't start out with the
assumption that the Jew is right and the German is wrong, or that the Jew is
wrong and the German is right. He looks at the evidence. Those who say they
don't care if it was six million or one are showing a despicable attitude
toward truth. They are saying: "We don't care about the truth." Such an
attitude is sinful and worldly. Is it any wonder that so many then go on to
act as it they don't care about another man's wife or property? The
truthfulness of the Holocaust is a moral issue. Those who maintain that the
Germans exterminated some six million Jews, most of them by gassing, are
seeing to it that the Christian Church can no longer avoid speaking out.
Churches are being pushed, as never before, to have special services
commemorating the Holocaust.

A Christian is ready to change his opinion if the evidence shows he is
wrong. Numerous times we have invited "exterminationists" to refute the
Revisionists.

Some tell us that we have not shown love to the Jews, and that we are being
racists and anti-Semitic when we publish articles by Revisionists
questioning the Holocaust, and when we insist that Jesus Christ is the only
way to heaven.

We have repeatedly emphasized in many editorials that the Bible teaches that
there is no special chosen race. All those -- regardless of color, race,
nationality, sex, wealth, et cetera -- who trust in the merits of Jesus
Christ alone for their salvation are God's chosen people and will go to
heaven. Those who tell Jews, Muslims, and any other non-Christian that they
worship the true God, and can get to heaven without Christ, are not showing
true love to the Jews and other non-Christians.

The so-called "fact" of the Holocaust is being used to deport innocent men
from this country who, as teenagers, served with the German armed forces. In
some cases they have been sent back to certain death in Communist lands. The
[US government's] Office of Special Investigation is using the Holocaust as
an excuse to force from the United States even such a reputable person as
the scientist Arthur Rudolph.

Israel is using the "fact" of the Holocaust as an excuse to execute John
Demjanjuk, an innocent Ukrainian-American. "The Jewish people have a long
score to settle with the Ukrainian people" says Dov Ben-Meir, a deputy
speaker of Israel's Knesset [parliament]. According to this top Israeli
official, "unaccounted numbers" of Ukrainians "collaborated with the Nazi
regime, especially in the annihilation of hundreds of thousands of Jews."

The "fact" of the Holocaust is being used by some to deny that Christianity
is the only true religion, or that Jesus Christ rose from the dead.

Israel is using the "fact" of the Holocaust as an excuse to kill
Palestinians in Israel. This slaughter, together with the anti-scriptural
notions of the Israel-first Millennialists, almost all of whom believe in
the Holocaust, could lead to another bloody war.

The Holocaust is not some innocent hoax, such as children's fairy tales that
entertain and have no evil consequences.
The "chosen people" and "Holocaust" myths make mission work among
non-Christians far more difficult. Arabs, who are told that the Bible
teaches that their land belongs to the Jews, find it more difficult to
believe what the Bible says about Christ.
(Herman Otten is a Lutheran pastor and editor-publisher of the weekly
Christian News of New Haven, Missouri. This commentary is excerpted from his
address at the Ninth IHR Conference. The complete text is published in the
Fall 1989 Journal).

Celebrating Hannakkak at Westerbork 'Konzentrationslager' Camp, in Holland

"Victims Deserve Better" by Joseph Sobran
I haven't been to the new United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, but even
a Washington Post reporter was shocked by what he describes its "outrageous"
anti-Christian propaganda. The exhibition apparently dates anti-Semitism
from the birth of Christ. And of course the implication of the Museum is
that mass murder is worse when its victims are Jews.
Some surprisingly critical notes have been struck in the reviews of the
Museum. Kay Larson, art critic for New York magazine, objects that "the
Germans depicted here . . . are almost exclusively Nazis. . . Most American
children who endure the walk-through will think of Germans as Nazi pigs."

She continues:
The Jews endured the most dementedly calculated and well-documented -- but
hardly the only -- case. To separate the Nazi evil from other evils is
understandable but Eurocentric. It trivializes all suffering but its own. .
. It awards special, extra-human stature to the victims. Nothing that occurs
inside Israel can be wrong, because Jews were gassed at Auschwitz. And so
people set themselves apart from, against, and above others.

She has caught the note of most Holocaust rhetoric: intense self-absorption.
This is a human reaction, and it can be excused up to a point. That point
comes when those whose rights have been violated begin disregarding others'
rights, as when Jewish apologists for Israel feel persecuted by criticism of
Israel's brutality toward non-Jews.

Even many pro-Israel Jews feel uneasy about the Museum being in America, on
government land, paid for with tax money. The implication of its presence is
that all Gentiles, especially Christians, need to be instructed, to have
their consciousness raised, even to be made to feel guilty about Jewish
suffering. As if we didn't know that murder and persecution are wrong! As if
Israel were a moral model for *us*!

In the same way, the implication of the word "anti-Semitism" is that the
chief moral test for anyone is whether he has the correct attitude toward
Jews. And again, this is understandable -- but also very narrow. Murdering
Ukrainians is every bit as evil as murdering Jews, after all. But why should
we even have to say that?

The wrong lesson is being drawn. You would think that the evil of Hitler was
mere anti-Semitism as such, rather than mass murder. But if anti-Semitism
were confined to country-club snobbery, even Jews wouldn't mind it too much.
The real evil is the use of the state as an instrument of death. Government,
perverted from it modest uses, can magnify every crime unimaginably.

That is the real "lesson of the Holocaust," the lesson our time still
refuses to learn. We think it's only the Hitler or Stalin version of the
superstate that is wrong. But think how America's conduct in World War II
would have appeared to our ancestors. It's hard for us to feel the sheer
monstrosity of bombing cities.

I recently heard some interesting testimony on this point. During that war
the US government commissioned a series of propaganda films from Frank
Capra, which were made under the collective title "Why We Fight." One of
them, "The Battle for China," describes the barbarity of the "Japs," also
called "Nips," and mocked them for their "grinning yellow faces." Among the
horrors perpetrated by the Japs was the unprecedented atrocity of bombing
cities, killing civilians by the thousands!

Of course Capra and his staff didn't know that the US government was
planning to do exactly that to Japanese and German cities. In their
innocence, they assumed that only a savage, alien race could have stooped to
such barbarism.

But we have supped full with horrors. Evil bores us. Its statistical
extremes have long since lost their interest, and there is something
ritually formulaic in the demands that we profess belief in, and abhorrence
toward, Nazi and Communist abominations. "Holocaust denial" has become the
big thought crime, denounced by Christians who are quite tolerant of those
who deny the Redemption. No similar opprobrium, by the way, attaches to
Gulag denial. After all, nobody who really believes a thing wants to force
others to profess belief in it. Sincerity never demands hypocrisy.

Even the word "Holocaust" has come to seem a polemical appropriation of
human suffering that verges on the indecent. I remember an old Jewish woman
I slightly knew who had a number tattooed on her wrist. That told me all I
needed to know about Hitler, and it would be pedantic to wonder whether a
regime that was willing to brand Jews like cattle meant to kill them all.
But it would have seemed morally crass to call what that woman had been
through as a girl "the Holocaust": It's beginning to sound like a brand
name, of special utility to glib hawkers. All the victims of World War II,
including Jews, deserve more respect than that.

(Joseph Sobran is a nationally-syndicated columnist, lecturer and
Critic-at-Large for National Review. This commentary is taken from his
"Washington Watch" column in the May 13, 1993, issue of The Wanderer, a
conservative Roman Catholic weekly).

"Examine All the Evidence" by Louis Vezelis
On April 22, 1993, an ugly, monstrous edifice was dedicated in Washington,
DC. It is a grotesque museum dedicated to the victims of evil. The only
problem is that the majority of people throughout the world have been
conditioned like Pavlovian dogs to react irrationally to predetermined
stimuli. Those who refuse are summarily isolated from the rest of the
dehumanized human herd through use of meaningless but emotionally-charged
epithets.

It is quite easy to observe which newspapers are subservient to this modern
day hoax. The subject is the so-called "Holocaust Museum" built on public
land "generously" donated by the US government...

Insulting terminology in an editorial appearing in the left-wing,
pro-Zionist, anti-Christian Democrat and Chronicle [newspaper of Rochester,
New York] introduces the reader to the most obvious abuse of logic and good
taste. But, logic and good taste have systematically been expunged from the
American mind during a period of more than thirty years.

Well-informed American citizens demonstrated [in Washington, DC, on April
22] against the historically false accusations constantly made against the
German people and other nationalities whose only real crime was resisting
the international gangsters who facetiously call their brand of exploitation
"Communism."

The Democrat and Chronicle editorial starts out:
The mindless folks who were waving signs at the opening of the Holocaust
Memorial Museum in Washington, DC, last week claiming that the Holocaust
never happened merely demonstrate why the museum is so important: to
preserve the facts, before they disappear in the mists of history.

These "mindless folks" include none other than well-educated professors and
professional historians, investigative reporters and, in general, are among
the most descent people of a civilized society. It is their *right and duty*
to examine all the evidence, and draw the truthful conclusions concerning
what really happened in history.

There is already a strong indication that those who promote the Holocaust
story are afraid of the truth. That can only explain the need for ridiculing
those who seek only to present the entire matter before an open world forum
of unbiased and unprejudiced investigators. Because the preponderance of
objective and factual evidence shows the promoters of the Holocaust story to
be libelous frauds, sneak tactics and irrational emotionalism must be used.

We are concerned for the truth. Only those who are not of the truth must
resort to lies and bloodshed. Facts by themselves do not constitute truth.
Truth is in the judgment . . .
The Hollywood cosmetics exploiting the unfortunate victims of death do not
prove anything. For example, to film or photograph dead bodies, and then
label them according to one's political need is a travesty of justice and
truth beyond the capability of morally responsible individuals. Facts must
be correctly interpreted before they can tell something of truth.
Another example is the famous "Anne Frank Diary" which has been foisted upon
the American people at all levels. We all wept at the Hollywood tear-jerker
action on the silver screen. Decent people reacted as expected by the
unscrupulous falsifiers of fact. It has come to the attention of more and
more people that this diary is a fraud. Yes, it has been proven to be fake.
Public school facilities are periodically used to foist this fraud upon
unsuspecting citizenry to re-enforce the psychological brainwashing.

Anne Frank was not fake: She really did live. But everything else about her
life is a melodramatic, money-making operation to overwhelm the world with
hatred for a nation. . . No one says anything comparable about the children
brutally murdered by the Soviets when they occupied the Baltic States in
1940, and Germany in 1945.

A French Professor whose love for truth is greater than his love for fame
and life, Robert Faurisson, has proven that the alleged "diary" of Anne
Frank could not have been written by her . . .

While the American people are being lulled into very dangerous apathy by
being fed psycho-babble, a real holocaust, including child murder, is taking
place every day in occupied Palestine. . .

Could it be that someone is trying to put a guilt complex on the American
people so they will not dare raise a loud voice of protest against greater
evils?
(Louis Vezelis, O.F.M., is editor of The Seraph, a traditionalist Roman
Catholic monthly published by the Franciscan Friars (Order of St. Francis of
Assisi) of Rochester, New York. This commentary is from an editorial by
Bishop Vezelis in the May 1993 issue of The Seraph).
Articles reprinted by permission from The Journal of Historical Review, Vol.
13, Number 5 (Sept./Oct. 1993): P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA.

Children in Belsen 'Konzentrationslager' Camp, 1945 from BBC documentary "In
the Camps"

You Have a Right to Know the Truth!

David Irving: Intrepid Battler for Historical Truth by Mark Weber
Soviet premier Nikita Kruschev might have had David Irving in mind when he
once warned that historians are dangerous because they have the power to
upset everything. German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck once said that the
main thing is not to write history, but to make it. Irving is a man who has
been able to do some of both.

He is also living proof that the life of a historian need not be dull. The
leftist British daily The Guardian once commented, "If one can overlook his
outrageously odious views, Irving -- like Hitler -- can be a funny man. The
humor comes from a hint of self-mockery and an obvious delight in making
liberal flesh creep."

At the Eleventh IHR Conference in October 1992 -- as he had in his
presentations at the IHR Conferences of 1983, 1989 and 1990 -- this good
friend of the Institute for Historical Review not only shed new light on
important chapters of twentieth-century history, he delighted attendees with
humorous updates on some of the new ways he had found to make liberal flesh
creep.

In the three decades since he published his first book, Irving has firmly
established himself as not only one of the most successful and widely-read
historians of our time, but also as one of the most courageous.

He has an enviable track record of uncovering startling new facts about even
supposedly well-known episodes of history. His effectiveness is due in very
large measure to his discovery of original source materials, such as
diaries, original documents, and so forth, from both official and private
sources. He is tenacious in his ceaseless digging in just about every
important historical archive in the western world.

A professional historian, Irving has little respect for taxpayer-financed
scholars who are guilty of what he calls "inter-historian incest," and who
thereby help to keep alive dangerous myths and legends left over from
wartime propaganda.

His first work, The Destruction of Dresden, was published in 1963 when he
was 25 years old. Since then, he has published more than two dozen books,
many of them best-sellers, including biographies of Hermann Goring, Winston
Churchill, and Erwin Rommel. He is currently at work on a biography of
Joseph Goebbels.

Several of Irving's books have appeared in various languages, and several
have been serialized in prominent periodicals, including the Sunday Express,
the Sunday Telegraph and Der Spiegel.

Over the years, he has also contributed articles to some 60 British and
foreign periodicals, including the Daily Telegraph and the Sunday Express in
London, the Mainichi Shimbun in Tokyo, and Stern and Der Spiegel in Hamburg.

Irving's reputation first came under vicious attack following the
publication in 1977 of Hitler's War, a monumental work that was hysterically
criticized for its contention that Hitler did not order the extermination of
Europe's Jews. The mass killings must have been carried out by Himmler and
his cohorts behind Hitler's back, Irving concluded at that time.

As a journalist for Time magazine once told him, "Until Hitler's War you
couldn't put a foot wrong, you were the darling of the media. After it, they
heaped slime on you."
So enraged was the Zionist Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith by this
book that the shadowy organization promptly added his name to its
ever-growing list of enemies. As it turned out, the ADL's troubles with
Irving were only just beginning.

The international campaign against him became even more vicious following
the publication in 1981 of Uprising, a history of the 1956 anti-Communist
revolt in Hungary. This book enraged the ADL crowd because it does not
whitewash the significant Jewish role in the Hungarian Communist regime.

Irving has made several highly successful speaking and promotion tours in
Germany, Canada, Australia, South Africa, the United States, and other
countries. German listeners in particular delight in hearing an Englishman
say out loud what many in that country believe in their souls but have been
intimidated into keeping to themselves. In Germany, Irving has become a kind
of conscience for a people who have been largely robbed of their own.

A startling climax in the second "Holocaust Trial" of Ernst Zundel in 1988
was the testimony of Irving, who was the last of 23 defense witnesses. He
stunned the completely packed Toronto courtroom by announcing that he had
changed his mind about the Holocaust story. During his three days on the
stand, he explained in detail why he now endorses the Revisionist view of
the extermination story.

In June 1989, Irving published the British edition of The Leuchter Report.
This handsome, illustrated edition, for which he wrote a foreword, was
launched by him at a press conference in London. He told the journalists
there that the infamous extermination gas chambers of Auschwitz and Majdanek
did not exist, except, perhaps, as the brainchild invention of Britain's
wartime propaganda bureau, the Political Warfare Executive (PWE).

A magnificent 860-page Focal Point edition of Hitler's War was published
last year. Taking account of his most recent research and insights,
references to so-called "extermination camps" have been removed from this
revised edition. And in his introduction, Irving deftly tears apart one
historical legend after another.

This work -- the product of decades of patient research and writing -- has
proven particularly enraging to the enemies of truth in history.

In addition to the usual lies, his adversaries have even turned to criminal
burglary and arson in their fitful and frantic efforts to silence him.

Not long ago, an official of the American Jewish Committee, a certain
Kenneth S. Stern, declared that Irving "NEVER has been considered a serious
historian." (The Oregonian, Portland, Oct. 7, 1992).

That is simply a baldfaced lie.

In fact, Irving's remarkable abilities have been acknowledged by some of the
most prominent names in the field. British historian Hugh Trevor-Roper,
writing in the Sunday Times of London, once declared, "No praise can be too
high for Irving's indefatigable scholarly industry." Trevor-Roper also
called Irving one of the "few guides I would entirely trust . . .
indefatigable in pursuit of the evidence, fearless in face of it, sound in
judgment . . ."

Another prominent British historian, A. J. P. Taylor, once wrote of him:
"David Irving is a patient researcher of unrivalled industry and success."

David John Cawdell Irving was born in Hutton, Essex, England, on March 24,
1938, the son of an illustrator and Royal Navy commander. His father and
mother were both well-known writers. After a liberal arts education at the
four-century-old Sir Anthony Browne's school in Brentwood, Essex, young
Irving won a scholarship to study physics at the Imperial College of Science
and Technology in London.

It did not take long, though, for him to realize that his life's calling
would not be in the hard sciences.

In 1959 he moved to Germany's industrial Ruhr region to spend a year working
in a steel mill to perfect his fluency in German. Then, after a stint
working as a clerk-stenographer with the US Strategic Air Command at an
airbase near Madrid, he returned to England to study political economy at
London's University College.

Irving speaks fluent German, very good Spanish, and quite passable French,
and reads several other languages.

On a personal note, he is the father of four daughters. His hobbies are oil
painting, travel, and cinematography, and his favorite song is the English
naval hymn, "For Those in Peril of the Sea."

He lives in the Mayfair district of London's West End, although in recent
years has spent quite a lot of time at a south Florida retreat, where he now
prefers to do his serious writing.
You'd need a pickup truck to carry away all the newspaper and magazine
clippings that have appeared over the years about Irving.

In January 1992, for example, a flurry of reports appeared in newspapers and
television broadcasts around the world suggesting that he had abandoned his
highly skeptical view of the Holocaust extermination story because of what
he had found in the postwar "memoir" of Adolf Eichmann, the German SS
officer who coordinated the wartime deportations of Jews.
Had Irving defected from the Revisionist camp? In the wake of this uproar,
he told the IHR: "My position remains unchanged." There were "certain
My-Lai-type atrocities" by German troops in the occupied Soviet territories,
but the "gas chambers and factories of death are legend," and there is no
wartime evidence of an order by Hitler to exterminate the Jews. In an
interview at the time with the London Jewish Chronicle (January 17, 1992),
Irving said, "The Jews are very foolish not to abandon the gas chamber
theory while they still have time."

Last May, a German court fined Irving 10,000 marks -- about $6,000 -- for
public statements he had made challenging the Holocaust story. His crime? At
a meeting in Munich in 1990, Irving had said that the building in the
Auschwitz main camp that has been portrayed for years as an extermination
gas chamber is a phony reconstruction (or, in German, "Attrappen").
The Munich district court refused to permit the defense to present even a
single witness or exhibit. For example, it would not permit Irving's
attorneys to call as a witness the director of the Auschwitz State Museum,
Dr. Franciszek Piper, who has privately confirmed on several occasions that
what Irving had told the meeting in 1990 is, in fact, the truth. After his
attorneys dramatically walked out of the courtroom to protest the judge's
outrageous rulings, Irving delivered a stirring plea for truth and justice
that has since been widely circulated in Germany on audio cassette and as a
leaflet. (For more on this trial, see the July-August 1992 IHR Newsletter).

Also last year, Irving played the key and highly publicized role in bringing
to light the long-suppressed diaries of Third Reich propaganda chief Dr.
Joseph Goebbels. Last July, the London Sunday Times, one of the world's most
influential papers, published extensive translated excerpts from the diary,
which Irving found and transcribed. (See report in the October 1992 IHR
Newsletter).

International and British Jewish organizations lost no time in attacking the
paper for employing Irving, and the resulting furor made headlines in
newspapers and magazines around the world. A report in the London Jewish
Chronicle headlined "Sunday Times comes under pressure" (July 17, 1992),
described the extent of the campaign to punish the paper for its
collaboration with Irving. Officials of the American Jewish Committee added
their voices to the worldwide pressure campaign, expressing particular anger
because the historian has addressed several IHR conferences. The Sunday
Times capitulated, and in breach of contract, refused to pay Irving the
agreed-upon fee of 83,000 pounds. He is suing.

On July 3, more than 300 Jewish demonstrators gathered outside Irving's
London residence to denounce him. The next day, July fourth (by the way, the
ninth anniversary of the devastating 1984 arson attack against the IHR
office-warehouse), a larger crowd of several hundred met at the same place
to shout more insults. Among the banners carried by the crowd of Marxists,
Jews, homosexuals and Rastafarians were placards reading "Return to the Road
of Lenin and Trotsky!," and "Build a Bolshevik Party, Tribune of All the
Oppressed!"

That same day, though, about 250 persons defied intimidation and threats to
hear and cheer Irving and other speakers at a Revisionist seminar in London.
Besides Irving, the audience heard addresses by Kirk Lyons, Leuchter's US
attorney, and Georgia attorney Sam Dickson (who addressed the 1986 IHR
conference).

In all this, it is gratifying to note that it is a Revisionist historian who
was -- once again -- at the forefront of historical discovery. In spite of
the well-organized international campaign to boycott and silence him, David
Irving remains at the vanguard of his profession -- and, by the way, SOLELY
on the basis of his indisputable knowledge, skill and industry.
It is also gratifying to realize that, as a result of each of those recent
controversies, hundreds of thousands -- if not millions -- of newspaper and
magazine readers around the world are now aware that a historian of
recognized international stature rejects critical aspects of the orthodox
Holocaust extermination story.

(Based on introduction of Irving at the Eleventh IHR Conference, 1992.
Reprinted by permission from The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 13,
Number 1 (Jan./Feb. 1993): P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA).

Celebrating a Jewish wedding in Westerbork 'Konzentrationslager' Camp,
Holland.

Following are four articles:
1. An opinion piece from a revisionist perspective (written by Bradley R.
Smith) on a typical reaction of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith
(ADL) to a revisionist critique of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in
Washington D.C.

2. The article by ADL spokesman Marvin Stern which appeared in The Oregonian
(Portland, OR) and is representative of the ADL response to what Mr. Stern
describes as "the growing Holocaust revisionist movement."

3. The CODOH advertisment (written by B. R. Smith) criticizing the U.S.
Holocaust Memorial Museum that so exercises the ADL and others. This is the
second major CODOH campus ad.

4. The first (and now-famous) major CODOH campus ad, also written by Bradley
R. Smith.

First a brief note from Bradley R. Smith:

"I suspect that if spokesmen for the Museum, or for the ADL, could answer
any of the questions suggested by the text of the ad, they probably would
not react to it so hysterically.
"The ad or the text of the ad has run in student newspapers at Stanford,
Georgetown, University of Michigan, SUNY-Buffalo, Michigan State, Notre Dame
and at other major campuses.
"If you have any questions or need more background please call me at (209)
627 8757. Thanks, [signed] Bradley R. Smith"
Bradley R. Smith PO Box 3267 Visalia CA 93278 Tel/Fax: (209) 733 2653

The AntiI-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith: Trapped in a Nazi Fantasyland
by Bradley R. Smith
Marvin Stern, director for the Northwest regional branch of the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL), can't conceal his bewilderment over what he
calls "the growing Holocaust revisionist movement."

Mr. Stern expressed his dismay in a column published in The Oregonian, the
largest-circulation daily in the Northwest. His alarm was triggered by the
appearance in that newspaper of our ad, "A Revisionist's View of the U.S.
Holocaust Memorial Museum."

He lays the blame for the growing influence of revisionism on the
"ignorance" and "anti-semitism" of Americans. He appears not to understand
that he's charging tens of millions of American citizens with being
ignorant, anti-Jewish bigots (a recent Roper poll reported 20 to 30 percent
of adult Americans doubt they are being told the truth about the Holocaust
story).

Spokesmen for the ADL have propagandized themselves into an empty
intellectual corner. Having refused to judge revisionist research on its
merits, refusing still to admit that revisionists have any substantive
arguments whatever, refusing debate or even an exchange of civility, the
ADL'ers are left with no intellectual tools to work with but invective,
misrepresentation, slander, and a sickly dependence on playing their "nazi"
card.

One result of this intellectually and psychologically stunted behavior is
that many ADL'ers appear to be obsessed with nazis and nazism, neo-nazis,
intimations of nazism, rumors about nazis and crazy nazi conspiracies to
rehabilitate Adolf's reputation.

Some ADL'ers, Stern appearing to be one of them, live in an imaginary nazi
wonderland where they fantasize armies of nazis marching toward them from
distant horizons, singing songs of conquest, whips in hand, about to leap
through the ADL office window to lash the hapless drudges inside and
mistreat them sexually. Such fantasies must be traumatizing for those who
suffer them, but to others they can appear comic and infantile.

The text of my ad, which prompted Stern's response, makes at least two
claims which admittedly are controversial. It asserts that the Holocaust
Museum exhibits no proof that homicidal gas chambers existed anywhere in
Europe, and no proof that even one child, woman or man was "gassed" at any
German camp liberated by the Allies. I flew to Washington, toured the
Museum, and that's my assessment of its exhibits.

Mr. Stern writes that the best response to the "outrageous lies" of
revisionism, that is, the text of my ad about the Museum, is to "reiterate
the truth" and "repeat the facts." It's good advice, but Stern avoids it
like the plague. Instead, he reveals the common ADL self-serving obsession
with hate movements growing like cancers in American society. He doesn't
even try to assure his readers that the Museum does, in fact, exhibit proof
of one gas chamber or one victim of a gas chamber. Why?

The Marvin Sterns and the ADL face a conundrum. They can continue to rail
with empty irrationalism against legitimate revisionist research and watch
the number of Americans who are increasingly unsure what to believe about
the Holocaust story increase year after year.

Or they can turn to the orthodox scholars in the field for help in
responding to revisionist questions. That would be the adult thing to do.
The ADL'ers however, true to form, have chosen to do the childish thing --
to substitute schoolyard insults for a grown-up exchange of ideas.

Stern's article in The Oregonian ran under the head, "Holocaust Revisionists
Should Be Challenged, Repudiated With Truth." Marvin and I are in complete
agreement on this one. Do it! Challenge the claims in my ad with truth! That
has always been what I've asked for. It's my invitation to the ADL'ers and
my challenge to them -- and to all others. Respond to my ads with truth. I
don't EVER want to run an ad that contains an inadvertent error of fact.

Why do the Marvin Sterns talk about repudiating revisionism with "truth" and
always evade doing so? Here's my guess. While revisionists almost certainly
are not right about everything, we're not wrong about everything either. No
one is wrong about everything! That's what terrifies Marvin Stern and his
ADL buddies. The day they admit the possibility that revisionists are not
wrong about everything, their psychological world will collapse. They'll
have admitted that revisionists are human beings, that we eat our soup with
a spoon just like they do.
And there's the rub. The ADL'ers can't afford to admit that revisionists are
ordinary men and women -- that is, human beings. The ADL committed itself to
its nazi devil fantasy half a century ago and has ridden it so long so
successfully it can't get off, no matter how broken down and exhausted the
old nag is.

Marvin Stern is probably a nice guy. He's probably a smart guy. When a smart
guy goes over the line and becomes a true believer it's almost impossible
for him to change his mind. When a true believer changes his mind he becomes
an apostate. He feels like a traitor. A dumb guy can just change his mind
and go about his business. A smart guy who's become a true believer has to
work out a theory explaining how, being so smart, he could have believed
something so dumb so long. It's not easy. I know.

Marvin, I used to believe everything about the Holocaust story you believe
now. It's not a sin to be wrong. It's human. You have a theory you believe
is true, I have a theory I think is true. Let's talk things over. You know
how it goes. I listen to you. You listen to me. We have a beer. We settle
the world's problems.
(Bradley R. Smith is director of Committee for Open Debate on the
Holocaust.)

A Revisionist's View of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museumin Washington,
D.C.
by Bradley R. Smith

After ten years in the planning, $165 million in start-up costs and a
government guarantee of tens of millions more in tax subsidies, the United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum demonstrates why, according to a Roper
Organization poll, 22 percent (some 25 millions!) of all adult Americans
have doubts about the orthodox Holocaust story.

What are the facts?

The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum displays no proof anywhere of homicidal
"gassing" chambers and no proof that even ONE INDIVIDUAL was "gassed" at any
camp liberated by Allied armies.

"Proof" for a gas chamber at Birkenau is a plastic model created by a Polish
ARTISTE. A plastic copy of a metal door is displayed as "proof" of a
homicidal gas chamber at Maidanek. And, INCREDIBLY, the Museum has simply
"dropped" the Auschwitz gas chamber, the basement room visited yearly by
hundreds of thousands of tourists in Poland.

There is no mention of the alleged gas chambers at Buchenwald or even at
Dachau, where after World War Two American G.I.s and German civilians were
assured that more than 200,000 victims were "gassed and burned."

Human soap? Human skin lamp shades? Not a sign of them in this Museum. These
monstrous lies are now all gone -- straight down the memory hole!

The notion that eyewitness testimony given under highly politicized and
emotional circumstances, which this museum relies so heavily on, is, PRIMA
FACIE, true, was refuted by the Israeli Supreme Court when it acquitted John
Demjanjuk of being "Ivan the Terrible." The Israeli Court found that the
eyewitnesses who testified against Demjanjuk could not be believed!

Deborah Lipstadt argues in her much-praised Denying the Holocaust, that
revisionists ["deniers"] should not be debated because there "can not be"
another side to the Holocaust story. She charges that it is "hateful" to
listen to a defense of those accused of mass murder! In essence, she argues
that we bury America's old civil virtues of free inquiry and open debate --
but to what end?

The Deborah Lipstadts -- and there is a clique of them on every campus --
work to suppress revisionist research and demand that students and faculty
ape their fascist behavior. If you refuse to accept the Lipstadt clique as
your intellectual FUHRERS, you risk being slandered as an "anti-semite."
These quasi religious Holocaust zealots claim that because of the "purity"
of their own feelings about the Jewish experience during World War Two,
yours are soiled if you doubt what they preach as "truth."

Winston Churchill, in his massive six-volume history of World War Two, and
Dwight D. Eisenhower in his memoirs, both omitted all reference to "gas
chambers" and their use in an alleged "genocide" of the Jews. How do the
Museum and the Deborah Lipstadts explain that?

To many it will appear impossible that deception on such a grand scale can
actually be taking place. Yet such deception is not unusual in the realms of
politics, ideology or religion. We are being deceived for one reason, and
one reason only -- we have refused to listen to the other side of the story.

The Operation and Technique of the Museum

The Museum's exhibit technique is a mixture of sinister suggestion and
dishonest omission. The first display confronting visitors beginning the
Museum tour is a wall-sized photograph of American soldiers looking at
corpses smoldering on a pyre. The "context" in which you see the photo
suggests that the dead are "exterminated" Jews.

But were the prisoners killed or did they die of typhus or some other
disease during the last terrible weeks of the war? Autopsies made by Allied
medical personnel found that inmates died of disease. Not one was found to
have been "gassed." ALL SUCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IS PURPOSELY OMITTED FROM
THE EXHIBIT. WE DON'T EVEN KNOW THAT THE DEAD PICTURED IN THE PHOTO ARE
JEWS!

Unable to judge the significance of the photograph, and not wanting to
believe the Museum would mislead you, you are moved to accept the false and
manipulative suggestion that it represents the "genocide" of the Jews.

THE LAST BARRIER

Academic bureaucrats, career-driven professors and an opulent Holocaust
Lobby of self-described intellectual "giants" are those who form the last
barrier against a free exchange of ideas. It is childish and dishonest to
insinuate that open debate is "dangerous" to the Jewish community. Don't
believe it! Open debate BENEFITS Jews and Gentiles alike -- for precisely
the same reasons!

Contact CODOH to inquire about speakers or to view our one-hour video on the
scandal of the Auschwitz "gas chamber." Demonstrate to the fuhrers of
conformity on your campus that you want intellectual liberty, not "leaders."

This ad [when published in newspapers] has been published and paid for by
CODOH Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
PO Box 3267 Visalia CA 93278 Tel/Fax: 209 733 2653
(CODOH) was founded to promote a free exchange of ideas about the Holocaust
story. CODOH is not a membership organization and is not affiliated with any
political party or group. Only your contributions enable us to publish this
ad in college and high school newspapers across the country. Our overhead is
minimal. Every donation is welcome. Your support is needed. 1093

THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY: The Case For Open Debate
by Bradley R. Smith

THE CONTEMPORARY ISSUE

No subject enrages campus Thought Police more than Holocaust Revisionism. We
debate every other great historical issue as a matter of course, but
influential pressure groups with private agendas have made the Holocaust
story an exception. Elitist dogma manipulated by special interest groups
corrupts everything in academia. Students should be encouraged to
investigate the Holocaust story the same way they are encouraged to
investigate every other historical event. This isn't a radical point of
view. The premises for it were worked out centuries ago during a little
something called the Enlightenment.

THE HISTORICAL ISSUE
Revisionists agree with establishment historians that the German National
Socialist State singled out the Jewish people for special and cruel
treatment. In addition to viewing Jews in the framework of traditional
anti-Semitism, the Nazis also saw them as being an influential force behind
international communism. During the Second World War, Jews were considered
to be enemies of the State and a potential danger to the war effort, much
like the Japanese were viewed in this country. Consequently, Jews were
stripped of their rights, forced to live in ghettos, conscripted for labor,
deprived of their property, deported from the countries of their birth and
otherwise mistreated. Many tragically perished in the maelstrom.
Revisionists part company with establishment historians in that Revisionists
deny that the German State had a policy to exterminate the Jewish people (or
anyone else) by putting them to death in gas chambers or killing them
through abuse or neglect. Revisionists also maintain that the figure of 6
million Jewish deaths is an irresponsible exaggeration, and that no
execution gas chambers existed in any camp in Europe which was under German
control. Fumigation gas chambers did exist to delouse clothing and equipment
to prevent disease at the camps. It is very likely that it was from this
life-SAVING procedure that the myth of extermination gas chambers emerged.

Revisionists generally hold that the Allied governments decided to carry
their wartime "black propaganda" of German monstrosity over into the postwar
period. This was done for essentially three reasons. First, they felt it
necessary to continue to justify the great sacrifices that were made in
fighting two world wars. A second reason was that they wanted to divert
attention from and to justify their own particularly brutal crimes against
humanity which, apart from Soviet atrocities, involved massive incendiary
bombings of the civilian populations of German and Japanese cities. The
third and perhaps most important reason was that they needed justification
for the postwar arrangements which, among other things, involved the
annexation of large parts of Germany into Poland. These territories were not
disputed borderlands but included huge parts of Germany proper. The millions
of Germans living in these regions were to be dispossessed of their property
and brutally expelled from their homelands. Many hundreds of thousands were
to perish in the process. A similar fate was to befall the Sudetan Germans.

During the war, and in the postwar era as well, Zionist organizations joined
with the Allied Governments and became deeply involved in creating and
promulgating anti-German hate propaganda. There is little doubt that their
purpose was to drum up world sympathy and political and financial support
for Jewish causes, especially for the formation of the State of Israel.
Today, while the political benefits of the Holocaust story have largely
dissipated for the others, the story still plays an important role in the
ambitions of Zionist and other organizations in the Jewish community. It is
the leaders of these political and propaganda organizations who continue to
work to sustain the orthodox Holocaust legend and the myth of German
monstrosity during the Second World War.

Those who would claim that these interpretations are anti-Jewish are reading
into them something which simply is not there. Revisionists do not claim
that Jewish leaders or organizations did anything in the war and postwar era
which the Allied Governments themselves did not do.

For those who believe that the Nuremberg Trials revealed the truth about
German war crimes, it is a bracing shock to discover that the then Chief
Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Harlan Fiske Stone, described the
Nuremberg court as "a high-grade lynching party for Germans."

THE PHOTOGRAPHS
We've all seen "The Photographs." Endlessly. Newsreel photos taken by U.S.
and British photographers at the liberation of the German camps, and
especially the awful scenes at Dachau, Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen. These
films are typically presented in such a way in which it is either stated or
implied that the scenes resulted from deliberate policies on the part of the
Germans. The photographs are real. The uses to which they have been put are
base.

There was no German policy at any of those camps to deliberately kill the
internees. In the last months of the war, while Soviet armies were advancing
on Germany from the east, the British and U.S. air arms were destroying
every major city in Germany with saturation bombing. Transportation, the
food distribution system and medical and sanitation services all broke down.
That was the purpose of the Allied bombing, which has been described as the
most barbarous form of warfare in Europe since the Mongol invasions.

Millions of refugees fleeing the Soviet armies were pouring into Germany.
The camps still under German control were overwhelmed with internees from
the east. By early 1945 the inmate population was swept by malnutrition and
by epidemics of typhus, typhoid, dysentery and chronic diarrhea. Even the
mortuary systems broke down. When the press entered the camps with British
and U.S. soldiers, they found the results of all that. They took "The
Photographs."

Still, at camps such as Buchenwald, Dachau and Bergen-Belsen TENS OF
THOUSANDS of relatively healthy internees were liberated. They were there in
the camps when "The Photographs" were taken. There are newsreels of those
internees walking through the camp streets laughing and talking. Others
picture exuberant internees throwing their caps in the air and cheering
their liberators. It is only natural to ask why you haven't seen those
particular films and photos while you've seen the others scores and even
hundreds of times.

Jewish internees playing football at Theresienstadt 'Konzentrationslager'
Camp.
DOCUMENTS

Spokesmen for the Holocaust Lobby like to assure us that there are "tons" of
captured German documents which prove the Jewish genocide. When challenged
on this, however, they can produce only a handful of documents, the
authenticity or interpretation of which is always highly questionable. If
pressed for reliable documentation, the Lobby will then reverse itself and
claim that the Germans destroyed all of the relevant documents to hide their
evil deeds, or it will make the absurd claim that the Germans used a
simplistic code language or whispered verbal orders for mass murder into
each others' ears.

With regard to the alleged genocide of the European Jews, all available
documentation indicates that there was no order for it, no budget, no weapon
(that is, no so-called execution gas chamber) and no victim (that is, not a
single autopsied body at any camp has been shown to have been gassed).

EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY
As documentary "proofs" for the mass-murder of the European Jews fall by the
wayside, Holocaust historians depend increasingly on "eye- witness"
testimonies to support their theories. Many of these testimonies are
ludicrously unreliable. History is filled with stories of masses of people
claiming to be eyewitnesses to everything from witchcraft to flying saucers.

During and after the war there were "eyewitnesses" to mass murder in gas
chambers at Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Dachau and other camps in Germany
proper. Today, virtually all recognized scholars dismiss this eyewitness
testimony as false, and agree that there were no extermination gas chambers
in any camp in Germany proper.

Establishment historians, however, still claim that extermination gas
chambers existed at Auschwitz and at other camps in Poland. The eyewitness
testimony and the evidence for this claim is, in reality, qualitatively no
different than the false testimony and evidence for the alleged gas chambers
at the camps in Germany proper.

During the war crimes trials many "eyewitnesses" testified that Germans made
soap out of human fat and lamp shades from human skin. Allied prosecutors
even produced evidence to support these charges. For decades, highly
respected scholars at the most prestigious universities in the Western world
sanctioned these stories, leading us to believe that they were "irrefutable
truths." But with time, many such stories have become untenable, and in May
1990 Yehuda Bauer, director of Holocaust studies at Hebrew University in Tel
Aviv, admitted that: "The Nazis never made soap from Jews . . ." (quoted in
The Jerusalem Post, International Edition, 5 May 1990, p. 6). This is only
one recent example where an "irrefutable" Holocaust "truth" has been exposed
as a monstrous lie.

With regard to confessions by Germans at war crimes trials, it is now well
documented that many were obtained through coercion, intimidation and even
physical torture.

AUSCHWITZ
British Historian David Irving, perhaps the most widely read historian
writing in English, has called the Auschwitz death-camp story a "sinking
ship" and states that there were "no gas chambers at Auschwitz . . ."

The Auschwitz State Museum has recently revised its half-century-old claim
that 4 million humans were murdered there. The Museum now says maybe it was
1 million. But what proof does the Museum provide to document the 1 million
figure? None! The communist propagandists who manage the museum have put on
display piles of hair, boots and eyeglasses, etc. While such displays are
effective propaganda devices, they are worthless as historical documentation
for "gassings" or a program of "extermination."

Meanwhile, Revisionists want to know where those 3 million souls have been
the last 45 years. Were they part of the fabled Six Million?

Those who promote the Holocaust story complain that "the whole world" was
indifferent to the genocide which allegedly was occurring in German occupied
Europe. When asked why this was the case the promoters usually respond by
saying that it was due to some great moral flaw in the nature of Western
man. At other times they make the absurd claim that people did not realize
the enormity of what was happening. It is true that the world responded with
indifference. How else should people have responded to that which they did
not believe, and which for them was a non-event?

It is certain that if there had been "killing factories" in Poland murdering
millions of civilians, then the Red Cross, the Pope, humanitarian agencies,
the Allied governments, neutral governments, and prominent figures such as
Roosevelt, Truman, Churchill, Eisenhower and many others would have known
about it and would have often and unambiguously mentioned it, and condemned
it. They didn't! The promoters admit that only a tiny group of individuals
believed the story at the time -- many of whom were connected with Jewish
propaganda agencies. The rise of the Holocaust story reads more like the
success story of a PR campaign than anything else.

Winston Churchill wrote the six volumes of his monumental work, The Second
World War, without mentioning a program of mass-murder and genocide. Maybe
it slipped his mind. Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his memoir Crusade in Europe,
also failed to mention gas chambers. Was the weapon used to murder millions
of Jews unworthy of a passing reference? Was our future president being
insensitive to Jews?

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND HOLOCAUST REVISIONISM
Many people, when they first hear Holocaust Revisionist arguments, find
themselves bewildered. The arguments appear to make sense, but "How is it
possible?" The whole world believes the Holocaust story. It's just not
plausible that so great a conspiracy to suppress the truth could have
functioned for half a century.

To understand how it could very well have happened, one needs only to
reflect on the intellectual and political orthodoxies of medieval Europe, or
those of Nazi Germany or the Communist-bloc countries. In all of these
societies the great majority of scholars were caught up in the existing
political culture. Committed to a prevailing ideology and its interpretation
of reality, these scholars and intellectuals felt it was their right, and
even their duty, to protect every aspect of that ideology. They did so by
oppressing the evil dissidents who expressed "offensive" or "dangerous"
ideas. In every one of those societies, scholars became Thought Police.

In our own society, in the debate over the question of political
correctness, there are those who deliberately attempt to trivialize the
issues. They claim that there is no real problem with freedom of speech on
our campuses, and that all that is involved with PC are a few rules which
would defend minorities from those who would hurt their feelings. There is,
of course, a deeper and more serious aspect to the problem. On American
campuses today there is a wide range of ideas and viewpoints that are
forbidden to be discussed openly. Even obvious facts and realities, when
they are politically unacceptable, are denied and suppressed. One can learn
much about the psychology and methodology of Thought Police by watching how
they react when just one of their taboos is broken and Holocaust Revisionism
is given a public forum.

First they express outrage that such offensive and dangerous ideas were
allowed to be expressed publicly. They avoid answering or debating these
ideas, claiming that to do so would give them a forum and legitimacy. Then
they make vicious personal attacks against the Revisionist heretic, calling
him dirty political names such as "anti- Semite," "racist" or "neo-Nazi,"
and they even suggest that he is a potential mass murderer. They publicly
accuse the Revisionist of lying, but they don't allow the heretic to hear
the specific charge against him or to face his accusers so that he can
answer this slander.

The Holocausters accuse Revisionists of being hate filled people who are
promoting a doctrine of hatred. But Revisionism is a scholarly process, not
a doctrine or ideology. If the Holocaust promoters really want to expose
hatred, they should take a second look at their own doctrines, and a long
look at themselves in the mirror.

Anyone on campus who invites a Revisionist to speak is himself attacked as
being insensitive. When a Revisionist does speak on campus he is oftentimes
shouted down and threatened. Campus libraries and bookstores face
intimidation when they consider handling Holocaust revisionist materials.
All this goes on while the majority of faculty and university administrators
sit dumbly by, allowing political activists to determine what can be said
and what can be read on their campus.

Next, the Thought Police set out to destroy the transgressor professionally
and financially by "getting" him at his job or concocting a lawsuit against
him. The courts are sometimes used to attack Revisionism. The Holocausters
often deceptively claim that Revisionist scholarship has been proven false
during a trial. The fact is that Revisionist arguments have never been
evaluated or judged by the courts.

Finally, the Thought Police try to "straighten out" that segment of academia
or the media that allowed the Revisionists a forum in the first place.

It can be an instructive intellectual exercise to identify taboo subjects,
other than Holocaust Revisionism, which would evoke comparable responses
from Thought Police on our campuses.

Recently, some administrators in academia have held that university
administrations should take actions to rid the campus of ideas which are
disruptive to the university. This is a very dangerous position for
administrators to take. It is an open invitation to tyranny. It means that
any militant group with "troops at the ready" can rid the campus of ideas it
opposes and then impose its own orthodoxy. The cowardly administrator finds
it much easier and safer to rid the campus of controversial ideas than to
face down a group of screaming and snarling militants. But it is the duty of
university administrators to insure that the university remains a free
marketplace of ideas. When ideas cause disruptions, it is the disrupters who
must be subdued, not the ideas.

CONCLUSION
The influence of Holocaust Revisionism is growing steadily both here and
abroad. In the United States, Revisionism was launched in earnest in 1977
with the publication of the book The Hoax of the Twentieth Century by Arthur
R. Butz. Professor Butz teaches electrical engineering and computer sciences
at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.
Those who take up the Revisionist cause represent a wide spectrum of
political and philosophical positions. They are certainly not the
scoundrels, liars and demons the Holocaust Lobby tries to make them out to
be. The fact is, there are no demons in the real world. People are at their
worst when they begin to see their opponents as an embodiment of evil, and
then begin to demonize them. Such people are preparing to do something
simply awful to their opponents. Their logic is that you can do anything you
want to a demon.
That logic will not succeed.
* * *
For those wishing to verify the truthfulness of statements made in this
paper, you may want to contact experts who are prominent authorities on
these matters. It's important to ask specific, concrete questions on matters
of fact and receive direct and unambiguous answers. Organizations such as
the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Hillel and the Anti-Defamation League are not
scholarly institutions, but are primarily political and propaganda
organizations.

Auschwitz Director Comes Clean About Fraudulent "Gas Chamber"
An exclusive videotape interview Debunks a major part of the "Holocaust"
story, and reveals the deception that is STILL GOING ON. . . !
This is a video that will make you ask -- "Just how much of the 'Holocaust'
story can we believe?" -- as you learn of falsified "proofs" and deceptive
claims about "gas chambers," not from the mouths of Holocaust "revisionists"
but in the words of one of the most knowledgeable and ardent supporters of
the orthodox "Holocaust" story. This is a video that affirms what
revisionists have maintained for years: that the Soviets and Poles made a
practice of "creating" proofs of "homicidal gas chambers" AFTER World War
Two, and that the hundreds of thousands of tourists who journey to Auschwitz
each year to see for themselves proof of the "final solution" are being
deceived.

In this unprecedented interview given to Jewish revisionist David Cole, (who
has debated the "Holocaust" nationally on the Montel Williams Show and has
been profiled by CBS' 48 Hours), Dr. Franciszek Piper, Senior Curator and
Director of Archives at the Auschwitz State Museum states on camera that the
alleged "homicidal gas chamber" at the Auschwitz main camp shown off to
tourists from all over the world as being in its "original state" is, in
fact, a RECONSTRUCTION, redesigned AFTER THE WAR to look like a gas chamber.

Dr. Piper reveals to David Cole, on camera, how walls were knocked down and
holes with "Zyklon B induction chimneys" installed in the roof so that the
building could be exhibited as a "proof" of the "final solution." And he
doesn't stop there. For a solid hour Dr. Piper talks about other "proofs" at
Auschwitz for the "final solution" which are ALSO "reconstructions," and
discusses details of the camp that only a man such as he, who has worked at
Auschwitz for a quarter century, would know. Then, in stunning footage,
you'll see David Cole, while on the official tour of Auschwitz, being told
by his guide that the Auschwitz main-camp "gas chamber" is in its ORIGINAL
STATE, the same -- and there's no other word for it -- lie told to all
tourists. The uncomfortable conclusion cannot be avoided: the people who run
Auschwitz tell people things that THEY THEMSELVES KNOW ARE NOT TRUE!
Will you be able to argue with the words of a respected "Holocaust" scholar
when he states for the record that one of the main "proofs" of the "final
solution" is NO PROOF AT ALL?
(Video available from: "CODOH," POB 3267 Visalia CA 93278, or the Institute
for Historical Review P.O. Box 2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659).

"We're Loud, We're Proud, & Best of All, We're Right!"

A JEWISH REVISIONIST'S VISIT TO AUSCHWITZ by (Jew) David Cole
(Presented at the Eleventh IHR Conference, October 1992)
When I decided last September to take a well-deserved vacation, I thought,
what better destination than Europe. After all, as a Revisionist, I'd always
felt it my duty to see the concentration camps in person. My girl-friend,
though, said that she'd like to go to Europe to visit Euro-Disney, the new
Disneyland theme park in France. So I thought for a while about where to go:
Auschwitz or Euro-Disney. And as I looked around, and saw the miserable
state of the world and this country, the political and social malaise and
depression, I realized that if I did take a vacation, I wanted to go to a
place as far away from reality as possible: a fantasy land of wondrous fairy
tales. So, of course, I chose Auschwitz.

Now that I've gone through the Auschwitz main camp, Auschwitz-Birkenau,
Majdanek, Mauthausen, and Dachau, I feel even more secure in my position as
a Revisionist that there exists no convincing evidence that Jews or anyone
else were taken EN MASSE into gas chambers and killed by the Nazis at these
camps. In fact, the remains that I inspected at the camp sites seem, in many
different ways, to directly contradict these claims.

I returned to the United States with more than 25 hours of video footage
from the camps. At Majdanek I uncovered obvious tampering with the buildings
exhibited as gas chambers. This evidence was discovered when my attractive
camerawoman busted a lock and got us into a room that is not open to
tourists. There we were able to view several items in their original state,
most notably the doors, which were clearly constructed to latch from both
the outside AND the inside.

(DAVID COLE [is a Jew who] was raised and educated in Los Angeles, where he
lives and works. Because of his support for Holocaust Revisionism, he was
assaulted during a meeting at the University of California at Los Angeles on
January 22, 1992, by thugs of the Jewish Defense League, who hit him in the
face and bloodied his nose. JDL leader Irv Rubin also tried to push Cole
down a flight of stairs. In April 1992 he appeared -- along with Journal
editor Mark Weber -- as a guest on the Montel Williams Show, a nationally
syndicated television program, to present the Revisionist view of the
Holocaust story).

The high point of my visit, though, was my interview with Dr. Franciszek
Piper, Senior Curator of the Polish government's Auschwitz State Museum. He
has worked there for more than 26 years. On tape, he admits that the
so-called gas chamber in Crematory Building (Krema) I, which is shown to
half a million visitors a year as a genuine homicidal gas chamber, is in
fact a reconstruction -- even down to the holes cut into the ceiling. Piper
also admits that walls were knocked down and bathroom facilities removed. He
went on to tell us that the remains of the "white cottage," supposed site of
the first preliminary gassings at Birkenau, are also reconstructed. This was
hardly news to me. Even a quick examination of the remains of the "white
cottage" shows that the bricks are not connected in any way, but are simply
laid on top of each other like children's building blocks.

Piper has no problems with the Leuchter Report. He told me that he agrees
with Leuchter's findings regarding traces of ferro-ferric-cyanide in the
walls of Crematory Buildings (Kremas) I, II and III. So what is his
explanation for this lack of traces in the supposed homicidal gas chambers
when, by contrast, there are significant traces in the non-homicidal
delousing chambers? He told me that the amount of hydrogen cyanide (from
Zyklon) supposedly used by Germans to kill people -- unlike the amount
needed to kill lice in delousing chambers -- was not enough to leave blue
(ferro-ferric-cyanide) staining, or appreciable traces.

This argument has problems, though. For one thing, the supposed homicidal
gas chambers at Majdanek (which in reality were non-homicidal delousing
chambers) have abundant blue staining. So according to Piper's "Holocaust
logic," gassing people in Auschwitz did not leave blue stains, but gassing
people at Majdanek did. Talk about a Magic Kingdom! As we spoke, I half
expected to see Piper's nose grow as long as Pinocchio's!

The importance of Piper's revelations is obvious. The burden of proof has
now shifted decisively to the Exterminationist side. For example, Piper's
admission that the four holes in the ceiling of Crematory Building (Krema) I
were put in after the war makes ludicrous the oft-repeated claim of
Auschwitz tourists that "Now I've seen the gas chambers with my own two
eyes." Now that the often-made claims about Krema I in its present state are
no longer valid, can the Exterminationists produce ANY evidence -- a
photograph, document, plan or order -- showing that the supposed gas chamber
there was EVER used to kill people as alleged? Most likely not, but what
else is new? We've never been asked to accept the Holocaust story on
anything but faith, and for me, that's not good enough.

On the issue of the Holocaust -- and perhaps uniquely on this issue -- we
are told: "Close the books, there will be no more learning, no more
discussion, no more questions. Not only will no questions be tolerated, but
anyone who dares to ask such questions will be slandered and viciously
attacked."

Now, as someone who believes that part of being human is to learn something
new every day, I respond: "How dare you tell me there will be no more
learning?" The establishment that maintains the Holocaust story on life
support admits that there is no direct proof of homicidal gassings. No
order, no document, no pictures, only "eyewitnesses."

And what of these eyewitnesses? The Holocaust lobby insists that this is
convincing evidence. But what kind of evidence is this? In some European
countries, a person who denies the gas chambers can be jailed, fined, or
physically attacked. He might lose his job, his standing in the community,
maybe even his life. Something similar has happened in Canada. In the United
States, he might be attacked and vilified. And if he says that he comes by
his knowledge from first-hand experience -- in other words from helping to
run the camps during the war years -- then he might easily find himself
deported to Israel or eastern Europe, where he might be sentenced to death
or at least stripped of his US citizenship and denied due process.

In other words, we only hear of eyewitnesses from one side because witnesses
from the other side have been strong-armed into silence. This is
governmental coercion of the worst kind, and on a worldwide scale no less.
One kind of eyewitness is encouraged, the other kind if warned that his
words might lead to deportation, imprisonment, loss of livelihood, property,
and even life. Some great victory for the Holocaust lobby: The game has been
fixed!

Let people speak! If for no one else, I demand this for my own sake. I want
to know what happened during World War Two, and yet how can I if those who
might have firsthand knowledge are told: "Speak only the official line, or
suffer the consequences." I insist on my human right to learn.

There are those who say, "Okay, so maybe the Holocaust is a bit exaggerated,
but do we really want to destabilize society by openly talking about all
this, possibly encouraging hostility against Jews?" This raises an important
philosophical question: Do you believe mankind to be so inherently cruel and
stupid that people must be lied to in order to make them behave? If so, then
the lies you tell them are only a small bandage to cover up a much greater
evil: Lack of confidence in mankind's ability to handle the truth. And if
you truly believe that people cannot handle the truth, but instead need a
"Big Brother" to handle it for them, then surely democracy is the most
dangerous thing on earth.

Of course, I understand that people can be cruel and stupid, but I also
believe in the human ability to learn, and to grow with each new piece of
knowledge. Rather than censor information that we subjectively perceive to
be "dangerous," we should teach our children to think critically, to remain
open-minded, and to look for truth rather than cling to emotionally
appealing falsehoods.

And that is just about all we can do: teach our children and hope for the
best, realizing that people cannot be programmed like robots. Eighty years
of failed Communism should have taught us that. To use the power of the
state to force men to be what the state defines as "good" creates a world
far more hellish than the one that is supposedly being prevented. I would
rather live in a world where people are free to be cruel and stupid than one
in which "goodness" is enforced at gun point.

Keep in mind also that truth, objective truth, does not need threats and
intimidation to prevail. We Holocaust Revisionists are often likened to
those who said that the earth was flat. But just the reverse is true: It is
the other side that acts like a Holy Inquisition, institutionalizing one
viewpoint and punishing heretics. Remember: We only accepted that the earth
is round after the debate was opened. And since then, the round-earth
adherents have not needed false news laws, hate crimes laws, and libel or
slander laws to protect the truthfulness of their view. Likewise, all we ask
is that the Holocaust story either stand or fall according to the
evidence -- or lack of it.

While we Holocaust Revisionists sit on a wealth of wonderfully heretical
information, can we get it out to the general public? Can we "mainstream"
Holocaust Revisionism before it's too late, that is to say, before all those
who have firsthand information of what really happened die off entirely?

As a Jew, it would be wrong for me not to mention the issue of Jewish
influence. Influence is a very strange thing. People spend so much time and
energy to acquire it, and then an equal amount of time and energy denying
they have it. Jewish influence does exist. If it didn't, why would billions
of dollars be spent annually by Jewish lobbying groups? That money isn't to
pay for dance lessons for Senators and Congressmen, of course, it's for
influence. Jews must come to terms with the fact that they are not only a
powerful and influential group, but have responsibilities that come with
that -- particularly the responsibility not to abuse power, or, more
specifically, to avoid abusing people with that power.

It is a testament to the strength of Revisionist research and scholarship,
and to Revisionist tenacity, that all the Jewish influence in the world has
not erased this movement. Despite the best efforts of our most clever and
determined adversaries, Revisionist books are still read, and the Institute
for Historical Review continues to function.

But how much progress are we really making in getting our message to the
public? Unfortunately, we've been making only tiny, pussycat steps. I am not
a patient man. Every day, I fool myself into thinking that I can be
patient -- I can't. I don't want to be a guerrilla fighter of the political
underground for the rest of my life. The time has come, indeed has never
been better, to take Revisionist scholarship to the rest of the world, and
if the powers that be try to stop us, we either go around them or, if
necessary, we go right through them.
TWO MORE YEARS! That's my new motto. In two years' time, Holocaust
Revisionism should be in the mainstream, squarely in the public eye.

I am sure that we will eventually succeed in getting out our message.
Information can be suppressed for just so long. But that's not enough for
me. It's not enough that fellow Revisionists recognize Professor Faurisson's
scholarship for the brilliant work it is. I want it to be WIDELY recognized
as such, and in his lifetime!

So let's make a concerted effort. Mindful of the recent Jewish New Year, I
hereby make a Jewish New Year's resolution: Two more years! No more sitting
in the back of the ideological bus. We're loud, we're proud, and best of
all, we're right!

(Institute for Historical Review P.O. Box 2739 * Newport Beach, CA 92659.
Reprinted by permission from The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 13,
Number 2 (Mar./Apr. 1993): P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA).

Shekel coin and notes issued by 'Konzentrationslager' bank funded to over
M54 million.

Whitewashing Hitler
Taking the Gas Out of Nazi Infamy by Jim Redden

Some historians say Hitler had no master plan to exterminate the Jews in
World War II . . . But what are Nazis without the Holocaust?

Irving declares that he has never come across a document proving that Hitler
ordered the total eradication of European Jews.

October 16, 1992: David Irving, a British historian specializing in World
War II, is speaking at Mount Hood Community College near Portland, Oregon.
Irving is an advocate of Holocaust revisionism, a controversial movement
that disputes the historical accuracy of the widely held version of what
happened to European Jews at the hands of the Germans during Hitler's Third
Reich.

Police dressed in riot gear line the road that leads to the windowless
building where Irving is scheduled to talk. The police have been summoned to
protect people who wish to attend Irving's speech from an angry mob
harassing everyone who tries to enter the building. An elderly couple slips
through the corridor of Plexiglass shields held by police and reaches the
front doors. From the mob, a young man yells, "We know where you live!"

Shaken, the couple approaches a police officer stationed in the lobby. "They
said they know where we live," the man says in a quavering voice. The cop
answers coolly, "I'm sorry, sir, but there's nothing we can do about that,"
leaving the couple to wonder if a late-night fire bombing is the price they
will pay for attending a history lecture.

* * * *
At age 54, David Irving has authored more than a dozen books on World War
II. Unlike many chroniclers of the past, Irving does not rely on the
writings of other historians when researching his works, but insists on
seeing original documents whenever possible. According to the New York Times
Book Review, "Mr. Irving is an indefatigable interviewer, a prodigy of
enterprise and industry, a researcher who almost literally [leaves] no stone
unturned and [succeeds] in digging up papers, letters and diaries which
[are] believed to be lost or nonexistent, or which escaped, for other
reasons, earlier writers. His dogged persistence puts many professional
historians to shame."

After more than ten years researching declassified war records, Irving
declares that he has never come across a document proving that Hitler
ordered the total eradication of European Jews, no written or other
correspondence proving that Hitler was aware of concentration-camp gassings,
and no evidence that Hitler ordered the death of the Jews in any of the
top-secret Nazi radio transmissions that were intercepted by the Allies
during the war.

As a result of this research, Irving concluded that Hitler did not, in fact,
order the notorious Final Solution.

Irving calls the Holocaust a legend. "Historians have all been busy quoting
each other. They've been pumping hot air into this bubble, and the bubble
has been getting bigger and bigger and more and more unstable. These
professors know the truth, but they're terrified that some irresponsible
idiot is going to come along and prick that bubble. And," he adds with comic
timing, "I am that prick."

Mainstream historians acknowledge the lack of a documented Final Solution
order from Hitler, believing the Fuehrer was too shrewd to leave behind
palpable evidence of his evildoing.
"[That Hitler would not sign a written order] is hardly surprising
considering the monstrosity of the crimes being committed," notes British
historian Alan Bullock.

In May 1988 Irving provided expert testimony on behalf of Canadian Ernst
Zundel, who was charged with violating Canada's "false news" laws by
reprinting a 28-page booklet titled Did Six Million Really Die? Irving
produced a report prepared by Fred Leuchter, an American authority on gas
chambers who performed forensic tests on the gas chamber at Auschwitz.
Leuchter's report found no indication of traces of poisonous gas in the
walls of the gas chamber and alleged the chamber was, consequently, a fake.
Irving testified that there were no grounds to support the existence of a
Nazi plan to exterminate Jews. Upon returning to Europe, Irving published a
special edition of the Leuchter report, writing an introduction in which he
boldly dismissed the traditional version of the Holocaust as a
"well-financed and brilliantly successful postwar publicity campaign."
Publication of the Leuchter report in Europe led to Irving's arrest. By
alleging that the Auschwitz gas chamber was built AFTER the war, he was
convicted of a serious crime in Germany. In May 1992, a Munich court fined
Irving the equivalent of $7,000 for violating a German law against
"defamation of the memory of the dead."

* * * *
Books and pamphlets challenging various aspects of the Holocaust began to
appear shortly after the end of WWII. One of the first revisionist texts was
written by a French concentration-camp survivor named Paul Rassinier.
Rassinier's books, Le Mensonge d'Ulysse [The Lie of Ulysses], published in
1949, and Le Drame des Juifs Europeens [The Drama of the European Jews],
published in 1964, claimed Rassinier had not seen any evidence of the mass
gassings that had come to light after the camps were liberated.

(Dr. Arthur Butz argued that although Jews were persecuted by the Nazis,
they were not specifically targeted for mass extermination).

In the 1970s, Holocaust revisionism saw public debate in the United States.
In 1976, Dr. Arthur Butz, an American professor from Northwestern
University, published The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. Butz argued that
although Jews were persecuted by the Nazis, they were not specifically
targeted for mass extermination. According to Butz, less than half a million
people died in Nazi concentration camps during WWII, and only a fraction of
them were Jews.

Today, the central core of Holocaust revisionism in the U.S. is the
Institute for Historical Review (IHR) in Costa Mesa, California. Founded in
1979 by conspiracy theorist Willis Carto, the IHR largely functions as a
clearing house for a broad range of revisionist propaganda, including such
titles as Dealing in Hate: The Development of Anti-German Propaganda; My
Father, Rudolph Hess; and Auschwitz: Truth or Lie -- An Eyewitness Report.
The IHR also holds annual conferences at which Irving and other revisionists
present their latest findings. The definition of the term HOLOCAUST lies at
the heart of the revisionism controversy. Since WWII, the expression has
been used to describe a systematic Nazi effort -- either originating with
Hitler or approved by him -- to exterminate all of Europe's Jews. Commonly
known as the Final Solution, the plan is thought to have culminated in the
construction and operation of the gas chambers at Nazi concentration camps.

Opponents of Holocaust revisionism -- those who embrace the traditional
version of the war (the American Jewish Committee [AJC] and the
Anti-Defamation League [ADL] in particular) -- consider the fight against
Holocaust revisionism a crusade against a growing army of neo-Nazis around
the world. In a series of extensively researched briefing papers, the AJC
and the ADL argue that Hitler's dream of an Aryan world did not die with
him, but comprises a conspiracy that stretches from the U.S. to Europe and
the Middle East. They refer to their opponents not as Holocaust
revisionists, but Holocaust DENIERS.

"The movement to deny that six million Jews were exterminated by the Nazis
during World War II is a weapon of anti-Semitic extremist groups operating
in the United States and abroad," claims the ADL.

Jewish advocacy groups and their supporters admit that legitimate Holocaust
reappraisal has occurred since the end of WWII. For example, it was widely
assumed after the war that 2.5 million Jews were gassed to death at
Auschwitz alone. Recently Yahuda Bauer, the director of the Division of
Holocaust Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem's Institute of
Contemporary Jewry, announced that the actual number was probably closer to
1.35 million.

Though this revision raises questions about the total number of Jews killed
by the Nazis, the questions raised by Holocaust revisionists are seen as
part of a larger agenda of discrimination.

Irving denies that his views on the Holocaust are anti-Semitic.

"The revisionist scene [incorporates] people from the field of history, like
myself, to people who are at the other end of the spectrum, who find in
revisionism a [means] to vent their anti-Semitism," he explains.

Holocaust revisionism is a common link between many overtly racist and
anti-Semitic groups, such as the California-based White Aryan Resistance,
which produces a cable-access television show called RACE AND REASON.

Some viewers claimed to be offended by an early episode of the program that
opened with canned laughter playing behind WWII film footage of corpses at
Nazi concentration camps.
But support for Holocaust revisionism comes from pro-Semitic sides as well.
A young Jew named David Cole visited Auschwitz in late 1992 and videotaped
an interview with Dr. Franciszek Piper, the curator of the Holocaust museum
at the camp.

In the interview, Piper admitted that the gas chamber shown to tourists was
remodeled by the Soviets after the war. In Cole's view, this statement
confirms Irving's support of the Leuchter Report.

Mainstream historians supporting the traditional version of the Holocaust
point to an abundance of eyewitness accounts and Nazi confessions collected
during numerous war-crimes trials. At the International Military Tribunal,
otherwise known as the Nuremberg Trial, Auschwitz commander Rudolf Hess
testified that he personally arranged the gassing of two million Jews
between June 1941 and the end of 1943.

(Revisionists argue that the Germans, obsessive insect-haters, shipped large
quantities of Zyklon-B to concentration camps during the war to kill lice).
"There's no doubt that the Germans did kill thousands of people,
machine-gunning them into pits," says Irving. "But I don't believe they
planned and installed factories of death with gas chambers."

* * * *
The presence of gas chambers at several Nazi concentration camps is the most
incriminating evidence of Hitler's genocidal intent. Unsuspecting Jews were
tricked into entering the deadly chambers, usually under the pretext that
the rooms were large showers. Once the doors locked behind them, poisonous
gas spewed out of the shower heads, killing great numbers in a matter of
minutes. The bodies were then hauled out, and either burned in adjacent
crematoriums or dumped into pits. According to eyewitness accounts and Nazi
testimony, this process was repeated until millions of Jews had been gassed.

Physical evidence of gas-chamber extermination is hard to come by.
Mainstream historians agree that the Germans installed gas chambers at only
seven camps in Poland -- Auschwitz (and its satellite facility, Birkenau),
Stutthof, Treblinka, Chelmno, Sobibor, Majdanek, and Belzec. All of these
camps were liberated by Soviet troops, and Poland became part of the Soviet
Union after the war. The result was that during the long decades of the Cold
War, the camps and the tons of documents captured by the Russians have been
restricted from Western researchers.

Most of the concentration camps were destroyed by the Germans before they
fell into Soviet hands. Many of the buildings were blown up, including those
that reportedly housed the gas chambers.

Today, the only gas chambers extant are found at Auschwitz, Birkenau and
Majdanek. Basic operating equipment is missing at all of the facilities.
None of the chambers currently have air-tight doors, venting systems for
piping gas or exhaust systems for removing the gas after the victims have
been killed.

Historians agree that the gas chambers used a cyanide-based insecticide
called Zyklon-B. Revisionists argue that the Germans, obsessive
insect-haters, shipped large quantities of Zyklon-B to concentration camps
during the war to kill lice and other insects. Delousing rooms, the doubters
point out, can still be found at many of the camps.

More scientifically minded revisionists argue that Zyklon-B does not vanish
without a trace, but bonds permanently with porous surfaces like bricks and
mortar. According to Rick Gates, a chemist with the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality who is not involved in the revisionist debate,
"Cyanide traces can remain in [such materials] a long time."
Acting on this scientific principle, Fred Leuchter and several companions
traveled to Poland in 1988, where they took samples from the walls and
floors of the gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek. According to
the Leuchter report, only minimal traces of cyanide could be found in the
gas chambers. This shortage of forensic evidence leads Leuchter to conclude
that the rooms could not have been used as gas chambers, and revisionists
take this as proof that the gas chamber story is a hoax.

Jean-Claude Pressac, author of Auschwitz: Design and Fabrication of the Gas
Chambers, refutes Leuchter's theory, alleging that the Germans used enough
Zyklon-B to kill people, but not enough to leave substantial traces.

Pressac, a French pharmacist, uses complex chemical formulas to prove that
traces of cyanide would be found in the delousing rooms, but not in the gas
chambers.

"A hydrocyanic gas concentration of 0.3 grams per cubic meter -- a lethal
dose -- is immediately fatal to a man, while killing lice requires a
concentration of five grams per cubic meter for a period of at least two
hours," claims Pressac. "Maintaining that concentration for six hours will
kill [every insect infesting a person]. The dose used at Birkenau was lethal
40 to 70 times over (12 to 20 grams per cubic inch) -- which infallibly
killed 1,000 persons in less than five minutes."

Without a master plan to eradicate Europe's Jewry, the revisionists argue,
the Nazis were no worse than many other military aggressors in recorded
history. "The killings [perpetrated by the Nazis], the pits and so on, were
no worse than what the Americans did in Vietnam in My Lai," claims Irving,
referring to the March 16, 1968, slaughter by American ground troops of
nearly 300 unarmed and unresisting Vietnam civilians, many of whom were
forced to stand on the edge of a ditch and machine-gunned. "There are
eyewitness descriptions of both. But the idea of setting up killing
factories, with the gas chambers and so on, implies a certain degree of
industrialization and precision that, frankly, I don't think [belongs] in
the record."
Jewish advocacy organizations are not willing to be drawn into a public
debate with Holocaust revisionists. They contend that the Holocaust is not a
matter to be argued and that, for the sake of the memories of countless
families whose relations perished at Nazi hands, the claims of the
revisionists should not be dignified with public responses. "We need not
waste time or reffort answering the deniers' contentions," states Jewish
historian Deborah Lipstadt. "It would be never-ending to respond to
arguments posed by those who freely falsify findings, quote out of context
and simply dismiss reams of testimony. Their commitment is to an ideology,
and their 'findings' are shaped to support it."

The AJC and the ADL routinely publish and distribute the results of lengthy
background checks indicating that revisionists are not merely disinterested
academics, but anti-Semitic political activists.

The ADL has identified former Institute for Historical Review director David
McCalden as the founder of the British National Party, an offshoot of the
neo-Nazi National Front, and reports that revisionist writer Arthur Butz
addressed the 1985 convention of the Nation of Islam, led by notorious
anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan.

Irving has a proposal for settling the controversy: a full enquiry. Says
Irving, "I think it would be most satisfactory if the Jews themselves
investigated and discarded the legend [of the Final Solution], because any
other solution is going to lead to an increase in anti-Semitism. The world
will say, 'Look how they tried to get away with it for 50 years!'"
From Hustler magazine, August 1993:

Revisionists Challenge Extermination Story

THE HOLOCAUST: Let's Hear Both Sides by Mark Weber
Just about everyone has heard that the Germans killed some six million Jews
in Europe during the Second World War. American television, motion pictures,
newspapers and magazines hammer away on this theme. In Washington, DC, an
enormous offical Holocaust Museum is being built.

Scholars Challenge Holocaust Story

During the past decade, though, more and more "Revisionist" historians,
including respected scholars such as Dr. Arthur Butz of Northwestern
University, Prof. Robert Faurisson of the Univeristy of Lyon in France and
best-selling British historian David Irving, have been vigorously
challenging the widely-accepted extermination story. They do not dispute the
fact that large numbers of Jews were deported to concentration camps and
ghettos, or that many Jews died or were killed during the Second World War.
Revisionist scholars have, however, presented considerable evidence to show
that there was no German program to exterminate Europe's Jews and that the
estimate of six million Jewish wartime dead is an irresponsible
exaggeration.

Many Holocaust Claims Abandoned
Revisionists point out that the Holocaust story has changed quite a lot over
the years. Many extermination camps that were once widely accepted have been
quitely dropped in recent years. At one time it was alleged that the Germans
gassed Jews at Dachau, Buchenwald and other concentration camps in Germany
proper. That part of the extermination story proved so untenable that it was
abandoned more than twenty years ago. No serious historian now supports the
once supposedly proven story of "extermination camps" in the territory of
the old German Reich. Even famed "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal acknowledged
in 1975 that "there were no extermination camps on German soil." ('Books &
Bookmen', London, April 1975, p.5). Prominent Holocaust historians now claim
that masses of Jews were gassed at just six camps in what is now Poland:
Auschwitz, Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor, Chelmno and Belzec. However, the
"evidence presented for "gassings" at these six camps is not qualitatively
different than the "evidence" for alleged "gassings" at the camps in Germany
proper. At the great Nuremberg trial of 1945-1946 and during the decades
following the end of the Second World War, Auschwitz (especially
Auschwitz-Birkenau) and Majdanek (Lublin) were generally regarded as the
really important "death camps."

For example, the Allies alleged at Nuremberg that the Germans killed four
million at Auschwitz and another 1.5 million at Majdanek. Today, no
reputable historian accepts these fantastic figures. In addition, more and
more striking evidence has been presented in recent years which simply
cannot be reconciled with the allegations of mass exterminations at these
camps.

For example, detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of
Auschwitz-Birkenau on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the
alleged extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979.
They show no trace of the piles of corpses, smoking chimneys and masses of
Jews awaiting death, all of which have been alleged and would have been
clearly visible if Auschwitz had indeed been an extermination center. We now
also know that the postwar "confessions" of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf
Hess, which is a crucial part of the Holocaust extermination story, was
obtained by torture. (Rupert Butler, "Legions of Death" (England: 1983), pp.
235-237, and R. Faurisson, "Journal of Historical Review", Winter 1986-1987,
pp. 389-403.)

Other Absurd Holocaust Claims
At one time it was also seriously claimed that the Germans exterminated Jews
with electricity and steam, and that they manufactured soap from Jewish
corpses. For example, at Nuremberg the United States charged that the
Germans killed Jews at Treblinka, not in gas chambers, as is now claimed,
but by steaming them to death in "steam chambers" (Nuremberg document
PS-3311 (USA-293). IMT blue series, Vol. 32, pp. 153-158; IMT, Vol 3, pp.
566-568.; NMT green series, Vol. 5, pp. 1133, 1134.) These bizarre stories
have also been quietly abandoned in recent years.

Disease Claimed Many Inmates
The Holocaust extermination story is superficially plausible. Everyone has
seen the horrific photos of dead and dying inmates taken at Bergen-Belsen,
Nordhausen and other concentration camps when they were liberated by British
and American forces in the final weeks of the war in Europe. These people
were unfortunate victims, not of an extermination program, but of disease
and malnutrition brought on by the complete collapse of Germany in the final
months of the war. Indeed, if there had been an extermination program, the
Jews found by Allied forces at the end of the war would have long since been
killed. In the face of the advancing Soviet forces, large numbers of Jews
were evacuated during the final months of the war from eastern camps and
ghettos to the remaining camps in western Germany. These camps quickly
became terribly overcrowded, which severely hampered efforts to prevent the
spread of epidemics. Furthermore, the breakdown of the German transportation
system made it impossible to supply adequate food and medicine to the camps.
Captured German Documents

At the end of the Second World Wa
r, the Allies confiscated a tremendous quantity of German documents dealing
with Germany's wartime Jewish policy, which was sometimes officially
referred to as the "final solution." But not a single German document has
ever been found which even refers to an extermination program. To the
contrary, the documents clearly show that the German "final solution" policy
was one of emigration and deportation, not extermination. Consider, for
example, the confidential German Foreign Office memorandum of August 21,
1942 (Nuremberg document NG-2586-J. NMT green series, Vol. 13, pp. 243-249).
"The present war gives Germany the opportunity and also the duty of solving
the Jewish problem in Europe," the memorandum notes. The policy "to promote
the evacuation of the Jews (from Europe) in closest cooperation with the
agencies of the Reichsfuhrer SS [Himmler] is still in force." The memo noted
that "the number of Jews deported in this way to the East did not suffice to
cover the labor needs." The document quotes German Foreign Minister von
Ribbentrop as saying that "at the end of this war, all Jews would have to
leave Europe. This was an unalterable decision of the Fuhrer [Hitler] and
also the only way to master this problem, as only a global and comprehensive
solution could be applied and individual measures would not help very much."
The memorandum concludes by stating that the "deportations [of Jews to the
East] are a further step on the way to the total solution . . . The
deportation to the [Polish] General Government is a temporary measure. The
Jews will be moved on further to the occupied [Soviet] eastern territories
as soon as the technical conditions for it are given." This unambiguous
document, and others like it, are routinely suppressed or ignored by those
who uphold the Holocaust extermination story.

Unreliable Testimony
Holocaust historians rely heavily on so-called "survivor testimony" to
support the extermination story. But such "evidence" is notoriously
unreliable. As one Jewish historian has pointed out, "most of the memoirs
and reports [of "Holocaust survivors"] are full of preposterous verbosity,
graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation,
dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias,
partisan attacks and apologies." (Samuel Gringauz in "Jewish Social Studies"
(New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65)
Hitler and the "Final Solution"

There is no documentary evidence that Adolf Hitler ever gave an order to
exterminate the Jews, or that he knew of any extermination program. Instead,
the record shows that the German leader wanted the Jews to leave Europe, by
emigration if possible and by deportation if necessary. A document found
after the war in the files of the Reich Ministry of Justice records his
thinking on the Jews. In the spring of 1942, State Secretary Franz
Schlegelberger noted in a memorandum that Hitler's Chief of Chancellery, Dr.
Hans Lammers, had informed him: "The Fuhrer has repeatedly declared to him
[Lammers] that he wants to see the solution of the Jewish problem postponed
until after the war is over." (Nuremberg document PS-4025. D. Irving,
"Goering: A biography" (New York: 1989) p. 349.) And on July 24, 1942,
Hitler emphasized his determination to remove all Jews from Europe after the
war: "The Jews are interested in Europe for economic reasons, but Europe
must reject them, if only out of self-interest, becuase the Jews are
racially tougher. After this war is over, I will rigorously hold to the view
. . . that the Jews will have to leave and emigrate to Madagascar or some
other Jewish national state." (H. Picker, "Hitlers Tischgesprsche im
Fuhrerhauptquartier" (Stuttgart: 1976), p. 456).

"Starving" Jewish prisoners at Stammlag 'Konzentrationslager' Camp.
Himmler's SS and the Camps
Jews were an important part of Germany's wartime labor force, and it was in
Germany's interest to keep them alive. The head of the SS camp
administration office sent a directive dated Dec. 28, 1942, to every
concentration camp, including Auschwitz. It sharply criticized the high
death rate of inmates due to disease, and ordered that "camp physicians must
use all means at their disposal to significantly reduce the death rate in
the various camps." Furthermore, it ordered: "The camp doctors must
supervise more often than in the past the nutrition of the prisoners and, in
cooperation with the administration, submit improvement recommendations to
the camp commandants. . . The camp doctors are to see to it that the working
conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as possible."
Finally, the directive stressed that "The Reichsfuhrer SS [Heinrich Himmler]
has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced." (Nuremberg
document PS-2171, Annex 2; NC&A red series, Vol. 4, pp. 833-834). The head
of the SS department that supervised the concentration camps, Richard
Glucks, sent a circular letter to each camp commandant dated January 20,
1943. In it he ordered: "As I have already pointed out, every means must be
used to lower the death rate in the camp." (Nuremberg document NO-1523; NMT
green series, Vol. 5, pp. 372-373)
Six Million?

There is no real evidence for the incessantly repeated claim that the German
exterminated six million Jews. It is clear, though, that millions of Jews
"survived" German rule during the Second World War, including many who were
interned in Auschwitz and other so-called "extermination camps." This fact
alone should raise serious doubts about the extermination story. A leading
newspaper of neutral Switzerland, the daily "Baseler Nachrichten", carefully
estimated in June 1946 that no more than 1.5 million European Jews could
have perished under German rule during the war ("Baseler Nachrichten", June
13, 1946, p.2).

One-Sided "Holocaustomania"
Even after more than forty years, the stream of Holocaust films and books
shows no sign of diminishing. This relentless media campaign, which Jewish
historian Alfred Lilienthal calls "Holocaustomania," portrays the fate of
the Jews during the Second World War as the central event of history. There
is no end to the heavy-handed motion pictures, the simplistic television
specials, the vindictive hunt for "Nazi-war criminals," the one-sided
"educational courses," and the self-righteous appearances by politicans and
celebrities at Holocaust "memorial services." Britain's chief rabbi,
Immanuel Jakobovits, has accurately described the Holocaust campaign as "an
entire industry, with handsome profits for writers, researchers,
film-makers, monument builders, museum planners and even politicians." He
added that some rabbis and theologians are "partners in this big business."
(H. Shapiro, "Jakobovits," 'Jerusalem Post' (Israel), Nov. 26, 1987, p.1)
Non-Jewish victims just don't merit the same concern. For example, there are
no American memorials, "study centers," or annual observances for Stalin's
victims, who vastly outnumber Hitler's.

Who Benefits?
The perpetual Holocaust media blitz is routinely used to justify enormous
American support for Israel and to excuse otherwise inexcusable Israeli
policies, even when they conflict with American interests. The sophisticated
and well-financed Holocaust media campaign is crucially important to the
intersts of Israel, which owes its existence to massive annual subsidies
from American taxpayers. As Prof. W. D. Rubinstein of Australia has candidly
acknowledged: "If the Holocaust can be shown to be a 'Zionist myth,' the
strongest of all weapons in Israel's propaganda armory collapses."
("Quadrant" (Australia), Sept. 1979, p.27).

Jewish history teacher Paula Hyman of Columbia University has observed:
"With regard to Israel, the Holocuast may be used to forestall political
criticism and suppress debate; it reinforces the sense of Jews as an
eternally beleaguered people who can rely for their defense only upon
themselves. The invocation of the suffering endured by the Jews under the
Nazis often takes the place of rational argument, and is expected to
convince doubters of the legitimacy of current Israeli government policy."
('New York Times Magazine', Sept. 14, 1980, p. 79). One major reason that
the Holocuast story has proven so durable is that the government of the
major powers also have a vested interest in maintaining it. The victorious
powers of the Second World War -- the United States, the Soviet Union and
Britian -- have a stake in portraying the defeated Hitler regime as
negatively as possible. The more evil and satanic the Hitler regime appears,
the more noble and justified seems the Allied cause. For many Jews, the
Holocaust has become both a flourishing buisness and a kind of new religion,
as noted Jewish author and newspaper publisher Jacobo Timerman points out in
his book, 'The Longest War.' He reports that many Israelis, using the word
Shoah, which is Hebrew for Holocaust, joke that "There's no business like
Shoah business." ('The Longest War', (New York: Vintage, 1982), p. 15). The
Holocaust media campaign portrays Jews as totally innocent victims, and
non-Jews as mortally retarded and unreliable beings who can easily turn into
murderous Nazis under the right circumstances. This self-serving but
distorted portrayal greatly strengthens Jewish group solidarity and
self-awareness. A key lesson of the Holocaust story for Jews is that
non-Jews are never completely trustworthy. If a people as cultured and as
educated as the Germans could turn against the Jews, so the thinking goes,
than surely no non-Jewish nation can ever be completely trusted. The
Holocaust message is thus one of contempt for humanity.

Holocaust Hatemongering
The Holocaust story is sometimes ued to promote hatred and hostility,
particularly against the German people as a whole, eastern Europeans and the
leadership of the Roman Catholic church. The well-known Jewish writer, Elie
Wiesel, is a former Auschwitz inmate who served as chairman of the offical
U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council. He recieved the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize.
This dedicated Zionist wrote in his book, 'Legends of Our Time': "Every Jew,
somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate -- healthy, virile
hate -- for what the German personifies and for what persists in the
German." ('Legends of Our Time' (New York: Schocken Books, 1982) chap. 12,
p. 142).

Let Both Sides Be Heard
For several years now, the Holocaust story has been the subject of
legitimate controversy in Europe. It was debated for several hours on Swiss
television and over French national radio. The respected Italian historical
journal "Storia Illustrata" has given extensive coverage to both sides of
this issue. Here in America, though, powerful organizations have so far
prevented any real public exchange of views on this issue. Many thoughtful
Americans are having growing doubts about at least some of the more
sensational Holocaust claims, but all the public ever sees and hears is the
orthodox view of the extermination story. That's not right. Americans have
the right to judge this important issue for themselves.

In summation:
The Holocaust extermination story is breaking down as suppressed evidence
becomes better known, and as more people become aware of the facts about
what is certainly the most hyped and politicized chapter of modern history.
Artificially maintaining the hatreds and passions of the past prevents
genuine reconciliation and lasting peace. Revisionism promotes histiorical
awareness and international understanding. That's why the work of the
Institute for Historical Review is so important and deserves your support.

About the Author:
Mark Weber is editor of the 'IHR Newsletter' and associate editor of the
'Journal of Historical Review', both published by the Institute for
Historical Review. He studied history at the University of Illinois
(Chicago), the University of Munich, Portland state University, and Indiana
University (M.A., 1977). For five days in March 1988, he testified as a
recognized expert witness on the "Final Solution" and the Holocaust issue in
a Toronto District Court case. He is the aurthor of many published articles,
reviews and essays on various aspects of modern European history.
Institute for Historical Review P.O.Box 2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659

66 Questions on the Holocaust

1. What proof exists that the Nazis practiced genocide or deliberately
killed six million. Jews?
2. What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis?
3. Did Simon Wiesenthal once state in writing that "there were no
extermination camps on German soil?
4. If Dachau was in Germany and even Simon Wiesenthal says that it was not
an extermination camp, why do thousands of veterans in America say that it
was an extermination camp?
5. Auschwitz was in Poland, not Germany. Is there any proof that gas
chambers for the purpose of killing human beings existed at or in Auschwitz?
6. If Auschwitz wasn't a "death camp," what was it's true purpose?
7. Who set up the first concentration camps, and where and when?
8. How did German concentration camps differ from America relocation camps
which interned Japanese-German-and Italian-Americans during W.W.II?
9. Why did the German intern Jews in concentration camps?
10. What extensive measure did world Jewry undertake against Germany as
early as 1933?
11. Did the Jews of the world "declare war on Germany?"
12. Was this before or after the rumors of the "death camps" began?
13. What nation is credited with being the first to practice mass civilian
bombing?
14. How many gas chambers to kill people were there at Auschwitz?
15. How many Jews were in areas that came to be controlled by the Germans
before the war?
16. If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis, what happened
to them?
17. How many Jews fled to deep within the Soviet Union?
18. How many Jews emigrated prior to the war, thus being outside of German
reach?
19. If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did the commandant,
Rudolf Hoess, confess that it was?
20. Is there any evidence that it was American, British, French, and Soviet
policy to torture German prisoners in order to exact confessions before the
trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere?
21. How does the "Holocaust" story benefit the Jews today?
22. How does it benefit the State of Israel?
23. How does it benefit many Christian clergy?
24. How does it benefit the Communists?
25. How does it benefit Britain?
26. Is there any evidence that Hitler knew of a mass extermination of Jews?
27. What kind of gas was used by the Nazis in concentration camps?
28. For what purpose was, and is, this gas manufactured?
29. Why did they use this instead of a gas more suitable for mass
extermination?
30. How long does it take to ventilate fully an area fumigated by Zyklon-B?
31. Auschwitz commandant Hoess said that his men would enter the gas chamber
ten minutes after the Jews had died and remove them. How do you explain
this?
32. Hoess said in his confession that his men would smoke cigarettes as they
pulled the dead Jews out of the gas chambers ten minutes after gassing.
Isn't Zyklon-B explosive?
33. What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used to exterminate
Jews?
34. How could such a mass program have been kept secret from Jews who were
scheduled for extermination?
35. If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store for them, why did
they go to their deaths without fight or protest?
36. About how many Jews died in the concentration camps?
37. How did they die?
38. What is typhus?
39. What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews died during this
awesome period?
40. Many Jewish survivors of the "death camps" say they saw bodies being
piled up in pits and burned. How much gasoline would have to be used to
perform this?
41. Can bodies be burned in pits?
42. "Holocaust" authors claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in
about 10 minutes. How long does it take to incinerate one body according to
professional cremator operators?
43. Why did the concentration camps have crematory ovens?
44. Given a 100 (to the 6th power) duty cycle of all the crematoria in all
the camps in German-controlled territory, what is the maximum number of
corpses it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire period
such cremators were operating?
45. Can a crematory oven be operated 100 (to the 6th power) of the time?
46. How much ash is left from a cremated corpse?
47. If six million people had been incinerated by the Nazis, what happened
to the ashes?
48. Do Allied wartime photos of Auschwitz (during the period when the "gas
chambers" and crematoria were supposed to be in full operation) reveal gas
chambers?
49. What was the main provision of the German "Nuremberg laws" of 1935?
50. Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws?
51. What did the International Red Cross have to report with regard to the
"Holocaust" question?
52. What was the role of the Vatican during the time the six million Jews
were alleged to have been exterminated?
53. What evidence is there that Hitler knew of the ongoing Jewish
extermination?
54. Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate?
55. What caused Anne Frank's death just several weeks before the end of the
war?
56. Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine?
57. What about the numerous photographs and footage taken in the German
concentration camps showing piles of emaciated corpses? Are these faked?
58. Who originated the term "genocide"?
59. Were films such as 'Holocaust' and 'The Winds of War' documentary films?
60. About how many books have been published which refute some aspect of the
standard claims made about the "Holocaust"?
61. What happened when a historical institute offered $50,000 to anyone who
could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?
62. What about the claim that those who question the "Holocaust" are
anti-Semitic or Neo-Nazi?
63. What has happened to the historians who have questioned the "Holocaust"
material?
64. Has the Institute for Historical Review suffered any retaliation for its
efforts to uphold the right of freedom of speech and academic freedom?
65. Why is there so little publicity for your point of view?
66. Where can I get more information about the "other side" of the
"Holocaust" story as well as facts concerning other areas of W.W.II
Historical Revisionism?

[Tim Miller]

B.H. Cramer wrote:
>
>
>
> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>
> Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced
> that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.
>
> Fred A. Leuchter is America's leading specialist on the design and
> fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers.

No, he isn't. He's a failed history major.

[Patrick Keenan]

"Tim Miller" <replyton...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:gsvdol$v3m$1...@news.motzarella.org...

Who is in reality a detected and failed con man, whose main business was
running a shakedown scam targeting US prisons.

"Mr. Cramer" knows perfectly well that Mr. Leuchter is not a "leading
specialist" in anything, and that the claims he repeats about Leuchter's
qualifications are falsehoods.

-pk

[Joe Bruno]

> so-called "evidence" ...
>
> read more »

Major Evidence of the Holocaust

Nizkor Website

http://www.nizkor.org/

Testimony of Auschwitz Commandant Hoess

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/hoesstest....

Statement by the American Historical Association:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/6bc3bf4f1df8fc08

The Avalon Project-Transcripts of the Nuremberg Trials
None of the defendants ever denied the exterminations

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/imt.htm#proc

Where Does the Six Million Number Come From

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/73663db2f3555bfe

NOTE: The 4 million number for Auschwitz was a estimate, based on
faulty assumptions, compiled by Soviet forensic scientists in a hurry
for Stalin. It is not included in the six million computation.

The Holocaust History Project

http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/body-disposal/

The Postwar SS escape Attempts:Behavioral Evidence of Guilt
It was notable that none of the German Soldiers, Sailors or Airman
Tried to Escape
The secret organization ODESSA who helped only SS men escape Justice;

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/cb5bcd0558fd5ebd

Holocaust Denial on Trial at Emory University:

http://www.hdot.org/

Adolf Eichmann in His Own Words:He never denied the exterminations.
His sole defense was
that he was just following Orders:

http://remember.org/eichmann/ownwords.htm

[Boed...@isp.com]

On Apr 25, 11:58 am, "Patrick Keenan" <t...@dev.null> wrote:
> "Tim Miller" <replytonewsgr...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message

>
> news:gsvdol$v3m$1...@news.motzarella.org...
>
> > B.H. Cramer wrote:
>
> >> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>
> >> Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced
> >> that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.
>
> >> Fred A. Leuchter is America's leading specialist on the design and
> >> fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers.
>
> > No, he isn't. He's a failed history major.
>
> Who is in reality a detected and failed con man, whose main business was
> running a shakedown scam targeting US prisons.

I wonder if Madoff knows him. These conmen try to keep in touch with
each
other you know.

>
> "Mr. Cramer" knows perfectly well that Mr. Leuchter is not a "leading
> specialist" in anything, and that the claims he repeats about Leuchter's
> qualifications are falsehoods.

Are you absolutely *sure* that you name is "Keenan". Have you ever
had a talk with your mother about the possibility that she might have
got your bloodlines mixed up? You're the strangest "Keenan:" I've ever
seen. Hey, you're not on their payroll are you ala the cretin
OyVey McVey!!
>
> -pk

[Tim Miller]

That's really funny coming from a transvestite that delights
in calling himself "girlie names"!

ROFLMAO!

[B.H. Cramer]

"Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null> wrote in message
news:0qWdnb7zXK_hw27U...@supernews.com...

> "Tim Miller" <replyton...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:gsvdol$v3m$1...@news.motzarella.org...
>> B.H. Cramer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>>>
>>> Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be
>>> convinced
>>> that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.
>>>
>>> Fred A. Leuchter is America's leading specialist on the design and
>>> fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers.
>>
>> No, he isn't. He's a failed history major.
>
> Who is in reality a detected and failed con man, whose main business was
> running a shakedown scam targeting US prisons.

Prove that, keenan kunt.

>
> "Mr. Cramer" knows perfectly well that Mr. Leuchter is not a "leading
> specialist" in anything, and that the claims he repeats about Leuchter's
> qualifications are falsehoods.

He most certainly was the leading specialist in the field of outing the
yids' bullshit about gas chambers at Auschwitz, kunt. Why else would the
yids have been so damned determined to destroy him.

You are going to come unstuck with your lies one day, keenan kunt. I hope
I'm around to witness it.

>
> -pk
>
>

[B.H. Cramer]

"Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null> wrote in message
news:0qWdnb7zXK_hw27U...@supernews.com...

> "Tim Miller" <replyton...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:gsvdol$v3m$1...@news.motzarella.org...
>> B.H. Cramer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>>>
>>> Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be
>>> convinced
>>> that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.
>>>
>>> Fred A. Leuchter is America's leading specialist on the design and
>>> fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers.
>>
>> No, he isn't. He's a failed history major.
>
> Who is in reality a detected and failed con man, whose main business was
> running a shakedown scam targeting US prisons.

And here's keenan again - ignoring the context of the message and seeking a
single issue he can comment on to deflect notice from the uncomfortable.

You are a lying, deceitful piece of shit, keenan.

[B.H. Cramer]

"Joe Bruno" <jbr...@indystart.com> wrote in message
news:a8ca5525-786f-469b...@y33g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

None there, b'luto. Those are all yid inspired or owned websites.

[Boed...@isp.com]

On Apr 25, 1:24 pm, Tim Miller <replytonewsgr...@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

And even more drivel from some daft wannabe. If you have any proof
that I am a
"transvestite" please post it you silly little fairy.

"Girlie names". My name is "Marsha". It is not a girlie name, it is
the name
given to me at my Christening. Oops, I should have written "Xening",
you know how
touchy these jews and their wannabe imbecilic bootlickers about the
name of "Christ". Oops did it again.

Where on earth do these morons come up with their garbage?

>
> ROFLMAO!-

Careful. Remember people who do that sort of thing usually end up in
some loony bin
being fed through a straw because their arms are in a straitjacket.

"Miller"? Any relation to that old commie Arthur Miller who wa
sblacklisted in the
1950's.

So many hebes, so many commies.

Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[Boed...@isp.com]

On Apr 25, 4:32 pm, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
> "Patrick Keenan" <t...@dev.null> wrote in message
>
> news:0qWdnb7zXK_hw27U...@supernews.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Tim Miller" <replytonewsgr...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message

> >news:gsvdol$v3m$1...@news.motzarella.org...
> >> B.H. Cramer wrote:
>
> >>> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>
> >>> Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be
> >>> convinced
> >>> that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.
>
> >>> Fred A. Leuchter is America's leading specialist on the design and
> >>> fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers.
>
> >> No, he isn't. He's a failed history major.
>
> > Who is in reality a detected and failed con man, whose main business was
> > running a shakedown scam targeting US prisons.
>
> And here's keenan again - ignoring the context of the message and seeking a
> single issue he can comment on to deflect notice from the uncomfortable.
>
> You are a lying, deceitful piece of shit, keenan.

He's been spending too much time around those abortion mills and when
you do that, you
are bound to come into contact with the jew. I recall one of them
who got
offed shortly after returning from the synagogue. His name was Sapien
and he made
his money in the abortion racket. I remember thinking at the time
that it was ironic
that some supposedly God fearing jew would make his shekels by the
killing of the
unborn and get offed after returning from some House of Worship.

[B.H. Cramer]

<Boed...@isp.com> wrote in message
news:8f719619-18a3-4291...@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

It seems hebes are born with an afinity for greed, theft, dishonesty,
extortion, political manipulation, brutality and general nastiness and a
complete disregard for honest, decency, fairness, humanity or humility.

They must acquire it genetically along with the plethora of diseases they
are genetically predisposed to.

[I'll Always Be 26/04/09]

In article
<8f719619-18a3-4291-bc4b-05de7ce41fe9@w3
1g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com>
wrote:

Your proof of this?

[I'll Always Be 26/04/09]

In article
<e53f3fff-e699-4c9a-ab61-cec8a2664f9f@w3

1g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com>
wrote:

> On Apr 25, 11:58 am, "Patrick Keenan" <t...@dev.null> wrote:

> > "Tim Miller" <replytonewsgr...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> >
> > news:gsvdol$v3m$1...@news.motzarella.org...
> >
> > > B.H. Cramer wrote:
> >
> > >> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
> >
> > >> Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced
> > >> that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.
> >
> > >> Fred A. Leuchter is America's leading specialist on the design and
> > >> fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers.
> >
> > > No, he isn't. He's a failed history major.
> >
> > Who is in reality a detected and failed con man, whose main business was
> > running a shakedown scam targeting US prisons.
>
> I wonder if Madoff knows him. These conmen try to keep in touch with
> each other you know.

So you admit that you are in touch with
freddie leuchter?

> >
> > "Mr. Cramer" knows perfectly well that Mr. Leuchter is not a "leading
> > specialist" in anything, and that the claims he repeats about Leuchter's
> > qualifications are falsehoods.
>
> Are you absolutely *sure* that you name is "Keenan". Have you ever
> had a talk with your mother about the possibility that she might have
> got your bloodlines mixed up? You're the strangest "Keenan:" I've ever
> seen.

Just how many have you seen? And how
much did they pay you

[I'll Always Be 26/04/09]

In article
<888bd627-3d37-441b-80cb-1cdb2f79478f@y3
4g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
"Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com>
wrote:

ala knoll: prove it isn't true.

>
> "Girlie names". My name is "Marsha".
> It is not a girlie name, it is the
> name given to me at my Christening.
> Oops, I should have written "Xening",

You belong to the cult of Xena?

> you know how touchy these jews and
> their wannabe imbecilic bootlickers
> about the name of "Christ". Oops did
> it again.

Why would they care? After all he was
Jewish...oops I guess that means he was
a thief and usurer

>
> Where on earth do these morons come
> up with their garbage?

They just repost snippets of your "best
of"

[Michael Ejercito]

On Apr 25, 9:26 am, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:

> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?

No, it is historical fact.

>
> Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced
> that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.

Any intelligent, open-minded person knows that you are spewing your
usual line of National Socialist bullshit.

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.

Michael

[RJ11]

In article <yL2dnRoatN7NVW7U...@giganews.com>,
B.H. Cramer <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:

(hysterical rants given the snip)

Do calm down, "Cramer". Soon, your little brother will arrive
with the new shipment, and everything will be fine.

"my younger Brother got me absolutely stoned on magic mushrooms.
I spent three days sitting in the corner of the tent waiting to come
down." -- the neo-Nazi "Ben Cramer" reflects on his usage of
hallucinatory drugs. Source:
Message-ID: <1125123267.5e5d281ad88798917af26011bcb01dc0@teranews>

There you go. That's a good lad.

RJ.

[Boed...@isp.com]

On Apr 25, 7:34 pm, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
> <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote in message

They appear to be born with an unconrollable desire to destroy the
white race
and the religion of the white race. You may not believe in a
Creator, but the events
of The Garden of Eden make more sense as the centuries go by. The
serpent (Satan)
"beguiled" (seduced) Eve and Adam and his descendents have been
suffering ever
since. If the race that calls itself "jew" are descended from the
result of that seduction,
it would explain many things, especially their Bolshevism and the
deaths of millions
of Christians.

"You do the work of your father the devil".
Christ

"The white race is the cancer of humanity".
Bolshie jewess Susan Sontag, who died of cancer.

> They must acquire it genetically along with the plethora of diseases they
> are genetically predisposed to.

Everything is genetic. They are born communists and they have no
morality or shame
when it comes to such things as scamming and lying.

- Hide quoted text -

[NefeshBarYochai]

You are a troll.

[I'll Always Be 26/04/09]

In article
<ff2843f6-f2be-4403-8a3c-dd15e81cb0a0@t3
6g2000prt.googlegroups.com>,
"Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com>
wrote:

The white race was born with the desire
to enslave others, even whites...and
they have ALWAYS justified this with
their bible.

You may not believe in a
> Creator, but the events of The
> Garden of Eden make more sense as the
> centuries go by. The serpent (Satan)
> "beguiled" (seduced) Eve and Adam
> and his descendents have been
> suffering ever since.

Because, Eve being white was inept and
incompetent.

> If the race
> that calls itself "jew" are descended
> from the result of that seduction, it
> would explain many things, especially
> their Bolshevism and the deaths of
> millions of Christians.

For that we only have to look at your
christ. He was by your own admission a
thief, murderer and usurer.

>
> "You do the work of your father the
> devil". Christ

You xians have such a strange god.
Omniscient and Omnipotent yet incapable
of destroying the Devil.

>
> "The white race is the cancer of
> humanity". Bolshie jewess Susan
> Sontag, who died of cancer.

With examples like you, where is she
wrong?

>
>
> > They must acquire it genetically along with the plethora of diseases they
> > are genetically predisposed to.
>
> Everything is genetic.

Even the genetic bloodlust that xians
have and their need to enslave others.

> They are born communists and they have no
> morality or shame when it comes to such things as scamming and lying.

You have a point...there are literally
millions of dead natives in countries
across the globe that have been "saved"
by the xians.

[Boed...@isp.com]

> You are a troll.-

Says the imbecile Neshfee who calls everyone who tells the truth
"trolls".

Either take your pills or get back to the loony bin. Who's the idiot
who let you out
anyway!!

[I'll Always Be 26/04/09]

In article
<d27819ab-a450-4818-b8f6-360cd5f4303f@y6
g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com>
wrote:

That's about the 1000 time you've posted
that. Have you nothing moreup to date
to bore us with?

[alittlesanity]

In article <d27819ab-a450-4818...@y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Boed...@isp.com <Boed...@isp.com> wrote:

> Either take your pills

Jesus Christ. Not that "take your pills" again, you
ancient, rotting, smelly, disgusting nazi sow? It's
REALLY boring.

Do you realize that no matter how many miles of Nazi
dick you eagerly insert into your toothless mouth,
these guys hate you more than they hate the Jews? You
were in the RAF, which they consider as an organization
which murdered numerous German civilians. Believe me,
they hate you. Really, really, really hate you.

[Michael Ejercito]

On Apr 25, 4:45 pm, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
> On Apr 25, 4:32 pm, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Patrick Keenan" <t...@dev.null> wrote in message
>
> >news:0qWdnb7zXK_hw27U...@supernews.com...
>
> > > "Tim Miller" <replytonewsgr...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> > >news:gsvdol$v3m$1...@news.motzarella.org...
> > >> B.H. Cramer wrote:
>
> > >>> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>
> > >>> Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be
> > >>> convinced
> > >>> that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.
>
> > >>> Fred A. Leuchter is America's leading specialist on the design and
> > >>> fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers.
>
> > >> No, he isn't. He's a failed history major.
>
> > > Who is in reality a detected and failed con man, whose main business was
> > > running a shakedown scam targeting US prisons.
>
> > And here's keenan again - ignoring the context of the message and seeking a
> > single issue he can comment on to deflect notice from the uncomfortable.
>
> > You are a lying, deceitful piece of shit, keenan.
>
> He's been spending too much time around those abortion mills and when
> you do that, you
>  are bound to come into contact with the jew.

Which Jew would that be?

Michael

[Michael Ejercito]

On Apr 25, 7:34 pm, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
> <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote in message

>
> news:8f719619-18a3-4291...@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 25, 4:32 pm, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Patrick Keenan" <t...@dev.null> wrote in message
>
> >news:0qWdnb7zXK_hw27U...@supernews.com...
>
> > > "Tim Miller" <replytonewsgr...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> > >news:gsvdol$v3m$1...@news.motzarella.org...

> > >> No, he isn't. He's a failed history major.
>
> > > Who is in reality a detected and failed con man, whose main business was
> > > running a shakedown scam targeting US prisons.
>
> > And here's keenan again - ignoring the context of the message and seeking
> > a
> > single issue he can comment on to deflect notice from the uncomfortable.
>
> > You are a lying, deceitful piece of shit, keenan.
> >He's been spending too much time around those abortion mills and when
> >you do that, you
> > are bound to come into contact with the jew.  I recall one of them
> >who got
> >offed shortly after returning from the synagogue. His name was Sapien
> >and he made
> >his money in the abortion  racket. I remember thinking at the time
> >that it was ironic
> >that some supposedly God fearing jew would make his shekels by the
> >killing of the
> >unborn and get offed after returning from some House of Worship.
>
> It seems hebes are born with an afinity for greed, theft, dishonesty,
> extortion, political manipulation, brutality and general nastiness and a
> complete disregard for honest, decency, fairness, humanity or humility.
>

Apparently they have a lot in common with you.

Michael

[Michael Ejercito]

On Apr 26, 2:25 pm, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
> On Apr 25, 7:34 pm, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:8f719619-18a3-4291...@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> > On Apr 25, 4:32 pm, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>
> > > "Patrick Keenan" <t...@dev.null> wrote in message
>
> > >news:0qWdnb7zXK_hw27U...@supernews.com...
>

Hitler and Stalin killed more white people than any Jew.

[Anonymous Remailer]

You must be desperate. It wasn't the RAF pilots who committed the crimes,
it was their leaders such as Churchill and Harris.

[alittlesanity]

In article <1ccae81a6ba24f29...@awxcnx.de>,
Anonymous Remailer <m...@awxcnx.de> wrote:

>>> Either take your pills

Nazis don't make such distinctions. For example, Hans-Peter Skaliks
(posting here as "ebersdorf") still hates Poles and Czechs for the
imaginary "crimes" their nations have supposedly inflicted upon Germany
more than 60 years ago:

"In my opinion, the Poles got their pound of flesh in 1945, and no
Pole should ever be allowed to cross into Germany and no Polish goods
or commerce should be able to go through Germany. The same goes for
the Czechs. Both populations should be allowed to live in Uganda-like
poverty and anguish from now until the end of the world. Personally,
if I notice that something comes from either place, it goes back onto
the store shelf. When I encounter a Pole or Czech it takes huge
self-control to avoid the urge to spit in their face." --Posted
by Hans-Peter Skaliks (under the nym "eber...@gmail.com"),
Message-ID: <1b1tt41o8jcvi3bi2...@4ax.com>.

[fla...@verizon.net]

On 27-Apr-2009, a little sanity, please <rati...@nospam.com> wrote:

> In article
> <d27819ab-a450-4818...@y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> Boed...@isp.com <Boed...@isp.com> wrote:
>
> > Either take your pills
>
> Jesus Christ. Not that "take your pills" again, you
> ancient, rotting, smelly, disgusting nazi sow? It's
> REALLY boring.
>

No, it's REALLY **TELLING**.
After all, what do bigots do almost as much as
they lie in general? They project.

> Do you realize that no matter how many miles of Nazi
> dick you eagerly insert into your toothless mouth,
> these guys hate you more than they hate the Jews? You
> were in the RAF, which they consider as an organization
> which murdered numerous German civilians. Believe me,
> they hate you. Really, really, really hate you.

Especially if she's really a woman.
They hate women, too.

Susan

[george]

On Apr 28, 7:57 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

> Especially if she's really a woman.
> They hate women, too.

especially self confident women who out them.

[Michael Ejercito]

On Apr 27, 12:57 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> On 27-Apr-2009, a little sanity,  please <ratio...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <d27819ab-a450-4818-b8f6-360cd5f43...@y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,

> > Boedi...@isp.com <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
>
> > > Either take your pills
>
> > Jesus Christ.  Not that "take your pills" again,  you
> > ancient,  rotting,  smelly,  disgusting nazi sow?  It's
> > REALLY boring.
>
> No, it's REALLY **TELLING**.
> After all, what do bigots do almost as much as
> they lie in general? They project.
>
> > Do you realize that no matter how many miles of Nazi
> > dick you eagerly insert into your toothless mouth,
> > these guys hate you more than they hate the Jews?  You
> > were in the RAF,  which they consider as an organization
> > which murdered numerous German civilians.  Believe me,
> > they hate you.  Really,  really,  really hate you.
>
> Especially if she's really a woman.
> They hate women, too.
>
> Susan

That is true.

Ben often calls people cunts.

Michael

[Boed...@isp.com]

You seem to forget 30 million white Russians you silly little idiot.

>
>    You are a Nazi.
>
>    As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a

Oh no, not again.

Snip. You are a pathetic little fool. For Christ's sake get some
mental help
before they take you ack to the loony bin.

>
>    Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
> Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
> children as sexual partners.

NURSE!! Quick the nedle, he's on about sex with children again.

You can not interact with competent
> adults in a consensually sexual
> way.

And again with the sex.

 You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
> it a prepubescent
> boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.

And again with the sex with boys and patients in mental hospitals.

>
>    That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
> honest about it.

And what *you* are is a mental case who needs to find himself some jew
shrink
before you start running amok and doing someone an injury. What's
wrong with you
anyway?
>
>  Michael- Hide quoted text -

[Boed...@isp.com]

On Apr 27, 12:57 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> On 27-Apr-2009, a little sanity,  please <ratio...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <d27819ab-a450-4818-b8f6-360cd5f43...@y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,

> > Boedi...@isp.com <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
>
> > > Either take your pills
>
> > Jesus Christ.  Not that "take your pills" again,  you
> > ancient,  rotting,  smelly,  disgusting nazi sow?  It's
> > REALLY boring.

jew vulgarity at its best.

>
> No, it's REALLY **TELLING**.
> After all, what do bigots do almost as much as
> they lie in general? They project.

"Project". That's 895.341

>
> > Do you realize that no matter how many miles of Nazi
> > dick you eagerly insert into your toothless mouth,
> > these guys hate you more than they hate the Jews?  You
> > were in the RAF,

WRAF.

 which they consider as an organization
> > which murdered numerous German civilians.

Who is *they", the hebes?

 Believe me,
> > they hate you.  Really,  really,  really hate you.

It will be a cold day in hell when I start worrying about morons who
really, really,
really hate me. Most of the wannabe imbeciles who post here are all
a ham
sandwich short of a picnic.

>
> Especially if she's really a woman.
> They hate women, too.

Who hates women you silly little boghopper? You're not all there
are you.
>
> Susan

[Boed...@isp.com]

"Out them"? Are you referring to all those jew lesbos who go to
"Right to LIfe" meeting
and throw condoms at the speaker?

How about your jew wife, is she one of those self-confident women? You
certainly
don't appear to be the man of *your* home since you have to go along
with everything
that favours the jew race. Did you keep tour own religon when you
married out or did you
turn race-traitor like all those daft Hollyvood starlets who married
jews and deserted
their own people.

[I'll Always Be 28/04/09]

In article
<6fd38f38-c8df-4b21-856b-801e5d6332f6@d3
8g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
"Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com>
wrote:

> On Apr 27, 2:13�pm, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
> > On Apr 28, 7:57�am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> >
> > > Especially if she's really a woman.
> > > They hate women, too.
> >
> > especially self confident women who out them.
>
> "Out them"? Are you referring to
> all those jew lesbos who go to "Right
> to LIfe" meeting and throw condoms at the speaker?

No, she's talking about outing idiots
and hypocrites...but once again your
mind easily reverts to sexual innuendo.

>
> How about your jew wife, is she one
> of those self-confident women? You
> certainly don't appear to be the man
> of *your* home since you have to go
> along with everything that favours
> the jew race.

And you don't do everything your pope
requires of you?

Did you keep tour own
> religon when you married out or did
> you turn race-traitor like all those
> daft Hollyvood starlets who married
> jews and deserted their own people.

Which reminds me, where is that list of
Hungarian Jews who live in Beverly Hills?

[I'll Always Be 28/04/09]

In article
<803c348e-8606-43ed-8fa4-89420b5fc346@a5
g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
"Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com>
wrote:

> On Apr 27, 12:57�pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > On 27-Apr-2009, a little sanity, �please <ratio...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article
> > > <d27819ab-a450-4818-b8f6-360cd5f43...@y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> > > Boedi...@isp.com <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Either take your pills
> >
> > > Jesus Christ. �Not that "take your pills" again, �you
> > > ancient, �rotting, �smelly, �disgusting nazi sow? �It's
> > > REALLY boring.
>
> jew vulgarity at its best.
> >
> > No, it's REALLY **TELLING**.
> > After all, what do bigots do almost as much as
> > they lie in general? They project.
>
> "Project". That's 895.341
> >
> > > Do you realize that no matter how many miles of Nazi
> > > dick you eagerly insert into your toothless mouth,
> > > these guys hate you more than they hate the Jews? �You
> > > were in the RAF,
>
> WRAF.
>
> �which they consider as an organization
> > > which murdered numerous German civilians.
>
> Who is *they", the hebes?

That you have trouble following a simple
thought is in no way our problem.

>
> �Believe me,

> > > they hate you. �Really, �really, �really hate you.
>
> It will be a cold day in hell when
> I start worrying about morons who
> really, really, really hate me.
> Most of the wannabe imbeciles who
> post here are all a ham sandwich
> short of a picnic.

That's about the 1000 time you've posted

that. Have you nothing moreup to date
to bore us with?

> >

> > Especially if she's really a woman.
> > They hate women, too.
>
> Who hates women you silly little
> boghopper? You're not all there
> are you.

That you have trouble following a simple
thought is in no way our problem.

> >
> > Susan

[I'll Always Be 28/04/09]

In article
<375db534-7740-47fe-9667-0e89f3e9e008@a5

g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
"Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com>
wrote:

> On Apr 27, 8:32�am, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Where are the bodies? Where is the
forensic proof? Cramer wants to know.

> >
> > � �You are a Nazi.

> >
> > � �As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a
>
> Oh no, not again.

That's about the 1000 time you've posted

that. Have you nothing moreup to date
to bore us with?

>

> Snip. You are a pathetic little fool. For Christ's sake get some
> mental help before they take you ack to the loony bin.

That's about the 1000 time you've posted

that. Have you nothing moreup to date
to bore us with?

> >
> > � �Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.

> > Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
> > children as sexual partners.
>
> NURSE!! Quick the nedle, he's on about sex with children again.

That's about the 1000 time you've posted
that. Have you nothing moreup to date
to bore us with?

>

> You can not interact with competent
> > adults in a consensually sexual
> > way.
>
> And again with the sex.
>
> �You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
> > it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
>
> And again with the sex with boys and patients in mental hospitals.
> >
> > � �That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
> > honest about it.
>
> And what *you* are is a mental case who needs to find himself some jew
> shrink
> before you start running amok and doing someone an injury. What's
> wrong with you
> anyway?

That's about the 1000 time you've posted

that. Have you nothing moreup to date
to bore us with?

> >
> > �Michael- Hide quoted text -

[B.H. Cramer]

"Michael Ejercito" <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d1ab1ffd-ea50-41f0...@y10g2000prc.googlegroups.com...

Hardly. Why do you find it necessary to resort to childish nonsense and lies
with your every post, greaser?

Are you on the payroll?

Michael

[B.H. Cramer]

"george" <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote in message
news:a1d47cb8-6a4d-461e...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

Does your frizzy haired yiddess wife tell you she is self confident, black
cunt?

Has she outed you as a fucktard yet?

[B.H. Cramer]

"Michael Ejercito" <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:ed30812b-960c-4e72...@s1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

> That is true.

It's not gender specific, stupid. Besides, I only call cunts "cunt", cunt.

Michael

[Michael Ejercito]

On Apr 27, 7:45 pm, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:

So thirty million white Russians helped Stalin kill white people?

>
>
>
> >    You are a Nazi.
>
> >    As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a
>
> Oh no, not again.

It is the perfect response to those like you.

>
> Snip.  You are a pathetic little fool.  For Christ's sake get some
> mental help
> before they take you ack to the loony bin.
>
>
>
> >    Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
> > Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
> > children as sexual partners.
>
> NURSE!! Quick the nedle, he's on about sex with children again.

Nazis are into that.

>
>  You can not interact with competent
>
> > adults in a consensually sexual
> > way.
>
> And again with the sex.
>
>  You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
>
> > it a prepubescent
> > boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
>
> And again with the sex with boys and patients in mental hospitals.
>
>
>
> >    That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
> > honest about it.
>
> And what *you* are is a mental case who needs to find himself some jew
> shrink
> before you start running amok and doing someone an injury. What's
> wrong with you
> anyway?
>

I do not go around denying the Holocaust.

Michael

[Michael Ejercito]

On Apr 28, 12:18 am, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:d1ab1ffd-ea50-41f0...@y10g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 25, 7:34 pm, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:8f719619-18a3-4291...@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> > On Apr 25, 4:32 pm, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>
> > > "Patrick Keenan" <t...@dev.null> wrote in message
>
> > >news:0qWdnb7zXK_hw27U...@supernews.com...
>

Why do you find it necessary to call people "greaser"?

Because they keep outwitting you?

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.

Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor

children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent

adults in a consensually sexual

way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be

it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.

Michael

[Boed...@isp.com]

On Apr 28, 12:18 am, "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:

> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

Probably not, he's just simple minded like the rest of the wannabes.
He looks at that stuff
in Oyvey's site and accepts it as the truth. OyVay is a weirdo,
*that* is not in
doubt, so it is safe to assume that those who swallow his drivel are
a shillng short
of a pound and a quid short.

[Boed...@isp.com]

He's living proof that people should marry their own kind. These
fools who marry
out turn their backs on their own race and turn traitor.

[I'll Always Be 28/04/09]

In article
<73934d6b-77fb-43ec-b739-346eb2dc5af1@y1
0g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
"Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com>
wrote:

Don't be daft. Anyone that would marry
you is a danger to both races.

[_ G O D _]

"I'll Always Be 28/04/09" <aussie...@invalid.invalid> wrote
news:aussies_suck-A5EE...@aries.weretis.net...
>
>
> "Boed...@isp.com" <Boed...@isp.com> wrote:

>
>> "B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Has she outed you as a fucktard yet?
>>
>> He's living proof that people should marry their
>> own kind. These fools who marry out turn their
>> backs on their own race and turn traitor.
>
> Don't be daft. Anyone that would marry
> you is a danger to both races.

Which two races you are talking about? - A retards and a hillbillies?
Because interbreeding can hardly be considered a danger to both
of them while immensely complimenting all of the races in the world....
--
_____________________________________________________

I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--

[Michael Ejercito]

http://www.holocaust-history.org/

Michael

[B.H. Cramer]

Is the Holocaust a Hoax?

Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced
that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.

Fred A. Leuchter is America's leading specialist on the design and

fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers. In
1988, Leuchter scraped samples from the alleged gas chamber walls in
Auschwitz, Birkenau and Lublin. Cyanide residue would be clearly evident on
all these walls if gassings did occur. To his astonishment, Leuchter found
no significant cyanide traces in any one of these rooms.

In 1991, the Polish government repeated these tests to disprove Leuchter's
findings, but they as well found no evidence of any gassings ever occurring.

The structural integrity of these "gas chambers" is also extremely faulty.
These rooms have ordinary doors and windows which are not hermetically
sealed! There are large gaps between the floors and doors. If the Germans
had attempted to gas anyone in these rooms, they would have died themselves,
as the gas would have leaked and contaminated the entire area. Also, no
equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings.
Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers.
There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors
or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.

Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body
has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have
been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died
of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were
murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields
should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one
body has ever been discovered.

The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to
arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or
even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever
presented were drawn up AFTER the war.

Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas
chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million
Jews!

Even The Diary of Anne Frank is a hoax. Portions of the diary were written
with a ball point pen. These pens were not in use at the time Anne Frank
lived.

It is not denied concentration camps existed. Tragically, many died of
typhus or starvation, as often happens in such situations. There is,
however, no evidence that any gassings occurred for the reasons of genocide.

Israel continues to receive trillions of dollars worldwide as retribution
for Holocaust gassings. Our country has donated more money to Israel than to
any other country in the history of the world -- over $35 billion per year,
everything included. If not for our extravagantly generous gifts to Israel,
every family in America could afford a brand new Mercedes Benz. Surely the
American people would be outraged if they realized their hard-earned money
is being squandered in these difficult times.

With all this money at stake for Israel, it is easy to comprehend why this
Holocaust hoax is so secretly guarded. The Jewish name for Holocaust is
"Shoah." In Zionist circles, it is known as "Shoah Business." If nothing
else, this unbelievable coverup demonstrates the irrepressible Zionist
influence and control of our country. Their only defense against the facts
is to cry out "antisemitic," "Skinhead" or "Nazi," whereas the majority of
those who question the Holocaust are ordinary citizens...though you would
never know it from the media.

In whatever way you can, please help shatter this profitable myth. It is
time we stop sacrificing America's welfare for the sake of Israel and spend
our hard-earned dollars on Americans.
(For more information contact The Institute for Historical Review P.O. Box
2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659 USA).

Jewish Orchestra performing at Theresienstadt 'Konzentrationslager' Camp.
Photo taken by Kurt Gerron, Jewish wartime film producer.

There are compelling reasons to believe that the so-called holocaust never
existed. Page 223, in The Diary of Anne Frank, (Pan Horizons edition, Pan
Books Ltd., London, 1989), indicates that the size of Auschwitz, the most
notorious of all German work camps, WAS VERY SMALL, with only 11,000 people
(many of whom may not even have been Jews) being evacuated by the Germans at
the time of the Russian advance in 1945. Certainly, compared to Spielberg's
film, Schindler's List (which Emilie Schindler, Oskar's widow, said was full
of lies), and other Jewish propaganda, that millions upon millions of Jews
were systematically exterminated, 11,000 people is a very small number.
Simple arithmetic tells us that the Germans would have had to have had
hundreds of camps, or else they would have had to exterminate 137 people PER
HOUR, in order for six million Jews to have been exterminated at such small
camps as Auschwitz, a feat that would have been humanly impossible
considering that, according to Douglas Reed's Behind the Scene and The
Controversy of Zion, a mere 850,000 soldiers and others were killed by the
entire German and Japanese war machines combined during WW2 (see p.397-400
of Douglas Reed's book Controversy of Zion).

People who would believe the Jewish propaganda that six million Jews were
exterminated by Hitler must KEEP IN MIND THE SMALL SCALE CONSTRUCTION OF
AUSCHWITZ AND THE VERY FEW OTHER GERMAN WORK CAMPS THAT EXISTED DURING WW2.

On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS - KENW-TV) said that when
Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was
told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years. Again, simple arithmetic tells us that
25,000 times a half dozen camps does not equal 6,000,000. In fact, it
doesn't even equal 600,000. . . .

It is an interesting fact that the number of so-called persecuted Jews KEEPS
INCREASING. Hal Greenwald, program director for the Hillel Foundation at
Duke University, a Jewish student group, has been promoting the idea that
NINE MILLION JEWS WERE EXTERMINATED IN HITLER'S GAS CHAMBERS (New York
Times, Nov. 9, 1991, AP). NOW IT'S 9 MILLION AND GROWING. ..JUST LIKE OUR
DEBT/TAX MONEY SUPPLY...THE NUMBERS JUST KEEP COMING OUT OF THIN AIR. .
.(The Bible Caused Economic and Financial Slavery in the New World Order by
Lee Cheney).

The Holocaust Issue: Three Christian Views

Christian Responsibility to Truth by Herman Otten
While most Revisionists appear to be opposed to the construction of the [US
government] Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC, right next to some of our
nations's most cherished monuments, I say: Let it be built! One day it will
serve as a monument to the stupidity of modern man, who can still accept a
hoax as a fact. Hopefully it will then serve as a reminder to study all the
facts and evidence, and repudiate all hoaxes.

The day is surely coming when all the evidence showing that the Germans
never exterminated six million Jews can no longer be suppressed. Truth is
not determined by majority vote. I learned this lesson in high school, and
since then have repeatedly discovered how the majority of scholars, even
within our churches, can be in error. That our presidents, senators and
congressmen are all supposed to be convinced that the Germans killed six
million Jews, that almost all of our nation's professors and churchmen are
said to maintain that the Holocaust is a fact, doesn't make it a fact.

There is no dispute over the fact that large numbers of Jews were deported
to concentration camps and ghettos, or that many Jews died or were killed
during World War II. Revisionist scholars have presented evidence, which
"exterminationists" have not been able to refute, showing that there was no
German program to exterminate Europe's Jews, and that the estimate of six
million Jewish wartime dead is an irresponsible exaggeration.

The Holocaust -- the alleged extermination of some six million Jews (most of
them by gassing) -- is a hoax and should be recognized as such by Christians
and all informed, honest and truthful men everywhere.

Here are the reasons that have impressed me as particularly persuasive in
coming to my own conclusion that the Revisionist view of the Holocaust story
is the correct one:
- There is no convincing or substantial evidence for the allegation of mass
killings in gas chambers in the wartime German camps. Careful
investigation -- in particular that carried out by American engineer Fred
Leuchter -- has thoroughly discredited the "gas chamber" extermination
claims.

- The most reliable statistics available cannot be reconciled with the
legendary "six million" figure. The best evidence indicates that no more
than a million, or perhaps a million and a half, European Jews perished from
all causes during the war years.

- Neither the major Jewish organizations in the United States, nor the
wartime Allied governments, nor the International Red Cross, nor the Vatican
acted as if they seriously believed the wartime extermination propaganda.

- Although the German government kept extensive and detailed records of its
wartime Jewish policy, not a single document has ever been found which
substantiates or even refers to an extermination program or policy. Instead,
the voluminous German records confiscated by the Allies at the end of the
war clearly show that the German "final solution" program was one of
emigration and deportation, not extermination.

- Even prominent Jewish "exterminationist" historians now acknowledge that
the stories of gassings and extermination in camps in Germany proper are not
true, in spite of the fact that such claims were once seriously made,
particularly at the great Nuremberg Trial of 1945-1946.

- The Holocaust story now centers on just six former camps in Poland. The
so-called "evidence" presented to prove mass exterminations in these camps
is qualitatively no better than the now discredited "evidence" once cited
for extermination in the camps in Germany proper.

- Much of the so-called "evidence" presented by "exterminationists" over the
years has already been thoroughly discredited. For example, the well-known
horrific photographs of piles of corpses taken in camps in western Germany
at the end of the war are now acknowledged to be photos of victims of
disease and malnutrition who perished as indirect victims of the war in the
final weeks and months of the conflict. Also, so-called "confessions" --
such as those of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoss -- have been shown to be
untruthful and extracted by torture. Many of the official reports and
testimonies presented as "evidence" by the prosecution in the Nuremberg
trials have since been shown to be lies.

- The fact that so many Jews "survived" German rule during the war -- many
of them even in so-called "extermination" centers such as
Auschwitz-Birkenau -- is enough to show that there was no German program or
policy to exterminate the Jews of Europe.

View of the swimming pool at Auschwitz 'Konzentrationslager' Camp

The Holocaust is a hoax. The time has come for Christian scholars and
pastors to recognize this, and to stop perpetrating a hoax as the truth. A
Christian is not free to believe and promote a lie about any person or
nation. True Christian scholars should at least read what the Revisionists
write.

Many have said to us: "What difference does it make? The truth of the
Holocaust is of no concern to Christians." Nonsense! A Christian is not free
to believe and promote a lie about any person or nation. A Christian is
guided by truth and facts, not emotions and majority opinion.

If Christians can accept as historical fact the Holocaust, despite all the
powerful evidence that it is a hoax, what does that say about their ability
to evaluate evidence? What about their scholarship? Is it any wonder that
some Revisionists, who have made a careful study of the Holocaust, question
the scholarship of Christians, so many of whom swallow as absolute truth
what is clearly a hoax?

I have been told numerous times, even by theologians who claim to be
orthodox: "I don't care whether it was six million or one Jew, even one is
too many." Such an attitude shows contempt for the truth. A Christian is to
show true love, and the Apostle Paul tells us that love is "happy with the
truth." (1 Cor. 13:6) The writing of Proverbs tells us: "Speak out for those
who can't speak, for the rights of those who are doomed. Talk up, render
fair decisions, and defend the rights of the poor and needy people."
(Proverbs 31:9)

A Christian bases his faith upon facts and absolute truth, not feelings and
emotion. A Christian recognizes that only God is all-knowing. A Christian is
willing to listen to evidence and evaluate various viewpoints. He doesn't
close his mind to the facts and evidence. He doesn't start out with the
assumption that the Jew is right and the German is wrong, or that the Jew is
wrong and the German is right. He looks at the evidence. Those who say they
don't care if it was six million or one are showing a despicable attitude
toward truth. They are saying: "We don't care about the truth." Such an
attitude is sinful and worldly. Is it any wonder that so many then go on to
act as it they don't care about another man's wife or property? The
truthfulness of the Holocaust is a moral issue. Those who maintain that the
Germans exterminated some six million Jews, most of them by gassing, are
seeing to it that the Christian Church can no longer avoid speaking out.
Churches are being pushed, as never before, to have special services
commemorating the Holocaust.

A Christian is ready to change his opinion if the evidence shows he is
wrong. Numerous times we have invited "exterminationists" to refute the
Revisionists.

Some tell us that we have not shown love to the Jews, and that we are being
racists and anti-Semitic when we publish articles by Revisionists
questioning the Holocaust, and when we insist that Jesus Christ is the only
way to heaven.

We have repeatedly emphasized in many editorials that the Bible teaches that
there is no special chosen race. All those -- regardless of color, race,
nationality, sex, wealth, et cetera -- who trust in the merits of Jesus
Christ alone for their salvation are God's chosen people and will go to
heaven. Those who tell Jews, Muslims, and any other non-Christian that they
worship the true God, and can get to heaven without Christ, are not showing
true love to the Jews and other non-Christians.

The so-called "fact" of the Holocaust is being used to deport innocent men
from this country who, as teenagers, served with the German armed forces. In
some cases they have been sent back to certain death in Communist lands. The
[US government's] Office of Special Investigation is using the Holocaust as
an excuse to force from the United States even such a reputable person as
the scientist Arthur Rudolph.

Israel is using the "fact" of the Holocaust as an excuse to execute John
Demjanjuk, an innocent Ukrainian-American. "The Jewish people have a long
score to settle with the Ukrainian people" says Dov Ben-Meir, a deputy
speaker of Israel's Knesset [parliament]. According to this top Israeli
official, "unaccounted numbers" of Ukrainians "collaborated with the Nazi
regime, especially in the annihilation of hundreds of thousands of Jews."

The "fact" of the Holocaust is being used by some to deny that Christianity
is the only true religion, or that Jesus Christ rose from the dead.

Israel is using the "fact" of the Holocaust as an excuse to kill
Palestinians in Israel. This slaughter, together with the anti-scriptural
notions of the Israel-first Millennialists, almost all of whom believe in
the Holocaust, could lead to another bloody war.

The Holocaust is not some innocent hoax, such as children's fairy tales that
entertain and have no evil consequences.
The "chosen people" and "Holocaust" myths make mission work among
non-Christians far more difficult. Arabs, who are told that the Bible
teaches that their land belongs to the Jews, find it more difficult to
believe what the Bible says about Christ.
(Herman Otten is a Lutheran pastor and editor-publisher of the weekly
Christian News of New Haven, Missouri. This commentary is excerpted from his
address at the Ninth IHR Conference. The complete text is published in the
Fall 1989 Journal).

Celebrating Hannakkak at Westerbork 'Konzentrationslager' Camp, in Holland

"Victims Deserve Better" by Joseph Sobran
I haven't been to the new United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, but even
a Washington Post reporter was shocked by what he describes its "outrageous"
anti-Christian propaganda. The exhibition apparently dates anti-Semitism
from the birth of Christ. And of course the implication of the Museum is
that mass murder is worse when its victims are Jews.
Some surprisingly critical notes have been struck in the reviews of the
Museum. Kay Larson, art critic for New York magazine, objects that "the
Germans depicted here . . . are almost exclusively Nazis. . . Most American
children who endure the walk-through will think of Germans as Nazi pigs."

She continues:
The Jews endured the most dementedly calculated and well-documented -- but
hardly the only -- case. To separate the Nazi evil from other evils is
understandable but Eurocentric. It trivializes all suffering but its own. .
. It awards special, extra-human stature to the victims. Nothing that occurs
inside Israel can be wrong, because Jews were gassed at Auschwitz. And so
people set themselves apart from, against, and above others.

She has caught the note of most Holocaust rhetoric: intense self-absorption.
This is a human reaction, and it can be excused up to a point. That point
comes when those whose rights have been violated begin disregarding others'
rights, as when Jewish apologists for Israel feel persecuted by criticism of
Israel's brutality toward non-Jews.

Even many pro-Israel Jews feel uneasy about the Museum being in America, on
government land, paid for with tax money. The implication of its presence is
that all Gentiles, especially Christians, need to be instructed, to have
their consciousness raised, even to be made to feel guilty about Jewish
suffering. As if we didn't know that murder and persecution are wrong! As if
Israel were a moral model for *us*!

In the same way, the implication of the word "anti-Semitism" is that the
chief moral test for anyone is whether he has the correct attitude toward
Jews. And again, this is understandable -- but also very narrow. Murdering
Ukrainians is every bit as evil as murdering Jews, after all. But why should
we even have to say that?

The wrong lesson is being drawn. You would think that the evil of Hitler was
mere anti-Semitism as such, rather than mass murder. But if anti-Semitism
were confined to country-club snobbery, even Jews wouldn't mind it too much.
The real evil is the use of the state as an instrument of death. Government,
perverted from it modest uses, can magnify every crime unimaginably.

That is the real "lesson of the Holocaust," the lesson our time still
refuses to learn. We think it's only the Hitler or Stalin version of the
superstate that is wrong. But think how America's conduct in World War II
would have appeared to our ancestors. It's hard for us to feel the sheer
monstrosity of bombing cities.

I recently heard some interesting testimony on this point. During that war
the US government commissioned a series of propaganda films from Frank
Capra, which were made under the collective title "Why We Fight." One of
them, "The Battle for China," describes the barbarity of the "Japs," also
called "Nips," and mocked them for their "grinning yellow faces." Among the
horrors perpetrated by the Japs was the unprecedented atrocity of bombing
cities, killing civilians by the thousands!

Of course Capra and his staff didn't know that the US government was
planning to do exactly that to Japanese and German cities. In their
innocence, they assumed that only a savage, alien race could have stooped to
such barbarism.

But we have supped full with horrors. Evil bores us. Its statistical
extremes have long since lost their interest, and there is something
ritually formulaic in the demands that we profess belief in, and abhorrence
toward, Nazi and Communist abominations. "Holocaust denial" has become the
big thought crime, denounced by Christians who are quite tolerant of those
who deny the Redemption. No similar opprobrium, by the way, attaches to
Gulag denial. After all, nobody who really believes a thing wants to force
others to profess belief in it. Sincerity never demands hypocrisy.

Even the word "Holocaust" has come to seem a polemical appropriation of
human suffering that verges on the indecent. I remember an old Jewish woman
I slightly knew who had a number tattooed on her wrist. That told me all I
needed to know about Hitler, and it would be pedantic to wonder whether a
regime that was willing to brand Jews like cattle meant to kill them all.
But it would have seemed morally crass to call what that woman had been
through as a girl "the Holocaust": It's beginning to sound like a brand
name, of special utility to glib hawkers. All the victims of World War II,
including Jews, deserve more respect than that.

(Joseph Sobran is a nationally-syndicated columnist, lecturer and
Critic-at-Large for National Review. This commentary is taken from his
"Washington Watch" column in the May 13, 1993, issue of The Wanderer, a
conservative Roman Catholic weekly).

"Examine All the Evidence" by Louis Vezelis
On April 22, 1993, an ugly, monstrous edifice was dedicated in Washington,
DC. It is a grotesque museum dedicated to the victims of evil. The only
problem is that the majority of people throughout the world have been
conditioned like Pavlovian dogs to react irrationally to predetermined
stimuli. Those who refuse are summarily isolated from the rest of the
dehumanized human herd through use of meaningless but emotionally-charged
epithets.

It is quite easy to observe which newspapers are subservient to this modern
day hoax. The subject is the so-called "Holocaust Museum" built on public
land "generously" donated by the US government...

Insulting terminology in an editorial appearing in the left-wing,
pro-Zionist, anti-Christian Democrat and Chronicle [newspaper of Rochester,
New York] introduces the reader to the most obvious abuse of logic and good
taste. But, logic and good taste have systematically been expunged from the
American mind during a period of more than thirty years.

Well-informed American citizens demonstrated [in Washington, DC, on April
22] against the historically false accusations constantly made against the
German people and other nationalities whose only real crime was resisting
the international gangsters who facetiously call their brand of exploitation
"Communism."

The Democrat and Chronicle editorial starts out:
The mindless folks who were waving signs at the opening of the Holocaust
Memorial Museum in Washington, DC, last week claiming that the Holocaust
never happened merely demonstrate why the museum is so important: to
preserve the facts, before they disappear in the mists of history.

These "mindless folks" include none other than well-educated professors and
professional historians, investigative reporters and, in general, are among
the most descent people of a civilized society. It is their *right and duty*
to examine all the evidence, and draw the truthful conclusions concerning
what really happened in history.

There is already a strong indication that those who promote the Holocaust
story are afraid of the truth. That can only explain the need for ridiculing
those who seek only to present the entire matter before an open world forum
of unbiased and unprejudiced investigators. Because the preponderance of
objective and factual evidence shows the promoters of the Holocaust story to
be libelous frauds, sneak tactics and irrational emotionalism must be used.

We are concerned for the truth. Only those who are not of the truth must
resort to lies and bloodshed. Facts by themselves do not constitute truth.
Truth is in the judgment . . .
The Hollywood cosmetics exploiting the unfortunate victims of death do not
prove anything. For example, to film or photograph dead bodies, and then
label them according to one's political need is a travesty of justice and
truth beyond the capability of morally responsible individuals. Facts must
be correctly interpreted before they can tell something of truth.
Another example is the famous "Anne Frank Diary" which has been foisted upon
the American people at all levels. We all wept at the Hollywood tear-jerker
action on the silver screen. Decent people reacted as expected by the
unscrupulous falsifiers of fact. It has come to the attention of more and
more people that this diary is a fraud. Yes, it has been proven to be fake.
Public school facilities are periodically used to foist this fraud upon
unsuspecting citizenry to re-enforce the psychological brainwashing.

Anne Frank was not fake: She really did live. But everything else about her
life is a melodramatic, money-making operation to overwhelm the world with
hatred for a nation. . . No one says anything comparable about the children
brutally murdered by the Soviets when they occupied the Baltic States in
1940, and Germany in 1945.

A French Professor whose love for truth is greater than his love for fame
and life, Robert Faurisson, has proven that the alleged "diary" of Anne
Frank could not have been written by her . . .

While the American people are being lulled into very dangerous apathy by
being fed psycho-babble, a real holocaust, including child murder, is taking
place every day in occupied Palestine. . .

Could it be that someone is trying to put a guilt complex on the American
people so they will not dare raise a loud voice of protest against greater
evils?
(Louis Vezelis, O.F.M., is editor of The Seraph, a traditionalist Roman
Catholic monthly published by the Franciscan Friars (Order of St. Francis of
Assisi) of Rochester, New York. This commentary is from an editorial by
Bishop Vezelis in the May 1993 issue of The Seraph).
Articles reprinted by permission from The Journal of Historical Review, Vol.
13, Number 5 (Sept./Oct. 1993): P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA.

Children in Belsen 'Konzentrationslager' Camp, 1945 from BBC documentary "In
the Camps"

You Have a Right to Know the Truth!

David Irving: Intrepid Battler for Historical Truth by Mark Weber
Soviet premier Nikita Kruschev might have had David Irving in mind when he
once warned that historians are dangerous because they have the power to
upset everything. German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck once said that the
main thing is not to write history, but to make it. Irving is a man who has
been able to do some of both.

He is also living proof that the life of a historian need not be dull. The
leftist British daily The Guardian once commented, "If one can overlook his
outrageously odious views, Irving -- like Hitler -- can be a funny man. The
humor comes from a hint of self-mockery and an obvious delight in making
liberal flesh creep."

At the Eleventh IHR Conference in October 1992 -- as he had in his
presentations at the IHR Conferences of 1983, 1989 and 1990 -- this good
friend of the Institute for Historical Review not only shed new light on
important chapters of twentieth-century history, he delighted attendees with
humorous updates on some of the new ways he had found to make liberal flesh
creep.

In the three decades since he published his first book, Irving has firmly
established himself as not only one of the most successful and widely-read
historians of our time, but also as one of the most courageous.

He has an enviable track record of uncovering startling new facts about even
supposedly well-known episodes of history. His effectiveness is due in very
large measure to his discovery of original source materials, such as
diaries, original documents, and so forth, from both official and private
sources. He is tenacious in his ceaseless digging in just about every
important historical archive in the western world.

A professional historian, Irving has little respect for taxpayer-financed
scholars who are guilty of what he calls "inter-historian incest," and who
thereby help to keep alive dangerous myths and legends left over from
wartime propaganda.

His first work, The Destruction of Dresden, was published in 1963 when he
was 25 years old. Since then, he has published more than two dozen books,
many of them best-sellers, including biographies of Hermann Goring, Winston
Churchill, and Erwin Rommel. He is currently at work on a biography of
Joseph Goebbels.

Several of Irving's books have appeared in various languages, and several
have been serialized in prominent periodicals, including the Sunday Express,
the Sunday Telegraph and Der Spiegel.

Over the years, he has also contributed articles to some 60 British and
foreign periodicals, including the Daily Telegraph and the Sunday Express in
London, the Mainichi Shimbun in Tokyo, and Stern and Der Spiegel in Hamburg.

Irving's reputation first came under vicious attack following the
publication in 1977 of Hitler's War, a monumental work that was hysterically
criticized for its contention that Hitler did not order the extermination of
Europe's Jews. The mass killings must have been carried out by Himmler and
his cohorts behind Hitler's back, Irving concluded at that time.

As a journalist for Time magazine once told him, "Until Hitler's War you
couldn't put a foot wrong, you were the darling of the media. After it, they
heaped slime on you."
So enraged was the Zionist Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith by this
book that the shadowy organization promptly added his name to its
ever-growing list of enemies. As it turned out, the ADL's troubles with
Irving were only just beginning.

The international campaign against him became even more vicious following
the publication in 1981 of Uprising, a history of the 1956 anti-Communist
revolt in Hungary. This book enraged the ADL crowd because it does not
whitewash the significant Jewish role in the Hungarian Communist regime.

Irving has made several highly successful speaking and promotion tours in
Germany, Canada, Australia, South Africa, the United States, and other
countries. German listeners in particular delight in hearing an Englishman
say out loud what many in that country believe in their souls but have been
intimidated into keeping to themselves. In Germany, Irving has become a kind
of conscience for a people who have been largely robbed of their own.

A startling climax in the second "Holocaust Trial" of Ernst Zundel in 1988
was the testimony of Irving, who was the last of 23 defense witnesses. He
stunned the completely packed Toronto courtroom by announcing that he had
changed his mind about the Holocaust story. During his three days on the
stand, he explained in detail why he now endorses the Revisionist view of
the extermination story.

In June 1989, Irving published the British edition of The Leuchter Report.
This handsome, illustrated edition, for which he wrote a foreword, was
launched by him at a press conference in London. He told the journalists
there that the infamous extermination gas chambers of Auschwitz and Majdanek
did not exist, except, perhaps, as the brainchild invention of Britain's
wartime propaganda bureau, the Political Warfare Executive (PWE).

A magnificent 860-page Focal Point edition of Hitler's War was published
last year. Taking account of his most recent research and insights,
references to so-called "extermination camps" have been removed from this
revised edition. And in his introduction, Irving deftly tears apart one
historical legend after another.

This work -- the product of decades of patient research and writing -- has
proven particularly enraging to the enemies of truth in history.

In addition to the usual lies, his adversaries have even turned to criminal
burglary and arson in their fitful and frantic efforts to silence him.

Not long ago, an official of the American Jewish Committee, a certain
Kenneth S. Stern, declared that Irving "NEVER has been considered a serious
historian." (The Oregonian, Portland, Oct. 7, 1992).

That is simply a baldfaced lie.

In fact, Irving's remarkable abilities have been acknowledged by some of the
most prominent names in the field. British historian Hugh Trevor-Roper,
writing in the Sunday Times of London, once declared, "No praise can be too
high for Irving's indefatigable scholarly industry." Trevor-Roper also
called Irving one of the "few guides I would entirely trust . . .
indefatigable in pursuit of the evidence, fearless in face of it, sound in
judgment . . ."

Another prominent British historian, A. J. P. Taylor, once wrote of him:
"David Irving is a patient researcher of unrivalled industry and success."

David John Cawdell Irving was born in Hutton, Essex, England, on March 24,
1938, the son of an illustrator and Royal Navy commander. His father and
mother were both well-known writers. After a liberal arts education at the
four-century-old Sir Anthony Browne's school in Brentwood, Essex, young
Irving won a scholarship to study physics at the Imperial College of Science
and Technology in London.

It did not take long, though, for him to realize that his life's calling
would not be in the hard sciences.

In 1959 he moved to Germany's industrial Ruhr region to spend a year working
in a steel mill to perfect his fluency in German. Then, after a stint
working as a clerk-stenographer with the US Strategic Air Command at an
airbase near Madrid, he returned to England to study political economy at
London's University College.

Irving speaks fluent German, very good Spanish, and quite passable French,
and reads several other languages.

On a personal note, he is the father of four daughters. His hobbies are oil
painting, travel, and cinematography, and his favorite song is the English
naval hymn, "For Those in Peril of the Sea."

He lives in the Mayfair district of London's West End, although in recent
years has spent quite a lot of time at a south Florida retreat, where he now
prefers to do his serious writing.
You'd need a pickup truck to carry away all the newspaper and magazine
clippings that have appeared over the years about Irving.

In January 1992, for example, a flurry of reports appeared in newspapers and
television broadcasts around the world suggesting that he had abandoned his
highly skeptical view of the Holocaust extermination story because of what
he had found in the postwar "memoir" of Adolf Eichmann, the German SS
officer who coordinated the wartime deportations of Jews.
Had Irving defected from the Revisionist camp? In the wake of this uproar,
he told the IHR: "My position remains unchanged." There were "certain
My-Lai-type atrocities" by German troops in the occupied Soviet territories,
but the "gas chambers and factories of death are legend," and there is no
wartime evidence of an order by Hitler to exterminate the Jews. In an
interview at the time with the London Jewish Chronicle (January 17, 1992),
Irving said, "The Jews are very foolish not to abandon the gas chamber
theory while they still have time."

Last May, a German court fined Irving 10,000 marks -- about $6,000 -- for
public statements he had made challenging the Holocaust story. His crime? At
a meeting in Munich in 1990, Irving had said that the building in the
Auschwitz main camp that has been portrayed for years as an extermination
gas chamber is a phony reconstruction (or, in German, "Attrappen").
The Munich district court refused to permit the defense to present even a
single witness or exhibit. For example, it would not permit Irving's
attorneys to call as a witness the director of the Auschwitz State Museum,
Dr. Franciszek Piper, who has privately confirmed on several occasions that
what Irving had told the meeting in 1990 is, in fact, the truth. After his
attorneys dramatically walked out of the courtroom to protest the judge's
outrageous rulings, Irving delivered a stirring plea for truth and justice
that has since been widely circulated in Germany on audio cassette and as a
leaflet. (For more on this trial, see the July-August 1992 IHR Newsletter).

Also last year, Irving played the key and highly publicized role in bringing
to light the long-suppressed diaries of Third Reich propaganda chief Dr.
Joseph Goebbels. Last July, the London Sunday Times, one of the world's most
influential papers, published extensive translated excerpts from the diary,
which Irving found and transcribed. (See report in the October 1992 IHR
Newsletter).

International and British Jewish organizations lost no time in attacking the
paper for employing Irving, and the resulting furor made headlines in
newspapers and magazines around the world. A report in the London Jewish
Chronicle headlined "Sunday Times comes under pressure" (July 17, 1992),
described the extent of the campaign to punish the paper for its
collaboration with Irving. Officials of the American Jewish Committee added
their voices to the worldwide pressure campaign, expressing particular anger
because the historian has addressed several IHR conferences. The Sunday
Times capitulated, and in breach of contract, refused to pay Irving the
agreed-upon fee of 83,000 pounds. He is suing.

On July 3, more than 300 Jewish demonstrators gathered outside Irving's
London residence to denounce him. The next day, July fourth (by the way, the
ninth anniversary of the devastating 1984 arson attack against the IHR
office-warehouse), a larger crowd of several hundred met at the same place
to shout more insults. Among the banners carried by the crowd of Marxists,
Jews, homosexuals and Rastafarians were placards reading "Return to the Road
of Lenin and Trotsky!," and "Build a Bolshevik Party, Tribune of All the
Oppressed!"

That same day, though, about 250 persons defied intimidation and threats to
hear and cheer Irving and other speakers at a Revisionist seminar in London.
Besides Irving, the audience heard addresses by Kirk Lyons, Leuchter's US
attorney, and Georgia attorney Sam Dickson (who addressed the 1986 IHR
conference).

In all this, it is gratifying to note that it is a Revisionist historian who
was -- once again -- at the forefront of historical discovery. In spite of
the well-organized international campaign to boycott and silence him, David
Irving remains at the vanguard of his profession -- and, by the way, SOLELY
on the basis of his indisputable knowledge, skill and industry.
It is also gratifying to realize that, as a result of each of those recent
controversies, hundreds of thousands -- if not millions -- of newspaper and
magazine readers around the world are now aware that a historian of
recognized international stature rejects critical aspects of the orthodox
Holocaust extermination story.

(Based on introduction of Irving at the Eleventh IHR Conference, 1992.
Reprinted by permission from The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 13,
Number 1 (Jan./Feb. 1993): P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA).

Celebrating a Jewish wedding in Westerbork 'Konzentrationslager' Camp,
Holland.

Following are four articles:
1. An opinion piece from a revisionist perspective (written by Bradley R.
Smith) on a typical reaction of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith
(ADL) to a revisionist critique of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in
Washington D.C.

2. The article by ADL spokesman Marvin Stern which appeared in The Oregonian
(Portland, OR) and is representative of the ADL response to what Mr. Stern
describes as "the growing Holocaust revisionist movement."

3. The CODOH advertisment (written by B. R. Smith) criticizing the U.S.
Holocaust Memorial Museum that so exercises the ADL and others. This is the
second major CODOH campus ad.

4. The first (and now-famous) major CODOH campus ad, also written by Bradley
R. Smith.

First a brief note from Bradley R. Smith:

"I suspect that if spokesmen for the Museum, or for the ADL, could answer
any of the questions suggested by the text of the ad, they probably would
not react to it so hysterically.
"The ad or the text of the ad has run in student newspapers at Stanford,
Georgetown, University of Michigan, SUNY-Buffalo, Michigan State, Notre Dame
and at other major campuses.
"If you have any questions or need more background please call me at (209)
627 8757. Thanks, [signed] Bradley R. Smith"
Bradley R. Smith PO Box 3267 Visalia CA 93278 Tel/Fax: (209) 733 2653

The AntiI-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith: Trapped in a Nazi Fantasyland
by Bradley R. Smith
Marvin Stern, director for the Northwest regional branch of the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL), can't conceal his bewilderment over what he
calls "the growing Holocaust revisionist movement."

Mr. Stern expressed his dismay in a column published in The Oregonian, the
largest-circulation daily in the Northwest. His alarm was triggered by the
appearance in that newspaper of our ad, "A Revisionist's View of the U.S.
Holocaust Memorial Museum."

He lays the blame for the growing influence of revisionism on the
"ignorance" and "anti-semitism" of Americans. He appears not to understand
that he's charging tens of millions of American citizens with being
ignorant, anti-Jewish bigots (a recent Roper poll reported 20 to 30 percent
of adult Americans doubt they are being told the truth about the Holocaust
story).

Spokesmen for the ADL have propagandized themselves into an empty
intellectual corner. Having refused to judge revisionist research on its
merits, refusing still to admit that revisionists have any substantive
arguments whatever, refusing debate or even an exchange of civility, the
ADL'ers are left with no intellectual tools to work with but invective,
misrepresentation, slander, and a sickly dependence on playing their "nazi"
card.

One result of this intellectually and psychologically stunted behavior is
that many ADL'ers appear to be obsessed with nazis and nazism, neo-nazis,
intimations of nazism, rumors about nazis and crazy nazi conspiracies to
rehabilitate Adolf's reputation.

Some ADL'ers, Stern appearing to be one of them, live in an imaginary nazi
wonderland where they fantasize armies of nazis marching toward them from
distant horizons, singing songs of conquest, whips in hand, about to leap
through the ADL office window to lash the hapless drudges inside and
mistreat them sexually. Such fantasies must be traumatizing for those who
suffer them, but to others they can appear comic and infantile.

The text of my ad, which prompted Stern's response, makes at least two
claims which admittedly are controversial. It asserts that the Holocaust
Museum exhibits no proof that homicidal gas chambers existed anywhere in
Europe, and no proof that even one child, woman or man was "gassed" at any
German camp liberated by the Allies. I flew to Washington, toured the
Museum, and that's my assessment of its exhibits.

Mr. Stern writes that the best response to the "outrageous lies" of
revisionism, that is, the text of my ad about the Museum, is to "reiterate
the truth" and "repeat the facts." It's good advice, but Stern avoids it
like the plague. Instead, he reveals the common ADL self-serving obsession
with hate movements growing like cancers in American society. He doesn't
even try to assure his readers that the Museum does, in fact, exhibit proof
of one gas chamber or one victim of a gas chamber. Why?

The Marvin Sterns and the ADL face a conundrum. They can continue to rail
with empty irrationalism against legitimate revisionist research and watch
the number of Americans who are increasingly unsure what to believe about
the Holocaust story increase year after year.

Or they can turn to the orthodox scholars in the field for help in
responding to revisionist questions. That would be the adult thing to do.
The ADL'ers however, true to form, have chosen to do the childish thing --
to substitute schoolyard insults for a grown-up exchange of ideas.

Stern's article in The Oregonian ran under the head, "Holocaust Revisionists
Should Be Challenged, Repudiated With Truth." Marvin and I are in complete
agreement on this one. Do it! Challenge the claims in my ad with truth! That
has always been what I've asked for. It's my invitation to the ADL'ers and
my challenge to them -- and to all others. Respond to my ads with truth. I
don't EVER want to run an ad that contains an inadvertent error of fact.

Why do the Marvin Sterns talk about repudiating revisionism with "truth" and
always evade doing so? Here's my guess. While revisionists almost certainly
are not right about everything, we're not wrong about everything either. No
one is wrong about everything! That's what terrifies Marvin Stern and his
ADL buddies. The day they admit the possibility that revisionists are not
wrong about everything, their psychological world will collapse. They'll
have admitted that revisionists are human beings, that we eat our soup with
a spoon just like they do.
And there's the rub. The ADL'ers can't afford to admit that revisionists are
ordinary men and women -- that is, human beings. The ADL committed itself to
its nazi devil fantasy half a century ago and has ridden it so long so
successfully it can't get off, no matter how broken down and exhausted the
old nag is.

Marvin Stern is probably a nice guy. He's probably a smart guy. When a smart
guy goes over the line and becomes a true believer it's almost impossible
for him to change his mind. When a true believer changes his mind he becomes
an apostate. He feels like a traitor. A dumb guy can just change his mind
and go about his business. A smart guy who's become a true believer has to
work out a theory explaining how, being so smart, he could have believed
something so dumb so long. It's not easy. I know.

Marvin, I used to believe everything about the Holocaust story you believe
now. It's not a sin to be wrong. It's human. You have a theory you believe
is true, I have a theory I think is true. Let's talk things over. You know
how it goes. I listen to you. You listen to me. We have a beer. We settle
the world's problems.
(Bradley R. Smith is director of Committee for Open Debate on the
Holocaust.)

A Revisionist's View of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museumin Washington,
D.C.
by Bradley R. Smith

After ten years in the planning, $165 million in start-up costs and a
government guarantee of tens of millions more in tax subsidies, the United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum demonstrates why, according to a Roper
Organization poll, 22 percent (some 25 millions!) of all adult Americans
have doubts about the orthodox Holocaust story.

What are the facts?

The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum displays no proof anywhere of homicidal
"gassing" chambers and no proof that even ONE INDIVIDUAL was "gassed" at any
camp liberated by Allied armies.

"Proof" for a gas chamber at Birkenau is a plastic model created by a Polish
ARTISTE. A plastic copy of a metal door is displayed as "proof" of a
homicidal gas chamber at Maidanek. And, INCREDIBLY, the Museum has simply
"dropped" the Auschwitz gas chamber, the basement room visited yearly by
hundreds of thousands of tourists in Poland.

There is no mention of the alleged gas chambers at Buchenwald or even at
Dachau, where after World War Two American G.I.s and German civilians were
assured that more than 200,000 victims were "gassed and burned."

Human soap? Human skin lamp shades? Not a sign of them in this Museum. These
monstrous lies are now all gone -- straight down the memory hole!

The notion that eyewitness testimony given under highly politicized and
emotional circumstances, which this museum relies so heavily on, is, PRIMA
FACIE, true, was refuted by the Israeli Supreme Court when it acquitted John
Demjanjuk of being "Ivan the Terrible." The Israeli Court found that the
eyewitnesses who testified against Demjanjuk could not be believed!

Deborah Lipstadt argues in her much-praised Denying the Holocaust, that
revisionists ["deniers"] should not be debated because there "can not be"
another side to the Holocaust story. She charges that it is "hateful" to
listen to a defense of those accused of mass murder! In essence, she argues
that we bury America's old civil virtues of free inquiry and open debate --
but to what end?

The Deborah Lipstadts -- and there is a clique of them on every campus --
work to suppress revisionist research and demand that students and faculty
ape their fascist behavior. If you refuse to accept the Lipstadt clique as
your intellectual FUHRERS, you risk being slandered as an "anti-semite."
These quasi religious Holocaust zealots claim that because of the "purity"
of their own feelings about the Jewish experience during World War Two,
yours are soiled if you doubt what they preach as "truth."

Winston Churchill, in his massive six-volume history of World War Two, and
Dwight D. Eisenhower in his memoirs, both omitted all reference to "gas
chambers" and their use in an alleged "genocide" of the Jews. How do the
Museum and the Deborah Lipstadts explain that?

To many it will appear impossible that deception on such a grand scale can
actually be taking place. Yet such deception is not unusual in the realms of
politics, ideology or religion. We are being deceived for one reason, and
one reason only -- we have refused to listen to the other side of the story.

The Operation and Technique of the Museum

The Museum's exhibit technique is a mixture of sinister suggestion and
dishonest omission. The first display confronting visitors beginning the
Museum tour is a wall-sized photograph of American soldiers looking at
corpses smoldering on a pyre. The "context" in which you see the photo
suggests that the dead are "exterminated" Jews.

But were the prisoners killed or did they die of typhus or some other
disease during the last terrible weeks of the war? Autopsies made by Allied
medical personnel found that inmates died of disease. Not one was found to
have been "gassed." ALL SUCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IS PURPOSELY OMITTED FROM
THE EXHIBIT. WE DON'T EVEN KNOW THAT THE DEAD PICTURED IN THE PHOTO ARE
JEWS!

Unable to judge the significance of the photograph, and not wanting to
believe the Museum would mislead you, you are moved to accept the false and
manipulative suggestion that it represents the "genocide" of the Jews.

THE LAST BARRIER

Academic bureaucrats, career-driven professors and an opulent Holocaust
Lobby of self-described intellectual "giants" are those who form the last
barrier against a free exchange of ideas. It is childish and dishonest to
insinuate that open debate is "dangerous" to the Jewish community. Don't
believe it! Open debate BENEFITS Jews and Gentiles alike -- for precisely
the same reasons!

Contact CODOH to inquire about speakers or to view our one-hour video on the
scandal of the Auschwitz "gas chamber." Demonstrate to the fuhrers of
conformity on your campus that you want intellectual liberty, not "leaders."

This ad [when published in newspapers] has been published and paid for by
CODOH Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
PO Box 3267 Visalia CA 93278 Tel/Fax: 209 733 2653
(CODOH) was founded to promote a free exchange of ideas about the Holocaust
story. CODOH is not a membership organization and is not affiliated with any
political party or group. Only your contributions enable us to publish this
ad in college and high school newspapers across the country. Our overhead is
minimal. Every donation is welcome. Your support is needed. 1093

THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY: The Case For Open Debate
by Bradley R. Smith

THE CONTEMPORARY ISSUE

No subject enrages campus Thought Police more than Holocaust Revisionism. We
debate every other great historical issue as a matter of course, but
influential pressure groups with private agendas have made the Holocaust
story an exception. Elitist dogma manipulated by special interest groups
corrupts everything in academia. Students should be encouraged to
investigate the Holocaust story the same way they are encouraged to
investigate every other historical event. This isn't a radical point of
view. The premises for it were worked out centuries ago during a little
something called the Enlightenment.

THE HISTORICAL ISSUE
Revisionists agree with establishment historians that the German National
Socialist State singled out the Jewish people for special and cruel
treatment. In addition to viewing Jews in the framework of traditional
anti-Semitism, the Nazis also saw them as being an influential force behind
international communism. During the Second World War, Jews were considered
to be enemies of the State and a potential danger to the war effort, much
like the Japanese were viewed in this country. Consequently, Jews were
stripped of their rights, forced to live in ghettos, conscripted for labor,
deprived of their property, deported from the countries of their birth and
otherwise mistreated. Many tragically perished in the maelstrom.
Revisionists part company with establishment historians in that Revisionists
deny that the German State had a policy to exterminate the Jewish people (or
anyone else) by putting them to death in gas chambers or killing them
through abuse or neglect. Revisionists also maintain that the figure of 6
million Jewish deaths is an irresponsible exaggeration, and that no
execution gas chambers existed in any camp in Europe which was under German
control. Fumigation gas chambers did exist to delouse clothing and equipment
to prevent disease at the camps. It is very likely that it was from this
life-SAVING procedure that the myth of extermination gas chambers emerged.

Revisionists generally hold that the Allied governments decided to carry
their wartime "black propaganda" of German monstrosity over into the postwar
period. This was done for essentially three reasons. First, they felt it
necessary to continue to justify the great sacrifices that were made in
fighting two world wars. A second reason was that they wanted to divert
attention from and to justify their own particularly brutal crimes against
humanity which, apart from Soviet atrocities, involved massive incendiary
bombings of the civilian populations of German and Japanese cities. The
third and perhaps most important reason was that they needed justification
for the postwar arrangements which, among other things, involved the
annexation of large parts of Germany into Poland. These territories were not
disputed borderlands but included huge parts of Germany proper. The millions
of Germans living in these regions were to be dispossessed of their property
and brutally expelled from their homelands. Many hundreds of thousands were
to perish in the process. A similar fate was to befall the Sudetan Germans.

During the war, and in the postwar era as well, Zionist organizations joined
with the Allied Governments and became deeply involved in creating and
promulgating anti-German hate propaganda. There is little doubt that their
purpose was to drum up world sympathy and political and financial support
for Jewish causes, especially for the formation of the State of Israel.
Today, while the political benefits of the Holocaust story have largely
dissipated for the others, the story still plays an important role in the
ambitions of Zionist and other organizations in the Jewish community. It is
the leaders of these political and propaganda organizations who continue to
work to sustain the orthodox Holocaust legend and the myth of German
monstrosity during the Second World War.

Those who would claim that these interpretations are anti-Jewish are reading
into them something which simply is not there. Revisionists do not claim
that Jewish leaders or organizations did anything in the war and postwar era
which the Allied Governments themselves did not do.

For those who believe that the Nuremberg Trials revealed the truth about
German war crimes, it is a bracing shock to discover that the then Chief
Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Harlan Fiske Stone, described the
Nuremberg court as "a high-grade lynching party for Germans."

THE PHOTOGRAPHS
We've all seen "The Photographs." Endlessly. Newsreel photos taken by U.S.
and British photographers at the liberation of the German camps, and
especially the awful scenes at Dachau, Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen. These
films are typically presented in such a way in which it is either stated or
implied that the scenes resulted from deliberate policies on the part of the
Germans. The photographs are real. The uses to which they have been put are
base.

There was no German policy at any of those camps to deliberately kill the
internees. In the last months of the war, while Soviet armies were advancing
on Germany from the east, the British and U.S. air arms were destroying
every major city in Germany with saturation bombing. Transportation, the
food distribution system and medical and sanitation services all broke down.
That was the purpose of the Allied bombing, which has been described as the
most barbarous form of warfare in Europe since the Mongol invasions.

Millions of refugees fleeing the Soviet armies were pouring into Germany.
The camps still under German control were overwhelmed with internees from
the east. By early 1945 the inmate population was swept by malnutrition and
by epidemics of typhus, typhoid, dysentery and chronic diarrhea. Even the
mortuary systems broke down. When the press entered the camps with British
and U.S. soldiers, they found the results of all that. They took "The
Photographs."

Still, at camps such as Buchenwald, Dachau and Bergen-Belsen TENS OF
THOUSANDS of relatively healthy internees were liberated. They were there in
the camps when "The Photographs" were taken. There are newsreels of those
internees walking through the camp streets laughing and talking. Others
picture exuberant internees throwing their caps in the air and cheering
their liberators. It is only natural to ask why you haven't seen those
particular films and photos while you've seen the others scores and even
hundreds of times.

Jewish internees playing football at Theresienstadt 'Konzentrationslager'
Camp.
DOCUMENTS

Spokesmen for the Holocaust Lobby like to assure us that there are "tons" of
captured German documents which prove the Jewish genocide. When challenged
on this, however, they can produce only a handful of documents, the
authenticity or interpretation of which is always highly questionable. If
pressed for reliable documentation, the Lobby will then reverse itself and
claim that the Germans destroyed all of the relevant documents to hide their
evil deeds, or it will make the absurd claim that the Germans used a
simplistic code language or whispered verbal orders for mass murder into
each others' ears.

With regard to the alleged genocide of the European Jews, all available
documentation indicates that there was no order for it, no budget, no weapon
(that is, no so-called execution gas chamber) and no victim (that is, not a
single autopsied body at any camp has been shown to have been gassed).

EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY
As documentary "proofs" for the mass-murder of the European Jews fall by the
wayside, Holocaust historians depend increasingly on "eye- witness"
testimonies to support their theories. Many of these testimonies are
ludicrously unreliable. History is filled with stories of masses of people
claiming to be eyewitnesses to everything from witchcraft to flying saucers.

During and after the war there were "eyewitnesses" to mass murder in gas
chambers at Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Dachau and other camps in Germany
proper. Today, virtually all recognized scholars dismiss this eyewitness
testimony as false, and agree that there were no extermination gas chambers
in any camp in Germany proper.

Establishment historians, however, still claim that extermination gas
chambers existed at Auschwitz and at other camps in Poland. The eyewitness
testimony and the evidence for this claim is, in reality, qualitatively no
different than the false testimony and evidence for the alleged gas chambers
at the camps in Germany proper.

During the war crimes trials many "eyewitnesses" testified that Germans made
soap out of human fat and lamp shades from human skin. Allied prosecutors
even produced evidence to support these charges. For decades, highly
respected scholars at the most prestigious universities in the Western world
sanctioned these stories, leading us to believe that they were "irrefutable
truths." But with time, many such stories have become untenable, and in May
1990 Yehuda Bauer, director of Holocaust studies at Hebrew University in Tel
Aviv, admitted that: "The Nazis never made soap from Jews . . ." (quoted in
The Jerusalem Post, International Edition, 5 May 1990, p. 6). This is only
one recent example where an "irrefutable" Holocaust "truth" has been exposed
as a monstrous lie.

With regard to confessions by Germans at war crimes trials, it is now well
documented that many were obtained through coercion, intimidation and even
physical torture.

AUSCHWITZ
British Historian David Irving, perhaps the most widely read historian
writing in English, has called the Auschwitz death-camp story a "sinking
ship" and states that there were "no gas chambers at Auschwitz . . ."

The Auschwitz State Museum has recently revised its half-century-old claim
that 4 million humans were murdered there. The Museum now says maybe it was
1 million. But what proof does the Museum provide to document the 1 million
figure? None! The communist propagandists who manage the museum have put on
display piles of hair, boots and eyeglasses, etc. While such displays are
effective propaganda devices, they are worthless as historical documentation
for "gassings" or a program of "extermination."

Meanwhile, Revisionists want to know where those 3 million souls have been
the last 45 years. Were they part of the fabled Six Million?

Those who promote the Holocaust story complain that "the whole world" was
indifferent to the genocide which allegedly was occurring in German occupied
Europe. When asked why this was the case the promoters usually respond by
saying that it was due to some great moral flaw in the nature of Western
man. At other times they make the absurd claim that people did not realize
the enormity of what was happening. It is true that the world responded with
indifference. How else should people have responded to that which they did
not believe, and which for them was a non-event?

It is certain that if there had been "killing factories" in Poland murdering
millions of civilians, then the Red Cross, the Pope, humanitarian agencies,
the Allied governments, neutral governments, and prominent figures such as
Roosevelt, Truman, Churchill, Eisenhower and many others would have known
about it and would have often and unambiguously mentioned it, and condemned
it. They didn't! The promoters admit that only a tiny group of individuals
believed the story at the time -- many of whom were connected with Jewish
propaganda agencies. The rise of the Holocaust story reads more like the
success story of a PR campaign than anything else.

Winston Churchill wrote the six volumes of his monumental work, The Second
World War, without mentioning a program of mass-murder and genocide. Maybe
it slipped his mind. Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his memoir Crusade in Europe,
also failed to mention gas chambers. Was the weapon used to murder millions
of Jews unworthy of a passing reference? Was our future president being
insensitive to Jews?

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND HOLOCAUST REVISIONISM
Many people, when they first hear Holocaust Revisionist arguments, find
themselves bewildered. The arguments appear to make sense, but "How is it
possible?" The whole world believes the Holocaust story. It's just not
plausible that so great a conspiracy to suppress the truth could have
functioned for half a century.

To understand how it could very well have happened, one needs only to
reflect on the intellectual and political orthodoxies of medieval Europe, or
those of Nazi Germany or the Communist-bloc countries. In all of these
societies the great majority of scholars were caught up in the existing
political culture. Committed to a prevailing ideology and its interpretation
of reality, these scholars and intellectuals felt it was their right, and
even their duty, to protect every aspect of that ideology. They did so by
oppressing the evil dissidents who expressed "offensive" or "dangerous"
ideas. In every one of those societies, scholars became Thought Police.

In our own society, in the debate over the question of political
correctness, there are those who deliberately attempt to trivialize the
issues. They claim that there is no real problem with freedom of speech on
our campuses, and that all that is involved with PC are a few rules which
would defend minorities from those who would hurt their feelings. There is,
of course, a deeper and more serious aspect to the problem. On American
campuses today there is a wide range of ideas and viewpoints that are
forbidden to be discussed openly. Even obvious facts and realities, when
they are politically unacceptable, are denied and suppressed. One can learn
much about the psychology and methodology of Thought Police by watching how
they react when just one of their taboos is broken and Holocaust Revisionism
is given a public forum.

First they express outrage that such offensive and dangerous ideas were
allowed to be expressed publicly. They avoid answering or debating these
ideas, claiming that to do so would give them a forum and legitimacy. Then
they make vicious personal attacks against the Revisionist heretic, calling
him dirty political names such as "anti- Semite," "racist" or "neo-Nazi,"
and they even suggest that he is a potential mass murderer. They publicly
accuse the Revisionist of lying, but they don't allow the heretic to hear
the specific charge against him or to face his accusers so that he can
answer this slander.

The Holocausters accuse Revisionists of being hate filled people who are
promoting a doctrine of hatred. But Revisionism is a scholarly process, not
a doctrine or ideology. If the Holocaust promoters really want to expose
hatred, they should take a second look at their own doctrines, and a long
look at themselves in the mirror.

Anyone on campus who invites a Revisionist to speak is himself attacked as
being insensitive. When a Revisionist does speak on campus he is oftentimes
shouted down and threatened. Campus libraries and bookstores face
intimidation when they consider handling Holocaust revisionist materials.
All this goes on while the majority of faculty and university administrators
sit dumbly by, allowing political activists to determine what can be said
and what can be read on their campus.

Next, the Thought Police set out to destroy the transgressor professionally
and financially by "getting" him at his job or concocting a lawsuit against
him. The courts are sometimes used to attack Revisionism. The Holocausters
often deceptively claim that Revisionist scholarship has been proven false
during a trial. The fact is that Revisionist arguments have never been
evaluated or judged by the courts.

Finally, the Thought Police try to "straighten out" that segment of academia
or the media that allowed the Revisionists a forum in the first place.

It can be an instructive intellectual exercise to identify taboo subjects,
other than Holocaust Revisionism, which would evoke comparable responses
from Thought Police on our campuses.

Recently, some administrators in academia have held that university
administrations should take actions to rid the campus of ideas which are
disruptive to the university. This is a very dangerous position for
administrators to take. It is an open invitation to tyranny. It means that
any militant group with "troops at the ready" can rid the campus of ideas it
opposes and then impose its own orthodoxy. The cowardly administrator finds
it much easier and safer to rid the campus of controversial ideas than to
face down a group of screaming and snarling militants. But it is the duty of
university administrators to insure that the university remains a free
marketplace of ideas. When ideas cause disruptions, it is the disrupters who
must be subdued, not the ideas.

CONCLUSION
The influence of Holocaust Revisionism is growing steadily both here and
abroad. In the United States, Revisionism was launched in earnest in 1977
with the publication of the book The Hoax of the Twentieth Century by Arthur
R. Butz. Professor Butz teaches electrical engineering and computer sciences
at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.
Those who take up the Revisionist cause represent a wide spectrum of
political and philosophical positions. They are certainly not the
scoundrels, liars and demons the Holocaust Lobby tries to make them out to
be. The fact is, there are no demons in the real world. People are at their
worst when they begin to see their opponents as an embodiment of evil, and
then begin to demonize them. Such people are preparing to do something
simply awful to their opponents. Their logic is that you can do anything you
want to a demon.
That logic will not succeed.
* * *
For those wishing to verify the truthfulness of statements made in this
paper, you may want to contact experts who are prominent authorities on
these matters. It's important to ask specific, concrete questions on matters
of fact and receive direct and unambiguous answers. Organizations such as
the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Hillel and the Anti-Defamation League are not
scholarly institutions, but are primarily political and propaganda
organizations.

Auschwitz Director Comes Clean About Fraudulent "Gas Chamber"
An exclusive videotape interview Debunks a major part of the "Holocaust"
story, and reveals the deception that is STILL GOING ON. . . !
This is a video that will make you ask -- "Just how much of the 'Holocaust'
story can we believe?" -- as you learn of falsified "proofs" and deceptive
claims about "gas chambers," not from the mouths of Holocaust "revisionists"
but in the words of one of the most knowledgeable and ardent supporters of
the orthodox "Holocaust" story. This is a video that affirms what
revisionists have maintained for years: that the Soviets and Poles made a
practice of "creating" proofs of "homicidal gas chambers" AFTER World War
Two, and that the hundreds of thousands of tourists who journey to Auschwitz
each year to see for themselves proof of the "final solution" are being
deceived.

In this unprecedented interview given to Jewish revisionist David Cole, (who
has debated the "Holocaust" nationally on the Montel Williams Show and has
been profiled by CBS' 48 Hours), Dr. Franciszek Piper, Senior Curator and
Director of Archives at the Auschwitz State Museum states on camera that the
alleged "homicidal gas chamber" at the Auschwitz main camp shown off to
tourists from all over the world as being in its "original state" is, in
fact, a RECONSTRUCTION, redesigned AFTER THE WAR to look like a gas chamber.

Dr. Piper reveals to David Cole, on camera, how walls were knocked down and
holes with "Zyklon B induction chimneys" installed in the roof so that the
building could be exhibited as a "proof" of the "final solution." And he
doesn't stop there. For a solid hour Dr. Piper talks about other "proofs" at
Auschwitz for the "final solution" which are ALSO "reconstructions," and
discusses details of the camp that only a man such as he, who has worked at
Auschwitz for a quarter century, would know. Then, in stunning footage,
you'll see David Cole, while on the official tour of Auschwitz, being told
by his guide that the Auschwitz main-camp "gas chamber" is in its ORIGINAL
STATE, the same -- and there's no other word for it -- lie told to all
tourists. The uncomfortable conclusion cannot be avoided: the people who run
Auschwitz tell people things that THEY THEMSELVES KNOW ARE NOT TRUE!
Will you be able to argue with the words of a respected "Holocaust" scholar
when he states for the record that one of the main "proofs" of the "final
solution" is NO PROOF AT ALL?
(Video available from: "CODOH," POB 3267 Visalia CA 93278, or the Institute
for Historical Review P.O. Box 2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659).

"We're Loud, We're Proud, & Best of All, We're Right!"

A JEWISH REVISIONIST'S VISIT TO AUSCHWITZ by (Jew) David Cole
(Presented at the Eleventh IHR Conference, October 1992)
When I decided last September to take a well-deserved vacation, I thought,
what better destination than Europe. After all, as a Revisionist, I'd always
felt it my duty to see the concentration camps in person. My girl-friend,
though, said that she'd like to go to Europe to visit Euro-Disney, the new
Disneyland theme park in France. So I thought for a while about where to go:
Auschwitz or Euro-Disney. And as I looked around, and saw the miserable
state of the world and this country, the political and social malaise and
depression, I realized that if I did take a vacation, I wanted to go to a
place as far away from reality as possible: a fantasy land of wondrous fairy
tales. So, of course, I chose Auschwitz.

Now that I've gone through the Auschwitz main camp, Auschwitz-Birkenau,
Majdanek, Mauthausen, and Dachau, I feel even more secure in my position as
a Revisionist that there exists no convincing evidence that Jews or anyone
else were taken EN MASSE into gas chambers and killed by the Nazis at these
camps. In fact, the remains that I inspected at the camp sites seem, in many
different ways, to directly contradict these claims.

I returned to the United States with more than 25 hours of video footage
from the camps. At Majdanek I uncovered obvious tampering with the buildings
exhibited as gas chambers. This evidence was discovered when my attractive
camerawoman busted a lock and got us into a room that is not open to
tourists. There we were able to view several items in their original state,
most notably the doors, which were clearly constructed to latch from both
the outside AND the inside.

(DAVID COLE [is a Jew who] was raised and educated in Los Angeles, where he
lives and works. Because of his support for Holocaust Revisionism, he was
assaulted during a meeting at the University of California at Los Angeles on
January 22, 1992, by thugs of the Jewish Defense League, who hit him in the
face and bloodied his nose. JDL leader Irv Rubin also tried to push Cole
down a flight of stairs. In April 1992 he appeared -- along with Journal
editor Mark Weber -- as a guest on the Montel Williams Show, a nationally
syndicated television program, to present the Revisionist view of the
Holocaust story).

The high point of my visit, though, was my interview with Dr. Franciszek
Piper, Senior Curator of the Polish government's Auschwitz State Museum. He
has worked there for more than 26 years. On tape, he admits that the
so-called gas chamber in Crematory Building (Krema) I, which is shown to
half a million visitors a year as a genuine homicidal gas chamber, is in
fact a reconstruction -- even down to the holes cut into the ceiling. Piper
also admits that walls were knocked down and bathroom facilities removed. He
went on to tell us that the remains of the "white cottage," supposed site of
the first preliminary gassings at Birkenau, are also reconstructed. This was
hardly news to me. Even a quick examination of the remains of the "white
cottage" shows that the bricks are not connected in any way, but are simply
laid on top of each other like children's building blocks.

Piper has no problems with the Leuchter Report. He told me that he agrees
with Leuchter's findings regarding traces of ferro-ferric-cyanide in the
walls of Crematory Buildings (Kremas) I, II and III. So what is his
explanation for this lack of traces in the supposed homicidal gas chambers
when, by contrast, there are significant traces in the non-homicidal
delousing chambers? He told me that the amount of hydrogen cyanide (from
Zyklon) supposedly used by Germans to kill people -- unlike the amount
needed to kill lice in delousing chambers -- was not enough to leave blue
(ferro-ferric-cyanide) staining, or appreciable traces.

This argument has problems, though. For one thing, the supposed homicidal
gas chambers at Majdanek (which in reality were non-homicidal delousing
chambers) have abundant blue staining. So according to Piper's "Holocaust
logic," gassing people in Auschwitz did not leave blue stains, but gassing
people at Majdanek did. Talk about a Magic Kingdom! As we spoke, I half
expected to see Piper's nose grow as long as Pinocchio's!

The importance of Piper's revelations is obvious. The burden of proof has
now shifted decisively to the Exterminationist side. For example, Piper's
admission that the four holes in the ceiling of Crematory Building (Krema) I
were put in after the war makes ludicrous the oft-repeated claim of
Auschwitz tourists that "Now I've seen the gas chambers with my own two
eyes." Now that the often-made claims about Krema I in its present state are
no longer valid, can the Exterminationists produce ANY evidence -- a
photograph, document, plan or order -- showing that the supposed gas chamber
there was EVER used to kill people as alleged? Most likely not, but what
else is new? We've never been asked to accept the Holocaust story on
anything but faith, and for me, that's not good enough.

On the issue of the Holocaust -- and perhaps uniquely on this issue -- we
are told: "Close the books, there will be no more learning, no more
discussion, no more questions. Not only will no questions be tolerated, but
anyone who dares to ask such questions will be slandered and viciously
attacked."

Now, as someone who believes that part of being human is to learn something
new every day, I respond: "How dare you tell me there will be no more
learning?" The establishment that maintains the Holocaust story on life
support admits that there is no direct proof of homicidal gassings. No
order, no document, no pictures, only "eyewitnesses."

And what of these eyewitnesses? The Holocaust lobby insists that this is
convincing evidence. But what kind of evidence is this? In some European
countries, a person who denies the gas chambers can be jailed, fined, or
physically attacked. He might lose his job, his standing in the community,
maybe even his life. Something similar has happened in Canada. In the United
States, he might be attacked and vilified. And if he says that he comes by
his knowledge from first-hand experience -- in other words from helping to
run the camps during the war years -- then he might easily find himself
deported to Israel or eastern Europe, where he might be sentenced to death
or at least stripped of his US citizenship and denied due process.

In other words, we only hear of eyewitnesses from one side because witnesses
from the other side have been strong-armed into silence. This is
governmental coercion of the worst kind, and on a worldwide scale no less.
One kind of eyewitness is encouraged, the other kind if warned that his
words might lead to deportation, imprisonment, loss of livelihood, property,
and even life. Some great victory for the Holocaust lobby: The game has been
fixed!

Let people speak! If for no one else, I demand this for my own sake. I want
to know what happened during World War Two, and yet how can I if those who
might have firsthand knowledge are told: "Speak only the official line, or
suffer the consequences." I insist on my human right to learn.

There are those who say, "Okay, so maybe the Holocaust is a bit exaggerated,
but do we really want to destabilize society by openly talking about all
this, possibly encouraging hostility against Jews?" This raises an important
philosophical question: Do you believe mankind to be so inherently cruel and
stupid that people must be lied to in order to make them behave? If so, then
the lies you tell them are only a small bandage to cover up a much greater
evil: Lack of confidence in mankind's ability to handle the truth. And if
you truly believe that people cannot handle the truth, but instead need a
"Big Brother" to handle it for them, then surely democracy is the most
dangerous thing on earth.

Of course, I understand that people can be cruel and stupid, but I also
believe in the human ability to learn, and to grow with each new piece of
knowledge. Rather than censor information that we subjectively perceive to
be "dangerous," we should teach our children to think critically, to remain
open-minded, and to look for truth rather than cling to emotionally
appealing falsehoods.

And that is just about all we can do: teach our children and hope for the
best, realizing that people cannot be programmed like robots. Eighty years
of failed Communism should have taught us that. To use the power of the
state to force men to be what the state defines as "good" creates a world
far more hellish than the one that is supposedly being prevented. I would
rather live in a world where people are free to be cruel and stupid than one
in which "goodness" is enforced at gun point.

Keep in mind also that truth, objective truth, does not need threats and
intimidation to prevail. We Holocaust Revisionists are often likened to
those who said that the earth was flat. But just the reverse is true: It is
the other side that acts like a Holy Inquisition, institutionalizing one
viewpoint and punishing heretics. Remember: We only accepted that the earth
is round after the debate was opened. And since then, the round-earth
adherents have not needed false news laws, hate crimes laws, and libel or
slander laws to protect the truthfulness of their view. Likewise, all we ask
is that the Holocaust story either stand or fall according to the
evidence -- or lack of it.

While we Holocaust Revisionists sit on a wealth of wonderfully heretical
information, can we get it out to the general public? Can we "mainstream"
Holocaust Revisionism before it's too late, that is to say, before all those
who have firsthand information of what really happened die off entirely?

As a Jew, it would be wrong for me not to mention the issue of Jewish
influence. Influence is a very strange thing. People spend so much time and
energy to acquire it, and then an equal amount of time and energy denying
they have it. Jewish influence does exist. If it didn't, why would billions
of dollars be spent annually by Jewish lobbying groups? That money isn't to
pay for dance lessons for Senators and Congressmen, of course, it's for
influence. Jews must come to terms with the fact that they are not only a
powerful and influential group, but have responsibilities that come with
that -- particularly the responsibility not to abuse power, or, more
specifically, to avoid abusing people with that power.

It is a testament to the strength of Revisionist research and scholarship,
and to Revisionist tenacity, that all the Jewish influence in the world has
not erased this movement. Despite the best efforts of our most clever and
determined adversaries, Revisionist books are still read, and the Institute
for Historical Review continues to function.

But how much progress are we really making in getting our message to the
public? Unfortunately, we've been making only tiny, pussycat steps. I am not
a patient man. Every day, I fool myself into thinking that I can be
patient -- I can't. I don't want to be a guerrilla fighter of the political
underground for the rest of my life. The time has come, indeed has never
been better, to take Revisionist scholarship to the rest of the world, and
if the powers that be try to stop us, we either go around them or, if
necessary, we go right through them.
TWO MORE YEARS! That's my new motto. In two years' time, Holocaust
Revisionism should be in the mainstream, squarely in the public eye.

I am sure that we will eventually succeed in getting out our message.
Information can be suppressed for just so long. But that's not enough for
me. It's not enough that fellow Revisionists recognize Professor Faurisson's
scholarship for the brilliant work it is. I want it to be WIDELY recognized
as such, and in his lifetime!

So let's make a concerted effort. Mindful of the recent Jewish New Year, I
hereby make a Jewish New Year's resolution: Two more years! No more sitting
in the back of the ideological bus. We're loud, we're proud, and best of
all, we're right!

(Institute for Historical Review P.O. Box 2739 * Newport Beach, CA 92659.
Reprinted by permission from The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 13,
Number 2 (Mar./Apr. 1993): P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, USA).

Shekel coin and notes issued by 'Konzentrationslager' bank funded to over
M54 million.

Whitewashing Hitler
Taking the Gas Out of Nazi Infamy by Jim Redden

Some historians say Hitler had no master plan to exterminate the Jews in
World War II . . . But what are Nazis without the Holocaust?

Irving declares that he has never come across a document proving that Hitler
ordered the total eradication of European Jews.

October 16, 1992: David Irving, a British historian specializing in World
War II, is speaking at Mount Hood Community College near Portland, Oregon.
Irving is an advocate of Holocaust revisionism, a controversial movement
that disputes the historical accuracy of the widely held version of what
happened to European Jews at the hands of the Germans during Hitler's Third
Reich.

Police dressed in riot gear line the road that leads to the windowless
building where Irving is scheduled to talk. The police have been summoned to
protect people who wish to attend Irving's speech from an angry mob
harassing everyone who tries to enter the building. An elderly couple slips
through the corridor of Plexiglass shields held by police and reaches the
front doors. From the mob, a young man yells, "We know where you live!"

Shaken, the couple approaches a police officer stationed in the lobby. "They
said they know where we live," the man says in a quavering voice. The cop
answers coolly, "I'm sorry, sir, but there's nothing we can do about that,"
leaving the couple to wonder if a late-night fire bombing is the price they
will pay for attending a history lecture.

* * * *
At age 54, David Irving has authored more than a dozen books on World War
II. Unlike many chroniclers of the past, Irving does not rely on the
writings of other historians when researching his works, but insists on
seeing original documents whenever possible. According to the New York Times
Book Review, "Mr. Irving is an indefatigable interviewer, a prodigy of
enterprise and industry, a researcher who almost literally [leaves] no stone
unturned and [succeeds] in digging up papers, letters and diaries which
[are] believed to be lost or nonexistent, or which escaped, for other
reasons, earlier writers. His dogged persistence puts many professional
historians to shame."

After more than ten years researching declassified war records, Irving
declares that he has never come across a document proving that Hitler
ordered the total eradication of European Jews, no written or other
correspondence proving that Hitler was aware of concentration-camp gassings,
and no evidence that Hitler ordered the death of the Jews in any of the
top-secret Nazi radio transmissions that were intercepted by the Allies
during the war.

As a result of this research, Irving concluded that Hitler did not, in fact,
order the notorious Final Solution.

Irving calls the Holocaust a legend. "Historians have all been busy quoting
each other. They've been pumping hot air into this bubble, and the bubble
has been getting bigger and bigger and more and more unstable. These
professors know the truth, but they're terrified that some irresponsible
idiot is going to come along and prick that bubble. And," he adds with comic
timing, "I am that prick."

Mainstream historians acknowledge the lack of a documented Final Solution
order from Hitler, believing the Fuehrer was too shrewd to leave behind
palpable evidence of his evildoing.
"[That Hitler would not sign a written order] is hardly surprising
considering the monstrosity of the crimes being committed," notes British
historian Alan Bullock.

In May 1988 Irving provided expert testimony on behalf of Canadian Ernst
Zundel, who was charged with violating Canada's "false news" laws by
reprinting a 28-page booklet titled Did Six Million Really Die? Irving
produced a report prepared by Fred Leuchter, an American authority on gas
chambers who performed forensic tests on the gas chamber at Auschwitz.
Leuchter's report found no indication of traces of poisonous gas in the
walls of the gas chamber and alleged the chamber was, consequently, a fake.
Irving testified that there were no grounds to support the existence of a
Nazi plan to exterminate Jews. Upon returning to Europe, Irving published a
special edition of the Leuchter report, writing an introduction in which he
boldly dismissed the traditional version of the Holocaust as a
"well-financed and brilliantly successful postwar publicity campaign."
Publication of the Leuchter report in Europe led to Irving's arrest. By
alleging that the Auschwitz gas chamber was built AFTER the war, he was
convicted of a serious crime in Germany. In May 1992, a Munich court fined
Irving the equivalent of $7,000 for violating a German law against
"defamation of the memory of the dead."

* * * *
Books and pamphlets challenging various aspects of the Holocaust began to
appear shortly after the end of WWII. One of the first revisionist texts was
written by a French concentration-camp survivor named Paul Rassinier.
Rassinier's books, Le Mensonge d'Ulysse [The Lie of Ulysses], published in
1949, and Le Drame des Juifs Europeens [The Drama of the European Jews],
published in 1964, claimed Rassinier had not seen any evidence of the mass
gassings that had come to light after the camps were liberated.

(Dr. Arthur Butz argued that although Jews were persecuted by the Nazis,
they were not specifically targeted for mass extermination).

In the 1970s, Holocaust revisionism saw public debate in the United States.
In 1976, Dr. Arthur Butz, an American professor from Northwestern
University, published The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. Butz argued that
although Jews were persecuted by the Nazis, they were not specifically
targeted for mass extermination. According to Butz, less than half a million
people died in Nazi concentration camps during WWII, and only a fraction of
them were Jews.

Today, the central core of Holocaust revisionism in the U.S. is the
Institute for Historical Review (IHR) in Costa Mesa, California. Founded in
1979 by conspiracy theorist Willis Carto, the IHR largely functions as a
clearing house for a broad range of revisionist propaganda, including such
titles as Dealing in Hate: The Development of Anti-German Propaganda; My
Father, Rudolph Hess; and Auschwitz: Truth or Lie -- An Eyewitness Report.
The IHR also holds annual conferences at which Irving and other revisionists
present their latest findings. The definition of the term HOLOCAUST lies at
the heart of the revisionism controversy. Since WWII, the expression has
been used to describe a systematic Nazi effort -- either originating with
Hitler or approved by him -- to exterminate all of Europe's Jews. Commonly
known as the Final Solution, the plan is thought to have culminated in the
construction and operation of the gas chambers at Nazi concentration camps.

Opponents of Holocaust revisionism -- those who embrace the traditional
version of the war (the American Jewish Committee [AJC] and the
Anti-Defamation League [ADL] in particular) -- consider the fight against
Holocaust revisionism a crusade against a growing army of neo-Nazis around
the world. In a series of extensively researched briefing papers, the AJC
and the ADL argue that Hitler's dream of an Aryan world did not die with
him, but comprises a conspiracy that stretches from the U.S. to Europe and
the Middle East. They refer to their opponents not as Holocaust
revisionists, but Holocaust DENIERS.

"The movement to deny that six million Jews were exterminated by the Nazis
during World War II is a weapon of anti-Semitic extremist groups operating
in the United States and abroad," claims the ADL.

Jewish advocacy groups and their supporters admit that legitimate Holocaust
reappraisal has occurred since the end of WWII. For example, it was widely
assumed after the war that 2.5 million Jews were gassed to death at
Auschwitz alone. Recently Yahuda Bauer, the director of the Division of
Holocaust Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem's Institute of
Contemporary Jewry, announced that the actual number was probably closer to
1.35 million.

Though this revision raises questions about the total number of Jews killed
by the Nazis, the questions raised by Holocaust revisionists are seen as
part of a larger agenda of discrimination.

Irving denies that his views on the Holocaust are anti-Semitic.

"The revisionist scene [incorporates] people from the field of history, like
myself, to people who are at the other end of the spectrum, who find in
revisionism a [means] to vent their anti-Semitism," he explains.

Holocaust revisionism is a common link between many overtly racist and
anti-Semitic groups, such as the California-based White Aryan Resistance,
which produces a cable-access television show called RACE AND REASON.

Some viewers claimed to be offended by an early episode of the program that
opened with canned laughter playing behind WWII film footage of corpses at
Nazi concentration camps.
But support for Holocaust revisionism comes from pro-Semitic sides as well.
A young Jew named David Cole visited Auschwitz in late 1992 and videotaped
an interview with Dr. Franciszek Piper, the curator of the Holocaust museum
at the camp.

In the interview, Piper admitted that the gas chamber shown to tourists was
remodeled by the Soviets after the war. In Cole's view, this statement
confirms Irving's support of the Leuchter Report.

Mainstream historians supporting the traditional version of the Holocaust
point to an abundance of eyewitness accounts and Nazi confessions collected
during numerous war-crimes trials. At the International Military Tribunal,
otherwise known as the Nuremberg Trial, Auschwitz commander Rudolf Hess
testified that he personally arranged the gassing of two million Jews
between June 1941 and the end of 1943.

(Revisionists argue that the Germans, obsessive insect-haters, shipped large
quantities of Zyklon-B to concentration camps during the war to kill lice).
"There's no doubt that the Germans did kill thousands of people,
machine-gunning them into pits," says Irving. "But I don't believe they
planned and installed factories of death with gas chambers."

* * * *
The presence of gas chambers at several Nazi concentration camps is the most
incriminating evidence of Hitler's genocidal intent. Unsuspecting Jews were
tricked into entering the deadly chambers, usually under the pretext that
the rooms were large showers. Once the doors locked behind them, poisonous
gas spewed out of the shower heads, killing great numbers in a matter of
minutes. The bodies were then hauled out, and either burned in adjacent
crematoriums or dumped into pits. According to eyewitness accounts and Nazi
testimony, this process was repeated until millions of Jews had been gassed.

Physical evidence of gas-chamber extermination is hard to come by.
Mainstream historians agree that the Germans installed gas chambers at only
seven camps in Poland -- Auschwitz (and its satellite facility, Birkenau),
Stutthof, Treblinka, Chelmno, Sobibor, Majdanek, and Belzec. All of these
camps were liberated by Soviet troops, and Poland became part of the Soviet
Union after the war. The result was that during the long decades of the Cold
War, the camps and the tons of documents captured by the Russians have been
restricted from Western researchers.

Most of the concentration camps were destroyed by the Germans before they
fell into Soviet hands. Many of the buildings were blown up, including those
that reportedly housed the gas chambers.

Today, the only gas chambers extant are found at Auschwitz, Birkenau and
Majdanek. Basic operating equipment is missing at all of the facilities.
None of the chambers currently have air-tight doors, venting systems for
piping gas or exhaust systems for removing the gas after the victims have
been killed.

Historians agree that the gas chambers used a cyanide-based insecticide
called Zyklon-B. Revisionists argue that the Germans, obsessive
insect-haters, shipped large quantities of Zyklon-B to concentration camps
during the war to kill lice and other insects. Delousing rooms, the doubters
point out, can still be found at many of the camps.

More scientifically minded revisionists argue that Zyklon-B does not vanish
without a trace, but bonds permanently with porous surfaces like bricks and
mortar. According to Rick Gates, a chemist with the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality who is not involved in the revisionist debate,
"Cyanide traces can remain in [such materials] a long time."
Acting on this scientific principle, Fred Leuchter and several companions
traveled to Poland in 1988, where they took samples from the walls and
floors of the gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek. According to
the Leuchter report, only minimal traces of cyanide could be found in the
gas chambers. This shortage of forensic evidence leads Leuchter to conclude
that the rooms could not have been used as gas chambers, and revisionists
take this as proof that the gas chamber story is a hoax.

Jean-Claude Pressac, author of Auschwitz: Design and Fabrication of the Gas
Chambers, refutes Leuchter's theory, alleging that the Germans used enough
Zyklon-B to kill people, but not enough to leave substantial traces.

Pressac, a French pharmacist, uses complex chemical formulas to prove that
traces of cyanide would be found in the delousing rooms, but not in the gas
chambers.

"A hydrocyanic gas concentration of 0.3 grams per cubic meter -- a lethal
dose -- is immediately fatal to a man, while killing lice requires a
concentration of five grams per cubic meter for a period of at least two
hours," claims Pressac. "Maintaining that concentration for six hours will
kill [every insect infesting a person]. The dose used at Birkenau was lethal
40 to 70 times over (12 to 20 grams per cubic inch) -- which infallibly
killed 1,000 persons in less than five minutes."

Without a master plan to eradicate Europe's Jewry, the revisionists argue,
the Nazis were no worse than many other military aggressors in recorded
history. "The killings [perpetrated by the Nazis], the pits and so on, were
no worse than what the Americans did in Vietnam in My Lai," claims Irving,
referring to the March 16, 1968, slaughter by American ground troops of
nearly 300 unarmed and unresisting Vietnam civilians, many of whom were
forced to stand on the edge of a ditch and machine-gunned. "There are
eyewitness descriptions of both. But the idea of setting up killing
factories, with the gas chambers and so on, implies a certain degree of
industrialization and precision that, frankly, I don't think [belongs] in
the record."
Jewish advocacy organizations are not willing to be drawn into a public
debate with Holocaust revisionists. They contend that the Holocaust is not a
matter to be argued and that, for the sake of the memories of countless
families whose relations perished at Nazi hands, the claims of the
revisionists should not be dignified with public responses. "We need not
waste time or reffort answering the deniers' contentions," states Jewish
historian Deborah Lipstadt. "It would be never-ending to respond to
arguments posed by those who freely falsify findings, quote out of context
and simply dismiss reams of testimony. Their commitment is to an ideology,
and their 'findings' are shaped to support it."

The AJC and the ADL routinely publish and distribute the results of lengthy
background checks indicating that revisionists are not merely disinterested
academics, but anti-Semitic political activists.

The ADL has identified former Institute for Historical Review director David
McCalden as the founder of the British National Party, an offshoot of the
neo-Nazi National Front, and reports that revisionist writer Arthur Butz
addressed the 1985 convention of the Nation of Islam, led by notorious
anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan.

Irving has a proposal for settling the controversy: a full enquiry. Says
Irving, "I think it would be most satisfactory if the Jews themselves
investigated and discarded the legend [of the Final Solution], because any
other solution is going to lead to an increase in anti-Semitism. The world
will say, 'Look how they tried to get away with it for 50 years!'"
From Hustler magazine, August 1993:

Revisionists Challenge Extermination Story

THE HOLOCAUST: Let's Hear Both Sides by Mark Weber
Just about everyone has heard that the Germans killed some six million Jews
in Europe during the Second World War. American television, motion pictures,
newspapers and magazines hammer away on this theme. In Washington, DC, an
enormous offical Holocaust Museum is being built.

Scholars Challenge Holocaust Story

During the past decade, though, more and more "Revisionist" historians,
including respected scholars such as Dr. Arthur Butz of Northwestern
University, Prof. Robert Faurisson of the Univeristy of Lyon in France and
best-selling British historian David Irving, have been vigorously
challenging the widely-accepted extermination story. They do not dispute the
fact that large numbers of Jews were deported to concentration camps and
ghettos, or that many Jews died or were killed during the Second World War.
Revisionist scholars have, however, presented considerable evidence to show
that there was no German program to exterminate Europe's Jews and that the
estimate of six million Jewish wartime dead is an irresponsible
exaggeration.

Many Holocaust Claims Abandoned
Revisionists point out that the Holocaust story has changed quite a lot over
the years. Many extermination camps that were once widely accepted have been
quitely dropped in recent years. At one time it was alleged that the Germans
gassed Jews at Dachau, Buchenwald and other concentration camps in Germany
proper. That part of the extermination story proved so untenable that it was
abandoned more than twenty years ago. No serious historian now supports the
once supposedly proven story of "extermination camps" in the territory of
the old German Reich. Even famed "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal acknowledged
in 1975 that "there were no extermination camps on German soil." ('Books &
Bookmen', London, April 1975, p.5). Prominent Holocaust historians now claim
that masses of Jews were gassed at just six camps in what is now Poland:
Auschwitz, Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor, Chelmno and Belzec. However, the
"evidence presented for "gassings" at these six camps is not qualitatively
different than the "evidence" for alleged "gassings" at the camps in Germany
proper. At the great Nuremberg trial of 1945-1946 and during the decades
following the end of the Second World War, Auschwitz (especially
Auschwitz-Birkenau) and Majdanek (Lublin) were generally regarded as the
really important "death camps."

For example, the Allies alleged at Nuremberg that the Germans killed four
million at Auschwitz and another 1.5 million at Majdanek. Today, no
reputable historian accepts these fantastic figures. In addition, more and
more striking evidence has been presented in recent years which simply
cannot be reconciled with the allegations of mass exterminations at these
camps.

For example, detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of
Auschwitz-Birkenau on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the
alleged extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979.
They show no trace of the piles of corpses, smoking chimneys and masses of
Jews awaiting death, all of which have been alleged and would have been
clearly visible if Auschwitz had indeed been an extermination center. We now
also know that the postwar "confessions" of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf
Hess, which is a crucial part of the Holocaust extermination story, was
obtained by torture. (Rupert Butler, "Legions of Death" (England: 1983), pp.
235-237, and R. Faurisson, "Journal of Historical Review", Winter 1986-1987,
pp. 389-403.)

Other Absurd Holocaust Claims
At one time it was also seriously claimed that the Germans exterminated Jews
with electricity and steam, and that they manufactured soap from Jewish
corpses. For example, at Nuremberg the United States charged that the
Germans killed Jews at Treblinka, not in gas chambers, as is now claimed,
but by steaming them to death in "steam chambers" (Nuremberg document
PS-3311 (USA-293). IMT blue series, Vol. 32, pp. 153-158; IMT, Vol 3, pp.
566-568.; NMT green series, Vol. 5, pp. 1133, 1134.) These bizarre stories
have also been quietly abandoned in recent years.

Disease Claimed Many Inmates
The Holocaust extermination story is superficially plausible. Everyone has
seen the horrific photos of dead and dying inmates taken at Bergen-Belsen,
Nordhausen and other concentration camps when they were liberated by British
and American forces in the final weeks of the war in Europe. These people
were unfortunate victims, not of an extermination program, but of disease
and malnutrition brought on by the complete collapse of Germany in the final
months of the war. Indeed, if there had been an extermination program, the
Jews found by Allied forces at the end of the war would have long since been
killed. In the face of the advancing Soviet forces, large numbers of Jews
were evacuated during the final months of the war from eastern camps and
ghettos to the remaining camps in western Germany. These camps quickly
became terribly overcrowded, which severely hampered efforts to prevent the
spread of epidemics. Furthermore, the breakdown of the German transportation
system made it impossible to supply adequate food and medicine to the camps.
Captured German Documents

At the end of the Second World Wa
r, the Allies confiscated a tremendous quantity of German documents dealing
with Germany's wartime Jewish policy, which was sometimes officially
referred to as the "final solution." But not a single German document has
ever been found which even refers to an extermination program. To the
contrary, the documents clearly show that the German "final solution" policy
was one of emigration and deportation, not extermination. Consider, for
example, the confidential German Foreign Office memorandum of August 21,
1942 (Nuremberg document NG-2586-J. NMT green series, Vol. 13, pp. 243-249).
"The present war gives Germany the opportunity and also the duty of solving
the Jewish problem in Europe," the memorandum notes. The policy "to promote
the evacuation of the Jews (from Europe) in closest cooperation with the
agencies of the Reichsfuhrer SS [Himmler] is still in force." The memo noted
that "the number of Jews deported in this way to the East did not suffice to
cover the labor needs." The document quotes German Foreign Minister von
Ribbentrop as saying that "at the end of this war, all Jews would have to
leave Europe. This was an unalterable decision of the Fuhrer [Hitler] and
also the only way to master this problem, as only a global and comprehensive
solution could be applied and individual measures would not help very much."
The memorandum concludes by stating that the "deportations [of Jews to the
East] are a further step on the way to the total solution . . . The
deportation to the [Polish] General Government is a temporary measure. The
Jews will be moved on further to the occupied [Soviet] eastern territories
as soon as the technical conditions for it are given." This unambiguous
document, and others like it, are routinely suppressed or ignored by those
who uphold the Holocaust extermination story.

Unreliable Testimony
Holocaust historians rely heavily on so-called "survivor testimony" to
support the extermination story. But such "evidence" is notoriously
unreliable. As one Jewish historian has pointed out, "most of the memoirs
and reports [of "Holocaust survivors"] are full of preposterous verbosity,
graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation,
dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias,
partisan attacks and apologies." (Samuel Gringauz in "Jewish Social Studies"
(New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65)
Hitler and the "Final Solution"

There is no documentary evidence that Adolf Hitler ever gave an order to
exterminate the Jews, or that he knew of any extermination program. Instead,
the record shows that the German leader wanted the Jews to leave Europe, by
emigration if possible and by deportation if necessary. A document found
after the war in the files of the Reich Ministry of Justice records his
thinking on the Jews. In the spring of 1942, State Secretary Franz
Schlegelberger noted in a memorandum that Hitler's Chief of Chancellery, Dr.
Hans Lammers, had informed him: "The Fuhrer has repeatedly declared to him
[Lammers] that he wants to see the solution of the Jewish problem postponed
until after the war is over." (Nuremberg document PS-4025. D. Irving,
"Goering: A biography" (New York: 1989) p. 349.) And on July 24, 1942,
Hitler emphasized his determination to remove all Jews from Europe after the
war: "The Jews are interested in Europe for economic reasons, but Europe
must reject them, if only out of self-interest, becuase the Jews are
racially tougher. After this war is over, I will rigorously hold to the view
. . . that the Jews will have to leave and emigrate to Madagascar or some
other Jewish national state." (H. Picker, "Hitlers Tischgesprsche im
Fuhrerhauptquartier" (Stuttgart: 1976), p. 456).

"Starving" Jewish prisoners at Stammlag 'Konzentrationslager' Camp.
Himmler's SS and the Camps
Jews were an important part of Germany's wartime labor force, and it was in
Germany's interest to keep them alive. The head of the SS camp
administration office sent a directive dated Dec. 28, 1942, to every
concentration camp, including Auschwitz. It sharply criticized the high
death rate of inmates due to disease, and ordered that "camp physicians must
use all means at their disposal to significantly reduce the death rate in
the various camps." Furthermore, it ordered: "The camp doctors must
supervise more often than in the past the nutrition of the prisoners and, in
cooperation with the administration, submit improvement recommendations to
the camp commandants. . . The camp doctors are to see to it that the working
conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as possible."
Finally, the directive stressed that "The Reichsfuhrer SS [Heinrich Himmler]
has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced." (Nuremberg
document PS-2171, Annex 2; NC&A red series, Vol. 4, pp. 833-834). The head
of the SS department that supervised the concentration camps, Richard
Glucks, sent a circular letter to each camp commandant dated January 20,
1943. In it he ordered: "As I have already pointed out, every means must be
used to lower the death rate in the camp." (Nuremberg document NO-1523; NMT
green series, Vol. 5, pp. 372-373)
Six Million?

There is no real evidence for the incessantly repeated claim that the German
exterminated six million Jews. It is clear, though, that millions of Jews
"survived" German rule during the Second World War, including many who were
interned in Auschwitz and other so-called "extermination camps." This fact
alone should raise serious doubts about the extermination story. A leading
newspaper of neutral Switzerland, the daily "Baseler Nachrichten", carefully
estimated in June 1946 that no more than 1.5 million European Jews could
have perished under German rule during the war ("Baseler Nachrichten", June
13, 1946, p.2).

One-Sided "Holocaustomania"
Even after more than forty years, the stream of Holocaust films and books
shows no sign of diminishing. This relentless media campaign, which Jewish
historian Alfred Lilienthal calls "Holocaustomania," portrays the fate of
the Jews during the Second World War as the central event of history. There
is no end to the heavy-handed motion pictures, the simplistic television
specials, the vindictive hunt for "Nazi-war criminals," the one-sided
"educational courses," and the self-righteous appearances by politicans and
celebrities at Holocaust "memorial services." Britain's chief rabbi,
Immanuel Jakobovits, has accurately described the Holocaust campaign as "an
entire industry, with handsome profits for writers, researchers,
film-makers, monument builders, museum planners and even politicians." He
added that some rabbis and theologians are "partners in this big business."
(H. Shapiro, "Jakobovits," 'Jerusalem Post' (Israel), Nov. 26, 1987, p.1)
Non-Jewish victims just don't merit the same concern. For example, there are
no American memorials, "study centers," or annual observances for Stalin's
victims, who vastly outnumber Hitler's.

Who Benefits?
The perpetual Holocaust media blitz is routinely used to justify enormous
American support for Israel and to excuse otherwise inexcusable Israeli
policies, even when they conflict with American interests. The sophisticated
and well-financed Holocaust media campaign is crucially important to the
intersts of Israel, which owes its existence to massive annual subsidies
from American taxpayers. As Prof. W. D. Rubinstein of Australia has candidly
acknowledged: "If the Holocaust can be shown to be a 'Zionist myth,' the
strongest of all weapons in Israel's propaganda armory collapses."
("Quadrant" (Australia), Sept. 1979, p.27).

Jewish history teacher Paula Hyman of Columbia University has observed:
"With regard to Israel, the Holocuast may be used to forestall political
criticism and suppress debate; it reinforces the sense of Jews as an
eternally beleaguered people who can rely for their defense only upon
themselves. The invocation of the suffering endured by the Jews under the
Nazis often takes the place of rational argument, and is expected to
convince doubters of the legitimacy of current Israeli government policy."
('New York Times Magazine', Sept. 14, 1980, p. 79). One major reason that
the Holocuast story has proven so durable is that the government of the
major powers also have a vested interest in maintaining it. The victorious
powers of the Second World War -- the United States, the Soviet Union and
Britian -- have a stake in portraying the defeated Hitler regime as
negatively as possible. The more evil and satanic the Hitler regime appears,
the more noble and justified seems the Allied cause. For many Jews, the
Holocaust has become both a flourishing buisness and a kind of new religion,
as noted Jewish author and newspaper publisher Jacobo Timerman points out in
his book, 'The Longest War.' He reports that many Israelis, using the word
Shoah, which is Hebrew for Holocaust, joke that "There's no business like
Shoah business." ('The Longest War', (New York: Vintage, 1982), p. 15). The
Holocaust media campaign portrays Jews as totally innocent victims, and
non-Jews as mortally retarded and unreliable beings who can easily turn into
murderous Nazis under the right circumstances. This self-serving but
distorted portrayal greatly strengthens Jewish group solidarity and
self-awareness. A key lesson of the Holocaust story for Jews is that
non-Jews are never completely trustworthy. If a people as cultured and as
educated as the Germans could turn against the Jews, so the thinking goes,
than surely no non-Jewish nation can ever be completely trusted. The
Holocaust message is thus one of contempt for humanity.

Holocaust Hatemongering
The Holocaust story is sometimes ued to promote hatred and hostility,
particularly against the German people as a whole, eastern Europeans and the
leadership of the Roman Catholic church. The well-known Jewish writer, Elie
Wiesel, is a former Auschwitz inmate who served as chairman of the offical
U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council. He recieved the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize.
This dedicated Zionist wrote in his book, 'Legends of Our Time': "Every Jew,
somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate -- healthy, virile
hate -- for what the German personifies and for what persists in the
German." ('Legends of Our Time' (New York: Schocken Books, 1982) chap. 12,
p. 142).

Let Both Sides Be Heard
For several years now, the Holocaust story has been the subject of
legitimate controversy in Europe. It was debated for several hours on Swiss
television and over French national radio. The respected Italian historical
journal "Storia Illustrata" has given extensive coverage to both sides of
this issue. Here in America, though, powerful organizations have so far
prevented any real public exchange of views on this issue. Many thoughtful
Americans are having growing doubts about at least some of the more
sensational Holocaust claims, but all the public ever sees and hears is the
orthodox view of the extermination story. That's not right. Americans have
the right to judge this important issue for themselves.

In summation:
The Holocaust extermination story is breaking down as suppressed evidence
becomes better known, and as more people become aware of the facts about
what is certainly the most hyped and politicized chapter of modern history.
Artificially maintaining the hatreds and passions of the past prevents
genuine reconciliation and lasting peace. Revisionism promotes histiorical
awareness and international understanding. That's why the work of the
Institute for Historical Review is so important and deserves your support.

About the Author:
Mark Weber is editor of the 'IHR Newsletter' and associate editor of the
'Journal of Historical Review', both published by the Institute for
Historical Review. He studied history at the University of Illinois
(Chicago), the University of Munich, Portland state University, and Indiana
University (M.A., 1977). For five days in March 1988, he testified as a
recognized expert witness on the "Final Solution" and the Holocaust issue in
a Toronto District Court case. He is the aurthor of many published articles,
reviews and essays on various aspects of modern European history.
Institute for Historical Review P.O.Box 2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659

66 Questions on the Holocaust

1. What proof exists that the Nazis practiced genocide or deliberately
killed six million. Jews?
2. What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis?
3. Did Simon Wiesenthal once state in writing that "there were no
extermination camps on German soil?
4. If Dachau was in Germany and even Simon Wiesenthal says that it was not
an extermination camp, why do thousands of veterans in America say that it
was an extermination camp?
5. Auschwitz was in Poland, not Germany. Is there any proof that gas
chambers for the purpose of killing human beings existed at or in Auschwitz?
6. If Auschwitz wasn't a "death camp," what was it's true purpose?
7. Who set up the first concentration camps, and where and when?
8. How did German concentration camps differ from America relocation camps
which interned Japanese-German-and Italian-Americans during W.W.II?
9. Why did the German intern Jews in concentration camps?
10. What extensive measure did world Jewry undertake against Germany as
early as 1933?
11. Did the Jews of the world "declare war on Germany?"
12. Was this before or after the rumors of the "death camps" began?
13. What nation is credited with being the first to practice mass civilian
bombing?
14. How many gas chambers to kill people were there at Auschwitz?
15. How many Jews were in areas that came to be controlled by the Germans
before the war?
16. If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis, what happened
to them?
17. How many Jews fled to deep within the Soviet Union?
18. How many Jews emigrated prior to the war, thus being outside of German
reach?
19. If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did the commandant,
Rudolf Hoess, confess that it was?
20. Is there any evidence that it was American, British, French, and Soviet
policy to torture German prisoners in order to exact confessions before the
trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere?
21. How does the "Holocaust" story benefit the Jews today?
22. How does it benefit the State of Israel?
23. How does it benefit many Christian clergy?
24. How does it benefit the Communists?
25. How does it benefit Britain?
26. Is there any evidence that Hitler knew of a mass extermination of Jews?
27. What kind of gas was used by the Nazis in concentration camps?
28. For what purpose was, and is, this gas manufactured?
29. Why did they use this instead of a gas more suitable for mass
extermination?
30. How long does it take to ventilate fully an area fumigated by Zyklon-B?
31. Auschwitz commandant Hoess said that his men would enter the gas chamber
ten minutes after the Jews had died and remove them. How do you explain
this?
32. Hoess said in his confession that his men would smoke cigarettes as they
pulled the dead Jews out of the gas chambers ten minutes after gassing.
Isn't Zyklon-B explosive?
33. What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used to exterminate
Jews?
34. How could such a mass program have been kept secret from Jews who were
scheduled for extermination?
35. If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store for them, why did
they go to their deaths without fight or protest?
36. About how many Jews died in the concentration camps?
37. How did they die?
38. What is typhus?
39. What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews died during this
awesome period?
40. Many Jewish survivors of the "death camps" say they saw bodies being
piled up in pits and burned. How much gasoline would have to be used to
perform this?
41. Can bodies be burned in pits?
42. "Holocaust" authors claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in
about 10 minutes. How long does it take to incinerate one body according to
professional cremator operators?
43. Why did the concentration camps have crematory ovens?
44. Given a 100 (to the 6th power) duty cycle of all the crematoria in all
the camps in German-controlled territory, what is the maximum number of
corpses it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire period
such cremators were operating?
45. Can a crematory oven be operated 100 (to the 6th power) of the time?
46. How much ash is left from a cremated corpse?
47. If six million people had been incinerated by the Nazis, what happened
to the ashes?
48. Do Allied wartime photos of Auschwitz (during the period when the "gas
chambers" and crematoria were supposed to be in full operation) reveal gas
chambers?
49. What was the main provision of the German "Nuremberg laws" of 1935?
50. Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws?
51. What did the International Red Cross have to report with regard to the
"Holocaust" question?
52. What was the role of the Vatican during the time the six million Jews
were alleged to have been exterminated?
53. What evidence is there that Hitler knew of the ongoing Jewish
extermination?
54. Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate?
55. What caused Anne Frank's death just several weeks before the end of the
war?
56. Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine?
57. What about the numerous photographs and footage taken in the German
concentration camps showing piles of emaciated corpses? Are these faked?
58. Who originated the term "genocide"?
59. Were films such as 'Holocaust' and 'The Winds of War' documentary films?
60. About how many books have been published which refute some aspect of the
standard claims made about the "Holocaust"?
61. What happened when a historical institute offered $50,000 to anyone who
could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?
62. What about the claim that those who question the "Holocaust" are
anti-Semitic or Neo-Nazi?
63. What has happened to the historians who have questioned the "Holocaust"
material?
64. Has the Institute for Historical Review suffered any retaliation for its
efforts to uphold the right of freedom of speech and academic freedom?
65. Why is there so little publicity for your point of view?
66. Where can I get more information about the "other side" of the
"Holocaust" story as well as facts concerning other areas of W.W.II
Historical Revisionism?

[Gord McFee]

On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:04:45 +1000, in
<c9SdnQ0n7MSlJmfU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
<ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:

> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?

No.

--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time

Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org

[B.H. Cramer]

"Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:bjoov4lmgo0j4f01r...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:04:45 +1000, in
> <c9SdnQ0n7MSlJmfU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
> <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>
>> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>
> No.

Balls it isn't.

[Gord McFee]

On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:29:17 +1000, in
<XZadnawwr9xH-2HU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
<ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:

> "Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:bjoov4lmgo0j4f01r...@4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:04:45 +1000, in
> > <c9SdnQ0n7MSlJmfU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
> > <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
> >
> > No.
>
> Balls it isn't.

It isn't.

[B.H. Cramer]

"Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message

news:qf9sv4ltapqg7574v...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:29:17 +1000, in
> <XZadnawwr9xH-2HU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
> <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>
>> "Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
>> news:bjoov4lmgo0j4f01r...@4ax.com...
>> > On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:04:45 +1000, in
>> > <c9SdnQ0n7MSlJmfU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
>> > <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>> >
>> > No.
>>
>> Balls it isn't.
>
> It isn't.

That's one opinion. Held by a minority, I might add.

[Gord McFee]

On 5/3/2009 7:50 PM, B.H. Cramer wrote:

> "Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:qf9sv4ltapqg7574v...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:29:17 +1000, in
>> <XZadnawwr9xH-2HU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
>> <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
>>> news:bjoov4lmgo0j4f01r...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:04:45 +1000, in
>>>> <c9SdnQ0n7MSlJmfU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
>>>> <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>> Balls it isn't.
>>>
>> It isn't.
>
> That's one opinion. Held by a minority, I might add.

It is a fact, accepted by almost everyone.

[B.H. Cramer]

"Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message

news:fkMLl.274504$UQ6.1...@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com...

> On 5/3/2009 7:50 PM, B.H. Cramer wrote:
>
>> "Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
>> news:qf9sv4ltapqg7574v...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:29:17 +1000, in
>>> <XZadnawwr9xH-2HU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
>>> <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:bjoov4lmgo0j4f01r...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:04:45 +1000, in
>>>>> <c9SdnQ0n7MSlJmfU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
>>>>> <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
>>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>> Balls it isn't.
>>>>
>>> It isn't.
>>
>> That's one opinion. Held by a minority, I might add.
>
> It is a fact, accepted by almost everyone.

You are so wrong it is not at all funny, old feller. You need to take
yourself down from your ivory tower and start social intercourse with the
common people, gourd. You know - the oiks. The plebians. We filthy goyim.

[Gord McFee]

On Tue, 5 May 2009 12:58:16 +1000, in
<3JidnazLi8bRNmLU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
<ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:

> "Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:fkMLl.274504$UQ6.1...@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com...
> > On 5/3/2009 7:50 PM, B.H. Cramer wrote:
> >
> >> "Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
> >> news:qf9sv4ltapqg7574v...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:29:17 +1000, in
> >>> <XZadnawwr9xH-2HU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
> >>> <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:bjoov4lmgo0j4f01r...@4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:04:45 +1000, in
> >>>>> <c9SdnQ0n7MSlJmfU...@giganews.com>, "B.H. Cramer"
> >>>>> <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> No.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Balls it isn't.
> >>>>
> >>> It isn't.
> >>
> >> That's one opinion. Held by a minority, I might add.
> >
> > It is a fact, accepted by almost everyone.
>
> You are so wrong it is not at all funny, old feller. You need to take
> yourself down from your ivory tower and start social intercourse with the
> common people, gourd. You know - the oiks. The plebians. We filthy goyim.

Dream on, Ben. It's all you have.

[B.H. Cramer]

"Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message

news:r0r105pm83nnscsov...@4ax.com...

Not so, gourd. Not even close.

You lot are in trouble and you know it. Your Holocaust(tm) thingie is
unravelling before your very eyes and you do not like it one bit. All those
years of propping it up and defending the indefensible has been to no avail.

Truth is always victorious, old feller.

[Truthseeker]

Hoax or not they just want us not to see or hear all the facts.
Kurt Knoll.

"B.H. Cramer" <ben_a...@beltingyids.com> wrote in message
news:a-2dnc0w2KWcc53X...@giganews.com...

[I'll Always Be 6/05/09]

In article
<dDaMl.25828$Db2.1056@edtnps83>,
"Truthseeker" <kur...@citywest.ca>
wrote:

> Hoax or not they just want us not to see or hear all the facts.

Did 45000 people die in a single air
raid on Nuremberg?

[ ] yes

[ ] no

Please choose one.

Did people wear shoes with plastic soles
during WW2?

[ ] yes

[ ] no

Please choose one.

[Kenneth McVay OBC]

In article <dDaMl.25828$Db2.1056@edtnps83>,
The hapless Intellectual Giant of Holocaust Revisionism,
Kurt Knoll, reigning Village Idiot of Kitimat and Laughing
Stock of UseNet, fluffed his Chicken Yellow Hitler Jugend

Tutu with the "keiner da" Cross and <kur...@citywest.ca> wrote:

>Hoax or not they just want us not to see or hear all the facts.

You will not tell us how many people died during a single raid on
Nuremberg. How can we know the facts if you refuse to reveal them?

None of your fabrications, now, just the truth!

YOU have yet to prove that there are Holocaust victims' shoes
with soles made of plastic, as you claimed on April 3, 2009. You
were lying.

YOU have yet to prove that the Yale University Law "Avalon Project"
is "Jewish," as you claimed in August, 2008.

YOU have yet to prove that "Gussen was a regional crematorium
and therefore also included civilian death from this area," as you
claimed on July 3, 2008.

YOU have yet to prove that "the Germans killed more Jews
that were ever alive" as you claimed on June 28, 2008

YOU have yet to prove that reporters or photographers carried
"5 or 6" striped inmate uniforms from concentration camp to
concentration camp just to photograph people wearing them,
as you have claimed.

YOU have yet to prove that (1) human fat will not combust, and
(2) contribute to the heat of the cremation process, as you
have claimed.

YOU have failed to prove the existence of a single "Eisenhower
death camp," as you have claimed, and you have ignored the fact
that the German Government itself has said that Bacque's
assertions about hundreds of thousands of German soldiers being
deliberately starved to death is absolute rubbish.

YOU have failed to document that concentration camp guards -
ANY concentration camp guards - were ever placed under any
sort of "gag order" by anyone, as you have claimed, nor have you
been able to produce this alleged "gag order," or point to any
archive, anywhere in the world, where it might be found.

YOU have failed to prove your incredibly stupid assertion that
45,000 people died during the bombing of Nurnberg as you have claimed.

YOU have failed to prove your bizarre assertion that someone,
somewhere, said that the Germans killed prisoners at Mauthausen
as soon as they arrived by train, as you have claimed.

YOU have yet to show which clause of the Versailles Treaty, exactly,
prohibits the construction of Polish military installations along
the Polish Corridor, even though you claim such a prohibition exists
within the treaty.

YOU have failed to produce any "agreement" between the Allies and the
post-war German government that banned "butting" the Allies in "a bad
light" as you have claimed.

YOU have not contacted European universities to determine whether or not
materials you claim are "banned," as you have claimed, are available.

YOU have not documented a single law that banned publication of newspapers
printed between 1918 and 1939, as you have claimed.

YOU have not contacted the IFZ to ask them to document their claim about
gassings at Dachau.

YOU cannot produce a shred of documentation proving that a plaque exists
outside the Dachau camp which states that no one was ever gassed there,
as you have claimed.

YOU have not documented a single law which bans "discussion of the
Holocaust," or "asking questions about the Holocaust," as you have
claimed.

THAT is why your claim that you are here to "find out the truth" is so
easily revealed as a blatant lie.

YOU have not documented or identified a single law which forbids
"dissection" of Holocaust historiography, as you have claimed.

--
"Rumours also has it the letter was written on an unknown typewriter
in about 1950 but the letter was send to the state department about in 1940."
(Message-ID: m7_Ah.1010750$R63.692769@pd7urf1no, by Kurt Knoll, Kitimat,
B.C.'s Leading Revisionist Scholar)