On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:47 AM Saeed Norouzi <
norou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Christoph,
> Thank you so much for your help. I used the <table_begin> and <table_end> in my setting file, and now it works. Could I also do the extrapolation on my target distribution, so I do not have to do it for every iteration and remove this interaction-specific from the setting file?
That might work, but I am not sure! The problem with poorly sampled
regions in IBI is that they can lead to systematic errors in the
update.
> Also, How could I have other than linear extrapolation for my data?
Yes, there should be an option,
inverse.lammps.table_left_exprapolation for each interaction (and same
for right), options are constant, linear, quadratic, exponential and
sasha. See "csg_call potential extrapolate --help" and "csg_call table
extrapolate --help" for details.
> Moreover, as you can see below, I have dihedral interaction in my settings file and I am trying to do ibi for this part also. but the problem is the VOTCA gives the potential file for dihedral in radian units not degree. I am using lammps and I need to have the table function in degree units, as VOTCA does for angle potential. Can you please help me out with this?
Dihedrals are not fully implemented yet. But I think you could set
inverse.lammps.scale to 180/pi=57.295 for that interaction.
Christoph
> To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/CAJZjMJbERZcwt5CDFXznUw83UYwFiLGTLFjWeXm%2BpTm2mjQwzw%40mail.gmail.com.