Depends on how you define "full featured". There are always more
things to do: more kinds of integrals to compute, more kinds of
equations to solve, more areas of mathematics that deserve treatment.
Even Mathematica is not "full featured" by this view.
But I think we definitely have what can be considered a usable
product, meaning people can (and do) use SymPy to solve real problems,
which they might not be able to solve otherwise.
And just as importantly, when you use it, it just works. You don't
have to try to workaround some issue or limitation in what is
implemented. This is still not always true (I guess it's not really
true of any software product), but it's definitely way more true today
than it was when I started using SymPy back in 2009.
Honestly, in my view, the only reason that we should continue to keep
the 0 in the front of the version number is the assumptions. Once we
get that fixed, we should release SymPy 1.0. But what do I know. Maybe
SymPy 1.0 should be released now, and when the assumptions get fixed
it would be SymPy 2.0.
Aaron Meurer
> To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAH4pYpT2nMJDX%2BxG-BYu%2BfF6ZSa3oehgjX8B4SqWo-O0%2B5%2Bdeg%40mail.gmail.com.