Am 02.11.2014 um 23:28 schrieb Aaron Meurer:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Joachim Durchholz <
j...@durchholz.org> wrote:
>> Am 02.11.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Aaron Meurer:
>>>
>>> Your browser isn't rendering the MathJax. Which browser are you using?
>>> Can you try a different one? Also try clearing the cache. And if that
>>> doesn't work, open the web inspector and see if there are any console
>>> logs from the Javascript.
>>
>>
>> I have Javascript disabled, so I guess that's the reason.
>>
>> It would be nice if the site didn't fall back to that all-backslashes
>> representation for non-JS visitors.
>
> You can't really expect to browse the modern web without Javascript.
Sorry, you can. I do it every day.
> I
> think showing the raw latex is fine.
Is
\(a\)
raw latex?
> It's far more accessible than
> images, and it is readable.
Do you consider this:
\[\begin{split}\sum_{m \leq i < n} f(i)\end{split}\]
readable?
I can't make heads nor tails of it.
> I really don't know what you would expect
> to happen here.
It would be fine if we could simply have the HTML+CSS that MathJax
generates.
> Literally any kind of nice thing that could happen
> requires Javascript.
That's a gross exaggeration.
Nicely formatted math is possible, even in HTML+CSS - MathJax
demonstrates it, the final result after it did its work is indeed just HTML.
> Also note that we didn't write this code. We're
> just using MathJax, so if you have any suggestions on how they could
> improve their usability for your situation you should make a feature
> request to them.
I would be unable to even word such a requests, because my knowledge
about how these web pages are built is practically nonexistent.
AFAICT MathJax scans the page for <span class="math">, parses the Latex
it finds, and replaces the contents of the <span> with whatever output
format is desired.
That's essentially broken by design, since you can't have a better
format than Latex as a fallback display. Unless MathJax allows a better
input format by itself.