On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 at 22:00, Michael Keller <
mike...@042.ch> wrote:
>
> Do we need to know though - I think it would already be helpful to add
> info telling the user that their transmitter battery is possibly about
> to run out of power in cases where we detect that we get transmitter
> pressure data, but no transmitter battery status data for Suunto
> transmitters.
I think some warning when we do have pressure readings but no battery
reading might be reasonable.
So something like "you have a Suunto tank pod that doesn't generate
battery information - your battery may be weak" might be reasonable.
And I just refreshed my memory: apparently the Suunto tank pods (as
opposed to the older suunto wireless transmitters) actually use SAFT
batteries.
They are great batteries - and expensive - and not the usual Lithium
ones (still using it, but apparently LiSOCl2 chemistry).
Their voltage curve is actually very flat indeed, and then they
completely fall off a cliff when they are done. Even more so than
"regular" lithium batteries.
Going by the voltage curves I find with google that SAFT has in their
datasheets, the voltage curve is so flat that I would expect that
you'd have to do something else than track the voltage for remaining
battery life.
So I was probably wrong on the "use the voltage to estimate remaining
battery life". There might be something else going on. Maybe a lot of
guesstimating.
The end result is not that different, though: I suspect it's hard to
get reliable numbers, so at some random point the firmware in those
tank pods probably goes "I don't know, and I can't even guess" and
then the battery percentages stop being reported.
Linus