Who are Reginald and Clovis then, if they don't appear in the stories?
On 9/25/25 3:14 PM, Vince wrote:
> There’s a single website, the British Newspaper Archive. I’ll send you 
> the details offline.
> 
> So, yes, good question. I have not done so, and would prefer not to do 
> so, for these reasons.
> 
>  1. Only the pseudonymous story in /Reginald in Russia /actually
>     involves Reginald. The remaining thirteen stories do not.
>  2. Likewise, one of the stories in the Clovis book does not involve
>     Clovis at all, and others only mention him only in the periphery.
>     E.g., “Mrs. Packletides Tiger” has two mentions of him in two
>     consecutive sentences, but otherwise he is not present. Same for
>     “The Oversight,” “Wratislav” (only one reference), and others. IOW,
>     like /R in R/, a number of the “Clovis” stories aren’t about Clovis
>     at all.
>  3. If you look at the chronological order of the stories, i.e. the
>     order they’ll appear in the omnibus, he wrote other stories, in the
>     same paper, in the midst of both. IOW, an omnibus in chronological
>     would present the stories in the same order they appeared to the
>     public originally.
>  4. For a couple of reasons—his forays into novels, his “early” death in
>     WWI (he was in his early forties)—he did not have anywhere near the
>     volume of output that, e.g., O Henry, Maupassant, Chekhov, did (all
>     of whom are over 800K, while this will be around 220K), and his
>     shorts tend to be /short/. Splitting his work into three pieces will
>     make for some pretty short works.
>  5. We have omnibuses for the others in the triumvarate (O Henry and
>     Maupassant are the two he is most often mentioned with), and I would
>     hate to have not have all of Munro's in one place as well. This is
>     admittedly a bit of a sentimental reason, but I thought the above
>     was enough even without it.
> 
> 
> Thus, an omnibus is how I’ve proceeded—I am about to start proofreading. 
> I can change it if you prefer, but I’m hoping not. :)
> 
> Yes, I thought the name was made up until I saw it on Wikipedia. Just 
> from browsing while preparing everything for proofreading, Munro 
> frequently makes up outlandish names, so I assumed this was another one. 
> As the saying goes, truth is stranger than fiction.
> 
>> On Sep 25, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Alex Cabal <
al...@standardebooks.org> wrote:
>>
>> Great work Vince. I've added the spreadsheet to the website.
>>
>> Some notes:
>>
>> - SE can pay for access to scans if you need. Put together a list of 
>> websites that you would need a subscription for and I'll see what I 
>> can do.
>>
>> - There are two Reginald books. If those are all shorts featuring the 
>> same Reginald character, should we do a "Reginald Stories" omnibus 
>> separately?
>>
>> - Same question for Clovis
>>
>> - Chiozza Money - what a name! It's even funnier that he changed it 
>> *to* Money! 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBam72eYsAg
> 
> standardebooks/5CB7E0E6-9D63-4D9D-A6F3-258C163FF761%
40letterboxes.org 
> <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/standardebooks/5CB7E0E6-9D63-4D9D- 
> A6F3-258C163FF761%
40letterboxes.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.