Hello,
Let me tell you about me and my recent project with building a SETI-waveguide
I always meant to go down this path and learn a bit more about antennas and general RF as well as being able to scan the sky for myself but life didn’t let me, until now.
Then Atlas arrived and I thought to myself that this is a perfect excuse to finally learn the heavy stuff and so I started constructing a semi-printed version of a waveguide. As I had just started to use Chat-GPT for philosophical discussions I thought it would home me straight…
Chat is a really helpful tool and as dumb Rainman with confirmation bias as a standard… It also hallucinates and you really must have a strict BS-filter in order to use it successfully. After navigating around the BS I decided to build a “mix-feed” in order to be able to record
1420MHz as well as 1665MHz. This was to be a disaster as a can with 78mm in diameter was by Chat marked as “Sweet spot”... I lost two weeks here.
The first iteration with a printed can of 135mm in diameter and 300mm in height was bad and I got a S11 value of maybe -5db at best… I now decided to demote Chat, he was not to be trusted in decision making.
I then did what I should have done in the first place, I followed the design of Apostolos Spanakis-Misirlis and built a “standard” SETI-waveguide and lo and behold, this sucker worked!
I have chosen an approach with PetG plastic for both inside and outside, I know there must be some decibels lost on S11 with me having a plastic liner around the walls but this makes it really sturdy and keeps the shape neat.
And here is the result:


It seems to work but other than being really good at getting my test-signal I really haven’t seen or even processed anything for real.
If anyone is interested in this building technique and would like to know more, just send me a message or a reply here. That goes for telling me I am wrong too.
Kind regards // Jim
On Feb 11, 2026, at 10:23 AM, 'b alex pettit jr' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
If you widen the analysis band width, you can see more of the response curve. ?
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/1701424308.947440.1770827035509%40mail.yahoo.com.

Hello,
Let me tell you about me and my recent project with building a SETI-waveguide
I always meant to go down this path and learn a bit more about antennas and general RF as well as being able to scan the sky for myself but life didn’t let me, until now.
Then Atlas arrived and I thought to myself that this is a perfect excuse to finally learn the heavy stuff and so I started constructing a semi-printed version of a waveguide. As I had just started to use Chat-GPT for philosophical discussions I thought it would home me straight…
Chat is a really helpful tool and as dumb Rainman with confirmation bias as a standard… It also hallucinates and you really must have a strict BS-filter in order to use it successfully. After navigating around the BS I decided to build a “mix-feed” in order to be able to record
1420MHz as well as 1665MHz. This was to be a disaster as a can with 78mm in diameter was by Chat marked as “Sweet spot”... I lost two weeks here.
The first iteration with a printed can of 135mm in diameter and 300mm in height was bad and I got a S11 value of maybe -5db at best… I now decided to demote Chat, he was not to be trusted in decision making.
I then did what I should have done in the first place, I followed the design of Apostolos Spanakis-Misirlis and built a “standard” SETI-waveguide and lo and behold, this sucker worked!
I have chosen an approach with PetG plastic for both inside and outside, I know there must be some decibels lost on S11 with me having a plastic liner around the walls but this makes it really sturdy and keeps the shape neat.
And here is the result:
>linux-headers-6.12.69+deb13-amd64
It seems to work but other than being really good at getting my test-signal I really haven’t seen or even processed anything for real.
If anyone is interested in this building technique and would like to know more, just send me a message or a reply here. That goes for telling me I am wrong too.
Kind regards // Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/f2f50b45-b097-4a8a-a309-0b0a3965ac97n%40googlegroups.com.
The skin depth (δ) of RF in copper at 1420 MHz can be calculated using the formula:
δ = √(2/(ωμσ))
Where:
At f = 1420 MHz (the hydrogen line frequency):
δ = √(2/(2π × 1420 × 10⁶ × 4π × 10⁻⁷ × 5.96 × 10⁷))
δ ≈ 1.73 micrometers (μm) or about 0.0017 mm
This extremely shallow skin depth means that at 1420 MHz, the RF current flows in a very thin layer near the surface of the copper conductor. This has important practical implications.
And for aluminum:
δ ≈ 2.12 micrometers (μm) or about 0.0021 mm
So aluminum's skin depth at 1420 MHz is about 23% larger than copper's (2.12 μm vs 1.73 μm), which makes sense since aluminum has lower conductivity.
Practical implications:
From: fasleitung3 <sara...@googlegroups.com>
To: sara-list <sara...@googlegroups.com>
Date: Thursday, 12 February 2026 1:09 PM MST
Subject: Re: [SARA] My take on the SETI-Feed
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/da9de3c0b1a59cfe14273009562185049cfe8b01.camel%40googlemail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/1023141260.23210853.1770933712952.JavaMail.zimbra%40blackfoot.net.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/698E5F76.9010107%40typnet.net.

