--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/cd97217c-6d59-4f30-ae2e-ace681a46ed5n%40googlegroups.com.
I also put a copy of these beautiful notebooks here:
https://cocalc.com/wstein/support/IntroToManifolds
This has some pros and cons over nbviewer + mybinder (see
https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc/issues/6015).
Le vendredi 24 juin 2022 à 18:52:00 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit :
I also put a copy of these beautiful notebooks here:
https://cocalc.com/wstein/support/IntroToManifolds
Thanks!There is some issue in the latex display of manifold maps:ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \mbox at position 96: …thbb{E}^{2} \\ \̲m̲b̲o̲x̲{on}\ A : & \ph…This has some pros and cons over nbviewer + mybinder (see
https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc/issues/6015).
Indeed, mybinder + Sage is broken at the moment (*). It would be nice to have an alternative solution on CoCalc!
Eric.(*) mybinder + Sage used to work quite reasonably (by means of Sage's Docker images) some 2 years ago or so.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/968791fe-ddb2-4ae5-92e2-1c1b255e5211n%40googlegroups.com.
> There is some issue in the latex display of manifold maps:
> ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \mbox at position 96: …thbb{E}^{2} \\ \̲m̲b̲o̲x̲{on}\ A : & \ph…
Thanks -- I've created this issue in case you're curious about the situation:
https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc/issues/6019
In particular, I think it would be better if the latex representation
output by sage manifolds used "\text{on}" instead of "\mbox{on}";
however, I'll add a workaround in CoCalc so that isn't necessary.